✦ High Court of India · 11 Jul 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 11 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
11 Jul 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,225 words

Both Rl/o. Plot No.B33, Survey Nos.11l14 to 11118, Sri Swamy4yyapp-a Co- Op. Housing Society Ltd., Khbnamet (V), Serilingampally (M)' Ranga Reddy District' T's' ...PETraoNERs , AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Power and Energy Deoartment Secretariat. Hvderabad-500022.

2. Telangana State Southern'Power Distribution Company Limiled., Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Compahy Limited, Vidyuth Soud ha, Somajig uda,_Hy_derabad. +. The biviSional Engine6r, Operation Kondapur, TGSPDC L, Ranga Reddy Diskict. Reddy District.

5. The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, T G S P D C L, Ranga

6. The AssistantEngineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur, T G S P D C L, 7. Greater Hyd6rabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Ranga Reddy District. Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy Diskict. ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.833, in Survey Nos.11114 to 11l18, admeasuring 540 Sq. yards, situated at Sri Swamy Ayyappa Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd., Khanamet 7 (v), serilingamparry (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.s., bounde,J by North. prot No.B32, South. 30 ft Wide Road, East. Guftala Begumpet Village Boundary, West. Plot No.834., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequenfly direct the respondents to receive apprication and to rerease the individuar s<:rvice connection without being influenced by the instructions of the 7th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circum:;tances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be oreased to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to receive the apprication and rerease the individual service connection to the petitioner, the prot No.g33, in surv.y Nos.11114 to 11118, ad measuring 540 Sq. yards, situated at Sri Swamy a,yyappa Co_Op. Housing Society Ltd., Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. plot No.B62; South. 30 ft. Wide Roarl; East. Guttata Begumpet Village Boundary; West. plot No.B34. Counsel for the petitioners: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Coungel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGY counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 To 6: sRr N.SREEDHAR REDDy, sc FoR 9g.yl:"r for the Respondent No.7: sRt c.MADHUr,]3;ii?t rDy, sc FoR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.19996 OF 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed, under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "..,1o rbsue an appropiate Wit, order or dtrection more pdrticuldrly one in the aature of Wit of Mcrndamus declanng the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not rec:eiuing the applicatian form and release the indtuidud seruice connectian to the petttioner, the Ptot No.833, in Surueg Nos.l1/14 to 11//18, admeasuing S4O Sq. gard-s, sihaated at Si Swamg AgAappa CD,O7. HousitLg Societg Ltd., Khanamet (V), Seilingampallg (M), Rdnga Reddg Dbtict, 7.5., bounrled by Norttu ptot No.832; Soutlt 30' fi, Wide Rood; Edst: Guttq.la Beqlnpet V lage Bourulary; West: Plot No.834., as illegal, nulL uoid, drbirary and con_sequentlg direct the respond.ents to receiue application dnd to release the indiuidual seru(e connection wihout being influenccd bA the tnstnlctions of the Vh respondent and fo pass_ . . "

2. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government Pleader for Energr for respondent No. 1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 6; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.7. With their consent, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.32614 of 2015, dated 18.12.2015, and requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also. I 2 1 PIi,J \ \i,'p lqor6 2025 --.'. \ l The same is not seriously disputed by the learned Government Pleader as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents

4. In vieu. of the above submissions and for the :-easons alike in the order of this Court in W.p.No.32614 oI 2OlS, dated 18.t2.2O1i, this Writ petition is disposed of permitting thc petitioners to file an online application seeking electricity service connection to the petitioners, subject premises i.e., ?lot No.g33, in Survey Nos. 1 t / 14 to 7l / 1g, admeasuring 54O Sq. l,ards, situated at Sri Swam_v Ayyappa Co_Op. Housing Society Ltd.. Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Rang.a Reddy District, Telanganzr State, within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of the copy of this order- Upon receipt of such an apprication, responcr.nt Nos.2 to 6 are directed to consider the said application of the 1>etitioners for release of thc electricily power supply to the petitic,ners, subject property u.ithin a period of two (2) weeks thereafter. It is however observed that if respondent Nos.2 to 6 pass orders on petitioners, application granting release of the electricity power ,.,upply to the petitioners' subject property, the same shalr be subject to further direction that may be issued by the State of Telangana or the Hon'ble Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated I2.O9.2O12 passed in Writ petition \o.2O4O7 of 2008 and batch. { !FiiF..-ry&s..!ra, i I 7 3 PK,J wp 19996 2025 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/- T.VIJAY KUMAR EPUry REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1 2 J 4 5 7 B I n 1 1 1 12 t Secretariat, The Principal Secretary Power and Energy Depart Hyderabad, State of Telangana -500022. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited., Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southerh Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, TGSPDC L, Ranga Reddy District. fhe. Asgt Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, T G S P D C L, Ranga Reddy District. ffredsJislinlengineer, SE/Oir/GHyD EastAE op Ailapur, T G S p D C L, Ranga Reddy District. The Commissioner, Grealer Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District. One CC to SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL [OPUC] One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHIUC [OPUCJ Two CD Copies PSK. PSK HIGH COURT DATED:1110712025 ORDER WP.No.19996 of 2025 CC TODAY F{ .$s' 1\ lt1 $ l. ( ./ k 9/H Y 9Q DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \\

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments