Uppununthala Laxminarayana, Sio Eshwaraiah v. Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 19907 OF 2025 Between: Uppununthala Laxminarayana, Sio Eshwaraiah, Aged 53 yrs., Ocg Agiiculture, R/o H.No. B-1-20711211, Mailardevpally, Rajendernagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Native' of Vankeshwaram Village, Padara Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. ...PETITIONER AND Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue 2. The District Collector, Nagarkurnool District.
The Tahsildar, Padara Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.
The Revenue lnspector, Padara Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.
Uppununthala Narayana @ Naraiah, S/o. Ambaiah, Aged about.60 yrs-, Occ. Agiiculture, R/o. Vahkeswaram Village, Padara Mandal, Nagarkurool District - 509201. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the panchanama report in N12712023 Dt. 0210212023 conducted by the Respondent No.3 and 4 thereby declaring that the Respondent No.5 is in possession of the agricultural property admeasuring Ac.0-20 gts in Sy. No-360/E/A2l1 situated at Vankeswaram Village, Padara Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, without issuing any notice to the petitioner as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction and violative of Art. 300-4 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside panchanama report in N12712023 Dt.0210212023 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou rt may' be pleased to suspend the operation of the panchanama report in N127 12023. Dt 0210212023, pending disposai of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V. YADU KRISHNA SAINAIH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: GP FOR REVENUT: Counsel for the Respondent No.S:- The Court made the following: ORDER ,,-=a HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE i{.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION N0.19907 0F 2025 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, after arguing at length, learncd ccunsel lor the pctitioner s€eks permission of this Court to withdraw the prcsent wr.it petition \4,ith liberty to pursue remedies as available under lai,v
Permission is accorded to u,ithdraw the writ petition
3. Accordingljr. the'.vrit petition is disrnisseci as g,ithdrar.'.n rvith liberty as praye d lcr Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pencling in this -,r,rit petition shall stand closed. No costs SD/. A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REG STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI FFICER To, Hyderabad [OUT] 'I One CC to SRl. V. YADU llBlslNA SATNATH, Advocate tOpUCl 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State'of Tetahgana at 3. Two CD Copies BM PSK HIGH COURT DATED:1110712025 ORDER WP.No.19907 of 2025 I t ) /, .' '' - =];I.--- .s- . Lr,r,- J ; i\ rF \\ r,^ '.. ..: . 1E stP 2$25 \ -' " -11:.g1,,1 '=:--- .- -_.-:r" / DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS (A- \s { I
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.