High Court · 2025

flff i1i$*",,1"',i,#*rt.fir*1r{t+jl*t#:H}ht{;:i{ IA NO: 20F 2025 Petition under Section-151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support or tne petiiiJn, i#H;.C stav against tn" slffi up of the factory foi .r:",YI.T:v be pleased to grant ("Factory") by pre Unioui lrnoralerivaiJli;i#,J]?".,1.,j:"L""j. i,t.; ;fl[,pJ n-oinrno,, Mandat. wanaparthy ;::ll,:i,,r, 'sanri,.eaoipai;"viiffi, vicinity of Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. DURGA GANDHAM BOSE Counsel for the Respondent no.1: cp FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRAT'ON 9:lnl_tff ,tre Respondent No.2: SRr S. SWATHT Acp FOR TRRtGATtoN OEPARTMENT Counsel for the Respondent No'3: SRI MURALTDHAR REDDY KATRAM GP FOR REVENUE 3ff HeJl"i#;,t',i,ifi lHBl:33iiil3;'%H''#"TSF'''\ffi i'*"NGFoR ndent No's: SRI ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD SC FOR SRI P. SRI RAGHU RAM REPRESENTING counsel for the ResPo TS POLLUTI ON CONTROL BOARD Counsel for the ResPondent NO'6: FOR SRI VY AN IL KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER .sf. I I oN' c HON' PE s AND I GIl ON NO .2062l OF 2025 ORDER: per u@ Hon bLe Lhc CttiE Justice Sri Apot esh Kurnar Singtl) Heard Mr. Durga Gandham Bose, learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. G.Veera Swamy, Ieamed Govemment Pleader for General Administration appearing for respondent No. l, Ms. S.Swathi, learned Assistant Government pleader for Irrigation Department appearing for respondent No.2, Mr. Muralidhar Reddv Katram, Iearned Goverrrment Pleader for Revenue appearing lbr respondent No.3. Mr. B.Muka5.ee, jeaLrned counsel representing for Mr. G.Praveen Kumar, learned DepuLy Solicitor General o[ India appearing for respondent No.4. Mr. Zeeshal Adnan Mahmood, learned Standing Counsel for TS Pollution Control Boarcl appearing for respondent No'S and Mr' p.sri Raghu Ram, leamed Senior counsel fepfesenting for Mr. V.V.futl Kumar, learnecl counser ror resPondent No.6. t :, I i I I ! I i I I t I I I I I I t I 2 Petitioners ctaiming themselves to be the residents of 2 Sankireddypally Village, Kothakota Mandal' Wanaparthy District have preferred this writ petition with the following grounds of violation of statutory Air (Prevention and Control of guidelines under the Poilution) AcL, lg8l and the Water (Prevention and Control prayer, raising several of Potlution) Act, 197 4 M-damus declaring the issuance "a) to issue a Wri[, order or direction to the resoondents and more pa-rticularly in lhe nature ol *;i';i ^ C;;""i for Establishment of the Factory ut tl'.t-!ltg ia"- Oia". No. I15I-MBNR /TSPCB/Zo L{\D/CFE/. TS-iPASS/2024-38 dated April 3' 2024 uncler 'J3eo CaLeporv, as a-rbitrary, illegal' capricious ancl ln violaiion of Articles 14.21 of the Conslitution ol t" \'iolation of Article 48A and Article iiiil^ ".J S f n($ tOpSp) of the Constitution of India; b) to cancel the aliotment and sale of land .a-J",r.i.rg Acs.4O.O0 guntas in Sy No'17-4/-25/ -sankireddlpalle village' Kothakota ;';i;i;: r,,irrarr, wrr^parthy District sold to respondent No.6 vide Sale Deed No 15I5/2O23; c) to direcL respondent Nos l Lo 5 to aliot land is no tkrreat of potlution lo the people in *t ".i'tf'r"." where there is no threat to the water g"""irl ".a 8"J,"", agriculture in lieu of the land in {v i.t z +|zU t / | /2 / 3' sankireddipalle - village' ilolirrf.ott rufrt dal, Wanaparthy District; and d) pass such other orders or directions as this Uorr'Ui"^ Court may deem it fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case'" @v ,/ I 3 i I I I I I Standing Consent

3. Mr. Zeeshal Adnan Mahmood, learned Counsel for respondent No.5, has referrerl to Order for Establishment, dated 03.04.20;24 and also the provisions of Section 2B of the Water (prevention and Control of pollution) Act, 7974, ar:Ld Section 3l of the Air fPrevention ancl Control of Pollution) Act, l9B I arrcl submitted that if the pefitioners are aggrieved by the Consent Order lor Establishment, they should i121rs approached the Appellate Authority constituted under the aforesaid Acts. representing respondent vehemenUy opposed

4. kamed Senior Counsel No.6-industry has also maintainability of the wri t petition at this stage on the ground that the peutioners have not approached the statutory authority, if at all they are aggrieved 5. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petiuoners Mr. Durga Galdham Bose seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to approach the statutory authori$ under the aforesaid Acts. I I l 1 l \ I I I 4

6. With the aforesard liberty' the instant Writ PeUtion ls dismissed as withdrawn' However' there shall be no order pending, if artY' shall as to costs' aPPlications Miscellaneous stand closed' //TRUE COPY// SD/.A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECT FICER To,

1. One CCto SRI' DURGA GANDHAM BOSEAdvocate [OPUC] 2. OneCC to SRI V V ANIL KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD SC FOR TS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD TOPUC]

4.oneCCtoSriGadipraveenKumar,DeputySolicitorGeneraloflndia[oPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR GENERAL ADIvIINISTRATION 'High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

6. Two CCs to GP for IRRIGATION' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

8. Two CD CoPies KKS LS 'K I I ! I I I I , I I I t I I , I : i , i i j I , t ' I I I I I , HIGH COURT DATED:24 t}tt2}2s t ,: ',.t.. - _ ::-_'::='\ L_-,.1._--, ,: .. ]. -\. rJ a. 10 sEP 206 C', \/,'\ (f i) / i' D4rcp t.- c t ORDER WP.No.20621 ot 2O2S DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS (+ co\ \b