The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.S.SUMITH RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondbht No.c: SRI R.POOLSINGH NAtH., AGP FOR ROADS & BI.,,ILDINGS ,! The Court made the following: ORDER *ffi.:+r5p, -.E-. ./ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL \IIRIT PETITION No.20067 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petit;.n is fiied praying this Court to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 a, d 3 in deleting/ removing the name of the petitioner's father late Kapa Ma11a Reddy in Bhu Bharati portal 1n respect of the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1.i5 guntas 1n Sy.No.908/A situated at Arza Vi1lage, Ieeja Mardal, Jogulamba Gadr,r'al District and including the said extent the notional khata of respondent No.4 in Sy.No.9O8/Al / I / l, without issuing any notice and providing an opportunity of hearing, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 and there under apart from violative of Articles 14, 2l and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to restore the name of the petitioner's father in respect of the aforesaid lald and for other consequential reliefs 2 i:\/\r..1 V,rp 20067 2015

2. Hearci Sri R.S.Sumith Raj. lean:"rl {rc,unsel for the petitioner; Sri L.Ravincler, leat-necl Assistrrrt (ic,vernment : leader: for Revenue, <-lDpearing for respor-rc r:nl l.Jr_;s. I . . ? and Sri R. Poolsingh Naik, Learned Assista -r_ Gover-nment Pleader lor Roads emd Buildings, appearing itr responclcnt No.4 and \,.'ith their consent, this ri,rit pctrtion is being taken up lor disposal at the admission sr:rge

3. i.czrrned courrsel tbr the petitiot-ler \\,oLrl(i srjltmit thal l-l-re pi:titir;ner is the absolute ow,nr:r a_nci pc,ssessor of ihe agrrcuLtural land admeasuring Ac. i . l5 guntas in :-11,. i\1o.rntrO. sitr-rated at Aiza Viilage, ceja Marrriirl- I o9r-11261[;1 (iadi.r,a_l District, traviirg acquirecl the s:une i:_,rn 'ris father b1. r,r,a,y ol succession. Learned ccunsei ior lhe petitioner v,,ould Iurther. subnlit that originali.,T the petrticner's grandrather l:y nan)e Kapa .)ar:l,1ii;uratn Bheemarna 'lrl Bheem R.edd-v, rvars the absoltLte or,r,ner. a:rt1 possessor oI Lhe agricultura-l la_nrl adrrreasurirLg A,:s.13.12 guntas in S-v,No.908 situated at Aiza Village zurd out of the same,'the lar-rd admeasuring Acs.6.26 gu[tas \r.a.s alienated J I]VV, J Wp 20067 2025 by his grandfather in favour of Bheechanna (i Bheshanna ared the remaining extent of Acs.6.26 guntas r.vas retained l-ry his graldfather and the sarnc \...3s assigned sub-clivision number as Sy.No.90B/A. Learned counsel for the petitioner u,ould further submit that after the death of petitioner's grandfather, his father by name Kapa Ma-lla Redd,y had inherited the .same ald his father,s narne was mutated in a_11 the revenue records including the khasra pahani for the year 1954 55 and during his lifetime, the father of the petitioner has alienated the land to arr extent of Acs.3.39 guntas in favour of third parties ard converted the land to an extent of Ac.0.3B guntas into house plots and sold away the same to the third parties. Further, the lard to an extent of Ac.O.14 guntas was acquired for the purpose of laying the R & B Road. After the alienations, the father of the petitioner had retained the land to an extent of Ac.1.l5 guntas in Sy.No.9O8/A and after his father's death, he had inherited the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that recently the narne of the petitioner's father r.r,as removed from Bhu 4 L\i\'. J \\ r )lr0,r- i0)i Bharati portal and the same was illegaljy ir clude,ci in the notional khata ol respondent No.4. 'iheretrtre, the p'!itioner made a iepresentation, dateci 02 .)6.:o :- seeking to restore his father's name in the rer.:nue records ior the said cxtent of la.nd. Learned co rnsel for the petitioner rl.ould further submit that the gr;evalce of the iletitioner is that even afier receipt of the r:ltrescntatron, dated 02.05.2025 the respondent authorities did not consider the sarrre

1. Sri I-. Ravinder, learned Assistant Covernrnent Picader fcr Revenue appearing Ibr i'r:spondent Nos.2 ;tnd lJ has llot lisputed thr: subntission JI the representatior, da,.:d i2.06.202i :ind it is stated :hat the applicat on sr,rbmitcad b_"- the oet.itioner fuliilr; a1l the requilentents, tfre respondent authorities tvill consicier the sane

5. in view of Lhe zrbove submissions, this (tcurt, without going into merits of rhe case, deems it appropriate to dispose of rhe ri rit petition directing thr: respondenl authorities to conciuct enquiry on the represeltl.ation, dated 5 tVV, J \Yp _20067 2025

02.06.2025 submitted by the petitioner after issuing notice to a,il the stakeholders ar-rd after affording an opportunity of hearing to them and if tre p:tirirner satisltes a1l the requirements for restoring the name o1 the petitioner's lather in respect of the subject land in Bhu Bharati portal, consider the same ald pass a reasoned order strictly in accorclalce \\,ith law and communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs 7 . Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petitior-r, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/.C.DEEPIKA SISTANT REGIS i SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Depart Hyderabad, State of Telangana. i4e t, Secretariat Buildings,

2. The District Collector, Jogulamba Gadwal District. 3. The Tahsildar, leeja Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal Diskict. 4. The Execute Engineer, Roads and Buildings Crrcle, Gadwal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

5. One CC to SRI R.S.SUMITH RAJ, Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUIl..

7. Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 8- Two CD Copies BSR PMK W .- '.--:, I I I I I I t t i i l i l i i HIGH COURT DATED:1 1t1'112025 ORDER WP.No.20067 of 2025 o I ( t i-{ S 7;l 16: )(+( 21ll0uM Pe a) it,Eo cTA 9O -a * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ ?\ 1ts