The High Court · 2025

Smt. Dilnaaz Farooqui,, Wo. Mohammed Riyazuddin D/o. Mohammed Hameeduddin Farooqui. Aged about 41 years, Obc. Doctor, R/o. H. No 8-2- 293_11741115. Road No.'14, BN Reddy Colony, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034 AND Mr. Mohammed Riyazuddin,, S/o. years, Occ. Doctor, R/o. 1-8-1811, Habsiguda, Hyderabad 500007, P Complex, 6HBC+ JVW, Road, No. Mohammed Rasheeduddin, Aged about 45 Street No.8, Ravindra Nagar Colony, resently residing at R/o. Salmaniya Medrcal 2904, Manama Kingdom of Bahrain ...Petitioner ...Respondent lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section '151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Family Court to expedite the proceedings in G.W.O.P.No.163012023 on the file of the Hon'ble Family Judge, at Hyderabad pending disposal of main revision. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2607 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the Revision Petition by directing the learned trial Court to expedite and dispose of the FCOP No. 1905 ol 2023 on the file of the ll Additional Family Court Judge at Hyderabad. Between: 9mt. Dilnaaz Farooqui, Wo. Mohammed Riyazuddih D/o. Hameeduddin Farooqui, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Lroctor, Rio 29311741115, Road No.14, BN Reddy Colony, Banjara Hitls, 500034 Mohammed . H. No. 8-2- Hyderabad - AND Mr. Mohammed Riyqzuddin, S/o. Mohammed Rasheeduddin, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Doctor, R/o. 1-8-1811, Street No.8, Ravindra Nagar eolony, f ab.gigud-a, Hyderatad - 500007, Presently Residing at R/o.-Salmaniya Medical Complex, 6H8C- J\ /V, Road, No. 2904, Maharna Kingdom oi Bahrain ...Petitioner ...Respondent lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Family Court to expedite the proceedings in FC(f P No. 1905/2023 on the file of the Hon'ble ll Additional Family Judge, at Hyderabad pending disposal of main revision. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B KEERTHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: _ _ _ _ The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABI,E SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CIVI REVISION PETITION Nos.2595 a nd2607 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER Heard Sri B.Keerthi Reddy, learned counsel for the petrtloner.

2. These are Civit Revision Petitions which have been filed by the petitioner respectively with a limited prayer for an appropriate direction to the learned Il Additional Family Court, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, seized of F.C.O.P No.l905 of 2023 seeking dissolution of marriage under Section 2 (viii) (a) of the Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 and G.W.O.P.No. 1630 of 2023 under the provisions of the Guardianship and Wards Act for grant ol permanent custody of the minor chitdren. The request made by the petitioner through the present revision petitions is for expeditious conclusion of two O.Ps. The reason for seeking for such a request is that the petitioner, mother of two minor children, has recently got fellowship fron.r the United Kingdom and she intends to leave to United Kingdom to pursue her profession, as she is a qualified Doctor in Pediatrics. It was also contended that in order to move to United Kingdom along with the children, the petitioner was z required to obtain the decree of guardianship r1- the minor children from the competent Court

3. Ile further states that in the event ilthe procc;dings are not concluded at the earliest, the petitioner may lose the chancc to pursue her dream of practicing in the United Kingdo'n

4. The counsel for the petitioner further subrrits that the respondent-hu sband has already cntcred appearan,tc bclbre the family court in both these proceedings. Hower r,r, since the proceedings arc only at the conciliation stage ancl in the usual course the proceedings may take considerably long period of'time, which could be detrimental to the petitioner, so f-ar as leaving to United Kingdom is concemed, the present revision pctitions have been filed.

5. Having considered the entire facts and circunr;tances of the case and also corrscious ol the f'act that thcre is largt' ltendency of cases at the Family Court concemed, it may not br'possible lor the Family Court to conclude thc proceedings in :;hor1 span of time, as the substantive hearing in the afbresaid nutters itself is not commenced. Nonetheless, considering precarit,us condition and the requireurent o1- the petitioner errabling hcr to lnove to 3 tlnitcd Kingdom, this courl is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met, if the leamed II Family Court is directed to make all endeavors in concluding the procccdings in both the matters i.e. FCOP No. 1905 ol 2023 and GWOP No. I 630 of 2023 within an outer limit of one year fiom the next date of hearing.

6. Meanwhile, the petitioner may make an appropriate request to the concerned authority in the United Kingdorn lor an appropriate extension of time so far as granting ol f'cllowship to the petitioner is concemed.

7. Accordingly, these Civil Revision Petitions are allowed directing the learned II Additionat Family Court, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, to concludc the proceedings in both the matters i'e' F.C.O.P No. 1905 ol 2023 and G.W.OP No. 1630 of 2023 within an outer limit of one year fiom the next date of hearing. No costs' Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- B REKHA RANI ISTANT REGISTRAR A //TRUE COPY'/ ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Family Court Judge at Hyderabad z. fn. f r AOaltional Family Court Judge at Hyd-erabad 5 O"L CC to Sri B Keerthi Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies ABK :>\ .-..---\ .:\ 'i: :. !. Li HIGH COURT DATED: 1410812025 -.4 /- COMMON OROER CRP Nos: 2595 and 2607 OF 2025 i i rtT il[l \. ",_\, ALLOWING BOTH THE CRPs 3o tp 8r( I