Abdullah Bin Awaz v. This revision is filed challenging the order, dated
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. --------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED:09-03-2010 Hsd
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS.5750 OF 2009. ORDER: This revision is filed challenging the order, dated 28-08-2009, in I. A. No. 988 of 2009 in A.S.No.12 of 1994, on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, wherein the application filed under Order 41 Rule 27 r/w Section 151 CPC to receive the documents, was dismissed.
In view of the order passed by this Court in CRP 5749 of 2009, there are no grounds to allow this revision. However, it is made clear that the Court can compare the disputed signatures with that of the admitted signatures as required under Section 73 of the Evidence Act. But, the Court cannot take the role of an expert in comparing the signatures. It can only take assistance for comparison with reference to the expert’s opinion and other evidence available on record.
With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. --------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED:09-03-2010 Hsd
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — s. 73.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 09 Mar 2010. The bench was K C BHANU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.