✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of MANDAIVUS decraring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the 3,d responclent in not renewing/re_issuing the petitioner's passport vide No. N 038103g issued on 25-06-2015 pursuant to rhe application vide fire No. 25-200263 3174 0n the ground of pendency of criminar case vide c c No 174 0t 2021 under sections 4g8-A, 506 0f rpc and sec. 3 and 4 0f D P Act on the fire of the court of the Speciar Judiciar Magistrate of First class (lt/obile) for triar of cases under pcR Acrcum-rV Additionar Junior civir Judge at Khammam as iregar, arbitrary, unconstitutionar, in vioration of principres of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the passports Act, .1967 consequently direct the 3'd respondent to renew/re_issue the petitioner,s N 0381039 through online VFS IVlode without reference to the passport vide No. said criminal case oF 2025 IA NO: 1 ' Petition under Sect ion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the High Court maY be Pleased to in the aff idavit f iled in support of the petitton direct the 3rd respondent to consider the p etitioner's application vide No 25- 200263317 4 through online VFS mode for re newal of PassPort bearing No' N 0381039 wlthout reference to criminal case vide C.C.No 174 of 2021 undet IPC and Sec. 3 and 4 of D.P.Act on the file of the court of sections 498-A. 506 of agistrate of First Class (tvlobile) for trial of cases under the SPecial J udicial M onal J unior Civil Judge at Khammam, Pending disPosal of PCR Act-cum-lV Additi in this Hon'ble Court the above writ Petition IA NO :2O F 2025 Between: Ab d u I B a r J a v v 1r L a t f i s'" Occ. Private EmPl Karimnagar' r"''no'l"Y' oti*t scjs6or Fi"tt;'trv'"t"iiding- "t' Street, Aldughe'tn"r. iilr3'g""Xxtt'isaot t Kinsdom of saudt Araota * f '",tRl' I Y-1[?9*'' il; Sni8"?8:il i :.JJ: 3 !i B45B' 20 ...PETITIONER AND 1 Unton of lndra Rep by rts Secretary' Yil.,ri:-ty 1lF*t"rnal i Vrr[:: ittr A.,g,tltsfii:rs[,-xuilx at :sn:ta'J: ]3**??t'"" - m:Ul*ru J )isr.'it ?'"ir::i?ft:fl0;"* Por ice com m ssione rate' Khammam Affairs' New Delhi District "'RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to4 5 Smt Mohammad Reshma W/o Abdul Bur,Javad Latifi Aqed about 30 ' Occ Housewife, nlo o ruli'olilioiToii rvrurn'tna Road Radhavaiah Nagar' rr,irhr* Khammam Dtstrict' O ih" fiigl"' Commission of lndia Saudi Arabta' ..RESPONDENTS/PROPOSED RESPONDENTS No' 5&6 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondents 5 and 6 as respondents No 5 and 6 in the main writ petition as well in interlocutor'y' applicatrcns in W P No ZilA9 ot 2A25 Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. M. A. SHAKEEL Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: SRI NARAPARAJU AVANEESH Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'B LE SRI JUSTI CENAG ESH B HEE MAPAKA WRIT P ETITI ONN o.20L 090F2 o25 ORDER: The Writ Petition is fi'led challenging the inaction of Respondent No 3 in not renewing/re-issuing the petitioner's passport vide No'N 0381039 issued on 25'06'2015 pursuant to the application vide file No 25-2002633174' on the ground of pending crrminal case vide C'C'No' 174 of 2O2l under sections 498 A' 506 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of D P Act on the file of the court of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for trial of cases under PCR Act-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge at Khammam' 2. Heard M/s M A'shakeel' learned counsel for petitioner' Sri N.Avaneesh, lea-r-neri counsel for respondent Nos' 1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Home for respondent No'4' Perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mere 3. arraignment of the petitioner in a criminal case cannot be a ground for denial of passport' He relies on the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.2422 of 2024, dated 26'O2'2O24' I I I I I I i I t I : i I i a :' ::t. ' 2 N wP_20t09 202-i 4' Learned counsel for the respondents submits that a criminal case uide C.C.No. IZ4 of 2O2I under sections 498_4, 506 of IpC and Section 3 and 4 of D.p.Act on the file of the court of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First class (Mob,e) for trial of cases under PCR Act-cum_IV Additional Junior Civil Judge at Khammam, is pending against the petitioner. It is submitted that the respondent authorities wouid consider the petitioner,s applicatio. for a period of one year only, if he obtains permission to travel abroad from the court r.l,here the criminal cases are pending against him. 5' Be that as it may, considering the judgment of the coordinate Bench of this Court in W.p.No.35056 of 2023, dated O2.O1.2O24, and the purpose for which the passport is being requested by the petitioner, this Court directs the respondent No.3 to renew the passport to the'petitioner on the following conditions: i) The petitioner herein shall submit ar with an arnaavit i" t_c.rvo.rz+ f;;il;H;lJ:1".T:TLr#:l: Special Judicial Magistrate of First Cf""=-1ii"fif"1 for trial of cases under pcR Act_cum_rV. Add;ii;"J:fiil; civir Judge at Khammam., statinc rhat he "h;u;;;i;;,i.,iJi. a,rirrg pendencv ill' .-o,.. .,, i tr,.t i I :i# :."#:";t ." *.N'i 1" yt-'"'L-i""j"" trial court in concluding tr." p"""L.affi ii "i=. the said c.cs.; ::llleeillil#H"=J:.:L#:iHy:?ff "*":x:";ltf H"lx; -herein shall submit an application afresh along wit-h certified ". weu as the aforesaid undertaking before fh"e p."=;;rt ;fltcer / Authority lconcerned for renewing the passporq i[.n".,11"T,,n':::"i#,n.il1iri:*:,,:lJ".i::i"""i,"#,"if iii) The petitioner ""pt;-Ai=-;;; weeks therefroml ".Tl : I l I I ./' 7 NBK.I \\ P,20109-2015 v) ResPondent N observations made by this Court herein as well as the contents of the undertaking given ;,""ti; fliitio""t .r"' renewing of the '*'Xttn 'itJ'- *"hin three (o3) weeks from DassDort, in accordance irtt itt" of said applicatt""ll rnt' consider the Passport Rules' 1967 while co,,sid"ri"g t-t'J'Jppri""ii"" for renewing of the Passport .to-th" P::1t^"1".1 authority shall specify the permission pissport for ,.,,"u ;i) ;1" ;'#i::"1;"' ;;i,i;;.;; relain iravelling abroad for buiinets purpose' 3nd also obtain itnnt*':l* .'* kxtm ; :ii:r #' "il; lTl,'.H'::' ti.'ft="pott upon return to rndia' fi;;;; vii) Arv ott'"t "Iiiiii"i- "" a""ttt"a aPProPriate by the -the " trial Court. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of There shall be 6 no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any' pending in this Writ Petition' sha,ll stand closed 'Rtt,3#[!'A:E'EFRRI 0- //TRUE COPY/I SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Secretary' Unron ot lndia' f\/inistry of ExternalAffairs New Delhi' ? +ffi R::1:ir,:sl?H iftf:l; Y,?:: ; +ffi tltJ x,iJ J ),ft".,:i BBt I! g i:H,ti f,lt J-:s "# heo c'o " R'nlof *,. p o r i ce c o m m i s s i o n e ra te, K h a m m a m o E 6 7 o plH:::qst;ffi i5ffituh+tFij*ff:'s?3*i?ft r,cls,n,'' Hvderabad [OUTI Two CD CoPies BM BSw CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:241A912025 I u- gF TEi '4 .-$ -Q\ + , + ):. 'r'l ORDER WP.No.20109 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS dra)'> \\ Fq\' i I I I i I : I j I I I I I I l

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments