✦ High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
27 Oct 2025
Length
1,179 words

1. G. Sridhar, S/o. G. Veeranna Aqed. Major, Occ. Business, R/o.'H'No'1-9-108' " Viovutn Nig;i coi;r _o-ieUf[i?g.t, Hyderabad - 500 060, (Owner of the Gai bearing tlo. AP-298U-0999)

2. The Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance copRany Limited,.-Fqpto. !v its Divisional frlanJger, North East Plaza, 4th flobr,.Beside BMW Show Room' odp. nfA ofricel Eiramanzil X Roads, Hyderabad - 500 082 n

3. G. Rajender Goud, S/o. G-..Sridhar, Aged.' 24 Years, Oqc-' Q1yel,-Yo' H'No'1- g-r08, Vidhilth NirgJr, bifiurfrni'gai Hyderabad - 5O0 06O (Driver of the - CriOL"rindN;.AF:igeU-0999) ...Respondents/Respondents - counselfor the Appellants : sri. P Ramakrishna Reddy Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 3 : None appeared Counset for the Respondent No. 2: Sri Hari Sridhar The Court made the following: IIEE HON'BLE SRr JUSTTCE C.V.BHASKAR REpDy MACMA No.32Z9 of 2Ot9 JUDGMENT: Pursuant lo the request made by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. On 13.09. 2o2l,the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat and an award was passed by the Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the MACMA is disposed of in terms of the award dated 13.09.2025 passed by rhe Lok Adalar. Pending rrLiscellaneous applications, if any, shall stancl closed. There shall be no order as to costs. sd/- M. JAVI/AHAR REDDY AtlT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To, Civil Ccurt, Hyderabad' (With records) l.TheMr>torAccidentsclaimsTribunal-cum-xlAdditionalchiefJudge'city 2. one c,l toSii Fnamar<iishna Reddv, A!v9-*te [oPUC] t. One C: to Sri Hari Sridhar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies w KH/DL i / 4 n , . :. !e "r -s{- { rqa!. i II . '!EyqEn! . -r- .- ?1;' ,f l. a r{ # a '"' 'r,. ( 'rg; HIGH COURT DATED:271'1012025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.3279 of 2019 IHE S 2 1 rIB 2fl2f; * t DISPOSINGi OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF AWARD OF LOK ADALAT a**^ Xs r;, BEFORE _THE LOK ADALA HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMTTTEE FOR THE STATE.OF TELANGANA, HYDE RABAD [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act). I Present:1 Sri"Justice G.V. Seethapathy, (Former Judge of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Chairman High Court)

2.Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate Member lvlAClvtA No.3279 of 2019 (Beforefiling of Appeat)- - AGAINST (On the fite of the Xl Additionat Chief Judge, City Civit Court, Hyderabad) Appe I lahts/Petitioners .ffi.. * t Respondents 1 7

4. 1 2 3 9 , Occ: Student o.[.ate Narayana, D Surekha, wlo. Aged: 36 years, Occ: Household , D/o.Late Surender, D.Jaya Aged: 1 D.Sai Charqn, 5/o.Late Surender, Aged: 16 years, Occ: Student D. Aged: 60 years, Occ: Househotd. (Petitioner No.3 is minor represented by his mother and guardi4n the petitioner No.1 herein) ALI are R/o. H.No.3-14-36t18/14, Vivek Nagar, Ramanthapur, Rahga Reddy District, Presentty R/o. H. No. 3-5-1 / 4tE, Vittatwadi, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. G. Aged: Major, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No. 1-9-108, Vidyuth Nagar Co[6ny, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad - 500'060. , Slo. G. Veeranna, The Bajaj Atlianz General lnsurance Company Limited, Reptd. by its Divisional Manager, North East P[aza, 4th 1[oor, Beside BMW Show Room, Opp: RTA Office, Erramanzil "X' Roads, Hyderabad - 500 082. a Aged: 24 years, Occ: Driver, R/o.H.No. 1 -9-1 08, Vidhyuth Nagar, Ditsukhnagar, Hyderabad- 500 060.. (Driver of the Car beraring No.AP-29 BU-0999) Counse[ for Appetlants/Petitioners Counsel for Respondent No.2/lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company Sri P.Rama Krishna Reddy, Sri Hari Sreedhar, Advocate. Ms.Mithravinda Devarasetty, LegaL Executive. This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok.Adal.at. and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award ispassed: I 'f,,- 2 AWAilD a l.line twenty six SEVER and ,fifty onty; to the'petitioners together with proportionate costs and interesi' @ 9% per annum from the date of petition i.e., 06-9:2016 to titt the date of actual deposit. rs an mants aggrieved by .. : . order paised by the xt Additionat chief Judge, cid civit court, Hyder.abad in [tVOP"No.2390 af 2016. Ms.lt'rithravinda Devarasetty. Legat Executive for ttre l{esponcient No.2 -tnsurance Company and the Appettant/petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.1 to 4 aLong with their: counsel have appeared and icientified before the Lok Adatat. During the pendency of this Appeal, the Appettant!/ ctaimants and Respondent No.2-tnsurance company have entered into a settlement. ln pursuance of the said settlement, .the Appettants/ctaimants have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.7,50,000/-(Rupees seven lakhs fifty thousand only) towards futl and finat setttement on their ctaim in a.ddition to the amount atready depcrsited and the lnsurance conrpany-Respontlent t{o.2 has agreed to pay :the same towards futt and final. setti.ement cf the cl.aim. A.ccordingty, cornpromise is recorded and the case is settted before the Lok.Adatat. , ln view of the above said settr,ement, the lnsurance cornpany shatt pay the above said amount vrithin a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of copy of this Award. ln the event of defautt or detay in making such deposit, the Appettants/clainrants are entitted to ctaim interest @ 9% per annum as awarded by the Tribunal from the date of defautt. The apportionment among to r'l shatt be made as per the apportionment determined in M.V.O.P;No.2390 af ?.016 by ttre Tribunat. Nos.1 Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Adatat. * i Apportionment Compensation, if any 1- The Appe[tants are entitled to the refu.nd of court Fee paid in this,appeai. . 2' The amount atreadl'deposited by the tnsurance company if any, shatt be given credit to. 3' Soon after deposit by the lnsurance.cornpany, the Appettant/petitioner/tlaimant Ncs. 1,2 & 4 are permitterl to withcravr their" share of minor "nfire Appetlant/Petitioner/claimant No.3 shal.t be kept in fixed deposit in unvlutionalized Bank titl' he attain majority as per the orders made by the Tribunat/Lower court. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel -u*ounti- il-il srraii .. ln tqrms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case disposed of. -{a------ 3\ rto . reu{.o. P- D-B1O/ 9ot6^ fnAer4,-$o, 7ry7,1-ryn l. D. Suu"rht . z, $- sryt eui fl-&yaSri

2. D €"l,e,l^r"*l,i)sr,)r,rqn l. C.' 3 b$r,l * Z, B{{ 4eoexl ansq6ro{@ ". +, D s\"r"d+L&. p, X*r,i W For Bajaj Co. Ltd. f\. r Counsel for: Appgllant (s) Counsel fo r Res pondent (s) Chairman ) t State

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments