High Court · 2025

7. Mr.D.St^rdhakar, S/o not known to the petitioner Age Major, Occ Circte lnspector of Police Mancherial Police Station Mancherial, Adilabad District. 8. Mr.A.Ashok, S/o not known to the petitioner Age Major, Occ Sr.rb-lnspector of Police Marrcherial Police Station Mancherial, Adilabad District.

9. Seggam Ravi Kurnar, S/o China Mallaiah Aged about 32 years, Occ Real Estate Business Ri/o H.No. 23-14, Sri Sri Nagar Marrcherial, Mancherial District ...RESPONDENTS I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) To declare the inaction of the respondent No. 5 in providing Police Aid to the petitioner No. 1 and 2 as per the Civil Courts order by taking the legal action against the respondents No. 9 as per the complaint dated 03-06- 2017 is arbikary and illegal, b) To Declare the high handed action of the respondents in colluding together and deterring the petitioners to enforce their right of asking police aid by arraying the petitioners No.2 and 3 as accused in false criminal case is arbitrary and illegal c) Consequently issue a direction to the respondent No.s to provide Police - aid to the petitioners. t.A. NO: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to the FIR No./331 of 2017 dl. 07-07-2O17; on the file of the respondent No.s pending disposal of the Writ petition. t.A. NO: Petition under Section 15'l CPC pralng that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the respondent No.s not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners basing on the counter complaints lodged by the gth respondent before the sth respondent including in Crime No. 331 ot 2017 in the interest of iustice. Gounsel for the Counsel for the Respondent No.l to 6: SRI R.L,/AXMIKANTfI REDOY, KOTESHWARA PRASAD (.- "*,..,} The Court made the following: ORDER E r'" THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking for the following relief, "pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus- a) To tleclare the inaction o./ the respondent No. 5 in providing Police Aid to tlrc petitioner No. I and 2 as per the Civil Courts order by nking the legal action against thc respontlents No. 9 as per the complaint dated 03-06-2017 is arbitrary and illegal. To Declare the high handed dction of the respondents in colluding together and deterring the petitioners to enforce their right of asking police aid by arraying the petttioners No.2 and 3 as accused in false criminal cusc is arbitrary and illegal c) Consequently issue a direction to the resporulcnt No.5 to provide Police -aid to the petitioners and to pass".

2. None appeared for the petitioners.

3. Heard Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. I to 6

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader fbr [{ome submits that, although the petitioners initially sought policc protection and challenged their being shown as accused in the criminal proceedings, this Court, by interim order dated 21.07.2017, had already directed the respondent police not to summon the \ t I \ \ 2 petitioners to the police station except in accordance with due process o[ Iaw. He further contends that, as the petitioners are no longer pressing the matter, it appears that their grievance has been effectively redressed pursuant to the said interim direction. Accordingly, he prays that appropriate final orders be passed.

5. I have carefully perused the material placed on record.

6. Upon consideration of the submissions advanced and noting that the petitioners are not pressing the matter in view of the interim order dated 21.07.2017, this Court is of the view that the grievance of the petitioners stands substantially resolved by the interim order. [{ence, this court is of the view that it would be just and appropriate to make the interim order dated 21.07.2017 absolute. ordered accordingly. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed ol. There shall be no order as to costs. Pcncling rniscellaneous applications, if any, shatl stand closed. ,,TRT'E COPY// To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department Telangana. I Sd/.L.VIJAYA LA)(MI REGISTRAR OFFICER Hyderabad, State of

2. TheAdditional Director General of Police, Law and Order, State of Telangana' Hyderabad.

3. The Commissioner of Police, Ramagundarn Police Commissionerate' Karimnagar.

4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Mancherial division, Mancherial District' 5. The Station House Officer, Mancherial Police Station, Mancherial' Mancherial District. I I I i I !1 O. Iltu .Sub-llspecbr of Police, Mancherial Police Station Mancheriat, Mancherial District.

7. one cc to sRITHADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD, Advocate topucl 8. Two ccs to GP FoR HOME, Higrh court for the State of relangana at Hyderabad TOUTI I

9. Two CD Copies BSR PMK I HIGH COURT DATED:08/09/2025 t \ \ I ORDER I WP.No.24052 of 2017 1HE SIh rr ,_, ( o flz il0ll 2025 $\ .i.. PalCr-tf- 'e t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS Ittlu' IO