The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be p{eased to STAY all further proceedings made in OP.No. 17212010 dated 03.05.20 13 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Vehicle Acctdents Claims Tribunal cum ll Addl District Judge, Karimnagar at Jagtial pending disposal of the appeal. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(M ACI14AMP. NO: 945 OF 2015) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in ther :ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High ccr rt may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the deposited amounr n pursuance of the orders in MACMAMP.no. 5680 of 20'13 in MACMA(SR).r r 40915 of 2013 dt. 11t11t2013 in accordance with the ratio counsel for the Appellant(s):sRt. CHANDRA SEKHAR N (rs ) FoR TsRTc zoNE 2) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI K.VENUMADH,a r' Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : - The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA M.A.C.M.A.No.906 of 20 15 JUDGMENT: This Appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 03.05.2O13 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum II Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, at Jagital in MVOP No.172 of 2OlO

2. The matter was referred to the Lok-Adalat, whereupon an Award dated O8.03.2025 was passed. A copy of the Award is placed on record.

3. In that view of the matter, this Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 08.O3.2O25 passed in the tok- Adalat. No costs Pending miscellaleous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- ,A .OSMAN ALI BAIG TANT REGISTRAR To, //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER

1. The Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal cum ll Addl. District Jduge, Karimnagar at Jagtial.

2. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Buildings at Hyderbad.

3. One CC to SRl. CHANDRA SEKHAR N (SC FOR TSRTC ZONE 2) Advocate loPUCl Gl!'- I 4 One CC to SRI.K VENUMADHAV Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies GE/PSL Enclosing along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award D HIGH COURT DATED:1 1.06.2025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.906 of 2015 i\ + 1:l D'.-t 2ffi DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD * i BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. IUnder Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1 9g7 (Central Act)j Date:08_03_2025 iVIC{9 q a_ic'I m + t"qliSxs' .E "r,. l,r,; S(.:c Present:1 . Hon'ble Sri Justice Anil Kumar Jukanti (Judge, Hon,hle High Court for the State ofTelangana) Chairman

2. Sri S. Arun Kumar, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M,A.N O.906 of 2015 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST Ori (On the fite of the Chairm Distri inal Pet ition.No.172 of 201O an, Motor Vehicte Accidents Ctaims Tribunat_ Cum-ll Addt. ct Judge, Karimnagar :: at :: Jagtial) Between: - 7 3 4 A.P.5.R.T.C. Rep. by The Vice Chairman And Managing Director, ApSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. AND Manlq Rama Devi, W/o. Late Mandam Janardhan, Aged 28 years, occ: Beedi Worker. Manlam Rohith Raj, S/o. Late Mandam Janardhan, Aged 10 years, occ: Student. A,landam Kaushik Raj, S/o. Late Mandam Janardhan, Aged 8 years, Occ:Student. ...Appettant/Respondent No.2 Mohammad Abdut Quatiq, S/o. Nazeerul Haq, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Driver of APSRTC Bus bearing No. AP-10-2-75,14, to Metpatty depot (Staff No.29277), R/o. H. No.4-5-8 1, Kazee Mahetta, Jagtiat, Karimnagar District. (Petitioners 2 & 3 are minors represented by their Next friend, guardian and natura[ mother M;ndam Rama Devi i.e., Respondent No.1 herein) Atl are residents of Korutla proper and Mandat, Karimnagar District. .Respondents/Claimants AWARD This is an appeal fi(ed by the Appettant(s) - Tetangana State Road Transport corporation, chattenging the order dated 03-05-2013 passed in MVop No.172 of 2010 by chairman, Motor vehicte Accidents Claims Tribunat- cum-ll Addt. District Judge, Karimnagar at Jagtiat. C;': 2-5riP.N.M.Chary,Lawofficer.TheAuthorizelrepresentatiVe Aopettan t(s)/ TGSRTC has appeared and represented hat the Corporation decided not to pursue the present appeat and thereforr: -hey are withdrawing / the appeat.

3. The said representation is recorded and the appeal is drs nissed as withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Court/l -ibunal betow. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) sha . be deposited by the Corporation/TGSRTC(s) within one month from the date of receipt of copy of the award, atong with interest. +. On such deposit, the Respondent/Ctaimant(s) is/are px rmitted to withdraw hisi her/the'ir respective amount/s as per the a'r rrd passed by the Tribunat/lvlACT.

5. ln case, the parties subsequentty come to know ;:out fiting of cross appeat/cross objection, they are given Iiberty to seek recat[ of this Order/Award.

5. Court fee paid on this appea[ shatl be refunded. 7. No costs. LAW OFRCER-II TGSRTC Bus Bhaven' HYd Appel Te lan ana 5 EENd} ral:i )n c IRMAN o -cERVc€6 9s' MEMBER COURT t5 o O H\GH LOK t ittee)