The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to deposit the decreetar amounts as per the Judgment and Decree passed in the op No.15 0f 2003 dated.30.12.2005 0n the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal and on paw with G.O.Rt.No.274 lrrigation and cAD (LA) Department Dt. 30.08.2022 pending disposar of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner : SRI ALLTKA SURESH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI DHARAVATH RAVI, ASST, GP FOR IRRI & COMM AREA DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Gp FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No.3,4&5 : Ms.RAGHA SANDEEPTHI REDDY, AGP FOR LA The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. t9759of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Dharavath Ravi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing on behalf of respondent No'1 and Ms.K.Radha Sandeepthi Reddy' learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.3,4and5.withtheconsentoftheparties,thewritpetition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself'

2. This writ petition is filed with the following prayetl "declaring the action of the Respondents in not depositing the decreetal amount s as per the Judgment and Decree passed. in the OP'No'15 of 2OO3 dated 30.12.2005 on the file of the Sgnior Ciuil Judge Gadual and G.O'Rt'No'274 lrigation ond CAD (LA) Department Dt.3O'OB'2022 in spite of G'O issued bg the l't respondent till not depositing the same b11 State is illegal, cirbitrary and uiolatiue of the pinciples of natural justice and respondents to dePosit Judgment and Decree passed in OP'No'LS of 2023 DI.3O.12.2OO5 on the file of the Senior Ciuil Judge Gadwal." consequentlg the amount direct as per 2 I Village, Etikyala

3. Brief facts in this writ petition are that petitioners claims to [g 6\^,ns1s and possessors of the lands in Sy.Nos.223/2, 224/2, 25/2, 2OZ/2, 21g/2, 226/2 and 23t/2 toan extent of land Ac.9-O2 gts., situated at putandoddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadnal District. It is submitted that the respondent authorities had acquired the petitioners, land ulde notification dated Og.02.2001 for formation of priyadarshini Jurala project. The possession was taken by respondent No.5 on 27.02.1995 and Award was passed uide Award No. 15 of 2O0I dated 2g.09.2001 awarding compensaticn of Rs.29,OO0/- per acre. Aggrieved by the award dated 2g.Og.2OO j, petitioners made appiication under Section 1g of the Land Acquisition Act ald the ci as O.p.No. 15 of 2003 on the file of Senior . The said O.p u,as alioq,ed by enhancing the Judgment and decree dated 3O. 12.2OOS and Decree dated 30.12.2OOS, bearing L.A.A.S.No.420 of 2006 , aad this Court uide order dated 19.O9.2073 partly allowed the appeal. F-rrsuant to the same, respondent No. 1 has sanctioned the award amount arlci issued G.O.Rt.No.274 Irrigation and CAD (LA) Department dated 3O.O8.2O22 However, respondent authorities have not deposited the award amount the Judgment respondents preferred appeal before this Court, compensation uid.e Civii Judge, Gadwal same was numbere Challenging J even after issuance of G.O. Aggrieved bY the same, this writ petition is filed'

4. Learned'counsel for the petitioners had drawn attention of this Court to Judgment passed tn Bimidipati Annapoorna Bhaooni Vs' Land Acquisition O;fficer' Yeluru Reseruoir Proiect PeddoPuram' East Godauari, A'P' and othersr ' wherein direction was given to the respondent authorities therein to deposit the compensation amount' Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that while dealing with the similar circumstance this Court in W'P'No'29 42 of 2025 uide order dated 03.O2.2025, passed the following order:- .6. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made bg the respectiue parties ' this Court deems it appropiate to dispose of the utit petition' directing the respondents to paA/ deposit the amount auard.ed by the learned' Senior Ciuil Judge' Naraganpet in LAOP No'24 of 2017' within a penod of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copg of tltis order'"

5.LearnedAssistantGovernmentPleaderappearingfor resPondents submits that appropriate orders be passed in this writ Petition' , 2005(3)AL.T -233 (LB) ( I t h- \

6. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either side ald in terms of the order dated 03.O2.2O25 passed in W.p.No.2942 of 2025, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to depos it/pay the amount aw-arded by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal in O.P.No.15 of 2003 dated 30. 12.2OOS as expeditiously as possible, at arty rate within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners. 7 . Accordingly, this writ petition IS disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.H.S. GOWRI SHA NKAR TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, ' U:,.5,:H'ii,i,:*f*J;:qTl"&s:gffi? proiecr wins- LAR Deparrmenr, ' lif"?J['ifl:' i,"r::",ffl;of'"ance and Plannins Department secretariar,stare 3. The Commissioner of Land Revenue, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Jogulamba Gadwal District at Gadwal. . coilector (LA), Unit_pJp/JLrp, Gadwat, Josutamba E:"._:i3?j?li"t.D"prty

6. One CC to SRt ALLTKA SURESH, Advocate. tOpUCl ' Jli^.8ff#fi.[?i rRRr AND corvM AREA DEV, Hish court ror the state 8. Two CCs to Gp FOR,LAND_ACOUISIT|ON, Hiqh Court for the State of 9. Two CCs to Gp FOR FINANCE & PLANNING, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. tOUfl Telangana at Hyderabad. IOUI*I- - - -"'-' I 'vr r' I I's

10. Two CD Copies.

4. BSK HIGH COURT DATED:14t07t2L2s ORDER WP.No.19759 of 2O2S R h'r a -.: s ,.r\'\ J t o \ 1g trul nzi j 'i DF .1' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS [9ors g f*\\\