SRI S. A v. RATNAM

9. Katta Srinivas, S/o. Saraiah, ASed 30 years, Rl/o. H.No. 3-599/3 Parkal town and fVlandal, Warangal District.

10. Chenna Sambaiah, S/o. Raghavulu, Aged 39 years, Rl/o. Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

11.Md. Osman Ali, S/o. Shaik Madar, Aged 45 years, F|/o. Near Masjid, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District l2.Vangapalli Ramesh, S/o. Rajaiah, Aged 41 years, Fyo. H.No.3-867, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

13.Merugu Ramesh, S/o. Gopal, Aged 45 years, R:/o. H.No. 3-793, Parkal town and Mandai, Warangal District l4.Chidurala Swarajyam, Wio. Srihari, Aged 50 years, Rl/o. H.No. 3-507, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

15.Bojjam Ravindar, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged 40 years, R/o. H.No.3-932 Parkal town and [\/andal. Warangal District

16.Bochu Mallaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged 48 years, Rl/o. NearCSl Church, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

17.Bochu Madan, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged 21 years, Rl/o. Near CSI Church, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District lS.Mulkanuri Ravi, S/o. Ra.jaiah, Aged 36 years, Rl/o: H.No.8-169, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

19. Chenna Janardhan, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged 48 years, Fl/o. Parka town and Mandal, Warangal District

20.Boini llaiah, S/o. Komuraiah, Aged 48 years, Rl/o. H.No.3-9,14, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

21.Poloju Satyam, S/o. Rathaiah, Aged 38 years, Rlio. Near Vegetable Market, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

22.Deva Ramalingam, S/o. Rajaram, Aged 64 years, Rl/o. H.No. 6-314, Parkal town and Mandal. Warangal District

23.Sadu Satyam, S/o. Saraiah, Aged 40 years, Rl/o. NearChaitanya Model High school, Parkal town and lVlandal, Warangal District

24.Kadari Amaiavathl Wo. Nandam, Aged 48 years, Fi./o. H.No. 3-832, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District

25. Cheripally Tharasu Chandra, S/o. Rajam, Aged 38 years, Rl/o. near Liftle Flower School, Parkal town and Mandal, Warangal District ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Telangana, Represented by its, Principal secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 a Parakal Nagarlapanchayath, Represented by its commissioner, Parka, Warangal District. Roads and Buildings Department, Represented by its chief Engineer, Parkal, Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a suitable wril, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the high handed action of the Respondents in trying to evict the Petitioners from their respective bunks without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and direct the Respondents not to evict the Petitioner from their respective business bunks adjacent to APSRTC Bus stand in Prakal village, Warangal District. l.A. NO: 1 OF 20i,4{WPM P. NO: 435'14 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents not to evict the Petitioners from their restive.bunks adjacent to the APSRTC Bus Stand, Parkal, Warangal District pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. A. V. RATNAM(NONE APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Couil made the following: ORDER I I HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALTSHETTY WRIT PETITION No.34788 of 2014 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking following relief: 'To declare the high handed action of the respondents in trying to euict the petitioners from tleir respectiue bunks utithout following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary.'

2. No representation on behalf of petitioners

3. Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.2, on written instructions would submit that respondent No.2 has takcn up thc drive for removal of road encroachments at the site from TSRTC Bus Stand to Vellampally Road in ttrc -r'cirr 2O I 4. Petitioners have been carrying on thcir business by encroaching the public road since several years and thcreforc, notices have been issued to the petitioners and petitioners have been evicted from the encroached place by follorving due process of law, without violating the principles of natural justice. Therefore, cause in the writ petition does not survive.

4. Recording the aforesaid submission of learned Standing counsel for respondent No.2, thc Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Thcre shall be no order as to costs. \ 2 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANTREGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII

1. One CC to Sri S A V Ratnam, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CC to The GP for Road and Buildings, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT]

3. One CC to Sri Putta Krishna Reddy,(SC for MC,TELANGANA) [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies d \ To, TJ PVL HIGH COURT DATED:2 410912025 ORDER WP.No.34788 of 2014 \ * f riE STa 2 I JAt{ 2026 n// ,, :=:-:"' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 1 I ,+,{ V,b