1. Gali Rajender v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondent No.4 in not considering the petitioners representation dt.26l91202}, not to register agricultural land pertaining to Sy.No.9B/N1t19 an extent of Ac.20-009ts., situated at Nallabelly Village, ! t, Sangem Man6al, Warangal District Rural during the pendency of the civil suit in O.S.No.88Ot2O1g on the file of I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Warangal as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to dispossess thr: petitioner from the agricultural land in Sy.No.98lAl1l19 an extent of Ac.20-00gts., situated at Nallabelly Village, Sangem Mandal, Warangal District Rural without rbllowing due process of law' lA NO: 1 OF 2021 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responderrt No.4 not to dispossess the petitioner from the agricultural land in Sy.No.98/At1t19 an extent of Ac.20-00gts., situated at Nallabelly Village, Sangem lMandal, Warangal District Rural without following due process of law by considering tl're petitioners representation dt. 261912020, pending disposal of the above writ petition. GOUNSEI fOr tIrC PEtitiONErS: SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA Counset for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: MS. D. HARITHA KIRAN' AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for tlre Respondent No.S: SRI G. SANJEEV REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER i ! I I I I I .t .l THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR WI(AI{TI WRIT PETITTON No.58 of 2O2L ORDER: This writ Petition is filed seeking the following prayer: o...to issue a Wit Order or Direction more partianlarlg one in the nafite of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declare the action of the Respondent No.4 in not consideing th.e petitioners representation dt.26.9.2o20, not to register agrianltural land. pertaining to Sy.,lVo'98/A/1/19 an' extent of Ac.20-0O gts., situated at Nallabelly Village, Sangem Mand.al, Waro.ngal Distict Rural duing the pend.ency of the ciuil suit in O.S..lVo.B80/2019 on the file of I Ad"dl. Seniot' Ciuit .Judge, Warangal as illegal, arbitrary and" unconstitutional and consequentlg direct the respondent lto.4 not to dispossess tLrc petitioner fro* the agiatltural tand irt Sg.No.98/A/1/19 an extent of Ac.20-0O gts., situated at Nallabellg Village, Sangem Mand.al, Warangal District Rural without follou.ting due process o/ law andpass... "

2. Hear.d Mr. Praveen Kumar Veerjala, learned counsel for petitioners, Ms. D.Har-itha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos' I to 4, and Mr. G.Sanjeev Recldy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.S. It is brought to the notice of this court by learned 3. Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue that earlier 2 JAK, W.P.No.S8 of 2O21 i W.P.No.18870 of 20 19 was filed by respondent No.5 herein and th:.s Court by order dated 24.09.2019 disposed of the said w:rit petition directing the respondent authorities to take action on the application of the petitioner (respondent No.5 h,:rein) and issue pattadar passbook and title deeds and also mutate her name (Kothwala Aruna) in the revenue records. It is also brought to the notice that a Contempt Case irL C.C.No.1597 of 2019 was filed for disobeying the orders passed in !V.P.No.1BB70 oi 2019 and pursuant to the dire:ctions in W.P.No.18870 of 20 19, the then Tahsildar mutaterl the name of respondent No.5 herein in respect of land admeasuring Acs.20.O0 guntas in Survey No.98/A/1 situatecl at Nallabelly Village, Sangem Mandal uide proceedings dated 16. 1 l.2O19.

4. Orr a perusal of the prayer in the present writ petition i.e., V/.1).No.58 of 2021, it is observed that representation dated 26.09 .2020 rvas made by petitioners not to register land to an extent of Acs.2O.00 guntas pertaining to Survey No.98/lrlL / 19 situateci at Nallabelly Village, Sangem I I : Is I I I --o 3 JAK, J W.P.No.S8 of 2021 I Mandal, warangal District. on instructions, it is submitted across the Bar that Tahsildar has already mutated the name of unofficial respondent in the revenue records pursuant to directions issued in w.P.No.18870 of 20L9 vide proceeding NO.B/ 188 L /20 19, dated 16, Tl.2O 19 and issued pattadar passbook to her vide Khata No.215.

5. The cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication in view of the subm.issions made. Counsel for petitioners requested that it may be left open for the petitioners to pursue remedies avaiiable as per law. Needless to state that it is always open for the petitioners to pursue the remedies available under law.

6. For reasons aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed SD'. P.G: SULEKHA DEVI RE I I I ! I i I i i I I t i I i I I/TRUE COPY/' ECTION OFFICER The State of Telangana' Revenue Department' Telangana To, 1 The PrinciPal Secretary' iJir"iiii"t, HYderabad'

2. The District Collector' Warang al District, Warangal

3. The Re'renue Divisional Officer, Warangal Rural, Warangal District. 4. The Talrsildar, Sangem Mandal, Warangal District 5. One CC: to Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CC;s to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUTI I

7. One CC: to Sri A. Sanjeev Reddy, Advocate[OPUC] B. Two CD Copies TJ TJI/r* * I HIGH COURT DATED i1410812025 t t ORDER WP.No.Stl ot 2021 F DISPOSITIIG OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUI'COSTS \ ."e K-"*