Srinivis Raju V,-S/o v. Bhasker Raju, Age S
Case Details
Acts & Sections
1. chitraouri Row House owners welfare Association, Regd. No.866/2020 havind its office at LIG - 1 1, Fla!no.10,1 Dr.-M. Prabhakar Reddy L.;hrtrapun C;6"-y,-M;ikonoa Jasir, HYDERABAD - s00 104. R"J' bY,its Presrdent J' Ravin6ianath Tagore S/o J. Madhusudhan Rao, Rl,/o Row House No l a/' Chitraouri Colonv, Hvderabad - 500 104. z F.rr,irTniri nrol sl6.srtvanarayna Murthy, Age 63 years, Membership No' - i+SO , Row House No.45,'Chitra[ruri Colony, Hyderabad ' Occ Artist' : sunil Valamanchili. S/o i. Prasida Rao, iged 45 yrs M' NO 8669 Fl/o Row House -17, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad . Occ Artist' 'p.t-., Sfo lnna Reddv, Age. 78 Yrs, M.No. 3000.RJo RH -26' a ir,rrireOOv s l. nalnJrJ*if,iasiore, S/o J. Madhusudhan Rao, Age 68 years, Fl/O Row Raina Krishniiah, aged 61 Yrs.-M No' 3885 RyO RH - 43' O Hari Anumolu, z vinoJSira M., s'16 M.A. Chowdary, Age 52 Years, M.No. 392, R/o RH-47' 8 5;iii1J-Reddv.V,'slb. Krishna Reddv, aged 54-Yrs MN03281Rl/o' RH -48 - Cnitrapuri Col6ny , HYDERABAD - 500104. Occ Dance director' S 5i"; lt[aget*ara'Rro, S/o Narasrmha Rao aged 60 Yrs' tril No 726' R/o RH- - ot Cf itiaouri Colonv. Hvderabad - 500104 Occ. Film Director' ro.Siior,ai'l-ietigrnti,'sld J. Ramachandra Murthy,-^aged 60 yrs' tvl No' rr.kiraii-xunia. k'aaamniri, S/o KV Satvanaravana ttlyl!'y'^ns". Q0 vears' 59 Yrs, M No'713' Rl/o RH- rZ.kamei*ar Rao Boyapati, Sio Sitaramiiah, 13.S;ieAhiGou, Slo'flai6, Rama Rao, aged 58 yrs M No 3912' R/o RH 92' r+.ilinalsni eogin6;i,'slo krisrrna Rao , ag-ed.61 Yrs' M No 58, Rl/o RH- 95' ts Satvafiaravana Heddv, S/o M- Sriniva's Reddy aged 64 Years' M No 36'13 Fl/o - 'hari Rao aged 58 Yrs, M' No 5092' R/o RH- 97' t6 iiaia Daooroiti. S/o D. Sri - rz.Asno-fiXumir k, Slo'Ramanandam K, aged 62yrs' M'No 5094, RyO RH- 98' rA.fvfof i'icnand M,'S/d M- Srirama Murthy, aged 58 Yrs, M'No2998, R/o RH- lg srir<bnih Biiait<ar Rarj A,(f',lominee), S/o late Bhaskara Rao B, Age 46 years' Chitrapuri colony, Hyderabad-500104, OCC. Artist nH:s6, Crrltrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-S00104. Qcc Cameraman Cnitrapuiitblony, Hyderabad - 500104' occ. Film Artist' Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad. Occu. Film Artist' -^ 1 '1 1 Chitraouri Colonv. Hvderabad -5001 04' Occ Cameraman 963,RyO.RH-76, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad - 500104 Occ Artrst' ir,r.r.r" gsl nyo nn-zz, Chitrapuri Colony,-Hyderibad-500104 occ Artist 89, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad --500104 Occu. Artist Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad- 500104, Occu. Film.artist Ry; Rn- 1 12, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-500104' Occ Employee' -aged ,
20.l\rlahender Reddy M, S/o Ramachandra reddy age 50 Yrs,Occu. r\rtist, M NO- 7977 NO RH- 120, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad- 500'104. 21 .Raiitha Marri, W/o M. Mohan Reddy, Age 55 Years M.No.6863, R/O.RH-132, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-5001 04,Occ. Artist.
22.Raghdnath Meduri, S/o. Ivl Bapanaiah Age 54 Yearrs M.No.1600,F/0 RH-134' Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-500104, Occ. Artist.
23.Srinivis Raju V,-S/o. V. Bhasker Raju, Age S9Years ,V.No.649, R/O.RH-132, Chitraouri Colonv. Hvderabad-5001 04, Occ. Artist.
24.Jaya bharath Reddi, S/o Gopala Reddy Age 57 yrs. Ir{.No. 3538, R/o RH- 1 37, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-S00104. Occ. Artiste.
25.Krishna tvlohan Reddy P.S., S/o Pappi ReddyAge 6{3 Yrs, It4.No.3042, Rl/O RH- 155, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-S0O104. Occ. Co- Director.
26.Ravi Duggirala, S/o D.V. Kumarbabu, Age 46 Years M.No.5100, R/O RH- '168, Chifr-puri Colony, Hyderabad-S00'104. Occ. Artiste. 2T.Sisupal Reboy u, sl<i. tr/. Gopat Reddy aged 77 Years, tM.No. 309, RyO.RH- '169, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-SO0104. Occ. Artist.
28. Priyanka Avula, W/o. Yashwant, Age 36 Years, R/o. RH- 17u, Chitrapuri 29. Polkam Chandra Shekar, S/o. Narsaiah, Age 61 Years, R/o RH-202, Colony, Hyderabad-S0O1 04. Occ. Private Service. Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-500104. Occ. Business.
30. Malleswarao Bulusu, S/o Subba Rao, Age 53 Years. M.No. 6546, FyO RH- 203, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad-S0O'104. Occ. Artisl. 3l.Raviraja Pinisetty, S/o. Srirama Murthy, Age 69 Years, tt/.No.4210, R:/o RH- 204, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad - 500 104. Occ. Direrctor.
32.V rjaya Kotagiri(Nominee), W/o Gopala Rao Kotagiri, {9e 62 Years ,M.No 896 R/o'RH- 88, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad - 500'104.Or:c. House Wife. AND ...PETITIONERS
1. The State of Telangana. Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department Dr.B R. Ambedkar Telangana State Scretariat Buildings Hyderabad.
2. Hyderabad N,4etropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), Rep by its Commissioner,Swarna layanthi Complex, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500008.
3. The I\/unicipal Commissioner, Manikonda lvlunicipality l\,4anikonda, R. R. District.
4. The Telugu Cine Workers Chitrapuri Coopeiative Housrng Society Ltd , Rep., by its President Sri. Anil Kumar Vallabhaneni Regd.No TBC-608, Chitrapuri Hllls, tvlanikonda Jagir, Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dtstrict. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in ttle nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 herein in the Petitionerrs vide Notice issuing Speaking Order to No.6806/33/G1/TPS/[UNK/2025, dated 27-06-2025 under Section 178 (20) and 180 (1) of Telangana t\,4unicipalities Act 2019 by directing the 2-32 petitioners herein to restore the Row houses as per the approval givern by the Htl,4DA to an L"*" ' extent of 1536 Sq.feet ( Built up area) and remove the additional unauthorized construction apart from the approved built up area to an extent of 1536 Sq Feet within (15) days from the date of receipt of the Speaking order, as arbitrary illegat, high handed, capricious, violate the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Articles 14 and 21 and the guarantee under Article 300 of the Constitution of lndia apart from being violation of principles of Natural Justice, and fair play and the law laid down by the Honourable supreme court of lndia and also this Honourable court and also pending approval of the revised building permission of HMDA, and consequently it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to suspend the speaking order vide NQ.6B06/33/G'1 ITPS/MNt</2025, dated 27-06- 2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent and direct the Respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession of the 2-32 petitioners Row houses in any manner whatsoever including demolition or by dispossessing the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition. IA NO :'l OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the speaking order vide No. 6806/33/G1/TPS/MNK/2025, daled 27-06' 2025 issued by the 3rd Respondent and direct the Respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession ol lhe 2-32 petitioners Row houses in any manner whatsoever including demolition or by dispossessing the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. UMA DEVI NAMA Counsel for the ResporTdents No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.2: SRI V.SIDDHARTH GOUD FOR counset for the Respondents No.3: SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI, sc FoR MPCL Counsel for the ResPondents No.4: - SRI V.NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA ' The Court made the following: ORDER L"" THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VTJAYST]NREDDY WRIT PETITION No.19906 OF 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) Heard Mrs. Uma Devi Nama, leamed counsel for the petitioners, Mr. V. Siddharth Goud, leamed counsel, representing Mr. V. Narsimha Goud, leamed standing counsel ibr the HMDA, appearing for respondent No.2, and Mr. Laxmaiah Kanchani, leamed standing counsel for respondent No.3 - Municipality.
2. Mr. V. Narsimha Goud, leamed standing counsel for the HMDA, and Mr. I-axmaiah Kanchani, learned standing counsel for respondent No.3 - Municipality, have taken preliminary objection to the maintainabitity of this writ petition and contended that individual speaking orders have been passed against each o1'the petitioners, thus, single writ petition is not maintainable .
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of I I the same objection taken by the leamed standing counsel for respondent No.2 - HMDA, and the leamed standing counsel for respondent No.3 - Municipatity, on the previous date of hearing, I.A. No.2 of 2025 has been filed seeking amendment ol prayer. \ L .h?.\ l __ -- .l 2 4 It is not dispute that individual show-cause notices have been issued to the petitioners. Thus, it would be appropriate for the petitioners to file separate writ petitions challenging the individual show-cause notices instead of filing a single urit petition.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners, to file individual writ petitions challenging the speaking orders. There shall be no order as to As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY TANT REGISTRAR A ECTION OFFICER \ l
2. 3
4. tU;;;bil Metropolitan Development Authoritv. (HMDA)' The Principal Secretary' Muncipal Administration and Urban Development o.irrir"iioi.B R. AmbedkarTelangana State Secretariat Buildings Hvderabad, State of Telanqana' rt;t;;;i;i;;;; i;;;i;;;;ihi comptex, Sanleeva Reddv Nagar Road' Srinivasa Nagar' Ameerpet, HYderabad-500008 fi-i" ftr,]niiipdf CommissionLr' Manikonda Municipality ltlanikonda' R.R.District. id F;i;;"t Sri. Anil Kumar Vallabhaneni Regd.'No'TBC-608' Telugu Cine w;ri;;Chitrrprri coopeiiiiue Housing Societv Ltd ' til;;i6;d; l;;L: Vi r r . One CC to M/4. UMA DEVI NAMA' Advocate lgP-y.ul . i;; 6c;1"'Gc Fon rracpf Aorvfi.r a uneaN oev, Hish court for the State of Telanqana, at HYderabad. IOUTI cj";idi; Sir V (Ansrr'rrHn'coub, sc-qol1lYPc to.?q9,1^. . il; dd i" Siii iAir',rntAn xatlcnnul, sc FoR MPCL [oPUC] . Two CD CoPies j g", Ga nd i p9t Ma nid a l, Rgrp,q Red d v D istrict' chikapuri Hills' To
1. o 7 o I PSK- TKS HIGH COURT DATED:1410712025 ORDER WP.No.19906 of 2O2S ' ^-.-\'-r \ 0B sEP 216 _a!, i.'.-l ,)r DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a lrd l8