✦ High Court of India · 23 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,029 words

Smt.lVl. Shoba Rani @ Jyothi, Wio. M. Ram Reddy, aged about 48 years, Rl/o H.No. 1 1-2- 1 621112, Mailargadda, Secunderabad ...PETITIONER AND Department, having office at Secretariat, Hyderabad.

1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl. Secretary, Panchayath Raj 2. Dist. Collector, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 3. The District Panchayath Officer, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 4. MPDO, Koilkonda lvlandal, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 5. Secretary, Grampanchayat, Kanaiapally Village, Koilkonda Mandal, Itrlahaboobnagar Dist.

6. Assistant Electrical Engineer, Koilkonda Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 7. Damai Pally Ravi, S/o. D. Chennappa, aged about Malor, Occ Not Known 8- Bala Raja Mani, W/o. Bala Raikamaiah, aged about Major, Occ not Known, 9. .Palle Nagappa, S/o. P.Ballaiah, aged about Major, Occ Not Known, 10.Golla Raju, S/o. Chunna Balaiah, aged about Major Occ Not Known, 'l l.Yerkali Venkatamma, Wo.Ramulu, aged about Major, Occ Not Known, 12. Pasula Keshavulu, S/o. P. Ramulu, aged about Major, Occ Not Known 13. Damaipally Keshavulu, S/o.D. Chennappa aged about [\,4ajor, Occ Not Known, 14.Bala Laxmamma, W/o. Bala Shekar aged about Major, Occ Not Known, '15. Pasula Padmama, W/o.Yadaiah, aged about Major Occ Not Known 16.Kavali Raju, S/o. Kavali Ramaiah, aged about Major, Occ Not Known ( M All the respondents 6 to 15 Fl/o. Kanayapally Village, Koilkonda Mandal, ahaboobnagar Dist') ...RES'.NDENTS ( All the respondents 7 to 15 Fi/o Mahaboobnagar Dist.) Kanayapally Village, Koilkonda Mandal, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or writs more particularly in nature of Mandamus there by declaring the action of the respondent Nos 3 and 4 herein in allowing the respondents 7 to 16 herein in changing the nature of 1 permanent constructions as illegal arbitrary and conse respondents 3 & 4 herein to not to allow any type of construc of the petitioner to the extent of Ac. 01-15 Gts in Sy. No Village, Koilkonda Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Dist., in the inter roperty by way of quently direct the :ions in the property 166 of Kanayapally rst of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the I rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to direct the respondent No.6 herein to not to grant any permiss ons for the purpose of electricity connections in the property to the extent of Ft. 01-15 Gts., in Sy No. 166 of Kanayapally Village, Koilkonda Mandal, It4e raboobnagar Dist., pending disposal of the above WP in the interest of justice lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou r may be pleased to direct the Respondent numbers 3 and 4 herein to not 1( allow any type of constructions in the land to the extent of Ac. 01 -15 Gts. in Sy. No. 166 of Kanayapally Vitlage, Koilkonda Mandal, lt4ahaboobnagar D lt., pending disposal of the above WP in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NYAYAPATHI PRASHANT Counsel for the Respondent No. 1&3: GP FOR PANCHAYA l RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMETI - Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4&5: SRI K. PRADEEP Fll :DDY, SC Counsel for the Respondent No.6: AGP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7to15: SRI E. PHANI KLll IAR The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.2O896 OF 2025 ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fi1ed a Ietter dated 15. 10.2025. before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdravi' the present writ petition stating as under: "With rekrence to the aboue subject cited I would like to subnit as follows W.P.No.20B96 of 2025 uas f;led agatnst the Panchagat Raj and others and W.P.no.34167 of 2024 utas filed against the reuenue authoities the ponchayt raj matter list before Justice T. Madhaui Deui. At the time of hearing the natter it u,ta.s brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Judge stating that another connected matter uide W.P.No.34167 of 2O24 tuhich uas ftled against reuenue department, to be tagged cLlonq tuittt the W.P.No.2O896 of 2025. The Hon'bLe Justice tuas pleased to direct the registry to post both the matters after taking necessarA pennission from Hon'ble Chief Justice. In the meantuhile, tlrc pafties irt the both the W.P's i.e., our client and unofftcial respondent sLtaue compromised the mal.ter, a-s such tue haue been requested to u;ithdraw the m.a.tte rs be-fore the Hon'ble I i I .1 Court. Alreadg two times the matter u.tas r before Hon.'ble Justice 'l'.L4adhaui Deui, tt the Hon'ble Court u.tas pleased fo lssue slrps. Bu.t, houteuer, the matters were tL before the Court for uithdraual. As 13.10.2025, tuhen tue haue mentioned tl once ogorn before the court, Hon'ble J 't pleased to direct us to address a lette registrar. Therefore, u)e request gou to kindly post i matters before l{on'ble Justice T. MadhrLu ',entioned \ereupon trc Court tt posted such on e motter 7ge uas r to tLLe \.ese tuo Deui or before the Hon'ble Court where the roster is t lere. "

2. Permission is accorded

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is c ismissed as u,ithdraw,n. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, if any, pendir g in this writ petition, shail stand closed. sd/-A.h /cSI .;. GOWRI SHANKAR S ISTANT REGISTRAR \. \ 'JsEcfloN oFFIcER ,TRUE COPY// To,

1. One CC to SRl. NYAYAPATHI PRASHANT, Advocate CPUCI 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV: -OPMENT ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUTI 3. Two CD Copies BM (r PIUK HIGH COURT DATED:2311012025 I ORDER WP.No.20896 of 2025 -<t' , :. :,. /t, t' 0l r:c 2625 ...-.,, l, "\tj. ' ,.\-_-..-, .':.n.'/ i? DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS V WITHOUT COSTS (A \L \\ o\ 'ITHDRAWN

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments