The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondents in not providing financial assistance of Rs-10,00,0001 as per G.O.Ms.No. 36 Revenue (FF) Department, Dt.27-1O-2O14, to the Petitioner No.1 and also not providing employment to the petrtioner No.2, as illegal, arbitrary, voilative of Article 14,16,21 of Constitution of lndia and also against the policy of the government as proclaimed in G.O.t\/s.No. 36 Revenue (FF) Department, Dt. 27-10-2014 and consequently direct the respondents to pay financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000lalong with interest of 8 percent from the date of issuing the said G.O, to the petitioner No. 1 and also to provide employment and to the petitioner No.2 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in support of the petition, the High Cc,urt may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to consider the representation dated 2g-04-2025, of the petitioner No.2 submrtted before Respondent No. 3 aird to pass appropriate order as per G.O.l\,4s.No. 36 Revenue (FF) Department, Dt 2Z-10-2014 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. H. R. CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2&3: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDy, GP FOR REVENUE/ GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI.IUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.20 146 0F 2025 ORDER: Heard Mr. B.H'R. Choudary, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Muralidhar Reddy, tearned Gort'Pleader for Revenue, appcaring for respondents

2. l " petitioner is u'if'e of Late Basheer Khan and 2nd petitioner is his son. According to the l't petitioner' her husband BasheerKhan,diedonl].05.20l0whileparticipatinginthe procession fbr the cause of Telangana Statehood due to heart attack. Therefbre, according to the petitioners' the deceased died lor the cause of 'l-elangana Statehood' Therefore' petitioners' being legal heirs of deceased, are entitled for compensation in terms of G.O. Ms. No. 3 6/Revenue(F F ) Deparlment, dated 27' l0'20 | 4' They have subrnitted a representation dated 28 '04 '2025 to 3'd respondent with a request to pay cotnpensation in terms of the said G'O' It is also the specific contention of the petitioners herein that earlier' they have submitted a reprcsentation to 3'd respondent and also to the Chief Minister. Ihe Revenue Divisional Ofhcer and Tahsildar concemed subrnitted their reporls to the 3'd respondent. They have enclosed copies of the said reports along with the aloresaid 2 representation s. Even the11, .rd -) respondent i; r-rot paying compensation to the petitioners herein. Aggrieved by the said inaction of 3'd respondent, the petitioner flled present writ petition

3. Leamed Govt. Pleader tbr Revenue, c,n instructions, would submit that the Covemnrcnt has issued tf .().Rt.No.399, dated 02.09.2016 with regard to administrative sanction lor an amount ol Rs.10,00,000r- AS monetary assistance to bereaved family members, who have sacrillced their lives lor achieving statehood of Telangana. Vide G.O.Rt.No.250, dated 19.06.2025, the Government has extended beneflt to Smt. Basht:tti Shobha w/o late Sri Bashetti Venkateshrvarlu. Thc petitioners names are not found in the said G.Os. Petitioners are claitning c{)mpensation as per G.O.Rt.No.36, dated 21 .10.2.0I4

4. As discussed supra, Revenue Divisional Officer (FAC), Tahsildar, Metpalli Mandal, have submitted reports dated

18.07.2019 and 06.08.20 19 to thc 3"r respondetrt lbr payment of compensation in terms o1' G.O.Ms.No.36, datt'd 27.10.2014. Therefore, 3'd respondent has to consider the satre and dispose of the representations subrnitted by the petitioners and copy of the report dated 18.07.20 l9 ol Tahsildar, Metpalli lVlandal. IIe has ./ \t is wif'e of deceased late petrtloner speciflcallY stated that I Basheer Khan, who has 04 daughters aud 05 sons' Having received respondent the aforesaid represenlation dated 28'04'2025' 3 should have considered the same and disposed it of in accordance with [aw, instead of keeping it pending

5. In the light ol the atbrcsaid discussion' this writ petition is disposed of directing 3'd respondent to consider the representation clated 28.04.2025, reports of the RDO and Tahsildar' dated 17.08.2019, 18.07.2019' l{e shall ailbrd an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners herein' It'3"r respondent is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioners' he shall pass an order assigning specific reasons and communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioners' t{e shalt complete the said exercise within two (2) months tiom the date of rcceipt of a copy of this order' As a sequel thereto, rnisccllaneous petitions' if any pending in the writ petition shall stand closed SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// secrroNrrcrn To,

1. The Principal Secretary' (Political)' General Administration Department' (ccLA)' For the state or , ff:.."8li:itc?#*ffi::: Land . |;5 x]:I1ts ::lly; :;! "lx::fl JIi?; J,!,**, co'ecto rate J astiar' J asti a I , B';X'3t" to SRI B H R cHowDARY' Advocate toPucl -AcQuisrtion

5. Two CCs to Gp FOR r ^ glr"FG;;r;i ;;],;6:)ERAL ADtvrNISrRArror/ o. two CCs to Gp FOR , Hyderabad [oUTJ ,. rwo (_CS to Gp FOR LAND ACQUIS|TION H " ]ulr1o3n^r, at Hyderabad [OUT; " ;ff cD copies ,Hish court for the state REVENUE, High Court for tl-e state of Telangana, at - --'-" '-'" ntg r Court for the State of \ GJP W HIGH COURT DATED:1510712025 ) /,,. tt.i] li a1 ir.) :r J, ,, () S r.., r --\. ( 9r\: .^'i\ 02 SEP 20[ 11r "..-. t ,"I-?, I I ORDER WP.No.20146 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1 q \