Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- GODA RAGHURAM, P V SANJAY KUMAR
Outcome
Dismissed
petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the respondents in seeking to revise the 2nd respondent Board into 8 Wards from the existing 7 Wards and finalizing the Electoral Rolls 2007, as arbitrary, illegal, non-application of mind to the relevant facts, violative of the procedure contemplated under the Cantonments Act, 2006 and violative of Article 243-P of the Constitution of India and the Judgments of the Apex Court as well as this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed with the revision of Wards and finalization of the Electoral Rolls of the 2nd respondent and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel PRASAD the Petitioner:MR.C.V.R.RUDRA Counsel MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY GEN) Respondent No.: (ASST SOLICITOR The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Operative part
(Per GR,J) It is represented by Sri C.V.R.Rudra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, that the cause in this writ petition does not survive. Recording the said representation, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J ________________________ P.V.SANJAY KUMAR, J Sept ember 23, 2008 CVRK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Cantonments Act, 2006.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.