Mrs v. Udayini, Wo. vs Sudhakar ngel agoY

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to initiate necessary periury proceedings agains[the alleged protected tenants in the bateh of eivilR.e_y_iStpn P-etitions and punish the Civil Revision Petitioners to uphgH na=aiOnny o'f=thE Hon'bie' court and atso to prevent pollution and'ftatd in fhe judicial pr6ceeOings of this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRt D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Gounsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI M PRATHEEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.36,37,41,42,97,1O5,1O7,109,110,1 13,114,116,118,121,122,124,125,126,127,12 8,132,133,134,14,151,152,164,165,167,174,176,177,179,18O,181,182,183,189'196 ,199,201 : SRIGSUMON Counsel forthe Respondent NoS.46 ,47,4g: SRI V VENU MADHAV Counset forthe Respondent Nos.54,57,63,65,67,68,75,81,151 : SRI E MADAN MOHAN RAO Counset forthe Respondent No.119 : SRI S B S RAMA SARMA CHUNDURU Counsel forthe Respondent No.129 : SRI A LAXMINARAYANA Gounsel forthe Respondent No.202: SRI MANTHRIPRAGADA VENI(ATA HANUMANTHA RAO Counset for the Respondent N os. 38, 39,73,9 5, 1 1 5, 1 1 9, 1 20, 1 30,1 35,1 36,1 40, 142,1$0,197 t SRI A BHARATH KRISHNA Counset for the Respondent Nos.20 6,207 ,208,210,211,212,213,214 : M'S. Y ASHOKRA.' 10F Petition Under section 9't of A P (T A) Tenancy and AgricUltural Lands Act, 1950 aggrieved bythe Order dated 24.09 2016 Passed in Case No.F2l60671 2013 on the file of the Court of the Joint Collector-l, Ranga Reddy District- Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah R/o. H.Nq. 19711, GiChibowli, Serilingainpally Ranga Reddy District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) 2. DGandaiah, S/o. Late Darapalli Babaiah R/o. H.No. 1-56/1, Gachibowli Mflage, Seriiingampally Ranga Reddy District (Died)

3. D. Shantamma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, Occ: Houscwife'Ep. ft.Uo.-i-Siitltb, Rajeev Nagar, Near Pocfiamma Temple, Gachibowli, R.R. District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought on record as LR of the deceased P 2 as per the Lourt order dated 24111t2gzt in l.A.No.3 ot 2o2O) :: j..;.:.-ilqt:.I:,..r,:ii'l:,-l+.?;tE:-aai:,TjI,.-f?.;.;::. 20 Agricultttre

4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years' Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chkanjeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 40 years' Occ: 6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late ,,Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, Occ: 7. M. Srikanth, s/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah Aged 35 years, occ: Agriculture 8. M. Pravallika, Dlo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years Agricultttre AII are tUo. H:No. 1-5716/1, Street l.Io.3, Serilirgarrnpally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy Ctistrict. {Petitioners No. 4 to 8 are ietitionerr No.1 as Per C.O-, 5631/2016.) on re@rd as LRs of the deceased 8.02 .2025 vide lA.No. 1/2025 in CRP. dt: P'etitionerslRespondent Nos.12 & 1 3 D I . P.Ravin<lranath Reddy, S/o. Sri P-Ramanjtrla Road, K,aflaPa. Rl/o: H.No.1/492, Smith

2.Smt.A't<..alpana,Wo.LateA.SureshBabuR/o.302,JyothiPlace,FlotNo.15' Srinagar CblonY, HYderabad.

3. Dr.Linqa Reddy Sunitha, Wo. M.S. Phani Kumar R/o. 2101, Padmaja Palace, " ilirri dJmi,i5ii Nigamigam srinagar Colonv, Hvderabad'

4.LinqaRt:ddyVenkataSuneel,Dr.L.V.SubbaReddyR/o'435'RoadNo'20' Jubllee tiills-, HYderabad.

5. tvl.Siva (ianesh' S/o. Krishna Murthy R/o. 505, Jyothiraditya, Plot No. 2' Srinagar colonY, HYderabad. 6. Smt. Ra,rhuPa lli Surekah, Wo. Sri Padmaj:r Mansion Plot No. 19, Srinagar

7. R.Anusl'a. W/o. Sri RachuPalli Yella Mansion Plot No. 19, Srinagar Colony,

8. R.Rahul S/o. Plot No 19, S 'Yella Reddy FYo. Flat No. 103' , Hyderabad. R/o No. 103, Padmaia FUo. Flat No. 103, Padmaja Mansion q sri Padi(iem Chitanva Kumar' S/o. Maltikarjuna Rao r/o' H'No 6-127-3' - M G Rozrd, Railway-Kodur Cuddapah District'

10.R.Saras'ryathiChaitra,D/o.R'LakshmiseklarReddyR/o.H.No.6-3-581'B- 303. Ket;hav oer npartmJnis fi;ailgtieolony, Khairatabad Hyderabad "ESllSliJf iJ"39,"iT"3XI;'J".*f#a3t:g:;iB'#3i'f i"l,llfi iho,i '' iG.l;;;? iz, Frrt ruo1oo, sri ruiani toviers, sBH' colonv, Srinasar colonv l2.P.Padmirvathi,W/o.LateSriPochimareddyChandraPrathpReddyRl/orPlot 13 Dr P.Sutrba Reddv, S/o. P-Bhaskar Reddy Rl/o Kapu Street' Porumamilla Hyderabad Village and lrr'landal, Cuddapah Dist 2t

14.D.Sharada, Wo. Dr. marka Reddy Rl/o. Kapu Street, Porumamilla Mllage and Mandal CuddaPah District

15.Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah, Occ: Agriculture Rlo. H'No' 1-38, '- Ci*riUoivti viuigi, Sedlingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Distrft*'

16.Gadda Sankar, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Occ: Gachibowli Village , SerilingampallY Mandal F/o. H.No. 1-38/1, Reddy District.

17.Gadda Chandraiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Occ: Agriculture R/o' H'No' 1-38/1' '''dchibowli Mllage,'serilingampally Mandal Rangb Reddy District' .18.Gadda Krishna, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Occ: Agriculture R/o' H'No' 1-38/1' ' -' CicniOowti Vittige, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 19.G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Rl/o. H.No. 1-29' Gachibowli Village, Seriliqgampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

20.Khanamet shivaiah, s/o. Khanamet Balaiah Rl/o. H.No. 1-58/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

21.Sved Kareem, S/o. lGaia, Occ: Agriculture, Gachibowli Village' S6dlingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.Md. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ: Agriculture Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

23.Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ: Agriculture Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

24.Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ:Agriculture Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

25. Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ: Agriculture Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

26.Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ: Agrrculture Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

27.Swamv. S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ: Agriculture Gachibowli Mllage' Serifinlbmpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

28.Smt. Santamma. W/o. Late Balaiah Occ: Agriculture Gachibbdi Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

29.Gadda Yettaiah, s/o. Gadda Veeraiah occ: Agriculture Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 30.Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah, Occ: Village, Serilingampa lly Mandal Ranga ReddY Gachibowli

31. Pentaia h, S/o. late Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village' Mandal Ranqa Reddy District.

32.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. B. Shankar Aged about- 60-years' --' nyii.' n.ivo.i -++, oaCtrioowli Village, Seriiingampally Mandaf District, Occ: Housewife Ranga Reddy

33.G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar, H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village Aqed about 41 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. , Serilingampall! Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 22 *fi District. ,f"lf B!i,?!?,?313*ffi llffi"e$:3?&:triff r,,4n"1",'i'ffi"#oi.oo,

35.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. H. No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Mllage;'

36.G. Prak,ash, S/o. G. Shankar H.No.'l-44, GachibowliVillage, 37.Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G- Krishna R:/o. H.l,lo.1 -44, Gachibowli Vitlage' District.

38.G H Sa No. about 35 about 45 about 32 Occ Iture Ri/o. District. strict. rict.

39.S H mt. G.:iaritha. D/o. G. Krishna .No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village, about 29 vears. Occ Housewife Rl/o. fuandit Ranga Reddy District.

40.G. JaiPe,l, Sio. G. Krishna 44, Gachibowl iVillage, .No.1- 41 .G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna' H.No.1 -14, Gachibowli Village, 42 G H Pravt:en, S/o. G. Krishna, No.1 -14, Gachibowli Village, about 25 Occ Mandal Agriculture Ranga Red dy District. R/o. about 23. Rl/o y District.

43.Spl. Gr. Dy. Collector & RDO 44.Smt. N. Sobha Rani, Wo. N. Riio. Plot No.40, Telecom Nagar, Rajendranagar DMsion,' , Occ House wife

45.V. Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Satyanarayana 119, SRT, Sanathnagar, HYderabad. Aged 53 years, Occ Business Fl/o

46. V. Prabhakar Re Busines s, Rl/o. 8 ddv, -3-31 S/o. V.D. Rama 5/3A, Maruthi Nagar, about 50 years, Occ uda, Hyderabad.

47. K. Radha Krishna Employee RJo. An Aged about 70 years, Occ Rtd. erabad. , Hvd

48. Mr. B Jhansi Lakshmi, S/o. Vasu Deva.Rao {ge{ qbou.l !5 years' Occ '" Erprov,i" Rlo. ptot Nd.175, Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli Ranga Reddy Distnct.

49. Diamonrl Hills Welfare Association, Rep. by its Secretary Sri P Narayana Reddy S/o. late P.V. Subba Reddy 5O tnl/s. Ka-.;tooa corporation, Rep. by its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar RJo. 5- -- ti-sz iop Ftoor. Kamal Hotel,'stalion Road' Nampally' Hyderabad 51 . Jornt Collector-'l , Ranga Reddy District.

52. Jang om Sujatha, Hous ew:fe, Ri/o. 1 D D. Colony, VIDE IA,NO Hydera 1t2022 bad. (R52 tS tN CRP. 563 1t2016) Aged about nt House No AS PER C.O.. Dr 1il1112024 62 years, .2-2-251P Occ 17, 23

53.B. Gopal Reddy, S/o. Sri Venkat Fl/o. Flat No. 7, Plot No. Empbyee, Hyderabad

54.K. Surekha Business, H.No.

55.8. Ashok ReddY, S/o. B. ResidencY, SBt ColonY, 65 Occ Retired Aoed about 55 vears, Occ fiahchirevula, Fvderabad. Flat No. 305, Vaishnovi's TNR 56 .Smt Beesam Shobha Rani, 11 - 410/1/4, Etemal H.K. H ARE IMPLEADED AS cRP. 5631/2016) PER C. Wo. Sri B. Ram Flat No. 301, H.No. 16 - (R53 TO R56 .2t2022lN IA.NO .13111 I 2 Petition under section 151 of cPC pfaying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the peiition, the High Court may 99-q191:"d .r"p""O tt'" operation of ihe order dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2l6067/ 2013 on the file of the Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' Counsel for the Petitioner No.l : SRt D JAGAN MOHAN RE Counsel for the Petitioner No.2 : M/S. HARENDER PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,4 & 11 : M/s' S AND S LAWASSOCIATES Counsel for the ResPondent Nos.15,17,19,26, 33 to 42 : SRI SURABH RAJ ( Counsel for the Respondent No' 49 : SRI C SUMON Counset for the Respondents No.50 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY c L N Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T'A) Tenancy and Agricultural !q{t-ld' 1950 aglrieved by the Order dated24.09.2O16 Passed in Case No.F2l6066/2013 on tne f]t6 of the court of the Joint collector-|, Ranga Reddy District. Between '1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah R/o' H'No' 1-6711' ' c"cnioo*ri, sertfinga'nrpily niir-ga nedov District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) - Virr-r661$;liingampatti nanga ileddv District (Died) 2.D.Gandaiah'S/o.LateDarapalliBabaiahR/o..H.No.1-56/l,Gachibowli 3. D. Shantamma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah' aged 68 yrs, Occ: Housewife' -RJo' H.No. 1-57l't7l8, Raieei'"N;dai t'iei|. i;bcfiJmma tempte, Gachibowli' R R' District. 24 (petitiorler No.3 is brouoht on reoord as LR of thb deceased P 2 as per the burtorderdated2il11f2o21 in l.A.No.3 of 2o2o)

4. M. Sugr.rna, Wo. Late Meinikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years, Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chiranjeevi, S/o. Late Manil(onda Y.adaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: 6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture Agriculture

7. M. Srik:anth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, Occ: Agriculture

8. M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22years All are Rl/o. H.No. 1-5716/1, Street No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy t)istrict. (Petitioners No. 4 to 8 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased ilti-t.n jir.to.i i" pdi Q.o., dt 18.62.2025 vide lA.No. 112025 in cRP. 5632 of 2016.) ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.5 & 6 AND 1. V. Gangladhar Rao, S/o. V. Veera Swamy Aged about 71 years, Occ: Retd' Employee R/o. H.No.12-2 -TOglCl&7, Padmanabhanagar Mehdipatnam'

4. 5

9. Hyderatrad. Eedupuqanti Bapineedu, S/o E Paftabhi Ramaiah'Aged 62 years, Ocr: Agriculture Rl/o. H.No. Govindaraopet, Mulugu Mandal. Warangal District' Koneru Satyanarayana, S/o. K. Sundara Ramaiah Aged 61 years, Occ: Contractor Rl/o. Raos Colony, Hanamkonda. Warangal District' K. Surer;h Babu. S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 59 years, Occ: Business, Ri/o' Gachibc,wli, Hyderabad. T. Seettramahalakshmi, Wo. T. Venkatesinar Rao Aged 61 years, Occ: Housewife Rl/o. Govada, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District. Kesineni Srilakshmi, Wo. K. Venkat Ramaiah Aged about 52 years, Occ: Househr>ld Rl/o. Champadu Mllage, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District' Yarlagatlda Jamuna, Wo. Sri Y. Pennidhi Rao Aged 58 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.NO.55-A, Telecom Nagar Gachibowli Village' Seriling:rmpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Syed Farooq Nayeem, S/o. Syed YousufAged about 49 years, Occ: Busines's, Ryo. Patelnagar, Hyderabad. Jhamurral Vatnani, S/o. Peomal Vatnani Aged about 79 years, Occ: Business R/o. H. N o. 1 5-4-67, Gowliguda Chaman, Osmanshahi, Hyderabad' 25 l0.Shehana Ajazuddin, wo. syled Ajazuddin Aged sout 49 years, Occ: Housewife R/o. H.No .1-61l4,Gachhowli Vfrlage Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District. ,

11. Parepalti Satyanarayana, S/o. Late P. Venkata Ramaiah Aged about 62 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. 6-31, Adhurapuri Colony, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad

12.Syed Akthar, S/o. Late S),ed lmam Aged about 53 year's, Occ: Business Rl/o' H. No. 9-4-6 21 1 9, N izam Colony, Tolichouki, Hyderabad.

13. M.S.S.Rao, S/o. Venkatappaiah Aged about 54 1rears, Occ: Service R/o. S.P. Road, Secunderabad.

14.Khan Ghiyasuddin Khan, S/o. Khaia Ahmed Khan Aged 57 years, Occ: Pvt. Service, R/o. H. No .2O-4-32O, Khilavath, Hyde'rabad -

15. B. Vijaya Bhaskar, S/o. B. Suryanarayana Aged about 48 years, Occ: B usiness R/o. Sivalayam Street, Satyanamyanapuram, Vijayawada 16.V. Satya Venkat Narsimha Reddy, S/o. V. Anantha Reddy Aged about 61 years, Occ. Doctor R/o. H.No.2-2-1105/15, Tilaknagar Colony, Hyderabad. l T.Kollipara Madhava Rao, S/o. K. Anjaneyulu Aged about 62 years, Occ: Retd. Service FUo. KCP Ltd., Yuwur, Krishna Dlstrlct.

18. S. Haritha, W/o. S. Venkatswara Rao Aged about 40 years, Occ: Service R/o. Charellete N.C., U.S.A, Rep. by S. Raja Rao

19. Gali Vidya Lakshmi. W/o. Chandramouli Aged about 54 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Sharada Nilayam, Srinagar Colony, Kothagudem, Khammam District. 20. Pinnamaneni Prameela Rani, Wo. P. Prasad Rao Aged about 54 years, Occ: Housewife. R/o. Sharada Nilayam, Srinagar Colony, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

21.K. Madhumathi, D/o. K. Baswa Rao Aged about 44 years, Occ: Housewife 22.K.lvladhavi D/o. K. Baswa Rao Aged about 34 years, Occ: Housewife (Respondent Nos. 21 &22 Rep. by GPA K. Baswa Rao) R/o. 4-1-12401A13, Abids, Hyderabad

23.V. Suiatha, W/o. V. Radha Krishna Aged about 57 years, Occ: Housewife R/o. H.No. 1 -1 -3361 47, Viveknagar, Hyderabad.

24.Smt. S. Vijaya Lakshmi, w/o. s. Raia Rao Aged about 61 years, occ: Housewife Rlo. V-4t403, Jaya Bharathi Gardens Moosapet, Hyderabad. 1 26

25.P. Sandhya Rani, Wo' P'NrSy' Prasad' Aged about 52 years' Occ Doctor' R/o. H.Nlo. 6 -2'STE,rjammi Banda' Khammam District'

26. Dittakavi Veg8$Ejaff ?r%i D , Lakshrnan Rao, BatchuPeta Mllage, :l1i'"*i11:,t3la?'3i3$?ffi X,T4"T,:Bi3l,f 'roff"**o W/o. Dr. D. Prabhakara Rao, Aged about 58 'r.rb. '1'["ff z+lt et o, Dargamitta, Nellore. B. Chand 2 - 29, St. rasekhar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ 'tio. i, rit"ittiva Nagar, l-iabsiguda' District. ,5i5f,

25. R/o. H usewife, years, Ctcc Smt Bitla Chandana, Wo. Housewife, R/o. H.No. t - H$eratrad.

30.Smt. Mehrunnisa Oc, Housewife, RIo' Hyderabad. D/o .No,8 -

31.S Hyderatnd. . Mahamood Hussain, Aged about 54 years' i- -1il tl , Forly Quarters, Ameerpet' ' Achyutha - 3 - 1213. Ramaiah, Aoed about 67 Years, Occ Vaman N ai[ Lard, BegumPet, .rIrs3xf['H#Ji;:e,i,[J,"8:SX"B.".J,t*.:"S,*;Xf 316?&f"?* ...fu "+J**tffi ?:6*"n,f#F?,ffn";,t3fl ,333Hlo9"1,I"ni$a3flfH1"""' .ol:ge;34,:Ri?",[$fi l.rl;5f 'r"J1:t:i:R#",$"1,'3,'lXlilFiF,iS* District. Hyderabad. 'u X;H"531[:i,31i;hil?,";, t1l8ff::fl 3,83'*,t3,"'1r1??lf :l'"uo" 36Sl1t3'ie3v-eJ?iElPi:3:5'i?l,YsHJ:?,i"?1*g$ouvears'occservice' o"" j.lL1,t-46yeans'occ az.$aveenafl !v;ptr5s:8,,"1,!fll".jtxatr8ili-t8 glt, ?:"* J""#i:lf:f,ift aB:i " bo ut 47 vears' occ Busi ness' 38' Erffil tr 39.S.V. Ramana' S/o. Lakghmaiafr' Aged.about 46- years' Occ Business' Rl/o' ""' ii:i,'EiAi.ti:s, Sintoshnasar colonv, Hvderabad' * 41.V. Anas;uya, D/o- V' Sury-anarayana' Aged 47 years' Occ Housewife' Rl/o' 1 - 42.Gulam vustafa Khan, s/o. Gulam Dastagiri Khan, Aoed about 58 years' occ R[l I: i"_"1#?lil/$;y"il*:nil,"XmoAoed 1 - 336t 4i, Viveknagar' Hyoeraoao' 64 vears' occ Housewire' service, R/o. H. No. $1 I -"tl' i i azt $'- Miiau rant'Hvderabad' 27

43.Smt. N. Lalitha, W/o. N. Raghavender, Aged qbout 44years, Occ Ho-usewi-fe, ---R/o. Plot No.40, Tebomnagar, Gactribovrdi Wlage Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District.

44. Koneru Rama Rao, S/o. Business, R/o. Vanukuru, 64 years, Occ

45.Smt. G. Ratna Kumari, W/o. G. Ramesh, Aged abo-ut S4years, 9cp - t-tousehold, Rl/o.989, Bharathnagar, Ramcfundra Puram, Medak District- 46.Shaik Mustafa Hussain Junaidi, S/o. Shaik Abdul Hus9q4 Junaidi, Aged about 59 years, Occ Engineer, R/o. H.No.10 -3 -29119/8, Hymayunagar, Hyderabad. -

47.Smt. Qudsia Bequm, Wo. Shaik Mustafa Hassan Junaidi, Aged 53 years, OCc Housewife,-R/o. H.No.10 -3 -2911918., Hymayunagar, Hyderabad. 48.Y. Nirmala, D/o. Y. Show Reddy, Aged about 42years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. S i rangipalem, Phirangipuram, Guntur District.

49.K. Hardhayal, S/o. Ranganayakulu, Aged.apo-$16I years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Madhava Nagar, BHEL; R.C. Puram, Medak District.

50.Sarvar Ahmad Khan, S/o. Late Mohd lsmail Khan, Aged about 52 years, Occ -- Ausiness, R/o. Fht No.202, B-Block, Skillestate, Humayunnagar, Hyderabad.

51. Mohd Zameruddin, S/o. Md. Zaheeruddin, Aged 51 years, Occ Business, - nyo.H.ruo.B - 3 - 228t128O144, Jawahamabar-, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. 52. Mohd Khader, S/o. Late Mohd Yakub, Aged abo-ut.49 ye3ry,.Occ. Business, -- Rl/o. H.No.8 - 1 - 39UPM1187, Paramount Hills colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad

53. Basharath Ahmed Khan, S/o. Basheer Afimed, Aged about 32 years, Occ Business, R/o. Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad.

54.Afzal Shaik, Slo. Shaik Mahmood, Aged'33 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad.

55. Smt. P. Jayamma, w/o. P. Balwanth Rao, Ageq about 54 years, Occ - - Emptovee,'R/o. H.ttlo.tO - 3 - 1921A, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad'

56. Settupalli Suresh, S/o. Koteshwar Rao, lgpg about 52 years, Occ Business. RJo. telecomnagar, Gachibowli, R.R. District.

57.Smt. V. Venkat Laxmi, Wo. VenkateshwaraRao, Aged abo-ut-47 years, Occ - Hor=e*ife, R/o. H.No. 4 - 180/8, Saibaba fficers Colony, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad.

58. Sarsama Nair, S/o. Balakrishna Nair, Aged about 58 ye.ap, Occ Business' - - nlo- plot No.4, ShanthiApartments, Sahtoshnagar, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad. ..ResPondents/APPel I ants

59.Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah, Aged about.70-years,.Occ Agriculture, -- Ry;. H tto.t - 3'4, GacnibowliVillage, Sefrlingampally Mandal' Ranga Reddy District.

60. Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah, H.No. 1 - 38/1, Gachibowli Village, District. Aoed about 60 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o S-erilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy

61. G: Sukkriah, S/o. Fl/o. H:No. 1'- 29' District. 28 53 Occ Mandal, Aoriculture. Ringa Reddy S/o. Khanamet Balaiah, Aged abotrt TE .1-58/1,Gach ibowli Village, . H.NO District. .Occ Maiiital, *Rts1; i,lf fl iiB?"Hil?,ft ilffi !::'.s3',1i"i:ffi:1'?'^ffifni Occ Housewife, , R.R. District. u"fi :n?"1T':*,%?;f ,r|x^ii}ft :s:81fi P"".}j,XlJfir"ft District. Ifi ixffi .Yr" "",i5,ff *" 3:3!8il*,?1%;t;.?#,fiTil1,13::s"'f,i'"'r',t*[?1,'f*o.,?L]f?[jltif*5j3r" District. uuff 'n?i'i'.[[5:3',s;ft ?il#1'b:Hfs,:ffi 'i'ii^ffi fi B,:fi :*T&:'5tf '"" District.

67.G. Fi/o.H.No.1 '-?t 3;3'lls$,?I,fP,E1."33}ili,l;"',"Tn,?iT'#9[t]HlBo,. *Ril'r9i3li1il1'#'3n,3;#liiiili j'.:1,f,l;J,L1?,1,"ffi ;?,,"f I'l'iff SEa, Diskict. :,f"lijpif uy8i8;$il"Jiillal'Ssl.f; [:'.fJ;ifi"?:iA?ffig'H&S" 'fi T,';3t?ixlB"'iir;?i,\lii,xl3:s.ff '*e:?#ir'^i3l"a,?''ii133'E$'31"" Distric{.

71.G. - 44, S/o. G #FJUt*fl f,i31",',1'','-.f#:l?",Xt3'li5l'5iirR/o'HNo'1 District. "fi :,[1Y1"&,%?;3#[,ii0ft #:8i'ii"$,ffi J,:ti,'g"f"f '{"x'J'JE;fi i' :i!':'["d.Y; 'nf#:ii:3s;fi6#,?U,ilS:".1iiru:3,":ff 'fi Distric{. "?8:,ifl "'fi

74.Joint Cotlector-1, Ranga Reddy District 75.Spl. Gr. Dy. Collector AND RDO' Rajendranagar Division Reddy, S/o. J. Narasimha Red 76.J. R/o. 1st Floor, Sai Krupa Four erabad 1t2022 rpet, Hyd E IA.NO. rlv. Aoed 69 vears, Occ Retired n?:oeit. H.u<i. z -2-25lPl7l1o1, rRTo rs IMPLEADED AS PER rir cRp. s632/2016) D. c.o., ...RESPONDENTS 29 7 petition under Section 151 of CPC praythS that in'the cir6gmstances stated in tne atidivtt filed in support of itre petition, ltre High Court- may-be^91e.134 i;;;peration ot ihe order dat;d 24.0e.2016 in Case No. F2l6066/2013 ;G;; on the file of the Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District ' Gounsel for the Petitioner No.l :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel forthe Petitioner No.2 : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Gounsel for the ResPondent Nos.7,10,17,1 SRI 1,42,45,49,48,52, 54, 55 H CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.5'6'8, 1 3,1 4,1 6,19,2 1,22,23,26,2.8,29'38,46,47,50 : SRI E MADAN MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents Nos.59'60'61 and 62 to 71 : SRI SAURABH Counset for the ResPondent No.76 : SRI B VENKAT RAMA RAO Petition Undqr section 91 of A.P (T'A) Tenancv and Agricultural -E{Y^l9t rsso agii;ved uy"trre orderdated 24.0'9.2016 passed in case No. F2l955/2018 ."it,"6r"" of the court of the Joint coflector-|, Ranga Reddy District. Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah' S/o. No. 1 Agricultu District. (Died per LRs P4 to PB) re R|/ o. H. late Manikonda Kondaiah' -67 I 1, Gachibowli' Seriling Aged 52 years, Occ ly Ranga Reddy Occ Redd H.No.1-56/ 1, Aoriculture R/o. 2. D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged.62-years' y-Oistrict. (DieO Gachibowli Viliage Serilingamaplly, Ranga 3. D. Shantamma, Wo. Late D' Gandaiah, aged 68 vrs Occ: Housewife' Fi/o' "NIs;-t'i;;'ip;fi;mmi tempte' Gachibowli' R'R' H.No. 1 -s7l1 7/e, naieev District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought on record as LR of-the deceased P 2 as per the L;ilil;r d;i ealqr i'r izozl in l.A. No'3 ot 2o2o)

4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years' Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chiranjeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 40 years' Occ: 6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 34 years' Occ: 7. M. Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, occ: Agriculture 8. M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years Agriculture Agriculture 30 All are fVo, H.No. 1-5716/1, Street No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli; Ranga Reddy District. gerl*Xf nl""$l?"to1lot'runntrSlu'ifJ^1io:Ti,&tt11""*?T33# of 2016') ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos'16 & 17 AND,

1. Smt.Usha Rani, Wo. Leander V-owe!"'$.ot Gabhibowli Village' " Sliliiilgiimpillv Mandal Ransa Reddv District' RespondenUAppellant

2. ffuRevenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4. Ar,rthorizred fficer, Land Reforms' Collectorate' R'R' District' 5. Station l-louse Officer, Rayadurga Police Station' R'R' District' 6. Gadda l3alaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about.70 years' "' Hft:H.t'6. T-id: 6iitrioowii Vittage' Seriiinsa mpallv Mandal Occ Ranga Distriot.

7. G. Shankar (Died Per LRs)' - ' fi1fi.?lr5itlSl?*,r"Ji,Si';6,T33;'',"e::.'J,''irffi3l'd,?a'"ffifrt'i&"" District.

9. G. Krishrna (Died Per Lrs)' - 'lO.G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 53 years' Occ ' "' H.Nrlli:Is]'6ailiuowti Villase, seritinsampallv Mandal Ransa ll,.KhanametShivaiah,S/o.KhanametBalaiahAgedaboutTSvears.occ Aoribuftr.rre nyo. H.No.r -6di SIit'iu"*iiVitta96' Serilingamfally Mandal Ringa lleddY District. R/o District.

12.Sved Krreem, S/o. Khaia Occ Agriculture' Ri/o Gachibowli Village' '-'Sfilirigfipiliy Mandal'Ranga Reddv District SiJritinti'imdlv Mandal Ranga Redd v District

13.Md.Ghrruse,S/o.lateMd.lsmaj]occAgriculture,Rl/o.GachibowliVillage' ' "' r4.Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. Ismail occ Agriculture, Fl/o. Gachibowli Mllage' ' -'Sllritii,g".da[y Mandal Ranga Reddv District 15.Md. Wazeer, S/ o. late Khasim Ali OccAgriculture' R/o' Gachibowli Village' ' -' 16.Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim {!i Oqc l9r!c.u!ture' Rl/o Gachibowli Village' ' "' SJriti,idimpitiy trlanoat Ransa Redd v District Siiriti,ig inpiliv trllano at Ranga Reddv District " $;',-lfid;,il;[v Minaat Ransa Reddv District

17.Mr.Bab,aiah,S/olateBalaLingaiahOc!Agriculture'Fi/oGachibowliVjllage' 31

18.Swamy, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ AgriCulture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilinlampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

19.Smt. Santamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Viltage, ,seriltngampatly Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

20.Gadda Yettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

21.Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.Madiga Pentaiah, S/o. late Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

23.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. B. Shankar Aged about 60 years, Occ Housewife R/o. H.No .1-44, Gachibovi Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 2:4.G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 41 years, OccAgricultureR/o. H.No.l 44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

25.G. Suresh, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 39 years, Occ Agricullure R/o. H.No.2.$il2tBl24, G achibowl i Village, S e ri li n g a mpa lly Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

26.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 37 years, Occ Agricqllu1e, R/o. H.No.l44, GachibowliVillage, Serilihgampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

27.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 35 years, Occ Agriculturg-R/o. H.No.l 44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

28.Smt..G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna, Aged about 45 years, Occ Houqe wife, R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

29.G. Sanjeeva, S/o. G. Krishna. Aged about 32 yqqrs, Occ Agriculture. Rl/o. H.No.1:44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 30.Smt. G. Saritha , Dlo. G. Krishna, Aged about 29 years, Occ Housewife. R/o. H.No.144, GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally tvlandal, Ranga Reddy District. 31 . G. Jaipat, S/ o. G. Krishna Aged about 27 years, Occ fg_riculture Rl/o. H.No .1 -44,'Gdchibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.Dist.

32.G. Naveeh, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years, Occ Agrry;qlture R/o. H.No.144, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R-R.Dist. 33.G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 23 years, Occ Agqcgllurq Rl/o.H.No.1 -44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist. 34.ir//s. Kastopa Corporation, Rep. Qy its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar R/o. 5-8-57, fop ffor, Kamat Hotel, Slation Road, Nampally, Hyderabad.

35.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. ... Respo ndents/Responde nts 32 OF I PetitionunderSectionlslofCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in tne affidavit: filed in .r"r""o G ine hfe of tne Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' tuY{ qal-|g.Pleased -t!r9-Hig!t of tire order dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2l955/2016 on "rppott of the petition, "rceration Counset for thre Petitioner No'l :SRI D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for thre Petitioner No'2 : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos'24 to 33 : SRI SAURABH RAJ Counsel for tlrre Respondent No.34 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY N 7n Petition Under section 91 of A'P (T'A) Tenancy and Agricultural -f:$:^ld' f SSO agg;;ve,i OV ttt" Order dated 24'Og'2016 Passed in Case No'F2119412O14 ""it "-i,fZ' Between: of tt e Court of the Joint Collector-l, Ranga Reddy District.

1. Manikorrda Yadaiah' S/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah Rlo' H'No' 1-6711' ' 6.;;liiib;;li, s;rilils;inp;lti ninga Reoav District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) -' Virr"gil S",iiingampallv Ranga Reddv District (Died) 2.D.Gandiriah'S/o.LateDarapalliBalgia|rR/o.H.No.1-56/.l,Gachibowli 3. D. Sharrtamma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs' Occ: Hous.ewife' R/o' " F.r\rt.].'siiiriB, #E;NJgai, Nei|. pbcHamma Temple, Gachibowli, R.R. District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought on record as ![-ol the deceased P 2 as per the ti'rt oilGr oited 2ll11f2o21in l.A.No'3 of 2020)

4. M. Sugurna, Wio. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years' Oce: Housewife 5. M. Chiranieevi' S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 40 years' Occ: Agricultttre Agriculture

6.M.MaheshKumar,S/o.LateManikondaYadaiah,Aged34years,occ: 7. M. Srik:rnth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, occ: Agriculture 8. M. Prav;rllika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 22 years All are lVo. H.No. 1-5716/1, Street No.3' Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga ReddY t)istrict. ) (Petitio,rers No. 4 to 8 are brought 91- lecord as LRs of the dece-ased ' deiit-i;;i;'N".r'i.'pii,'6.o., oi,-laloz.2025 vide lA'No' 1/2025 in cRP'No' 5634 of 2016.) AND ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos'5 & 6 33 ,,: , l, ] ,,. Venkat Aged 65 years, Occ: Doctor'R/o.

1. KManmohan H.No.2-4-925, Reddy, S/o. K. Nimboli Adda tGchiguda, 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4. Authorized fficer, Land Reforms, Collectorate, R.R. Distric{. 5. Station House fficer, Rayadurga Police Station, R.R. District, 6. Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-38, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal RangaReddy District.

7. G. Shankar (Died per LRs), - 8. Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-38/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Flianga Reddy District.

9. G. tffshna (Died per Lrs), - 10.€. Sukkalah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 53 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. l'-1.No.1-29, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy ' District. l l.Khanamet Shirraiah , S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged about 78 years, Occ R/o. H.No.1-58/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Rarga Reddy District.

12. lGr6em, S/o. U.ill Khaja Occ Agriculture, Fl/o. Gachibowli Village, ndal Ranga Reddy District.

13.Md. Mouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Mllage, Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 't4.Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District

15.lvH. Wazecr, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, Ri,/o. Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampalty Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

16.Ahmed Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim All Occ Sedlingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Dis Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Mllage, trict.

17.Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Serilingampally Mandal Ra Lingaiah OccAgriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Mllage, nga Reddy District.

18. S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Mandal Ranga Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Reddy District.

19.Srnt. Sadamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

20.@dda Yeltaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

21.Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.G Madiga Fentaiah, S/o. late Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 34 ,rH[1iu3:L?1l3H[il"Yfvft ,33,15trffi*#'ir',l,g?]3'ufi;"?Ts"d1,"r** District. ,of :.Blfl?:#:,.,ffi ?lii:T*#ffi*x1nrffi l'Saffinnt?'Hf#3a*i",

25. G.Surer;h, S/o. G. Shankar 4.qe.9 abo{ 39.,y998'-Qcc Agriculture R/o' H. No. 2-62 nB tii, #;hi#fiivil6ge Seritihgint'pally M5ndal Ransa Reddv District. 'u8N'Jl1:ffT"Ti3i?'Pvfi l8::3t*fl fis"ffi$,f il,xfi e5'3""'fn]'trJlt;By'.h 27.G.Prak:rsh, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 y..e?F' Qcg4gricu[urq f/o -' il.Nd]-;ia,'c;;hi6*iivin"se,-s-Jriiingimpatty Mahdal Rahsa Reddv District' 'uR[lHcN;:i-X"4:'3'#/iog,,$ii,l33,t%?1ff:H'#?ift District. ffi agt jl3:'ft #1", H.No.1-.++, c#Xio6*iiVlirrgd,'BLritingampati, trlairdal Ransa Reddv District.

29.G.Sanjeeva, S/o. G- Krishna Aged about 32.yegp' Occ AOricuilurg.R/o , BT,';?-P-itx?iPJ3;fr[,'j;Ti3$ffr3H#jr'rynu{3il';'R??l3H'"%1',1"#?'r", 31.G. Jaiperl, S/o. G. KrishnaAged about 27 years,occ Aoriculture R/o' H'No' 1 - 4 4, G a cn i oorit i tii i;#, 5 ;-ti li d;;p;lli t tario'ai nansi Reo o v D ist ri ct 3z.G.Nav€,en, S/o. G. Kriqh.!.a Agei qpout 25 years' Occ Aqriculture R/o' H.No.1-++, oa"cni-uowli Viri"ri"] d"riiilg;m-p6fr:Mhndat Rlnga Reddv District'

33.G. Prav,3en, S/o. G- Krishna Aggd about 23 y.eqry' O9gfgricultlre.R/o' H.No.1_+q, crJni6"'irri'vili"g":$dtinbtmpa-l[ Mdndal R-nsa Reddy District.

34. M/s. Kastopa corporation,. F9P.. by its M.D. S.ri Anil Kumar R Kamdar R/o' s_8-57, rop rri[rlkfr;t t$t[t, blation Road, Nampally, Hyderabad

35. Joint Collector-1 , Ranga Reddy District ...ResPondents/ResPondents 2 201 Petition under Section 151 of cPc praying that in the circumstances stated -the- Hig! coy.( T?y.1" pleased in the affidavrt rirlJ in- support of the petition, suspend the c,peration of the order dated 24.09'2016 in Case No' F2l1941 2O14 on the file of the ,Joint collector-1, Ranga Reddy District counsel for trhe Petitioners : sRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos.24 to 33 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for the Respondent No'34 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY I 35 NO:5635 OF 2016 Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 aggrierred by lhe Ordqr dated 24.09.2016 Passed in Case No. F2l5409/2013 on the filb of the Court of the Joint Collector-i, Ranga Reddy District Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. Late M. Kondaiah r/o. H.No. 1{7/1, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District. (Died per LRs P.4 to 8) 2. D.Gandaiah, S/o. Late D.Babaiah ilo. H.No. 1-56i/1, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Ranga Reddy District. (Died)

3. D. Shantamma Wo Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs., Occ: House Wife, R/o H.No.1-57l17lB, Rajeev Nagar, Near Pochamma Temple, Gachibowli, Rangareddy District. (Petitioner 3 is brought on record as LR of the deceased P2 as per C.O., dt.24.11.2021 in lA.Nb.3 0t 2020\

4. M. Suguna Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs., Occ: House Wife 5. M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs., Occ: Agriculture 6. M. Mahesh Kumar S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 34 yrs., Occ: Agriculture

7. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs., Occ: Agriculture 8. M Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 22 yrs., (Petitioners No.4 to 8 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Petitioner No.l i.e. Manikonda Yadaiah as per CoJrt Order dated 06j0.2025, vide l.A.No.1 of 2O25 made in CRP.No.5635 of 2016) Petitioners/Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 AND

1. T.VANAJA, Wo. T.Pradeep Kumarm , Occ: Household 2. T.Lathangi, Wo. T.Vidya Bhushan, Occ: Household 3. Smt.B.Sangeetha, Wo. Late B.Ramesh, Occ: Household 4. Smt. T.Swama, Wo. T.Virupaksha, Occ: Household 5. Smt.T.Padma, Wo. T.Vijaya Kumar, Occ: Household 6. Smt. V.Shankuntala, W/o. Muralidhar Rao, Occ: Household 7. A.Sarathchandra, S/o. A.Aniaiah, Occ: business, Respondents No. 1 to 7 are Rl/o. H.No. 11-1-112, Bapunagar, Saroornagar, Hyderabad.

8. Laxmidas Jhaveri, S/o. Gopaldas Jahaveri Rl/o. H.No. 4-1-363, Reddy Hostel Comples, Abids, Hyderabad.

9. M.Chandrasekhar Rao, S/o. Late M.Narsing Rao Fl/o. H.No. 9-23' Laxminagar Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad. 1O.Smt. M.Srilatha, Wo.M.Chandrasekhar Rao Rl/o. H.No. 9-23, Laxminagar Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad. 36 . . . Respondents/APPellants ll.GaddaElalaiah,S/o.G.MaisaiahF/o..H.No.1.38,GachibowliVillage' ' ''5;fii;s;ilHii rvr'a-noat nansa Reddv District' - 12.Gadda Chandraiah, S/o' G'Miisaiatr R/o' H"No' 1-3 ',.'5;;il't;ffi;llv Mlhoai Ranga Reddv District' i8/1' GachibowliVillage'

13.G.Sukkatiah,S/o.G'MaisjriahFyI'H'No'1-zq'GachibowliVillage' ' "' E;iiiiiZiffi'r-l li, M;no ii na ns a Red d v D istrict' l4.KhanametShivaiah,S/o.KhanamgtBalaiah.R/o,F.No.1-5811,Gachibowli ' -' ut6;;; l5;ritftffiiarrv wrdooal Rbnsa Reddy District. l5.Smt.G.Laxmamma,Wo'B'ShalkarF/otHtN'o'144'GachibowliVillage' '"'$;iii;A;ffip"lv Ghoii Ransa Reddv District'

16.G.Darshran,S/o.G.ShankarRi/o'H'No'1'44'GachibowliVillage' ' "' 5#ii;;,,il'piriv rvtino it Ranga Reddv Distriet' 1 7. G.Sures h, S/o. G.Shankar R/o. F.No. 2.62t2t8t24' Gachibowli Village' "' 5;;ii;;;;,hp;-lli Minoii Ransa Reddv District' lS.G.ShivaKumar,Q/o'9,9!ankarRi/o'H'No'1'-44'GachibowliVillage' ' "' 5#ftfrr'* p JrU' rtlta no it Ranga Reddv District' 19.G.Prakersh,S/o.G.ShankarR/o-H'No'1'44'GachibowliVillage' ' "' 5.riiiili,ilb;ilv' M;noit nanga Reddv District' 20.Smt.G.Susheela,W/9'.Q'KrishnaR/o'H'No'1-44'GachibowliVillage' '"' sli iiii n-g',fi p ;it t\ia nd al Ransa Reddv District' 21.G.Sanj€}eva,S/o.G.Kris[naFUo.H.trlo.l.44,GachibowliVillage' Seriling;ampaf fV tvtinOal Ranga Reddy District'

22.G.Sarittra,D/o.G.KrishnaRl/o.H.No.l.44,GachibowliVillage' Serilingampalty UfanOal Ranga Reddy District'

23.G.Jaipal, S/o. G.Krlshryr.R/9.H.No. 1-44,GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally -" Ml-nO-ai Ranga ReddY District'

24.G.Naveen,S/o.G.KrishnaR/o.H.No.1-44,GachibowliVillage' Serili ng ampirry ttninoal Ranga Reddy District'

25.G.Pravt:en,S/o.G.KrishnaFl/o.H.No.l.44,GachibowliVillage' Seriling ampif f V fU" nOil Ranga Reddy District' , .. !,.:, f,35."-j-+f-:Iii!=;:Iaj:i:j :jfil 37

26.Joint Collector-1 , Ranga Reddy District

27. Spl.Gr.Dy.Collector & RDO, Raiendranagar Division ...ResPondents/ResPondents NO: 2 OF 201 P. NO:7308 16 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2l5409/ 2013 on the file of the Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. D JAGAN MOHAN REODY Counsel for the.Respondent Nos.ll to 25 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA CIVIL REVISION PETtTroN NO: 5665 OF 2016 Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 aggrieved by the Order dated 24.09.2016 Passed in Case No.F2l187l2O14 on the file of the Court of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District' \ Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah R/o. H.No. 1-6711' Gachibowli, Serilingampally Ranga Reddy District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) 2. D.Gandaiah, S/o. Late Darapalli Babaiah R/o. H.No. 1-56/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Ranga Reddy District (Died)

3. D. Shantamma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No. 1-57117l8, Rajeev Nagar, Near Pochamma Temple, Gachibowli, R.R. District. {Petitioner No.3 is brouoht on reeord as LR of the deceased P 2 as per the iou rt order dat ed 241 1 1 i2021 in l.A. No. 3 of 2o2ol

4. M. Suguna, W/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years, Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chiranjeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: Agriculture

6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture I

7. M. Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years' Occ: Agriculture

8. M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years All are Ryo. H.No. 1-5716/1, Street No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District. (Petitioners No.4 to 8 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Fetitioner No.1 as per C.O., dt:. 18.02.2025 vide lA.No. 112025 in cRP. 5665 of 2016.) ...Petitioner/Respondent Nos.16 & 17 ) 38 ENI'] 1. 86 Ri/o.

2. Chava China H.No.1-'l-1lA, Opp ChaitanYa Wo. years Rrb. H.

3. Smt. Chava Aged about 82 Hyderabad. 4. Chava Sirinivas, S/o. Chava Hanumantha Fg np^eO about 36 years Fl/o' Plot - ffi3b1:-H;a-tloso.tuoitee Hills' Hvderabad - e6' SriChava Qhina Veerabhadraiah .1-7-1lA,opp Chaitanya School Chaitanyapuri

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendrcrnagar Division . Dy. Collector &-Tahsildar, Seritingampally Mandal 6 ...Respondents/APPellants Authori2ed Officer, Land Reforms, Collectorate' R'R' District' 7 8. Station l-louse Omcer, Rayadurga Police Station' R R District' 9. Gadda llalaiah, F/o. H.l{o.1-38, District. S/o. Gadda.Maisaiah Gachibowli Viltage, , Occ Ag riculture I Ranga Reddy

10. G. Shankar (Died Per LRs)' 1 1 . Gadda H.No.1-38/1, District. about 60 vears, Occ Agriculture R/o. ampally M'andal Ranga ReddY

12. G. Kristrna (Died Per Lrs)' - 13. G. Sukt:aiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah.Aged about 53 years, occ Agriculture R/o' '" H.N;Ii9:'6ai[ioo*ri viillgl-, seriiin"gampafly Mandal Ranga Reddv District. l4KhananletShivaiah,s/o.KhanametBalaiahAged^about78years.occ.. '- iiffifiii;;;-C6.'H.ilo.i:56iilGc*rioowti villasl, serilinsampallv tVlandal Ringa lReddY District. ,r3::f "tlffi lf{r?sf#ili3ff.itJstJL','"'Rr/oGachibowrivirrase'

16.Md. Ghcuse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture,. Fi/o. Gachibowli, Village, SerilingamPallY Mandal'Ranga Reddy District. S.tlf'ngimpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 17 rvtrt Yousuf. S/o. late Md. lsmait occ Agriculture, Ryo. Gachibowli village, ' 1 8. Md. Warzeer, S/o, late Khasim {!i Qqg {griculture'R/o Gachibowli Village' '" 19.Md. Werzeer, S/o. late Khasim {!i Occ {grlqulture' Rl/o Gachibowli Village' '" S"iiriigr-mpitty Mandat Ranga Reddy District' S"iiriigu-.pitly Mandal Ranga Reddv District

20.Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bata SerilingamPallY Mandal Ranga h re, Rlio. Gachibowli Village, 39 2't.Swamv, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Serilinbampally Mandal Ranga Reddy 22.Smt. Santamma, Wo. Late. Balaiah Occ Serllingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Occ , FUo. Gachibowli Mllage, FUo. Gachibowli Mllage,

23.Gadda Yettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah O-oc.{gplllttlle, R/o' Gachibowli -- Miiage, Serilingimpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 24.Gadda Narsirnha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ Village, SerilingamPallY Mandal Ranga Reddy , R/o. Gachibowli

25. Madioa Pentaiah. S/o. late Veeraiah occ Agriculture, Fl/o. Gachibowli Village, Seriliigampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

26.Smt. G R/o, H. District Occ Housewife Reddy

27.G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village' about 41 istrict. District. "fi ,u'"lf 3!a?6",r33:3il'[1'#"tff "18t3fi 'nfi ,,'ji'i[3"Ti3',i;'f vfi !6il3tifl"?"?,i3,lf,f LXfi 85'.ffi#HJl'Hf "" ,ffi 3H'r9'ff $3x8ll'H5,Y""i.*r, District. 3O.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar H.No.'t -44, Gachibowli Village' about 35 31 . Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna Aged- about '15 "' Fio. ff .f'fof -a+. C'acnlOowti Village, Sirilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy years' Occ House wife District.

32.G. Sanieeva, H.No.1-44, G 32 strict. * 33.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29 !'ears, Occ Housewife Fl/o' F.i,lb.i-44; oJit iuorrti. village, s;rilingampally-Mandal Ranga Reddv District.

34.G. Jaipal, S/o. G Krishna Aqed about 27 Years,, lage, SerilingamPallY Mandal Ranga 44, Gachibowli vit G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years' Occ. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal 35 Occ 36 G H Praveen, S/O No.1-44, Gach Rl/o. H.No.'1- District. R./o. Reddy District Rlo. Reddy District. 37-M/s.KastooaCorporation,Rep.byitsM.D..SriAnilKumarRKamdarRl/o. ""65-5r, r;;?roorlkarit uotel, Siation Road, Nampallv, Hvderabad' 38.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District .Respondents/ResPondents 40 OF 1 Petition under section i5t of cpc prayihg that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,-the.HighCourtmaybe.pleased th" ;r"."tion of thl order dated 24.09.2016 in case No. F2118712o14 on il;il ttle nt" ot ttt" Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' Counsel for the Peti(ioner No.{ :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the PetitiONET NO.2 : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l, 2 & 4: SRI V VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9, 11,13,20,22,27 TO 36 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for the Respondent No.37 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY C LR 6 . petition under sec-tion 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural !14:-1d' rbso ,gg;Lr.,iuv it. order dated 24'ob'2016 Passed in Case No F2l954/2016 .;1ili6 of the iourt of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddv District' Between:

1. Manikorrda Yadaiah' S/o. Late [email protected] R/o HNo l-6711' ' H#ib;;ti, sJrinrigainplfli Ranga Reddy District (Died per LRs P4 to PB) ' Vtn-ri,il S"iiiinglripiiii nansa Reddv District ( Died ) 2.D.Gandraiah,S/o.LateDarapalliBabaiah!lo.HNo1.56/,1'Gachibowli - 3.D.Sharrtamma,Wo.LateD.Gandaiah,aged68yrs'Occ:Housewife'R/o' H r\ri.]:'iiii?/B,-R;jeei\iriai tleiipbcfiamma ienrple, Gachibowli, R'R' District. (Petitiorer No.3 is brought on record as LR.of-the deceased P 2 as per the i"i,'rt oi Gr ditea 24l11ho21 in l.A.No.3 of 2o20)

4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years' Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chi'?njeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 40 years' Occ: Agricultttre

6.M.MaheshKumar,S/o.LateManikondaYadaiah.Aged34years,occ: 7. M. Srikanth, s/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, occ: Agriculture Agriculture B. M. Prav,allika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years All are lVo. H.No. 1-5716/1, Street No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy t)istrict. (Petitiorlers No.4 to 8 are brought-91-re99rq.as LRs of the deceased petition()r No.1 as pe, Ci.d, at: f adi.ZOZS vide lA No. 112025 in CRP. 5666 of 2016 ) 4t ...PetitionerslRespondents Nos.l 6 & 1 7 AND 1 P Sandhya Rani, Wo Sekar. V R/o GachibowliVillage Serilingampally Mandal Rarga Reddy District. ...RespondenUAppellant

2. The Revenue DivisionalOfficec Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4. Authorized Officer, Land Reforms, Collectorate, R.R. District. 5. Station House Officer, Rayadurga Police Station, R-R- District, 6. Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1 -3S; Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

7. G. Shankar (Died per LRs), - I Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture R/o H.No. 1 -38/1, Gachibowli Mllage, Se-rilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

9. G. Krishna (Died per Lrs), - 10.G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 53 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-29, GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1 1. Khanamet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged about 78 years, Occ Aqriculture Fl/o. H.No .1 -581 1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Manda I Ringa Reddy District.

12.Syed Kareem, S/o. Khaja Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Sbrilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

13. Md. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

14. Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

15. Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Md. lsmail, Occ Agriculture, Ri/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

16. Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

17. Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

18.Swamy, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah_OcgAgllcy[ture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilinlampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1g.Smt. Santamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingarrpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

20.Gadda Yetaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 42 21 . Gaddalrlarsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ_Agqculture, R/o- Gachibowli - Vittige, Serilingampally Mandal'Ranga Reddy District' 22.Madtoa Pentaiah, S/o. late Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gaehibowli"Village, S e ri li6gr m pa I ly' M a nd a I Ra nga R.ed dy D!-strict

23.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. B. Sharlkar Aged about 6Q yea-rs.,-Occ Ho-usewife --' Ry;;' H. ito. t -++, CainiOowti Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

24.G. Darshan, s/o. G. Shankar Aged about 41 .ye3p, occ:\oricullurg.R/o. - H,tto.t-++, GacnibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 25.G. Suresh, S/o. G. ShankarAged abo4 39-.years, O.9c-{Oriqultge R/o. - - ff . No Z: AAAAT Zq, GachibowliVillage, Serilinga mpal ly Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

26.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 3-7 yeqrq,-Occ Agriculture R/o. --'H.tto.t-44, GachibowliVillage, Serili-ngampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 27.G. Prakiash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 yreqqs, OccAgricu[urg $/o. - ff.f.to.t-44,'Gachibowli Village,Eerilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy' District. 28.Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna Aged about 45 y99rs, Oc-c House wife -- nyo. H.l.lo:1-44, GachibowliVillage, S-erilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

29.G. Sanieeva, S/o. G. Krlqlna Aged..about 32.ye-ars, 9q"3gti"ui!ur9.R/o. -- t+.5o1'-,+4, GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 30.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29 years, Occ Horlsewife R/o. -- H.G.1-,++, Oa"hibowliVillage, Sefrlingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 31.G. Jaiperl, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 27 years, Occ Agtcultutr Ryg. H'No.l- - 44, GichiOowliVillage, Seriilngampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 32.G. Naveen, Slo. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years, Occ.Agriculture R/o. -- tf .f...to.i-,d4,'GachibowliVillage, Scrilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

33. G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 23 years, O.c9 fOriculture, R/o. -- ff .f.to,t-,l4, GachibowliVillage, Scrilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

34. M/s. Ka:;topa Corporation, Rep.. QV ill M.D. SriAnil Kumar R Kamdar R/o. - S-$-SZ,'l-op Floor, Kamat Hotdl, Station Road, Nampally, Hyderabad

35.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District ... Res po n dents/Res ponde nts \ :., .. - ::-. :- :::i.:r:g*;'. tli;iria: ' .i:- :r,l ; rr;:::.:jiEq:if i::rff :-l€,l':k.: :; f:ii.',::::, li:. j:t,i. :,i, 43 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in SUpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the opfiftion 6T"tfie' Ofder dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2t95412016 on the file of the Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioners :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l , inl AVANCHA H CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.27 to 36 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for the Respondent No.34 , nri. E ANISHA REDDY Petition Under sec'tion 91 oJ A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 aggrieved bythe Orderdated 24.09.2016 Passed in Case No.F2l606812013 on the file of the Court of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District. Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah R/o. H.No. 1-6711, Gachibowli, Serilingahpally Ranga Reddy District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) 2. D.Gandaiah, s/o. Late Darapaiti Babaiah R/o. H.No1-56/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Ranga Reddy District (Died)

3. D. Shantamma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No. 1-5711718,, Rajeev Nagar, Near Pochamma Temple, Gachibowli, R.R. District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought gn record as LR of the deceased P 2 iourt order dated 13n1f2024 in l.A.No.3 of 2O2O in CRP.no 5667 of 2016) 4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years, Occ. Housewife 5. M. Chiranjeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: per the -1s^ Agriculture

6. M, Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture T. M. Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, Occ: Agriculture 8 M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years All are R/o. H.No. 1-571611, Street''No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District. (Petitioners No. 4 to 8 qre brought on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner No.1 i.e.,'"Manikonda yadaiah" as per C.O., dt: 06-10-2025 vide lA.No. 1 of 2O2O in CRP. 5567 of 2016.) ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.1 2 & 1 3 AND 44

1. cH. Sarttdamba, Wo. CH. Shiva H.No.8-}976/18' Shalivahana Nagar 67 Occ: Housewife R/o. Hyderabad Housewife H.No.8.1|-231l28/A, Srikrishna Nagar

2. K. Pramr;ela Devi, Wo. S. Venkateshwar Rao .E:,fft,ti"dr?,i,::rff :lll$"1.,Ai?1fi iJi,XBS*HodsehoreRi/o' o g.p#illl Fs?,-.J:c, ?fl1,H.1$:3"?"t%i{::,?r,i,i'ilfffi #" H No' 1' u'Ur,?"t-?li,Tffi ll",i,:i:.tTi:lT:3$ii$'..T"t9il??iaPffo""*H**o uFi#f;,31?rH'ft"5ai[i?3i.1$:,!:1iflffi JF"1?agccHousewireR/o'H:No' 7- M. Paoalal, S/ o. Raja Lingam,-aged 74 years' Occ Household R/o' F'l' No' B'- " ii6,-M5at'ur"nagar, HYderabad' S.G.v.Ramavatharam,S/o.SambaMurthiaged.S3years.occBusinessR/o. H.No.8-:3-8eB/3a, proilii.io),'iliiiidiiirJricv Nag'ariunl Nasar' Hydembad. ,fi ,h"1i,i$3[a[3.P,Y;ffif f.:i'[38x}iSfr,ilJffi ',3ff"1''iruB#: loEHJalltT,Y&",HJiiIi3i:a#*it:',,"&'^iJ,fi?ft 1 1.V. Venkateswarlu, s/o. Krishna Murthv aged 53.years' occ Business R/o' "'tr#sl'ffi#3a prot il J. iijz Iili ii;;idh;t Nigaddna Nasar' Hvderabad' H.No.8-3-8e8/3+, "w'ir-r H. N o. 1 0_5 _ 1 4/ 1, e e s io e'dt"oi

12.M.K. Java Surya, S/o. Parta Saradhi aged 53- years' Occ Business FUo' siitat, . Masab Tank, HSerabad, 13.Vemuri Viiaya Sri, W/o Krishna Murthv aged 52 years' Occ Housewife R/o' ' "' ti-I,i;.bl i rfr+, st. No a. Habsisuda Secunderabad' ,ofi jE,i'il1l[",9"'r"fi " :nB:ti3,t".1!6lll";,[3 1 5.G. Srinivas ReddY' S/o. Ganga u No.202, AditYa Excl usive. Vetenary X;11 1,1;1 8fu?ir,f *li T.'."*fr tifl io'#8fa 7.R.M.C.'y'. Prasad Rao, S/o R. Venkateshwara Rao . Plot No.27. Hill Ridge Villas, 't58 ' 1 Business, RIo Hyderabad. 3ilg,JfiB'.?tr3f "'l]::"#id 44 vears, Occ Business R/o.. Plot Shaikpet, HYderabad. Ocr Business R/o. Plot 57 'uR":ff ;lft 8xtd,Et,;?i1,3;i),.%".1x:i31fi Sgff J"?8,?s"B$:"* 'n?a-r161il##":'il31?:34Yft 3l,1no"$,?|.'n??El,3.T#"?l,x#[i'ffi;i![:ai 20. Mitta Ulanoj, S/o. Mitta Jagan Mohan.aged 48 years' Occ Business R/o' H'No' '" 6:i0,' 6;i;ii'"ii ro*ers B-eg umpet, Hvderabad' 45

21. N. Srinivasa Chakravarthi, S/o. Late N. Krishna Murthy aged 49 years, Occ Business R/o. H.No.7-F12, Siris Srinllayam Ganesh Nagar, Chintal, Hyderabad.

22.J. Naveen Kumar, S/o. J. Ramesh ag@ 40 years,.Occ Business R/o. H.No.7- 7 5l A, Chaitanyapuri, H$erabed.

23.J.Praveen Kumar, S/o. J. Ramesh aged 38 years, Occ Business R/o H.No.7- 7 5l A, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad. Z4.C.Mswanatha Reddy, S/o. Sudhakar Reddy aged 36 years, .Occ Business R/o. Vedunr Village Old Post. Chapadu Mandal Cuddapah District.

25.V. UsharaniGande, Wo. Srinivas Gande aged 38 years, Gee Pvt. Service R/o. H.No. 3-6-108, Flat No.202Palae Arcade Apartments, Himayatnagar Hyderabad.

26. M. Raieswari, Wo. M. Venkiata Rami Reddy aged 39 years, Ogc Housewife Rl/o. Plot No.11; Phase-|, FCI Colony Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. 27

28.Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1 -38, Gachibowli Mllage Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

29.Gadda Sankar, S/o. Maisaiah Occ Agriculture R/o. H. No.1-38/ 1, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

30.Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah Aged about 60 years, Oce Agriculture R/o. H.No. 1 -381 1, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 31 . Gadda Krishna, S/o. Maisaiah, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. H.No.1-38/ 1 , Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

32. G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. H.No.1-29, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Manclal, Ranga Reddy District.

33. Khanamet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged about 78 years, Occ Agriculture Fl/o. H. No. 1 -5811, Gachibowli Village Seri li ng a mpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

34.Syed.Kareem, S/o. Khaja Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

35. Md. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

36. Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, RJo Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

37.Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

38. Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .\."...r:t.::!:t*ai..::.--.- '. ,'l.:r i_.:':i . :r.:=riji:::-,i?1:ij.il

39. &. S/o. 46 , FUo. Gac*ribowli Mllage Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachtbowli Village Reddy District. o''3[]li,"tn1llluill,'#13"'ffi ,'.?'5'ftio?!,"$3,i],?t!turew'o . Gactribowli Village o''$ft :33i!:Ifi l*;l"i'f f, 43 .Gadda lrlarsimha' S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ Mllage iierilingamPally Mandal , Ranga ReddY ''"'"iyi'd:iT.?r.t9B::[ffi *ys$,'P"eff l:1"i1','is,rF,H:'fl 3l3"&$fi !,:',**' B. Shankar Aged about Village Serilingampally

45.S mt. G. Laxmam ma, W/o. .1-44 Gachibowli R/o. H.t.lo District. . R/o. Gachibowli ' R/o. Gachibowli R/o. Gachibowli Mllage occ Housewife Reddy *' 46. G. Dars h an,^s/9 .9 s,l' n t'a' As ed about 4 1..vqe*' HlNr":i: a;, biiniuowtl Villase Serilinsampallv Mant G. Sure,sh, S/o. Ci. 11.No.2-621218,124. District.

47. 3 d?f;}on!T[Ho7&.",". R/o. Ranga ReddY about 37 Years, mpally Mandali Occ Flanga R/o. Distric zt8.G . Shiva Kumar' S/o. G. Shankar Aged H .No.'l-44, Gach ibowli Village Serilinga 49 .G. Prat:ash, S/o. G. Shankar H.No.1 -44. Gach ibowli Villag Aged e Seril Fl/o. Reddy District. Occ House wife Fl/ Ranga ReddY uoSs.*o,;?-1T"3:1,H'"1f District. "liffi:Tffi 3"?:8liif irl?1Ei 51 . G. Sanieeva. S/o.. G Knsh n a Ased about s?.veeo' fliffi!'fi[f;affi i.tri"t. "'' il.r.rliii-a+. Gachibowli Vrllage Serilingampally Mant Occ Houserarife R/o. 52.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o G Gach ib,owli Village Seri . Krrshna Aged about lingam.pallY Mandal' 29 Ranga R/o. H.llo.1- District. 27 years Mandal,

53.G. Ja 44,G iF'al, achi bowli Village Serilinga S/o. G. Krishna Aged about mpally , Occ Ranga 54.G. Naveen, S/o. G Kristrna Aged about 25 years' Occ -':a+ 6r"ri,obwli Vittage Serilin{ampally Mandal' Ranga 55.G. praveen,_s/o. p Krishna Aqed about 23 ve41s. ?tr Agl8H',H5.ffoo,.,n",. ""' H:Nd: fi ,'ciirrruowti Village 56.Spl. G'. Dv.. Collector &, RDO Raiendranagar Division urRil)l"p,t3i,.lf ![S,,i$;J,,U:Sy#X,,f fl*.*S'l&H'occHousewire 58.V. Raiendra Prasad, S/o Satyanarayana Aged 53 years' Occ Business Fl/o' ""' i i 9,-" Ri, Sanathnagar. Hyderabad' -Serilingampally Mant District. R/o. H.No. I 47

59.V. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. V.D. Rama Reddy Aged about 50 years, Occ Business R/o. 8-3-315/3A, Maruthi Nagar, Yousufgucla, Hyderabad.

60.K. Radha Krishna Murthy, S/o. K.N. SastryAged about 70 years, Occ Rtd. Employee R/o. Anand Nagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hydeqbad

61.Mr. B. Jhansi Lakshmi, S/o. Vasu Deva Rao Aged about 55 years, Occ Employee R/o. Plot No.1'75, Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli Ranga Reddy District. 1

62.Diamond Hills Wetfare Association, Rep. by its Secretary Sri P. Narayana Reddy S/o. late P.V. Subba Reddy

63.M/s. Kastopa Corporation, Rep. by its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R lGmdar R/o. 5- 8-57, Top Floor, Kamat Hotel, Station Road, Nampally, Hyderabad.

64.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. Respondents/Respondents l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(CRPMP. NO: 7345 OF 20161 Petition uqper Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2l606812013 on the file of the Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3, 4,6,12 & 59 : SRI A BHARATH KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.15,17,19,33 to 43 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for the Respondent No.63 : SRI E ANISHA AREDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5668 OF 2016 Petition Under section 9'l of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 aggrieved by the Order dated 24.09.2016 Passed in Case No. F2l19512014 on the file of the Court of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District. Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah Aged 52 yearc, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-6711, Gachibowli, Serilingamaplly Ranga Reddy District. ( Died as per LRs P4 to P 8)

2. D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged 62 yeas, Occ: Agriculture (Died R/o. H.No.1-56/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingamaplly, Ranga Reddy District.

3. D. Shantamma, W/o. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 1-5711718, Rajeev Nagar, Near Pochamma Temple, Gachibowli, R.R. District. q: :.r, :r'.::il r:ji.r, r': .1 : 48 on recrrd as. LR of the deceased P2 as per Co dt of 20) No.3 is brought tA.NO.3 24111-21 in

4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah; Aged 54 years' Occ: Housewife S.M.Chiranjeevi,S/o.LateManikondaYadaiah'Aged4o.years'Ooc: Agricufture Agriculture

6.M.MaheshKumar,S/o-LateManikondaYadaiah'Aged34years'Occ: 7. M. Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, occ: Agriculture 8. M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years 9. Alt are fvo. H.No. 1-57t6t1, Street No. 3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli' Ranga Reddy District. No.4toSare .1 as per C.O., dt: 1B-02 .2025 ht on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner vide lA.No. 1 I 2025 in CRP. 5668/2fi 6.) rslRespondents Nos.16 & 't7 D ,| . Smt. M. Usha Rani, W/o. M. Siva Prasa{, Aged J2 years' Software il;#:;il;;. ii"ii6. 6-a-i246loos' nai BhaVan Larie Raj Bhavan Road' Hyderabad. -Qcc:

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Ralendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar Serilingampally Mbndal' 4. Authoriz'ed Officer, Land Reforms, Collectorate, R'R' Oistrict' 5. Station House Officer, Rayadurga Police Station' R'R' District: 6. Gadda llalaiah, S/o. Gadda Mai sala R/o. H.l,lo.1-38, Gachibowli Village, (

7. G. Sharrkar (Died Per LRs) 8. Gadda rlhandraiah, S/o. Maisaiah -' H.f.lo.t-SAlt, Gachibowli Village' S 9. G. Kristrna (Died Per Lrs) Aqed about 60 Years, efrlinga Ranga Reddy Occ: Agriculture Rl/o. District.

10.G.Sul:kaiah,S/oGaddaMaisaiah,Agedabout53Occ:AgricultureRl/o' H.No.ls2g,GachibowliVillage,serilingampallyMandalRangaReddyDistrict' 11. Khanarnet shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged about 78 years, occ: Agricult.rre Fi./o . H.No1-58/1 , Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga lleddY District.

12.Syed l(areem, Sio. Khaia Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 49

13. Md. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail, Occ: Agricultue, Rl/o.Gachibow{i Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

14. Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. tsmail Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandat Ranga Reddy District.

15. Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Vitlage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

16.Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

17.Mr.Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ: Agricutture, Ryo. Gachibow{i Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

18. Swamy, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

19. Smt. Santamma, W/o. late Balaiah Occ: Agricutture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 2O.Gadda Yettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally.,Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

21. Gadda Narsimha, Sio. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowti Village, Seritingampally lvlandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.Madiga Pentaiah, S/o. late Veeraiah Occ: Agriculture, F/o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

23.Smt. G. Laxmamma, W/o. B. Shankar Aged about 60 years, Occ: Housewife R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

24. G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 41 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 25.G. Suresh, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 39 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No.2-62 l2lBl24, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

26. G. Shiva Kumar, S/o G. Shankar Aged about 37 years, Ooc: Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 27.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 yearc, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. ii!:T,ffiSF-€-Iffi5r::i:,-l::}: ., ,tl ::':l . !r'i '' ;_:' ,:: ll,'-i : r 'i:,.ii j.'-:r;1'.ffiffi$iiir';:. "' 50

28. Smt. G. Susheela, w/o. G. l(ishna' Aged about 45 year's, Occ: House wife R/o. H.llo.1-44, Gachibowli viltage, serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Distric{.

29.G. Sanjr;eva, S/o. G. Krishna Age/ about 32 years' Occ: Agriculture Fi/o' H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampqlly Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 30. Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G' Krishna Aged about 29 years' Occ: Housewife R/o' H.No.1-.t4, Gachiborrvli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Distric{' 31.G.Jaipal,S/o.G.KrishnaAged'about2Tyears\Occ:AgricultureRl/o'H'No'1- 44,GaclribowliVillage,serilingampallyMandalRangaReddyDistrict.

32. G. Naveen, s/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years' occ: Agriculture FUo' H.No.1-44, Gachibowli wlage, serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 33. G. Pra.veen, S/o. G, Krishna Aged about 23 years, occ: Agriculture RIo. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Scrilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 34. M/s. Kastopa Corporation Rep' by its M'E' Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar Rl/o' 5- 8-57, Top Floor, Kamat l-Iotel, Station Road' Nampally' Hyderabad'

35. Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy Distriet' .Respondents o: 1 P 7 rre ioint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' PetitiorrunderSectionl5.lofcPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in "rroJ oi tft" p"tition' lhe Higtt Court 11y- ^b-e. .;;;"; ,h" i,p"i"tlon ot tfr6 onoer dated 24'09'2016 in Case No' F2l195/ 2014 on it* iii" Counsel for lhe Petitioner :SRl D JAGAN inOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos'l & 2 : SRI ttARENDER PRASAD Pleased "t ctvlL roN petitior.r Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural !.319:^l"t' rgso ag;i;veJ uv tn. oJ", daGo z+'og'zbr6 Passed in case No'F2155112o14 oiin":iri or ilre Court of the Joint Collector-l' Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. Manikr>nda Yadaiah, S/o' Late frtanr.kpnlg.Kondaiah Fl/o' H'No' 1-6711' Gachibowli, serilingjhililv il;li Read, District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) 2. D.Gandaiah, S/o. Late Darapalli B{alqtr..Rl/o' HNo'1-56/1' Gachibowli - Vi[rs.;$tiiingampitii Ranga Reddv District (Died) 5t

3. D. Shantarnma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No. 1-5711718., Rajeev Nagar, Near Pochamma Temple, Gachibow{i, R.R. District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought on record as LR of the deeased P 2 as per the oourt order dated 2411112021 in l.A.No.3 of Z0fr)

4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years, Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chiranjeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: Agriculture

6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture

7. M: Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, Occ: Agriculture

8. M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22years All are R/o. H.No. 1-571611, Street No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District. (Petitioners No. 4 to 8 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner No.1 as per C.O., dt 18.O2.2025 vide lA.No. 112025 in CRP. 5680 of 2016.) ...PetitionerclRespondent Nos.1 6 & 1 7 AND

1. Chava Pakash Rao, S/o. late Subbaiah Aged about 80 years, Occ Retd. Employee R/o. H.No. 8-2-6761118/A6 Sri Sai Mansion, Road No.13 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ...RespondenUAppel lant

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4. Authorized Officer, Land Reforms, Collectorate, R.R. District. 5. Station House Officer, Rayadurga Police Station, R.R. District. 6. Gadda Balaiah, S/o Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-38. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ftanga Reddy District.

7. G. Shankar (Died per LRs), - 8. Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.tvlaisaiah Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-38/1, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

9. G. Krishna (Died per Lrs), 10.G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 53 years, Oec Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-29, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1 l.Khanarnet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged about 78 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-58/ 1, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

12.Syed Kareem, S/o. Khaja Occ Agriculture, R/o. GachibowliVillage Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. S:I':;.:;ii]L-jr:rii;i:j,:i1:i.il:;,-.tl:ilTl-:':::.:l:.'.i;i!i:lii : .::l :i:i:-'..irtrlr,. ' , ..1:. ,:..; ::,.i:;'l'-:*1*ffi1i11]i.ff.:-'. "i 52

13.Md. Ghcuse, S/o- late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingermpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

14.Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, R/o. GachibowliVillage S eril i ngiermpal ly Mandal Rqnga Reddy District

15. Md. Waz:eer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingermpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District tO. Md. Waz:eer, S/o. late Khasim AliOcc.Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingermpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District

17. Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agrioulture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingempally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

18. Swamy, S/o. late Bala Llngaiah_Oc9Ng_riculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, S erili ngarm pally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1g.Smt. Sarrtamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingermpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District

20.Gadda Yettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, l3erilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

21.Gadda J.larcimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, :Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.Madiga Pentaiah, S/o. lqte Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilihgermpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

23.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wrb. B. ShankarAged about 60 years, Occ Housewife R/o. H.No .1 -44, Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

24.G. Darslran, S/o G. Shankar Aged'about 41 ..years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. H.No.1-t14, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

25.G. Suresh, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 39 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.2-621218,124, GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally t\4andal Ranga Reddy District.

26.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. GJ ShankarAged about 37 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H. No. 1 -z[4, Gachibowli Seiilingampalty Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

27.G. Prakash, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 35 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-z[4, GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

28. Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna Aged about 45 years, Occ House wife R/o. H.No .1-44,Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

29. G. Sanjereva, S/o. G. Krishna Aged qbout 32 years, Occ_Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-,[4,.GachibowtiVillage, Serilingampally lvlandal Ranga Reddy District.

30. Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29 years, Occ Housewife R/o. H,No.1-[4, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

31.G. Jaipal, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 27 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1- 44, Gaclribowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

32. G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years, Occ Agricu'lture R/o. H.No.1-,[4, GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. .r... a. .:n-';j::::rrii. ... :r1,: ".-fE!-:-.::iiEiE-4::== EIiv.fjlgr€}f.r.il:i'.r1. :, :,.. ., :..]i:.:,:iii::1i:Ff.-;5, i: 53

33.G. Praveen, S/o G- Krishna Aged. aQqut !3.1e1s-99c Agriculture R/o' "-' 6;hi6*li- Viliige, Seri li nga ripally Ma nd al'R'R' Dist' g4.Mts. Kastopa corporatiol,.ReP: by its M.D. Sri Anil Kurnar R Kamdar R/o' 5- " "5-5i1 foB Fioor,-ftlmuift.itei, Station Road, Narnpally, Hyderabad'

35.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' ... Res pondents/Res Po nde nts Petition under section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil;; in support of the petition,-the- High Coyrt T?y--b" pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 24.09.2016 in case No. F2l5511 2O14 on tne hte of the ioint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. CounselforthePetitioners:SRIDJAGANMOHANREDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos.6,8,10,17,19,24to 33 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for the Respondent No'34 : MS' E ANlStlA REDDY 6 Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and AgricYtl"l Lands Act' 1950 aggrieved OV if,u-OrOer dated Zq.(ig.ZOt6 Passed in Case No. F2l55512014 on the irf6 of the Court of the Joint Collector-;, Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, s/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah R/o' H'No' 1-6711' Gachibowti, 5!;il.,!;'mt;l[ nri.g. R"ddy District (Died per LRs P4 to PB) 2. D.Gandaiah, s/o. Late Darapalli Babaiah $/o. H-No' 1-56/1, Gachibowli 1' Vili-ri,il suii ii nga; pai ty Ransa' Reddy District (Died ) 3. D. Shantamma, w/o. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, occ: Housewife' Rl/o' H.No. 1-Stt17lH,' ii;;eer- Nigat, N;;t Pbafiarnma ?emple, Gachibowli' R'R' District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought on record as LR of the deceased P 2 as per the il;i;A;r oiieo za mf2o21 in l.A'No'3 ot 2o2o)

4. M. Suguna, w/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years, occ: Housewife 5.M.Chiranjeevi,S/o'LateManikondaYadaiah,Aged40years,occ: 6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, occ: 7. M. Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years, occ: Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture S.M.Pravallika,Dio-LateManikondaYadaiah'Aged22years ., .: --, r -.$;i:?7ftlFirE-r,+:':::i' 54 All are FUo. H.No. 1-57tO11, $treet No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy D,istrict. (petitiorrers No. 4 to 8 are brought on regord as LRs of the deceased *iit#;'No.r'ai per-C.O., dt l(aOe.2o2s vide lA.No. 112025 in CRP- 5681/2016.) ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos.6 & 7 AND

1. N.S. Ch:rkravarthy , s/o. late Krishna Murthy Aged 42.ye.ap-o9clmqlgvee nyo. ff .ftfo.48-3rCI'df,Ground Floor GanestlNagar, Chintal, R.R. District. . . . Respondent./aPPellant

2. The SpercialGrade Dy. Collector/RDO; Rajendranagar Division. R'R- Distrit- 3. Gadda tlalaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 7o.yea.rs, Occ Agjiculture nyo. H.rrro.i-aii, dicfrlOowti Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddv District.

4. Gadda. Chandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah Aged about 60 Years,.Occ Agriculture R/o' HN"l-,18/ i, d;6,ibowliViltige Seiilingampatly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisqiah,Aged about-S3 y9?rsr Occ Agriculture R/o. u.r..ro,ifzg,'<iairuOowtiUltage Serifinlampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-

6. Khanamet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged about 78 ye.ars, Occ ngoiCult'lie R11q H.t i6.1 -S8/l,. Gachibowli Vitlage Serilinga mpally M andal, RSnga lleddy Distribt.

7. Smt. G. Laxrnamm4., Wb.B, .ShankarAged about gO V.egq' Occ Housewife nyo. H.fto.i:++, CaCfiibowli, Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

8. G. Darshan, S/o. G. ShankartAged about 41 years, Occ Agriculture R/o' H.rrfqf .++,'bacni6dwtiViiiage Serilingampall! Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

9. G. Sure,sh, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 3Q years, Occ. Agriculture Ri/o' H.f..fo.Z-OZtiBiZa,Gachibowlilviltage Serilirigampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

10.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 37 fears, Occ Agric_ulture FUo. - H. trfo.1-aa, .Gi6triOowli-Village Sefrlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 1 1 . G. Prak:ash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 years, Ogc-Agriculture R/o' H.No.1.44,'OiiniUo*ti Viitage Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District- 12.Smt. G. Susheela, W/o. G. Krishna Aget about 4.-5 yqars, Oc! House wife - R/o. ft.fVo.t-A+; GachiboMiVillage Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

13. G. Sanieeva, S/o. G. Kr-rqlna Aged..about 32.years, o9q Agriculture R/o- H. No. 1 -+a, GainiOowti Viltage Serilingampally Mandal Ra nga Reddy District. 14.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29years, Occ Hou.sewife R/o. H.ruo.t -+a, CaihiOowli Village Seri'lingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 15.G. Jaipal, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about ?7.ye?ry,_occ Agricultulg ryo. H.No.1- - Aq, Gi';hibowli Village Serfl'lhgampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District- .,. -.. :i. . rtiTli.!-4;;r;i,r*qi,i 55 16-G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-44. GachibovttliMllage Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

17.G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 23 years. Occ Agriculture R/o. H. No. 1 44, GachibAwli Mllage Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

18.Joint Collector-l, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS l.A. No: 2 OF 2016(CRPMP..NO: 7362 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2l55512O14 on the file of the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioners :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.I: SRI M V HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,4,5 and 8 to 17 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA ClvlL REVISION PETITION NO: 5683 OF 2016 Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 aggrieved by the Order dated 24.09.2016 Passed in Case No.F2l607112O13 on the file of the Court of the Joint Collector-!, Ranga Reddy District. Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. Late Manikonda Kondaiah RIo. H.No. 1-6711, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Ranga Reddy District (Died per LRs P4 to P8) 2. D.Gandaiah, S/o. Late Darapalli Babaiah R/o. H No l-5611, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Ranga Reddy District (Died)

3. D. Shantamma, Wo. Late D. Gandaiah, aged 68 yrs, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 1-5711718, Rajeev Nagar, Near Pochamma Temple, Gachibowli, R.R. District. (Petitioner No.3 is brought on record as LR of the deceased P 2 as per the court order dated 24l11l202f in l.A.No.3 of 2020)

4. M. Suguna, Wo. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 54 years, Occ: Housewife 5. tvl. Chiranjeevi, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: Agriculture

6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture

7. M. Srikanth, S/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 35 years., Occ: Agriculture

8. M. Pravallika, D/o. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 22 years Ali are Ri/o. H.No. 1-571611, Street No.3, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District. : ....-i:l:,':a':i:1:::-.--:' - - 56 (petitiolrers No. 4 to I are brought on record as. LRs of the deceased iLiitil;il; N".i;s'p; o.o.; di: 18:02.202s vide lA.No. 1t2o25 in cRP'No' 5683 of 2016.) ..-PctitioftersrRespondent Nos'7 & I AND 1.

9. Arrabelli Raiender S/o. A. Upender Rao, Aged 36 years, O..cc Charted. . . . iil;;i;;t'R6. H.t to.2+-i hs, Ramnagar,-Hanamkonda warangal District' K.Picharmma,Wo.K.VenkatReddyAged6Tyears,OccHouseholdWork Fiio. Bhulakstimi Bodhan Nizamabad District' 3:ffi ffiI-t"E:,tifi l#',#:p'#i?Att[11'Ti6?'3i];*"ffi 3?Bn1K'."* G.*:i;1""6. lGgar Ext., Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032' 5sl#"#Elll#si#lBfli fil:rri'?iil',[iti $i-11'xis;3u''f st'"ut il6)+,'iaG6m Nagar Ext., Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500032 PH|SB?1]:HA:HIft .YJf 'Fl],'^lSBliBXtrXffi 133J,,"3f ;8"fi f'"['"' G6;iti N;s;r Ext., Gachibowli, Hvderabad - 500032 Chaoada Prasad Rao, S/o. Satyanarayana Rao-Aged q2 yqqF.'9"" 9.oF, . Effi6;; R6. H.'r.io- i t +t -z-gi Krishiralanka, Pid-aru Road Krishna District' Sp. Or. Dy. Collector & The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajenclranagar Division. M/s.KastopaCorporation,Rep-byitsManagingDirectorSriAnilKumarR Kamclar Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged abou.t 7O.years,-occ Agriculture H6. H. NJ. i-ad, CicttiOowti Village Serili-ingampallv Mandal Ranga Reddv District. 1 0.Gadda Chandraiah, S/o-Maisaiah, H .No.1-38/1 , Gachibowli Village S District. Aqed about 60 years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. edlingampally Mandal, Ranga ReddY

11.G. Sukkaiah, s/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about-S3 years, occ fgriculture R/o' ' ' il.r,,r1.i:Z9, <liitriUowti Vittage Seritinlampatly Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

12. Khanarnet Shivaiah. S/o. Khanamet Balaiah Aged-abo. ut 78 years' Occ. . '- ii;;;itu;; R/". n.No.l-sel 1' Gachibowli Village Serilingampallv Mandal Ringa Reddy District. '" l3.Smt.GLaxmamma,W/o.B.ShankarAgedabou.t6Oyears,-OccHo]sewife Fiijl'n.,rto.i-++, CaCnioowti Village Serili-ngampally Mandal' Ranga Reddv District o 3,81f :!?lt ?&'3;iiffilT#sfl iHl5t'$?,1,1;u'o ' 15.G. Suresh, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 3-Q years, Occ Agricullure Rl/o' . . '- C'.ii.i-aiiaetz4, Gachibowli-Village Serilirigampally Mandal Ranga Reddv "X8",HlJ,",fi?l";3iE District 'l6.G.ShiraKumar,S/o.G.ShankarAgedabout3Tyears,-OccAgricultule.R/o' -'u.ud.i_?+,-eainioowti Viltage Scritingampa[y Mandat, Ranga Reddy District. 57

17.G.Prakash, S/o. G. Shaqkar Agld.?bout 35 yeqp, gcp3gnnul"q Po' H. No. 1 44, c.;hi6'Ilri Vittaii, -S-oitingampafi y Mand a I Rahga Reddy District' 'uR[l*llr?1]fSaYi$.ti,Ufi #,t#,#:,Hf1iift District. #?:tH[", '1Tto3fi

19.G. Sanieeva, S/o. G. ltishna Aged about 32.years, Occ Agriculture R/o' '"'H'lt1}"-1i:GJ;hi6uifiitad.;,'$;iring-r,ilp"tly Manoat Raisa Reddv District'

20.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G, Krishna, HNo.1-44,Gaihibow{iM*age,rtHffi 3H#i'tnnl3il';,R:?5f H'""#f#i,i" 21.G. Jaipal, s/o. G. KlshnaAge.d about L7 ygars; occ Aoriculture R/o' H'No' 1 -4 4, G ach ibofri vtifliil;s;fttindimplrrv fvra no a t Ra ns-a Red d y D i stri ct. 2|'.G.Naveen, s/o. G. Krishna Age! about 25 years, occ.Agriculture R/o' -- H.N;.if+4,'e"ltiuorir'iviEd: Scritingimpatlv Mandal R-ansa Reddv District' 23.G. Praveen, S/o. G. Kris!.4a Aggd qbout 23 y.9a19' Occ Agricultlre.R/o' H.No.1-44, oJJni66ivri'Viift;-:Seritingampdtty Mandal R-nsa Reddv District.

24.Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District' ... ResPondents/ResPondents Petition under section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fifi in-ilpporf oJ the petition,l6e Uign Court t1y- 9" pleased suspend tne operation of [fie om"1 dated 24.09'2016 in Case No'F2/60711 2013 ou tn" file of the Joint Collebtor-l, Ranga Reddy District' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l : SRI A BHARATH KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,4 5,6 : M/s' P SAI RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : MS' E ANSIHA REDDY counsel for the Respondent No.9,10,{{ & 14 to 23: sRl SAURABH RAJ VERMA Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950 aggrieveo uyirre orueraated-24.09.2o1a Passed in Case No' F2l6069/2013 on the tfi of the Clurt of the JointCollector-;, Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. MANIKODA YADAIAH, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah, Ag.,ed 52 years-.. occ 'l'-clcnioo*ti, Serilingamap-lly Ranga Reddy Aoricutture. R/ o. 1-67t r District.(Di6d Per LRs P4 to P8)

2. D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged 62 vears, occ Agriculture Rl/o' H.No.t-5G/ :'6;;[ifii6ivirrib6"i"riringi',ufittv, nansa Reddv District'(Died )

3. D. Shantarnmq W./9 Laie hl.No.167/1' GachiDowr' No.3 is 't1.2021 in l.A.No 58 aoed 68 Yrs., Occ: House wife, R/o D. Gandaiah' RhngareddY District. on record as LR of the deceased P2 as per c.o.,

4. M. Sugu'ra Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs" Occ: House Wib 5. M. Chiranieevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged ztO yrs" Occ: Agriculture 6. M. Mahesh Kumar S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 7. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs'' Occ: Agriculture 8. M Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged22yrs'' (Petitionen;No,4.teq':"":358l'Si:?3#"3ib$"r:rtl?:iitriI:il':'lTIl[?l Agricultttre 34 yrs., Occ: ',.';*l'bHgi{l?3&?X?"r6,ur AND PetitionerslRespondent Nos'12 & I 3

1. Chandolu Satvanarayana' RYo. Ptot tto.Z03 zs,,Y:lf:lff il{J,ff ?ii3,?El3:,f i[";8tr, Business

2. AravaPrrlli Sambasiva Rao' years, Occ Agriculture wo'

3. AravaP,ali ViiaY Houstiwife Rl/o. Kumari, W/o. Plot No.164' 4. Ellina Viiaya Lalcshmi,W/ o R/o. Flai No.332' vynaleya Godavirri - 533 103 S/o. Late Plot No.1 Venkateswara Rao Aged about 67 o+,'nid cotonY, VijaYai.vada-8 Sambasiva Rao Aged about 59 years' Occ RTC ColonY, VijaYawaoa+' . E. Prasad Aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife f,pi,ffi.#t,'Stvimnindr, Raimundry' East Madhavi, W/o. N. VenkataPathi Raju o.27 -8-3111 , SriramPuram' R/o. 11.N about 46 Occ

5. Nadimtralli Houserrife, District Districl.. ' u33g$?,'1'i::ir?13 ",l ),Y{?,},"u;[,.*,13',# ' [tst33f,i,ruYE11Ti$l], W/o. K.S.R.K. Varma Aged about 44 y-ears' Occ ) i' :;r;;il;il; ehimivaram, west Godavari Aoed about 40 Years, Occ mivaram, West Godavari shna Varma, S/o. K.V.S.S.N. Rl/o 27 -B -31 I 1, SriramPuram, i: Aged about 45 West Distric[. Kunac,araiu Siva Rama Kri vears, Ocb Pvt. Employee Godavari District a.

9. Veera Venkataram Prasad, Gatiganti about 48 vears. Occ Engineer' 6ardens, IvladhaPur, Emenlld S/o. Late G Fi/o. M. Sadasavi Hyderabad. . Surva Prakasha Rao, Aged Rao,'Plot No.7, Vasanta :1",,ts1[:"f"t?33fi i,39-i'f 3,''ffi : S.R. Occ Pvt. lO.Makk:na Brammaiah, S/o. R/o.Flat No.201 EmpkrYee, Nagar, HYd erabad.

11. 59 A.S Balari *out 69, yeaG, Enagadda n "H5f Sli,?[€[1!Bi;ffi Hyderabad. jflfjf#'l]S'fr ftf ['ff'I'if E: +3j Occ R. Nagar,

13. Medasani Occ Retd. Street No.8,

14. Musunuru Housewife, Hyderabad -45 Ftat Prasad R/o. H :^ili-flB,Ti:,1t3131fi P"::,?Hil3l,Li3"rt' Wo. M.V. Krishna 104, Mahamoob Rao. Aqed about 59 Years' Occ Apartm6nts Yousufguda, 'uHElBSTH,1ft 1""r"[?5:iiif lf?5#1%"s?13,'?l3lit3i"1?:'xl' Sireei, chittoor - 517ool

16. S/o. C. Bala Ground Floor a bout 38 Years, Oce Garden Park,

17. Sunkara Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Late S. Madhusud han Rao, Aged about 49 1-66/1, Seetharamnaga r Colony, Occ Business, R/o.'15- Khainrnam District.

18.J. Jhansi, S/o' J. 21, Dr.A.S. Rao Nagar, '19.4 . Sainandana, D/o. A Flat No.251, Lotus Fl/o. Aged about 31 years, Occ Doctor R/o' HIG-A- erabad. Aoed about 28 Years, Occ Housewife' hilrajpuram, Via-10 Mog

20. Pandari Empbyee,

21. Sabbeneni F/o.42-748, S.P. D/o. P.S. Pulla Rao' -4, Old MLA Quarters' Aoed about 31 Years, Occ H"yderguda, HYilera bad-29' about 53 Years, Occ Business' - 40.

22.8. Fl/o. Wo. Late B. Kotaiah, Aged abo No.202, H.No. 3-4-5121 1 4, BakatPura' ut 67 years, Occ Housewife, Hyderabad. ,rk jto,X,Tf{ll,H:;i,By?"#?lf,

74. "T??;f,nn"33,0""#166h"3f,;,:H1;,#:"1TY1"

24.KonaoVenkagyl1lfffiS3'3i,.1?rtXl?.5;Yall:iiLlltl rlgl'3-S!lHl,7nJ"i3fi: VisakhaPatnam - 13.

25. , D/o. D. Surya .No.'10-2-1 No.4O2, H Secunderabad-26. Prakash Rao, Ag ed about 34 Years' Occ 0, Fire Wood Homes , West MarredPa llv, *E:ffi [,Yj,"ff ,?l]l3ri.'i."iT;Hi',"'"#i.:fi ?[]3At'9."0o''6evears'occ ,,?i!:t63)I3:ifl:,o$::A'ffi lli.tP-:8,?i""1,t'.?J"tr'occEmprovee'R/o 60

28.RawruT Occ .R. irmala Towers' Rao, Colony, 76 years, Paniagutta, about 37 Dattatraya ColonY, Asir asava Punnaiah, Aged about 60 years' Occ ]6?i["*pet, Am'eefo et' HYd' Occ Hyderabad 38 . Chintak:unta Na Occ Priva te years, Nagar, Hyderabad

39. Gonda Nagcswa Agriculture. R/o' F:/o. 12-1-33119511, mha ReddY, S/o. G. Basava Punnaiah EmploYee, - soo 028 ra Rao, S/o G. B 1-215c11 H.No.7- da Anand a Charita, W/o. K. Venu Babu,

40.Katrag;ad Private Employee, Fl/o.H.No.7-1-2 1sc/1, 4 1 . Kota Pitehamma, W/o. K. Venkat Reddy' Housewife, R/o. Peclapullipaka Pemamal 42 . KabhamPa li Venkata Krishna, S/o. K. Radha Krishna . 6-3-609/ 196, OpP SBH Branch, vears, Occ Colony, Kn airatabad Service, Fl/o , Hyderabad

43.Peri Sldha, W/o. P. Bala Murali Krishna, 196, OPP SBI-1 R/o 6-3-609/ House wife, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. Aoed about 56 Years' uir (U), Viia, Krishna Occ District about 44 Nagar Aoed about 40 Years' Occ . Bianch, Anancla Nagar GotonY' Aoed about 54 Years, Occ 2i1, Gidia Eswar Residency

44. Chaver S arnraiYarn, R/o. Flat N Servant, Dharam Karam Road , Hyderabad - s00 016. W/o. B.S.V o.101 A, H Prasacla Rao, No.7-1-220 and .l l 61 4s.Bodi Padmini Kedara Gowri, Wo. B. Raiendra Rao, Aged about 54 years, occ Housewife, R/o. H.No.2-2-1130111113,l,Iew Nallakunta, Hyd- 44.

46.Adusr.rmilliSanclhya Sree, Wo. A.V. Subba Rao, Aged qbout 54 years, Oc-c Housewife, R/o. 14312, Sankar Nagar, Chandr:anagar, SerilingnmpaHy, Ranga ReddY District - 500 050. - 4T.Jaotaour Raieswara Rao, S/o. J.M. Rao, aged about 62 years, Occ Govt. Se-rvant, Rl 6. 6218., 1 0-3-1 0/1,A8/1, East Maned pally, Secunderabad. 43.Ponnapalli Lakshmi, Wo. P. Subramany€swara Ra-o, AgeQ aQo-ut 52 years, Occ H6usewife, R/o. H. No .9-4-861294/1, Salariung Colony,Hyd'8. 4g.PeddiVenugopal, S/o. P. ChalapathlRqg, Aged about..46 yg.fs' Business, RYo. flat No.104, Kesava Estates, Kavuri Hills, Jubilee Hyderabad - 500 033. Occ Hills, SO.Goqineni Ratna Kumari, W/o. G. Ramesh, Aged about 55 yeqrs' Oc9 -- ftoliewife, R/o. Plot No.40, Opp Venkateswara Temple Vivekanandanagar Colony, Kukatpally, HYderabad - 72- 5l.Tummala Bhawa, W/o. T. Gopi Krishna, Aged about 38 years-, 9qg. - - 'HoGewife, Ryo. Flat No.202, Radha Krishn-a Apartments # 6-3-841/A, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

52.Dr.A. Gopinath, S/o. A. Chandraiah,.aged about.46 years, Occ Doctor, Rl/o. E-I18, Flat No.401, Sai Krishna Residency, Madhuranagar, Hyd. - 53.K. Tulasi, Wo. K. Sudhakar, aged about 38-years, Occ Doctor, R/o. Vijaya Talkies H.oad, Hanumakonda ehourastha, Warangal.

54.Ala Rama Devi, Wo. Ala Venkateswara Rao, aged about 54 years, Occ - OoAor, Rl/o.Venkata Rama Nursing Home, Anakapalli.

55.V Sri Lakshmi, W/o. V. Suresh Babu R/o. Plot No.28, LIC ColonY, HYdera , aged about 39 years, Occ Housewife, bad -73

56.Koneru Satyanarayana, S/o. K. _S_undara Ramaiah, Ageq 999ut 59 years, occ --'E Gidsi, Fi/o. H.ruo.z-io-826, GTS Colony, Opp Foiest Offioe, Vaddapalli, Hanamkonda, Warangal.

57. S. Ajay Kumar, S/o. S. Atchuta Ramaiah, ag.gq about 38.yeap,1Q99 . ^ - Emfjto'Vee, Ryo. 41-2-33, Post Office Bazar,Knshna Lanka, Vij 520013. 53.Goginenti Radhakrishna, S/o. V. Venkatappaia.h,.aged about 64 years, Occ -- priiate Service, Wo. 13-15-9, 158114, Ni<idbrolu Village, Ponnaru Mandal, Guntur District. 5g.Kankanala years, Occ Viiava Lakshmi. Wio.Late K. Veera Anjaneyulu, aged about 63 H6risewife. Fl/o. 1 -9-1 0, Kapra Villageandttlunicipality, R.R. Dist. 60.Alluri Srilatha, W/o.A.S.M. Raju, aged about 4! yerys, 9cc Housewilq, -- dio.ffit Uo.n-tOi, SriSai Datta A-partments, Edst Srinivasa Nagar Cly, Hyd. 61.A.V.M. Raju, S/o. A.V.N. Raju, aged about 43 years,^9c9 Sofhaare Elgineer, - -Ry6.'Fiat No. A-101 , Sri Sai batt5 Apartments,-East Srinivasa Nagar Colony, Hydrabad.

62.Uppalapati Siva Rama Raju, S/o. Late U.V. Rama R.qlu'-aged aboutT3 years, -- ObE ndiO. Engineer, RJo. Ftat trto. A-101, Sri Sal Datta Apartments, East Srinivasa Nag-ar Colony, Hydrabad. 62 "k{,$f;ffi#fr*.ry4ffi"sffi63'*?"H'*'T"ffi "8'?Housewre "fi 'tffi #l*H1Ri#s3'.f:T':'=:ft E:f, l'^f !ffigi:ts":lf"'Sft ri8ff -fllsfdi*lffifi1lx,il?#ffiffirFs'ft r$;Br'ilF.,'ffi ooSg:E:{JE'Si:iX.+ffi ..ftRl""J:a*i,3,?3ll*3#"ft5ao'fl,ff :iE*"' 'B:3ffi Ii"Lu;,Hl?!f .[1ia,,l'S,]iF#"i.?V8l"5"???*ilt:!X1*""' 6s.Iar5ga,rdaseetham8Yi:#i31,{"^!E}11JH,*Xt#"?fr:tf SJf€:' Asifnagar, Hyderabad ' F;;;ffi N"dar, secunderabad - 5ooo61' unSgHtLBffi I" j[?l]il?stYl'^,Y.?1ffS.*'j'1139?n';B:3:'*"lol**' ,oBi#Byft 5;gfl ti*ffi ,}ffi}ffi ;g:*,1i?T,$?ililf,rrffi,B'"in"""'*'o 5;;6;;,il;Iiv'Mina ai' R' R District' "H,f.HlgP,.Ifi *:lHft{,:[tiu,ffi ia$rff i:3#[b:'""""* ,F.*;ffi filli{f,i$';uf !#{i.'i:BJ*H"sr'Pxtshn3i*:B?'"Hs en3['g.jat?.:'a$$; .!.lFi]ii[13,Tl*.fl9fi3nXP'*3"/'"fifr ' ^ ,0I3,,?SiX,g,'o'"'lligli[,X6:li?f.'"[."3ffi'€S33i'"?Htf, :JB1'8P3.,"v, o* kondaPur, HYderabad "'ti:1',1.:1"11'lb"iti?.1r';$ixii1f.fl HYderabad' :x€:E:'"f'If; f,RRffi jl"83Bwi'"" ,uA,yy:[?ls?,B"to';t"i?Hf,%?1":P"11t'.Xi,TaRf'::g'3fr:nsineer' HYderabad. 'Kt3?.X?31'=',iX?,53Ifi ,5llUPfei6\i3..us*ffi 5fl fi;ft **e"='j"1"**' *[3B,Bf.,"iyl"tyiBJff T$[{L'iH?333Y::R#if"'"3::flfl :ffiUl?fl " 5l',Xii,ll" r'ijb:l botbnv' Hvderabad' HYderabad. ^ fl 8ft L[f,:'fi[ [1'- jlSi%i1'il'.:3ifi ::li' ff;'fl&5'":1fi l33li;''"#' 63 8O.Sheela Madhusudhan, S/o. Shankam Rao, aged gbog! 'tO lPats' Occ ""' Eil;i##. Ri;. nai ruci.tb2, sreenivasa fPartlments, vanasithalipuram' Mansurabacl Road, lndiranagar' Hyoerabao' "'t'-i?E?Bl3"H'3;,H#ft l$l3ltki3,l,it5h-i,Ifi aii''ffi -Hsew*e'FU0' *3gffi !1"Y;Y,\[l;i,L"^ff ioi3"'1F#"i"?f.["6;??*ff i,*nX?,*"*' Asihagar, HYderabad. "6?:i93ssff3:'AilAl,1ilrbY{:iilpi!i}l:ffi?',ffifi?f#-?R"f€:' FiJmirao r.tagir, Secunderabad - 500061' '08l:s"ilT*llL

59. j[?l]ilttuwi?'t3J;53it*?'"11s193i,3H$fi'"tXH' j*il?llzts,,sfi 3l?p?f, a:klft:l,?,"J;ffi i,"sB"in""''R"o ".Bi#B:'ft Serilingampatty Mandai, R.R' District' s6.r.LeeraPrasad,s-/o-iXASl?B#['J'.1F"?'t3,:tf:,J:ff Engineer, R/o.576-7' C 'occsofttrare

87.Nukala Radhika Reddy, w/o. N. Sreedhar.Reddy, aged abou! S7.years'' occ ""b';l];;"'"', R6. prot N<i.ai, Sied t'titivim Apts, t56m-ataguda Hvd' 88. Raoot Sarala, W/o. Krishna Narayana Root' aged about 69 vears' Occ Retd' ""' L;;I"y;, iUo'' i 7 - i - Ce ii 1"oi;, ffi ;fi N;bii saioaoao' Hvo' gg.sunkara Harshita, D/o. Prameela, aged about 28 years, pqc sfudent, R/o' ""'Fili'iG2dA, e'Biotr, sri kiiinn-d N"asar, Yousufijuda, Hvdenabad' 90.Shankar, S/o. Harichander' aged.about 56 years' Occ Govt' SeMce' Rl/o' SRT 1020, Sanathnagar' HyderaDao'

91.Kondap^aneni Nasaraju Lakshmi Kumari, w/o. K KrishnaRao,;SSgSlS:t " "F!i;'d;Emprdv"t', No E 18t2' Lab Qtrs' Kancl 11

058. *si1Ll"'#',[?r[-?tlY'73i,?,?,!Iifo8:€gH'*x'.,',flf;,f"8ffi i3:""' Hyderabad - 500 034

93.Jasti Narendra Babu, s/o. J M Das, aged about 58 years, occ.Employee, Fl/o' ""' b;: V;k;ta kri Jr, ni E;t" t";' su mii'i Nagar' Kukatpatlv' Hvderabad' g4.KazaJaya Prakash, S/o K Leeladhara Rao' aged about 27 \'ears' Occ -a?ii.hl "* iiilTi"#d iv" Frr t'No Is, i rl i gS.Chalicham Nageswara Rao, S/o' CH Seshaiah'.aged about-64 years' Occ "" Hljt it.iiri,G"". hlo. +b)' r,,tinjti**i Towers, La-wvcrpet' ongole' nuH%-'i,'i:?,,TPH"iJ9;5:3,T3'i*f ff L?[%:"ffi Yffi t"?ff lE]Fl?I:fu ,,' i ii" Hoirs ns colony, l(ondapur, Hyd. Hyderabad - 500082

97.K Viiava Kumar, S/o. K Kotaiah, g-ged ?b!yt 52years' Occ-Employee' R/o' "'' brl.' il 5 vr',,*;3r;i; i ii;; € 2 Trsl G u ot's' Kd nchanbash' Hvd' 64 *ffiJffi,4[tqft'3J:xl?3"HlR:#f gf,rl:i.dff T("?sf; anbagh, ee. purisadqi,v#{:yd:.r.irs,BlB?ifH[xrrs8;.raliHl#,,rfiffi ' "* "h:ffi ,y;k$:$ir'$Js{#'*qs}1?ffi18?'l"sT"?ff""'""'' ,0,*['Tfl?,:i,0"1*"Yf ;i,BlyJfl 3,"$xki%118,$..i'.13sf.io*Business' ,o,,Rli;[?,1ff8 ?:&Ui? , Pi] ,ffi:".:: S]iRh"B?f 3:ff',:1'"'f&t'llE, il'iiiii,' e"smPet, HYderabad' t "'05'g;l$33:fl,tiSli,Ifl YiJ/Xi:'S:1,,s"1Xbi'"1'&*YB1'3'?fhT"1'"Yift fa ,.-rir#*ii'6i*t*rlai1?;,Yfllf,f^,';83313"*Hilf"X3e.X'.111f;3tu'' ,.'r3l?'f X,3I"t1'S:Bil1'.?iif S:f i.,l'18.r'S?l;3gii"i:3:1*?J,"f "' ,ruay#LBtf#ffi,Il3"$j5".":Hlb:li"Tf f;,S?:ilXf,,:""IJ;,"83f.i?lBt^ Secunderabad. 6;A;, ia;.H Nasar' Hyderabad' rozxagffi :lt1#6"rfi ,5,H$3,Ti"l#?11"1',ilf 3i"'*f8fi;S"f .*"n,,. Vfifi;;b;i a"lonY, HYder'abad ,ouo33'il35ll1[:'.fi f ii[silu:fl li[,"*?lx]l'-[ii9*;H?rk'?""x'#is3E\ Nagari HYderabad' rosoouirSeni[glffi 3!l{?q1fi1$l:r:'r'-rB,'F1?$3Tt,t'T.'*f 8fi '-:"irt"X', [o?dt' Nrgar,'HYderabad ,,0;3?!131TH".,U*lff ETff iYL"-'.,)liffi 3[i:$',i.1gixio35l,1l*,, foidrt Nagar, HYderabad' Nadar, Hyderabad' "'ali3llRl?Hfl :[1il:S$g:'ri"'"i'"Yo?*ff s*tyif trJ'':3?:i:lYears'occ ,,r*Rtlf_i3l5llkfl fli,??f,.&5:'.i'fi UA?Sr"ff",X'.1?h"trr?.?:AsriFvo 1 13. Gaclda Sankar, S/o' Maisaiah.' Qcc Agriculture Rl/o' H No"l -3Bi 1 ' Gachibowli ' '"niiifr;, seriiinsdmpatrv Mandal' R'R' Dist' ll4.GaddaChandraiah'S/o.Maisaiah,Aged..about60vears,OccAgcul. R/o.Il.No.1-38/r'c,;nlLtilfiViirid'S6iiting"mpalli'R'RDist' 65 ,,u6:S1ffi #ifl l[t"?B;}f, iLTf Lfl,,T,]"ffii'HFrFr/o'H'N0'1-?8/1' rro;,fl;ffi i*"?8"fi ,?$q,,?"sl?,1f; lh#,fi B5i#"'"'.f ff6ffi norcu'wo' "/^*""*"s,:'r:n:,f 'r"n,f :s:3ffi s:nilfl'ft lallsn#n*.l3,liiffi;"?ff , itZnga ReddY District' GachibowriMrrase' "ts3{,i65;"iil',r'i:.5i?l?;3:"*3,&,$."{,?bfl" ,,nslffi ;3*i,o:ir.^1?,'sl?HX;llIfi la?firt?ffiY*re'Fvo'GachibowriMrrase' 120. Md. Yousuf, s/o. late,Md. lsmail, occAgriculture, R/o' Gaciibowli Village' ''t;tiifi i,ffi p"hv uanoat, Ranga Reddv District' 121.Md.Wazeer,S/o.lateKhasimAli'Occ-Agriculture'R/o'GachihowliVillage' '''$;ift;;;iiiv-t r anct' t, Ra ns a Reddv District' 122.Md.Wazeer' S/o. late Khasim Ali' Occ Agriculture' R/o' Gadribowli Mtlage' ''t;iifi ;;;;Ii rv-tu j nitu t' R a ns a Red d v District' , r.v115a3,"33i.i1;;,Sr'3if n*#i'fix!""fs#Bi:tH3 ,ros3il,x['J#,J1]""FS5,H1?3k$%"r^g,:istre',R/o'Gac*ribowriMrrase' Fuo' Gactribowri R/o' Gachibowri 't25.Smt.Santamma'W/o'lateBalaiah'Oc-qAgriculture'R/o'GachlbowliMtlage' ''"si.riiiiig"#pirivrr,linct"t'RangaReddvDistrict' " r zoo1!Sd3"Yiil'6:i,h3(i,ff fi3, Y,&31?3k"oo?'rt1#U''"' ,ri,fijnoj3#ffi ffi ;3ili,f,i;$.,i\ililTft iltro8?,tflxcunure'R/o'Gachibowri ,*r,gi$?35n:i"i3:1h3ili,lfj:yf f '€:'^tftr*'ff i"lHH:R/o'Gachibowri "n3;ll,f; *l'ipllilS,Yf ,3":I331,ff ,Ae"SHHi'fi 3J'fi 3f iro#"o'' ,.orR;?,1'o'X:B;?(?;S;i$ft l[31*',ied*''Ji,l,{r'#:'"?H#3i#l'**" "',iR"'r';";033;,"c;'J;iil5fl !1$fl Stifll'i;'rl?lf"i'9tr"1ffii*ffi flf;oo' Ranga Reddy District District. "1,.,3?-Tll#Iilil;i',1v,?;i{Iii!"03f,'rlfitl"ToltHE$#rcurRr/o ,*rR"t{3}f ,.8',.",n"*$,t$f, ,:[t$ffi f"3:*'J"1ir'ffi 3['a"?H.49'S8trtureR/o 134. Smt. G susheela, W/o' G Krishna' Aged about 45 vears' Occ House wife' R/o. H. No. 1 -44, er"n'ilo1'riviriil;' $'if Mlndal' R'R' Dist' "s'*palU

135. G. Sanieeva, S{9'G.t Krishna, H -No.'l -z['4, Gactliliowll Mllage, 1

36. Smt. G. S H.No.144, G

137. G. JaiP;al' H.No.144, 138 . G. Nav,?en, H.No.1-44, G, 66 about 32 vears, Occ Agriculture Rl/o' fulandat. R.R.Dist. 29 vears, Occ Housewife, Fi/o' Maidal. R.R. Dist. abortt 2T Occ Mandal, .R. Dist. Rl/o. about 25 about 23 Rl/o. R/o.

139. G. Praveen S/o. G. H.No.1-44, Mllage, 140. Spl. Gr' Dy. Colleetot a nOO' Rajendranagar Division 14

1. Smt. N. Sobha R/o. Plot No.40' ffi!5Yii$Ys#ffffiftiffR: District. 45 years, Occ House wife , Aged 53 Years, Occ Business R/o'

142. v. 1'19,

143. V. Prabhakar Busines:;, R/o. 8-3-3

144. K. Radha Krishna EmploYee FUo. Anand S/o. V.D S/o. K.N. Colony , Occ about 70 Years, Occ Rtd' Hyderabad . Vasu Deva Rao 145. Mr. B. Jhansi Tpleqom Nagar' mployee, R/o. 146 . Diamond Hills Welfare Association, Rep. by its Secretary Sri P Narayana Lakshmi, S/o Ptot No.175, - Aoed about 5 'Ga-chibowli, R- 5 years, Occ R. Dist. E ReddY, :S/o. late P.V. Subba Reddy by its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar Fl'/o' 5- Road , Nampally, HYd 1

47. M/s. Kastopa 8-57, ToP Floor'

148. Joint oollector-1 , Ranga Reddy District' Responde nts/Re sPondents 1 t.A. NO:2 I petition under section 1El of cpc praying.that in the circumstances stated 'ti:::?lfi:1t::uli,{st;U[:,iiu]eEH'lI"?".1^*T'l'?'%35ffi ;3 # ,ffi;d;; i.-Joini cottector-r' Ransa Reddv District' Counsel for the Petitioners :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REOOY Counsel for the and 107 to 14'3 : Nos. 10,13,19, 23,34,40,46,50'64'68'74'94'95'100 SRI A BHARTH KRISHNA Counsel for the Counsel forlhe Respondent No' 147 : Respondent No.56 : SRt CHITNENI MOHAN RAO SRI E ANISHA REDDY 67 CounselfortheRespondentNos.l23,l25and112,114'116'130to{39: SRI SAURABH RA' VERMA crvlL -REVrsloN PETITION NO: 5731 oF 20{6: Petition Under section 91 of A'P (T'A) Tenancy and Agricultural .!f^:^ld' Order dated 24.5d.2O16 assed in Case No. F2l5886/2013 ,SSO agil;GO- OV tt o"i[#rz, .r$,e court of the Joint coltector-t, Ranga Reddy District. " Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 52 years, Occ Agriclllture R/o.HNo'167/ 1' '' H;iii5;;li, se,iringrr"iiii ning'JRedoi DlstriA' (Died per LRs P4 to P8) 2. D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged 62 years' Occ Aoriculture Rl/ o' H.No. 1_56/ 1, cacnioowi'viiliiJs6niing"liiptty, hangi Reddt District.(Died per LRs) 3. D. Shantamma S/o Late D. Gandaiah, a{ed .68 yrs-' Occ: House wife' Rl/o "' H.r.r-oi-:67i'7l8, -R"j"d "liri;;; G;a"pocninima' remple, Gachibowli' RangareddY District. IPetitioner No.3 is brought on record as LR of the Deceased P2 Mde t.o.at.z+.t't.2021 in lA.No.3 of 2o2o)

4. M. Suguna W/o Late Manikona Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs'' 5. M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs'' 6. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 34 yrs'' 7. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs'' 8. M. Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22 yrs' AllareRl/oH.No.1-5716/1'streetNo.3.Serilingampally,Gachibowli' RangareddY District. (Petitioners 4 to 8 are brought on record 99 !$9 ollne deceased P'! as per E.6:'bii8."22b:r5 ii'l.n.tlolt oi 2025 in cRP No'5731 of 2016) Petitioners/Respondent Nos'5 & 6 AND 1 . Bellam Surender, S/o. B- Narayana Aged about 52 years' Occ Business 2. Smt. B. Bhagyamma' W/o. Late B' Kotaiah lggg g9.o'! 19 lears' Occ ' #;;;*idlidsoond6nt Nts.l and 2 are R/o' Flat No'203' Tarakarama H;t"::td'H, N ;. al q -*i t t +, B a rkatp u ra, Hyderabad -27'

3. Smt. CH, Pramila, Wlo. Ch.V.S'S'N' Raju Aged about 49 years' Occ - Housewife 3 3 $ ff',Y {8$iEH'*'R x::f,T8oo :',"^fiiJ"n* [i.il" 3-'2_bO iTBl r r,loorna! ai, cdio t to I t o, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ""ll 5. K. Sudhir Kumar, S/o. K. Pandu Aged about 62 years' Occ Retd' Employee " iilo]H.r.it):i-oiili. c.i. coronv, aagtt Ambe4iet, Hvderabad 3Ffii3'1"d,"d, y 68

6. Smt. A. Sirilatha @ U.Srilatha, Wo- A'S'M' Raju Aged about 42 years' Occ - Housewil'e R/o. Ameerpet' Hy(eraoao' 'ft ;?#il3i'b:{";i#'hmlHiffi'"##ig'ffi ffi 33"",?""#iceRr/oFrat 'ir,i;5;[3$.i]'Fl'$,Hitr,f;3F*,E1u"A%?'-1i",$33,{i3f;3ffi ", Secundenabad j,Af$fl'"1?ihP'iii'5"''S":1[:o" 'Pllf^[$?1i?il#'h";il'*Sfr,H: 10.Smt. E. \/ijayalaxmi, Wo' Prasad Aged about 46 years' Occ Housewife Fl/o' 1 1 . K. Sivaramakrishna Varma. s/o' K'V's' suryana -?ii,:3:l ' ' iir":'i:8,"DA'.6.'ciuaGrs Lakka Nasar' New Vasa' 3:"JL::':?ffi ' VisakaPatnam.

15. ,ri$;$i?Sp[j.%o[,.B.tY#&ELi]'-""'r3i",Vl*'"'i.'#i,?;t* $;fi&;b;;'-isl neiiilniEii Noslii and 12ate Rep bvtheir GPA B:t'a'.ti3Jll'fi ffi F"r:[l*"0:it.'y3*t,"Eri,:?'Y,#€:s'?:'i:g*""' cotoirv-, 5.n Nag'ar, HYderabad' 13.B. Venkrteshwar Rao, s/o: Late D.S. Rao Aged about 66 vears' occ Retd' Employere *,o fesorari'&-m!-nt F;ctort/, bisanth Nagar karimnagar District. eRr/o 'oR"5fgll%1#Jft P;EXiii'Y"gXHftg3:..',P:Hhx'"U3iB,;?,::Housewif 1 5. Smt. A. Sardhya Sd, Wo' A' V' Subha Rao Aged about 52 vears' occ Housewife Fyo. H.r.ro.r'ai'/,|, d6j'iid Mg;i,'6handanasar, serilinsampallv Mandal, R.R. District. 16 T. Murali Sudheer. S/o. T. Venkateshwarlu Aq99 ahout 57 vears' Occ Retd' Emptoyee Rl/o. Flail.rrldr, iiGi';";' Eiaai,-ptoL t to 33. K'a lyan N asa r - l, Hyderatrad - 38. 'l7 Smt. G. lndu Madhavi, Wo' Ram Mohan Aged about 42 years' Occ Housewife "3Sfi;,'*ifi EH!,?&i,i;s-Yf f;113,*ir:iq:if i'i'i.il1i::d"' 19.CH. Sitha Ratna Kurnari, Wo' K' Lceladhara Rao Aged about 50 years' Occ noia No 1 2' Ba n ja ra H ir I s' Hvd erabad' 5Iir;ffi ,[h'i'p;];#; -ifiIX'66ni'' Govt. S,?rvant

20. K. Java'lrakash, S/o. K' Lecladhara Rg9 {ged^1bout Resobndents No. rs l;ia'26'?Hlfo.Ft"iiiio.so, .trin M'arsh. Jain Housins Cordnv, KondaPur, HYderabad' 28 vears Occ Employee 2l.Chekuri Maniira' D/o. CH. Sripathi Rao Aged about 28 y-ear.s.Oqc Student '' Hi;.'ij: i t;.Zdb:b5lr, Siilnasir-Venneta Flospital Ro ad Beni c i rcle' Vilayawada, Krishna District' "RJ??:f RN1'oT:fi i"ffi #;f}i:i:'fl 'ffi ,do3i?i'133J:f i.33t,""'n"" Prakasam District. 69

23.P. Sunitha, D/o. P. Venkat R.dCy Aged ?tr$ 33 years RUo. Flat No'102, Laxmina rsimha Apartments Barkatpura, Hyd erabad' ,-fi T,,;S$H%,#*?ffibyyg#81f,U"ffi "[if, ,*g:?,?.of#,.jfl ]f i8oru"

25.The SGDC & RDO, Rajendranagar Division. 'u3,111i'$S:?5[:8;;rnffi District. ']1,ffi1*tffi3,?|3lfi iRnlie5'8"f ini8Jl-}* 2T.GaddaChandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah Aged about.60-years,.Occ Ag[culture R/o' -' Vittage Seilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddv -cachi'bowli H Mi -5it/1 : District.

28.G. Sukkaiah, s/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about-53 yg?E, occ -- H.f.foi-Zg, GiiniUowtiV1tage Serilinlampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. ^grlqulture 29.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. B. ShankarAged about 60 years, Occ Housewife R/o. H. No. r -+,i,'6a?niOiiti,ti vitlige Serilinga mpally Mdnd al Ra nga Redd y District. R/o

30. G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shbnkar Aged about 41 years, 9q"3gri"u!!ur9 .R/o- -- H.r.rJi:44, biliiu6wti'Viiiage, 31.G. Suresh, s/o. G. ShankarAged aboqt 3-Q years, occ- Agriculllre R/o. - H. rvoz- aerudiz+, Ca'cfrlUowtiVifiage Serilirigampally Mahdal Ranga Reddy District -Serilingampaliy Mandal Rahga Reddv District. "fi ;.iJl'-i[S"T'i3ffi f'X6:g#,AE:fi B:lii'^lJ"?Ti.ffi f fl 'J:t['6?#'Si 33.G. Prakash, S/o. G. ShankarAged.about 35 years, QcglOriculture R/o' "" H.N.;144'c;;hib;wlivillage,Serilingampafiy Mandal Ranga Reddy District 34.Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna Aged about 45 years' Occ House wife R/o. H. No. 1 -44; 6'a;hi6owli Vit6ge, Strilingampally Mand al Ra nga Reddv District. G. Sanjeeva, S/o. G. Krishna Aged..about 32.years, gqlngri"ulture.Rg, . H.rurl:++,Ga"ftiUonvtiVialage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 35 'uf, T,:::f-itX?n',J3;f v[ffiTi3H'e',1':?""S,''r''il:fi Ii;,R??HH'""#'1"#|;" H'No'1- 37. G. Jaipal, S/o. G. Krishn-a Aged abou.t 27-years,^Occ Agriculturg. ry9 . "' 44, d"hiUdwtiVjtiage, Serii[ngampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 38. M/s. Kastopa corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar

39.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. Respondents/Res Pondents 70 1 I c MP.r z7 83 0F 1 Petition under Section 151 of CPC prayilp tltat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit ReA in sup"poiltif'" p"tition' tliu.nion Court mav be pleased to dH;iil;ff)+n9'zot9; case No'F2/5886/2013 on susoend the operation il;fi;;ffi ; :oini corrector-t, Ranga Reddv Diskict "f I.A. O: 2oF 2 o 20 6 Petition rlnder Section 151 of CPC praying-.that in the circumstances stated p"iitidn'ltte-Hiqtt court may be pleased tf,:irol, i"i"i)iils.zot6 in-case No. F2l586/2013 on PMP. NO 7 "r in the affidavit filed in "'pp";oiitt" susoend the operation il""H;';iiit; irini Cottector-t, Ranga Reddv District' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents Nos'l & 2 : SRI C SUMON Counsel for the Respondent Nos'I5'"''O'"i"Eft"?Ot[', t * Counsel for thre Respondent No'38 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY counsetf ortheRespondentNos'26'"'"''oit*tilltoti'lur3'r=**o Counsel for the Respondent Nos'l5' 17'1g'2O'21'22: SRI A BHARATH KRISHNA CIVIL REVtslo P TITION NO: 5732 oF 2016 Petition Under section 91 of A'P (T'A) Tenancv and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950 aggrieved UV ttre OrOer i"t"i Z+ Ob'ZCj16 Passla in Case No' F2119212O14 ""in"-irE Between: ot ti" Cburt of the Joint Collector-l' Ranga Reddv District'

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o' Late frl"n'.tpn!g.Kondaiah R/o' HNo' 1-6711' Gachib'rwli, sedringainil'iiv ffitU R"aAt District (Died per LRs P4 to PB) , *;"#sXhil"*:ff".""6rH11[or"Bo, $fil t #3a r n * o' - t6/ 1' G achibowr i .n.-;i:;lf*fu$:i"'"?.1,3r"?,"ft X3',."L3fl 3*,??'#,,3'3f '&%L?ffi 'Ffi . District. []jg'"n3t5bBi"*?fi"Nt],x'j#.:il%11?.f;f?0o""'BusinessR/o ml*1.:rtu-l'.?il's?j? s"',flili,P,.':$llsi3'l'3fli:J"'"ffi3:?' Petitioners Nos.1 and 3 are Rep by their GPA Holder Petitioners Nos'4 and 5) S;l*t*U.3J".iffi 'E[rS'iJii:$"T.!E.3'.'lf Jffi 3"%i&i3'6"n" oce: Business 7L

4.M.Suguna,Wo.LateManikorrdaYadaiah,Aged54years,Occ:Housewife S.M.Chiranjeevi,S/o.LatetvtanikondaYadaiah,Aged/+0years,occ: 6. M. Mahesh Kumar, slO. Late Manikonda Yadaiah, Aged 34 years' occ: Agriculture Agriculture T.M.Srikanth,S/o.LateManikondaYadaiah,Aged35years,occ:Agriculture S.M.Pravallika,D/o..LateManikondaYadaiah,Aged22years Allareruo.H.ruo.l.sTt6tl.StreetNo.3,Serilingampally,Gachibowli,Ranga ReddY District. J:f,l'ffi ::R"*'i, j-1"r:;,?f"P#:llf#':"'1S,3lo'-T,,'J.:i3i3tST33 iAi,6. iirozs in'ed'p - 5732 of 2016') ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos'1 6 & 17 AND ;B'I:&TB,TJ[*::mr"'i?,13:ili-Y,?;#'tJ#:liffi tfi ;*b;4. nesPondenUAPPetlant

2. The Revenue DMsionalOfficer' Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4.Authorizedofflcer,LandReforms,Collectorate,R.R.District. "TtiAsed53

5.StationHouseffi@r,RayadurgaPoliceStation,R.R.District. 6. Gadda Balaiah, S/o.G-addalvtaisaia!,4g"d about 70 years, occ Agriculture, Fl/o. H.No. i -Sg, Gachibowli ViiEG, s'dtirng"rdJllv Mind al' Ra nsa P'eddv District-

7. G. Shankar (Died Per LRs), - 8 fi 1?S: 3[ft1H3il,'3fr is?lffi slsS$,?'$:h"S' P,'"]; District. ,ars, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o ndal, Ranga ReddY I G. Krishna (Died Per Lrs), - 10.G. Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah'Agu$ aboy!53.years' Occ Agriculture' FUo. H. No .1 -2g,Gachibowli village, sEtiiing-r*pa lly' M a nd a l, Ra nga Reddy District. ll.KhanametShivaiah,S/o.KhanametBalaiah,.Aged^aboutTSyears'occ Ao ricutture, ruo. H.No. 1 -58/1, O"fi',i6ffiivi ir"gL s C6nga ReddY District' ril i n s a m p a I I v M a nd al', " .lrBr"gJt3H;:li,:{f;ff"1i?"ffi"^fJr"Ji'ti3i#lGachibowriV,rase'

13. Mohd. Ghouse, s/o. late lvtd. lsmailr occ.A.g.riculture' F/o' Gachibowli Village' '" SJtirilgi;-p"liv N6nda[ Ranga Reddv District' 14.Mohd.Yousuf,S/o.lateMd.lsmail,pcc^|9rlculture,R/o.GachibowliVillage' ' -' 5 Jilii gfidili Mdnoll, Ransa Reddv District' 72 1s.Mohd. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali, Occ. Agriculture' R/o' Gachibowli Mltage' ' "' 5;tiii-,is;mp;ll, Mandal, Ransa Reddv District' 'l6.Ahmed Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali, Gell 4gdc ]tyfe' Byo' Gachibowli ' "'0iilg; iiJtin-"gt.prlli Mandal, Ransa Reddv District' 17.Mr. Babariah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah, occ Agriculture, Fl/o. Gachibowli Village' ''' ffiii,U;.p; y r'iranoat, Ransa- Reddv District' 't8.Swamv. S/o. late Bala Lingaiah, ' "' 5;ilt;6; rpaiiy Mandal, danga Reddv District' 't9.Smt. Santamma, Wo. late Balaiqhj,.Qcg.Agriculture' Fi/o' Gachibowli Village' ' -'siiiiii@rpally Mandal, Ranga Reddv District' * 20.Gadda Y'ettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah, O-cc.{O1cy!tqre' R/o' Gachibowli RUo' Gachibowli Mllage' -OccAgriculture' Viii#, i;ditinsi;paflv Mandal, Ransa Reddv District' "gE,' 2l.Gaddalrlarsimha,S/o.GaddaLakshmaiah'.occ^Agriculture,R/o.Gachibowli ''' Vifi liiiiingimpattv Mandal, Ranga Reddv District' 22.G.Madi<laPentaiah, S/o. late Veeraiah,-Occ.Aqr.cultqre' Ri/o' Gachibowli -' Viil;f,e,'iiliriri6impltiv Mand al, Ra nga Reddv District' 23.Smt. G' Laxmamma, Wo. B. Shankar, Aged about 60 years' _occ Ho-use. wife, '"'Hili. nlit-oli:Ia, ciiniobirrivirrlse, Seritinsampallv Mdndal, Ranga Reddv o' l.?1811?:"'J&,8;,iiilllili;t31,'x??[1#ulif, f,io?t"*fl13iJy- 25.G.Surer;h,S/o.G.Shankar,Agedabout3gyears'OccAoricultureR/o' '"'fr'.i;.;-i;iiabilz+, c"cn'ii"oiril'Viriage, s-erilidgimliattv Ma-noat Ransa Reddv

24.G H District. District.

26.G. Shiver Kumar. S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 3Z )€ars'-Occ Agltcg[utr, F&; '"'H.r.r].i:i+, C"ir,iuo*ri virrage, S6riti;gampally Mahdal, Ranga Reddy District' 27.G. Prakrlsh, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 3s.ye.ars, occAgriculture R/o. '''il.N,;1:,i4,'ciiniuowti Vitt-se. 5eritingappallv Mandal' R'R'Dist' 28.Smt. G. Susheela, W/o.G. Krishna, Aged about 4.5 vears' Ocr House wife' '" Fi[.H--nJ. r:++, cicniuo**ri viii;s;: S;;li"s"mpallv Mandal, R'R'Dist' 29.G. Sanioeva, S/o. G- Krishna, Aged about 32 years' Occagriculture Ri/o' '"' H.rutr'-+i, Gacrri'oowrl viilage, Serilingampallv Mandal' R'R'Dist' 30.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G- Krishna' Aged about.2Q.years' Occ Housewife' Fl/o' H.No.1_44, cachibowti virr,jii", S"iti"gJmpiiti tuhnoai, Ranga Reddy District.

31.G.Jaipal,S/o.G.Krishna,Agedabout2Tyears'-OccAgricultureRl/o'H'No'l- "' i.i,-65i'r,iu"*ri Viriigl, Se rili"nsam pallv Mdndal, R'R'Disl *'H.N;.i:a,i:'cainiuowri 32.G.Naveen,S/o.G.KrishnaAgedabout25years'OccAoricultureRl/o' virils;:"Serili;silpittv M'anoat danga Reddv District'

33.G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 23 y.ears' Occ Aoriculture Rl/o' H.No.1-44, Gachibowti Vildg;:S;ritrg;r"paity. rrl'anAat danga Reddy District. 34. M/s. Kastopa Corporation, Rep byits Y D .S.4 Anil Kumar R Kamdar Ri/o' 5- ^ d-lii;T,,pfroot, tti*it H6tel,'staiion Road, Nampallv, Hvderabad' 35.Joint Collector-1 , Ranga Reddy District' 73

36.Gadda Ravinder, son of Late Gadda swam14, qcq Agrtgulturc, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serlingarnpally Mandal, R- R. Di strict - 37.Gadda Devender, S/o. Late Gadda Swamy, oqc-/ Agri-culture, R/9. Qachibowli Viitage, Serlingarirpally Mandal, RR.Oistfqt$[ !^Q,-QIire impleaded as per c.o- tt.'ts .11.1o2:i vide lA No. 6/2020 in CRP 573212016\ ... ResPondents/ResPondents t.A. NO: 2o.F 201 . NO: 7430 20161 petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the orderc dated 24.09.2016 in Case No. F2l19212014 on the file of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District. lA NO: 7 OF 2020 petition under Order lX Rute 9 of CPC RAff Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 31-08-2020 and restore the CRP No.5732 of 2016 before this Hon'ble Court. lA NO: 8 oF 2A20 petition under Sect'on 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay the operation of order dated 31-O8-2O2O passed in lA.No.S of 2020 in 6np rfo.-SISZ ofr 2O1O before this Hon'ble Court pending disposal of the above application. Counsel for the Petitioners :SRl. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l :SRl RAMAKRISHNA PATIVADA 74 ON NO :5858' OF 2016 L REVIsroN Fetition trnder section el of A'P On) relancy;;lf#;51fiS#*lflfr jil'3.11"93;?l'&l6l"ii.tlr6i,:i.,,t":I---"-r District. j:i$lllft :?t"1flttr"9,.1"",11i": *T'[i Between: ,Js,L?,,:nlr"BiiiH:i?,%H5!,lSf, *[?6fl 1?l'5fu1]?;i$l^' , 9;#El*:"*5r.:ru:,a*fr'3flft1L 6';oir^' 1 -56{1' n"::',T*' . g, -;]rTsflfii, H ":l'r, 3a f Ti3'1h3fl *$3 {&3,8 dl",$?ffi flR. SiiiTuLH,:J'rfli,','r[!?'l.liff [,'"f ,tEd"tiledeceasedP2asperthe 4. M. Sugurra, Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 54 years' Occ: Housewife 5. M. Chiranjeevi, S/o' Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 4() years' Occ: 6. M. Mah,:sh Kumar. S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 34 years' Occ: Z. tvt. Srifantt, S/o- Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 35 years' Occ: Agriculture 8. M. Pravallika, D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' Aged 22 years -' Agricultu re Agricultltre tUo. H.No. 1-5716t1' Street No'3' Seritingampally' Gacfribowli' Ranga ^U "r" Reddy 0istrict' j:A,*f t"il,:f",'i8,'Ji'?[lo2],i3fl *Sitffi ."{l3tuoi"*3R?1 ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos '12 & 13 5858/2C 16.) AND^''iX:ll""lliiliuf 3;#,""n"',?';,[,'nl1o{3la}"ii.3?6K8fl "'HrNo1-55' '[:ir,rli;,',:ft["]'^J..',:r!fl1iiif i'f iA"t3:'.13ff Bi"ffi .H:No'1-55' . - u[:lf, i,i: 3illI,ffi ,?:, , ?,;i H:'ffi"4;t8itfS,Yff [?:f,?J]fi,tifl i\ i"?, ;iffi [,1];i lft i *n"?X iU?iBR/o ?o:*11'i0i3,1""..',"i:##ii'?fi fln"?on:%H?i-Be'd''!ly'"u' H t'ro 1 -55' rs R/o' H'No' 1 -55' Gachi bowr i o *o H No' 1 -55' Gach i bowr i yIilu?;'J3, l ?,ffi , H3ii;f Ltsit?3,.L?l /otr'No'1-55' u I,7,%'. ,[1lf, ir5fi,l"?$i,....'"X:3:""$:lriil't4ff3,,RYearsf, x 75 .&llii,tS:?ig:B:;fifj*i,)1ft:".fl:g'*1f,1;H'oT"i'ni"ffi lH"#Hil'5f ' District. ,gft ,'fi District. 331'J5{iffi[*';,l$ilxaliffi #tr#y,rrftfi ;l]No:r-3811'Gachibowri ll3.lglntsEl.o?fr ,\,?Etl|^stH'?$A*,'iu?0,J3fi B'3ff tn"nR*ltf '*" I 1 . Gadda r$"hr", sre _lll;;3,S;,.fj"tgH$Hf#"?i,tr' Village, SerilingamPallY No' 1 -38/1' Gachibowri '''&f ilm",il';1%r'"x133#iliil33:tffi fl District. "1x?Hf 3fir''fi :Fa""r?l"n jf HITS; " fl n:i,ff::li:: ft'*3'f-rtiit*?i3,i,iliilii'#,i,"?bli?'Hli?'Etfr'?ffi '' R;nga Reddy District 'o'SHiff"ffi :lir:{,?,S"?Afi :A3t:$'3t",'X,:'GachibowriVirrage' .,r g'Spflir""[iTfri,';lJll?yf;j fi]All?cc.4sricurture' R/o' Gachibowrivirrase' ,, "$Sl.flin"""ff :[,'rtl?'lel:Hi;J:m!?i#ricurture'R/o'Gachibow*virrage'' X,:''"*'FUoGaehibowrivirrase' ',g33*#f,'r""il;i{l;l?p#1?lt}J38,$fl ''1l1Tn"gg?1ffi :;i"J,f 'fi }llT'H*["o&""ff;BY.tlil3,t*"Gachibowri " B3:ft,\1:,:gi,f ffi Si3, H:n"?s t8ff #[",H:t ,BB,f,ilU;fl re' R/o G achibowri Virrase' 8;l&'i,3i5,ill3ru"i$"."ri'J[ti]:1'"'FUoGachibowriVirrase' Rr/o' Gachibowri vdrase' 'R/oGachibowri Aericurture' R/o' Gachibowri Bg;li,i#li;lflff#Jli'fi:ffi:'a'sJ.?tsAgricurture' .g,i:33,:"Jl,iifi i"flr';ffi :fi JiH:it"?""%t9bc,:lliJf ,, gnxga,15;;';3u'o,;ir"ffilfiE"\ffiru:"li:dffc , ysf,'fleffi:i,ftirtls;11""Xff'€:*98'.,,fltJ,lcu*ure' 25.The Revenue Divisional Officer' Chevella Division' R'R' Distrit' Hyderabad' 26.The MRO, Serilingampally' Ranga Reddy District' 27,The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District' 28.The Jt. Sub-Registrar, Ranga Reddy District' Fr/o' GachibowriVirrase f 76

29.The Jt. Sub-Registrar, Ranga Reddy District' 30.The Station House Officer, Chanda Nagar P'S' Ranga Reddy Distric't' u, Ril Nl;i,ft3T.F!,1;S',i ,ll,Y',%:5Y#ii,1R:fl.3ftr' occ House wire

32.V. Raiendra Prasad, S/o'.Satyan3raJana Aged 53 years' Occ Business Rl/o' 119, SRf , Sanathnagar' Hyderaoaq'

33.Lakshmarn Prasad, S/o' Satyanarayana R/o' 12-fiA./.81' St'No'1 Tamaka' HYderabad.

34.Surender,S/o.B.NarayanaRto.62t4RT,BarkatpuraHyderabad. *'i.No2a 35.V.SureshBabu,S/o.VPBabuAgedabout53years,occBusinessRl/o. LIC ColonY, HYderabad' ni, W/o. V. Sudhakar R/o. 8-3-315/9A, Maruthinagar Yousufguda' ad. llector-'l , Ranga ReddY District'

36.V. UdaYi HYderab

37.Joint Co ...RespondentslResPondents O:2OF :2016 CRPMP. No: 76240F 16 .io i nt col lecto r- 1, Ra nga Reddy District' PetitionunderSectionl5lofCPCprayingthatinthecircumstances.stated in the affidavit fited in .r;;; oi tt'" p"tition, tne xign tuYrt q1Y-!9.Pl9".ttd il;;peration ot t[! oiol' dated 24'09'2016 in Case No' F2l557/2014 on il;il itr"'ni" "ithl Gounsel for the Petitioners :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counset for the Respondents Nos'2 to 7 : M/S' RIu'A GOPALLAVAN TAYI SRI SAIRABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos'8'9 "12'19'21: ctvrL REVI SION PETITION NO: 61 64 0F 2016 : petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenanoy and Agricultural .L1$:1"t' 1950 aggrieved bv tne oroeriateO za Ob zfjr6 Passed in Case No'F2/5884/2013 oiih"-ir"" ol tile Court of the Joint Collector-l' Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. Manikonda Yadaiah, Sio Late M Kondaiah r/o' H'No' 167/1' Gachibowli' '' 3fiii;;ffipurrv-ni^ri"-n"uoov-oitttict' (Died per LRs P'4 to 8) ,2. D.Gantlaiah, S/o' Late D'Babaiah . r/o' HlNo' 1-56/1' Gachibowli' '' 5ir'riri"t,Jrnpittv n'ng' Reddv District (Died) vrs" Occ: House Wife' Rl/o 3. D. Shantamma W/o Late D Gandaiah' H.No.1-57l17i8, R"i'":; T\'6;:"rc;t-'Poc#n{ma Temple' Gachibowli' RangareddY District' "q"d.68 77 (Petitioner 3 is brought on record as LR of the deceased P2 as per c'o" dt.z.+.'t1.2021 in lA.Nb.3 of 2o2ol Agriculture

4. M. Suguna Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 ys', Occ: House Wife 5. M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, agred 4O yrs'; Ooc: Agri9Ultgre 6. M. Mahesh Kumar S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 34 yrs', Occ: T. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs., Occ: Agriculture 8. M Pravaltika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 22yts., -. . . (petitioners No.4 to g are brought on record as lRg of deceased Petitioner No.1 i.". Miiuil.ilnr"o"'i;h;;ff Coirt oroer dated 06.10.2025, vide l.A.No'1 of 2025 made in CRP.No.6164 of 2016) Petitioners AND

1. GADDA SWAMY, S/o. Late G_adda Balu Linga R/o. Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal R.R' District'

2. Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Late Gadda Latchaiah R/o. GachibowliVillage Serilingampally Mandal R.R' District'

3. Mohd. Ghouse, S/o. Late Mohd lsmail R/o. GachibowliMllage, Serilingampally Mandal R.R' District'

4. Syed Mand Sardar, S/o. Syed Ahmad Ali R/o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally al R.R. District. 5, Sved Nawab, S/o. Late Syed Ahmad Ali RUo. GachibowliMllage, S6rifingampally Mandal R R' District'

6. Sved Pasha, s/o. Late Syed Ahmad Ali R/o. GachibowliVillage, S6ritingampallv Mandal R.R. District' 7- Sved saleem, s/o Late syed Kareem RI/o. Gachibowlivillage, 't S6ritingampally tVlandal R R. District' g. Sved Azeem, S/o. Late Syed Kareem Ri./o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally M'andal, R.R- District g. Sved Naveem, S/o. Late Sved Kareem R/o. GachibowliVillage' Si:ritingainpally Mandal R.R District' lO.Sved lbrahim, S/o. Late Syed Kareem R/o. GachibowliVillage' -- SAritingampally Mandal R R District'

11.Sved Khasim, S/o Late Syed Kareem R/o. GachibowliMllage' ' - Sl:ritingampally Nlandal R.R District'

12.Sved Nadeem, S/o, Late Syed Kareem FUo. GachibowliMllage. -- Saritingampally Mandal R R District'

13.Gadda Yadaiah, S/o Late Gadda Ramaiah R/o. Gachibowlivillage. Serilingampally Mandal R.R. District'

14.Gadda Arjun, S/o Late Gadda Ramaiah R/o. GachibowliVillage' Serilingarirpalty R. R- District' 78 ,u.$3113,T1,,{: 3,,$,i;?:'Ramaiah FUo' Gactribowli Virtage' serinngamparrv l6.GaddaRamesh.,S/o.LateMaisaiahR/o.GachibowliViltage'serilingampally Mandal Ft.R. District. ,rBs$fl i.Jfl??lppi"";lilF,R...#iBabaiahR/o.GachibowriMrrase' ,'33$ffir:il.r:?,1,fi l?a.i'R.R:81e,3?1"'"nR/o'GachibowriVirrage' ,'n'33s,0,&5Hil3i!ttJ""hhXti-".fi t ,,'331*t"i:'ftl}ll'lu'"lla3{t.h:ts8fi3,1'' Babaiah FUo' GachibowriVirrase' 'f"i!i.Y:iE..,f,I?t?i :3"offi?1*R/o'Gachibowrivirrage' tatg^Gadd a Babaiah Rr/o G ach ibowri Vi I rase' fl.ft 33f Sss,?&:iffiJ:ff Rr/o Gachibowri Virrage' 5;rlling;m,ailv Mandal R'R' District'

22.Gaddatr4allesh, S/o. Late Ga{rri Ashok R/o' Gactribowli Village' -- 5",ilGl.p"lly Mandal' R'R' District' * ,rr#a:f,R Elgf&Ai'* z4.GaddaEtalraj, S/o. Late Galda Babaiah R/o' Gachibowli Village' - SJrifttim#i[ Mandal, R'R' District' 25.Gadda t:shwar, S/o. Late Gaqqa Mbaiah FUo' Gachibowli Village' -" 26.Gadda frochamma, wo. Late Gadda Latchaiah R/o' Gachibowli Village' -" #rlling;m-pally Mandal R'R' District' 27.Gaddal(rishna, S/o' Late Ga{da. Latchaiah R/o' Gachibowli Village' -' 5;;li"s;,.pallvMandal R'R' District' 28.Gadda lvtahipal, S/o' Late Gadda Eftaiah Ri'/o' Gachibowli Village' -" 29. Gadda :lantosh Kumar, S/o' Late Gadda Bhupal FUo' Gachibowli Village' -" 5Jrir.g'irpillv Mandal R'R' District' 30. Gadda :sadananad, S/o' Late Qadda Bhupal R|/o' Gachibowli Village' "" 5;ili"st;pallv Mandal R'R' District' 5;rilins;impallv'Mandal R'R' District' t,'33,.1,0,fr #il3fiJii,il?;ia1?.9sl"tF"?huparRr/o'GachibowriVirrase'

32.GaddaGovardhan'S/o.LateGaddaBhupalRi/o.GachibowliVillage' "- --r1i'gi*pilly Mandal R'R' District' 33.C. Mahender, S/o. Late SerilingamPallY Mandal Pentaiah FUo. Gachibowli Village, R.R. qaCNarelnder.S/o.LateMadigaPentaiahRl/o.GachibowliVillage' - S"iiiinsr.pitty Mandal R-R' District' 35.C. Sure:nder, S/o. Late t\4aqiga.Pentaiah Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' "" S"tiringampilly Mandal R'R District' 79

36.C. Ravinder, R:/o. Gachibowli Village,

37.C. Devender, S/o. Late SdrilingamPallY Mandal R. 38.The Spl. Grade Dy. Collector & Revenue Divisional Off.' -- Divisidn, Rajendrdnagar R.R. District Pentaiah R/o. Gactribouili Mllage' 3g.TheDy.Collector&Tahasildar,serilingampallyMandalR.R.District. 40.Authorized Officer Land Reforms Collectorate, R.R. Distric{, Hydi'elbbad. bv its Secretary Sri P. Narayana 4l.Diamond Hills Welfare Association, ' a'bout 78 Year3, Occ Busienss R/o. neOOv Slo. late P.V. Subba ReddY' Itltaheihwari Towers, Adarshnagar' 42.Ws. Kastopa Corporation, Rep. by its - A-St. Top Fbor. Kamat Hotel. Station Road, NampallY, 43.G.S.Raju, National Director Maharshi lnstitute of Creative' Masabtank M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar FUo. 5- Rep. Hyderabad. *'Fel',i,tfl ?:a[:3:;."f S#fi ]lni'#:3*Yi"t3*"#'r"il""ffi iffi #[:t'lv" District.

45.Gadda Sankardied, - 46.Gadda Chandraiah, S/o lvlaisaiahnged about 60 H.No.1-38/1. Gachibowli Village' Senxngampaly District.

47.Gadda Krishna died, -

48.G . Sukkaiah. S/o. Gadda H .No.1 -29. Gachibowli Vil Maisaiah Aged about lage. SerilingamPallY 53 Ri/o. Reddy R/o District.

49.K. Shivaiah, S/o. Nhanamet Balaiah Aged.. '-''iiio.'it.t to.t'-58/1 . Gacnibowli Village, Seril District.

50.Smt. G. Laxmamma, W/o B. FUo. H.No.1 -44, Gachibowli V s1.G . Darshan, S/o. G. Shan H .No.1 -44, Gachibowli Vil kar Aged lage, Serilinga about 41 about 78 vears. Occ Agriculture ingampal[Y Mandal Ranga ReddY Occ Housewife R.R.Dist. R/o. Occ Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

52.G. Suresh, S/o. G Shankar Aged about 39.years' Occ "''H.ul):ozizl'a-lza.ci;nih,o*li-village.seriliirgampally R/o. Ranga ReddY District.

53.G. Shiva Kumar' H.No.1-44, Gach S/o G Shankar ibowli Village, Seri

54.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar H.No.1-44, G achibowli Villag 55.Smt . G. Susheela, W/o. G. Krishna R/o. H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village' District. Occ R. R. st. Rl/o FUo. Reddy District about 45 Aged Serili ngampally Ooc House wife Ranga Reddy

56.G. H. s7.Smt. G H.No.1

58.G. Jaipal, S/o. Gachibowli Wlage, G. Krishna 44, 80 'atout gZ Occ Housewife . R/o. Ranga Reddy District. Occ Rang Aoriculture R/o. H.No.1- a-Reddy District. s,EN[1y1?,,3lh$"trffie$Y"Sffi$trIff fi '"ff :'i'J]"J-]'##vobi",,i", 60 fi f................f,::::.'J8,i,36,tr$ilf'fg'ftffii*3"""r"ft"?"i

61.Smt. N. :iobha Rani, Wo. N. Rl/o. Plol No.zt0, Telecom Kumar 45 R.D years, istrict. A:[3:"Ht?&ooistrict Occ House wife

02. V. Raiendra Prasad, Sh.-Satyranarayana 119, SRf, Sanathnagar' Hyoeraoao' Aged 53 years, Occ Business Fl/o'

63. W o. Gachibowli Village, District.

64.Surender, S/o- B. H.No.3-t-512l14,

65.V. Suret;h tsabu, S/o. V. Plot No.28, LIC ColonY'

66.Mrs. V 8-3-31 R/o. Flat No.203' Tarakarama Eatates Hyderabad'-27 F. Babu. Rao Aged about 53 years, Occ Business FUo' Hyderabad -73. about 52 Years, Occ House wife Fl/o' Hyderabad.

67.V. Prabhakar Business R/o 68. P.V.S.R. Das, S/o. V.P' Subba Rao F!/o' 270 G'1' Road No'1 l Jubilee Hills' Reddy, .8-3-31 5/3A, Maruthi S/o. V.D. Rama about 50 Yea rs. Occ uda, Hyderab ad. Hyderahad. 69 K. Radl^ra Krishna Emp loy,:e FUo. Anand bout 70 Hydera rs, Occ Rtd Hyderallad. "il1J,3il,IffiTiiltuY-?fJi#rli$r[fl:1fl?xsbNTit"'a?il?;?lt' 71 . smt. ch. Preethi, D/o. ch. v.s.s.N [aju Aged. about 26 years.Rep' by her ' ' ili#;;.i bFA'noroerCLil.s-5.t't' ryalu njo H No s-2-601/B/ 1' Noomasar' - . iioi"o' r.161o e"niara Hills' Hyderabad' ea'iilti, Hills, HYderabad -34' "irL*1"ff [?":Jif6p{,?ii3ffi T.fi 1'l'6};""*';ri"^fl '^'xE8:x'niln?9,"0"" 73 Chava '3hina Veerabhadraiah, S/o' l?t9.Ko.ia!a!-Aged.about 86.years Rl/o' ' " ;l ii; i :ziiii, <jpp ciiitirivi'sitroot chaitanvapuri' Hvde rabad' Wo. Sri Chava China Veerabhadraiah 74. Smt. Chava Opp ChaitanYa School ChaitanYaPuri, years FVo. H Aged about 82 Hyderabad. .1-7-1

75.Chava Srinivas, S/o. Chava Hanumantha.Ra.o' lged about 36 years Ri/o' Plot '" il;:61 R.;a Nb.eo Jubilee Hills, Hvderabad - 96 8l

76.Smt. CH. Bhanumathi, Wo. CH.Shivaji R/-o' Gachibowli Vtllage' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy ulsrnct'

77.Smt. CH. K. Ustra Rani, D/o. K.Q.K' !ritu!hy.{o' Gactiborvli Wlage' '''sdriiindampally Mandai Ranga Reddv Distrft:t'

78. Dr. K. Manmohan Reddy, S/o. K. Venfgt Rpd{y 4Seq 6q years' Occ Doctor ' "'Hi;: ii.i6.i-4-bis, NimSbti Adda tGchiguda, Hvderabad 79.K. Praveen Kumar ReddY, SerilingampallY Mandal Ra S/o. K. Shankar Reddy Fl/o. Gachibolvli Village' nga ReddY District. 8O_Smt. G. Viiava Lakshmi, wo. c. chandra Mouli R/o. Gachibowli village, --' s6iiiinganipilly Mandat Ranga Reddv District'

81.Smt. P. Prameela Rani, Wo. Prasad Rao Ei/o' Gachibowli Mllage' - "Seriiingarnpally Mandai Ranga Reddy District' B2.Smt. T. Padma, Wo. Vijay Kumar Aged49 yeaF, gcc Household R/o' H' No.1 1 -1 -1 1 2, Bapunagar, Saroomagar' Hyderaoao'

83.Smtl T. Swama, Wo. T. Virupaksha Aged.4.9 yeap, Occ Household R/o' -'' H.iG.i'1 -i -i t 2,'Bapunagar, Saroomagar, Hyderabad'

84.Smt. V. Shankuntala, Wo. Muralidhar Rao - Ag.ed 56 y,ears' Occ Household FUo. H.No. 1 1 -1 -1 1 2, Bapunagar, Saroomagar' Hyoeraoao'

85.A. Sarathchandra, S/o. A. Anjaiah Aged 42 years,.Occ Business Fi/o' *"ri.N6. ti-i -i iz, Bbpunagar, Saroornbgar, Hvderabad' 86.Smt. B. Sanoeetha, Wo. Late B. Ramesh Age{.60.ye4rs'.Occ Household -- nyii. n.tlo.t i-1-lli, Bapunagar, saroornagar, Hyderabad' aTsmt.HameedaBequm,W/o.GulamDastagirR/o.GachibowliVillage' -'' Serliingampally Ma'ndai Ranga Reddy District' 88. G ulam Manstaf a Khan, S/o. Dastag iri (fta.n. Yo' Gachibowli Village' -- Seritingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Oistric{' 8g.M.PurnachandraRao,S/o.M.VenkatRaoRl/o.GachibowliVillage' Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District'

90.smt. M. Bhavani, wo. Sudhakar Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

91.D. Venkateswara Rao, S/o- Sri Lakshmana.Rao Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' - "Serltingimpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

92.V. Ganqadhar Rao, S/o. V. Veera Swamy Aged about 71.years' Occ Retd' "' ilr;k;;6Fv;. ir. t io. I i-z-zo9lc/87. Padhanabhanasar Mehdipatnam' Hyderabad.

93. Smt. D. Amrutha Vahini, W/o. D1. lrgb!?\a.r fao R/o' Gachibowli Village' - - Seritingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' Sijiiiingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

94. Smt. B. Chandana, W/o. B. Chandia Sleka.r Rao Fl/o' Gachibowli Village' - q5 smt- P- Javamma. W/o. P. Balavantha Rao Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' -- Seriiingam'pally Mindal Ranga Reddy District' 82 Ranga Reddy Distriot. $;I33f:Y.fl1Rao, S/o: Raghavaiah R/o' Gachibowli Villase' Serilinsampallv *iT,".TIf "f ;,ffi ;'iJ;I?Ll$[ffi i$P,,?':3lfi fr E"trf"iif il'?'?Xli:o" 97.Smt. M. \/enkata Lakstrmi' Wo' S-ri-Venkateshwara Rao Rl/o' Gachibowli "' Viri'i's;; ddiingampaitv wt-andal, R'R'Dist' * oo smt G llatna Kumaii; W/o. Rarnesh Ri/o' Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally -- ,oo."*,ng*1il*Xilffie:3.r{hif.:?,f3.$li?Tuddin Rr/o' GachibowriVirrase' 1o't. B.V.B.V.N'P. Kutumba [4o, S/oNarsaiah R/o' Gachibowli Village' ' "'seritiniamp-ariit'iiindat Ranga Reddy District' ,or.o*n3},i5,1il,ffi,3"ffi $xaHltd"d$HsarRvo.GachibowriV*rase' 103. S,nt. S.V. Ramana, Wo. Lakshmaiah Fl/o' Gachibowli Village' ' ""seriting-a;pitii Minoat Hanga Reddv District' rvi""oii ttinga Reddy Districf' '00",",n"Y;R[iii,,ffi #!A:H,?j!;!13"t3#?81ff .."iff 'ouAo,""i,l1#;'&'3{t"Yl"*}!"?Bl3lfi ',[lfl tllJ.?B5a"* gS?:'+?:?5vears',occ 'ouu,,,,n"l31;lfr"JHy*ffi ft HtXi'#',.1YElLt},r"B3?...T'""0R/oGachibowri ,orr,.,nu?l"s;g?S;5l?:HBlh:iflrlsi"Tjisedabout4evears'occ

108. K. Nagendra Babu,'S/o' Qeqqrie-e. flgt Gachibowli Village' ' ""Seririniirm-fb-tty Mindal (anga Reddv District' 109. Sharath Babu, $/o' P' Sqtyanarayana.R/o Gachibowli Village' e rl i n gli ;Gliv-tr,tinoai Ranga R-eddv District' ' " "S Mandal, R'R' Dist' trl, Gowri Shankar' S/o' C' Chandraiah Rl/o ' Gachibowh Village: {1nF'ViiavaBhaskar.S/o.SatyanarayanaFl/o.GachibowliVillage' '' "Seriring,rnir;iiiy Mandal' R'R'Dist' 111 ' ' 'serilingimpally 112. E:. Bhaskar Rao, S/o' Sri-Gowri 9tlqltgt Ri/o Gachibowli Village' ' '-seririnslmiatii ManAai Ranga Reddv District' 113. Simt. N.Lalitha,Wo'SriRaghavende4rR/o GachibowliVillage' ' '"Serirlng;miiiiy tuanail Ranga Reddv District' 114. Iimt. N. ShobaRani, Wo. Viiayl]<ymar R/o Gachibowli t/illage' ' '-Seriring;mi,aiiy ManOat Ranga Reddy District 115. Iimt. Padmaia Naidu' Wo' Prablakar.Rao Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' ' '"seririniamiritV MihOat Ranga Reddv District' 116 \/.S V. Narsimhi fiBflth?l;& A:efif;Afffltl R/o Gachibowri Village, SerilingamPa 83 ,,rs.n,,nn"J;.1iyr.Xf #S*#,,ft lftttv&#,i:F/o'GabhibowriVirrase' ,,r.u*,"*,i:-Tfl immi,Bs*taY##nR/o'Gachibowrivirrase' ,,n"n,,*rj*,ilirrfif*L1df*"yeff ,[,l$,ll?lr"reFi/o'GachibowriM*age' ,ro;*"n jg*?ilff#tT,UtE":'"1Hli}.!'ssiRi*gFUoGachibowri 1r1 ' -'seriting-ampafly Mandal, R'R' Dist]ict' Settuoalli Suresh, S/o' Late Koteshw6r Rao R/o' Gachibowli Village' "iffi "ffi f Fligffi fr s,tEfiftffi Fff,H'#ns[r''#r' "'o""r,?l"T"1oH,.l"#3i,tf l3lla?'.3;"'ft :[ilf,"H3XH,1/%X13lnl'o"uu'"'*' -,,Ano:lu1o"" lz4.Aravapaliq"qlo?S,H?"T6t.,g:,ff Xf BIffi ",#Xlif;ff Hyderabad. 67 years, Occ Agricultul ,ruo"",..H$ff BufuY,361qlt#,fi ,3"S3irli[5i"t??'"i]boutssvears' ii;fiiliJty, ErstGodavari - 5331o3 "u*.,""5115.'*H:nif, ,f 35I#J;?rEI&"3Sf"'"'3:3i'r:?"u'[1ffi;:'" "'o""r;,?0.{1P"1"#iiift X:Yl3-JliY:SH:?ffi l?:A1H'ffl ""1'1:"#:'l'u"f '"' Godavari District. 128. Nadimpalli Sa ?f E:8,:t' S'g Jiy'ff #?lii3 t1"i"fr:'.f BI33f;. Occ Housewife, R/o. District.

129. KunaPara occ Housewife, District. H,5i%Sft ,t',,?#ilHY?lH:*?:*':ff '""1]'€JoiiE;' juAsed ,30;oo,t#l#ff#'Fft Effi5El[?J"rT3].:i?t,.Y,',"'#;[l 66imlvirim' West Godavari Distdct' "'$#,ftq+,}iF#ff"'r}fl,3'Efrlsl):i'#i"#,:'.,'iJit?I'8ffi "'o.",#*["i3,33Hi??*fi11[1':JgffJATTs#P':t1R::;?uif S.R. Nagar, HFeraba<t. f':ia''' ' ";"",.. 5::'ilT33""$i€nff 'F*i'*gi $;3itxl"1iil,;',1'? 4?"?|y?'?5133a'' Hyderabad. t3'' 84 ,ror",,#igo€ff, Hyderabad. t${}R3y,i"j!1#i38"%1ffi .'rfl:*S,?".!+'":{:ft fdf: "'r,#[lHEft ,ltF-"gsrf ,fi,li"r,:'[f^s131fi "uo""-i['i:$i*:Jx:'L'ffi r'.,T'f ##,H.T],ifffu1fl""$f]"""+l::J'""' ffi i'x?n'"u' Hyderabad - 45. "'irl5fi,!f'$**,]imtfn:H':1?"-el:h$31ffi'"f'l'E^"*n:l's1'n*'onv' AJirsnd rasar'' HYderabad' "'o""*35;J;35:H,1:Iii515i',91,13,.?;3?il$3BIA3:':3::'$Bx:-1"' 139. Sr.lnkara Sambasiva Rao, S/9'-!3t9 S'.Madhusudhan Rao' Aged about Seetharamnagar Colony' 49 vears, Occ Business", iilq' 1-+i-60/1 Bhidrachalam. Khammam L'lslnct' ' 14o.J.Jhansi,S/o.J.Ramakrishna'Ag-edabout3.tyears,OccDoctorFUo. ' ' Hte-n-Zt' Dr.A-S. Rao Nagar, Secunoecloao' EmPloYee, FYo. 17-4, I 'o'ro,""*i,,!.H3:fi11i3'r"dllSltTiif :k'tat"?n""?3$'?il:ifj?3" 142.Pand-arrury"9"3pratiivrDr_f; &?;,!*|'r[3:d,%:1ft?::H;#if 't* 'o'ru.,n"331&T'#??E':f H',tit"?nitji5ii:tfi'"?:'??":t53vears'occ ,i,"tn€,fl TIIii,'"$'&,ti:ft 3 #:e',1eli i:3:*t"r1131'f sn'3'T oo*ou."fi 'ounou."ll,i3,t/oiF8i'lji,Yli$?,t'i,::t"':4fl ##ri:"i:BlJffi -ff :, 146. fi,ona Venkata Ravindranath' S/o' Late K'V' Krishnaiah' Aqed about 39 vears. occ ooctor, rulliiliiG.zba, nrpan-Resioencv, H. No.52- 1 0-32' R'V' Fatem, Visaffrapatnam - 13' HYderabad - 74. '

147. rs, Occ inaei SamYuktha, D/o. D. Suryra Prakash Rao, Aged about 34 R/o. Flat No.402, H.No.10-2- 10, Fire Wood Homes, West r, , Secunde rabad-26. '*;""o,ll#,l5,Y:l}#:S::31'-sIfll#{,";"?"'*?;3:liiiA*3#%*'n ?li' ;'3"'5'l'o "na," r,"ia:Tw3i"'!?!:i3di.,'gl€:?:'*:31sHj"-:3,If "o;""ollil',fl J"Tfl,,i3',ffi ?tI',&l,.hY"'$Hl3il?ifl,*3?;39..it31""#''u Fiti'gutta, HYderabad - 82' 85

151. R. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. R.M.C.V. Prasad Rao, Aged^about 56 '- vears. Cicc gusine$ilnlo. lO2, Ninnala ToWers, Dwarakapuri Colony i'anjagutta, HYderabad - 82. ' "

152. Madduri Kamala, Wrb. Dr. M. Veem Raghava.R*ay' {Oeo -about i??Eo?ffi lAlffi , hio. H. r.ro.6-3-e07/1 /A, kapad i a Lane, som aj is ud a, 153. Madduri Mahesh, S/o. Ro. M, V-eqq[qghg'.q Red.dy.Aged about 44 '--r""o, O61Jpvt. gmpioiee, Ryo, H.No.6-3-9O7l7lA, Kapadia Lane, 75 Somaiiguda, HYderabad' 82:

154. Madduri Hari, S/o. Dr. M.Veera Raghava Redd.y, Age! abo.ut 5] Years' '- bcc pvt. gmpbyee,'R/o. H.No.6-3-9O7l1lA, Kapadia Lane, Somalrguda. Hyderabad - 82. 'uuu,"",[:33;fl11yJ,it3h?5:3ii'"Y-"d,1 Palbvaniha, Khammam District. j,:?'#,'13[il'Sff 8;$;$auout Jamoala Pramod Krishna, wo. J. Radha Krishna Murthy, Aggo about 1s6 ' "t ry""o] Oii H"L;ewi6 i W o,.l -'l' -21 1Cl 1, Balka m pet, Ameer'pet, Hyd - 157. Fuftaqunta Ravi, S/o. P. Venkateswarlu, Aged about 62. years,.Occ ' "' Businesr, iVo. ij. f..td.Z-i f6 i g 126, Gayatrinaga r, Am ee rpet' Hyd era bad' "uoo*ss"?f#ffi #"i'31,'*Sj3;:iy"1fl ,[xTf, iil#r%ii^?,H:I,'$,x?1r;;,3:[Nl 159 '--Retd. Veoicharla Srinivasulu, S/o. V. Narayanaiah, Ag^ed aboutTg.years' Occ Gofi. Servant, R/o. H.No.12-2-4591N20, Amba Gardens' Extn' Mehdipatnam, HYderabad.

160. Chintakunta Narasimha Reddy, S/o. G. Basava Punnaiah,49"d about '--3T vears.-OCC P,ira[-ffip6yeb,-nf,i.'12-1-331195/1, Dattatraya Colony, Asif Nalar, Hyderabad - 500 028. 161 . '"'years, Gonda Nagesrrara Rao, S/o. G. Basava Punnaiah, 4geO about 60 O"i'ngricu]trr,;;Fyd. ft.ito.Z-t-215C11, Balkampet. Ameerpet, Hvd'

162. Katragadda AnaryIa Ch-arita, Wlg -!! Y."lu Babu' Agqd about pJ Vears' occ private Eilploi;.'R/o.H.No .7 -1 -21 5C/ 1, Balka m pet' Ameerpet' Hyd 163. Kota Pitchatnrna, wo. K. Venkat RedQy,.A.g.ed about 56years' occ ' " "Horr"*-''fi R6.' Pfi;prltilipafa Pemamaluru ( M ), Vija. Kri shna Di strict.

164. Kabhampati Venkata Krishna, s{q. t<.-Ba{ha Krrshng lt/urthy-Ageq - iUout +a i"".s,-OiiS"Mqg;R/o. 6-3-609/196, Opp SBH Branch. Anand Nagar Coiony, i<nairatabad, Hyderabad'

165. Peri Sudha, wo. P. Bala Murali Krishna- Aged aboiiJ .40 ysa.rs,' occ '"-Horr"*if", rud:O:S.bdsiliSO, Opp SBH Branch, Ananda Nagar Colony, Khairatabad. HYderabad. h;id'#t, -or'aiini lGram Road. Hyderabad - s00 016 'uu;"",.,,3:3'S":,1Xf '{ilffi JYfi'^:rh[?::lr^frXt}S?:6,?'?JL'.1,' 167. Bodi Padrnini Kedara Gowri, W/o'-B'. Rqign$ia Rao'.Aged about 54 '''years, oL" Hoiii;;if;;R/,;. H.ttto.l-z -ttzotttti3, New Nallakunta ' Hvd' 44' 86 tuuo""'.*'*'Si"fl[?r?E*Hi"';,*X;,iiir'ft tr?S?S"1fu"#.1oof'f, I nandf n:OOV District - 5o0 050' ,unno*.r,&i5,yf lff Bi7,iiff :io?{',o*#ffSi'ft gfl gf H',$,%?"[?XEa3ffi o. &'trif ftffi $- "1""*,&:ii3i|l,hi'll$il",s;L?HBiE$]?i1%"x'3fr,ff 171. Peddi Venugppal, S/o' P' Chalapathi Rao' Aged abor{-f6 ye.ars' Occ "'eusinelJ,-frio. FiiiNb. rbz. keiava ectates. Kavuri-Hills, Jubilee Hills. Hyderabad - 500 033. C6toni- iltit<atpallv, Hvderabad - 72' "'"ou""Sll?,h%:EeTft Xxt"&l'i,-%"?;[3il3*tt*?1""$i":''3iJfi 3,*"?# 173. Tummala Bhavya, W/o' T' Gopi Krishna' Aged about-38 yea ' '"Ao*"*ti'I.'ir7d. Frit No.zb2. Radna krishna Apaitments # 6-3841 rs; Occ IA, AmeerPet. HYderabad'

174. Dr. A. Gopinath, S/o. A' Chandraiah aged-about 46 vears' Occ Doctor' R/o. E-118, Flat No.+or ]'s"jiitis'fi; Re'id'd;v' Madhuranlgar' Hvd' 175. K. Tulasi, W/o. K. Sudhakar, aged about 38.years' Occ Doctor' R'o' ' '"ti;ry" ti rkiiii n"jit' Hinumakonda ehourastha' warangal' 176. Ala Rama Devi, W/o. Ala Venkateswara Rao' aged'.about 54 years' " "o"c o"i6i,'riio. Venfutj nama Nursing Home' Anakapalli' lTT.VSriLakshmi,W/o.V.SureshBabu.,agedabout39years'Occ " 'nou"e*irZ,'ilo.-ijoi'tlo za. LTC colony, Hyderabad -73 178. Koneru Satyanarayana' S/o' K' SundgEr Ramaiah' Aoed about 59 vears. ooc Business, ru|lti.ilblz-iti-'i!'6' GTS colony' opfl'Forest ffice' Vit'aipz,tii. Hanamkonda. warangal 17g. S Aiay Kumar, S/o. S' Atchuta Ramaiah'.aged about 3S y:-e^a.l:'.Occ " "irptoyi",'Ri"'4i-2 '3i' P"st'otRce eazar, KrishnZ Lanka' Vij - 520013' Guntur [)istrict. "0o"",,3:flJ'33$[3lRilli!113', "r.Xi,".:RTal,i?3ftii]ii'33s1#"Tf,**ffiff;i, nkanala Vilava Lakshmi, W/o.Late K' Veera Anjaneyulu'.aged about 181 . 'oE"'ii6r'.'6fr nio. i -g-t o' Kapra Villageand,Municipality' Ka 63 Years;' R.R.Dist. 'r"l Alluri Charitha. S/o. A.S.M. Raju Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' 'tA, '-teriling€rmpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 183. A.V.M. Raiu' S/ o A.V.N' Rqiu' aged about 43 years' Occ Software '""inoin"ei, ivo. irit'ruo n-irii, SiiSiiDiua Apartmerits, East Srinivasa Na[ar ColonY, HYdrabad' '184. '"Lro. E,'"ER"io. Engineer' nyo. Ftit No .A-101, Sri Sai Dafta Apartments' tJppalapati Siva Rama Raju, S/o' L-atg^t] V-: $sqrqRgjutaged about 73 E-"li-Srinirrsa Nagai colony, Hyderabad' 87

185. lnampuri Gowri, W{o'-[' Rama KrisJrna' gg-e! about 60 years' Occ -iil"'"h6ih a m E ncl avb' An a nd nas a r' Ho usewife, ruo' E-It2ed Fi;i ffi 70i ; Xniirataoah, HYderabad

186. Aisha Khatoon, Wo. Ahmed Abdul Haleem, {g"q i ; r\ro zamzahi M a rket, De s i ' " "no r."*it! : M .?:f61 6:i€6 lST.SheelaMadhusudtraqS/o.ShankaraRao,.aqedabout46years,occ B usiness, R/o.'ffii: i6lta 5 t=eriiii'sa ap{ttmentsl va nastha I i p u ram' [,ffi;;46;d il;a: indiranasar' HYderabad' about 49 Hospital, years, Hvd. ' Occ

188. N.-Prasanna, wo'-M' Amailier:*,k,?93:S:fi,lilflJ"'iho,%'n0,,, Hyd - ' ""Hor""*ife,' R/o.4€-1 35, Sreekas 189. Ungarala V.V-U fri9frna.$ao' S/o' Lale p'f, Swamy' aged about 52 vears. occ euinlls, Hi;:'F6i-ltioli6r' s'V' Cara Heaven Dattatreva Nagar' Asifndgar, HYderabad' '

190. SmL Yarlagadda Seetha Mahalakgh-ry'Wo' Y' Krishna Rao' R:/o' Gachibowti viliffiE:$;lftilHiiv rtlinoat Rbnsa Reddv District' 1e1. chowdavaram JhansiRani, wo. M.s.r.Ram Re!:l 3%ff e:?:ttl o'y""o, 6;; H;i,#fri;, nyo I z-t - 391 tt 18' Saraswatl 1g2. Mannem Manorama,-W{o, M' Krishna Motran Reddy aged about 60 "i"6n'"H#5,*B##,''?r$;ftu:i;ikt-ft Jr8?Jsl;Apartments'opp 193. Tunuguntla Tara Seshg KumaqW/-o.' f-,q19 T Upendra Gupta' aged about so v""rl, ti"tir!i"6wrf",'H6:'p6i Nb.10i, cehtral Part-ll Apartments' Dharam raraii i;;d,'Bailiampbt' Hvderabad - 16' j:Ei"P,tsla[',Fi,?^l[?S?:t31il[3"?#'33'3ff ','\ff vears',occ ,nonou""fi .15:E l95.YalarnanchiliSriKu.m?fl,.W/g.Y.Bagiradha,aqedabout53years,Occ Housewife ruo AtpHA-710, Hr-i""ii Cilv Fio"o, JayLbheri Silicon county, kondaPur, HYderabad'

196. lnampudiGoraryi-,-Wo' l' Rama Krishna' about 60 vears' Occ Housewife, Fyo. 6-3-62gt4. Flati[".i0:i"Ftirubf'otn'm Ehclave' Anandnagar' kniiratauaO, HYderabad' o"" 1s7. Aisha Khatoon,Wlo:||med Abdu! Felee'i t%11 n|3;lil il!3"' ' -' Hour"*ii" : Rd.?. N;'.s-g-go t, l'llozamzah i M a rker lgS.SheelaMadhusudhanS/o.ShankaraRao,aqedabout46years,occ Business, nrc. riat. N o.1 o2.s.rJnirisa' Apartments] Va n a sth al i p u ra m, Mansu I"lio nobo. indiranagar, Hyderabad' Housewife, Fyo. 4-ti-135, sreeulnl;;'itti""' cowriguoi' Ram Mandir' Hyd - 12.

199. N- Prasanna, W9r' M' Amarender' aged about 43 vears' Occ

200.Smt.LingalaSeethaLakshmi,Wlo.Y,KrishnaRaoRJo.Gachibowli ' - -ti I 1"s", 5 i;;iiiiig%fr1In-v M' no 2Ol.ChowdavaramJhansi3"nl'Wlq.tvlSJ,RamReddy'agedabout33 vears, occ Housewife, Rr/o. 1 l -\lib\' iltb,'$ir".*ath i n ag ar, S a id abad' [{yderabad.- 59. Ra ng a Reddv D i stri ct' "i 88 2O2. D,3rugula Eedaiah, S/o. D. Sqnjayit,.aged about 62 years,.Occ . .... --Busineis. pJo. C/o. D. Nirasimha, odp Shilpa Apartments, Kondapur Village' I Serilingafupally Mandal. R.R. District. 2O3. T. Leela Prasad, S/o. T.V. Anjaneyulu, aE:d about 31 ygaq,pcc -- Softrlrrare Engineer, R/o.576-7, Old Post Ofiice Street' Patamata, Mj' 2O4. Nukala Radhika Reddy, W/o. N. Sre'9har Reddy-. aged about 5.7 .. . --' years. Occ Business, Fyo. Plot No.33' Sree Nilayam Apts' Domalaguda, Hyd' 2OiB. R,aoot Sarala, Wo. Krishna Narayana Root, agqd about 69 ye.ars, Occ -- n to. eniptoyee, Ry6. 17-1-383/104 A, Vinaya Nagar, Saidabad' t{$. 206. Sunkara Harshita, D/o. Prameela, aged about 28 years, OccStudent, Ri/o. Plol No.20/A, B Block, Sri Krishna Nagar' Yousutguoa' HyoeraDao' 2O7. Slrankar, S/o. Harichander, aged about 56 years. Occ.Govt. Service, R/o. SRT 1020, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. 2O8. Krrndapaneni Nagaraju Lakshmi (qfqti,.\ (9. K.Krishna Rao' aged --ibout 54 yeais, Occ Em-ptoyee, R/o. E 18/2, Lab Qtrs- Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad - 500 058-

209.. R. Sivaram Reddy, S/o. R Gyrivi, aged about 42 y-ears' Occ--Cdmpany -- Secretary.Rl/o. A-2o4, Baniara View Apts;Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034.

210. J. Narendra Babu, S/o. J M Das, aged about5-8.years., Occ Employee, - '-R/o. G-i, Venkata Krishna Estates, Sumitra Nagar, Kukatpally. Hyd. 211. Kzza JayaPrakash, S/o K. Leeladhara.Rao, aged. about2Tyears,.Occ -' 'Ernployee, RyolFbt No.S. Jain .Adarsh, Jain Housing Colony' t(ondapur' Hyd. 212. Chalicham Nageswara Rao, S/o. CH-Seshaiah, aged about 64.years' -' -b"c Retd- Employe eiV o. qoz. Mahalaxmi Towers. Lawyerpet' Ongole. 213. K,arra Suresh Babu, S/o. K Ramaiah, a-ged abo-ut 56 y.e..qrt Oq: . - 'Employee, Fl/o. C-2, Aarjay Enclave, Beside Amway Office, Hill Top Colony' Enamanzil. Hyderabad - 500082. 214 K Viiava Kumar. S/o. K Kotaiah, aqed about 52 Years, Occ Employee' -' nyo. C/o KSyama Sundar Rao, E2719,Lab Qtrs, Kanchanbagh, Hyd. 215. Marella Rajani Kumari, S/o.Viiaya Kuqqr.gggd.a[out 5! years' Occ -' Employee, R/o. Cio. K Syama Sundar Rao, E2719,Lab Qtrs, Kanchanbagh' Hyderabad - 500 058.

216. P,rligaddaVydehi, W/o. Siva RameKumar, aged 1W$P years,.Occ -' -Housewifel Ryo. 1 -i 0-304/5/8, BrahmanWadi, Begumpet, Hyd. 217. Gullapalli lndu Madhavi, W/o G.-Raq, age.d abqut 39 y9?.'!' 9c9 - "Housewife, iVo. Plot No.85/A, Flat No.G-3, Samskruti Palace, MLA Colony' pe66l frl1r.1 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034.

218. Nirmala Reddy, W/o. S Obula Reddy, aged about 6^5 yearsrOgc . Busines:;, R/o. 910/5, Manasarovar Heights, lVlanovikas Nagar' Secbad. 219. Ch. Uma Rani, W/o. C.N. Kesava Chand, aged about 49 years, Occ Employe,e. PUo.7-1-29121, Flat No.205, Sai Ram Siri Sampada Apts' Leela Na!ar, Ereg-umPet, HYderabad. 89 220 H)rC K Surya Rao, S/o. Late Kowali Venkata Subba Raor aged about 54 , Occ Employee, Rl/o.1 6-'1 1-51 1/D/37, Shalivahana Nagar, Dilsukhnagar, 221- G. Satyanarayana, S/o. Venkata Subbanna, aged aboutTl years, Occ Retd. Employee, Fi/o.6-149/2, Flat No.202, G K P Mbnsions, Saifabad, Hyderabad -5 00 004.

222. Chagarlamudi Krishna, S/o. C Madhusudhan Rao, aged about 49 years, Occ Employee, R/o.Plot No.17, 36-136/28, Defence Colony, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad.

223. Makam Subbarameswara Sefty, S/o. Late M Chavanna Setty, aged about o 64 years, Occ Private Service, R/o. LIG 45, Type-l, Udayanagar Colony, B K Guda,.S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad.

224. Kasulavada Latha, Wo G. Krishna Rao, aged about 39 years, Occ Housewife, No.1O-2-2891120/5, Flat No.301, Laxmi Teja Homes, P S Nagar, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad.

225. Palakolanu Narayana Reddy, S/o. P V Subba Reddy, aged about 76 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No.5-9-22, Flat No.42, Mahesarari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad.

226. Obbineni Ramanjaneva Reddy, S/o.0 Jaya Rama Reddy, aged about 42years, Occ Employee, Ri/o. H.No.5-9-22,Flal No.42, Maheswari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad.

227. Palakolanu Sowbhagyamma, Wo P. Narayana Reddf, aged about 7'l yeae, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No.5-9-22, Flat No.42, Maheswari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad.

228. lsanaka Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o. Venku Reddy, aged about 54 years, Ocr Employee, R/o. H.No.5-9-22,Flat No.42, Maheswari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad.

229. N. Srinivas Chakravarthy, S/o. Late N. Krishna MurthyAged 42yea$, Occ Employee, Ri/o. H.No.48-320 01, Ground Floor Ganesh Nagar, Chintal, R.R. District.

230. K. Sudhir Kumar, S/o. K. Pandu Aged about 62 years, Occ Retd. Employee R/o. H.No.2-2-6 47 17, C.E. Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. 231. Smt. A. Srilatha @. U.Srilatha, Wo. A.S.M. Raju Aged about 42 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 232. Joint Collector-1 , Ranga Reddy District. 233. Nukala Radhika Reddy, Wo. Sridhar Reddy, Aged about 66 years, Occ Housewife, R!/o. 1 - 1, Agapet, Warangal, Telangana State, Rep by her GPA Holder, Kirit Reddy Jaddu, S/o. Jerom Reddy, Aged about 57 years, Occ Business, R/o. 1 - 90/4/'l, Vinayknagar, Madhapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. (R233 tS TMPLEADED AS PER C.O., DT.13/11l2O24VIDE IA.NO. 1/2022 lN cRP.6164/2016)

234. Smt Puligadda Videhi, Wo. P. Siva Rama Kumar, Aged 58 years, Occ Housewife, Ri/o. H.No. 1 - 10 - 3O4l45lB, Line No. 07, Door No. 150, Brahman Wadi, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Rep by GPA Holder, M. Narasimha Rao. 90 (R2341 bnp. o S TMPLEADED AS PER C.O., DT.1,}rII2O24VIDE IA'NO' A2O22IN *i4l2016l P E ,151 of CPC praying..that in the circumstances stated Petition ltnder Section oi'ttr-u p"iitidn,in".Uioh Court mav be pleased in the affidavit fited in ;;; susoend the operation of [i"";J;r'l;t!J-i+.0'si'ro in Case No' F2l5884/2013 iI tEil.;';,hlrloini corrt"tor-1' Ransa Reddv District ' Gounsel for th,c Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN for th,e Respondent Nos'66,67 '121'141'186 &24 SRI A BHARATH KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No'42 : SRI E' ANISHA REDDY for the Respondent Nos'72, 73 & 75: SRI V' VENt'ilADHAV CounselfortheRespondentNos'3to9'11'14to18'20to25'27'?g-lo37:SRl N. Counsel for thre Respondent Nos'89'98'101 : SRI E' Counsel for ttre Respondent Nos'44'46' 48 &51 to 60 : SRI SAURABH n Counsel for ttre Respondent No'202'213 : SRI CHITNENI MOHAN RAO NP N 1 F 3 Petition Under section 91 of A'P (T'A) Tenancy and Agricultural Hq:^l"t' 1950 aggrieved uv tne o'jeriut"i z+'tis'zor6 Passld inCase No' F2118712o14 on the file of ttre Court ot tne Loint Collector-l' Ranga Reddy District'

1. GADDII BALAIAH, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah, Aged about 70 No.1-38, Gachibowli Village, Occ Ma ndal, R/o. H Agricu ll ure, Ranga Reddy District 2. Gadda Cha ndraiah, S/o.Ma 1 , Gachibowli H.No.1-38/ District Gadda Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah, Aged about 53 Agricul ture, Rr/o. H.No.1-29, Gachibowli Village' Ranga Reddy District 'i,illa["1'33-?,H$X%ifi "fu ;'ff,,^ffi?li]'R"Y& Occ Mandal,

4. Khanatnet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah, Gachibowli Village' Agriculture, R/o. H.No.1-58/1' Ranga Reddy District. (Died) about 78 Occ Mandal, 9r

5. Khanamei Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 4a yrs.' 6. Khanamet Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah, aged 44 yxs.' 7. Khanamet Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah, aged 34 yrs., Petitioners 5 to 7 are all Agriculturists R/o H.No.1-35' Gachibowli' Rangareddy District. (Petitioners 5 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased P4 as per b.o., ot.za.t t.2021 in t.A.No. 1 l2o2o.\ ENTI]

1. SMT.SDEEPIKACHAVA, D/o. C. Hanumantha Rao Wo. Sharath Babu, aged about 31 years No.12, Banjara Hills, H.No. 8-2-6841111 12 andllll4, Durga Temple Lane Road Hyderabad -34.

2. Chava China Veerabhadraiah, S/o. late Kotaiah H.No.1-7-1lA, Opp Chaitanya School about 86 R/o.

3. Smt. Chava Hymavathi, W/o. Sri Chava China Veerabhadraiah years Rl/o. H.No.1-7-1lA, Opp Chaitanya School Chaitanyapuri' about 82

4. Chava Srinivas, S/o. Chava Hanumantha Rao Aged about 36 years Ri/o. Plot No.361, Road No.BO Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 96. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division 6. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 7. Authorized Officer, Land Reforms, Collectorate, R.R' District. 8. Station HOuse Officer, Rayadurga Police Station, R.R.District. 9. G. Shankar (Died per LRs), - 10.G. Krishna (Died per Lrs), - 11.Syed Kareem, S/o. Khaia Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village' Si:rilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Distrht.

12.Mohd. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

13.Mohd. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, FUo. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

14.Mohd. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, R/o. GacNbowli Vtllage' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1S.Ahmed. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga re, R/o. Gachibowli District.

16. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah Aged !2 years, Occ Aoriculture Rl/o. H.No.1 -6711, Gachibowli, Serilingamaplly Ranga Reddy District. (Died per LRs R37 to R41)

17.D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babdiah Aged 62 years, H.No.1 -56/1 , Gachibowli Village Serilingamaplly, Ranga Reddy Occ Fl/o istrict

18.Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agriculture,. Rl/o. Gachibowli Village. Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 92 District. '$"rl'isllYS'S'ia

27.G. H.

28.G. H. zs.ffi about 35 Occ ,Gi{souffi 'a,#{e,6"?n,\li,:33, Aoriculture R/o' Ra"nga Reddy District' Occ House wife al Ranga ReddY Distrid:.

34.G. Pra veen, S/o H.No.'l -44,Gachibowli Village, . G. Krishna

35.M/s. 8-57 ,('ffi"F,X."f P,"mP'l;[ttsBtii

36. Joint Collector-1 , neces,sary partles aged 54 Yrs.' ucc: noa ReddY inis cRP) Ra Ho use Wife District. ( M. Suguna about 23 Occ Mandal Aoriculture R/o. Ringa Reddy District' M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R Kamdar FUo- 5- Road, N amPallY, HYd erabad. Nos. 9 to 34 are not /o Late Manikonda Yadaiah,

37.M. Strgu na W/o Late Ma nikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 Yrs'' Occ: House Wife 38. M. Chiranieevi S/o Late Manikond a Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs., Occ: Agriculture 39.M. lrilahesh K Agriculture umar S/o Late Maniko nda Yadaiah, aged 34 Yrs'' Occ: 93

40.M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs., Occ: Agriculture 41.M Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 22 yrs.; on record as LRs of deceased .2025, vide l.A.No.1 of 2025 made . NO: ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an oder restraining respondents herein from alienating or creating third party interest in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 42-24 gts of land in SY. No. 51(Ac.17- 20gts) Sy.no.S2 (Ac. 15-36 gts). Sy.No. 53 part (Ac. 948 gts) situated in Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distric't and pass Gounsel for the Petitioners : SRl. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counse for the Respondent No.35 : MS. E. ANISHA REODY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.18,20 & 25 to 34 : SRI SAURABH RA., Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4 : SRI V VENUMADHAV CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 647e OF 2016: Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 aggrieved by the Order dated 24.09.2016 Passed in Case No. F2119412014 on the file of the Court of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District. '1. Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 Fl/o. H.No.1-38. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally District. years, Occ Agriculture Mandal Ranga Reddy

2. Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.Maisaiah Aged about 60 years, .Occ Agriculture Ri,/o. H.No.1-38/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

3. Gadda Sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda Maisdiah Aged about 53 years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. H.No.1-29, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

4. Khanamet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balai Rl/o. H.No.'l -58/ l , Gachibowli dy District. (Died per LRs) Agriculture Ranga Red about 78 rs, Occ Mandal

5. Khanamet Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah, aged 48 yrs., 6. Khanamet Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah, aged zt4 yrs., 94 T.KhanametMalleshS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged34yrs., Fetitionens 5 to 7 areAgriculturists, Rl/o H'No'1-35' Gachibowli' Rangareddy :J:1[:".* 5 to 7 are brousr{ on record as LRs of the deceased p4 as per b.6:;i:r.i.ir .zoz'r in l.A.No.3 ot 2o2o)

1. K MANM()HAN H.NO. 2-,1-925, AND REDDY, S/o. NimboliAdda PETITIONERS rs Occ Doctor R/o.

2. The Revernue DiVisionalfficer, Raiendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4. Authorize'd Officer, Land Reforms, Collectorate' R'R' District' 5. Station House fficer, Rayadurga Folice Station, R.R. District. 6. G. Shanl:ar (Died Per LRs), - 7. G. Krishrra (Died Per Lrs), - g. Sved Kareem, s/o. Khaja occ Aoriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village .,' 9. Mohd. Ghouse, S/o; late Md. tsmailgeg.np.ngulture, R/o. Gachibowli Village r' 10. Mohd. Yrusuf, s/o. late Md. lsnraitocc-Agriculture, R/o' Gachibowli Village ' "' 11.Mohd. W,azeer, S/o. latel(hasirn Ali occ.Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village' ' ' '5Jii'riigi;p;ll'i ;#iils;;;;iiv-M;d;idnsa deddv District' $riiiris;;Aii Mandal Ranga Reddv District' 3 Jti'riig;ildily-Mandal Ranga Rbddv District' Mandal Ranga.*oo, District' '- Vil6's; Seri|fi#mpiiti Manoal Ranga Reddv District' 12.Ahmed..Wazeer,S/o.lateKh3qiryAlioccAgrigylture,R/o.Gachibowlt 13. Manikonda Yadaiah, s/o.Iate lvtanikonda Kondaiah Aged * y"^ ' "' nJii"r[."" nyo. Ti]f.i61ii t i: Gachibowl i, S erilinga m a pl lv Ra ns a rs, Occ Reddy District. ,iDied per LRs)

14.D.Gandaiah, s/o. late DqgpalliBabdiah Aged.62^years' occ Agriculture Rl/o' H . N o. 1 -ti6/1, c;;hiH*liVilEd Seritingam-aplly, R-a nsa Red d v D i stri ct

15. Mr. Bab;aiah, S/o. late Bala Linqaiah.occ Agriculture,' R/o' Gachibowli Village' ' "' 5 lii-r i ildri* pitiv Mand al Ranga-Red d y D istrict' R/o G a c h i b o w r i V i r r a s e u ' B g,.?,fi U:,*B; i fi,'i,,?fi F"iHSfi LT fJf.itJ$l',:1*'

18.Gadda

17.Smt. Santamma, wo. @e Balaiah.Qcc-fgr.rculture' R/o' Gachibowli Village ' ' S"iiiifi;'itp;iiiMandal Ranga Reddv District' '" vil'i;6;, satilsa,Tipittv Manoal Ranga Reddy District. lg.Gadda l\arsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah occ_Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli '" vill;G, S"rtiingirnpatiy Mandal Ranga Reddy District. ./ettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Qcc.{o1c.ulture, RJo. Gachibowli . r.'-l'.a-'j':: 9s

23.G. Suresh, S/o. G' Shankar4g".9 abot{ 3p..Vea9'-Oct Aoriculture R/o' H.No.2-62 ruBt A,Gachibowti Viila;;3J,iriiginbdiv Mindal Ransa Reddv District. ,0fi :*'Xl,i[S]tri,Bil;-:vfi |63:3ttfl fi$,?|$ifi ,'fi Ifi 35'3"fn]nff.xlYB,Y'ia ffi;}rqL,cr'[T3#B',r,r,",.

25.G.Prakqs.h,r.s/o. G' Shankar ngSd about 35 vears' H. No. 1 -44, c rJr,iSo*iiVirrig"'Serilingampally Mar 26.smt..G. FuFheela' w/o' G'..Krishna Aged about oq R/o. H. No. r -++]'6',tnioo*ri Vi t tag e' Slrilingam pa ll1 District. lfi,ffii,3'fii13:"RJ[1",

27.G.saqje.ey1s/o' G' Krishna Aged about 32've3p'.'3rT$flt?'[Efofl3i.tri"t. ''' H : ul: i'44 ; G ;;tio6*r ivi i t' g e, 5 e ri I i ns a m pa I I v M a t ,ufi i';'R:'#:Hsx'J'f #"?;,"i L,;::f,itxt?JS-f "[,ETt3sf,S3L"#,innl3fi 2eG.J8HSiffi ,?,,i1'i"JE"tfl,iJ,ffix,tf In#e5'3"?"r1'#SyBYfa**"',-

30.G. Nave91, s/o. G. Kriglrp. Ased about 25 vegrs-'*3"tftX"#yp#."t H. No. 1 - 1 4+, c"r"6i'oo*ii Vi[ag"e' S eri li ngampally M District.

31.G. Pra.vqqn,^S/o. G. K1ielr.1a nggd about 23 v.gal?'r$:!Ag[3:'tHt?ffor,ru,",. H. No. 1 -44, e'J Jn ii'o*r i Vittig" Iserilingam pally Ma

32.M/s.KastopaCorporatio!'R9P:byitsM'D'S-4AnilKumarRKamdarR/o'5- i{oii' N ampal lv' Hvderabad' 8-57,To p Ftoo"i ii;#i H;i j L -stlii" " necessary Parties ln tnls uKr''

33.JointCollector-1,Bal.g.aEg{qvDistrict.(respondentNos.6to3larenot 34.M. Suguna W/o Late Manikona Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs'' 35'M.ChiranjeeviS/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged40yrs.'

36.M.MaheshKumar,S/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged34yrs., 37.M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs'' 33.M.PravallikaD/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged22yrs. AllareF/oH.No.l.STt6ll,StreetNo.3.Serilingampally,Gachibowli, RangareddY District' [$# t". i3,trt ili x9i L? I d;s: l'tr] ft: :.'.']s sfts?3i' R 1 3 a s p e r c o RESPONDENTS 96 I '6;'it+O gEl.''S-y.NL.. PetitionunderSectionl5lcPcpraylng.llatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit firecr in support o{ thg BltitiJo, ine'High corrt may be preased to pass an order restraining responde"t" h;r"i" from irienating or creating third party interest in respe,ci oi Und admeasuringlA"' 4??4 gts of land in SY' No' 51(Ac'17- pitt (n"' e-08 gts) situated in 20sts) Sy.no.SlZ G ach ibowl i Vil.a geJ i"t*ing-q*fi*-y .tl'"o"l Ranga Redd v District' Counsel for ther Petitioners : SRI. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY counsel for thtl Respondent No'32 : MS' d Rt'ttSHn REDDY -se PetitionUndersectionglof,A.Po.A)T.elancyandAgriculturalLandsAot' 1950 aggrievect OVin"-Oa"rOX"O-Z+'OIg'ZOf 6 Passed in Cise No' F2l19512014 on the fite of tn,, ciuilot-tn"-iOint collector-I, Ranga Reddv District' - -'; Between: &Ttsl,' fir,'ffi h":ff t??,t " X*Z:n, *AH' fi Xi" if r,, 8A3fl f, District. zEiSS:f n6ooY District. "Sil?,?S", #f ",',;SL.',*yf i,-?,',?!#31ft i"iT,.?3,1i"'fu P,ii'Hffi U["fi "Y& 3. G. Sukfiaiah, S/o. Gadda.Maisaiah.Aged abo.ut 53 years' occ Agriculture Fl/o. H.No.1-2e, GachibowliViffag!]t?riiil'g;rprltv Manoat Ranga Reddv District' -Virrud", seririgampaitv Mandal 4.KhananretShivaiah,..S/9.-!ftanamet..BalaiahAqedaboutTBVears.Occ Aoricurrure Fyo. H.No_gsfi|'6iJriiuiilii Ringa Reddy District' (L'leo)

5.KhanarnetBikshapathis/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged48yrs.' 6.KhanarnetKumarS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged44yrs.' T.KhanarnetMallesh,S/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged34yrs.' Petitiorrers5toTare.Agriculturists,F/oH.No.1-35,Gachibowli,Rangareddy District. (Petitioners5to.Tare.b.royghtonrecordasLRsofthedeceasedP4asper 8 6.,Iri.Io-ir Soziin t.A.t'15.s or 2o2o) PETITIONERS AND I.MUSHARANI,W{q..!4.-SivaPrasad4geo42vears,occSoftwareEngineer R/o. H.No. o-e-t 26t6}5,nliEfiii"'riL';; n"l Bnuuun Road, Hvderabad'

2.TheRevenue-DivisionalOfficer,RajendranagarDivision 3. Dy. Cr>llector & Tahsildar' Serilingampally N/landal 97

4.Authorizedfficer,LandReforms,Colbctorate,R.R.District.

5.StationHouseffi@r,RayadurgaPoliceStation,R.R.District. 6. G. Shankar (Died Per [-Rs), 7. G. Krishna (Died Per Lrs), 8.SyedKareem,,.f'S?t"f"?"rltffSy6,'.fl &.nachibowriVilrase' 9. Mohd. Ghouse' S/o. late lvld. lsmai!pcc.Ap.ngulture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, v' 10.Mohd. Yousuf, s/o. late Md. lsmailocc-Agriculture, R/o' Gachibowli Village' ' "' $;liis;paliv Minoit Ransa Reddv District' 5 Jtiiiiigffip;ilv-Gndal Ransa Reddv Distr'tct' Si;rilingamPal[

11.Mohd.Wazeer,S/o.lateKhasimAlipqg.{qrlgulture,R/o.GachibowtiVillage' ' ''55riii?ig;;p;1ry ffind;] Ranga Reddv District' 12.Ahmed wazeer, s/o. latqKhasim Al!oggAgriculture' Rl/o' Gachibowlivillage' ''' $;iiil;;;"fi lt'M;noit Ranga Reddv District' 13.Maniko. nda Yadaiah, s/o' !-atg Manikonda Kqndaiah '"'IJrilritri" nyt] i. ruo.i:0711, Gachibowli, seriling, *t?1rte]fr6:th3f3, tjistrict. (Died Per LRs) " ,oE:,f"li9u?fl18l";n',il&ff 1rft Be'X*Hft lt"Af$'r:'*Hffi .'"?".inJi:,*|I**" 15. Mr. Babaiah, s/o. late Bala Lingaiah-occ Agriculture' RL/o' Gachibowli Village' ' " 5 riii 6, *pirrtj tianoat Ranga-Reddy District' 16.Swamy, S/o. lateBala !-rlgaiah Oe9.A9lc.u!ture' Rl/o' GachibowliVillage' ' " 5"iliin6'ampaifi tt tandd Rlnga Reddy District' 17.Smt. Santamma, Wo.. lale Balaiah occ-|gqrculture, RI/o. Gachibowli Village, "' S lS.GaddaYettaiah,S/o.GaddaVeeraiaho_*lg'llt,lture,R/o.Gachibowli ''' Vifi;;;,'S;;iiffii,iliittv tt'tinoal Ransa Reddv District 1 9. Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaian .Qcc^flgriculture, ' "' Vi.'ii;;;, a;'{iili,;6Aiv utinoat Ransa Reddv District 20.MadigaPentaiah,slq.!q!"Ve-eraiah.occAgriculture,Rl/o.GachibowliVillage' ri ii n-& tiiiii iv-ivtand al Ranga Red d v District' RJo. G achibowti " Serilingampify UtanOal Ranga Reddy District'

21.Smt.G.Laxmamma,Wo..B.Shankar4-g"dabout60years,occHousewife R/o. H. No .1 -44,Gachibowti vid;;, 6.;rir;g"rpaliv tv!'andal Ra nsa Reddv District. H . No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village,'EZiffi;ft p;flv rvr iho' t Rins a Reddv D istrict' ; 3"lirffi"i5}til?fl? *"0 0,

22.G.Darshan,S/o.G.S!r31|arAgedabout4l.years,occAgricultureR/o. 23 . G .s u r eg!,.-s/o. G' s-!raq\g r Aged about 3e -v"" o - " H. r.ro 2-- aitii is dq, Gidtr iuowtl Vi I lag e' S e ril i n g a n District. ,0g.,fJl"_i[s"Tifiil;,pvfi ]3::3ttffi3"ffiifr ,.[,1i3:13"&]'Jt"Jltx',S's,h 98

25.G. Prakqs.h,^s/o' G' strg$at Aq.ed about 35 v''eqp' fff#;L?'&T3#Bit n". H. No. 1 _44, e aJni66iii*iribe, 26.Smt. G. S'usheela, wo. G..Krishna Age( about 45 years, occ House wife R/o. H. No. 1 -44: 8;iiiddili viHs;,' iz rili nd;baitv uano al' Ra nsa Reddv District. -serilinsa mpally Mar ,? fi:fjl,i?ii?i"'Jf,.?-ffi,:lll$jg?*,*n"iil'3'",1'r"ffi3,T*flt?"[E',ffiistrict ,ufi T,:::olig?n?J3,a?vi[["ggttflf,S3H;5ffi 3I';'RH[',"H""#$"#?;" 29.G. Jaipal' S/o. G' Krishna 4.g"d about 27 yeqq'-Occ Aqriculture R/o' H'No'1- 44, Gach,ibowri vilage, seriringafriJriv rr11ino.t'Ranga Redd y District' H . N o. 1 _4 4, C altri-uowrivinigel se rili ng ampal ly Ma

30. G. Naye91, !/o. G' Kri.qtlna Asei about 25 vears" 3ff'ttil"JitHS#roo*r,". 31 . G. Prave'en, s/o. G' Krig!.9a Ased about 23 v'9qry'S:! 43ffi:"Hl?Woo*u.. " ''il:No: -44, ,rlyf;,y"11"p,3"?ffi,{gl116[ir6gilTS},lii#'J,5}iff [5eT5"R/o5- 'G;;hi5,i'iti Vittib"Jseritingampallv Ma #'*s31f"o3[,]'#?fl.3 EagilBistric. 34.M. Suguna W/o Late Mankona Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs" 35.M.ChiranieeviSloLateN|anikondaYadaiah,aged40yrs., (Respondent Nos 6 to 31 are not

36.M.MahelshKur'nar,S/gLateManikondaYadaiah,aged34yrs.' 3T.M.SrikanthS/sLatelvlanikondaYadaiah'aged35yrs''

33.M.PravallikaD/oLateManikondaYadaiah'aged22yts' AllareFUoH.No.l-STl6tl.StreetNo.3.Serilingampally,Gachibowli, RangareddY District' sT# s i,3,?'i x lt 3:i:f I dt 3iloffi ,' ft'" :."'3s S'% ? 3 i' R 1 3 a s p e r c o RESPONDENTS I.A. NO:1 o,F 281 MP. NOI 8s30! oF 20 16) petitiorr under seetion 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affida.vit filed in support of the petition, ihJHign Court may be pleased to pass an order restraining respondents r,erein'from irienating or creating third party interest in ,."rpl"i of' the t-anO admeasuring Ac'42-24 grs of land in -sy.No.53 part (Ac.e-08 gts) sV r'r1sz1i;.15-56 gts)' sy.No.S1(Ac.1Z-Z6gi"l, . situated in Gerchibowti Vittage, Serilinlamaplly-Mandal' Ranga Reddy District' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for llhe Respondent No'32 : MS' E ANISH REDDY ..a,.,- 2..., '!: < )'i;. a* lttat::.::i 99 PetitionUrrdersectionglofAP.o.A)TelancyandAgricltl,'{LandsAct, 1e50 aggrieved by the met$F9'i+,ag.i616 Passed in Case No' F2195412o16 on the file of tfre C6urioflft.loint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District' Between: --;H,1*anAh-*;"d?;ffi 2fi District. i$s:?3!ftloE53,i,3li;ll"ffi :T":e.?ffi :h"'"'Yf 'ffi ;;?3? District. Vfi;Sff 'Se,,ifl &ffi :,lroil??,t;,"fi :,+T.-*H; Aoriculture Ri/o. {anga Reddy "d*ft

3. Gadda sukkaiah, s/o. Gadda.Maisaiah Ag..gd about 53 vears' occ Agriculture R/o. H. No. r -zdl"dl"*r'i66iti-'iii6;, Sbiiiingi,pally Mandal Ra ngb Reddv District. 4.KhanametShivaiah,s/o.-t(|raqametBalaiah..AgedaboutTSyears,occ Aoricutture Ryo. H.ilo.1-ss/1, &d[ioJ*iiVlrug6, Serilingampallv trlandal iilnd ctdov Distria. (oied Per LRs)

5.KhanametBikshapathis/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged4Syrs.' 6.KhanametKumarS/oLateKhanametShivaiah'aged44yrs., T.KhanametMalleshS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged34yrs.' Petitioners 5 to 7 are Agriculturists, Fl/o H'No'1-35' Gachibowli' Rangareddy District. (Petitior,rers 5 to 7 arc bro-ug$ on rccord as LRs of the deceased P4 as per b.o::';i.rA. {'t -zozt in l.A.No.3 or 2o2o\ .. PETITIONERS AND 56iili"gJ,ibatry Manoal Ranga Reddv District' r ' I.SMTPSANDHYARANI.W/o.SekaT.VR/o.GabhibowliVillage, 2. The Revenue Divisional officer, Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal 4.Authorizedofficer,LandReforms,Collectorate,R.R.District.

5.StationHouseOffi@r,RayadurgaPoliceStation,R.R,District, 6. G. Shankar (Died Per LRs), - 7. G. Krishna (Died Per Lrs), - B.SyedKareem,S/o.KhaiaOccAqriculture,R/o.GachibowliVillage Sbrilingamp"iiv-ftnindiinJnganleoovDistrict g.Mohd.Ghouse,S/o.latejvld.lsmailocc.Agligulture,Fl/o.GachitrowliVillage Seriiingamparfy MinOal Ranga Reddy District'

10.Mohd. Yousuf, s/o. late Md. lsmailocc Agriculture' RJo' Gachibowli Village ' -' 5 erii ingu * paity-nlinOal Ranga Reddy D istrict' 100

11.Mohd. wazeer, s/o. latef(hasim A!9qg, griculture, R/o' Gachibowli Village' ' "SJtiiiiig;';p;lii Mandal Ranga Reddv District' 12.Ahmed. \Mazeer, S/o. late Khgqigr Ali occ {gri1t1ltyp, Rl/o. Gachibow|i ' -' vit6'G; i;Lrili ngim patty rr/la nd at Ranga Reddy District, Distrid. (Died Per LRs) "X5#[?.i,'13x,10fl"ft b.','%Jif AH]iit""lf l?53]ff 3$*gpifl f"ffi R"8ff 1 4. D.G andrriah, s/o. late Dar.apall i B abd iah Aged., 62-ye'ar-s' pec Ao3eyltgre R/o' '*' il:uXi i6ii :'d;;hii*ti Vii[age seritii',gamiptty, dansa.Reddv District. 15. Mr. Babzriah, S/o. late Bala Ling:riah.Ogg Agriculture,' R/o' Gachibowli Village' ' -' 5;ii-i6; mpitiv Ma nd al Ra ngaReddy District' 16.Swamy, S/o. late Bala L119aiah,o".".ngI"1rlture, Rl/o. Gachibowlivillage ' "' $tilillL tnpaitl. tr,ta ndal RI nga Reddy District' 17.Smt. sarrtamma, w/o. late Balaian.g"$glculture, R/o' Gachibowli village "'SiiiiiiG,irpiitf Mandal Ransa Reddv District' 18.Gadda Yettaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Q""Aglqultgre, R/o' Gachibowli ' "' viii;;;, seirini'impailv N4andaI Ranga Reddy District. lg.Gadda l,larsimha, s/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah.occ_Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli ' "' viii;6;,' ieriiingi, parry rvra ndat Ranga Reddy District. 20. Madiga Pentaiah, slq !q!" veeraiah.occ Agriculture, Rl/o'' Gachibowli vilfage' --'setilifigampaily Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 21.Smt. G. Laxmamma, w/9,. B. Shankar Aged about 60 vears' occ Housewife H.No.1-44, Gachibowti Vinage, suiiiingrilpaiti uanoai Ranga Reddy District.

22.G.Darshan, Slo. G. Shankar Aqed about 41 years' Occagricu[ur'g,R/o' H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, "sLiitingampaliy Mandal Rahga Reddy Dstrict'

23.G.Suresh,S/o.G.Shankar49"dabout39..years,o.9t$griqtlfqpRl/o. H. No.2-62 nd t zi,' 6;;hiil*rivirrase, serilihsamfally Mandal Ranga Reddv District. z4.G.Shiva Kumar, S/o. G._shankar Aged about 31 yeqry,_occ Agriculture Rl/o. H.No.1.44, Gachibowli Village, S"tif"ingarpally Mandal RangaReddy District' ,ufi n[.l1lfilo'jh3";l]ilHf%*,ft 335],""1[iffi?5is"tffi rhTffi ,t,i"t

26.Smt. G Susheela, W/o. G. Krishna {g"9. about 19 yg9o,.Qq House wife R/o. H.ruo.r-+"+I'6'r"'niOo*fi Virfrge, S"erilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District

27.G.Sanieeva, S/o- G. Krishna Aged about 32.ye-ars, occ Agriculture R/o' H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Seiilingampal[y Mandal Ranga Reddy District' fi []R:'"!3H3x'1"'#"?;," "iR::-r'-i'3X1i',,J3;f "f,',iTttHfi,fn3h"#jr,y'g^ffi 29.G.Jaip,al, S/o. G. Krishna Aged abou.t 27.years,pcc Agriculturs.ryg. H.No.1- --'ii,-G:;cr,iOoi,iiViriiige, Setifngampally tt{andal Ranga Reddy District' :.r. :-c;atu!;iti-I::.--':i:,;:!ix::r.l:ii:'ii-'i: 101 '03.o[1]-",?,%hf; #tri\ffi "$ffi Hlffi ffif'*sifr:?tYF"ffi"'

31.G.Praveen'S/o.G.K59|r.JraAgedabout23years,occAoricultureFl/o. District. H. No. 1 -44, caCtrioowti Milage, sffii'nl;ffidrrv rt t:inoat R5nga Reddv District' 32.M/s.KastopaCorporatlqq,Fgp:.qyitsM'D'SriAnilKumarRKamdarFl/o'5- B-sT,roprrooili6*lili"tiaiJl"sirltfi i{oai'r'tampallv'Hvderabad' Districl (respondent Nos' 6 to 31 are not *3'S$:'f$3[il'.Htfl€ ERtrY 34.M. Suguna w/O Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs'' 35.M.ChiranieeviS/oLateManikondaYadaiah'aged40yrs'' 36.M. Mahesh Kumar, s/ M. Suguna wo Late Manikona Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs'' 37. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs'' 3g.M. pravallika D/o Late Manikond.a Yadaiah' aged 22yrs' AllareFl/oH.No.1-STl6tl,StreetNo.3.Serilingampally,Gachibowli, RangareddY District' ffi Tfi l"ri3,x''tlfr s:1':fl idEs:ftrJft: :J# S'"i8 ?3i' R 1 3 as pe r c o RESPONDENTS NO OF F 6 PetitionunderSectionlslCPcpraying.thatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petitijn, injHign Court may be pleased to pass an order restraining respondent, n"i"in'from irienating or creating third party interest in respect ol land admeasuri"g A" 42-?4gts of land in SY' No' 51(Ac'17- p;l (Ac' 9-08 gts) situated in 20gts) Sy.no.S2 C". G{6 gtsl' G ach i bowt i Vi ttagel S-"tif ingr*pl"f f i Vt"nd al, Ra n ga Red d v D i st ri ct' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No'32: SRI E' ANISHA REDDY '-yNo -ss f t02 PetitionL|ndersectionglofAP(I.1ll^eTlncyan!{oricut$ratLandsAct, 1950 aggrieved OV in" OOul grl"^d iq.Og.ZOt6. Pasied in Case No'F2/55712014 on thefile of tne cJurt or g," Joint collector-;, Ranga Reddy District- Be-fifr€eh: -l&;*,,1'jill'.,1r:3,3^i33fl ;'$li3Lt'33#"!:fi$"1'9'fr 3ft .ffi fiTH'JI; fistrict. 2. Gadda chandraiah, S/o..lla.isaiah Aged.about 60 years' obc Agriculture Rl/o' H.Noi1-3g/1, Gachibowti virrale,=5"r1ingi*prtly Mhndal Ranga Reddy District. -s

3. c . M a i sa i a h As ed u!kg(a!, s/o, G ad d a "o'"t -T,lo"#R#fi Ag[:ilt8l&#f H.No.1 -29, <i#tino*il vittage' Seritinlampally N Balaiah., Aoed about 78 years' occ Aoricurture, R/o H.No 1-s8/11'6l""niuo*ri Viri"d;seriting-ampaity Mindar, R6nSia ReddY District

4. l(hanamet Shivaiah, s/9 -Ilanamet .

5. Khanam,at Bikshapathi, S/o. Late Khanmet Shivaiah, aged 48 yrs' 6.Khanam.etKumar,S/o.LateKhanmetShivaiah,agedz+4yrs. T.KhanametMallesh'S/o.LateKhanmetShivaiahmaged,34yl,rs, All are lrgricutturists, R/o H No. 1-35, Gaehibowli, Ranga Reddy Eistrict' Petitionerrs Nos.5 to 7 are^brought on record^qs LRsof the deceased p4 as p"r'drri"io"t'iii"i iq-t1'zoz1 in-I'A'No '3 of 2o2o ...Petitioners/Respondent Nos'l,3,5 & 6 AND

1. Yadas Ir[allamma, W/o Late fvlaisaiah, Aged 56 vears R/o. H.No.1-55' Gachibowli (v ), S he rl i ns a m p'li; ( M )-iln6i neOOV District' Gachibowti (v ), S h e rl i n s a m p ri iv ir'r l-cbnfia Reddy District.

2.Yadasllarsamma'D/oLatetVlaisaia!.Age{a5vearsR/o.H.No.1-55,, 3. Yadas l(umar, S/o Late lr/aisaiah, ng"{19 ygars,Fl/o. H.No.l-sa Gachibowli v' 4. yadas pochaiah. Sio Lare trlaisaiahjged 3^8 years R/g. ttNo'1-55, (Ut Shlrrlindihpirrv (tvl) Ranga Reddy District' Gachib'wri' tV i 5 nl i i ns, * p a iry ( vt ) Ra-nga Reitdy District'

5.YadaslSrinivas,S/oLatet\Iaisaiah'{geO36^yearsRi/o'H'No'1-55' Gachib,cwr i' iVi' 5nL rrinsa m p i 1 v ( vt ) Ri nga Reddv District' t0lsnJtringi*pittv (tr/l) Ranga Reddv District' v' 6.YadasUrmila,D/o.La.teMaisaiah,4e"{?9yq"'SRl/o.H.No.1.55,Gachibowli 7. yadas Ravinder, S/o Late tVtaisaiah,Aged ry y9?rs^ry.oj H'No'1-55' Gachi b owt i' iv ), b h";t i ng a m pi I ly ( M ) Ra.-n ga Reddy District. B.GaddaShankar,S/o..tVlaisaiah,occAgricultureR/o.H.No.1-3811,G.achibowli ii ;; ; ;pa r i v rr"rino a i Ra nsa Reddv District' Vil I age, s "1i 103

9. Gadda Krishna, S/o. Maisaiah, Ooc Agriculture R/o' H.No.1€8/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1O.Srred Kareem, S/o. lftaja, Occ Agriculture Fl/o. Gachibowli Village, Sarilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 1 1 . Mohd. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculturc, Ri/o. Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

12.Mohd. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy R/o. Gachibowli Mllage,

13.Mohd. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, R!/o. Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga. Reddy District.

14.Ahmed. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. l5.Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah Aged 52 years' O99 Aoriculture. FUo. H.No.1 -67l1 Gachibowli, Serilingamaplly, Ranga Reddy District. (Died per LRs ) l6.Darlaoalli Gandaiah. S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged 62 years, Occ Agriculture, F/o. H.No.'l -56/1 Gachibowli Village, Serilingamaplly, Ranga Reddy District. 1 7. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

18.Swamy, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Occ Reddy riculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village,

19.Smt. Shantamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ Agriculture, R/ o. Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

20.Gadda Yeftaiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 21 .Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.Madiqa Pentaiah. S/o. late Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village Seriliigampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

23.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, R.R- Distrit. Hyderabad.

24.The MRO, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District.

25.The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District.

26.The Jt. Sub-Registrar, Ranga Reddy District.

27.The Jt. Sub-Registrar, Ranga Reddy District. 28.The Station House Officer, Chanda Nagar P.S. Ranga Reddy District. 29.Smt. N. Sabha Rani, Wo. N. Viiaya Kumar Aged 45 years' Occ House wife Ri/o. Plot No.40, Telecom Nagai Gachibowli, R.R. District.

30.V. Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Satyanarayana Aged 53 years, Occ Business Rl/o' 119, SRT, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. 104 HYderabad. 31 . Lakshman Prasad, S/o' Satyanarayana R/o' 12-136:461'St'No:1 Tamaka' SZ.Surender, S/o- B' Narayana'Fi/o'62l4 RT' Bakatpura Hyderabad ;;.y:SJ.ffI r,SBt,:l"-W.:A?:Ased about 53 vears' occBusiness R/o' 34.V. Udayini, Wo. V. Sudhakar R/o' 8-3-315/9A' MaruthinagarYousufguda' "*:ilia;;l;;a. gs.Joint cottactor-1 , Ranga Reddy District. (Resporrdent Nos .8lo'22 and 29 to "-'5fi-nz not necessary parties iri this cRP) Agriculture. 36:M. Suguna W/o. Late Manikonda Yadalah' Aged' 54 Years' Occ: House Wife' 37.M.Chiran|eevi,S/o.LateManikondayadaiah,Aged.40Years,occ: 38.M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o. Late Manikonda yadaiah, Aged. 34 Years, oc,: 39.M. Srika'rth, S/o' Late Manikonda yadaiah' Aged' 35 Years' Occ: Agriculture' 40.M. Pravallika' D/o. Late Manikonda yadaiah, Aged' 22 Years' Agriculture. on re@rd as LRs aiah* as in CRP. No.06 of 2017. of deceased Court Orderdated. Nos. 36 to 40 No .15 i.e., "Ma 06. 0.2025, vide l.A.No.1 of are brought nikonda Yad 2025 made 2017 P. NO :8OF 1 Petitiorunderorder3gRulel&2R/wSectionl5lofCPCprayingthatin the circumstances stated irlin"-lttiorrn filed in supoort of the petition, the High court may be pteased ,"';;;.";;;rder restrainino resoondents herein from or iand admeasuring Ac' 42-24 alienating or oreating tni'o'p;iilnil'"liln 'utp""t ots of land ir sY- No'st(ic'i; id;i+'sv t'1"' .sz 1n"'ts'so sts)' sv'No' 53 part (ac.s-oa gts) situated i" citnit"*ii vitragL serilingimpally Mindal' Ranga Reddv District. Counsel forthe Petitioner :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN Counset for the Respondent No'34 : SRI A 105 PetitionUndersectionglofA.P(T.A)T-elancyandAgric{luqLandsAct, 1950 aggrieved Uv tn" Oro"t 9r1"! iq.Og.Zdt6 Passed in Case No' F2l55112O14 on the file of the c6rrt otlne Joint collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. -::f; Between:

2. Gadda chandraiah, s/o !-vlaisaiah Rai?'.*,%?fi B3*?Vft EeES?f,,9r?i#Hl,lrot?xEa1fi '03'"*H; ,f District. ! Aged about 60 years' 'occ Agriculture R/o' H.No.1-38/1, Gachibowli Village,"dJ,ifiig'i"pitiy- Mhndal Ranga Reddv 3. Gadda sukkaiah, S/o. Gadda.Maisaia[Ag..ed about 53 vears' occ Aoriculture F/o. H.No .1 -2s, Gachibowli vitl;6;, slri=iingimparf- lfina;l District' - . . ,- -,^ r,r-^^6m6r Flqraiah A 4.KhanametShivaiah,s/o.^KhanametBalaiahAoedabout.TSye VittdgE' )ars, Occ ser*insampdrrv Mandar -Rang! District. Reddv - , , Hflll,H'"i#ffi;j}",;iid fA:iltt'ii

5. Khanamet Bikshapath S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah, aged 48 yrs.' 6:KhanametKumarS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged44yrs.' T.KhanametMalleshS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,agd34yr,s., Petitioners5toTareAgriculturists,R/oH'No'1-35'Gachibowli'Rangareddy District. .. rpetitioners 5 to 7 are brougr! on record as LRs of the deceased P4 as per b.cj::'tri'.zi.lt-iozt in r A No 3 ot 2o2o1 PETITIONERS AND 1 . chava Paka sh Ra o, S /o L-qJg, I u bbqi{, Qep$-"03'iit":h1:?Rf!E E?-$;r" EmoloveeFy;.H-N;a-z-atottlB/A6SriSaiMan Hiili, HYderabad

2. The Revenue Divisional officer, Rajendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar' Serilingampally Mandal 4.Authorizedofficer,LanclReforms,Collectorate,R.R.District.

5.StationHouseofficer,RayadurgaPoliceStation,R.R.Diskict. 6. G. Shankar (Died Per LRs)' - 7. G.Krishna (Died Per Lrs)' - S.SyedKareem,S-/9Kl.'qjlocc-Aqriculture,Rl/o.Gachibowli.Village S e ri I i n g a m p; i i v"t\i'; ; J' t' R tn g' n-"eo o v D i stri ct'

9. Mohd. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail occ.A9.n9ulture, Rl/o' GachibowliViltage Serilingampaffy MinOat Ranga Reddy District' i ,J 106 i R/o' Gachibowli Village ^grlculture, 1o.Mohd. Yousuf, s/o, late Md. lsmail 9|cc ' "' SJtiiiigli;dii G.dal Ranga Reddv District' 11.Mohd. W:tzeer, S/o. late Khasim Al! 9*.4q'iculture, Ryo. Gachibowli Village' ' ''SJtiiiiigl;iltaili Mindal Ransa Reddv District' ,t2.Ahmed. vvazeer, s/o. late Kh3gigr Aliocc Agricultule, Fl/o' Gachibowli ''' ?ililb; S eri|fi G;bii tv Ma no al Ranga Reddv D-istrict' "X3#S,t:5r11fl:ft b:,':dJii:S#n18"1fl?53[ff fl'X*??fl f"ffi R"?S; District. ('Died Per LRs) Sl'rii-i ;;;m pi nv rvla no al RangaReddy District'

14.D.Gandaiah,S/o.lateQqgpalliBabdianAgeq.62^years,occAgricultureR/o. H.No. 1 -56/1, d;hi6;*li til6d Seritingamiplly, Ranga Reddy District' 15.Mr.Babaiah,S/o.lateBalaLingaiah.OqqAgriculture''Fl/o'GachibowliVillage' ' "' 16.Swamv, S/o. late Bala LDgaiah Occ.AO3qr$qre' R/o' GachihowliVillage '"'5;;1il6;;a;iv Manoat RSnsa Reddv District' 17.smt. santamma, w/o. late Bala!-ah occ^$glculture, R/o' Gachibowli village '''S"iiiiffitirp;iiiMrndal Ranga Reddv District' lg.Gadda Y'ettaiah, s/o. Gadda veeraiah Qcc.{orlc.ulture, R/o' Gachibowli ' "' viii;d;, is.iiiriigi*pinv rraanoal Ransa Reddy District. lg.Gadda l.larsimha, s/o. Gadda Lakshmalehocc^Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli ' "' 20.Madiga Pentaiah, S/o. late Veerffah.Ocg Agriculture' R/o' Gachibowli Village' -" V';ii;; ;,'ilriiin'g ;, p',-tiv tvtino at Ra nsa Reddv District' $ril'figermpati/ tvtandal Ranga Reddy Distr'ict'

21.Smt.G.Laxmamrna,W./9.'B.ShankarAged?bgYt60vears,occHousewife H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, i?iiiingri1paity Mandai Ranga Reddy District'

22.G.Darshan,S/o.G.ShankarAgedabout4l.years,Occagricu|lurg.RJo. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Viilage, Seritild*paliy Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

23.G.Suresh,S/o.G.ShankarAq"daboq!39..years'O'ctAgricultureR/o' H. No. 2-62 nd tii,' #;hi#;tivtt"E;, Seritiirsampally Mand al Ransa Redd v District. ,of .nijl,.i[ET,r3i?,Pvfi X3:*3'"iffi$"??ii'1r'f

25.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 yeqp' Occ Agriculture R/o' '#e5'3i&]'il5JlYB,S'ia H.No.1..44, Gachibowli Village,'S-*ii"gi;rba1y UahOat Rahga Reddy District'

26.Smt.GSusheela,W/o.G...Krishna{g",g.about45vears,occHousewife R/o. H.r\o.r_+i]'6r"ni-0"*riviliigl;,'siriringampally Mandal Ranga Reddv District

27.G.Sanieeva,S/o.G.KrishnaAgedabout32.years,occAgricultureR/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli V1tage, Biif'ng-ampat6y Mahdat Ranga Reddy District'

28. Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29-years, oct Housewife R/o' H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Viilage, SeElingi*patiy Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

29.G.Jaip.al,S/o.G.Krishna4.9"dabout27years,;pccAgricultureRi/o.H.No.1- 44, G a ch i boi,i i Vif i ug-"' S" tifYn-g a mpal ly Mi nd at Ranga Redd y Di strict' .. --"n: j:='?:Effi xr*iffi r! :-lr 107

30.G. Nanreen, H.No.1-144 District. %?;f; ,,5ffi ,\?ft *%:i3h:Hl3*ffi fi fr*,T,lift:,HyH"fr"' " iio ai, t'l m pal ly' Hyd erabad' B -st,ro p 51oo iI i{""*i'i"rioi,li

31.G. pravegn,^S/o. G. Kriglr1a Asgd about 23 vga-q, ffiffiffifflfrflrou*nct "'' H :Nd I -44,'d;hitriiti' VNrg e Iserit i nga rnpally Mandal Ranga r€oov 32.M/s.KastopaCorporatioq,Rgo..bvitsM.D.SriAnilKtrmarR}(amdarR/o.5- -S tiii. " 33.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' (respondentNos.6to3larenotnecessarypartiesinthiscRP). 34.M. Suguna S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 40 yrs" 35.M.ChiranjeeviW/o Late Manikona Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs" 36.M.MaheshKumarLateManikondaYadaiah,aged34yrs.' 37.M. Srikanth S/o Late lr/anikonda Yadaiah' agd 35 yrs" 38.M. Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22yrs' AllareR/oH.No.l.STt6tl,StreetNo.3.Serilingampally,Gactribowli, ii ngar"ddY District (RR34to38arebrought91-rggordasLRsoJ.tl'e.deggep"dRl3asperC.o at.ra.z.zo2s i; ii il"li'ti)oisln-cnp No.210 0t 20171 RES PO N DEI'ITSTRES PO N D EN TS OF 1 NO:278 F 'to". Petition under Section 151 cPc praying-that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the plt'tiJ^, in""nigrt Court may be pleased to pass an order restraining respondents r',eiein from alienating or creating third party interest in respect oJ tand admeasuri;tA"' 4?^24 gts of tand in SY' No' 51(Ac'17- pltt (n"' 9-08 gts) situated in 20gts) Sy.no.52 GachibowliVillage,serilingamparryrr,,tanoal,RangaReddyDistrictandpass Gounsel for the Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Gounset for the Respondent No'32 : SRI E' ANISHA REDDY G-so st:) si r'lo -sS 1 108 ctvlL REVIS roN N NO i21I OF XtlVz Petition Under sec{ion e1 of A'P (t'A) -I"i9l%ilu::"J::F*3?frtt f ir.flFJ;I,"*iiil{lr::m'n:fr "'i#lRi"1Th;oo,o'"."' Between: ,r8"*fi Ri:ts:,3j:i33$f,"#fl E:B$qi"i3*?L1'l'^l3if;'of :'tg'"d:'Ili ,S*S?-SHoEEX;;le#"ffi Ll[:$,'?fl S*.?X,lf 1L"?ff tllii'I"fi #,i; District. District. 'F,#;fi l:$rjA:'3lhg,3f^fi')[fl &':E]''if,3:.?:1'?'^]::f;''fi :S?""#t;I; District. ^[lli,lqI"',lf ["nl,:ii"'s[,ffit#ii'41"::3*l'r"'ir'iti""oo* 5. Khaiamet Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 48 yrs'' o. Ktrananret Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 44 yrs'' z. Kftrnunl"t Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs'' All are r\griculturists' Fi/o H'No'l-35' Gachibowli' Rangareddy District' gB;lidT.t tt,?'?^:^BYfl:lr8r6*rd as LRs or the deceased P4 vide AND ,t[S',:$S?ifi 1"..",i:,tfitYtr,sfl ,[:3i:fi :i,'Jf.i,I3"",,V33X8XiS,",o, PETITI.NERS '[,i'g11il["?,#/3;5n"t""[,'f*,#3316?"i1"?lvears'cccHousehordwork '*q+;tuinffiff:fi:$*$Hi"*$Hi:+ffi ;iaffi ;3"&'u"' 'H:vrilffisfud,E$|:8faffifii,$'i:i#"i*1r""i3'3;3'?i'u*' 'iuli**:HHrl?Hfi *l'hi'i.i*ruaffi a133J"tri;3i'%i1]*' 'ELff islsJiilaonaoos/tor-!3:'iff.'iliIfl LilB:':P'iH33Jft?''irf'"3'3'?S 109 T.Sp.Gr.Dy.Collector&TheRevenueDivisionaloffi@r,Rajendranagar Division. S.Ws.KastopaCorporation,Rep.byitsManagingDircctorSriAnilKumarR l(amdar effi"*1?3x,1ifl1tif i'H?itsl33#isl?ns'fs"'',if"ffi ;?Ho, iji"dffii:iDied Per LRs 23 to 27\ '.ffi i'Jl&T,'HreRr/o' ,uE:filit?il13l?n'ffi 11.Smt. G. Laxmamma, wo..& shankar Aged aborlt 6p vears' occ Housewife R/o. H.No .1 -4l,Gachibowli village'Seriii"gimpiity Mdndal Ranga Reddv District. 1,f, B?'X#f,lt"*??t'r111?ffi

12.G.Darshan,S/o.G.Sha1|arAgedabout4l..years,occAoricultureRl/o. H. No. 1 -44, c aChibowti vilage s"ft ii6iiip"rri,-Grioal Raiga Reddy District'

13. G. suqeq!,.9r9 G- shan\a1 Asgg about 3e vears' 3ffi1^?:it':'i:frY"b '"'H.r\rt)-_6ili t et za, cichiboilti Village Serilingamr ReddY District. "tn H. ul. i -?+, o

14.G. shiya [u1nar, s/o- G' shankar Ased about lZ veg,slg;1fl[:t'i'5;"Y,& ' -' iEblrri vN ag " S eri I i-ng a mpallv Mant 15.G. Prakqqh,-p/o. G. shankar As^ed about 35 vears' -serilingampally Mar ' "' 16.smt. G. susheela, w/o' G' Krishna Ased about oe ffii,3giip1#1", H :No J:44,'c;;hiuowii Vittige, 3:ff}rq;1":tlfi53oYBi"n". RI1o. H. No. 1 -44:'6;chioo*ri Vi tt"ge' Sbrilingampallv District. 17 . G.sanieevl s/o' G' Krish na Aqed about 32'yqp'rfi"*?t3[:f.fl3i.tri"t. "' H' r.rt i1Zi, G i.il io"*i i vi i t a g e, S e ri I i ns a m pa I lv Ma t 1g.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about.29-y-ears. occ Housewife F/o' H . N o. 1 -+ +, c rthidJ;ii viir rsj J j $ii fitffipanv Mi no dt Ra nsa Red dv Di strict' 1e.G: J?ipar,.s/o. G. Krishna 4.g"d about 27 vears'-o"&ltil""s}Esrla.' *"''- 20.G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna Age-d about 25 years, occ Aqriculture R/o' 44, G achibo*ii Viri rg"" ; S;il i"ng"mpa|Iy Minda| Rat H.No.1-44, Gathibowti Village-, S"rilffiir;iffy t'A'anOal danga Reddy District' 'G;;hi6'owil Vittiselserilingampallv Ma

21.c.Pravq9n,^s/o. G- Krielrla AsPd about 23 v.ga-ry'S"i ' ''H.No: -AA, 22.JointCollector-1,[a19aEg*{vDistrict.(RespondentNos.gto2larenot 23.M. Suguna W/o Late Manikona Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs'' 24.M.ChiranjeeviS/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged40yrs'' necessary Parties tn tnls uKl AglS:'tHl?&ooir,rir,.

25.M.MaheshKumar,S/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged34yrs., 26.M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs" 2T.M.PravallikaD/oLateManikondaYadaiah'aged22yrs' 110 All are R/s H-No.1-57t}t1, Street No'3' Serilingampally' CangaredclY District' (Respondent!4-&eTiiiiln?ffiTtl?tr,#rdasLRsor iier C.o. dt-18-2-2 Gachibowli, the deceased R9 as RESPONDENTS t.A. No: 1 oF 2Qrrz(cRpMp' NPJ,E9'f,-'?=o=:!71 PetitionunderSectionlslcPcprayjng.ll'atinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit firecr in support of thg j;tit#;th"-HiEt court mav be preased to pass an order restraining respondents;g;;'from ilienating or creating third party interest in respect oi land'admeasuri'aiA i9- +Z;34 gts of lind in SY' No' 51(Ac'17- 20gts), Sy.No. ;;' a;.1siogi"f'siNo _ss ryI (Ac.e-08 sts) situated in G achi bowr i Vlragl] S;riti;A;-p;Uy n1anoal, Ransa Reddv Di strict' Counsel for thr: Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN'MOHAN REDDY counser for the Respondent Nos{,2,3,5 : Mrs. s AND s LAw ASSoCIATES 111 cwlL E N NO o Petition Under section 91 of A'P CI,{). Terranw and Agricultural Lands Act' ffi ffi ff##nxgit""?#',:il13:r"r"tu"a'a:,Li3lilitF2t54oat2o14 ""T"ir*louR1r:,ili,'6?;f,r3$$iiVft District' iffi S'S'.i#,&H:,1,0il??,BPffi '0?'ffli'ii ,Sil3:.g5i:.'A5*fjft ,Yffi:Sl'SS.ft ffi 5h'JJf ffi;"?f; H'ff lt'E#8t District. .Ei:.,;l:1i13:,Sj3.B3$fiJiiffi E':3*YfiH:ts,i,iiJB'"f;P€3S'"'"#'Iii District. A;ft; R;n.i, Distlict' (Died Per LRs) ^f ift ffi lil"*.Jly,ft i-,'i:;.1'i::Aifj'#f i't,f,%Ts3'lf; Xl#'J'i,iti""",T 5. Khanamet Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 48 yrs'' 6. Khanamet Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 44 yrs" 7. Khanamet Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs" Petitioners S to Z ar6 Rgriculturists" R/o H'No'1-35' Gachibowli' Rangareddy as LRs or the deceased P4 as per District. CS:t'nat,l:Llfffi,ifr$S$sr6"r8l" PETITIONERS AND Rep bv its Secretary sri P Naravana uoo't 53 vears' occ Business R/o' ' RSYiSB [i]E.Uitfr$it3.'f" , y;?K8lAli,ri"?,8;y;tir?Bgr:Slfloed .Hf; yiYS?,ShyJ?"*.?"1U?Y;,11?3,Xl"1Yifo'vearsoccHousewire' o 5. Gadda s-antsr, s{9,ll3if;f,j1[;?tr"tg:"#:H?y,,l H No 1-38/1' Gachibowri 5ru;3"t Ri": Igs'"q: h::L ft;llf ii.',h8f*lti: E,Y"',*"?as Aged about Village, SerilingamPallY Gachibowri

6. Gadda r$"Il'": 9/-?.-ll!1ffi35[;?tr"i8:"fiX5!? $luo,.!i*o '-tu/1' Village, Serilingampally '3x?#,ffiffi Hir:,1iffi?artfr""^€Jt"Jl'tle"ifliGachibowriVi,age' ' $Sr,8!:ffi ,iit^lx's#$;i"#1l$:", t*tlt: *' Fr/o G ach i bowri V,rase' 1t2 ry*,#r,#*"?,i"J:l?Xt j",$Shffi f giHHYre'R,o'GachibowriM,ase' ,0.$;;fliffift -:i"^;,lx'sif [1?u"fl s&B?:n:11'*'Rr/o'GachibowriVirrase' €r, S/o. late Khasim Ali Oo Ag{c1'r$ure' Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' 1 1 .]vld. Waz€ ' ''SE liiiii.-pi v ljtanoat Ransa Reddv District' 12. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o' late Manikond-a Kondaiah Aoed 52 vears' Occ Ao riculture ruo. n: uo. r iiiTi--d;Hit-ili' ffi iinsima-pllv Ran ga Red d v Distric{. (Died Per LRs) "P,u'"1?,1u'liit33;,1il3-?iffi fifl!:'#f, ifi !##'33{sfi [";3336,n3[1]lir"" ' - 14.Mr:Babaiah,S/o.lateBalaLingaiah.occAgriculture,Fi/o.GachibowliVillage' U&iffi;;p;rrv rtiairuat Ranga-Reddv District' ,'38,?,11Ui,il3;6,,i,:f, F,iH3fi L*8"trisiSi,[lre',Ri/oGachibowriVirrase'

16.Smt. Santamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ-Agriculture' Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' ' " Sliiiii"'Gii pliii-i'lanoat Ransa Reddv District' 17.Gadda Yettaiah S/o. Gadda Veeraiah O-ccAgriculture' Fl/o' Gachibowli " V'ffi#, istiijiililinipittv Mandal Ransa Reddv District' 1 8. Gadda Narsimha, s/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah .occagriculture' Rl/o' G achibowli ' " Vffi#,' $;i'rla'g5mpb-tiv-l'Iindal Ransa Reddv District' ,n ysfi,fle,l;i5,lik"t{s;11""Xff8:*i3',"tltJlcu*ure' Ri/o GachibowriVi,ase' 'oR[lrni.l"{iiro?.Yli"*Pri1:e::s"+fl ffi ffi :l'f R:??::'3i"i,:"#:a"}'r" DiStrict. 21 G- Dars,han. S/ o. G. Shankar - ft.f.to.t-++, Gachibowli Village Aoed about 41 years, Occ Agriculture Ryo' ,'dJrlri"ilrpitti Manoat Raiga Reddv District' -'ffi District "E,il!':3!a?!",,?;3:3f, l[T#f'ff &T$fi *E',iXii[t]il^i;i1''P'ifi :3::3ttffi3""#1fi ,'ft #353"fn]'i3Jly'3'S'i" 24.G. Pra|(ash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 years, occ Aoriculture Rl/o. H.No.1-44, cachibowli Vifi"S.,"S-,;ilfiSJmpitli ManOal Ra-nga Reddv District' nbSi,:'f 3l'3xi'Hf"ilo*"00, Districi. 'zsR[:HG:i{::iX"4:'3'"TlidS,,Tifi :;3t%?i,#:'Y"':?ift ,ffi i,3"fi #"#'eJXl", * 26.G. Sanieeva, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 32 years' Occ Aoriculture Ri'/o ' H.N;i'_A:t"inio"*rivii[g'.;,'Bi,iiri"-gilEt(, tvtanoat Ra-nsa Reddy District- 27.Smt. (i. Saritha, D/o- G.'Krishna Aged about.29-years' Occ Housewife-FJo' . '''il.ii;. i:42'Ciihioo*ri VirraijJ, sefiringlmpauy Mandal Ransa Reddv District. 113 liflft ,ti,l$tgm,fr ilf ilxfi e5'3"?"nl'#syBs*e',1*"'- *fa€ffi zog,{fl{3+'i""Js,ii*tri[ffif sf; i&:*3J&'ft ftff ^fl ::[':'f"fr i District-. '0fi ,[J1'-??:"'J&i3#tli,t"if Sgft h$'ff J'fr"ffi S"iAglS:"HL?#"0'o'.o 31 . Spl. Gr. Dy. cotr6A6ia-RDo; Reiehdranagar Division 32. Smt l! ggbhg Rani, wo..g. uri"g"[f,,["11J*ifl:fl.-3,L?ars' occ House wire' "'' Hid.' pioitro-+0, Telecom Nagar' Ased 53 vears' occ Business Fi/o' .. yis:t"{!F.5#ffii;rr# ,?yil8,I?rana .-Xi3;*Jl1[?i5:39Ji$!1,'-Pr"tri1?"[#iv"tS;'i3331[,?3J'??l]o* .u[$?"T"1H:ii?,][1ifrIr3""#*r:ffiH,*gBi3''ry[lgilears',occRtd *H;F"J!3H,t:ffi[fr i?+?'Y:'#3fi'ft S1?'H$##e"ffi 3?"?S; District. d a r Rr/o 5 - " L1'u?, +ffi':f,ilf,8?.,Et?[-5f B-:l[Jli S3d R:,tl X' [: ffi s'tlT (Respondent Nos 5 to 30 and 32 to {B,l:?l::::"J;k SlfiS3,T?fl*'Sd"Ji: ,u 39. M. Suguna Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs'' 40. tvl. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 40 yrs ' 4l.tvl.MaheshKumar,S/M.SugunaW/oLateManikonaYadaiah,aged54yrs., 42. M.Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs ' 43. M. Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22 yrs' AllareFUoH.No.l-s1t6tl,StreetNo.3.Serilingampalty,Gachibowli' CingareddY District' R12 as per c o sT.1i i".i3 f ix:ftH:,':?ldtf,ftrlft::J#?i;s?7i"o .RESPONDENTS 1 o t.A ?l'l , o petition under section 151 Cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in affidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtopass orderrestrainingrespondentshereinfromalienatingorcreatingthirdparty restinrespectoflandadmeasuring(Ac.42-24gts),SY.No.52(Ac.15-36gts), 114 Sy.No.53 part (Ac. 15-36 gts)' Sy'NO' 53 part (Ac'9O8 gts)' situated in Gachibowli Vilta'3e, Serilingamapally Mandal' Ranga Reddy District' Counsel forthe Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Gounsel forthe Respondent Nos'1'2 & 4 : SRI C SUiION Counsel for thc Respondent No'3 & 34 : SRI A BHARATH i(RISHNA Counsel'for the Respondent No'37 : MS' E ANISH AREDDY oN PETITION NO:998 OF 2017 : L Petition under Section 91 of A'P'(T'A') Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950, aggrieved by the Orders in Case No' F2t6O68l2O13' dt' 24-09-2016 on the fite of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District' *Il-HpJ,fl,*"A,T'fiXi" Between: REddv oisttict. ,gli3i.$fl o'A'*6fj1i!"i:fi :*,^'S*nffi *,uo:,llr'"ffi4.o0ff ?13r, B3:f,fl.Y;l71f[t??t*1,Tts1,'Ior"',fo3iii."3ff o€ff;I'E.Yd't District. .H,{l.ft District. R:lilBl3i?^B31ils'ffiTt3H'",,$3*?*"i',il3fi f;'off '03'?ll5ii -Xm:en*Tlll'iliitl#i:Er"",l,Bftl?'t"Sflfl '"1T$['';#:?*R"?fi iiBtoi-oisti"t' (Died Per LRs)

5. Khanamet Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged z[8 yrs'' 6. Khanamet Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 44 yrs'' 7. Khanamet Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs'' Petitioners 5 to 7 are Agriculturists' Rl/o H'No'1-35' Gachibowli' Rangareddy District. (Petiti'cners 5 to 7 are brought o1-1e^q1d as LRs of the deceased P4 as per ti.6.,'oi.za.i.1021 in l A No 3 or 2020) PETITIONERS AND ' fi T,3tS8#i{ SlL"$i"'J,I3a},'f 'hilffi ',",P,fi Xi,f i.?,,Hlitlfi iXY'$iLfr 3alPi8':""ffi i"f""ffi d 67 vears, Occ Housewife Fl/o' ellareddYguda, HYd.

3.P.RrlnuRao,D/o.P.S.GovindRao,Aged.4g.years,occHouseholeFl/o. H.No. G10, Srin tvasa roweis aeguinp6t' Hyderabad' l lt5

4. J. Dharma Rao, s/o' Bala Rao, Aged 5.9 ygrs' pcg Business R/o' H'No'1- "

5.M.GnDnlaKrishna,S/o.NarisimhaRao,Aged4O.y.ears.OccBusiness'FUo. sb/s/Bii+, pioi tto.s, vlttat Rao Nagar Madhaptir, Hvderabad. "' ii.N;5$,'AaIrstr'tlagar colony Serlingairpallv Mandal, Hvderabad 6-N.Mecra.Wo.K.AnandaKrishnaaged46years,occHousewifeH.No.Plot No.416, Road No.78, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad'

7.M.Papalal,S/o.RajaLingam,agedT4yeag,OccHouseholdRl/o'H'No'8-96' Madhtranagar, HYderabad.

8. G.V. Ramavatharam, S/o. Sampa-{urthi aged-S3 vegrs, Qgc ByEillg-"-"-P9-: -H.uo.a-+ag8/34'P6tNo.lo2,ffiResidencyNagarjunaNagar'Hyoeraoao. gG-L.Raiamani.Wo.G.V.Ramarratharamaged4Tyears,occHouse.wifeRl/o. " H:fu.i:'jiuiij'i.i;FioaNb:.iar, Raj Residendv Naga-riuna Nagar' Hvderabad' 1O.B.U.V. Annapuma., Wo. Krishna Murthy aged-s1 years' Occ Housewife.Ri/o' ' "' il.ilb.6:i'jb56/ialibi ft :i or; Rai Resiieicv Nas-ariuna Nasa r, Hvderabad. 11.V. Venkateswarlu, S/o. Krishnatlurthy.aged 53.years, Oc.g Busiry;9-!/-o--, H.tto.a-g+s8/34. Plot No.102, Raj Residency Nagarluna Nagar' Hyoeraoao'

12.M.K. Java Surva.. S/o. Parta Saradhi aged 53 years,-Occ Business R/o' '- i].iLlffi-i?i, Beiio'e eooo wu Hos[itat, oMasab rank' Hvderabad 13.Vemuri Viiava. Sri, Wo. Krishna Murthy aged 52 years, Occ Housewife Ri/o' H.No.8-12-24, St.No.8, Habsiguda' Secunderabad' ,.3.€:tileftTlU:fa#E'*lB'.Etgfi gilJJ,J,ff t^?f#i''ll::?#,'d 'uR,t#j'fo[rTgu.'il?,"1";13#iigf,t"?u^'"1i.?T,:"t:""8t'JnessRr/o'Prot 16 V. Anil Reddv. S/o. Krishna Reddy aged 52 years, Occ Business Rl/o Plot - lto.t t -s-at slRlz, 2nd Floor Red Hills' Hyderabad'

17.R.M.C.V. Prasad Rao, S/o. R. Venkate.shwaqElo aged 57.y.ears' oce '"b;;#;;,'i6.E6i tlo.2z, Hill Ridse Villas, 't58 Road, Gachibowli' Hyderabad.

18. D. Lakshmipathy Rao, S/o. D. Narasimhaiah-aged. 66 years' Occ Business '" Fi": i6t 1.6.4b6. e BlbCt' Major Residencv M-sab rank' Hvderabad lg.P. Vvdehi, w/o. Sivarama Kumar aged 53 years, Occ House wife Rl/o H'No'1- ' "' i o-36;7ilb :'i;; N;.7; b.;d'No. t-s-o e'a*ha navadi' Bes u mpet' Hvd erabad' 20. Mitta Manoi, S/o. Mitta Jagan Mohan aged 48 years' Occ Business Rl/o' H'No' G-10, Srinivasa Towers Begumpet, Hyderabao'

21. N. Srinivasa chakravarthi, s/o. Late N. Krishna Murthy aged^49 years, occ -' iii,siiijl'Jnvo. x.No. z-Fli' Siris Srinilavam Ganesh Nasar' chintal' Hyderabad.

22.J. Naveen Kumar, S/o. J. Ramesh aged 40 years' Occ Business R/o H'No'7- 75lA. Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad

23.J. Praveen Kumar, S/o. J. Ramesh aged 38 years' Om Business Rl/o H'No 7- 75/A, ChaitanYaPuri HYderabad. l16

24.C. Viswa na.tha Reddy, S/o- Sudhakar Red{y.age4 36 y9q5'.Om Business --'Fi..Viioii. tiiitage ou'post chapadu Manclil cuddapah Dstrict" 'uXi"Yiffi ili:i8:issrHi?*?li#B"o'3#i3??'"'r$XR?hBlr'#fffr[€, H$erabad - -'Fyo.

26.M.Raieswari,Wo.M.VenkiataRamiReddyagg.d3.gygatr'occHousewife Fbi No.i 1 , Phasel- ECI Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad' ----27.G. Anian,awlu, S/o. LateAnjaig.f' aSe! 64 years, Occ Bad'Seryce-fl-o=', -''l{.$2:86: r,,rJnimmadiuiri vttag6 Gandaed Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' ldbii"*Grt tt.i. i io 2i 1eo' pf ttreir ceR Holder CH' Shirra Rao' S/o' Ml-rdinna ageo 6g years, ocb Birsiness R/o' Hyderabad)

28.Gadda sankar, S/o. Maisaiah occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-38/ 1, Gachibowli -'Vil6G Seriling'ampalty Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 29.Gadda K.rishna, s/o. Maisaiah, occ Agriculture Fl/o. H.No.1-38/1' Gachibowli -'Vilt;d Serilingimpattv Mandal Ranga Reddy DistricL 3o.Sved Karcem, S/o. Khaia Occ Agriculture, Rl/rc' Gachibowli Mllage -- S6rilinga.paliy Mandal' Ranga Reddy District' 3,l.Md. Ghc,use' S/o. late Md. lsmail occ Agriculfure, Fl/o. Gachibowli Mllage - "SCritingampilly Mandal, Ranga Reddv District' --'Seritingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District'

33.Md.Wa:rir,S/o.lateKhasimAliOccAg{cultyp,R/o'GachibowliMllage --'Seritinganipally Mandal- Ranga Reddy District' 34.Md. wazeer, s/o. late Khasim Ali occ Agriculture, R/o. Gactibowli Village - ' Seriting,rmpally lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District'

35.Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. late \4anikond.a Kondaiah Aged [2 yeap' Occ --'[srilrlt]iJ Rv". i ttbl-ozlt ' Gachibowli' Serilingamapllv Ranga Reddv District. (Died Per LRs

36. D. Ganriaiah, S/o tate Darapalli Babaiah Aoed 62 vears. Occ Aoriculture Rl/o. H.No.1-56/t,'da"cni6;*li vill-rd Seiiiingarn"aptty, Ranga'ReddyDistrict' 37.Mr. Batraiah. s/a. late Bala Lingaiah 9cc Agriculture, FUo. Gachibowli village -Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' ,38.Swamv,S/o.lateBalaLingaiahoccAglculture,R/o.GaehibowliVillage Setllingbmpally Mand al, R-anga Reddy District' - -' 3g.Smt. Sirntamma, W/o. late Balaiah Occ4griculture. Fl/o. Gachibowli Village - - ' Seritingrampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' - zt0.Gadda Yettaiah, s/o. Gadda Veeraiah o_ccAgqqultgr_e. Ri/ o. Gachibowli Viilage Serilingampally Mandal' Ranga Reddy District

41.Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah occ_Agriculture, Fi/o. Gachibowli Viitage Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

42.Madiga Pentaiah., S/o. late Veelaiah Occ Agriculture. R/o. Gachibowli Village Seriliillampally lvlandal. Ranga Reddy District' tt7 t

43.Srnt. G. Laxmamma., Wo. B. ShankarAged about 6Q ye,ap'-Occ Housewife R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

44.G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 41 yqqrs, pcqfgnculluq.R/e, . . - H.No.144, Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

45.G. Suresh, S/o. 0. Shankar, Aged abo-ut 3,p years. Qcg-Agttqllture Ri/o. 1- . 1 .No.2$2iABl24, Gachibowli Mllage Serilingampally Mandal' Ranga Reddy District.

46. G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 37 yeais'-Occ Ag1iculture. R:/o. '- ft.mo.t-++, eachibowli Village Seriliirgampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 47.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 yeqrs, Oc9 4griculture.Ri/o.. . . . ft-Uo.1 ++, Gachibowli Village,Serilingampaily Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

48.Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna, Aged about 45 yqars, Occ House wife, '- nyd. X-.No.t-44, G'achibowli Village; S6rilingampally'Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 49-G- Sanieeva. S/o. G. Krishna Aoed about 32 years, Occ Agriculture Ri./o. - H.Uot'<+, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' 50.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o.0. Krishna Aged about 29y9ars, Occ Houlewife'Eq'. . - - ft.ruo.i-++, Gachibowli Village, Se-rilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 51.G. Jaioal. S/o. G. Krishna Aqed about 27 years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. H.No.1- - ++, CictriOowli Serilingamp5llv Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. u' R'"Y1?:t"73,bhil{,i[i&t".f',i3:Hl,?i'Itif"r,3fl*fl [3'[El,?fl3;ll". 53.G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 23 years, Qcc 4griculture.Vo-.. . . . -- H.t',to.t-a+, Gachibowli VillageBerilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy,District

54.Spt Or. Dy. Collector & RDO, Rajendranagar Division 55.Smt. N. Sobha Rani, Wo. N. Viiaya Kumar, Aged 45 years, Occ House wife, Rl/o. Plot No.40, Telecom Nagai Gachibowli, R.R' District.

56.V. 11 Raiend I. sRT, ra Prasad, S/o. Satvanaravana, Aged 53 years- Occ Business' Ri/o. Sanathnagar, Hyderabad.

57.V. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. V.D. Rama Reddy Aged aboutS0 years,.Occ Business Ryo. 8-3-31 5/3A, Maruthi Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad-

58.K. Radha Krishna Murthy, S/o. K.N. Sastry, Aged about.70 years, Occ Rtd' Employee, Fyo. Anand Nagar Colony, Khairatabad, Hvd'

59.Mr. B. Jhansi Lakshmi, S/o. Vasu Deva Rao, {ged about !5 yearl Qqc - Employee, Fl/o. Plot No.175, Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli Ranga Reddy District.

60.Diamond Hills Welfare Association, Rep. by its Secretary Sri P' Narayana Reddy S/o. late P.V. Subba ReddY 61 . M/ s. Kastooa Corporation, Rep. by its M.D. Sri And Kumar R Kamdar Fl/ o' 5- - S-S7, fop Floor. x'amat Hotel, Station Road- Nampallv, Hyderabad'

62.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy Districl (Respondents Nos' 28 to 53 and 55 to 59 are not necessary parties in this CRP) 118

63.M. &lguntr W/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs'' 64.M.ChiranjeeviS/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged,40yrs.' 65.M. Mahesrh Kumar, s/ M. Suguna wo Late Manikona Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs" 66. M. Srikanth s/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, agted 35 yrs.' 6T.M.PravaltikaD/oLateManikondaYadaiah,aged^22yrs. -Rtt are Rt/o H.No.1 -571611, Street No.3. Serilingampally, Gach[p-ow-t!, RangareddY District. {RR 63 to 67 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R35 as per c'o' dtli'e:I.ii,i5 il't.A.N6h 6f iozs cRP No.ee8 0f 2017\ 'n . ResPondentslResPondents l.A. NO: 2 OF 2r017(CRPMP' NO: 1'320 OF 20171 Petition under section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fireJ in support of the petition, the High Court maY..be pleased to pass a order resiiaining'respodents irerei from alieating or creating third party interest in respect of land adme-asuring Ac-42-24 gJ: of land in sy'No'S1 [AC'17- 2ogtslSy.o.521nc.ts-sogts]Sy.o.53-part[Ac.9-0sgtslsituatedinGachibowli Vif"g;, Serilingapally Madal, Ranga Reddy District' counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. D JAGAN.MotIAN REDDY Gounsel for th e Res po n de nts Nos' 1,6'7'8'e' 1 0',l3*ld 2J2'2?'27'62 : !'Jft Gounsel for thre Respondent No.4,6 12 & 57 : SRI A BHARATII KRISHNA Gounsel for ttre Responent No.61 : sRl E. ANISHA REDDY counset for the Respondent No.4 & 5 : M/s S AND S IAW ASSOCIATES counsel for flre Respondent No.12 : SRI A H CHAKRAVARTHY 119 9ML REVISION PETITION NO: 999 OF 2017 : Petition under section 91 of A.P.(T.A.) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' t 1 3' dt 24 0e-201 6 on the ll'3;,1111:::,:,ililinl -'i1", X1",1 ::886 Between: -c-acniuowli

1. Gadda Balaiah, S/o. Gadda MaisaiahAged about 70 yeals,.occ Agriculture " F6.-H.N;.i-Ca, village, Seilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy 2. Gadda chandraiah, s/o.Maisaiah, Aged about 6o..yeqq, occ Agriculture, FVo. -' il.t6.1-ab]I,-eicriloo*ii Seritingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy -Vittage, District District. '8,110fi i:iiia:3j""^33*iiJliffi 3':93$#'3*'o*''?'.l3if;'off 'tff ht'.,& District AND PETITIONERS/Respondent Nos'2 to 4 1 . Bellam Surender, S/o. B. Narayana Aged about 52 years, Occ Business 2. Smt. B. Bhagyamma, W/o. Late B. Kotaiah Aged about 70 years' Occ Housewife. ResoondentNos.land2areFl/o.FlatNo.203,TarakaramaEstatesH.No.3- 4-5121 1 4, Barkatpura, Hyderabad -27.

3. Smt, CH. Pramila, W/o. Ch.V-S.S.N. Raju Aged about 49 years, Occ Housewife

4. CH. Prethi, D/o. CH. V.S.S.N. Raju, Aged about 26 years Rep' by her father and GPA Holder Ch-V.S.S N Raju Resoondents Nos. 3 and 4 are Wo. H.No'B-2601/B/1 Noomagar, Road No.i0, Baniara Hills, HYderabad. -i.

5. K. Sudhir Kumar, S/o. K. Pandu Aged about.62 years' OccRetd' Employee "' iiiol l.io.i: z-aizit, c.e. colonv,-Bag h Amberpet, Hyderabad' 6. Smt. A. Srilatha @ U.srilatha, W/o. A.S.M. Raju Aged about 42 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. Ameerpet, Hyderabad'

7. A.S.M. Raiu. S/o. A.V.N. Raju, Aged about 48 years,-Occ SeMce R/o' Flat No.101, Sii Sai Datta Apartments, Srinivasa Colony secunoeEpao' 8. Smt. K. Padmavathi, W/o. K.S.R.K. VarmaAged about 42 y.ears,999- _-HousewifeR|/o.FlatNo.l0l,SriSaiDattaApartments'SrinivasaUopny Secunderabad.

9. Smt. N. Madhavi, W/o. N.V.Raju Aged about 46 ye-ars' Occ Housewife Ri/o' "' Fi;i 1.6.a'03, nnuraoni Mansioh, 92, Jyoti colon! Secunderabad - 16' t20

10.Smt. E. Viiayalaxmii Wo' Frasad Aged about 46 years' Occ Housewife 'Rl/o' VisakaPatnam. ,,[i.1,ff '15. j*[:TiJ,1Ht"?{fi[Jr:ii,:fl18#',-:3:13::t'":lI?1[: I " fi Ai;![isH,[' 3-3,I'B tY#J: T:lilfl'"j'3f'V:*ui"?"#i'?ff"' Secunderabad - 15. Resoondent Nos. 11 and'12 arc Rep' by theirGPA Holder U' Shivarama nru{zl-i:iai"*gnrent*#ilsm.l+:s&1r;,?3i#",iis5[p'ov"" Hyderabad. '

13.B. Venke(eshwar Rao, S/o' Late D'S' Rao Aged ?Pout Employee R/o. Kesora;'6;-;;;t};;tor!1 biianttr Nagar karimnagar District' Housewife Rl/o'

14.D. Padmaia, Wo. D. Bhanu Murthy Aged about 47 yeapj 9.c9 *' ft;#il;Gi,'.ini Fi&ow. easanth Nigar Karimnagar District' Housewife Ryo. u.No. r -iiE Shill'A; Ni;gli' etranoanagar Serilingampallv Mandal, R.R. District.

15.Smt. A. :Sandhya Sri, Wo' A' V' Subha Rao Aged about 52 vears' occ 66 vears' Occ Retd' .16.T. Murari Sudheer, s/o. T. Venkateshwarlu Aggd aboutST years,.occ Retd' '" il;k;;;R/".Frdil.ro.r'dr ' Aiitrira encue,?lot No'33' Kalvan Nasar - I' Hy<ieritrad - ga. lT.Smt.G.lnduMadhavi,Wo'RamMohanAgedabout42years'Occ Houserarife

18.Smt. P. Shanmukah Sreedevi' Wo' P'M'G' Srinivas Aged about 41 years' Occ Housewife' Resoordents No. 17 and 18 are Fl/o' Plot No'.85-A' APt' qPq' Samskruthi 'P;iJ#,;,Iiffi C*;ronv,Coiot'to'tz,aanlaraHills'Hvderabad'

19.Smt. Cl. Sitha Ratna Kumari, W/o' K' Leeladhara Rao Aged about 50 years' Occ Govt. Servant 2O.K. Jayaprakash, S/o. K. Leeladhara Rao Aged about 28 years' Occ Employee Resoo,ldents No. 19 and 20 are Rl/o' Flat No'SD' Jain Adarsh' Jain Housing Cot,inl', KondaPur, HYderabad' 21 .Chekuri Maniira, D/o. CH' Sripathi Rao R/o. H.No.40-9-93/1 , Sainagar vennela VijaYa'rada, Krishna District' Aoed about 28 Years, Occ Student tiospital Road Beni Circle, ,,RJfl District. L",.R5l'..T:fl,i"t3,#ifff :i=1'*,ff3lr8l3'"!3?.'-"3f,iSTBL''i:::',"

23.P. Sunitha, D/o. P. Venkat Reddy Aged epo$ 3? years Fi/o' Flat No'102' Laxminarsimha Apartments Barkatpura' H)6eraDao'

24.Smt. l(akumanu Jayalaxmi' W/o' K'-Srinivala Rao Aoed about 48 vears Rl/o ' H. No. 1 6-2-75 1 /9 s/rrra,' Uai n-am'Coi6iiy Oitsut<frna"gar' Hyderabdd - 60

25.The S;GDC & RDO, Rajendranagar Division' t2t

26.Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah Aged 52 yeans, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No .1 -67 I 1, Gachibowli, Serilingamaplly Ranga Reddy District. (Died per LRs)

27.D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged62y€ars, gcgAg1lgqllure R/o. H.No.1-56/ 1, Gachibowli Milage Serilingamaplly, Ranga Reddy District.

28.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. B. Shankar Aged about 6O yeqrs,_Occ l-lousewife Ri/o. H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village Serili-ngampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

29.G: Darshan, S/o. G. ShankarAged about4l years, OccAgtctlltureRyo. H. No.1-44, Gichibowli Village Seiilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

30.G. Suresh, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 39 years, Occ Ngri-cqlture R/o. H. No.262 tZlW Zq, G ach ibowl ivillage Serilinga mpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

31.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 37 yearc.OccAgricultulg R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

32.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 years, Occ Agripulture R/o. H. No.1-44, Gichibowli Village Seiilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 33.Smt. G. Susheela, W/o. G. Krishna Aged about 45 years, Oqc Housl" wife F/o. H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

34.G. Sanjeeva, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 3?.yqqrs, O-oqAgficulture R/o. H.No.1'-44, Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal RAnga Reddy District.

35.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29 years, H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village Seri-lingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 36.G. Jaipal, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 2!.yeqrs.,-Occ Agniculture R/o. H.No.1- 44, GacniUowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. ffoltsewifq R/o. -Occ

37.M/s. Kastopa Corporation, Rep. by its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar.R lGmdar R/o. 5- 8-57, Top Floor, Kamat Hotel,'Stalion Road, Nampa11v, Hyderabad.

38.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. (Respondent Nos. 26 to 36 are not necessary Parties in this CRP).

39. M. Suguna W/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs., 40. M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs., 41.M. Mahesh Kumar, S/ tvl. Suguna W/o Late Manikona Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs., 42. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs., 43.M. Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged22yrs. ' , All are R/o H.No 1-57t611, Street No.3. Serilingampally, Gachibowli, RangareddY District- (RR 39 to 43 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R26 as per C.O. ttt.tB.2.2o25 in l.A.No.1 of 2025 in cRP No.999 of 2017) RESPONDENTS :rr;:;;: :ii::ffi trE--EI;liE:f LI i: : 12,2^ 1 I PetitionunderSectionlsl.ofcPcprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the altidavit filed in supd;t tn; f"titlon' the High Court mav be herein from alienating or pteased to pass ,n *0., .esti'ning _resogngents creating third party-inlereg1 1n 1g"-g"rilr t"n'o adm-easuring Ac' 42-24 gts of land in Sy.no. sr tn."]{il!'ffi,-b.y1-{6ltsC O.15-36 sts)' Sv'No'51 part (Ac' e- 08gts) situated in'C"-"i-i-tjowfl vifiage, deriting"*pitty Mindal' Ranga Reddy District. 7 PetitionunderSectionlslcPc.graying{r3t.in^thecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit fited in support of the qfl*;if,oHrgh 9:Yfr mav be pleased modifv the -uo'tg"2rf2y17 in CRP No'999/2017 bv order dated CTg.OCZO1Z in 9RPilP deteting the e>teii;ith" tano meniion"t therein i'e' Ac'42'24 gts and confine th; ;;;" to thr: extent of Ac'36'25 gts' lA NO: 1 OF 2024 "No PetitionunderSectionlslcPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavil. filed in suppgrt gf til *i'i(l:t9-Iigt' Court mav be pleased to 1321t2o17 in CRP No modify the ordeiiut"J'bg-og-26;f i" Cip MP 999/2012 insteai oin" +z,.zqcuri"r **" may be confine as Ac 36'25 Guntas situated ,t Ca"niio*ii Viff"g", S"ifitnga*pally Mandal' Ranga Reddv District id p""oi"g disPosal of above CRPs' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3, 4, G & 7: SRI cH SIDDHARTHA SARMA Counsel for lihe Respondent No'37: SRI E' ANISHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 1&2: SRI C SUMON CounselfortheRespondentNbs'6to12:SRIKSRINIVASAPRASAD counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1s,17,19 to 22'- A. Bharath Krishna 123 N O: 1070 20 Petition under 91 of A.P' (T'A') Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950' aggrieved by the Orders in Case'No' F21555t2014' dt' 24'09'2016 on the file of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. GADDA BALAIAH' S/o. Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 vears' Occ Aoriculture ruo. H.t{o.r-5'S,6'"iniUorrtinitiige S6ritingampally Mandal Ranga R6ddy District. 'g:$S::li",1'"i9ln?l?,*li'"'igi3'sg"i'b"3*,X'"lfi"fu??^fl ffi X"fi 5f, '8:n?"lf linitfl fl ;'efi,11i,,1l31"38l'.,ff :ffi :fl;lrl'"ffi iB"?f *"'itiy5i:?,Y: 4. Khanamet Shivaiah, S/o. Khanamet Balaiah .Aged about 78 years. occ Aoricutture R / o. H. n,ili -'siiiilcrt6-ioowii Vittige Serilingampdlly Mandal iiEris, Redov District. (Died per LRs) District.

5. Khanamet Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged z[8 yrs'' yrs" 6. Khanamet Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged '14 7. Khanamet Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs'' Petitioners5toTareAgriculturists,Rl/oH'No'1-35'Gachibowli'Rangareddy District. (Petitioners 5 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased P4 as per ti.6..'ii.I+. r1 )ozi in t.e.N5.g or 2o2o) .. PETITIONERS AND l.N.S.CHAKRAVARTHY,S/o.lateKrishnafrlturthyAged42vears'occ Employee Rvo. n.ruo.+d-5'fi 6i' Gil;ali6oiGan6str Nasar' Chintal' R'R' District.

2. The Special Grade Dy Collector/RDO' Raiendranagar Division' R'R' Distrit' 3. Manikonda Ieo?i3l, S/o' late Manikonda Kqnd?ia1Ag?flrt'-xfff-3S& " iUri&Tffi; nvo. H. t'io.t-ozl 1, Gachibowli, Serilins District. -B,f"liiiii'31"J,il1?',,i81'X33?ft lt"A'"fr ,,:it?H3#.i'Jl:'T[i:""" 5. Smt. G. Laxmamma, W/o' B shankar Aged about 60 vears' Occ Housewife "' Hiil'n:iv-o::i+, ditniulli,r"ivirr'jiii 5;iiiingimpal[ Mdndal Ransa Reddv District.

6. G. Da rsha n,-S/g. .9. S.h a n ka r As ed about 4 1..vea rs' " H.lll]i:i+, biJtriuowti Villase Serilingampallv Mat 8i"Sn;[""' HHo"dyfu u' " 124 District. 'f :*'.lfila?li,?3lalffiSsffi ,H$'"??ffi fiff f'A''iHl'Hfr #t"oo, 8. G. Shiva l(umar, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 37 years, occ Agtic.u]tu1g f{ 9. " H.N;:i;r,tifrioiiviaiv1iii,|Ser1ingampa1y Ma-ndal Ranga Reddv District. 'fi ,[f, 1iiil'e'is.3;$iliiiffi ig*-x'f.*3:,,f;ft F;.o"fl*xfl l3',AHffi fl8,".." 10.Smt. G. Susheela, Wo:'G:{ris'hna Aged about 45 vears' occ House wife R/o. H.No.1 -44, cacniooiai'Vririii6 SEritingimpativ'Mandal Ranga Reddv District. rrgf,fii?iYa"'ii*9,,ffi lil3.€3$,,iH*o'"1,I",fi f;.:iRfff ',"H'JJ:fr?.u., "i1;?-iilt!Xh'.ff;?,,{fl*"34ff; ffi ltsB,i',,'"l?ffi i3,"1#"HBEx'i'BHi". H No 1' " ?;,'3'l*ffi ,?ill[Xl'S$e€X$Biil,'.1J"?1i.ffi #::,o'],5"''fl & 14.G. Nave,'n. S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 yga-ry' Occ Agriculture Fl/o' '- H'r.i.i:ri.i,'ci-cnibbw|ii/iEg;5;ririnsil".'pa1ry Mindal RSnga Reddv District. 15GPlvji?:'Ib'JS6,gffii}'15nt'.*rft lS:}"?'"ffi iB"3:i$,nil,?'[[3#8,.n'", ' necessaLry parties in this GRP MP)

16.Joint Collector-l, Ranga Reddy District' (Respondent Nos 3 to 15 are not 17. M. Suguna Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs ta u Chiarnleevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 40 vrs ' ig. il M;;,;ai Kumar, s/ M. Suguna wo Late Manikona yadaiah, ased 54 yrs., 20.lvt. Srikrnth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs ii. u. pravattika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 22 yrs' - . -' . Aii ";;it; H.No.1-5716/1, Street No'3' serilingampallv' Gachibowli' RangareddY District. inn-r? t 2i are brought on re99rd^as-Ll: btla.z.zozs in l.A.No.l ot2o25 in cRP No"t070 of 2017) ".f^t!: deceased R3 as per c'o' ZZ. V. puntachandra Rao, S/o. M. Venkat Rao' Aged about 61 Years' Occ: -- pii*i" Service, No.2o2' Shathavahana Nagar' opp K P H B Colony' Ze ftfuri.ii Om prafasn S/o. Mamidi Adavaiah, aged about 80 Years No 2-2- Kukatpally, HYderabad. ' 1 1 64tC,Tilak Nagar, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad ...lmplead Respondent Nos'22 and 23 Respondents22and2Sareimpleadedas.p-ejC-ou(orderdated06.10.2025vide l.A.No.1 of2024madeinCRP.No.1070o't2017' ...RES,ONDENTS l.A. NO: 1 Of: 2017 CR .NO 1424 oF 2017 PetitionunderSectionlslcPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pr.. rn order restraining iespondents herein from alienating or creating third party i"l"i".t in re,spect of laid admeasuring Ac.42-24 gts of land in Sy.No.S'l(Ac.17- 125 20gts), sy.No.52 (Ac.15- 36 gts),- sv.Nos3 part (Ac-9-08 gts) situated in Cllf.,ifio*li Vittage, bertlingampalty Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' COUNSCI fOr thE PEtitiONErc : SRI. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY counsel for the Respondent No.l : SRI M V HANUMANTHA RAO Counset forthe neiiionAent Nos.6 to .15 : SRI SAURABH RAJ VERMA Petition Under section 91 of A.P (T.A) Tenancy and-Agricultural Lands Act' 1950 aggrieveo ui tir; od;t dated 24.09.2016 Passed in case No' F2l54o912o13 ;; th" fr6 ottn" c6urt of the Joint Cotlector-;, Ranga Reddv District' Between:

1. Gadda Balaiah, s/o. Gadda M_aisaian3gp.9 about .J0 -y-eary, .occ Agriculture Mandal Ransa Reddy 'seiilingampally "e"""ti66irfi ViIEG R/o. H.No.1-3d, District. zEifj:$n:083"[,3,{i;Yffiil*,^'Sirft l!}l"B:'t"'ffi ,9r"JH',il5'H"Y& District. 3. Gadda sukkaiah, s/o. Gadda.M-aisaiah Ag..ed about 53-years,.occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-26,"d;;Li6;ii-tiid$, Sefitingampal[ Mandal Ransa Reddv District. 4. Khanamet shivaiah, s/o. Khanamet Balaiah, Aged about 78 years' occ Aoricutture nyii.-'Fi.iro.i:ia/i,-eainiuJ*ii Vittag6, Serilingampallv Mandal R6nga ReddY District.

5. Khanamet Bikshapathi s/o Late Khanamet shivaiah, aged 48 yrs', 6.KhanametKumarS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged44yrs.' 7. Khanamet Mallesh s/o Late Khanamet shivaiah, aged 34 yrs'' Petitioners 5 to 7 are all Agriculturists R/o H'No'1-35' Gachibowli' RangareddY District (Petitioners 5 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased P4 as per b.o., ot.z+ .1 1 .2021 in l.A.No.3 l2o2o.\ PETITIONERS AND

1. Smt. T. Vanaja, Wo. T. Pradeep Kumar, Aged 52 years' Occ Household 2.Smt.T.Lathangi,Wo.T.VidyaBhushanAged50years'occHousehold

3.Smt.B.Sangeetha,W/o.LateB.RameshAged60years'occHousehold

4.Smt.T.Swarna,Wo.T-VirupakshaAged4gyears'OccHousehold

5.Smt.T.Padma,W/o.T.ViiayaKumarAged4gyears'OccHousehold 6. Smt. V. Shankuntala, W/o. Muralidhar Rao Aged 56 years, Occ Household 7 A sarathchandra, s/q A tr,,'il$3f.:f {i?,8rff:,t:?',"S1ioo,.nun,,., ResPondens.No 1la7 are Rl/o' I Hyderabad.. 126 'h1ilTl-1"-il3il,R*,8fH33f.i$i.#tf ,H;"";ATpf li.ei$-?.?'f;lf lfi#;l"Sf,:Hrm?.iB8fl fr lJ33Ea3* ,.RilU,?llXl1g&$"9l$llffi?f;513[,ff ?191#:"'occHousehord it,tg:ff ft%t"S$.occBusinessR/o "ffi*tm?S5'3ilikaY.''lurfft83:ilB3$ft '8&if, District. i3!'fSif'T'[?T*9"& " &f ?i$?ilii,3i.,"; 8i?'P,3ffiif}i-??31*'fl3*,33'i('?ffi "35"*3tiuJi"fn;' ,,R[l,giulffi ?31?.][$?vi,l33€!;],H33f B:ii]ifJ"?114ffi l,e1lji#',"' District. ,.8:,p"1fj5l""#63.f; lililtra:SS*r,?f#oJ,,I1?f;.",f 3.1ru:*'35?flo1"*, ,ufi ,f.,lf.i$iif",t?;35f, ffi#q,?f"e$:??ffitrff ''A',ll'i'H:?#o*"00, District. ,uE,fjl,:lf%,"Tr,B$fvfi l6SI3Lifl f$"X?i,ifi ,'lnH8::gE:'{3Jl.i3'Y*e', .rzgf;ll?il'.'jSi3iil1lfiJ'":g*,i"oJ"*33,,I"'ft T;fli".:fl ffi '$:!?fl34''o ,ufl [1',G,uf; District ,nfi B;Hi6"3i,\,1il:33:3Sfi fl "fl3?$i'?r''fi 3i?f R",ff ]"f"H5; .o:#t1lll&3!f*""HHf"1'Y",fi :?;.:iRffi ':iitJE,lo"*n" ^?,i1,:o?ir'Jf, 'o ift';!,*'.1g?n'#;?v[-,?j]li,tfif,lr3L'Jj'',f^]3fi1?'???5'""H'"%t'i"#i;"' ,,?i,,Blfliffi ,?,,[t1g"tfl""3"",Tiii;l^#S::3."'f']'d'"'JlY'S,$hHNo1- ,,f; $1ig,n",;''3ltB"f,ft 'Ill#"s"fi tru:3."Iffi li,?53't'ili,iJ.HE#r'ou,no or,on", ,.fi ,[,11,-??lbtJS,i3",5iim"if !:f, i"i:ffi J,fr',fi;,3",!A:ffi :''H:?fl

24.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' ,ui"o!.,T,"o#p^.J'*::t,Epp.Sfl ifl g'ffi :'Division(RespondentNos'11 Occ: House Wife 26.M. Suguna W/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs 27.M. Chiranleevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 40 yrs ' Occ: Agriculture 28. M. tvtahesh f'*"' Slo Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 34 yrs'' Occ: ' Agri<:ulture r27

29.M. Sril€nth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs" Occ: Agriculture 30.M Pravaltika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22yrs'' --'oii "* R/o H-No'1-57/6/1, Street No'3' Serilingampally' Gachibowli' 8$l8Lffi r"a""'!E"J'ff ffi :ffi'ot2o25 't{ingareddY District. trf{q*t"tSffili"b#,#f RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the ResPondent SRI D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY NOS.I tO 5 : SRI A H CHAKRAVARTHY 128 7i Petition ttnder Section 91 of A'P' (T'A') Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' aggrieved by the Orders in Case No' -F2l955/2016' dt'2449-2016 on the 1950, file of the Joint Collector-l' Ranga Reddy District' District. 't:y:alWffi 131'"^83*i'"'X'ffi3:B3f inds3h?T"?"13f, B'HSg'"#'Jfi (

7. District. 88]l.?i5t,,',, :r.i,"i'"'' T"'ffi T on record as LRs of the deceased P4 as per of 2O2o) PETITIONERS RangareddY .'S$*i:H3"ff AND il:#:1.:""TiEI"YiV?ii.HsrGabhibowriVirrage'

2. The Re,venue Divisional Officer' Raiendranagar Division 3. Dy. Collector & Tahsildar Serilingampally Mandal' - 4. Author,zed Officer Land Reforms' Collectorate' R'R' District' 5.StatiorHouseofficer,RayadurgaPoliceStation,R.R.District. 6. G. Sharnkar (Died Per LRs)' - 7. G'. Kris,hna (Died Per Lrs)' - '3$t,l;:ffi :lf,i%ffiiag"&t"li,l'I"li"i#i'GachibowriVi*ase r $sl,*3["J,'fit i,'3;11,'i#lri'H3lfr"3,$t:?:rture' Fuo' GachibowriVirrase 129

10.Mohd. yousuf, S/o.late Md. lsmailOcc_Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village '- Seritingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

11. Mohd. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim At! Oqg 4qriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village' Seritingampallf Mandal Range Reddy District. 12.Ahmed. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ {gri9t1ltu1e., Rl/o. Gachibowli - Viltige, Serilingdmpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 13. Manikonda Agriculture District. Yadaiah, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah Age.q 5! Years' Occ R/q:H,N6. i-62./. t, Gachibowli, Seril i ngamapl ly Ranga Reddy

14.D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Age{..Q2Jears, Occ Agliculture Rlo' ' ' F.r.r!]i-sGl'i,'CilhlUowtiVitiage SerilingamEpllY, Ranga Reddv District- 15.Mr. Babaiah, S/o .late Bala Lingaiqll O_cgAgriculture, Ri./o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampilly Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

16.Swamv. S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village - Seritingbmpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

12. Smt. Santamma, Wo. late Balaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' lg.Gadda Yeftaiah, s/o. Gadda Veeraiah o_ccAgrlqulture, R/o. Gachibowli - Vil6ga, Seritingimpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

19.Gadda Narsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah Qcc-fgriculture, R/o' Gpchibowli - Vil6G, Seritingampa[y Mqndal Ranga Reddy District' 2O Madioa pentaiah. S/o. late Veeraiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, -- Seriliigampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 21 . smt. G. Laxmamma, wo. B. shankar Aged about 60-years., occ Hor.lsewife - R/;. H.tfo.i++, CaifriOowtiVillage, Serifingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22.G. Darshan, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 41 .years, Oqc :{griculture R/o' -- H.l.rri:a4: badhiodwtiViiiage, Berilingampaliy Mandal Ranga Reddv District 23. G. Suresh, S/o. G. Shankar Aged aboq! 39..years, occ-Agriculture R/o. -" H.r.ro.z:aetaBiZaled*l6,owt'iVillage, Serilihgampally tvlandal Ranga Reddy District.

24.G. Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 37-years,_Occ Agriculture Rl/o. - r-r.ruo.r-Z+, OatfiiUbti1iVNage, Seril"ingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

25. G. Prakash, s/o. G. Shankar Ag_ed about 35 years, occAgricu[urq $/o- -" H.r..roJ-aa,'G;;hib;wft'Vitlage,Serilingampaily Mandal Ranga Reddv District.

26. Smt. G. Susheela, Wo. G. Krishna Rl/o. H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village District. Aoed about 45 Vears, Occ House wife , Sirilingampally tt/andal Ranga Reddy

27.G. Sanjeeva, S/o. G. K1glrna Aged ?bout 32.years, OgclAgricullurg.R/.o' - u.No.i-44:Ga":6iUo*tiViitage, Slrilingampalfy Mandal Ranga Reddy District- 'u iT,';?:-'-itX?i.',J&fv[,ETttS'?&3?,"S'''r''J:i!?'R3?5',"H??J'1"#I";" 130

29.G. Jaipal, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 27 yearsi 44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Occ Ranga R/o. H.No.1- District.

30. G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 H.No.1 -14, Gachibowli Village, Serili Occ District 3't.Gr Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 23 H.No.1-14, Gachibowli Village, Serili ,Occ ly Mandal RUo. Reddy District. ...,.-.--..32.lly'/ls. Ka:;topa Corporation, Rep. by its M.D. Sri Anil l(rmarBl(amdarR/o; 5- 8-57, Top Floor, Kamat Hotel, Stalion Road, Nampally, Hyderabad. 33.Joint Collector-l, Ranga Reddy District. (respondent Nos' 6 to 31 are not necessary Parties in this CRP).

34.M. Suguna Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs., 35.M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs., 36.M. Mahe,sh Kumar, S/ M. Suguna Wo Late Manikona Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs.' 37. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 35 yrs.' 38.M. Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 22 yrs- , All are R/o H.No.1-5716/1, Street No.3. Serilingampally, Gachibowli, RangareddY District. (RR 34 tc 38 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R13 as per C.O. dtla.z.zozs in t.A.No 1 ol 2o25 in cRP No.1188ot2ot7l RESPONDENiS :1O 17 CRPMP. NO: 1596 OF 201 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order restririning respondents herein from alienating or creating third party interest in resp,ect of land admeasuring Ac.42-24 gts of land in Sy.No.51(Ac.17- 20gts), Sy.No.52 (Ac 15- 36 gts), SyNo.53 part (Ac.948 gtts) situated in Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counset for th,: Petitioners : SRl. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Gounsel for th,r Respondent No.1 : AVANCHA H CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for thr: Respondent Nos. 15 & 17, 22to 31 : SRI SAURABH RAJ Counsel for thr: Respondent No.32 : SRI E. ANISHA REDDY 131 c L N o 588 0F 1 Petition under 91 of A'P' (T'A') Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950, aggrieved by the Orders in Case'No' Ft5884t2O13' dt' 24'09:2016 on the file of the Joint Collector-l, Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. Gadda Swamy (DIED PER LRS P2 AND PR3)' S/o Late Gadda Balu Linga died Per Lrs

2.GaddaRavider'S/oLateswamy,agedabout42years,occAgriculture. 3. Gadda Devender, S/o Late Swamy, aged about 39 years, occ Agriculture. -(';;;'rd5%'*?,",?iil,?08?"iR$3'1?,3f ,''1:?'8EFi^='?-'J ilotizo'tt lN cRP. 1 588/2ol 7) ,,;LqA'ml"*J"ri67li';iirff.ER8:tS6r"r:dt61o'2o25viderANo1 ,.3,",SL|","3ah"Raf"1i..".ffi :8':[bli8uf"%",'3".i3$1" -sf,:ls,"*#,fr 5. ;;;;. ;"r"e, S/o Late Mohd' lsmail' aged about' 60 vears' occ Agri' 6. Syed Sardar, S/o Syed Ahamad Ali' aged about 55 years' Occ Agrl' ,. Sr"U Nawab' S/o Late Syed Ahamad Ali' aged about' 50 years' Occ Agrl' e. Syed Pasha, S/o Late Syed Ahamad Ali' aged about' 45 years' Occ Agri' 9. Syed Saleem, S/ o Late Syed Kareem aged about' 50 years' Occ Agrl' 10.Syed Azeem, S/o Late Syed Kareem ' aged about' 50 years' Occ Agri' 1 1 . Syed Nayeem, S/o Late Syed Kareem' aged about' 45 years' Occ Agrl' 12.Syed lbrahim, S/o Late Syed Kareem' aged about 60 years' Occ Agrl' 13. Syed,Khasim, S/o Late Syed Kareem' aged about' 55 years' occ agrl' 14.Syed NadeeM' S/o Late Syed Kareem' aged about' 50 years' Occ Agri' 't5.Gadda yadaiah, S/o Late Gadda Ramaiah' aged about' 55 years' Occ Agrl' 16.Gadda Ariun, S/o Late Gadda Ramaiah' aged about' 46 years' Occ Agri' t 17.GaddaRaiu, S/o. Late Gadda Ramaiah aged about' 40 years' occ Agrl' 18.Gadda Ramesh, S/o Late Maisaiah' aged about 29 years' Occ Agri' 19.Gadda Lingam, S/o Late Gadda Babaiah aged about' 52 years' Occ Agri' 20.GaddaSadhan'S/oLateGaddaBabaiahagedabout'48years'OccAgri' 2l.GaddaKumar,S/oLateGaddaBabaiahagedabout'45years'OccAgri' 22.Gadda Satyanarayana, S/o Late Gadda Babaiah aged about' 39 years' Occ ..^^a Ann 23.Gadda Raiini Kumar, S/o Late Gadda Babaiah aged about' 38 years' Ocu 24.GaddaMallesh, S/o Late Gadda Babaiah aged about' 36 years' Occ Agri' Agri. Agri. \ 132 Agrl. Agri. 2s.Gaddapraveen; S/o Late Gadda Aashok, aged about, 32 y€ars, occ Agd. 26.Gadda'Elalaraj, S/o Late Gadda Balaiah,, aged about 59 years, occ Agri. ii.n"oo^Eishwar, s/o Late Gadda Balaiah aged about 52 years, occ Agrl' it.nr66, Pochamma, Wo Late Gadda Latchaiah aged aboUt 85 years' Occ Gadda Latchaiah , aged about' 53 years, Occ Agri' Gadda Ettaiah aged abor-rt 38 years, Occ Agrl' S/o Late Gadda Bhupal:agdd--ab6trt 40 year; Occ

29.Gadda .lKrishna, S/o Late 3O.Gadda l\IahiPal, S/o Late 3l.Gadda llantosh Kumar, 32.Gadda [iadanand, S/o Late Gadda Bhupal aoed abgut 38 years'-occ Agrl' 33.Gadda fianieeva, S/o Late Gadda Bhupal aged aboirt 35 years' Occ Agrl' 34.Gadda (iovardhan, S/o Late Gadda Bhupal aged about 33 years' occ Agrl' 35. C.Mahender, s/o Late Madiga Pentaiah aged'about 42 yeans, occ Agri' 36.C.Narerrder, S/o Late Madiga Pentaiah aged about 40 years, occ Agrl' 37.C.Surerder,S/oLateMadigaPentaiahoccAgrl. 3g.C.Ravinder, S/o Late Madiga Pentaiah aged about 38 years, occ Agrl' - 39.C.Devender, S/o Late tvladiga Pentaiah aged..,about 35 years, occ Agrl' (All are res;idents of Gachibowii' Vifi"&, -Seritingampally Mandal R'R'Dist' HYderatnd.) PETITIONERS AND ,, 1. The Joirrt Collector-1 , Ranga Reddy Dist'Lakadikapool' Hyd' z. tre Spl. Grade Dycollectgl,s'Revenue Divisionalofficer Raiendra Nagar Oivitidn, Rajendrd Nagar' R'R'Dist

3. The Dy. Collector & Tahasiidar' Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.Dist. 4. Authori;:ed officer Land Reforms, collectorate, R'R'Dist, Hyderabad' 5. M/s Dinrond Hills Wetfare Association, conaistilgof 588 Members "P. N;;;Vi^ a neOOy, S/o Late P'V'Subba Represr;nted by its_S ecreta ty, H;Ea;610 5/;"ors c, Aruh Apts' Rad Hills' Hvd'

6. M/s Ka:;topa Corporation, rep by its Managing.Partner, Sri. AnilKumar R. Ka m6 a r, af,"i H- ;i,"io pTr ooi, i(am ai riott-el, statio n Road, N ampal ly, HYderarrad. T.G.S.Raiu,Nationai.Director.fi/laharshitnstituteofCreative,Masabtank 8. G.Balaiah, S/o Gadda filaisaiah 9. G.Sharkar, S/o Gadda Maisaiah (died per LRs) 10.G.Chandraiah, S/ o Gadda Maisaiah 11.G.Krishna, S/o Gadda Maisaiah (died per LRs) 12.G.Sukkaiah, S/o Gadda Maisaiah 13.K. Shivaiah, S/o Khanamet Balaiah \ 133 l4.M.Yadaiah, S/o Manikonda Kondaiah

15.G.Gandaiah, S/o Late Darapalli Babaiah 16.Smt. G.Laxmamma, Wo B.Shankar 1 7. G.Darshan, S/o G.Shankar

18.G Suresh, Slo G.Shankar .19.G.Shiva Kumar, S/o G.Shankar

20. G.Prakash, S/o G.Shankar

21.Smt. G.Susheela, W/o G.Krishna

22. G.Sanjeeva, S/o G.Krishna

23.Smt. G.Saritha, D/o G.Krishna

24.G.Jaipal, S/o G.Krishna

25.G.Naveen, S/o G.Krishna 26.G.Praveen, S/o G.Krishna (Respondents 8 to 26 are R/o Gachibowli Village, Hyderabad.)

27.N Shoba Rani, W/o N VijaYa Kumar,

28.V.Rajendra Prasad, S/o Satyanarayana,

29. Laxman Prasad, S/o Satyan arayana,

30.Surender, S/o B.Suryana raYana

31.V Suresh Babu, S/o. V P.Babu Rao

32.Mrs. V. Udayini, W/o V Sudhakar

33.V.Prabhakar Reddy, S/c V.D Ramreddy

34.P.V.S.R.Das, S/o V.P.Subba Rao

35.K.Radhakrishna Murthy, S/o K N,Sastry

36.Smt. Ch. Prameela, W/o Ch.V.S S.N.Raju

37.Smt. Ch Preethi, D/o Ch V S S.N.Raju

38.Smt. Deepika Chava, D/o Hanmantha Rao

39.Chava China Veera Bhadraiah, S/o Lte Kotaiah 40.Smt. Chava Hymavathi, W/o Chava China Veera ghadr;iah 41.Chava Srinivas, Sio chava Hanrnantha Rao 42.Smt. Ch.Bhanumamathi, \{/o Ch-Sivaji 43.Smt. K.Usha Rani, D/o K S.K.Murthy, 44.Dr. K.Manmohan Reddy, S/o. KVenkat Reddy

45. K.Praveen Kumar Reddy, S/o K.Sankar Reddy t34 46:Smt. GViiaya Lakshmi, Wo C'Chandra Mouli 47,Smt. P.Prameela Rani, Wo prasada Rao 48.Smt. T.Pildma, W/o VijaYa Kumar 49.Smt. T.Srnrama, Wo T.ViruPaksha 50.Smt. V.Slrakunthala, Wo Muralidhar Reddy 51.A.Shardt Chandra, S/o Aniaiah 52.Smt. B.S;angeetha, W/o Late Ramesh 53.Smt. Harneeda Begum, Wo Gularn Dastagir 54.Gulam Mustafa Khan, S/o Sri Dastagir Khan 55.M.Pumar;handra Rao, S/o M'Venkat Rao 56.Smt. M.Ehavani, W/o Sudhakar 57.D.Venkal:eswara Rao, S/o Lakshaman Rao 58.V.Gangadhar, S/o V.Veera SwamY 59.Smt. D.Amrutha Vahini, Wo Dr'Prabhakar Rao 60"Smt. B.Chandra, W/o B'Chandra Sekhar Rao 61.Smt. P.J;alamma, W/o P'Elialavantha Rao 62.Smt. Y.Jmuna, W/o Sri Pennidhi Rao

63.Smt.M.VenkataLakshmi,W/oSriVenkateswaraRao 64. R.Nageswara Rao, S/o Raghavaiah 65.Smt. G.Flatna Kumari, Wo R'amesh 66. Gulam l-lafeezuddin, S/o Late G,Nizamuddin 67. B.V.B.N. Kutumba Rao, S/o Sri Narsaiah 68.Smt. Anila Kumari, W/o Ajay Kumar 69. Smt..S.\f .Ramana, W/o Lakshamaiah 70. M.Chanrlra Sekhar Rao, S/o Late Narsing Rao 71.Smt. Srilatha, W/o Chandra Sekhar Rao 72.Smt. No'lrunnisa Begum, W/o Mohd' Usman Ahmed 73.Syed Farooq Nayeem, S/o Late Saleem T4.K.Nagerrdra Babu, S/o Benarjee 75. Sharat Elabu, S/o P.Satyanarayana 76. B.Vijaya Bhaskar, S/o Satynarayana 77. K.Gowri Shankar, S/o E-Chandraiah 78. E.Bhaskar Rao, S/o Sri Gown Shankar 135

79.Smt. N.Laltha, Wo Sri Raghavender 80.Smt. N.Sobha Rani, Wo Vijaya Kumar '81.Smt. Padmaja Naidu, Wo Prabhakar Rao 82.V.S.V.Narsimha Reddy, S/o Anantha Reddy ' 83.Srt. Usha Rani, W/o Leander Vowels 84. Smt. SaniYa Rani, Wo P.L'M'ReddY 85.Smt. N.Pavani Reddy, W/o Anil Kumar Mote 86.Smt. Anil Kuma Mote, W/o Anil Kumar Mote ST.Settupalli Suresh, S/o Late Koteswara Rao SS.Surapuneni Ajay Kumar' S/o S'Atchutha Ramaiah Sg.Chandolu Satyanarayana' S/o Venkateswaru g0.Aravapalli Sambasiva Siva Rao, S/o Late Venkateswarlu . 91.Smt.'Aravapalli Vijay Kumari, W/o Sambasiva Rao ',: 92.Smt. Ellina Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o E'Perasad 93.Smt. Nadimpalli Madhavi, W/o E'Prasad' 94.Smt. Nadimpalli Sarjini, W/o N'V'R'K Raju ': 95.Smt. Kunapuraiu Padrnavahi' W/o KSRK Varma ,i 96.Krnapuraju Siva Rania Krishna Varma, S/o K.V.S.S.N RaiU ' gT.GatizahtiVeera Venkata Ram Prasad, S/o Late surya Prakash Rao gS.Makkena Brahmaiah' S/o Late Ankanna 99. Smt.Kaantaman ni S hya m alal Devi, w/o A-Suryanarayana 100. Smt. Muddapati Anupanra' W/o tvl'surendra l0l.MedasaniRajendraPrasarl'S/oLateM.Subbaiah lo2.Smt.MusunuiJyothinlal.D/otr/.V.KrishnaRao l03.KaplsathalmSundaraChari,S/oLateK.RajagopalaChari 104. Chintagunta Bhaskara Reddy' S/o C'Bala Reddy ,[05.SunkaraSambaSivaRao'S/oS.MadhjusunaRao

106. Smt. J.Jhansi, W/o J Rama Krishna 1O7.Smt. A.Sai Nandana, D/o A Jaya Prakash 108. Pandari Jaya Deepthi, S/o P S'Pulla Rao m 109. Sri Sabbineni Sowri Raju' S/o S'Ananthaiah 110. Smt. B.Bagyamma, W/o Late B'Kotaiali 111. Smt. Baby Sarojini, W/o Nageswara Rao 136

112. KolliVenkata Ravindra Nath' S/o [-ate K'V't(ishna 113. Smt. Dtrgginaelsamyuktha' D/o D'Surya Prakash Rao 1 14. Smt. Dttwuri Venkata Subba Laxmi' Wo D'V'S'Sanna 115. Guttuparlli Raiu, S/o Venkatesh 1 1 6. Smt. Ravuri TaraQayarnma'.Wo' R'Venkateswara Rao 117. Smt. R Venkateswaraflao; S/o R'M'C'V'Prasada Rao 118. Smt. Madduri Kamala' Wo Dr' M'Veera Raghava Reddy 119. Madduri Mahesh, S/o Dr' M'Veera Raghava Reddy 120. Madduri Hari, S/o Dr' M'Veera Raghava Reddy 121 . Smt. Yalagadda MjayaLakshmi' W/o Y'Pooma Chandra Rao 122. Jampala Pramod Krishna' S/o J'Radha Krishna Murthy 123. Puftagunta Ravi, S/o P'Venkateswarlu 124. Sumktr Rangaiah, S/o Aswadhamaiah 1 25. Vegictrarla Srinivasulu' S/o V'Narayanaiah 126. Chintargunta Narsimha Reddy' S/o Ch'sudhakar Reddy 127. Gonda Nageswara Rao, S/o G'Basava Punnaiah 128. Smt- l\nanda Charita' Wo Venu Babu 129. Smt- l(ota Pitchamma' Wo K'Venkata Reddy 130. Kabh:rmpatiVenkata Krishna' S/o Radha Krishna Murthy 131. Smt.F'eri Suidha, Wo P'Bala Murali Krishna 132. Smt.Ohava Samraiya Sree' Wo B'S'V'Prasad 133. Smt.f)adminiKedari Gowri' W/o B'Rajendra Prasad 134 Smt. Adusumilli Sandhya Sree' Wlo A'V'SubbaRao 135 Jagtatpu Raaieswara Rao' S/o J'M'Rao 136. Smt. ponnapaili Lakshmi, wo p.Subrarnanyeswara Rao l3T.PedcliVenuGopal'S7oP'ChalapathiRao 138. Smt-Gogineni Ratna Kumari' Wo G'Ramesh 139. Smt.Tummavala Bhavya' W/o T'Gopi Krishna i40. Dr- A-Gopinath, S/o'Chandra Mouli 141 . Smt K.Tulasi, Wo K'sudhakar 142. Smt A.Rama Devi, W/o A'Venkateswarlu 143. Smt. V.Sri Lakshmi' Wo V'suresh Babu 144. Koneru Satyanarayana' S/o K'sundar Ramaiah 137

145. S.Ajay Kumar, S/o S.Atchutharamaiah 12t6. Gogineni Radha Krishna, S/o V 147. Smt. Kanakala Vijaya Lakshmi, Wo Late Veera 148. Smt. Alturi Charitha, S/o A.S.M.Raju 1 49. Sri. A.V.M.Raju, S/o .A.V.N.Raju l50. Uppalapati Siva Rama Raju, S/o U.V.Rama Raiu 151. Smt.lnampudi Gowri, Wo l.Rama Krishna 152. Smt. Aisha Khatoon, Wo Ahmed Abdul Haleem 153. Sheel Madhusudhan, S/o Shankar Rao 154. Smt. N.Prasanna, Wo Amarender 155. Ungarala V.V.N.Krishna Rao, S/o Late U'P. Swamy 156. Smt. Yartagadda Seetha Mahalakshmi, W/o Y'Krishna Rao 157. Smt. Chowdavaram Jhansi Rani, Wo M.S.T.Rami Reddy 158. Smt. M.Manorama, Wo M.Krishna Reddy 159. T.Tara Susheela Kumar, Wo Late Upendra Gupta 160. Smt. B.Jayha Gopi, W/o B.Kameswara Rao 161. Smt. Yalamanchili Sri Kumari, W/o Bhagiratha 162. Smt. lnampudi Gowri, Wo l.Rama Krishna 163. Smt. Asha Khatoon, Wo Ahmed Abdul Haleem 164. Sheel Madhusudan, S/o Shankara Rao '165. Smt. N.Prasanna, W/o Amarinder 166. Smt. Lingala Seetha Lakshmi, Wo Y.Krishna Rao 167. Smt. Chowdavaram Jhansi Rani, Wo MST Rami Reddy 168. Durgala Edaiah, Sio D.SamaYa

169. T.Leela Prasad, S/o T.V.Anjaneyulu 170. Smt. Nukala Radhika Reddy, W/o N.Sridhar Reddy 171. Smt. Raoot Sarala, W/o Krishna Narayana Raoot 172. Sunkara Harshitha, D/o Prameela

173. Smt. Shankar, S/o Harischandra 174. Smt. Kondapani Naga Raja Lakshmi Kumari, Wo K'Krishna Rao 175. R.Siva Rami Reddy, S/o Gyrivi Reddy

176. J.Narendra Babu, S/o J.M.Dass 177. Kaza Jayaprakash, S/o K.Leela Dhara Rao 138

178. Chalicham Nageswara R'ao, S/o Ch'Seshaiah '179. Kana Suresh Babu, S/o K'Ramaiah 1 80. K.Viiay:rKumar, S/o K't(otaiah 1 81 . Smt. M;aella Rajani KurnaG W. /o Viya Kumar 182. Smt. Puligadda Vydehi, Wo Siva Rama Kumar 1 83. Smt. G'rllapalli lndu'Madhavi; rWVo G'Rama Mohan 184. Smt. Nirmala Reddy; Wo S'Obtrl Reddy 185. Smt. Ch.Uma Rani, Wo C'N' Kesava Chand 186. K.Sury;r Rao, S/o'Late K'Venkata Subba Rao 1 87. G.Satyanarayana, 9o Late Venkata Subbanna 188. Chagarlalmudi Krishna, S/o C'Madhusudhan Rao 189. Makam Subrarneswara Setty' S/o Chayanna Setty 190. Smt. Kesulawada lr'atha, Wo G'Krishna Rao 191 . Palakolanu Narayan Reddy, S/o P'V'Subba Reddy 192. Obbineni Ramaniey'tlu Reddy' Slo Jaya Rama Reddv 193. Smt. Palakolau Sowbhagyanrma' Wo P'Narayana Reddv 194. Smt lsanaka Rama Krishna Reddy' Wo Venku Reddv 1 95. N.srinivas Chakrdvarthy' S/o Late N.Krishna MurthY 196. K.Sudhir Kumar, S/o K'Fandu ress of Respondents No. 27 Hyderabad. )

197. A.Srilaltha to 197 i:; Cleo 198 rd . Ashok Babu, No. B usiness, R/o. Plot S/o. Late 143, Road No. 72, J PERC.O., DT.07/01 12022lNlA 1t2o22\ (R198 ls . Aqed 57 Years. Occ Hill-s. Hyderabad. R198 llvlPL ED AS PERC.O., 8T.13/1 112024VlDE lA.No 1/2022 lN cRP.1588/2017 )

199. MV. Subba 301, Venkatadri Gachi b<lwli Cross S/o. ut 39 vears, Rl/o. Flat No. nd H.P.. Petrol Bunk, ,*"?J.i\Jl,t5fllfr* -,H'i{,? -ts5's#ssiJff t[:siil,i8:fl 333,!"3" ]"""' Hyderalrad. S/o. G.R. Dharma ReddY, . Plot No.48, Flat No. 10 201 . G. Ramakrishna Occ Software E Colony KukatPallY, Hyderabad. Nagar, OPP 202. Smt. '/empati Sailaja, Wo' A' Chaitanya-Srinivasa Aoed about 42 vears' occ Private Employee, ffi: FGt li;;6i' e'R tvlansion-' Goutami Enclave' #i;i. ;i b;A;i (oaci, Kothasuda, Hvderabad Aoed about 37 1 ."Veera Towe years, rs, Jaya 139

203. Smt. Beesam Shobha Rani, Wo. B. Ram Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No. 1 - 4 - 134lNBl3, Kamala l{ehru Colony, Mahabubnagar District.

204. Smt. Abburi Vani, Wo. A. Venkata Ramana Naidu, Aged about 54 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No. 11114, Sn Ram Nagar Colony, Kondapur, Srilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

205. Smt. L. Mshnu Chandana, Wo. N. Dheeraj Reddy, Occ Employee, Fi/o. H,No. 12 - 10 - 769, Flat No. 301 Namala Gundu, Sectnderabad. Aged about 40 years, , Shreya Homes,

206. Smt. Muppisetti Bindu Ram, Wo. Naveen Alajangi, Aged 34 years, Occ Housewife,.Fi/o. H.No. 13 - 6 - 433/8, Nethaji Nagar, Ring Road, Mehdipatnam, Golconda,Hyderabad.

207. T. Sudhir Reddy, S/o. T. Lakhma Reddy, {ged 48 years, Occ Medical Doctot Rl/o. PlotNo.96, Vinayaka Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad.

208. Smt. Nukala Jyothi, Wo. N. Ramachandra Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ Housewife,-R/o. H.No. 1 - I - 70A3Z61 , Padma Colony, Nallakunta, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

209. N. Narasimha Reddy, S/o. N. Venkata Reddy, Aged about 66 ye Business, Ri/o. H.No- 1 -7 - 59, JSM Colony, Street No. 8, Habsig Hyderabad. ars, Occ uda, (R199 to R209 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER C.O., dt.2411212024 vide lA.No \ tzozc in cRP. 1 s88/2ol 7) RESPONDENTS

1.A. NO: 3 OF 2017(CR PMP. NO: 2104OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to alienate the land property Ac. 37-16 guntas in Sy.No. 51, 52, 53 and Acrs. 73{3 Guntas in Sy.No. 37.40,42 to 45 situated at Gachibowli village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District pending disposal of the CRP. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. N SAIDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.14 : SRI D. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.85 & 86 : SRI K. DEVENDER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR APPEALS 140 1882 7 petition under section 91 0f A.p (r.A)_Tenancv and Agricultural Lands Act' *lrwliL*,*l*ffiTl*:'a;l'.'"rurru;,"r.NoF2/5885/2013' Between: "=i'l**n*"o6,lt.nf,,!_..n"8*nl[Bl;?,1*]n%"j.e',.f; Hl"L'rJ,i,lfr Cinga Feddy District' ".?"i ,SXSS:-:,S,ry E5&,gi;i[$ft:*l%"S.ft lSll'o3,,'r"ffi;"?ff tlfJlt"fi #.i; District. .R{1,*its|l3$l,3l'c."r3gf i,X'ffi:':[]i',#r3[?T"'r',ffi if;'offi Sg""*'J,l; -n*lllUp;if,hf'f::[,."r.t,f""ff '1],',],%:'#:ix!#'J'ff ti"""o"i District-

5.Khanamet,BikshapathiS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged43yrs.' 6. Khananret Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 44 yrs'' 7. Khanamet Maltesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs'' Petitioners 5 to 7 are Agricufturists' R/o H'No'1-35' Gachibowli' RangareddY District. LRs or the deceased P4 as per Calt':tfl.Alf,f,lfr$3T3ir6"d,t "= PETlrloNERs AND Gagdish S/o' Kaffa lsRrNrvASKArrA,BltJffi 3,::Btil*7;R#'fr .oLt#"#3',S#: 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer' Aftapur' R'R' District' '9ft :33331iiru'"tJ"u"i["ffi 3'^']lPtrfrTR'JlTi#,J*!l'*"1'38/1'Gachibowri No t -38/ 1' G achibow' ' gn:8: 53illl&fl3;llil"#*?T"tgHH5Hi:#.";J '3131{3'fi ;:lif,l";,S??"%""tJt"J}'tlBi#iGachibowriVirrase' . ysXft;i"i11i, il"';111i#"*Jlt1lhfr"3,1?:i'"'re' ' Ysl,*,[ffix[,'rt^i"i,l3:: Hi;J:[1!?i #"lricurture' t g3,lfii Hs'r?i,',ii3;l?li#"i1?t1J3"3,$flli''ture' Rr/o GachibowriVirrage' Fr/o Gachibowrivirrase' R/o Gachibowrivirrase' r4l 3liiiii""i"*dtiv Minad Ransa Reddv District' g. Ahmed wazeer, s/o. late Khasim 4liq99 Agriculture, Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' w' l0.Manikonda Yadaian, s/q_b!e frrlanikondq Kondaiah Aoed 52 vears' occ As ricu ltu re nrol fr].ibli -dril d iltiii,-,;irl i, Sfiiil& m pL t t v na n g a Red d v District. "B:,un"liHill'31?il,ffi iffi Bt'X833ft S*'"ff'r:'*l?u'3"??ifl lsliH*o" 12.Mr.Babaiah, Slo; hfe"B--lle tingaiah Og? Agriculture, Rl/o' Gachibowli Village' ' -' Sbtiiin'iirnpini Mandal Ranga Reddv District' " 3g,.1g6"*3;6t"n?fi hip3fif11 8tr is8lil:{"' 14.Smt. Santamma, wo. |de Balaiahocc-Agriculture, Fl/o' Gachibowli village' ' -' iiii ns;rir=iii iv-frnandal Ranga Redd v Distri ct 15.Gadda Yettaiah, s/o. Gadda Veeraiah, o-cc4gr!9ulture, R/o' Gachibowli ' "' Viii;d;,'#ilfis;tripit[' Minoal, Ransa Reddv District' 16. Gadda Narsimha, s/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah occ Agriculture' R/o' Gachibowli ' "' R/o G ach i bowr i Vi r r as e' 5 " lT.G.MadigaPentaiah,S/q'late.Vceraiah'9"g.ngj'."ulture'Ri'/o'Gachibowli V', ti;; ;, SHiin's;mpaliv-Mand al Ra nsa Red d v District' '' Virrrgt]'8"r1'oigfiliifuii ManOal, Ransa Reddy District ,uR[l,,9i,'ffi H?.][,e*Pi.i,SI3iSfl ;$"?ffi :l'f R^I?i:]3i"U"#;S]',]" District. 1g. G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 41 .years. occ Agriculture R/o' '- il.N-oli-,i,i, alJrii;6fii'fiiiil.;'B;lild;;palivMandal Raisa Reddv Distriut' 20.G. Suresh, S/o. G. Shankar4g".q abot4 39.years' Occ Agricutl{" ru9 H No.2-62 2t;i2i:d#hi#difiiiff"] s;rilins'*palIv Mlnda| Ransa Reddv District. 2lGShivaKulnar,$/o.-G..-$.h""*3:tffi3r*;J,1r'il#3::S,'&3tdt"JlY'S'Y,h. - H.ruo.t -44, Gachibowli Mllage' 22.Smt.G.Susheela,[/9.G..Kristrna{g"9.about45years'occHousewife Rl./o. H.No.r+2I6"'dfri;;,ti''Vii6b;,'S""rilingimpatti Mandal Ransa Reddv District.

23.G.Sanleeva,S/9.-G.tSt'ghnaAgedabout32-years'OccAqricultureR/o' H. No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Mllage, B!}ldgu*pirly tr4a nO a I Ranga Reddv District'

24.O.Sanieeva, S/o. G' l(ris!-na Aged about 32 years' Occ Aqriculture Rl/o' H. No. i -44, Gachibowli Vitlage, SJril];G;"p"ilt M and a I Ra ng a Reddv D istrict' "fi T1;?:foitXtir|ffia?r}gi[lSflff'3ffJi'ir'"l3il?'?:?HH'""#1"#i;" 26.G. Jaipal, s/o, G.._ $ishE 4.g"d about 27.years, Occ Aqriculture Ri/o' H'No'1- 44, Gachibowti Vilage, SeriUniaf i'JiV rvrinJ u t Ra ng a Reddv D i strict' 27.G.Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna Aged about 25 years- occ Aoriculture R/o' H. No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village,"deiffi;ft ;ify M'a nd at Ring a Reddv District' 142 "?trA3ffi :*Hf.ff "o,",n*. Ril lai,ftB iFSrS,# ,il;yfri"[H,B"1lf'€:.18[tfifr ,un.f.t5?1"'JS6$ff iXiLif *ft i.tg"?3"',ir"ft 29.Spl. Gr. Dy. Collecfor@ RDO, Raiendranagar Divisbn 30.Authorized Officer, LandrReforms' Collectorate' Hyderabad ., 32.V. Raiendra. Prasad, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 53 years; occ Business' R/o' *' 33.Laxman Prasad, S/o' S-atya.narayana Ri/o' Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally --'ruiiiaat Ranga Reddy District' 34. Surender, S/o. B Suryanarayana Rl/o'.FlaI No'203' Tarakararna Eatates "-';l!"o.i-Iilslzi'rq.-aifu atpura,Hyderabad-27 i i9.3Cr, Srnathnasar, HYderabad occ House wire .u,Xi"::f,:l 36.Mrs. V. tJdayini' W/o' V' Sudhakar-Aged.about 52 years' Om House wife R/o' * R3i,a Yic[S;ff:,ifi3?"#30-fr0:* ii:ffi 1 bi6-A i'ti,ii ruth i n agal' Yo u sufs uta Hvderabad' 53 vears' occ Business "'Ui,S,Hj,i"SJi:sgi,?il,"'P",5ft iLi[:f iv"tg]i3:3ll,fi J3?5a3* 38.K. Radha Krishna Murthy,S/o' K.N. Sa.StryAggd about.7o years, occ Rtd. ""' LH;ti,tL' H6. An Jna i'i'a'gai Coionv' rnairat6bad' Hvderabad' 39.P.V.S.R.. Das, S/o. V'P' Subba Rao Ri'/o' 27OG-1' Road No'11' Jubilee Hills' HYderab'ad'- *R$l?_rill5#f irEi;'"il;;i;wers, Adarshnagar' Hvderabad' '{,1..8f,i."""d,"I,'.}:X6E?!E'r"r"fgg,'&3#3i3#S4," 41 .M/ s. Kastopa Corporation' Rep' by [s M:Dj9ri Anil Kuniar R Kamdar Fi/o' 5-8- -' Bi,ifiFi;il kl'irt iJi"i, 51-'iioir noao' Nampallv' Hvderabad' 42.Srnt. CFl. Prameela, Wo. CH..V.S.9..N. Raju Aged about 49 years, occ Housewife nyo. H.r'lo.a'--2-otiilefi' Noornalar' Road No'10 Banjara Hills' HYderabad 43.Smt. Cl''. Preethi, D/o Ch V'S S N Raiu Aged.about 26 yeaE'Rep' by her : r;tl;;;a bpA noroert't.v.S.s.N' Bdjrl R7o' H'No'8-2-601/B/1' Noomasar' 44.Smt. Deepika Chava, D/o Hanumantha Rao Wo' Sharath Babu' aged about 31 vears H.No.8_2_6aa]iit\z'ticltlii. Durga Temple Lane Road No.12' e#j"o Hills, HYderabad -34 ii;; N;10 .-" Banjara Hills, Hvderabad' 45fi itJi:?1ili,'ffitl3fl :?;xg'i;l?H:",ltli,:fi ,"i.?::i:3:J"arsR/o 46.Smt. Ctrava Hymavathi' W/o' Sri Chava China Veerabhadraiah Aged about 82 vears R/o.. H No . 1 -7:i'lCopp cttiitanya School chaitanyapuri' [{yderabad. -' ffi1d1'-H;ia rlJ.ab Jubilee Hills' Hvderabad - e6' 47.Chava:irinivas, S/o. Chava Hanuniantha'Raq - ^^qed about 36 years Fl/o' Plot 743

48.Smt. GH. Bhanumathi, Wlo. CH. Shivaji R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Distrbt.

49.Smt. CH. K. Usha Rani, D/o. K.S.K, Mrrythy .R/o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Reddy District. .Ranga

50.Dr. K. Manmohan Reddy, S/o. K. Venkat Reddy Aged 65 years, Occ Doctor R/o. H.No.2-4-925, NimbotiAdda . Kachiguda, Hyderabad-

51.K. Praveen Kumar Reddy, S/o. K: Shankar Reddy R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

52.Smt. G. Viiaya Lakshmi, Wo. C. Ghandra Mouli RI/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilinganipally Mandal Ranga Reddy District-

53.SMt. T. Padma, Wo. T. Vijaya KumarAged 49 years, Occ Household R/ o- H. No. 1 1 -1 -1 1 2, Bapunagal, Saroomaga r, Hyd erabad.

54.Smt. T. Padma, Wo. VUay KumarAged 49 years, Occ Household R/o. H. No. 1 1 -1 -1 12, Bapundgar, Saroomagar, Hyd e ra bad

55.Smt. T. Swama, Wo. T. Virupaksha Aged 49 years, Occ Household R/o. H. No. 1 1 -1 -1 12, Bapunagar, Saroomagar, Hyd e rabad.

56.Smt. V. Shankuntala, Wo, Muralidhar Rao Aged 56 years., Occ Househoid R/o. H.M .11-1-112, Bapunagar, Saroomagar, Hyderabad.

57.A. Sarathchandra, S/o. A. Anjaiah Aged 42years, Occ Business R/o. H. No. 1 1 -1 -1 12, Bapunagar, Saroomagar, Hyd erabad

58.Smt. B. Sangeetha, Wo. Late B. Ramesh Ageq p0. years,.Occ Household - - R/o. H.No.li-t-1t2, Bapunagar, Saroomagar, Hyderabad.

59.Smt. Hameeda Begum, Wo. Gulam Dastagir R/o. GachibowliVillage' Serilingampally Mahdal Ranga Reddy District-

60.Gulam Manstafa Khan, S/o. Dastagiri Khan R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 61 . M. Pumachandra Rao, S/o. M. Venkat Rao R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District.

62.Smt. M. Bhavani, Wo. Sudhakar R/o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga ReddY District.

63.D. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Sri Lakshmana Rao R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy' District.

64.V. Gangadhar Employee Ri/o Hyderabad. Rao, S/o. V. Veera Swamy Aged about 71 years, Occ Retd . H.No. 1 2-2;7}gl0l87, Padmahabhanagar Mehd i patna m,

65.Smt. D. Amrutha Vahini, Wo. Dr. Prabhakar Rao R/o. Gachibowli Viilage' Serilingampally Mandal . Ranga Reddy District'

66.Smt. B. Chandana, W/o. B. Chandra Shekar Rao RL/o. Gachibowli Vtllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

67.Smt. P. Jayamma, Wo P. Balavantha Rao R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serili nga m-pally Mandal Ranga Reddy District - 144 *'ffij##i$#dn"".;i'"dly.[ffii'i.'nf3':BlfiftEa?Eli'"t'Hlli;*" 6e-.smr M. Venkata Lak?h1#J:i ' Village, :Serilingampally FI"XT[Al%"XBilEffo R/o- Gactrhowr

70.R. Naqesu/ara Rao' S/o'. Raghavaiah Fi/o ' Gachibowli Mllage; Serilingampally ''' M'anOIt' nanga Reddy District' R/o, Gachibovrili VIIEEE; Sedlingarnpally Ranga Reddy District'

71.Smt. G. Ratna Kumari,-Wo' Ramesh ' ''t|in'Oif 72.Gulam t{afeezuddin, S/o' Late Q' Nizamuddin FUo' Gachibowli Mllage' ''' s;riii"ililiiri urinb at Ransa Reddv District' 73.B.V.B.V.N.P. Kutumba Rao, S/o' Narsa-iah Rlo"Gachibowli Mtlage' ' "' 5*1i,id,il;iriv-Ma noat Ransa Reddv District' ' 'o 8!L\' [ #E:ifi, [^Tl3l i h'jxnl'tr"0i]' 6r"il& - - - W/o. Aiav Kumar Rl/o' Gachibowli Mllage'

75.Smt.S..y'.Rarnana,W/o.LakshmaiahRl/o.GachibowliMllage,serilingampally '-'MinOat Ranga ReddY District' ,u $,3113!S8731i,1,[,53:r.l'i;Hf"S"]ffi i8fl ,iiiotP"f;"3l vearc' occ ,r.3gl,y;,i',1,,x,&.y3.y,%1il:;1i:lii1.#f#7vears,occ*ousehordFr/o' 78.Smt. Noorunni.sa Begum' W/o'Mohd U-smanAhmed FUo' Gabhibowli Village' i" Ellliii"ii'"'"tiirrry rr,tinott Ransa Reddv District' 79.Sved Farooq Nayeem. S/o -S.ye.d ' -'HiJ. 80.K. Naq,:ndra Babu, S/o. Beneriee Fl/o Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally --'ManOi Ranga ReddY District' Yousuf Aged about 49 years' Occ Business Cai"in"lar' Amberpet' Hvderabad' \ Manaat Ranga ReddY District' Sl.SharathBabu,S/o.P,satyanarayanaRl/o.GachibowliVillage,Serilingampally - " 82.8. ViiaYa Bhaskar, S/o. Saryanaray.a.naflg, Gachibowli Mllage' *' Sbririitii* pa riv rtlti no at Ra nga Reddv District'

83.K. Govrrri Shankar, S/o. C Chandraiah Fl/o'.Gachibowli Village' ""' sliii"iir.pairv rrrr'a no at Ranga Reddv District' 84. E. Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Sri Gowri Shankar.Rl/o' Gachibowli Mltage' *' StirlL]iirnpr'iiv irai nrt at Ranga Redd v District'

85.Smt. N. Lalitha' W/o. Sri Raghavende4r Rl/o' Gachibowli Mltage' '"' Si]iiii"i j Jfr pirfi r,ii, no at Ranla Reddv District' 86.Smt. N. Shoba Rani, Wo' Vijaya Kumar.Rl/rc' Gachibowli Village' "" Sljliiin,;#iirrv'rrltin'oat Ranla Reoov District' 87.Smt. F'admaia Naidu' W/o' Prabhakar Bgq fl.o Gachibowli Mllage' "' Sliiiii"rrrp;iiv Mandal Ranga Reddv District' 88.V.S.V. Narsimha Reddy, S/o A' Ana.ntha Reddy R/o' Gachibowli Village' * s;;ilr#;pittv Mandai Ranga Reddv Ditrict' r45

89.Smt. Usha Rani, Wo. LeanderVowels R/o. Gabhibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ftanga Reddy District.

90.Smt. Sandhya Rani, D/o. P.L. M. Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy R/o. Gachibowti Mllage,

91.Smt. N. Pavani Seriligampally Madal Wo Anil Kumar Mote R/o Gachibowli Mllage Reddy District.

92.Sri Anil Kumar Mote, S/o. Late M. Uppal Reddy R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

93.Settupalli Suresh, S/o. Late Koteshwar Rao R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

94.Surapaneni Ajay Kumar, S/o. S. Atchutha Ramaiah Aged 41 years, Occ Software Engineer Rt/o. Plot No.201 Flat No.101, Shankuntala Sadan Street No.25, Telecom Nagar Ext., Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032.

95.Chandolu Business R/o. Plot , S/o. Venkateswa .203, Chruva ll, Main rlu Aged about 56 years, Occ Road, Yousufguda, Hyderabad.

96.Aravapalli Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Late Venkateswara Rao Aged about 67 years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o. Plot No.164, RTC Colony, Vijayawada-8. 9T.Aravapalli Vijay Kumari, Wo. Sambasiva Rao Aged about 59 years, Occ Housewife FUo. Plot No.164, RTC Colony, Vrjayawada-8.

98.Ellina Vijaya Lakshmi, W.o. E. Prasad Aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife R/o. Flat No.332, Vynateya Apartments , Shyamalangar, Rajmundry, East Godavari - 533 103

99.Nadimpalli Madhavi, Wo. N. Venkatapathi Raju Housewife, R/o. H. No.27-8-3 1 /1, Srirampuram, District. 100. Nadi Occ District. iSa Rl/o rojani Devi, Wo. N.V.R.K. Raju Aged about 40 years, 27 -8-31 I 1, S ri rampuram, Bhimavaram, West Godavari Aged about 46 years, Occ Bhimavaram, West Godavari 10't. Occ Housewife, District.

102. about 45 years, Bhimavaram, W Padmavthi, W/o. K.S.R.K. Varma Aged about 44 years, . 27-8-3111 , Srirampuram, Bhimavaram, West Godavari Siva Rama Krishna Varma, S/o. K.V.S.S.N. Raju Aged Pvt. Employee R/o. 27€-3111, Srira mpuram est Godavari District.

103. Gatiganti Veera Venkataram Prasad, S/o. Late G. Surya Prakasha Rao, Aged about 48 years, Occ Engineer, Rl/o. M. Sadasavi Rao, Plot No.7, Vasanta Emerald Gardens, Madhapur, l.lyderabad.

104. Makkena Brammaiah, S/o. late M.Ankamma, Aged about 56 years, , Fi/o.Flat No.201, Sai Durga Towers, H.No.7 -1-6211291, Occ Pvt. S.R. Nagar, 105. Kantamaneni Syamaladevi, Wo. A. years, Occ Housewife, Ri/o. Plot No.62, Balari Hyderabad. arayana n about 69, , Aged Colony Erragadda, 146 ,ou*o,""#l{tLll6i:R]$?"ll'i;#,.3["P81ffi 'rfl:?'3ts.T3:{:ft fd$: "1n::r{.#;is*8"ffi$i"ffif ,fiiih'HF""v:fi ffi :'?HIu' to96** jf BB$l,T-jIlP,y ft I'',Wf #^";,SXliHfl *11,$P.Si3J,""o' HYderabad - 45' "i,"*,gi,1p::a:"iry65;:L:H':9te!:hmiffi',"fil3tl"'*'f, li'lP*'on'' "'tr,=:fi }$i?il*1|fT.515:,',11i13.?#?e$3$f Ass[s:?a':f Bxf; 111,bo,t.1':rrg3,=:u?"'dl,x[3ii,t'{l;f;:,idf,']ts3,Hi[?l,s63it1?ir, '1"' E[iii"'i ni[rt", (hammam District' ,, {"*_l,jfn'f,fl;j,W?lSBllfii,3F,.o0"3T*'1 vears' occ Doctor R/o "1o,""$*3p3lP?ll'*3',f;tJ3ltTfrf:*'1ffi$n?H$'19tr18-?r ,'oa*J,To€,:*111i:"d5'ff 113,?;,i"*iff0";$S#,iffi XglI8fl 3:o* 53 vears' occ *'1,",""it3,0&T1I ??u:'61H ,]j3,? 'f,:lli3f,1t$'"*'?Tyt Hyderabad - 74 vs2rs, ()cc Doctor' l- ( 'PiTe-m' Visa*'apatn am - 1 3 "ui.,* jln.",nfi ,fl 'fi :1ft J'&',i1ft :#13',91i:Bgfr:Sj[91'Iie5a3"T ,,r"ou""Jli,B,"I/".831,fu Yf J"1'.'i,iittl3"*t3#riP$'3lfr1f l?33; 1 1 B rlorra:e g-aB,Tililt iil3'|i ?$}f 'eA,Y;*rl1lfli*6fi ".9.1"-'1,* 1 1 e. ) uss i naei t *llH'I'* 3'foi r:X#l f-EiB:tff 8tf"no"ff 3H""t vears. 'Jcc Doctor, Ktt il/#rA;;lly' Secunderabad-26' 12o- Duwuri Venka'fu::B:f lffTl V!";3J"t"r:iflft#3lo"9B* Years, Occ Housewttt *"1' t'L.r,o,8""'j'd3i",T1YsiJir,"'"1€:?::"f affi P'lJfi ':|'l;?ii'-ffi ", "^,..33:il'" 'Piniatrrtt,, HYderabad - 82' J$fl,?31 try?t I',fr ;*"Y""i5x)3il?ffi'Hfu ISFH[""$'',u td"". * t 147 Fitildsutt' HYderabad - 82' "'*"o.8Je[l5l?"Slffi X6'?"t#i*?h535fl '*Lif fl"3tsS" '';"--3*frTl$fi ,f #1ft RlyJ?"'ti'f *?H[111*'H'if'U1u ,ru;".,".#o,*:#ilff :;,'A?;*fi .,[X-3:56#,',f EF"*i',-:fl Sdaboutzt4 Hyderabad - 82. 5-orir-diig uoa'HYd erabad - 82' ,,uo"",'Y8$6;XS:'#SB1,IaYS$S#1fl ?[itr3*#gtfi'$,T"I""-' H$erabad - 82'

127. Yarlagadda Viiaya Lakshmi' W/o' Y-.Pooma Chandra Rao' Aged about lto'"nagar' SllL Campus Post' sl vears. o"c nou""*'€,-fiLl'ii'it6'q:g' Fi6vinit a, Khammam District' l2B.JamparaPramogrlH:li,g',%3iilglft,HrTiiH:H;,1fl i$ 51 Years, Occ Housewl "na,..":slfi P.:il"$:;:i:J?rZ6Y?,{Z\?H?1Y:tfl?1#3,5"eJffi:a:* ,.ono*rr"#ol1B3lfl"1'3i,'*'i3;1RY"1fl ,il?f, if, li"fr%itffi $,'n?,[???;3,?*t 1'1i",a.J;fl '"331*ip31r1 MeiiiPatnam' HYderabad' j{?-Y;!snli,il^iX#""f SlTevears'occ 'a!fi ,.r",,",BlB,SlH?r,3#tT'S,i"5l&t'ii:tf nfi ffi ii,"J,t[lfl i:'A13lr:'^'#l tr'a6ir, t-tvo"trbad - 500 028' 1 33. Gond.a Nag esw:ffi Years, Occ Agriculture Xffi -tJ"i f ,?33?l':f"Y'UHF}' ff,'#.H,:t"tft *"'"' "%."",181'SE*3,3ff":Ai,i3i,T|1iY1";&Y3:1i,3fi".1,'^f#38?f*'fi ,.u*,""*1[S]ai;l$SnT:,i,[Jl; ["X"i$,Ifr fl,ri Oif 'eii'l*"'Bvears' ,.u;oou,l...i;5[:8,:""83f ,i1ifi i]if :flfi##:8fi [Eli6']Ltt'dffi :3 f,iai,"t b;i*v' khairatabad' H vd erabad' ,.ri,o,."L?S, S#l nB,IJBnfi kniiratauao, HYderabad' nBi'alH S8,IB:ll3hf #^H$"f"I338"?: ResidencY' Dharam h "uq"".ffi &utli,ffi #j"*]fl H':ltt'q*l?3fi 1 3e. Bodi.Padmini.K:Rru:"ll,:l-y""r$ifi ?ii',[35f,,?'4fl:1 3:ff"1?i. #fff E'nif,l'"'"' Years, Occ Housewltt I r48 "0o""rs,1,5#81'lrT."fi',.?f,-Ei;ui"-fr nindineoov Distria - 5oo o5o' x,ti'"T.H#:3&ii"$""1r[if,:' loto*r'3$tsi'#lszH:i#3"i0?flo*;[Et&'fi9*5H'$'u3"f;.'XE;3ffi o 3f;33? ,oo*o,."$,,i3,ffi 'o';"^o,BI'IiisSxLh#:HHH,,i;5-.i385"-?11tri3ffi,o3an'"ron?,rt1u' 143. Peddi Venugopal, S/o' P' Chalapathi $9o' Aoed about 46 vears' Occ Business,. R/o. Ftat r.ro.ib"d,"rii"rl-eiiiies, kawri-Hills, Jubilee Hills, HYderab;rd - 500 033' ::EeTR5ffi tffi "?;H$:*#fl,fr ""gi,**:'"Jfr P':?ffi rB'i:h:.38''i,llH:"iblfl *fi8'#!:3-l??R' Colony, tfukatpally' Hyderabao - /z' ouro,,"Ililti:: AmeerPet, HYderabad' ' 146. Dr. A- Gopinath, S/o' A' Chandraiah' aged.about 46 years"Occ Doctor' ,-"nyo. e_ir'd,'Frat'xo.+oi:b-iiiris'trna nesio'ericy, MaOnuranagar Hyd. 'o'i,i,r^f ,;[lll3"*#ll#"?Hflff li;tf; 3,?H'1!T'I3ffiaoccDoctor'Fr/o l4S.AlaRamaDevi,Wo'AlaVenkateswaraRao'aged..about54years' '-bcc o6i6i,'riid venfuta nami Nursing Home' Anakapalli l49.VSriLakshmi,W/o.V.SureshBabu'age$abo.u!39years,Occ ' -"uou""witi,' -piot't'r6. is' Llc colony' Hyderabad -73 o* nyt. 'uo;.,of sgti"?'Js:fi i3mfu ?i:i#a!,i,"3?ESs,Tii:B#89,.3:ib'f:" V;;&illli,-Hanamkonda, warangal' i3"" *""' FBiHlll 'u'.,o,or?,#ayJxl5'-.:1?;"tff"Ti:#:':*f,Tl#-"":';i-'u'ffi 'u'o"" Mandal, Guntur District' "n13?Jgl,l,,[3:Aii:i5l,U1iJ'i,"-:i5i.?tg"'l"U'i'??l

153. 63 Yea Dist. [:33lil3,Y'l"lf J*:l{ll-}H:,ls:5'y',T5*l}"J1",J,ts'x,i,?:R1&:"* 'uh," r,j1l$Jilsllt,.IJ:if;?illot?[;"?"t,?!"1i'.on'"Y'%T *o""n""13[:"'Yil: 155. h.V.M. Raju' S/o A'V'N' Raiu' {9!! about 43 vears' Occ Software Enqineor, R/o. Ftat r.ro. n-joi, sriSfib-atta Apartments, East srinivasa Na6ar ColonY, HYdrabad' 'uu;.","[iB3?!??3|r',iU?"53[fl ,511Pfq',iii,#:t'Is$b5fr #^i3io*3',.'?l." East Srinivasa Nagar Colony' HydraDao' r49 157 - '-'Housewife, lnamouri Gowri, Wo. l. Rama Krishna, aged about 60 yeqrs, Ogc h/o. 6-3-629/4, Flat No.402, Purusho(ham Enclave' Anandnagar, Khainatabad, HYderabacl.

158. Aisha Khatoon, Wo. Ahmed Abdul Haleem, Agred about 49 years, Occ ' --nou".*t?!, riro. i.rv".s-i16i]iihozahZt'i Mi*ei, d6si Hospital, Flvd'

159. Sheela MadhuSudhan, S/o. Shankara Rao, Business, Ri/o. Plat No.102, Sreenivasa Apartments, Mansurabad Road, lndiranagar, Hyderabad. abottt 46 years, Occ iOO. . N. Prasanna, W/o. M. Amarender' age{ about 43 years' ' - -nousewite, Wo.+-a-i ss, Sreekashiram Niva-, Gowliguda, Ram Occ Mandir, Hyd -

12. 1

61. Unqarala V.V.N. Krishna Rao, vears. Ocd Business,Fi/O. Flat No.10 Asifnigar, Hyderabad S/o. Late U.P. 1, S.V. Raja Heaven about 52 Nagar,

162. Chowdavaram Jhansi Rani, Wo..ltl ' - y""r", Occ Housevtrife, No-17-1-3911718' 163. ChoMavaram Jhansi Rani, Wo.M years, Occ Housewife, Rlo -17 -'l -391 fi la, .S.T.Ram .S.T.Ram Reddy,

164. Mannem Manorama, Wo. M. Krishna Mohan ReddY Heavens vears, Occ EmPloYee, Fl/o. Flat Alphonsas High School, KalYan No.401, Nagar, about 33 abad, Hyd, about 33 , Hvd about 60

165. Tunugu years, about 56 Karam Dharam 166. Battina JaYa GoPi Housewife, Rl/o. Plot No ntla Tara Sesha Kumari, Wo. Late T. Occ Housewife, Ri/o. Plot No.101, Road, Balkampet, Hyderabad - 16. Part:ll W/o. B. Kameswara Rao, 80. Flat No.301 , Laxminagar about 62 years, Occ Hvd.

167. Yalamanchili Sri Kumari, W/o.Y.Bagiradhn',aSed.ab9t4..98 years, Occ '-'Housewife, nyo. ALPHA-r10, Hl-Tech CitiRoad, Jayabheri Silicon County' Kondapur, Hyderabad. '168. lnamoudi Gowri, W/o. l. Rama Krishna, about 60-yeas' O-cc ' - Housewife, iVo. 6-3-629/4..F1at.No.402, Purushotham Enclave, Anandnagar Khairatabad, HYderabad. 'unio,."#,T"#'reffi #i:aAlT,".'.l,H9:1,,ift':f; si,t%11ft B$#fl ffi 3:'o"" about 46 years, Occ

170. Sheela Madhusudhan, S/o. Shankara Rao, Rl/o. Flat No.102, S reenivasa Apartments, 'Business, Mansurabad Road, lndiranaga r, Hyderabad. 171. N. Prasanna, W/o. M. Amarender, ?ged Housewife, Fy o. 4-8-135, Sreekashiram Nivas, -12. about 43 Occ , RAM Mandir, Hyd

172. Chowdavaram Jhansi years, Occ Housewife, Ri/o- 1 Hyderabad - 59 Rani. Wo. M.S.T. Ram Reatdv;aged about 33 7 -1 -391 17 ls,Saraswathinagar, Saidabad'

173. Derugula Eedaiah, S/o. D. Sanlav^a'.aged about 62 ye.9E'-9-c9.,,,,--^ Business, PJo. C/o. D. Narasimha, Opp Shilpa Apartments, Konoapur vlllage' Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District- 150

174. T. Software 175 Ntrkala Radhika ReddY' " -1rears, Or:c Buiiness, R/o Plot Wo. N. Sreedhar No.33, Sree NilaYam about 57 uda, Hyd. "uiu,o.#l8i3i:s$fu lYi"-i$'1ilSliili"1ffi!"?3X,1f#'.:fl 177. Sttnkara Harshita, D/o. Pt'iameela,. aged about 28 vears' Occ Student' R/o. Plot No.20/A, e sroti,'5'ti G;tr'iiitidir' Yousufsuda' Hvderabad' 178. Shankar, S/o. Harichander aged about 56 years, Occ Govt. Service, R/o. SR'I'1020, Sanathnagar, y;"o'o"" 1re;oo,tK,,naaoanmiNasfi &:effJE][}ffi :r%to;:ffl""Hx[u]o,;,"n'o Hyderab,ad - 500 058

180. R. Sivaram Secretary R/o. A-204, Hyderabad - 500 034. S/o. R Mew 42 years, , Banja .12 Occ Company ra Hills, J. Narendra Babu, S/o. J M D-as, qged about 58 vears' Occ Employee' 181 . '"'R/o. c-1"'v;ii(ata rrsniia-Eiltitli.Suinifra Nagar, Kuliatpally, Hvderabad. Klza JayaPrakash, S/o K' !'eeladhara Rao' aged about 27 years' occ fi2. '"'E,,proy;"li.i6lndt'HiiS,liiir-Ai'ar"tr,liin Housing eolony. Kondapur, Hyd. years, e. Chalicham

183. Occ Retd. EmPloYee,

184. Kana Suresh Babu, S/o. K Ramaiah, Enclave, Beside aoed about 56 Years, Occ Almway Office, Hill ToP ColonY, 'uu*,o",["J?,G[xtllifj?#5]'Fr*o:g#aB:kl',"If; 3f;fnif ,'ff '*"' "ui*do#,3'."*7olsi3l'ff.?L*,Jg?'€J[:81';,3?tXf L",iiu'l,l?1?;8"&, 1R7 Pulioadda Vvdehi, Wo. Siva Rarna Kumar' aged.about 42 years, Occ ' -' 188. Gullapalli lndu Madhavi, Wo' G' Rama' aged about 39 years' Occ '""ior..iit]Flo:i,6IN":diiC:riit r'to.c-e-, samikruti Palace. MLA colonv' nousewifel R/o. 1 -i 0-304/5/8, Brahmanwad i' tsegumpel' Hyo' Hyderdbad - 5oo 058. iiffi-1",;.i2,-B;njara Hits, Hvderabad - s00 034

189. Nirmala Reddy, Wo. S Obula Fp99V' ggeO about 65 vears' Occ. ' " "e r. i n"" ;,' irJbl bTOl-Si tUihi"irovar HeightS, Ma novika s N a g a r. S ecbad 190. Ch. Uma Rani, Wo. C.N' Kesava-Chand' '"t.ooviie. wi.t-'t-zstz'l' Flat No'205, Sai Ram aqed about 49 Years, Occ Siri Sampada APts. Leela r.ririar, tlebumPet, HYderabad

191. years, Hvd :,:yeff B',:f l,X5[?YilYil[?:"'.:?'?3*X?ft ffi :iB:':''?fl ""n"'' l5t "'[fr.d."':i[,Sf$fl ilTifJ?,'"fi :[RF"'B''Sii?ftflT"#'i'5'Jn]33['o* udi Krishna, S/o . C Madhusudhan Rao, about 49

193. Fi/o.Plot No. 17,36-136128, Defence , Sainikpuri, Occ 'no;oou,Jl1$ls::"ffi r#ffi,*i'c3'?.3x3,qf#:f ffi?isYasn* 66;y-, if k ctioa' S-R. Nagar, Hvderabad'

195. Kasulavada Latha, Wo G Housewife, Ri./o.10-2-289112015, V'rjayanagar ColonY' Hyderabad fflil,3 .8?li3ffif ffJ[33,131F soffi n"..,

196. Palakolanu NaraYana - Gars, Occ Agriculture, FUo' Aaardtr t lagai, HYderabad. H.No S/o. P V Subba , Flat No.42, Reddy, aged about 76 Mahesratari ResidencY,

197. Obbineni 42 years, Occ ,Ad ResidencY Employee, arsh Nagar, Hyderabad . H.No. ,,S/o . 0 Jaya Flat No Rama ReddY, aged about .42, Mahesivari 1

199. Occ Nagar, mma, Wo P. .No.5-9-22, Flat No ReddY, about 71 Residency, lsanaka HIiill.,T H#fi'%?"$;Y.,llH"ffi 3fl,*,ifl*,33:$,'l*:f ' rabad.

200. .. Occ R.R N, Sri Employee District. nivas ChakravarthY, , Rl/o. H.No.48-320 Gl, Ground S/ o. Late N. Krishna Floor Ganesh Aged r, 42years, Chirital, Hyderabad' -nileerpet, Smt. A. Srilatha @ U.Srilatha, W/o' A'S'M' Raju Aged about 42 years' 2O1. K. Sudhir Kumar, Sio K Pandu' Aged about 62 vears' Occ Retd' "'e,pny""] Fio. *. r.ro. z-zlo"+i/?,' Ci' ti16"i' Bagt' Amberpet' Hvd' ,o, 'u'o"",Hil;;if"' Fyo. 203. Joint Collector-1 ' Ranga Reddy District' (Respondent Nos' 3 to 28' 31 to 39 '-"iii'iiti[ozare hot ndiessary parties in this cRP MP) 2O4. M. Suguna W/o Late Manikona Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs" 205. M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 40 yrs" 206. M. Mahesh Kumar, S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 34 Yrs:;-- 207. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs'' 208. M. Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22 yrs' AllareRl/oH'No.1-57i6ll,StreetNo.3.Serilingampally'Gachibowli, RangareddY District' RESPONDENTS r52 1 1 Petition under Seotioh 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit'tiled in suPPort of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order restraining'fe-s-Poll-d9nts herein from alienating or creating third partY interest in resp6ct of land adrneasuring Ac.42-24 gts of land in Sy.No.51 (Ac.1 7-20gts)' Sy-No.S2 (Ac.15- 36 gts), Sy.No.S3 part (Ac'9-08 gts) situated in Gachibowli Village' SerilingamPatlY Mandal, Ranga ReddY District' Petiticihers : SRI; DJAGAN MOHAN REDOY Respondent No.1t8 ; SRI A H CHAKRAVARTHY Respondent No.41 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the 140,1 58,167,1tt2,183'l Counsel for the Respondeqlt N9e'94135 : SRt P' SRI RAM Noe.36,3783,113'1 SRIABHARATH 17,1 28,133,1 34, 1 38' 1 44, KRISHNA Petition under Section 91 of A'P'(T'A') Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950, aggrieved bythe Oders ln Case No' F2l5884/2013' dt 24-09-2016 on the file of the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District' District. ' S,1J'f,,s*X[ri6: 3l?;.,",3tfliiifif#:!tfif,1,"'?l;:'?,'il:fi:';'of:&T'"d:'JJ; -tfr ii[ffi ::'1'r"HL"*'xffi 'ft Districl.. "'?o"i *q*i,$#-*il'ffi'f;ttSShP'3'fi s fnulr*"t Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 48 yrs ' 6. Khrn.,*"t Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 44 yrs i *n"nu*", Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs ' ' 153 Petitioners 5 to 7 are Agriculturists, R/o H.No'1-35, GachiboWli' Rangareddy Disfrir* LRs or the deceased P4 as per (Petitioners5toTare b.o., dt.24.11.2021 in ,trts[tst rrr,"-as PETITIONERS . AND

1. GADDA SWAMY, S/o. LateGgq-qa Balu Linga R/o. Gachibowli Village' Seritingampally' Mandal, R.R. Dist'

2. Gadda Narsimhh, S/o. Late G4qa Latchaiah R/o. GachibowliVillage, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist'

3. Mohd. Ghouse, s/o. Late t\to[d.lsmail Rl/o. Gachibowlivillage, Serttingampally Mandal, R. R.Dist'

4. Sved sardar, s/a. Syed Ahmad Ali R/o. Gachibowlivillage, serilingampally M-andal, R.R. District.

5. Sved Nawab, s/o. Late syed Ahmad Ali Ry o. Gachibowlivillage' Si:ritingampally Mandal, R.R. District'

6. Sved Pasha. s/o. Late Syed Ahmad All R/o. GachibowliVillage, S6ritingampitty Mandal, R.R. District'

7. Sved saleem. s/o. Late Syed Kareem R/o. Gachibowli Village, S6ritingampaliy Mandal, R.R. District' g. Sved Azeem, S/o. Late Syed Kareem R/o. GachibqwliVillage, Serilingampally M-andal, R.R. District.

9. Sved Naveem, S/o. Late syed Kareem R/o. Gachibowlivillage, Si;ritingainpaEv Mandal R.R. District'

10.Sved lbrahim, s/o. Late Syed Kareern R/ o. Gachibowli Village' '- S6ritingampailv Mandal R-R. District' 1 1. Sved Khasim, s/o. Late Syed .Kareem R/o. Gachibowli village' Saritingampaily Mandal R.R. District' 12.Sved Nadeem, s/o. Late Syed Kareem R/o. Gachibowlivillage' - Si:ritingampally Mandal R.R. District' 13.Gadda Yadaiah, s/o. Late Gqdda Ramaiah R/o. Gachibowli Village' - Seritingampally Bandai R-R' District'

14.Gadda Ariun, s/o. Late Qaldl.Ramaiah R/o. GachibowliVillage' Seritingarirpdtty Mandal R.R- District'

15.Gadda Raju, s/o. Late Ramaiah R/o. GachibowliVitlage, serilingarnpally Mandal R.R. District. l6.GaddaRamesh,S/o.LateMaisaiahR/o.GachibowliVillage,serilingampally Mandal R.R. District- ' lT.GaddaLingam,S/o.LaJqG_a{4aBabaiahR/o.GachibowliVillage, Seritingam[allv Mandal R.R' District'

18.Gadda Sadhan, s/o. Late Gadda Babaiah RI/o. GachibowliVillage' - Serilingampallv Mandal R.R. District' 154

19. Gadda.Kurnar,, S/o. Late Gadda Babaiah R o. Gachibowli Mllage' SerilingarnPallY Mandal. R.R. Districf. 2o.Gadda Serilinga S/o. Late Gadda Babaiah R/o' Gachibowli Village' R.R. District. ,.' ssf,xir:Hpj,iiifff,laii,?i.H,B.Gadda 22 .Gadda Mallesh' S/o: Late SerilingamPallY Mandal; R.R. Babaiah FUo' Gachibowri V*age k R/o. Gachibowli Village,

23.Gadda Seriling arnpally S/o. t€te Gadda Ashok R/o.. Gachibowli Village' al. R.R. District. .Ssf ,.,fr3il#irt,,fi ;kEli,?l$1BBilt"1:"tFr/o'Gachibowrivirrase' 25.Gadda Eishwar, S/o . Late Gadda Babaiah FUo' Gachibowli Village' Serilingam pally Mandal R.R. District. ^33$,ii,,,ifi1itlf ffi *lx,iaFlB3,?S:LatchaiahFr/oGachibowriVirrase' ,'Ss$,f"i5HJxitfi ',;';.5tRR:$13,'iaihaiahR/o'Gachibowrivirrase' *3:1,*iys['rfil'fi 1?lri?.:f#3ilFnt?]'nFr/oGachibowriVirrase' 33f f,#f i}:ix ff :fl ili R'.R: Bss,f&;f,i1i,?tii;?li *.*irn&*li td:i.:i*a Bh u par Fr/o G achibowri Vi I ra ge' Bhupar Rr/o G ach ibowr i V,r ag e' .,S::,*d;i1trili,,"*"iA:.:sf$F"?huparFr/oGachibowriVirrage' Ss$,.,&;spfilfi ih.ti? *fl: S*l$t"?.

33.C. Mah,:nder, S/o. Lalq SeritingarnPallY Mandal R.R. B h up ar FUo G a ch i bowr i vi*as e' Pentaiah Rl/o. Gachibowli Village' ,r , ., .03"|1f, .ug €l$"0?,iiti"H:,yt'.ft1B8?lllltFi/o'GachibowriVirrage' nnR/o'GachibowriVirrase' nnRi/o'Gachibowrivi.ase' ";;i{;.l*";;-:,/"^,,H1?,HH:&"1,?:f .u3;5i"Xl?""J;fJ,"ulif"lklfl?a[fi :f " B:xf, ff i:[i otii,r'h?'f.y'1$ :fl: Sffi n nro G ach i bowr i Vi I I a s e' a8.The Spl. Grade Dy. Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer' Raiendranagar * 39. The Dy'. Collector & Tahasildar' Serilingampally Mandal R'R' District' 40. Authonzed Officer Land, Reforms Collectorate R R' District' Hyderabad' oiri.idi, Raienordnagar R'R' District' 155 -'Rff }?Hi:l+ffi[F^1}ri#it1iffis]HirF?sBsr;'4"1lli"." 42.Mls. Kastopabr-porali-ofr,.BeP, by its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar R Kamda - R/o' 5- * St"tion Road, Nampallv, Hvderabad. d{?, f"p F-t

43.G.S.Raju, Nationaf Director Maharshi lnstitute of Creative' Masabtank "ilKfiili'Fi.jti,i, Hyderabad.

44.Gadda Sankardied, - 45.Gadda Krishna d'led, - 46.ManikondaYadaiah,S/o.l-4gManikondaKonda.dahAoed52vears.Occ Asricuttu re Ry d:ii: fu;: tivi'i :'Gil[iftui, Serliinga nig a I iv R-a ns a Reddv District. 4 -' 47.D.Gandaiah,S/o'lateDqrap..alliAged62years,occ.AglquJtypR/o.H.No.1- 56/1, c;;hiub*riviiiige sefiringaffiaplly, Ransa Reddv District. 48. Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. p. ...S.hankar Aged about 60 vears, Occ Housewife - " Fi; H. N;:1:ai:'61?ni6li,iai'viir;#; s.;,irnga mpiuv M'a nd a r R R Di st 49.G.Darchah,S/o.G.Shq1larAqedabout4l.years,oqclAgricullure,RJo. H.No.1-44, ca;tiiilfiiViiil.;,'"S;tirTngi*prtiv Mahdat Rahsa Reddv District'

50.G. Suresh, S/o. G. ShankarA.qei aboq! 39..years' O-ccAgriculture Rl/-o' H.No.2-62laB:i2i:dlai#*l.i"Viiid",s"'lifig;mbattvMSndalRangaReddy District. u'3R::Y:-[:S3l*'J3*?v?l]Ut$iY'fl ;H",:1'3fu1?T:i?:Rtqli"u*ureRr/o 52.G.Prakash, S/o. G. S-@q(arAged about 35 years' OccAgricultyre R/o' H.No.1-++, Oi|n'il;ii'\fi'il"g",-S-,Jtii"gi*piii, Mandal Rahga Reddv District'

53.G.Prakash,S/o.G.ShenIarAgedabout35years'OccAgricut!"q1o' HNo.1-++,eJInffi;,ii'Vil6;;"#iifis;'"p;iittraahoatRansaReddvDistrict

54.G.Sanjeeva,S/o.G.tltrqhnaAgedabout32.years,OccAgricultureRJo. H.No.1-44, c;;Xib;wtiilidsd,'$;rin-;ri pillv Mandat Ranga Reddv District'

55.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna Aged about 29 years, occ Housewife R/o' pr" v" t a n d a l, R a n s a R ed d v D i stri ct H . No . 1 -++, e l?nid;ftiTi/iiffi;; s;'ftjlL ", District.

56.G.Jaipal,S/o.G.KrishqaA.g"dabouJ2Tyears,occAqricultureR/o.H.No.1- 4 4, G a ch i bo*r i Vi riiri-.i,' Se riiTngrfiJJiv rtn i n o u t R a n g a R e d d v D i s t r i c t 57.G. Naveen,'S/o G. KristpaAged abo.ut ?-5 Vqap* Occ Agriculture RJo H'No'1- 44, G ach i bo*riV-i rid#]'5ir?iib-irprt if rua no a t Ra n g a Red d v D i s t ri c t' 58.G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krig!.1a Agpd about 23 y9a.r9' Occ Agriculture R/o' H . No. 1 -44, G;}.O*O,OOr,=$fiii'"s;,,pa'tV n71 i no a I RE nsa Redd v Di strict'

59.Smt.N.'SobhaRani,Wo.N'VijavaKumar OgOltSlears.'OccHousewife R/o. Plot No.+t,T;E;;: t'iag;i, Gachibowli' R'R' District

60.V. Raiendra prasad, S/o. Satvanara.yana Aged 53 years, occ Business Rl/o' -" ii9:3Ri Sanathndgar, HYderabad' 156 u,-hHiai,iffi Soag?r'#g?:,: rayana R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally 62rSurender, S/o. B- Suryanamyana FUo' Flat-No'2O3' TarakarElma Eatates "''iljril5;j51'ai+,a"riratp"ra,Hyderabad-27 ( *'iioi 63.V.SureshBabu,S/o.V.P.BabuRaoAgedabout33years'occBusinessRlo' 64.Mrs. V. tJdayini, Wo' V' Sudhakar-Aged.about 52 years' Occ House wife R/o' *' lt6.rie, ilC botonv, Hvderabad -73 d:b-ii bit Al Miruthinagar' Yousufsuda Hvderabad' u'h3,HJ,"ffi

66.P.V.S.R. Das, S/o. V.P. Subba Rao Fi/o' 27OG-1'noaa ffo'f f i:39i'?i?1,;?#f, Ai"5:liv"tg&ii5::L?3#1Ba:* "f'bilee Hitts' Hyderabad:

67.K. RadhIl Krishna Murthy, S o. K.N. Sastry Aged about.7o years, occ,Rtd. "'' L;;6i;' i6. Anina Nii'girbotonv' Khairatabad' Hvderabad' *'il;u;;ili; 63.Smt.CH.Prameela,Wo.CH.V.S.S.N.RajuAgedabout49-years'occ Hyderabad. nii. H.r.rb.a--z-ooiiriir-, r.roomagar, Road No.10 Banjara Hills,.

69.Smt. Ch. Preethi, D/o. Ch. V-S.S'N' $aj.u {ged.9p9ut 26 yeaE;.Rep' by her ""'ri##ii 6FA Horaer"iii vcs.Nt. rfil;u R7o H.No.8-2-601/B/1, Noornasar, i{ilo' Ni,.t o Banjara Hills, Hvderabad'

70.Smt. Deepika Chava, D/o. Hanumantha Rao Wo' Sharath B-abu' aged about ' "' ;i' ;;ilFi. iro.a-2-od+iifi i 8 -ai i i i 4' Dursa remple Lane Road No' 1 2' eatijara Hills, HYderabad -34'

71.Chava China Veerabhadraiah' -S/o' Iate.Kotaiah Aged aboutS6 years R/o' ' ' ' il:iili --i'jiiA, <ipp-br,iiii^vj'Sihool chaitanvapu-ri' Hvderabad' T2.Smt.ChavaHymavathi.W/o.sriChavaChinaVeerabhadraiahAgedabout32 ''' il;;H6: i'. r.6.T-?:i,;i" oip cni itinva Schoo chaitanvapuri' Hvderabad' 73.Chava Sirinivas, S/o. Chava Hanumantha Rao Ag^ed about 36 years Ri/o' Plot '"'il:3di]il;a Mso Jubilee Hills, Hvderabad - 96' '- Siiiiii"s,rrpailv Mandal Ranga Reddv District' 74.Smt'Cl.l.Bhanumathi'W/o.CH.ShivajiRl/o.GachibowliVillage, 75.Smt. Cl-|. K. Usha Rani, D/o' f Q f' lrlg$nv.flo' Gachibowli Village' ' -' 76.Dr. K, Ivlanmohan Reddv, S/o' K' Venkat ngO{y {Oeg 65 yearS' Oce Doctor ' "' Hi;: H.i 6)-i-s2s, Ni*5bli Adda Kachisuda, Hvderabad' 77.K. Praveen Kumar Reddy'' S/o.K' Shankar Reddy Ri/o' Gachibowli Village ' ''Serilingampally SEiiiing'iri;allv Mandal Ransa Reddv District' Ranga Reddy District' TS.Smt.G.ViiayaLakshmi,W/o,C'Chandra.MouliRi/o'GachibowliVillage '" Sliiiii"sr-.ipilly Manoal Ranga Reddv District' Tg.Smt.P.PrameelaRani'W/oPrasadRaoRl/o.GachibowliVillage, ' -'Setiiingarpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 80. Smt. T. Padma, W/o. Vijay Kumar Aged 49. years,' Occ Household Rl/o' "" E.ilii.i r-r-r ii, eapuna'ga, Saroornigar, Hvderabad' 157 .,fi n:Ifl:?l')i,#l';":#',1$"?5:H$gf'fi #ffi b:""HousehordR/o g2.Smt. V. Shankuntala,-l/v/o. Muralidhar Rao Aged.56 years, occ Household "-' Hi;:' il. N; J 1 : i:i-iT'#;r"';s*.'Siroo masai, Hvd erabad' "!?XPdgccBusinessRr/o Hi;:' [. N;;i T,ii i?, iffp ulus 5r, S a ro-o m as a r H vd e ra b a d' '.fi :ff lqll,"Htf aBl""S"tt?**..%.nXf 84.Smt. B. Sangeethq.,W.lp=-Latg B, Ramesn Ageg.60 years' occ Household " -' uu3[]li,ll1jl,?*,i,R?$[]ffi ,f Hl3[.78',1?HllooGachibowriVirrase' g6.Gulam Manstafa Kha.n, Q/o. Dastaoiri Khan Rl'/o' Gachibowli Village' ""' 5J,iTin's;;GE?;,ia"i Cangt Recldv oistrict' 87.M. Pumachandra Rao, S-,/o. M. Venkat Rao R/o. Gachibowli Village' "'' Serit'ili'aiip;it Miiio'it Ranga' Reddv District' gg.smt. M. Bhavani, wo. gudhakar R/o. Gachibowlivillage' Serilingampally -- gg.D. Venkateswara Rao,-s/o. sri Lakshrlana. Rao R/o' Gachibowli Village' " "' 90.V. Gangadhar Rao, S/o. !'-!991a Swgrmy Ageg about 71 years' Occ Retd' Em ptoyee ruo.' iiiiJj-i-i-lOg t Ct A7, pacimaia bha n ag a r M e hd i p atna m, Hyderabad. 5" rti-tiga;dit Manadl Ranga Reddv District' Mandal Ranga ReddY District' gl.Smt.D.AmruthaVahin!,_Wo.D.r.Prqblaka.rRaoRl/o.GachibowliVillage, "' E$iiiidfiHli, Mlnod'nansa Reddv District' 92.Smt. B. Chandana, {/9'-B' Chandra S!g\a-rSao R/o' Gachibowli Village' "' S"iiiin'du-,ilpitV Mdndal Ranga Reddv District' g3.Smt.P.jayamma,Wo..P.EalavanthaRaoRUo.GachibowliVillage' S eril i ngampaiiy'MatiOai o Ranga Reddy District' g4.Smt.Jamuna,Wo.SriY.PerrnidhiRag{ged53years,occHousewife,R/o. -d;;ii iio*ti v i tT,, g e, S 6 ri I i n s a m p a I I v M a n d a l' H . N o . 5 5-A, * [1.i ;"r.i ;dd. Ranga ReddY District. g5.Smt.M.VenkataLaks|rqri,Wo.SriVerkZeshwaraRaoR/o'Gachibowli "" Viirig"; s"rili"gampalv Mandal' R'R'Dist' - - 96.R.NageswaraRao,.S/o.RaghavaiahRl/o.GachibovivliVillage 97.Smt. G. Ratna Kumqri,-tv/o- Ramesh R/o' Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally - seriiin"gampaLy Mahdal. R'R'DisL frnanOai Ranga ReddY District' Sutil i ngampiiiy n tariOaiS'aqqa -M dy D i strict' gS.GulamHafeezuddin,.S{o,LateG.Nizarlu!$inFi'/o.GachibowliVillage' - - 99. B.V.B.V.N'P- KutumqS.&ao, S/o' Narcaigh R/o Gachibowli Village' S erili nga m pitiy tvtinAal Ranga Reddy District' l00.Smt.Y.AneelaKumari,W/o.AiayKumarR/o.GachibowliVillage, serilingam;;ilv ffiali ninga'n'eddv District' 158 .o, Sgll;f;y,,$3fr,"ft?,"Yji i.i?i!"iH".&ts3' Gacnibowrl Virraee' '*'$;sl&liF,::li3["8?,:'f;]f 103. smt r,, 3st?Hi#6?;ts;BX?1fl&:,fSE:fiffi,*l F"U;lE:"-i]'"ffi#.B#flH8F&8* vears' occ Ho"':'o .nn.Bglli,lll'#ilIi ii^?flfl:lHH',i;W[1["$l&]$l.'* ,ouBIS"*f&tYJ;"",ffi |:^'JS3,JJ,:i.,'JJ:'S"1T*4evears'occ '*' [ * ,r.S*i?ll,"fit;rtl",'ft 8gi*rn: "lJirtJ"r3,?t?]ee ' R/o' Gachibowli Mrlage' serilingamparrv "?aYil3'ft '.il?H"hsachibowriVittase' R/o' Gachibowri Mnage' esctriiowri M,ase' , n" B;X;ifi,y3,.?X3,i;ft[;il?,,titx13?ravana ros. 5;ffiSX.?lfiXtih?il: 3 *"B,:l'"'"n . o. 5;fi,ffffi fi uYh ],'h?ix'l 3l3l]?j'Y,iagachibowri Mrrage' FUo' Gachibowri MrraEe; ,,r.8:ili,llLil[]'o'^l?"?1,??x!,'4305?'#.9*Gachibowri'Mrtage' ;. {1 2. smt },r.sh;:,?rffli;y,R,y,|?R5,.ilt,R/o' Gachibowri M,age' ,,.3g]li;,##liiti; :Lla#lt,i,i:'{s}fi B?.l.x"GachrbowriVittase' 1 1 4. V.s.V Nar;fi l,rffii:l ;i?r: ffi$,$#fv R/o' Gactribowri Virrase' u S[llt,iJ]i $?,! # i";' h:'Iffi yH::5,1t F&:'ibowri B5li,,ffl*Ui,i$lt iJi-!"! y.:33ibg,?":achibowri " ,, u. ',"3:lli,[If Vitrage' vilaoe' ;siil[,",1'.';,Hil;#[S&t,l8ii.R/o'Gachibowrivirrage' v R/o' G achibow* Virrase' ,, r B:,ft l.J I#fiLH,?.?{"*,"rL: H.Y8Xfl ,$#f Rao FUo' Gachibowri Virra ge' I 1 e. S:Xiil8:t rTi, ;- F 5"5131)[tr ^r:"i.,\l "03:k1e3rrr$[x{liil3r,?'1iry?Ai?lEil(ff ffi;i.tT$jtEb.3fafl'3u"" ffi.i;:'id";' t'tasai ext ' Gachibowli' Hvdet "'3l3ill";J3,X''3ill611isi,'3?;.ffJf f 'fi"Y""[:ff '"9"1'""#'?o"Y?ft P"R' 159 rzz.r,a,aS[ffi3tiJJf, i?S:F{r'ik3li&]Hf 8"#i#ff "rAH"?'u:S- rza.fi ravap#lllvili?fiJlft [:.,[i:.str[ffi ,1i,"riS;:.*i5eveas'occ '-ElHrffi :dil*Hhr*f i5'fi f r:1'1i"""t4**:u""fi H'"Bffi "'' l25Nadimpatti,W3lft :tuYi?U-.Yii-Sffi *,'iL[?{6fl if doOivari District' "1T#hTuilS&*'*"

126.Nadimpam,.*ifll?:ffi1:flf;[ilfi hYHillfl ],%"9,i:if:31J"?X?"?* Distri€t. "'[Ht3Bf,XruYE11Ei$[iYY1"sf;''1$hx:H'i#41*:Vi#'ffifr'ftr District. l2sKunaoaraigg'&f "d[ii:E:"€,y:#-?r;i?,5.,iY"t?,];ff 'Hlffl""t,i:H: Weit Godavari District' "'ffi {!#ff :r,l"xffiH|f{ff iiiflf, ,[:'3'?":xira5f; l30Makkena,B6gt?i1Pi"?,ft ;'43,,','J*#[If #:.1fl:e[1;9]u?1?ln?3.* Fffi ifr xi:', Nagar, Hyderabao' rsr.Kantamaneni,:]Ai:,F*i,,l"Yi$;33ttXi"1i?-i,l,i"tt"Xir?T5l38af "o' HYderabad. t 1 32. Mudd-apat,i!, g" ri#i j ,Y-3 1 !:u[95?if SiS iBJf l33MedasaniH1;fJ3,"ffi:ilr-Yihi)8,Yf t?"'lSi:fi P#"??fr,i31'l'i3R'' ffi f" o?3: ""

301. Ravi Teia APart 5it"iiii.a. i[bsisi'rda' Hvderabad' 134Musunuru jpyg;?1lyl;;$Y;5fl?lXliol1?#;',X?f,:',?3J"":'"'o* Hyderabad - 45' rssr<aogt5pggl."i:X,:El:lilblti,5"ff it%l|#fl f; l3llt3"'"Xi:rH5" 3i.eet' Cnittoor - 517001 136chintakunlfu'Xii5l!:$glifllo?;,',i11fl?1:b$'fi 3"1'3',',3:,iF?R:o* Iiii.stiansat, HYderabad' ,r:Jl[:B:"";",1"f :,.1,T,.d?1:ii,S'fi lsStf, :',:.#n!el;B3i;,iY'oabout4s bi?it-"6iun''khamznara District' 160 r38. r Jhansi, S/o d;IRT6IllllftS%H#T* r, vears. occ Doctor R/o' HrG- "nAi":?[ft S3]?.,?i";]Jffif5y*S3*j3n$iffi-i,"'occHousewire' rao.eanlarr.raV6f e?t1-?3,."*",-f 8'l""Bgifi?fl A?J:ittlrffi ffi'"?.?n ss *to' o-1 ,*,. gpl?l?lu?B:Jliili,Sll*^?,flillnft ,*,lffi! 3ffi 't 142e,"BSiltAmffi :Pi?*.f !"oB;[:i3':i:ftt$ii:H:f; LlF,i5;8ff ,"o"o 1€.pBabysagi[:,#Ji-]1%:"il,ij8ft Sll$?*3ff ['r1'.'S8Rvoffe.ir"g",,r- fusiness' lTdetabad -74'

144.Kona\/en5ffi 58l'S:1?iil'-7:r.lri'isY;H:[s:]:fi 3ff .3!9't-38,*' 'Pi'le-m' Visarnapatnam - 1 3' ,r+do,og,,o,?Hll,LlL'-3.'Sor";f X,?13-Ei?:HSti,ffi ffi 3llLT,1$J"?"' ; ffidfi;iv, Secuncierabad-26' '*By,ls,Y:l.[#1,'":%oiluX)ru!5ihP"y":;r:?Sfr ,,1or&11T)1[ffiY.i{?;[?[53iTtffi ,:f"ft :""Jtlf ft frSE63r"R"!'Emprovee' yo'3ilTlJgfl,?,:l?ff ?a{'ft ;*,'""+:X)::{ffi'mfl ;,i8ffi '"X$'E"'"ffi i"' t$f"ebo,.6evears' HYderabad - 82' '*3"X?lll"1l?'.:iffi Xx?;,],i"[*?y-538$H?;ff #f"$F3'Yfi 8fa' HYderabad - 82' l50.MadduriKarnarlnfl'ft Rl#.YB?li,[:fl:?:1,:1*Yd HYderabad - 82' 1 5 1 . Mad c uri u a h r i / g 9 ! Occ I)vt. EmPloYee t'<r HYderabad - 82' h /roH*"uf-".'_a&?n li:?.}ffiI Aoed about 75 Years' , Sbmajiguda, Aoed about 44 Years' L5ne, Somajiguda' ls2.MadcruriHari, j"*)"ol$"Y;:.'_A&??X:,?"EtgL:f f #$i8l,vaears'occ HYderabad 82 -r53'y3:r;,93jj,YJ',3r1,i,*lf,['H{'?;I31ft ['1""jr?l]15'[A#::a33i'u' F;6ii;;Ch'' Khu,n"* District' 1s4Jam1,a,aB:Tl:1Hili:1#J1,1_Xt3i,$[:ilY"11[h5"tigf ?.r"r* 155Eut!:1g:1taR71!RisIi-X?afr%:Uili;"i""?1tfl:'"?3"vf ftTa333" :- --'--"- :-'--- - -- " t6t

156. Sumku Rangaiah, S/o' Aswadhamaiah' Aged about 79 vears' Occ Govt' servant oentliS"l6#:"Ry;l i;Ii rurliitiiit Mirtet, Nandhvala, KNL: i'Hi8ifl ,X;E:?Yi33/i?reffi ffi X[3ffi,1fi":* ls7VesicH,i.dslyff MehOiPatnam, HYderabad'

158. Chintakunta Narasimlia Reddv' S/o' G' Basava Puqna!?[l!,i38"#"UtfJ- ru;;occ priuate'Emp^rovee, nyo 12-1-331195/1, Datti ft6gai, HYderabad - 5oo 028' l5g.GondaNageswaraRao,S/o.G.ec$y,fv.nnaiah.,ng"oabout60years, Occ Ag ricu ltu re, Ri;. i{:'N; :i - 1 -r1 5A i, B al kampet' Aireerpet' Hyd' 160. Gonda Nageswara Rao, S/o G.-Qgrsava Punnaiah' Aged about 60 years' 5;* & ;il,it*", Rd . T{i. i'r"o .7 - r-- 2 i fc/t, e a I ra m petl Ameerpet, H yd . 1u,[31X3J?,::Hf; :#:bfi,H,liiltri$hffi iti,TxL:u*I3f, 83ffi n"

162.KabhampatiVenkataKrishna,Slo,S.RadhaKn:strna_MurttrrAgedabout44 vears. Occ Servic;,hi;: 6fi-6oglg6. Opp SBH Branch, Anand Nagar botony, Khairatabad' HYderabad-

163.periSudl"i,SJ:al.3SL11UH:1#'SBffi #f$,:h?:'"19[?ffi? Occ Colony, Khairatabad, HYderabad' 164Bhavs#xlf ,il,Tr', jift H"tiiJ"Lv,'bh;; K;'Jm Roait' Hvderabad'- 500 016' "Iii'^,'rh5'ii:irffidl8f€,*iJLu"l,#'"' 16583gffSg1,51$iliroR5'rllilfr;fi ?31fl1"1,^ffi 8l,f*"*f ',is:tiy"o', 166. Adusumilli sandhya Sree, wio. A.V. Subba- Rao' Aoed about 54 years' occ Housewif e,d;:'i';3;t"s,ix!iruJgr1-Chind-ranag-ar'serilingampallv' Hanga ReddY District - 500 050 ,ur*,nlZn"t:S?:SlA,i&3:i.?iiotX:E33tft?#"3H3iilu"J"?,?iL3B:o!"" 168. Ponnapalli Lakshmi' wiq ? Subraman.ye^sqar.a Rao. Aoed about 52 years' Occ Housewife, RJo.H No 9-+-46'Ig+, i'.-Saiiriung Colo--ny,Hyd€' 169. Peddi Venugopal, S/o P Chalapathi Rao' Ag.9d about 46 vears' Occ Business, ny,i.'Fi;ir.r ; i o +, xur[i]' rdtatbi."xavuri Hiils, iubitee Hitts, HYderabad - 500 033' c;10;r, kuxatPattY, HYderabad - 72' l T0 G o g i n e n,XilS [ili ffi H,"rfr !!fi t?13;*gil f3H.,$r: 1 il,??h*E n as a r 171. Tummala Bhavya, W/o' T Qopi Krishna'.Ageq about 38 vears' Occ Ho usewife, R/o. Ft at No . 20 z, naJi'i I' k;i;ila Apatmentq 6-3-841 /A, AmeerPet, HYderabad' "' ?:,,ta,?",5iiijla8{lrt, Pl3ilSit*,3gfiSr:mitno,?,Ifr3f,;.occoDoctor' 173. K.Tulasi, wio. K. Sudhakar, aged about 38-years, occ Doctor' R/o' Vijaya Talkies noao,'uanumarionoa ihou rastha, warangal. Rr/o 166 Petition under 91 of A.P. (T"A.) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act' 1950' aggrievedbytheordersinCase.No.F2l6067t2o13,dt.24.09.2016onthefiteof the Joint Coller:tor-1, Ranga Reddy District' Between: z.Gaddarlhandraiah,.s/o,.MgigaiahAged..abou!60vears,occAoriltureRl/o' I.GADDABALAIAI{1Sro.:,=GaddaMaisaiah,.AqedaboutToVears,occ Aoricutture Wo. H.No.t-gA,%I"fiiOiti'-Vin"d"' Seritingampdttv Mandal itZnga FleddY Distric't' H.No.1-138/1, Gachibowti viiH;;,' 5er*ing"rnpliiv''rtlriiorr- District. 3. Gadda tiukkaiah, s/o. Gadda Maisaiah Ag..ed about 53 years' occ Aoriculture R/o. H.trto .t -2s.,' Gachibowti'viiHG, sbfiri"b"ii?lri- Mino jl -Rangl -Raiga Reddv Reddv District. 4.KhanarnretShivaiah,.S/0.^Khanarnet..BalaiahAqedaboutT8years,occ Aoricutture R/o. H.No.1-58/" i:"6,Ii if,oiri-Serilingampallv Mandal Ranga iiEdoytiiJtrict. (Died Per LRs)

5. Khanamret Bikshapathi s/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 48 yrs'' 6.KhanarrretKumarS/o.LateKhanametShivaiah,aged44yrs.' T.KhanarrretMalleshS/oLateKhanametShivaiah,aged34yrs.' Petitigru;rs 5 to 7 are Agriculturists, Fl/o H.No.1-35, Gachibowli, Rangareddy District. (Petitioniers 5 to 7 are brought On record as LRs of the deceased P4 as per b.o., dt24-71.2021'l PETITIONERS AND - __:..r^ ., l. PoCHI$,IAREDDY RAV|NDRANATH REDDY,^S/o Sri P. Ramanjuta Reddy Aged s:l years,bcc"BJii"a; nyo. H.tto. 11492, Smith Road, Kadapa 2. Smt. A: Kalpana, Wo' Late A' Suresh Bapu a-gel! about 38 vears' Occ ii;' G Stin's ar Coio nv H vd erabad' Hodbern,ife Ryo. 302, Jyothi p"f "JL]"pi; 3BlLl?1i,xs,1{,il1;1i#lh}i$5:3s:[:T,'13,'.":f"?t,3:J:efilo'" 5 iilgd t-colonY, HYderabad' 4ir,ne,?i"Tuy,?S3:'*?3."i3!,tJ3;?khXo,t},"','15fi1f.1ft?::'1B""tl" 5Sf y;txx,1%?%x',sxl:fi i.%?:'6s:cBusiness 6. Smt. Rerchupalli Surekah, s/9..pri Rachupalli Yella Reddy aged about 50 vears. occ Buiiness R/o. nat uo.r'd5, i-io*"ia Mansion-Plot No'19, Srinagar bolonY, HYderabad. J&in3ffif.?a?',&#tift .-. . 1..1 !:r:i:j*:t r i:-.r , : :.. -Ij,;li:l.gi:i{:gi.rf*-::{?:'1:':'E5::'':1-;'r'lili:;r '-: ';'{-1:-1:';:1-iif i:j;':;:' 'rii '" 167

7. R. Anusha, D/o. Rachupalli:Yella Reddv aged about 24 years, Occ Business R/o. Flat No.103, PadrnaJa.Mansion Plot No.19, Srinagar Colony,'Hyderabad S: R. Rahul, S/o. RachupalliYella Reddy aged about 28 years, Occ Business R/o. Flat No.103, Padmaja Mansion FlotNo.l9, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad.

9. Sri Padidem Chaitanya Kumar, S/o. Sri Mallikarjuna Rao aged about2T years, Occ Pvt. Emp[oyee R/o. H. No.6-127-3, M.G. Road, Railway Kodur Cuddapah District.

10.R. SaraswathiQhailm, D/o. R. Lakshmisekhar Reddv aged about 28 years, Occ Softvvare Engineer R/o. H.No.6-3-581. 8-303, Keshav Del Apartments Anandnagar Colony, Khairatabad Hyderabad. 1 1. Pakala Mahender, Reddy., S/o. P. Papi Reddy a'ged about 58_years, Occ Service R/o. Falt No.6, ist Floor, Building No. C-11, Jeevan Chandrika LIC Colony, Borivali, West, Mumba

12.P. Padmavathi, Wo. Late Sri Pochimareddy Chandra Pratap Reddy Aged about 31 years, Occ Housewife R/o. Plot Nos. 25 and 27. Flat No. 106, Sri Nidhi Towers, S.B.H. Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad.

13. Dr. P. Subba Reddy, S/o. P. Bhaskar Reddy aged about 40 years, Occ Doctor R/o. Kapu Street. Porumamilla Village 82, Mandal, Cuddapah Dist.

14.D. Sharada, Wo. Dr. Marka Reddy aled about 56 years, Occ Housewife R/o. Kapu Street. Porumamilla Village and Mandal Cuddapah Dist

15.Gadda Sankar, S/o. Maisaiah, Occ Agricr.dture R/o. H.No.1-38 / 1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. \

16.Gadda Krishna, S/o. tr4aisaiah OccAgriculture Fl/o. H.No.1-38/ 1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Dish'ict.

17. Syed Kareem, S/o. Khaja Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddv District.

18. Md. Ghouse, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

19. Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

20. Md. Wazir, S/o. late Md. lsmail Occ Agriculture, Rfo. Gachibowli Village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

21.Md. Wazeer, S/o. late Khasim Ali Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

22. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o. late Manikonda Kondaiah Aged 52 years, Occ Agriculture R/ o. H. No. 1 €7l 1, Gachibowli, Serilingamapily Ranga Reddy District.

23. Darlapalli Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged 62 years, O_cc Agriculture R/o. H.No .1 -561 1, Gachibowli Village Serilingamaplly, Ranga Reddy District

24.Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

25.Swamy, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah OccAgriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 'i."'. t. -..i1;:tJi--.:.: .-: .: ": . ". ". :.,::-:::.::-'. -11-ii.,". iu:::"--. :l-.T::- ' 168

26.Smt. Santamma.Wo. tate Balaiah Occ-Agriculture, Ri/o' Gachibowli Mllage, --' SEiii'ingampalff Mandal Ranga Reddy Oistrict' Zl . G adda Yeft aiah, S/o. Gadda Veeraiah O3c.{O1c.u!ty re, Rl/o' G ach ibowli l''vittige;,sirilingimpall! Mandal Ranga Reddy District' 28.Gadda llarsimha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah.occ-Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli' *'Vil6G, $rilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District'

29.Madiqa Pentaiah, s/o. late Veeraiah.occ Agriculture, Fi/o. Gachibowli Village, --' 5Erit'ingimpally Mandal Ranga Reddy District' *'Fi[.'n]iii.i:i+,'dlttrioo*tivillase, 30.Smt.G.Laxmamma,Wo.B.ShankarAgedabout60years'OccHouse-wife seriiinsampallv Mbndal Ransa Reddv District.

31.G. Darshan, S/o. G. ShankarAged about 41 years, Occagricullurg.R/9, . . . "''il.Nl]i:ii,'biJtiioowti Vittage Serilingampally Mandal, Ransa Reddy District. " il'.ii.iliiiiidh+, o"ctiu;ruivirrase SLiitiriganpaily Ma-ndar, Ransa Reddy 32'G.Suresh,S/o.G.ShankarAgedabout3.Qyears,occAgricultureRl/o' District.

33.G. Shiva Kumar, s/o. G. Shankar Aged about 37-years,_occ Agnculture.Rl/o. *'il.r.r-.j.i':++. CliiiiUbwtiViitrge, Seriilngampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Dlstrict

34.G.Fraklsh,S/o.G.ShankarAgedabout35years,occAgricultureRl/o. - il:il,;l-44;'ci"nioi*riVi'lr'is", 35.Smt.G.Susheela,Wo.G.KrishnaAged.about45years'OccHousewife "- Filil' nI i rol-*i+, c'acniuowri virrage, siritingampafiy Mandat Ranga Reddy Mahoat Raisa Reddv District' -s-Jritingi.pttiv District.

37.Smt.G,Saritha,D/o.G.Krishna,Ag.edabout.2g.years'occHousewife,R/o.. 'uEnf"1l'.??Yi,'Jf, i':#uiiffi jg:'r,?"i"iiiBi["ffi i3"::AnJBYlt*"" "' F:i6i:44 ciihioowti vittage, SeriTingampallv M-andal, Ranga Reddv District' * 38.G.Jaipal,S/o,G.KrishnaAgedabout2T.yeqq'-occAgricultureRi,/o..H.No.1. I,i, CliiiiUowtiVittage, Seriiingampaily Mindal Ranga Reddy District. .nf ,[1yta'i'o'1?nPo;[fiJll8#s:,f; r#',ff ,',fi,'.'fi;"?::tl',A:B"'li*o" 40.G. Fraveen, S/o. G. Krishna, Aged about 23 years, Occ Agricuiture. . -" Xi.i.riN;.1f+?, Gicnibowli Vndge, Serilingampallv Mandal' R'R Dist' 41 . Spl. Gr. Dy. Collector & RDO, Rajendranagar Division o' ill Jl;,',ft3i1:f3,:g'; il:J'',.:'i"[fr,ffilf'fl1Bffi:i' 43.V. Raiendra Prasad, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 53 years, occ Business, Fl/o. occ House wire 119, SFIT, Sanathnagar. Hyderabad

44. V. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. V.D. Rama Redd.y, Aged about 50 years' Occ ' eliihei,s, R/o. s-3-3i5/3A, Maruthi Nagar, Yousufguda' Hvd 45. K. Radtra Krishna Murthy, S/o. K.N. Saltry Aged about 70 years, Occ Rtd' - E iptoi=l R/o. Anand N-agar Colony, Khairatabad, Hvderabad 169

46.Mr. B. Jhansi Lakshmi, S/o. Vasu Deva Rao Aged about 55 years, Occ Emplope R/o. Plot No.'t75, Telecom Nagar, GachibowliRanga Reddy District. 4T.Diamond Hills Welfare Assooiation, Rep. by its Secretary Sri P. Narayana Reddy S/ o. late P.V. Subba Reddy

48.M/s. Kastopa Corporation, Rep.by its M.D. Sri Anil Kumar: R Kamdar R/o. 5- 8-57, Top Floor, Kamat Hotel, Station Road, Nampally, Hyderabad.

49.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District. (Respondent Nos. 15 to 46 are not n ecessa ry paft ieS iIi'thTsCRP ltilP) RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 of CPG praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an ofder restraining respondents herein from alienating or creating third party interest in respect of land admeasuring Ac.42-24 gts of land in Sy.No.S1(Ac.17- 20gts), Sy.No.52 (Ac.15- 36 gts), Sy.No.53 part (Ac.9-08 gts) situated in Gachibowli Village, Serflingampdtly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos 3,4 & 11 : M/s S AND S LAW ASSOCIATES Counsel forthe RespondentNos. {,6 & 12: SRI SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent No48 : SRt E. ANISHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2046 OF 2017 : Petition under 91 of A.P. (T.A.) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, aggrieved by the Orders in. Case.No. F216O6612O13, dt.24.O9.2016 on the file of the Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District. Between:

1. G BALAIAH, S/o- Gadda Maisaiah Aged about 70 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-38, G-achibpudillillrye,_Serilingampally Mandal Ranga,Reddy District. 2. Gadda Chandraiah, S/o.Ma,isaiah Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-3811, Gachibowli Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. I :'iili:l-;.:ir':,r i:r,, . ,'i-.!i,i';r,r:i:ilfiii:t:ii:'rilEgii-*'ffit,:ffii'5i-f=.,ri.]I;, if.fioii:"tj::. 5i:f,frfltt4i*i:irr ::ij : .,, . 'i.i:lr<:if#:'E .8e1.ft Distrbt -[xft t70 illTli3l,Sl?nfi3$,f0"#,ffi3':Bll,f;.i3*"p,T"i'n133[?,off *TffiI; 33,ff 1'$xi'ii'd1%#i:E$f;1r"Pfi iflil',s3iodfff u"[?"Iri"ffi "30:1 Rffi;'H"ioy oi.tti"t PETITIONERS Retd f-1";X;L?E[]rt#ffiY,fnT"H,'[riLJ'fi3H"R"," l v cANo or^t o{"mg AND EmPloYere R/o' HYderabad. 2ffi *:3;i?..T[,'":?iKsH,?l?,"F;rsrRll1'ff,r'ft5xj]t",fl'f3ffi 353li.x.;"?H3:e?gs"?Jirl-3filf.?|fl[3,1fi ll,lf'%",te'J,Jff :f Bs'ffi ' rs'occ u

4.K.SureshBabu,S/o.RamaiahAgedabout5gyears,occBusiness,Rlo. 6 1 vears', occ G'air,itnl*li, H Yd erabad' lo*8lLilE,l1' *'gX 1,,Y3;"" M:153',i:AH,$8,$HSf [si,ss,r]l fi l$l'Bil ],#la 5 6 "Yr,tE 7I3kgfl,i,i:*ilHnqYl"3:q,dr"ffiHfi-q.#i#fri[",'ffi .,:* *xT'? lft: #,i:i33,T' 3{:' u#jffi o"" ffifi"iffib"ilv rt/l;il"r, n"nga Reddv District' -HYderabad' R7o. Patetnagar' S.SyedF.arooqNayeem,S/o.,SvedYousufAgedabout4gyearc,OccBusiness' g.JhamumalVatnani'S/o.PeomalVatnaniAgedaboutTgyears,OccBusiness "nshahi' R/o. G owlig'l u tii'uil'n' oir.n fi:i:: ffi 3,fi ,'"",5 1 [,;Y i3 i ?d"3 *l|i,6:ir i i,ftffig 3??iilLl3'{i?ft ff Ho Hyii erabad' , 0 "'' * * District- ll.ParepalliSatvanarayana'S/o'lateP'VenkataRamaiahAgedabout62 vea rs, o." o[?oii,l'r!' iilo]'o'-ir-no h r tapu ri Colonv, Dilsukh naga r' l{yderabad- ,,f,ffi esHi?6i-\:n'a:f.$:f"ff.%1"??:,ii53J33f 'o""BusinessFr/o

13.M.S.$.Rao,S/o.VenkatappaiahAgedabout54years.occserviceRl/o.S.P. ' -' i{olo, Secunderabad' l4.KhanGhiyasuddinKhan,S/o..KhajaAhrygd.KhgnAged5Tyears,occPvt. S ervi ce, ny"l ii "r.r'o .)ij 4-'310, Krri t dvatr, Hyd e rabad . 15.8. Vijava Bhaskar' S/o' B'Sutv3ryfv-11119^?1."bout 48 vears' Occ B usi rress Fl/o. S ival aya m Stre6[ S atyanaray-anapu ram' Viiayawad a i i i I I i t7l 16v"s"yiJ"J5$#?f;l;i5f_lyifl Bi$tt13ffilt*"3$1"ff fl ,?T#Ul "'5""4ff #;oftaEsSlvYfi #;tfi's$g'B*,flPaboirt62vears',occRetd' 18.S. Haritha, wo. S. VenkatswaraRao,Aged about 40 years' occ Service, FUo' '" 6hl^futidtt.C., u.s.e, Rep. bv S. Raja Rao lg.Gali vidya Lakshmi, wo. chandramouli A.ged about 54 vears. occ service' ' "' Hfi . Si;i;a? iiir'JG., Siiil';iidronr t(oitras ud em, Khamma m District. * 20. Pinnamaneni Prameela Rani' Wo' P' Prasad Rao Aged about 54 y'ears' Occ -Kothasudem' Khammam i{;t$il6'dib: Sii;Aa;Iiiiiiiin, biin'g'r colonv' District. 2l.K.Madhumathi,D/o.K.BaswaRaoAgedabout44years,occHousewife "hii3gl?E*Ks,lTXf ff RSY?ibTX":1d""S:'ffi )i?::?Yl?24otN3' 23.v.suiatha, wo V. Ra<lha Krish.na,.Aged about 57 years' occ Housewife' Ri/o' Auioi, Hyderauaa H.No-.1 -1 -336/47, Viveknagar' Hyoeraoao' *i5l;fuyj?f, :$5'I3b,Yjhs6,[ffi #a""]%?o.ii#:fJ"{:fi fd"o,"'3,0 'uk:?i:nnffi -E$)#l""',i#3;Ya!,?X?,*fl'"?l3i.1H:i'vears'occDoctor' 26. Dittakavi Venkateslvara Rao, S/o' D' Lakshm.an Rao Aoed about 63 years' ' "' 6l; R;ie. 5;ri; R/" :r:6i'-6;i;ti, p"6 Vitiase, tvt a ci it i patn a m' Kri sh na District. " 5llfl ::1nfii"18 R1l3:,?'1,?l#ffi lA?f, ff :#[1?"11 J;i E,?31'* 2S.Doddavarapu Amruthavahini, Wo' Dr' D' Prabhakara Rao Aged about 58 '"' i""r''ll tffi 'ti'oiir"1*liJnyo. ri. Nto' z+lt s 1 6, Da rg a m itta' N e I I o re 29.Smt. Billa Chandana, Wo' B' Chandrasekhar.Aged about 42 years' Occ '" ilil6;;f"-Ri;. x.iti. i :2:2c 5t t'to'+, rautniva-. Nasa r' Habsis ud a' 30.Smt. Mehrunnisa Begum, S/o' Mahamood Hussain Aoed about 54 years' Occ Housewife nyo. n. ruo.dl5lz-i iii BffE3ffii:flil [:ft8!;.31?,ts:y:,*3xftT,f, 'fl: n:?,'"e:i$"',1 Jiss;8&i oGtters' Ame6 rpet' Hvd erabad' Hyderabad. "Fii'ti .,

32.K. Pitchamma, Wo. Late K'Venkat ned{y ngq{. about 67 yea'rs"Occ "''iil;ii;6 i6-'dn,jotiiihmi Cimp' eodhan' Nizamabad District' 33.S. Achwtha Ramaiah, S/o' Subba Rao Aged..abortt 65 vears' Occ Business F/o. Ttitecom r.rag ar, eXtidoilI Vi|'igl b-" ri ti g a m pa I I i M a n d a l' R' R' D istrict' " *I;8fl Hyiierabad. $,Ef:ffi?'-3'&ls[3?iK"tlli^fi 3#fr ::?:b"X?#fl ?'rf "" :--:: | ,-- -.-.-- -

35. 172 about 47 Years, Occ D/o. Late Jai Varghis Agql about zl8 years' Occ Service R/ dilirJ tiitti coad:Hyderabad' D/o. Late Jai Varghis Aged about rt6 years' Occ Se'rvice 5lltrE HirG-noad; Hyderabad' V. Rama Krishna, SeMce F/o . Aao, Verghis, 1l2lN3,

36.Sharunatr o. 10-3-31 37. Raveena MV R/o. 10-3-3 11 erghis, tzlN3, 3T.l .Yameen Alladin, S/o . Yousuf Alladin R/o. 10-3.3 'l 5/1 , Masabtank. about 47 Years. Occ Business' I Occ Business Fl/o. Aged 64 Years, Occ $ousewife' 39,s.V. Rantana' S/o. Lakshmaiah, Aged about z16 Santosh nagar ColonY' 234, E.l'.H.S, R/o. 1-1

40.Smt. V. :ffl?I?:#i?"L3,:ff iJ"?:lyff "' o' Y.$??"17,$;,?,{3rY;'-fiS[T3Ia na' Ased 47 years, Occ Housewife R/o' 1-1- Service

42.G ulam lr'lustafa Khan, S/ No. 10-4- R/o. H. 43.Smt. N. Lalitha, W/c. N. FUo. Plot No.40, Teleco R.R. District.

44.Koneru Rama Rao, S/o. Business R/o. Vanukuru o. Gulam Dastagiril(han 771,82118,Masab lanK' *','J"?:8i""'i'.tg,i$ft i?""S Aoed about 58 Years, Occ Hfrerabad. 4 Occ Housewife, Mandal. K. Gooala Krishnaiah A-ged about 64 years' Occ , Virrv5*ror' Krishna Oistrict' 45 G. Ratna Kuma ri, W/o. G. Ramesh .Smt. Household . Rl/o. 989 , Bharathriagar, about 54 ra Puram 46 - Shaik Nlustafa Hussain Junaidi, S/o. Shaik Abdul Hussain Junaidi 59 years, Occ Engineer R/o. H. No.10-3-29 1t$lB. 53 years, Occ m,W/o. Shaik Mustafa Hassan Junaidi No.10 -3-2911918, HYmaYu nagar, hlfl,?.rt!3ll.42 vears, occ Housewife FI/o' 47 .Smt. Oudsi Housevrife a Begu R/o. H. 48.Y. Nirmala, D/o Y. Show Red SirangiPale m, Phirangipuram' Ranga nay HEL, R ,C

49.K. HarclhaYal, S/o Madhara Nagar. B 50. Salvar Ahmad Khan' S/ o. Late Mo hd lsmail Khan.. Aged about 52 Yea rs, Occ Business R/o Flat No .202, B-Block , Skill estate, HumaYunnagar , Hyderabad. 67 Occ Business, Ri/o. 51 .Mohd ilameruddin, S/o. Md. Zaheeruddin FUo.H l.Jo.B-3-22811 280/44, Jawaharnagar' 51 ..Occ Business FlYderabad. R/o. H No 8-1 Aoed about 49 Years' Qqc -Hills Colony Tolichowki' Mohd Yakub -398/PM/1 87. Paramou Busine:ss Fl/o .. HumaYun Nagar, Hyde rabad. 52 .Mohd l(hader , S/o. Late 53 . Basharath Ahmed Khan' S/o- Basheer Ahmed AgErtEtrut32 Years' Occ 54.Afzal lihaik, S/o . Shaik MahMood, Aged 33 years' OcC Business Ri'/o' nth Rao Aged about 54 Years, Occ 'rium Jvrn"t'lagar, HYderabad' Huma Yun Nagar , Hyderabad. ma, W/o. P. Balwa H.No 10-3-192/A, Rl/o.

55.Smt. F'. Ja Emplc Yee Business Hyderabad. .1 t5 t73 Hyderabad. "ilia?xfr Tlltffi [i".|,ti3:1ll*f "ff sT.Smt.V.VenkatLaxmi,Wo.Venkateshw^a-raRaolAOedabout4Tyears'Occ S6.Sefruoalli suresh, s/o. Koteshwar [ao_Aged about 52 years, occ Business - -' gri.teiecomnagbr, Gachibowli, R. R. District' -'' 8ilil,itJ'rilo. H.M.LI aole, saibaba ffi cers colirny sainikpuri' *Fffi *ffi#['*lf X,llilr ji:ahii33:i$389ft 60,D. Gandaiah, S/o. late Darapalli Babaiah Aged.62 years, occ Agriculture Ri./o. --' il.uti --s3/i. dicniuowtivilige serilingariapllv, Ranga Reddv District- 61.Smt. G. Laxmamma, Wo. B. ShankarAged-about60,yeq$'Occ Housewife "'' 6iii'niob*ii Virradi'Seritingampallv Mandal Ranga Reddv District' *' 62.G.Darshan,S/o.G.Shank€rAgedabout4l..years,occAoricultureFl/o' H:Ni":i;;:'b"'iriio,i*ri viiiii,i B6,iri"gi.par1! Marioat Raiga Reddy District. ,1"&1f, l3l#Sffi''3,"i?j=*S?f, "':t'"??il?il""'*:fr ,?:ilL??:"" District. *' 63.G.Suresh,S/o.G.shankarAgedabout3.Qyears,OccAoricultureRi/o' il.r\ri):62izrbl)+, cacniLiwiviiase s;tiris;mriany uaiual Ransa Reddy District. *fii,Tl1[lt?';n',[?,,fi ,i,l#gSffi 3"*3:if ft l?ffi i8"T#'fl 8HIXE,gf" 65.G. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar Aged about 35 years'.Occ Agricultule - *' Hil.H:i,6. i:+2, oictrioowti Villa"ge serilingampallv Mandal, R' R' Dist' 66.Smt. G. Susheela, W/o. G. Krishna, fged about 45 years' Occ Houle wife' -" Hilj. nlir"l:i+. G'acnioowri Vittage, SErilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. u'fi :nif ?lai"'Jflr'8#ffi illS;SsS,f, U#;,y"'fi f;3iRl"'J311'JI3fl,1;,,", 68.Smt. G. Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna, Aged about.2g.years' Occ Housewife' Rl/o'. *'il.i,li;i-A'oiiti5o*ri viilage,SeriTingampallv M-andal, Ranga Reddv District

69.G.Jaipal,S/o.G.KrishnaAgedabout2T-years,-OccAgriculture.Ri/o'.H'No'1- ""'i,i, CIJniO"*ti Vitrage, Seriiingampally Mindal Ranga Reddy Oistrict. 70.G. Naveen, S/o G. Krishna, Aged about 25 years Occ Aoriculture FUo.Gachibowli virrage, SEiiiin'g;-nipalry rvtifiait' Ranga-Reddy District'

71.G.Praveen,S/o.G.Krishna,Agedabout23years,occAoricultureRl/o. H.No.1-44, GachibowliViril?"ls?iti"gimGiii t"tahaal Ringa Reddv District'

72.Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District' 73.Spl. Gr. Dy. Collector & RDO, Rajendranagar0ivision (Respondents Nos' 59 - [dzr are not necessary parties iri this CRP MP)

74.M. Suguna Wio Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 54 yrs'' 75.M. Chiranjeevi S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs'' T6.M.MaheshKumar.S/M.SugunaWoLateManikonaYadaiah,aged54yrs.' t74

78.M. Pravaillika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22yrs: AllareR/oH.No.1-S1l6tl.StreetNo.3.Serilingampally,Gachibowli, RangareddY District s5#ll,i8,x'ix'.ft x?i:Pldtsiloff ,'ft1:JrTa$T3??edRseasperco .RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSectionl5lcPCpraylng.tlEtinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit fil,ad in support of the pltition, inJHigtt Court may be pleased to pass an order restraining respondent. h;;;'from irienatingr or creating third party interest in respect 6r rano "o*"r"rli9 1i+734 glt ofhnd in Sv'No'S1(Ac'17- 20gts), Sy.No.S2 ia".is 36 gtsj' 5v'No53 pflt (Ac9-0s'gts) situated in Gachibowri Vir ragl, b"rir in gr*prtty ilrt"ndal, Ranga R.eddy District' Gounsel for tlhe Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 31 & 32 : SR! P' SRt RAM . petitio. uncer gl of A.p. (T.A.) Tenancy and Agdcultural Lands Act, 1950, aggrieved by the orders in case.No. F/54O8 12013' dl' 24'09'2016 on the file of the Joint Collectc,r-|, Ranga Reddy District' Between:

1. G SWr\MY, S/o Late Gadda Balu Linga died per Lrs 2. Gadder Ravider, Sio Late Swamy, aged about 42 years, occ Agriculture' 3.GaddzrDevender,S/oLateSwamy,agedabout3gyearc,occAgriculture. 4.Mohd.Gouse,sloLateMohd.lsmail,agedabout,60years,occAgrl. (All are residents of Gachibowli Village' serilingampally Mandal R'R'Dist' i{yderabad.) 1 't . . . Periitioners No. 2 & ?!rY" been brought on record ?! !-R't of -deceased -''uid-u - -C'o'otl";'}ioii''' Cnpup'No'318o12o17' in oetitioner bTi'Pi'rJ.zaszr2o17 AND 1 . DIAMoND HILLS WELFARE ASSoclATloN, Eep. bv its Secretary Sri. P. Nararrana n"oiv"dt'iu6.P:Y 5,;ibI'it"oov"o io it dnd 38 G' Arun $;;ffits Recf Hilts, HYderabad' 2. V.Suresh Babu, S/o V'P'Babu Rao PETITIONERS 175

3. Mrs. V.Udayini, Wo V.Sudhakar, Occ House wife R o 8€ Nagar, Yusitf Guda, Hyderabad. €15/9A, Maruthi

4. P.V.S.R.Das, S/o. P.V. Subba Rao ( Died perLRIF.Naveen.9o PVSR Das. Fyo 8-3-315/9A, Maruthi Nagar, Yusuf Guda, HSerabad

5. G.Balaiah, S/ o Gadda Maisaiah, occ Agrl. 6. G Shankar, S/o Gadda Maisaiah, occ Agd. 7. G.Chandraiah, S/o Gadda Maisaiah ,occ Agrl. 8. G.Krishna, S/o Gadda Maisaiah, occ Agrl. 9. G.Sukkaiah, S/o Gadda Maisaiah , occ Agrl.

10.K. Shivaiah, S/o Khanamet Balaiah, occ Agrl. 1 1 . M.Yadaiah, S/o lVlanikonda Kondai*r,occ Agrl.

12.G.Gandaiah, S/o Late Darapalli Babaiah ,OccAgr.l. 13.Smt. G.Laxmamma, Wo B.Shankar, Occ Agrl. 'l4.G.Darshan, S/o G.Shankar, occ agrl. 15. G.Suresh, S/o G.Shankar , occ Agd.

16.G.Shiva Kumar, S/ o G.Shankar, Occ Agrl.

17. G.Prakash, S/o G.Shankar,occ Agrl.

18.Smt. G.Susheela, W/o G.Krishna,occ Agrl.

19.G.Sanjeeva, S/o G.Krishna, Occ Agrl.

20.Smt. G.Saritha. Dio G.Krishna, occ Agrl.

21.G.Jaipal, Sio G.Krishna, occ Agrl.

22. G.Naveen, S/o G.Krishna,Occ Agri.

23. G.Praveen, S/o G.Krishna,occ Agrl. (Respondents 5 to 23 are R/o Gachibowl Serlingampally Mandal, R.R.Dist. Hyderabad. Rep. by GPA P.Venugopal Reddy S/o PitchiReddy.

24.The Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy Dist. Hyderabad.

25.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Raiendra Nagar Division, R.R Dist. HyderabadS

26.The Deputy Collector Cum Tahasildar, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.Dist. Hyderabad.

27.The Spl. Grade Dy.Collector & Revenue Divisiqnalfficer, Bejeqdra Nagar Division, Rajencira Nagar, R.R.Dist

28.The Dy. Collector, & Tahasildar, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.Dist. 2g.Authorized Officer Land Reforms, Collectorate, R.R.Dist, Hyderabad. uou=",13?:p3$lf#$s?,1'&klHliim:ry*eila::I';fr l:l'5iifl ** 176 HYerabad. .,'Bilt"nl":.lff H;".J"*l1l?Ir",lffi iifiil,iifr ;gBgf lvrs"occ:Business'R/o (R31 impleaded as per C'O'' dt'28'2'2I22in l'A'No'1/2022) RESPONDENTS t.A. ?-0 17( CRPMP. NO: 3181 oF 20 171 :3OF Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in sup"port-&in"-p"tiiion, th-e High Court may_beplease-d to direct the respondents n"Jii'"Ji to'"f[n"i" tir-e lanO property Ac. 37-16 guntas in Sv.No. 51, 52 53 and n"'i' iiis G'"i"i i1s1 No 37' 40' 42to 45 situated at Glchibowti vi,age, Seritinnil;*[ Gn;"1, R.i. Oistrict, pending disposal of the CRP. Gounsel for the Petitioners : SRI. N SAIDA RAO Cdunsel for tlhe Respondents: NONE APPEARED CIVIL toN PETITION 1 oF 201 Petitiorr Under section 91 of A'P (T'A) Tetancv and Agricultural Lands Act' j"x","au;ffi ,NoF2/606e/20r3 :::*r""'f;:i"',-'JR "+F".,=;t11"tl"k"?fr :::fl "=i-i,*??il;opf Between: District. RZnga ReddY District' 'r,tjli-.3:'3:",111ffi l"$',,f'%io'3ffi x5"1"'ili"fiu"?3[ ' g*S:l.Slr",','tl;.',(?#i'i,?ii:[:"i'3:.?m:',,i&lii"ffi;;''ii'^"HiH'R"Y& 'f :$*1,,:":*H,31'*?^13:,-33,0t"#8'3f,',?nv-CI3::f"Tl*"#'J;""il'"?:i 'rln::l't::'b::'ilu:i"r$i:E*?io'']|fltl*#lt"?il"[L'1'?'ili"ffi 5. Khan.amet Bikshapathi S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 48 yrs'' 6. Khanamet Kumar S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 44 yrs 7. Khanamet Mallesh S/o Late Khanamet Shivaiah' aged 34 yrs iiiid R".iov District' (Died) Ringa Reddy District' Petiticners 5 to 7 are all Agriculturists Rl/o H'No '1-35' Gachibowli' RangareddY District' or the deceased P4 as per C.Sl:lUlA.%i,',',f ,iiLt3[133r[:f* "'LRs ;"?ff ' ' o t77 PETITIONERS AND

1. CHANDOLU SATYANARAYANA, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged about 56 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Plot No.203, Chruva ll, Main Road, Yousufguda, Hyd. 2. Aravapalli Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Late Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Plot No.164, RTC Colony, Vijayawada€. 3. AravapaliVijay Kumari, W/o. Sambasiva Rao, Aged ebryt 59 years, Occ Housewife, IVo. Plot No.164, RTC Colony, Viiayaw.adz.S.

4. Ellina Vijaya Lakshmi, W.o. E. Prasad, Aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife, Ri/o.Flat No.332, Vynateya Apartments , Shyamalangar, Rajmundry, East Godavari - 533 103

5. Nadimpalli Madhavi, W/o. N. Venkatapathi Raju, Aged about 49 yeaF, Occ Houseivife, R/o. H. No.27-B -31 I 1, Srirampuram, Bhimavanam, West Godavari District.

6. Nadimpalli Sarojani Devi, W/o. N.V.R.K. Raju, Aged about 40 years, Occ Housewife. No.27-8-311 1. Srirampuram, Bhimavaram, W.G District. 7. Kunaparaju Padmavthi, W/o. K.S.R.K. Varma, Aged abqq! 44_years, Occ - Housbwife, R/o. 27-8-3111, Srirampuram, Bhimavaram, W.G District. 8. Kunaparaju Siva Rama Krishna Vanna, S/o. K.V.S.S.N. Raiu, Aged about 45 years, Oci Pvt. Employee, R/o. 27-8-3111, Srirampuram, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.

9. Gatiganti Veera Venkataram Prasad, S/o. Late G. Sury3 Prakash-a- Rao, Aged about 48 years, Occ Engineer, Rl/o. M. Sadasavi Rao, Plot No.7, Vasanta , Emerald Gardens, Madhapur, Hyderabad. itr 0. Makkena Brarnmaiah, S/o. late M.Ankamma, Aged about 56 years, Occ Pvt. : Employee, Fl/o.Flat No.201, Sai Durga Towers, H.No.7-16211291. S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad. l l.Kantamaneni Syamaladevi, W/o. A. Satyanarayana,Aged about 69, years, Occ Housewife, R/o. Plot No.62, Balari SwamapuriColony Enagadda, Hyderabad

12. Muddapati Anupama, W/o. M. Surendra, Aged about 36 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. 301, Ravi Teja Apartments, H.No.283/3RT S.R. Nagar Hyderabad

13. Medasani Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Late M. Subbaiah, Aged about 67 years. Occ Retd. Emploee, R/o. H.No.1-4-76, Flat No.102, HimavathiApartments, Street No.8, Habsigtida, Hyderabad.

14. Musunuru Jyothirmayi, Wio. M.V. Krishna Rao. Aged qlout 59 years-, Occ Housewife, [Vo. Flat No.104, Mahamoob Apartments Yousufguda, Hyderabad - 45.

15. Kapisthalam Sundara Chari, S/o. Late K. Rajagopala Chari, Aggd about 57 yeirs, Occ Accountant, No.24-45, Upstairs, LakshminagBreobny, 2nd Street, Chittoor - 517001 l6.Chintakunta Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. C. Bala Reddy, Aged about 38 years, Occ Employee, Rl/o. H.No.5-9-22144, Ground Floor, Opp Rock Garden Park, Adarshangar, Hyderabad. ".r : ..r:.::.st-1Ua:E:IEffilUrS{5.-\:I:' i ;n:: j1,: : .. 178 lT.SunkaraSambasivaRao,St-'-+!I*S'MadhusudhanRao'Agedabout49 vears. .ooc euSil#J'H[' ls-teoli' seetharamnagar colonv' L"#;;d;ti alim, xrram mam Distritt'

18.J.Jhansi'S/o.J.Ramakrishna,.Asg{;rbout31yeals,OccDoctorR/o'HiG.A-. ' "' ;i; #.X.blnio Nagar, secunderabad' 1g.A. Sainandana, D/o.-A Jevaorakggh, fo.ed. 399-{ 28 yea-rs' occ Housewife' R/o. Ftat uo.zdrl',iddt !-f6[1g--G, Mog tt;l raj pura m, Vla- 1 0 -l ^L^..1 C.l rr^aro f lr^r' ?iB'?-% 'oEilL13;d!i'€,1:?Ii?8'bP',;"f[[1tr9'fi?*A??:''"]'ffi ,,Rfoo.l:,?b:Bg:f,1fi3ll;rhfl lli'tlr**ffi 3:?3*53vears'occBusiness' e' "Ril?i3i'Ri3T3r5fnl:l*6[?ii'8ffi:tXB,','l9l#B:loccHousewif ,H,:am?ryffi *??;f,nf 3S'3"#f t',f, 3J3;3'iio[?$'il ,.RiSfr [,iffj'fl

74. j"'

24.KollaVelnkataRavindran4,.g/o.LateK.V.Krishnaiah'Aqedabout39years, occ Dor:tor, ny"'lrj'j,iiG.zoa A#fi 'R.;;il ;;v, H. No. s z -I 0 -32, R.v. parem, VisakhaPatnam - 13' ,uB3gpJijpi,:?llffi%ijft R;itg:,-.',+ff t'[??$ffi'"s:fi ,tiirt?il:r?'i; Secunilerabad-26'

26.DuwurrVenkata Sub-b?..|=qITi'W/o' D'V'S' S'arma' Aged about 69 years' Occ ' "' H ; ; ;ifi i.-, itlgJ5fr 16l Vtn(ata nasar' Hvd e ra b a d - 8 ,rH,1110;:!:ffitlf

23.RavunrTarabayamm4,-W9.,R'VenkateswaraRao'AqedaboutT6years' ,t3""i[T53l""%ffifi*i-t"?li.uf, IsshooccRetdEmprovee' Occ H'usewife, R/o. 402, ltirmaia"toile's,-O*ut'kaprjri Colony' Paniagutta' Hydererbad - 82.

29.R.VerrkateswaraRQg,S/o..RM.C.V.PrasadRao,Agedabout56years,occ Businerss, nyo. +bZ, Nirmala To;;t='' Dwarakapuri Colony Paniagutta' HYder;rbad -82' "- d; Housewife, iVo'H'No'6-3- 30MaddtrriKamara,we,Pr.Y,%??,i,N:t'*?:1["t111,,it"";|;inl{"ltvears'

31.Madd.rri Mahesh, S/o..Re.'.[t,Veera Eqo-!9v9-neddv "C6. -r H : i,t'".0"-I-60 7l lA, ka p ao i I t- 5 n e' S o m ai i g u d a' Aged thout 44 vears' HYderabad - 82. occ F,vr. ="lfi#J, Hyderabad -82. Pvt. E:m Hyde

32.Madduri Hari, S/o. Dr. M.Veera -82 33 Yarlagadda VijaYa Lakshmi, W/o' ;;;;: o* Houiewife, Rllo' 9'No i'iTai,'a ncna, Kharirmam District' Reddy, Aged about 5 /A, Kapadia Lane, Somajig 1 years, Occ uda, Y. Poorna Chandra Rao, Aged about 51 .A-9, Nova nagar, SllL CamPus Post, r79 .o.{?.pe!e,'ogii3,[gi]ffi #J";-{:ffi tgil1fi,$tllilA#,:HiE: 3sp,ttqsamta5illr?3B;Y:,,H8#,1$j&1,iffi 3?ffi :"'occBusiness' * 3:PIH,ffig',*,r3'3;f"#3:,X3:11*,*BS'fi :f,S,1fl'Ifi3f*ff*Rll' "xr;:glliit:Hf,:Yili:'h[]sffi%:'ik#g#"t'JJ":ffi;n?i0""[?'*' HYderabad.

38.chinrakr.rntaN"..e"ieli5ftdj,vtuTir"-,Ii?li$3,i:'#?:t*6ts$sff [3r n?ljx;,?fr 5[[113 53lfo o'u o', 'n33[S,?*],x:pXi'5ff l,:i1&3&:H:il*t]1*"l$*'ffi"j60vears'occ *5f; lfg"g*ii:?:::f, ,?iill[]I{:r[J,i:85f, :Hs?:x'fi 3S$i':",?"rs'oc, -'ffi ff $,?::H[:#i%I,i-Y"*:15fiX*fl ait^f i5'Yflu*I3f, f;33t*' "f,"'[:38:'L::X53:hf T-?%3JiiS'3,'J35fi '$l"X]f':XY#"*o"e:?*'o 6jo-n1y, Xn"it"tabad, HYderabad' ffil,g.;$E #Jl i,?i33&,YH'?{#SHffi #t'ist".:'"fl ftffi?B:i.*' about 54 Years, Occ Girija Eswar Resiclency' "gHiE*:ffi Hffii[t,r'Y^rse:i??F"".1"t *'B?:'fi8sg$i,5:8fl :,oRx'!-yi1&fi i'8:tE''lft 3i'l*1'?o'"1Tij-ufol"""' *fi i[:$i][,'ffi1ir?.?r;"5#,lg;tft ,',lB?1ffi .r,133fl 33?liLii#B3f;,"* iiingi Redov District - 5oo o5o' i<triiratauao, HYderabad' '*1n{,1'#:S3i3},".,',',31"-i3l?;I#,t?".ieffi o'B?:ii333;i,?,[]H;Hi?;5-'H385]?11ty3;1ffi 3"t"X"rf i,?'"-Bl52vears' *.x?%Y'!'l'"J33["0;?S'83* *E::fl i"Y::WSlEi;if;?.3iil1'#'':e%3:'?:'1?"'11"1?J'"f; Hyderabad - 500 033' iE;?ii*' *33g::"J;Xi?3[ilift :H:"3,ffi T'i"lli*3?lf 3flt13t'l'??ll;u'nT'n'nu' UIii,"v, ffixriPallY, HYderabad - 72' u'HTSilft AmeerPet, HYderabad ' ":[iy?,S'$;Io3,"R:5[i:nffi i,f"n""ffi"'l'Y"""?Jfi fl ?3ff^ 180 urEIifu F,lni*larT*i[]#fl.*,SS#r:R"i5'f,?.Jfi u. f [1{3"AHll #;iS*#?1, aX*,*J.H: :fi,I?3,t'"?cc *6,e[?Hf .,ru.yjBAF-Y""RT,*ff y?i3ff "AfiS':ir:Hout54vears'occ 3[";'3ff o?octor'R/o Do cto r' Fuo Vii ava u u x,: :&3filH],r1flflc,btm+fta+rffi "-9 f b" ut 3e ve a rs' o cc H o u sewif e' uuEi:f#,:f $3:?[-iY3]:i3f i[3f 3tl?"ff ,$iilF]..?"'t3h""?l,uun"Ii3f;u11" H;hkijnda, Warangal' u'P,#,?,rrXS3?l?,"-r?at'F[$"ffi 11],?:Rfl S'"""'ffi ff ili'-?!"oo'' uuF39s33:$?gT*['is-?ri6?#.1"{K13,?t1ftivf; Guntur District' ''?':" '""#,"8"#91Jf;ffi 5eKankarrraViiav"aLaks$li*J:it?tfr #;Yir"-l3rt?,11fi '"*llfs":,i,HHt?3,. Years, Clcc H 'oA)';+ilKHR-[tt,?JliEi,Uige?kiJ#::3J'"'T,i"P"XXR'8"'Y3:v'Hvd u,AiXyiJlflt3:fl-?at;tHi;H,daft3ii3l?,1lf3,€31?s?ii.,33s,?-i'F8nJil?il' Hydrab;rd 62 Hlitiiiiils,ffifuTfrleL$,f Gowri, Wo l. Rama Krishna, aged- ria:it i6.ao2, Purushotham E

63.1 R/o. Khairatabad, V. Rama Raiu , Sri Sai Datta , aged about Apartments, 73 years, East 5# about 60 Years, OcC Housewife' nclave. Anandnagar,

64.Aisha l(hatoon'

65.Sheeler Madhusudhan, ${o-' Qhankara House'nrife, Fl/oHti*I$i%f$:L:31::tr'ff ?9,:B%11fl'"1if; li:3f'" Rao' aged about 46 years' Occ s usin6rSS, wo.Hri[ili;.io}; s ie"n'ir"ra Ap a rth e n ts, V a n a sth a li p u ra m' tffi il;;6;A R";A' iirdiranagar' Hvderabad 66. N. Prasanna, W/o' M' {margnder' aged about 43 years' Occ Housewife' R/o. 4- B-1 3s, dliEi.ISiiiiii, Nir"t, 61--,'iri g rd i. nu'n ri/a nd i r' Hvd - 1 2' 67. Ungarala V.V'N' Kris-[rn3. Fag. S/o'Late U'P' Swamv aoed about 52 years' occBusin"""livJ.'Frat-r'id']0r"S'V]'Fui'H"'u"n'baitatrevaNagar' X;ffi,s;;; nv-o-"*139 : -- uux?tTlsss#*::'nraH!"I.[b,Yf :ril*I:i',Illsl?.113t?l?:'^'.:J""€:' Fii'i,'utiJN;;il;5i'cunderabad - 50006 1 6e . c how d avaram J hansi Ra t!,lrylo' M S'r' Ra m neo oyr, occ tlo u s"*'i"l nii' 1 i :1 -ib t t7l8' S a raswa th i n a g : St i$re??Yt*t1'""t' o* t8l

70.Derugula Eedaiah, S]b. D. S.anjaya, aged about 62.years, Occ Business, Rl/o' C/o. D. t ta rasimlii, -O pb-S n-i p"' (pd rtrients, Ko nd ap u r Villiage, S e ri l i n g a m pa l ly Mandal, R.R. District.

71.Mannem Manorama, wo. M. Krishna Mohan-Reddv agedSpu| 60 years' ' "t ;CErploieC, FUo.'Flat No.401, Swapnika Heavens Apartments, upp Xl;-6f,;'g;'Hisi'd;hod,L Gtv"n Nrgrt Phase-1, Hvderabad - 38' T2.Tunuguntla Tara Sesha Kuqqri, !v/o, Latq T. UgeSdraG-upta, aged about 56 vears. occ HouEJ*ii",-nyii- iLoi tlo-tol,_centrdl Part-ll Apartments, Dharam Kaiarir Road, Balkampet, Hyderabad - 16' T3Battina.levaqieJ#fro6.Btf Housewife, R/c ,T,"ftHiiti,Tih,f,Y##"#'3i/,"'ifr ,o[3'fsfl Kondapur, HYderabad. l,T'[,T[lEli[:#6iIi9r1'Jr31E'fiffS,1:?:tfl :#B?'ILP3%,",,, 'ufl,Tr?jl!iliiYfi,ti3l,Hiltii,t1?SHLitl3if;'P,"j.;'[li1?"3lhr, Hyderabad.

76.A.V.M. Raju, s/o- A.Y.N. Raju,.aged about 43 years, occ software Engineer' '" 'Ci;. A-i'Oi,'St SiiOitta Apirtfrents, East Srinivasa Nasar Colonv, Hyderabad Srinivali Nalar Colony, Hyderabad' "BB3*1?3:L:iY'fi "i?,HX?H,iI3f Tg.lnampudi Gowri, w{q._l.Eamq KrishnE about 60 years, occ Housewife, R/o' ' - 6:i-G2ei4,H;t il6:4b2; prirusnotnm Enclave, Ana nd n ag a r' Kh a i rata bad' Hyderabad. Bil3'y65il15fl 5;i*?1.1:?T'1'vears'

79.Aisha Khatoon, wo. Ahmed Abdul Haleem.-Aged.about 49 years,.occ '" iiJrJ"*i6, R6. H:N*.;.b-inoi,-rtlo=jrzahi Mirket, Desi Hospital, Hvd' "" B;;iri;t'i, nyo.Ft"t iiiii.toi, Sreeniva.sa Apa.rtments, Vanasthalipuram' S0.SheelaMadhusudhan,S/o.ShankaraRao,agedibgyt46years'Occ M;;ritbad Road, lndiranagar, Hyderabad'

81. N. Prasanna, Wo. M. Amarender, aged about 43 years' Occ Housewife' R/o' 4-B-135, Sreelas-tiiiin iltirai, bowt'r6uOa, Ram Mindir, Hyd -12

82. Ungarala V.v.N. Krishna Ra9. p/o. Late U.P. Swamv, aged about 52 years, Occ Busin""", iVd.'Ffii Uo.tOl. S.V. Raja Heaven Dattatreya Nagar, Asifnagar, HYderabad

33.Yarlagadda seethamahalaxq! wo. Y. Krishna Rao,. aged. about 56-years, Occ Housewif;'Fi/d :'6-i:-t3rid, Flat No. 202lA, Pa ncha vath i Apa rtme nts, piOmarao Nagir,r, Secunderabad - 500061'

34.Chowdavaram Jhansi Rani, -w{o M.S.T. Ram Reddy,qged ?bo.ul33,years, occ HoUS"*iie-d,Hi5. il-i:zg{tiiri.-saras*"thinagai, saidaoad, Hvderabad - 59.

35.Derugula Eedaiah,Slo.D..S..anjava, aged about 62 years,.occ Business, R/o. C/o. D. Narasifr'lii, Opp Sf,Jtpa'Apd,rt'ients, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandhi, R.R. District' t82

86.r. Leela F'Er.sad, s/o' tv 4nierry$'.iP.%1,H,:HJ,f$fr' occ Software ""'ihgin;r, nvo.sTtt' o" .:_o"l: Business, wo.?ioil.r?.bs,' Sied Nilayam Apts, Dbmalaguda, ST.NukalaR;adhikaReddy,-Wo.N..SreedharReddy.agedabout5Tyea 88.Raoot Sarala, Wo. Krisln9-rya1aY?na Root' aged about 69 years' Occ Retd' "".L;.,;"6Gi, Hi". i7_i:i6ciio,i A, vTniva_Nisar, saidabad, Hyd. Bg.Sunkara rHarshita, DIo. Prameela, aged about 28-years, occ student' Rl/o' Ptot No.2UA, d'6i#i d;ffi;hil t't?s;r' Yousufiuda' Hvderabad' 9o.Shankar, S/o. Harichander, aged about 56 years, Occ Govt. Service, R/o. ""' ,'Flg:Krgli?sff 3','*3:g[la:[1''#:k5,[f"Xtx5^i"tff3'1S:S:"?t SiiT'1 02'0, Sanathnagar, Hyd-erabad' rrs, occ

058. nrS3l?:ifl lilil[S1T'rYSi,?,t/#$'&n::€3:J",ffi Hyoerao'ld - 500 034. {t"6"d,fl"?fiiiy"" -Fy;.?b'r,"tifii; g3.Jasti Narcndra Babu, s]o. .l M Das, aged about 58 vears, occ Employee' Fl/o' G - 1, Verrkat ?ilIfrii EJt'rt"i, SuilittE-tl igar, Kukatpallv' Hvderabad' Employ.,", ny6'Fult'Ni]S, jrin A?i*nlGil 6lsing colonv, Kondapur, Hvd'

94.KazaJ3'y2Frak3sh,S/o_K.LeeladharaF?o'.agedabout2Tyears,occ g5.Chalicharm NaEeswara $9o.,.S{o. CH Seshaiah,.aged about 64 years, occ t iim i iowe rs' Retd . ern poGI ilrLli'.R:trTEH'"PJ9;5ESffiR*#ff 8fti"":''i,ff +ffi ?"?""&lElPlffi il,, Hyderatrad - 500082' 97.K Vijaya. Kumar, S/o. K Kota!a!, aged about 52- years, occ Employee' Rl/o' c/o. K s;vami'5u"nii;H;, E rzlE Lab Qtrs, Kinchanbagh, Hvd. gS.MarellaRaianiKumari-,^Slo'VijayaKumar'ag-edabout5lyears'Occ Emotoyr:e, Ry;: ci"Iitsv;il d;,i.iii ndo,E 27te, Lab citrs, Kanchanbagh, Hyrieritrad - 500 058' L alwve rp et, O ns o I e' e6'ffi . "[:'ln:tiey{i"*]:H'-3.?]E?f fl [1[:ffi :,?:33'1ffi ;:ti,i,?l's'occ 100. Gutlarpalli lndu MadhSv!!V./o' G' Epq aged about'39 vears' Occ Housewife,'ilH i;i6iitt-rislA, Fr"i tio.G-e' samskruti Palace' MLA colonv' ii;Iil'|".i2,-aZniaia Hills, Hvderabad - 500 034' l0l.NirmalaReddy,W/o.SQbylaReddy,agedabout65years,occBusiness, R/o. 91 0/5,'tfliid.iiorat tteights, Mahovikas N ag a r' Secbad' lo2.CheirnaUmaRani.W.lq.C.N.KesavaChand,aqedabout4gyears,occ Emptoyee, iU;.'ilt-bgi[t, fiui:rliiZOs, Sai Ram Siri Sampada Apts' Leela ftf idar, eegumPet, HYderabad'

103. K Strrya Rao, S/o. letg.xgyaliVenkata Subba Rao, aged about 54 years, occ EmptoG;: H6 1 6-li-sl i6la7, Sr,itirrhana Nagarl Dilsukhnasar' Hvd 183

104. Gullapalti Satyanarayana, S/o. Venkata Subbanna, aged about 71 _yeqrs, OccRetd. Employee, RUo. 6-1-6912, Flat No.202, .G K P Mansions, Saifabad, Hyderabad-500004.

105. Chagarlamudi ltishna, S/o.C Madhustrdhan Rao, aged about 49 years, oOcc Employee, R/o.Plot No.17, 36-136/28, Defence Colony, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad.

106. Makam Subbarameswara Setty, S/o. Late M Chavanna Setty, aged about 64 years, OccP--rivatesenice, F{/o. LIG 45, Type-f, Udayanagar Colony, B K Guda, S.R. Nagat Hyderabad. 1O7. Kasulavada Latha, Wo G. Krishna Rao, aged about 39 years, Occ Housewife, R/q. 1O-2-289l12Ol5,Flal No.30l, Laxmi Teja Homes, P S Nagar, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad.

108. Palakotanu Narayana Reddy, S/o. P V Subba Reddy, aged about 76 years, Occ Agricultute, Rlo. H.No.5-9-22, Flat No.42, Maheswari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderdbad

109. Obbineni Ramanianeya Reddy, S/o.0 Jaya Rama Reddy, aged about42 vears, Occ Employee, Fi/o. H.No.5-9-22, Flat No.42, Maheswari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hydenabad.

110. Palakolanu Sourbhagyamma, Wo P. Narayana Reddy, aged about 71 H. No.5-9 -22, Flat No. 42, Maheswa ri Residency, years, Occ Flousewtfe, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad. -R/o.

111. lsanaka Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o. Venku Reddy, aged about 54 years, Occ Employee, R/o. H.No.$9-22, FlatNo.42, Maheswari Residency, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad.

112. Gadda Sankar, S/o. Maisaiah, Occ Agricutture Fl/o. H.No.1-38/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist

113. Gadda Krishna, S/o. Maisaiah, Occ Agriculture, R/o. H.No-1-38/1, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist.

114. Syed Kareem, Slo" Khaja, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

115. Md. Ghouse, S/O. late Md. lsmail, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

116. Md. Yousuf, S/o. late Md. lsmail, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village,' Serilingarnpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Di stri ct.

117. Md. Wazir, S/o. late Khasim Ali, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampatly Mandal; Ranga Reddy District

118. Md. Wazeer, S/o. late l$asim Ali, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 1 19. Manikonda Yadaiah, Slo. late Manikonda Kondaiah, Aged 52 years, Occ Agriculture;ff/o;thtrla1147l1, Gachibowii, Serilingamaplly, R.R. Dist.(Died per LRs Rangareddy 147 to 151) 12O. D. Gandaiah, S/O. late Darapalli Babaiah, Aged 62 years, Occ Agrl. R/o. H.No.1 -5611, Gachibowli Village, Serilingamaplly, R.R.Dist.

121. Mr. Babaiah, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. r84

122. Swarny, S/o. late Bala Lingaiah Occ Agricutture, R/o.Gachibowli Mllage,, Seriling ampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

123. Srnt. tiantamma, Wo. late Balaiah, Occ Agriculturc, Wo. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

124. Gddda Yeftaiah, S/o. Gadda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Occ District. R/o. Gachibowli

125. Gadd;r Narsiinha, S/o. Gadda Lakshmaiah, Occ-Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal. Ranga Reddy District.

126. Madiga Pentaiah, S/o. late Veeqiah, O_ccAg{cqlture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-

127. Smt. G. Laxmamma,Wlo. B. Shankar, Aged about 60 years, Occ Houserarife, R/o.H.No.1-44, Gachibowli (V), Seritingampally (M), R.R. Dist.

128. G. Darshan, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 41 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No. 1 -44, Gachibowli Village, Seritingampally Mandal, Dist. .R.R.

129. G. Suresh, S/o. G Shankar, Aged about 39 years,.Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.2-621218,124, Gachibowli (V), Serilingampally (M), R.R. Dist.

130. G, Shiva Kumar, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 37 years, Occ Agrcul. R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist.

131. G'. Prakash, S/o. G. Shankar, Aged about 35 HiNo.1 -44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally R/o.

132. Smt G. Susheela, W/o. G. Krishna, Aged about 45 years, Occ House wife, R/o. H. Nlo. 1 -44, Gachibowli Viilage, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist.

133. G. Sanjeeva, S/o. G. Krishna, Aged about 32 years; Occ Agriculture R/o, H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R"R.Dist.

134. Smt. (], Saritha, D/o. G. Krishna, Aged about 29 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H. lrlo .1 -44.,.Gachi bowli Village, Serilingampally. Mandal, RR. Dist.

135. G. Jaipal. S/o G.Krighna, Aged about 27 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist.

136. G. Naveen, S/o. G. Krishna, Aged about 25 yearc, OccAgriculture R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist.

137. G. Praveen, S/o. G. Krishna, Aged about 23 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. H.No.1-44, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. Dist.

138. Spl. C;r. Dy. Collector & RDO. Rajendranagar Division, -

139. Smt. l'.l. Sabha Rani, W/o. N. Vijaya Kumar, Aged 45 years, Occ House wife, Rl/o. Plot No.40, Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli, R.R. District. 14O. V. Ralendra Prasad, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 53 years, Occ Business R/o. 11r1, SRT, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. tZt. V. Prerbhakar Reddy, S/o. V.D. Rama Reddy, Aged about 50 yearc, Occ Busine..;s, R/o. 8-3-31 5/3A, Maruthi Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. .

142. K. Ra'Jha Krishna t\4urthy, Sio. K.N. Sastry, Aged Employee, R/o. Anand Nagar Colony, Khairatabad, about 70 years, Occ Rtd. Hyderabad. 185

143. Mr. B. Jhansi l-akshmi, S/o. Vasu Deva Rao'Aged- abo-ut-S5 years' Occ *"'d;b6G; r,iii.i Tb' re-tucom Nagar, Ga'hi bo\^'li' R'R' Dist' -iiiii ' :ftE. 144- Diamond Hitlswetfare Association, Rep. by its secretary sri P. Narayana ' ' ' Redai S o. hte P'V. Subba ReddY

145.M/s.Kastopa**"r,!ifi 5{-57' Top Floor' Kam ;[ilsH,5""H"r".:f #ll5if fi ,rSKamdarRi/o. 1,16. Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District', (Respor 139 to 143 are not necessary parties ln mls uKr, dents No. 112to 137 and Agriculture

147. M.Suguna Wo Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 54 yrs'' Occ: House Wife 148. M. Chiranjeevi s/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah, aged 40 yrs', occ: Agriculture 149. M. Mahesh Kumar S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 34 yrs'' Occ: 150. M. Srikanth S/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 35 yrs'' Occ: Agriculture 151. M Pravallika D/o Late Manikonda Yadaiah' aged 22 yrs'' (Resoondent No.147 to 151 are brogght on.. recrrrd as LRs of deceased p-gr court'order dated H:""i6fidHi'ui;.iiij i-.8' ""rvi"'tl-"al-VZqllit''..as bYtSoii, t,ii-r.ilHo.t bt i-oZo mioe in cRP' No 3160 ot 20171 RESPONDENTS l.A. NO:1 OF 2017(CRPMP. r4168 ()F 201 7l Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that rn the circumstances stated in tne affroivit ned in support of the petitidn, ine High.court may be pleased. to pass pTty an order restraining tne responolnts herein from alienating or creating t'.t9- i"Li"-"ii,i *.pea[1 rana.i.""iutlng Ac.42-24 gts of land in Sv'No' 51(Ac'17- ;6;iils;.fi:srinc-rs-eosG)'ry:rlo--sc pt't glgrsloaotsl situated in Gachibowli Vilfu;, Slrilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District IA NO: 10F20 18: Between:

1. CHANDOLU SAWANARAYANA' S/o' Venkateswarlu Aoed about 56 vears' occ Business, R/o. Plot ffi]idd'bri"ia'ii' ffiin Road' Ydusufsuda' Hvd' ,iJ:K:S'lt'ffi:iiJJaF,?.?id,hiiH:[+s'3s''e?l0#,%?1,i.""-11' .fi ,.#T,,?liJu#"-Jgit#6?,?18.8:',:X|il j&ffi,1S::dl5evears'occ 'Eli3"Ylifl,"-'3F[tlli#.ir=1,ii#htffi 1"3:i.':3fl iffi ;"",ii' iiiimrnorv, rast GodaGii - 533 103 'Hi::m:,H?Snfi ',liy/?:#.Y,?:S'tr#$l':3f #ffi ffi?:Hl't'?J'1'&f#n District. 186 fl Sffil:l'ef 6ffi ,#t?fl;'I{?,Hud$$SllihiiSL??:'Sf J3?["""* 7. Kunaparaiu Padmavth!, W/q ['S'R'K: Vaqlq' Aged about 44-y-ears' Occ Ho usewifrr, nyo]'i7-ti-ii i i, S ti*iidiirLm, enimaVaram, W'G District' 8. Kunaparaiu Siva Rama Krishna Varygr.$/q' [:V:9:S'N' Raju' Aged about 45 vears, 0c,: Pvt. Employee, R/o' it]ii:il n'sriiimpurarn' Bfiimavaram' west Godavari District' v g.GatigantiVeeraVenkataramPrasa4.s/^o.LateQ,FurvaPrakashaRao,.Aged No T' Vasa nta -Prot n-vi Rao, eHJ..,,1$ i:#S:fr 5[flJ]",T,,ryS#;ii: 1 0. Makkena B ramma iah, S/o. Iate .M -Ankamma, onqt Emolovee, nv".'irli-rtib''0i, Sai Durua Towers' H'l Nadar, FYderabad 39-1tf3iri3t' 3. R: t" 1 1 . Ka ntamer n en i ' ' ' ij;;'i$ise*itel nvo' ptot No'02' Balart Swamaput Sya m a I ad evi, wro. A. satvanarava"?'4?&irf;5[330 Il"=' . HYderabad HYderatrad. fifl,fi3r?H,13]ffi31i;, t4.MusuntrruJyothirmayi,W&'n4.Y.KrishnaRao,Agedabout5gyears,occ " HSSS?: H:i3il," ffi +[i:X;"ihii.?#,t ftf'ltS8il?Tfft:n"' . 1 3. Med qsa n i Raie nd ra prasad,. g/o - Late M' sumare!, occ Rer.d e*"prii.!. ruo' H'1lo '1-4-76' Flat No'101 5ti""i lr" a' Hhosiguda, Hyderabad' Housevrife, nii 'Eiri'Nio.i04;M;#]#b-ApEriritiinti Vousufsu-da' Hvderabad - 45. 15. Kapistl-ralam SunrJara Clqri, S/o' Late K' Bai?ggpala Chari; Aged about 57 veirs, ,:"" nJ"lul.i;;t" Rv;: ,+:+s,-u-p.r"rirsl u-atisrrminagar colonv' 2nd 3ffi;i, bnittoor - s17oo1 Emplo'1ee, R'"k; H i6 s'g-iilqq' Ground'Flool o Aodrstiangar' HYderabad' l6.chintar<unta Bhaskar Reddv^,,9/o'C' Bala Reooy,es;0"?:3:133"'B3ii:o""

17. Sunkara Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Late s. IVladhusudhan Rao' Aged about 49 vea rs. o"" A Jl',"n;;r,'Ry;.-1q-l -OO,lt, Seetharamnagar Colony, bllii r.nitam. Khammam District' 18.J.Jhansi,S/o.J.Ramakrishna,.Aged?hut3{years,occDoctorR/o.HIG-A- '" ii;'D; A b- nro Nagar, Secunderabad' 19.A. Sainandana' D/o' A Jayaprakqqh'lgSd. abo-Y! 28 years' Occ Housewife' 20. Pand;rri Jayadeepti, D/o.' P-'S',Pulla Rao' lgep about 31 vears' Occ Emptr>yee rii ;?-h:5ro rrrrln Offid;i n-Vdersuaa, Hvderabad-2e' 21. Sabbeneni Sowriralu, S/o. s. AnthaiatL Aged ab6ut 53 years, occ Business' R/o FIat N" Z?rIr-otuJf5wers, frltogtdlraipuram, Vja-10 rvo.,t2-748:6-if'' t'i"b'i' utulali' Hyderabad - 40'

22.B.Bl^lagyamma,Wlg.L"l".B,KotaiahAgedabout6Tyears,occHousewife' Rl/o. !:lat No.202' H-No' 3-4-5f iq'gat<atpura' Hyderabad' i I 187 23poBabv€aro j'l1g,,.aN,Xy?"#?ffi #e?;f,tr*3?lJf.6l'fi3Ei$fi ,t#r"#"'

74. *.^"'t.#"Jff EyHBt1iS?,3a?$ VisakhaPatnam - 13.' j,ifi $J;S:1ffi:tlq#.?*dL:?Iffi f ' *Bx3flJiHi":?l]{ifllio3'fi R;i8v,iBffi ['m.d'1m3'T'*"?i'%'#:'ffi Secunderabad-26. "Ex[:[,,Yi,"4il:nlx-of.?'lfiT;Hi%?;Y;",;i?EHA?T'"bout6evears'occ Venkatesh, Aged about 68 years, Occ Retd' Employee' 27. Gardens, Gudimalkapur' HydeEbao' S/o. Sai R/o. 2 "3:x'is,'.ffi33Y?ffi iay',ft r,*;Yf +5il8i{fl fi,}:fu i8Fodr"$,';'"'ffi i"' H$erabad - 82. *hYi353l?iX1!?,I1fr #i';iS:'Y'Sffi'gt$1?8Sffi F#::8"ff * Hyderabad - 82. hava ReddY, Lane, about 75 years, 8S8f.Tt5fifl :#1ft R! Y:-"??ii Hyderabad - 82. /A, rs, Occ * "333gUHi,::[3j?i,Ii,K.Y,ffi &?q]iY?.ffi'f#ffi s,t'""#:i3,ffi Hyderabad - 82. Hyderabad - 82. "Hf,lE1l,i"il;?';;J',ix;Y;gtftq?i:ft S?19'.Xsn"":33fi*i?1'I:1E'o* 33.Yarlagadda Viiaya Laks-hmi, W/o' Y' Poorna Chandra Rao' Aged about 51 vears. occ Housewrte, tili'.'o tld n-s' Novanagar' SllL campus Post' Faiiv'ancna' Khammam District' 'o{?H#BfJHS,[lili:'#Jl;i'XtS?t1',X1fi'$tilXli*ffi :':BiH: 'uEHi93U1?5:dl,',lS,B"Y3lli^1lEll*ht.g,i$'iryJ:g?ffi 36.Sumku Rangaiah, S/o. Aswadhamaiah'.Aged.aboul 79 vears' Occ Govt' servant Dental Surseori"il;:Ni;;; M';iitiiiitvtirtet' Nindhvala' KNL' :*'occBusiness' 'H3l:tzli"',.rH,1:'iiYi,31?lY, |&1ffi?ti'ali#a'"ft1x'"1,1',ii:ifdlr?ff"["jli Hyderabad.

38.cmnta8$?|lifj,Elli,Sr.".".,rn?li3-i%1"11U?,?181fl 31Lff 8l#,fr:lt'* f.tagai, HYderabad - 500 028'

39.Gonda Nageswara Rao' S/o. Ch. Sudhakar Red.dv, Aoed about 60 years, Occ * Xjttlittitl-{6. H.No.i:i-ii sth, e"tkampet' Arheerpet' Hvd' 188 Ananda Charita' Wo- K. Venu Babu, Emplo)ree , R/o.H.No. 7-1-21rcn, K. @.

41.Kota Housewifr:, R/o.

42. fj*13::'5:il,l3:1H"3-&3i?i b".Ti,iiv, i:t6.tabad, Hyderabad' Occ Occ District. K. Radha Krishna MurthY s6, Opp SBH Branch, about 44 Nagar *E:1g,,#111,#Jlal._33|i,tss#38ffi '#,'fr1"1?:'"fl {,"i&?8ffon,, ktriiratat,ao, HYderabad' 443:i-;1i'ffi'rfi:1"d,'y31T,'il.fi9:?iqrf ?:"tulsrtab.l3i583'y""'"RSo"&",' *B?:',i8f *fi S',li#:$ru:'f nxl-Ii"t$iff '8:fl ,E"Ift 3"1s'11;b'i$-544+1""*' iHB*i[,'ffi1il?i,:3#,*fr Y;ilB'nX,[13'":3#3T,.iii3X,lB?f;,"* iiinsa RedOV Oistrict - 500 050' -' g?nJ?o"i: S?3Y/a:1 3:& 3i?;C#' E??i yea Occ Govt.

48. PonnaP:rlli Lakshmi' Occ Hdr-rsewife, Rl/o Wo. P.S .H.No .e-4-8612941 Rao, Aged about 52 Years, Salarjung ColonY' Hyd{. *E::$"Y11:H93lF[tSft ?of ifl !1??9'*e%i:'::'1?"fi

50. Hyderab'ad - 500 033' Gooinerri Ratna Kumari, !/o' G' Eiii"*ire. Rl/o. Plot No.4o, oPP Coronv, kr.iratPallY, HYderabad - Ramesh, Aged about 55 Venkateswara Temple 72. ""11J'"3'l]?ffn' Occ u'I:Tsfl jpy?,#',i;Io3:Rt5f, :'llfi ifi%'l;:f; H'.'"?Jfr t:?8f'"' Ameerpet, HYderabad' u'PIiluS'",$1?lii3{lr}PXsilS:*,Sff 3r:Rf;',in1,u,.J33fi ,o;lDoctor'Fuo Doctor' R/o Vijava u' [ il,J:.'A#r: #;3HX["[?l A'^*ATH::$,f3[fcc *8,S"[?:E3V]"Yii;A':,..Y""1,T,?:fi yils#":'Ai3,i'io3o*l*54vears'occ bout 3e vea rs' occ Ho usewire' u u X,: :'fi ;llil##ic LiHil[r%1i$33:9f *5:li"t,::&""1?["J3]:i3l3r{3f StS"Xi,B,?l'i}Stt3h?[1',i"1?1F;'fl I u':del,s"ltil?"".,?,{'F::lffi t""L?3ft *,$i#lj3i"iff i'-?BE"' Hinamkonda' Warangal' 189 SS.Goginenti Radliakrishna, S/o. V. Ven PrivateSeryice, Wo 18-15-9, 1ffi114, Gunfur District. katappaiah,.aged about 64 yearp, Occ Nidubrolu Mllage, .Ponnaru Mandal, S9.Kankanala Vrjaya Lakshmi, Wo.Late K. Veena Anjaneyulu, aged about 63 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. 1 -9-1 0, lGpra MllageandMuniclpality, R. R. Dist.

60.Alluri Srilatha, Wo.A.S.M. Raju, aged about 43 yearc, Occ Housewife, R/o.Flat No.A-101 , Sri Sai Datta Apartments, East Srinirasa Nagar Cly, Hyd.

61.A.V.M. Raju, S/o. A.V.N. Raju, aged about r13 Ie-aisl0ccSoni^rarE Engineer, Ri/o. Flat No. A-101, Sri Sai Datta Apartments, East Srinivasa Nagar Colony, Hydrabad.

62.Uppalapati Siva Rama Raju, S/o. Late U.V. Rama Raju, aged about 73 years, Occ Retd. Engineer, Ri./o. Flat No. A-101, Sri Sai Datta Apartments, East Srinivasa Nagar Colony, Hydrabad.

63.lnampuri Gowri, W/o l. Rama Krishna, aged about 60 years, OcC Housewife, R/o. 6-3629/4, Flat No.402, Purushotham Enclave, Anandnagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

64.Aisha Khatoon, Wo. Ahmed Abdul Haleem, Aged about49yearc, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No.5-3-86'1, Mozamzahi Market, Desi Hospital, Hyd.

65. Sheela Madhusudhan, S/o. Shankara Rao, aged about 46 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Flat No. t 02, Sreenivasa Apartments, Vanastralipuram, Mansurabad Road. lndiranagar, Hyderabad.

66.N. Prasanna, W/o. M. Amarender, aged about zt3 years, Occ Housewife, R/o.4€-135, Sreekashiram Nivas, Gowliguda, Ram Mandir, Hyd -12. 6T.Ungarala V.V.N. Krishna Rao, S/o.Late U.P.Swamy, aged about 52 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Flat No.101 , S.V. Raja Heaven Dattatrela Nagar, Asifnagar, Hyderabad. 6S.Yarlagadda Seethamahalaxmi, Wo. Y. Krishna Rao, aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife. R/o 6-1 -1 3219, Flat No.202lA, Panchavathl Apartments, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad - 500061.

69.ChoMavaram Jhansi Rani, Wo.M.S.T.Ram Reddy, aged about 33 years, Occ Housewife. R/o 17-1-391/7/8, Saraswathinagar, Saidabad, Hyd.

70. Derugula Eedaiah, S/o D Sanjaya, aged about 62.years, Occ Business, R/o. C/o. D. Narasimha, Opp Shilpa Apartrnents,Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District. 71 . Mannem Manorama. W/o M. Krishna Mohan Reddy aged about 60 years, Occ Employee. R/o. Flat No.401, Swapnika Heavcns Apartments, Opp Alphonsas High School, Kalyan Nagar, Phase-|, H$erabad - 38. T2.Tunuguntla Tara Sesha Kumari, W/o. Late T. Upendra Gupta, aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. Plot No.101, Central Part-ll Apartments, Dharam Karam Road, Balkampet, Hyderabad - 16.

73. Battina Jaya Gopi, W/o. B. Kameswara Rao, aged about62 years, Occ Housewifrj, R/o. Plot No.80, Flat No.301, Laxminagar Colony, Hyd. T4.Yalamanchili Sri Kumari, W/o.Y.Bagiradha, aged about 58 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. ALPHA-710, Hl-Tech City Road, Jayabheri Sllicon County, Kondapur. Hyderabad. 190

75.Alluri, Srilatha, Wo. A.S.M. kju' aged about 43 years, Occ - Housewife, .R/o. Flal No.A. 1q1, Sli Sai Datta ApartMents, East Srinivas Nagar Colony, Hyderabad.

76.A.V.M. Raju, S/o. A.V.N. Raju, aged about 43 years, Occ Software Engineer, R/ o. A-10i, Sri Sai Datta Apqrtments, East Srinivasa Nagar Colony, Hyderabrad. TT.tJppalapati Siva Rama Raju, S/o.Late U.V. Rama Raju, aged abo_ut 73 Ocb Retd.Engineer, R/o. Flat No.101, SriSai Dafta Apartments, East Srinivasrt Nagar @[gny, Hyderabad. years, TS.lnampudi Gowri, Wo. l. Rama KrishnE about 6Q yeap, Occ Housewile, R/o. 6-3-6291,+, Flat No.402, Purushotham Enclave, Anand nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad; -'-, --

79.Aisha Klratoon, Wo. Ahrned Abdul Haleem. Aged about 49 years, Occ Housewife, R/o, H.No.5-3-861, Mozamzahi Market, Desi Hospital, Hyd.

80.Sheela trladhusudhan, S/o. Shankara Rao, aged a.bout 46 yea Business, R/o.Flat No.102, Sreenivasa Apartments, Vanasthal Mansurarbad Road, lhdiranagar, Hyderabad. rs, Occ ipuram,

81.N. Prasarnna, Wo. M. Amarender, aged about 43 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. 4-8-135, Sreekashir:am Nivas, Gowliguda, Ram Mandir, Hyd'12.

32.Ungarakl V.V.N. Kriqhna Rao, S/o. Late U.P. Swamv, aged about 52 years, Occ Bus,iness, R/o. Flat No.1.01. S.V. Raja Heaven Daftatreya Nagar, Asifnagerr, Hyderabad.

33.Yarlagadda Seethamahalaxmi, Wo. Y. Krishna Rao, aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. 6-1 -1 3219, FlatNo. 202lA, Panchavathi Apartments, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad - 500061. S4.Chowdavaram Jhansi Rani, -Wo. M.S.T. Ram Reddy Occ HotJSewtfe oR/o. 1 7-1 -391 17 I 8. Sa ra swathi naga r, 59. ,aged about 33 years, Saidabad, Hyderabad -

85. Derugula Eedaiah, S/o. D. Sanjaya, aged about 62 yea.r9, Occ Business, Rl/o. C/o. D. l{arasimha, Opp ShilpaApartments, Kondapur Village, Seriling;lmpally Mandal, R.R. District.

86.T. Leela Prasad, S/o. T.V. Anjaneyulu, aged about 31 years, Occ Software Engineerr, R/o.57€-7, Old Post Office Street, Patamata, Vij.

87. Nukala Radhika,Reddy, WO. N. Sreedhar Reddy. aged about 57 years, Occ Busines,s, R/o. Plot No.33, Sree Nilayam Apts, Domalaguda,

88. Raoot S;arala, Wo. Krishna Narayana Root, aged about 69 years, Occ Retd. Employ,ee, R/o. 17-1-3831104 A, Vinaya-Nagar, Saidabad, Hyd. 8g.Sunkara Harshita, D/o.. Prameela, aged about 28 years, Occ Student, Rl/o. Plot No,20/A, B Block, Sri Krishna Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad.

90. Shankar, S/o. Harichander, aged about 56 years, Occ Govt. Service, R/o. SRT 1020, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. 91 . KondaF,aneni Nagaraju Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K Krishna Rao, aged about 54 years, Occ Employee, R/o. E 1812,Lab Qtrs, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad - 500 0s8. . rj : : . : = I 1.,.:1i ?'f .liii:rff.,i#Ersy.ssr:55i.,i |+..;;ii.: :. :i 1r tl 191 ,'SST"!,"1',ffi l[%t'rsJ3i"];n]i=rIi'ff€:#it^ff Hyderabhd - 500 034. if :fd'fl"Effi ""v e3:.lasti.N"ry$q.8fl lI;E=%i#.3ffii,ffi --'G:i;Venkata Krishna Estates, Sumitra Nagar' nuri e4.\aza.Jaya Pqakash, $/o-K, Leeladhara Rao' ased "-'Effio-y?{ nyo Ftat'No.s, Jain Adarsh, Jain Housinl g5.Chalicham Nageswara Rao, s{o. GH Seshaiah,-aged about64 years, occ Retd . em p nye'e] Ry; . ?br, ti,t;it; t iim i Towers,' La:wye rpet, O ngo I e. "1Tri8ilfo?fir,m*Xt:'J.*'R/o ft3L'"'r[3faSff., *ro. , so[pf?z"i:!ff Hyderabad - S0oosz' E;"i#;583,T3'ik,?ff $ffiT'i,fi +ffi t"ffi"rlElPi",#:fu ',, aaarrahar,* s2vea eTK,[il2/3[m"Sf#;,H::f !?in:fl eHi::rt#SE'.ffi r.:fr 9['"" Kuqar, ag-e{jpoyt Sl^years' Occ gB.Marella Rajani Kumari, Emotovee, nyo. d;; it'5y;ffi $rii;inio,E- i7ts, Lab citrs, Kanchanbagh, nyderSoao - 5oo 058- -S/o.Vijaya , FUo. nn[ts'ig:#f1I{f":ni:u'-?'?}Eif a[x[:ffi :.?:33'1i#H:f '-I?:"'occ 100. Gullapalli lndu Madhavi, W/o' G' RFrq qgqd about'39 vears' Occ Housewife, Fi;: i;i6ii'r".tivA, ;i-"i r.io.G{5l1nskruti Palace, MLA colonv' Ho"O f.fo.r'z,Eaniira Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034' l0lanirmaraf fi ,i*gls;i;fl 3ilf, ,31$Xh,?,#"1,ris,:SlsSno""Business' Occ Leela i}z. Chenna tJma Rani, W/o. Q,N'-K""ava Chand aged '"-'Eipio;;;, Rv; rtat l'to'205, sai Ram siri about 49 Sampada 'i-t-bgiz7, years, Apts, ttigar, BegumPet, HYderabad'

103. K Surya Rao, S/o. Latg Kgyy?I Venkata Subba B?o'ag*.about S4-years' Occ Emptoyee, R/o. t 6-1 1 -51 1tDtii,St llivaf,ina Nadar] Dilsukhnagar' Hvd T',f 8"$,i33HLl ] J;,ilL r, 1 0 4. _ G u il a pa il i_S a tva n araya n a, s/o. venkata s ubba" Occ Retd. E*piov""' fUo' 6-1-69t2, Flat No'202' 'C Hyderabad-500004' 1 0 5 ^c ' " " oo"" E*prov#,' nvo. piiit No' 1 7, 36-1 36/28' Defen h a ga rl am ud i Krish na, 9{o' c- Mad husudhan f *;"'E3,d"fi?l Secunderabad. B:f* ff,;[: Cuii. S.R. ruagar, HYderabad' 'ouuy,*isB.l?'sl?:El,s#"?lHbifc'*?fl,St'':1ffi ;?:U?3":3'i:"#k 107. Kasulavada Latha, W/o G'-(fsh!a B?o,-?ged about 39 vears' Occ Housewife, R/o- fi-2-28gt1zofs,'Filt'G-'bO[-fa*mi Teja Homes' P S Nagar' VUiyanagar ColonY, HYderabad'

108. Palakotanu Naravana Reddv, ,s/o' P V Subba F".*1h#ff"3,?""Ht#m:Xi '"* o;;Ad;cultu;;l njo-- tt ttto -s-b'-zz, Flat No'42' Mat Nagar, HYderabad- t92 AI.ID

1. 2 4 District. 3. e"id" , Sukkaiah, S/o' ggOq Maisaiah' "'Ageo about 53 years' Occ Aoriculturre, nlo.'t+No.1-29, G;hib&ii virra6e, Serilingampaily Mandal', iiZn6ireddyDistrict, ramet Balaiah' Aged about 78 years' 9C9 [:ft ffimi,:,:Hif 'il'*|il a ff il til, o;*ii v i ri u g J :t *i, i;;; ;; t'i6 nal CilA ibdov oistrict' (Died ) ViffiG,"$ffiimoally Mandal' R'R' Dist' Viiffi;,'d&iinlampatv Mandal' R'R' Dist

5. Gadda $ankari S/o"Maisaiah.' gq"Aglpulture R/o' H No'1-38/1' Gachibowli u'

6.Gaddal(ishna,S/o.Mals.aiah,ptc3griculture.R/o.H.No.1-38/l,Gachibowli \,,' , 1a6..^. ^- "'r

7. Syed Krreem, S/9. K[rqi1Ory-4 Seriling,amp"tiy"tvr"ind;dRt"g"ReddvDistrict toriculture' i-Vo Gachibowli Village' u' 8.Md.Gh'ouse,S/o'latg${lsmail'O99{grlcultur-e'R/o'GachibowliVillage' 5lttflilii""iiiiri-v nainoat, Ransa Reddv District 9. Md. Yorusuf, 8/o. !ate.Md. lsmail'-oqq Agfgultyre' R'ro GachibowliVillage' "' SJtfli"Iliriiauy Miooal, Ranga Reddv District' Occ Agriculture' Fl/o. Gachibowli Village' 10. Md. Wezir, S/o, Reddy District SeritingamPally late Khasim Ali, Mandal, Ranga 11 . Md. Wazeer, S/o: late Khasim Ali' Occ ' ''5J,uiniEiipa[, Mandal, Ransa ReddY Agriculture, R/o. Gachibowli Village, District

12. M anikcind a Yadaiah' S/o'- $,t9 A;ri;uliurc, R/o. H.No'1 -67 I 1' LRI n,ingdreddY 147 to 151) lvlan ikonda Kondaiah, Aged bowli, SerilingamaPllY Gacni 52 ,R years, R. Dist Occ .1Did per

13. D. Gandaiah H.No.1 -5611, . S/o. late DaraPalli Babaiah ' CacniOowti Viliage. Seriling . Aced 62 Years, Occ Agrl' Rl/o' am-aplly, R.R.Dist. 193 to'Sa?,Siifi[f,i'd'lxEf',Hhu""313[i,98"*flt1.'u*ure' R/o' GachibordiMrrase' 'u'3ff iig'"9,J3;i0"r:i5"t'RXffi :Rtr4,'3i"1|ltr'R/o'GachibowriMrrase' 16.Smt. Santamma, Wo. late Balaiah' Occ^Agriculture' R/o' Gachibowli Mllage' ' "' Sliiiiiifiil;iiii-i,tanoat, Ransa Reddv District' 't 7. Gadda Yettaia h, t" I FUo' G achibowri i$:fi oYffi iu?T.ifl5"'i.lltft . Village, SeriliRgamPallY

18.Gadda{ars-ipha,",q,nfi Village, SerilingamPallY ,'r :fl 3"f [""TS3'Ahff "rt',LSirturqFr/o'Gachibowri Fr/o' GachibowriVirrase' g$;p"Affih,fliflBjlE"Yr#E[,i8"*,fltJil'*ure' ccHousewire' *B[li.u,i,"'xyolgX3;.,Hfl ,,?viB8If,lrl*?1fir'?'ui:3h:ffif "fi :o?"1f-l?lb'J&,3#i3ti:UlE!l,,l[3Hl#,'1",fi f;o?ttfl lB'i:\l'o" ?rfi ,i.l!"ila?,,,",r3*1?iff np&i,*Jil":&L?ii,r?fi it?fi:'JH[:o" *fi :,iji'ifjg"Ti.,Bf*P"fi l38l3!fP,B',f,Hii'^1"[%T'oecAorcurR/o 'of ulJl!?il'""iSr'3;,i,iti,fJ;33*'i"'rtl33"l,"n}i?,""#ff Xll'**"' ,uR[1,-odl]X3:'$;:X',hft[il''S1'*'.iff ',?'r'.1iil,?,lf; a8Rllousewire' ,u f ,fj?,i?Y?iflf, .3,,fftiill3;33$,:B:#;'y"'fi :";rt"SH5unure " iT,l;9:fo1l33;no,l?*t #,lH!!:stH,eil'r:'-"rT'''r:^HiB':f&B?Ji:"*ire' * gfl,P,Jfi:'Jgt*?fi3 *tsff ful??i3l Ri& T,l?lrture Rr/o fi,,S5fli Ri/o FUo H No' 1 - 'nfi ,[1Y3ff '31?nfr"[I'i]i13bf S:,.ii""n"ffi ,'fr"ilfus""i'i:[gt',:"" 'n?":'-??:atl'".3"$i"'Ifl r;ft"j.f; l3:}"'rt"ffi 'J:#rAo{curtureR/o 'o'fi 31.Spl. Gr. Dy. Collector & RDO' Rajendranagar Division' - " ill Jl;i,t3ii5!,tg',: il:;",:'i#,ffi'1fl:$'3'I3flf' occ House wire'

33.V.RaiendraPrasad,S/o.Satyanarayana,Aged53years'occBusinessFl/o' 1 19, sRT' Sanathnagar' Hyoeraoao'

34.V.PrabhakarReddy,S/o.V.D.Rama.Reddy,,Agedabout50years,occ Business' R/o. B-3-s 1 ;i5A' ilfilii;i N;s;;' ?buiurg uda' Hvderabad' 194 *[#?"il"X:tr]T#H[TI;S?A,I;;,iiliXil*gBXf:fi ]l3gffir'occRtd 36.Mr. B. Jhansi Lakshmi, S/o. V3"., Devq.Rao, {g"4 qbou.[ 5! yeqp'.Occ -i;;com ""' Ed;6G;; R6:F6[ iib:i7s, 37.m/Sl(astopaCorporation,Rep'9yitsrylgl"-gllg.Director'D'SriAnilKumarR Kamdar, nr. s}:87,?5p'ni-.i1, (ama Hotet-stition Raod, Nampally' Hyder:abad. Nagai, dachibowli, R. R- Dist-

38. The Joint Ootlecto r-1, Ran gared dy District' (Respond*': : :":ilTls;H::#ff ; :lx Il'*, ou petition under Section 1Sl of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vauate the order dt.07.o7.2017 passed in cRP MP No'4168 of 2017 in the above CRF. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI' D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos'{ to 111 : SRI C' SUMON Counsel forttre Respondent Nos.l21,123,128 to 134 : SRI SURABH RAJ VERMA Counsel for ttre Resilondent No'53 : SRI A H CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel forthe Respondent No'145 : MS' E ANISHA REDDY 195 WRIT PEITIION NO:38fl) OF ?008 *;--Rl#BFlffi]lR*ffiJafj?ihY;ls-sf Betlrveen: Gachibowli Mllage *,""ri8f t's']ry:5,I,?',',i;13?: : Private service' Fi/o'l-{ 'No' - - ill'"a 'fl{ffi $,fi #s,}"',13'[a'83:{"5Sfl l^ir?trl#fu xr"*l**fl'fi District, Owner of Plot No'224-A' survey r\o c I ' ...petitioners AND 1 The State of A.P. rep. by Prl' Secretary to Government' Revenue Department' Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabao' ,Ilii"E5j[t5#EaY,IJ*1iSl?i?,H,'3"?:J3',UiEt"iJl"'#l'ff il"*0"0.

3. The Special fficer and Competent Authority' Urban Land Ceiling' Hyderabad" 4. The Mce Chairman, Cyberabad Development AuthoriW (Hyderabad Urban *' odi"ii,i'riiii Aiitt dtilJ;i i:5le' Fi i g ah p a ta ce' secu nd e rabad -3' ReddY District.

5. The Cotlectorand District Magistrate' Ranga Reddy District' 6. The Revenue DMslonal Officer' Chevella Division' 7. The Tahsildr, (Mandal Revenue officer) serilingampally Mandal, Ranga B. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation' Hyderabad' 9. The Commissioner of Police' Cyberabad' at Lakdikapool' Hyderabad' 1o.lvl/s. NCC Urban Infrastructure Ltd., rep, by its, Director A.G.K. Raiu S/o. ' " Xi:i:-ilil o/,;: ai' ffisfi;;; tiirii' punii g u tta' Hvderabad' 11.M/s. NCC Urban lnl 11"" EiJ::?illxs?Hff '=#""yfu!,:,'nrili:,f[,{fls:I€'".?i"11[Tfr ResidencY, SriPuram 'rg'/i,f""xRf KT#""#"'.ft #'F'3lrtl8!1iT.'#,b:i.iHf ',#,5:8,T,'5fi Coid, NamPattY, HYderabad'

13. Gadda Balaiah' S/o.Gadd 'ColonY, S/o.Pictri ReddY, a Mvsaiah Rep. by their G P A P'Venugopal Reddy ;r1i iE ;;;r.' 6ci'Business, N o'2'18t 41 t7 t A' ,.F3:rtSJllElst[,31?.G;i1?y#3"i,x8",8#'3?[3;!#;3;Y'i[lE:f'? I 4117lA, ourgdoai Deshmukh ColonY' *0"' 196 |r^' "Bfl5ifil*1.#k".9;#i:#niai:,3:BJ8ll"'';5;t;&Y3:t8ir'fi 16.Gadda Krishna, S/o.Gadda Mysaiah Rep' by their G'P'A' P'Venugopal Reddy 6cc'eusiness' No'2-181 41 fl I A' S/o. Pichi Reddv, ageo "#'[Zdl"Jo' DurgaOai Deshmukh ColonY' "ffi iitfl 1}l.Jr:'gYr,i,1iXl,?;,3131fl ""o ls.Kharimarnet Shivaiah,. S/o.Balaiah Rep. by their.G'P'A' P'Venugopal Reddy S/o.Picti Reddv, aseo ;ffi ;i'iA t;il: b6 Business' N o'2-1 8t 41 t7 t A' Ourgaba' Deshhukh ColonY' t?I.t;!Xiir-i8fl ,nBf g,[f, '.fJXa; j""r'J."9#,?iIi3;,3Y3"?t?5#;3;H?li9?EX,FA1v Durgabai Deshinukh ColonY'

20.Mohd.Ghouse,S/o.lateMohd.lsmailRep.bytheirG.P.A.P.Venugopal Reddv S /o.pichi n"ooy, ibli' iii"rI +a-vEad, occ Business, N o.2-1 81 41 t7 t A, ijurgdba,i Deshmukh ColonY'

21.Mohd.Yousuf,S/o.lateMohd'lsmailRep'by-theirG'P'A'P'VenugopalRedcly S/o.Picl^i Reddv, aseo ;i;ili4iiffits' 6cc'eusiness ' No'2-18I4117tA' Durgabai Deshmukh ColonY,

22.Mohd. Wazir, S/o.late.Mohd' lsmail Rep' bytheir G'P'A' P'Venugopal Reddy S/o.Pichi neoov, ageo;6oii 4s H;'-od Business' No'2-181411714' Durgabai Deshmukh ColonY'

23.AhmedWazeer,S/o.lateKhasimAliRep'by-theirG'P'A'P'Venug S/o. Piclri Reddv, agec! auttil +'a yeirs' bciBusiness' N o'2-1 81 41 Durgabai Deshinukh ColonY' opal ReddY t7lA.

24. Manikonda Yadaiah, S/o'late Kondaiah Rep' --'iil;;SdPichi Reddv, aged about 48 vears bvtheirG.P.A. P.Venug , bcc Business, R/o.2-1 8l4117lA,

25. Darlapirlli Gandaiah, S/o.late Babaiah Rep' by their G'P'A' P'Venugopal Ourgitai Deshmukh ColonY' Reddv S/o. Pichi neoov,'l6ll-a6oij'4s t&rs; occ Business' Fjo'2-1 81 41 t 7 t A' Ourgdoai Deshmukh ColonY' *RABtf Deshnrukh ColonY' 1#Sl;:hit',.i1:[:B"i,J*il"tlAi&Y?3,11?9il5'Sln'"il?''"n' 'f,'&%1"1P.4'i!ff l.3lB,"l1$l;hl":Y:ltlf o,,if Blo,Ug:i'.n' 'R:8fr f Deshnrukh ColonY' *R:etlru;HyJs,?x'sfJ"t:'ogl1,'Jl"3;!;t5y?tyf il'?fs:lJ"i'u:''"n' Deshrnukh ColonY'

29.Gadd;lYEttaiah,S/o.GaddaVeeraiahRep.bytheirG.P.A.P.Venugopal Reddv S/o.Pichl n.oov]lild i6btii'id vd'io' Occ Business' Wo'2-18t4'tt7tA' Durgirbai Deshmukh ColonY' r97 3o.Gadda Pichi S/o.Gadda Laxmaiah ReP. bY their G.P'A' about 48 Years, Occ Business' P No.2- 1ru4, Oeshmukh S/o.

31. Durgabai Colony .A. P.Venugopal ReddY No.2-181411714,

32.P.

33. Reddy ,Silo. h Cotony, Bag Pichi Reddy Business No.2-181 41 17 lA, Durgabai Amberpet, HYderabad. .late K.Bachi ReddY Amberpet, HYd Business N o.2-2-251P I 5' Durgabai erabad.

34.V.Rama Krishna, S/o'V.Sivaji FUo'H'No'2-6-2' Nakkalagutta Hanumakonda' Warangal District.

35. Lakshmi, Wo.V.Sivaji Housewife R/o'H.No'26-2' a, Waranga I District.

36. Smt.Talluri Swamalatha, ry/-o'I y !3g.H.ousewife Ramnagar Pattancheruw MedaK ulstnct' Rlo' H' No' 1 4/79' Sree

37. K.Sudheer Kumar, S/o.K.Amarsundar Service Ri/o 304' Gandi Residency "' iii7c.-ri;.['2'5] ip. i'tigrr' Yellaredd ig ud a' Hvd e ra bad' * 38. K.SuIesh Kumar, S/o.K.Amarsundqr Service Fyo 39.K.Amarsundar, S/o.K.Basavaiah Retd. Service R/o H No 34/A Journalists iiiTc:ffi .b2;,'i'iJ.Nisai' Yellareddisuda' Hvderabad 304' Gandi Residency . Colony, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

40.v. . S/o.Veera Gaghavaiah Retd Employee Ri/o' Gtur Vuyyut Mandal, Krishna District' Via Eil;d-84-e5rA/4, Srinasar colonv' Hvd eraba d'

41. Smt.P.Saritha' Wo.Uma Shankar Housewife.R/o 505' Krishna Divyashthi -'' 42. Smt.Rita V. Shah, Wo.Vrjay O' Shah Housewife Rlo H No l T' Jeera' Secunderabad.

43.Smt.Rita V.Shah, Wo.Vijay O' Shah Housewife R/o H No 17' Jeera' Secunderabad. .. X$rr$lS[?]a?/o.late o'c'Shah Business Rr/o H No 17' Jeera' aS- Kakada Venkata Ranga Rao, S/oXoteswara Rao' Business Ryo Ramapuram '- i{l['tlairOivaoa Mandal Krishna District' 46.Bheema Sankaram Rayudu' S/o'late Nagabushanam Ray-udu Service -"' Hiflii :iioldti,i, 6;iili|;fi'arift nts, owa ia t< a p u ri c o lo n v' P a n jas utta' Hyderabad.

47.V.Surva Pral<ash, S/o.V.Venkataramaiah Business R/o H No 710' Naveen Nagai Hyde-tat-aa. *3("4ffJ:A::'lHi3,I*;'A9;[",|-3Y,b',:'{ff l3:,'9:#3fl i3}ff3"[i0"" 49. Smt.Geeta Gupta, Wo.Ashok Gupta Housewife Rl/o'H No'10o' Jyothi Colony' SEcunderabad. 198

50.Srflt.lGkar{a R/o.RamaPuram Post, Wo.Siva Lakshman Rao Housewfie, inaiviOa Mandal l(ishna District.

51.K.Anil Reddy, S/o.K.L.ReddyBusinessR/o'Ft'No^2$MLA'Colony' Road No'12 -' -Banjarzr Hill6, Hyderabad' Mehdipatnam, HYderabad' MendiPatnam, HYderabad' Liegance, AmeerPet, HYderabad'

52.K.L.Re<tdy,S/o.K.Narasimha.ReddyRetd'SeMceNo'7'1'222'Apurupa --' 53. K. Sreed har Reddy' s/o. K'N' Reddy Busines s N o'1 2-2'7 15t'l' tl$01 - -' 54. K.Shaslridhar Reddy, s/o.K' N'Reddy Business N o'12-2-7 151 1' ffi01 - . 55. K.Murlklhar Reddy, s/o.K.N'Reddy Business No12'2-7 1511' ffi01 - -' 56. K.Vimala Reddy' w/o.K.Narsimha Reddy Housewife ' No'12-2-71511 ' ffiol 57.V.Aiay lleddy, S/o.K.P.Rao Business R/o'H'No'2Ol' Road No'21 Banjara Hills' MehdiPatnam, HYderabad' MehdiPatnam, HYderabad' HYderailad.

58. K.P.Rao, S/o.Jeswant Rao Business Wo'H'No'201' Road No'2' Banjara Hills' Hyderabad

59. K.Anianeyulu, S/o.K.Lakshminarayana B-u-siness Fi/o'H'No'640/1' "- ij;;iffi ,b'ash, Satoornagat, Hydeiabad60' 60. M. Hariprasad, S/o. M.Venatasubbaiah Business R/9'A-32;' Madhuranagar' Hyderabad. $-. . .+':r' ii,' ' ij+.i' i.je-

61. K.Ramersh Babu, S/o.K. Sa ngeet Nagar, 6-3-661 Accountant FYo.Plot No.78'

62.Kum.D.\iveditha, D/o.D.V.Rao Ri/o'Plot No'29' Road No'13' Banjara Hills' Hyderabad.

63. K. Madhukar, S/o.K.V. Ramaiah Business R/o'NG-1' Lavakusa Residency' "" ii;;; Nr r, banlara Hills. HYderabad' 64.Penmetsa Ramakrishna Raiu, S/o P'Narasi.mhg Raju R/o'Pfot No'34' Rao and "- h;ii;'6;i;;v, i""o tr" z, eSniara Hills, Hvderabad' 65.Smr.Petldi Lalitha, W/o.P.Ramesh Business R/o'Rajendra Colony' Barkatpur' Hyderatrad. 66 peddi Abhinva, s/o.P.Ramesh Education Fi/o.Rajendra colony, Barkatpur, Hyderatrad. Coiony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad'

67. Smt.Perrmetsa Pramila, W/o'P'R'K'Raiu Housewife R/o'Plot No'34' Rao and "' HJii;'cliiji-tv noaJuo z' Baniara Hills,-Hvderabad' 68. Smt.Gu,lavalli Suguna' W/o.G.Ramesh Housewife F/o'B-78' Jounalist -- 69. Smt.Nallapa Raiu Revathi, W/o'N'Vamsee Chakravarthi Housewife Ri/o'Flat "" il;.Biii. dr;oJ hesioenCli, Srinasar Colonv, Hvderabad-73' ToChaooicliChandrasekhar,s/o.Ch.HanumanthaRaoBusinessRl/o.A-37,Road ' - t lo.Z,'f itmnagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad' 199 71 74119, Vamini, Rama Apartments, Wo.S.Mkram Raju Housewife FUo.H.No.50-1 21-

72.K.Rambabu, S/o.K. ' I1ffinn LakeMlla T3.KonoantiVinavkumar,S/o.K.MadhukarEducationF/o'NG-1'Lavakusa '-'iieCio6ncv, Begumpet, Hyderabad. Rciad No.2, Banjara Hills, Hvderabad' SeMce R/o.Flat No.z02, RJo H.No.6-3- T4.Smt.Konoanti Haritha, D/o.K.Madhukar Education R/o'NG-1, Lavakusa ' 'eds-iOenc!, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad'

75. Peddi Ramesh, S/o.P.Linga Murthy Profession R/o'Rajendra Colony' Barkatpura, HYderabad.

76.P.Sri Krishna, S/o.P.Ramesh, Education R/o.Rajendra colony, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. TT.C.Hanumantha Rao, S/o.Adaiah Business Ryo'A-37, Road No'2, Film Nagar Jubilee Hills, HYderabad.

78.Smt.C.Lalitha, Wo.C.Hanumantha Rao Housewife, R/o'A-37' Road No'2' Film Nagar Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

79.Smt.B Mala Wo.late G.Kasaiah Housewife R/o.Gaddiannaram, *' 80.Smt.Veeramachineni Jayalaxmi, W/g.latg V.Seshagiri Rao Housewife, R/o. F[t t6.ioi';Anii;G €'s'oenii, Matresrrnasar Coilonv, ECIL' Hvderabad' 81.Smt.M.Saroiini, Wo.M.Subbaiah Housewife Rl/o.H'No'37-1-2106(4) 2nd lane' Bhagyanagar, Ongole 523 001. * S2.Smt.A.Satyavathi, Wo.A.R.Srinivas and Dio' Medarametla Subbaiah ilil;ilid Ry;.Ftit tto. t og, Annapuma Mansion, H'No' 1 0-2-289/36' Shantinagar, HYderabad-28.

83. Medarmefla Subbaiah, s/o.Venkaiah Business R/o.37-1 -406(4), 2nd line Bhagyanagar, Ongole 523 001 .

84. Medarameila chandra Mohan, S/o.Subbaiah Business R/o.37-1 -406(4), 2nd line Bhagyanagar, Ongole 523 001.

85.A'R.Choudary,S/o.PitchaiahRetiredBankofficer,R/o.H.No.10-2.289/36' Shantinagar, HYderabad-28.

86.Smt.A.Javalakshmi,Wo.A.R.ChudaryHousewife'R/o.H.No.10-2.289/36' Shantinagar, HYderabad-28. ST.Smt.PenmetsaPrameela,Wo.P.R.K.RajuHousewifeRl/o.PlotNo.34,Rao - inO nii, Cobny, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad' gg.smt.lndukuri savitramma, wo.late I Surpa Raju Housewife R/o.Plot No.34, --'il;';d R;iu cotonv, Road No.2' Banjaia Hills, Hvderabad' Eg.Smt.Bhupathi Raju Subhdra, W/o.late Bhupathi Verkata Rama Raju '-'6;;-.i*ii;iro.Piot l\|o.3-a, Rao and Raju Colonv, Road No'2' Banjara Hills' Hyderabad. g0.Nallaoa Raiu Vamsee chakravarthi, sfo,N.Prabhakar Ralu Business Fi/o.Flat - -' il6.'56i, cf, nsi Re.iaency, Srinaga r Colonv, Hvd erabad -73' 204 s{.lndukur! Dhana Raju, Slq'!'Q't'l'BajY' Buoiness R/o'Flat Na'102' S'V' Towers' Aruna S'ociety, K.P.H'B' Hyderaoao' ' ' t{ciusewif4 R/o.Flat No.102' S.V'

92.lndukuri Geeta Vani, W/o.l.DhEina Towers, Aruna SocietY, K.P.H.B. e3. yenikapati Ram Manohar, s/olftS:fiFt[1""8-t?ness R/o.Plot No.A-37, Road N'c.2' Filmnagar, *X3:JATT;;;:'#H:i:Xf :X:.?:^?$'f:Eyi3e"J..3e*'Em:fi ffi ffi i""Y"''"' *ie,:,J:l,tfj.,\"Ul?;tY,T"i,[1[3ffi Rao 96.Chava t(rishna Rao, S/o.lat'e Dai-alathq Ramaiah Business FUo'FIat No'306' *' R/o.Plot No.258, Siii i,t'Lii orirters, ilvaersuda, Hvderabad 97-Bodla Ramchandram, S/o'B.Mallaiah.Business R/o'Main Road' Peddapalli

98.Bodla lVlallikariun, S/o.B.Ramchandram. Business R/o'Main Road' Peddapalli ""' ViiE;" ;A rvrinoit' Karimnasar District' 99. Peddi tvluneender, S/o.late Venkanna Busihess R/o'ltshok Nagar' --' Housewife, Fl/o.Kachiguda' kitirnnugrr. Karimnagar District' 100. S,mt.Peddi Rukmini, Wo'P' Hyderabad. {nl ' -'R/o.Gacldiannaram, Malakpet, Hyderabad' 1O2. The Chief S Hyderabad, Telangana S,mt.GundaBhagyamma,W/o-tgte.GKgsaihhHousewife' , State of Telangana' Telarrgana Secretariat'

103. Ri 1nd T he Director General of Police, State ' "hoo n,irinJiiei.r;r"thi, Ambedkar colony' Tel'anqa na - 500 004. and Stamps, Herza E 095. State state, , Lakd ikapul Road, bad, , Hydera 'o'"'n'"I[i'3&":""'f":lTifi fll'n?ifr'ri:{:Bli"#'i':liffitt]fl a?t -n6jJ. lrvJ"iuuad. Tetangana 500 034' ana, Nagar, 1 r,

107. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ptz',t. O d Mumbai Highwav Next to Care Teleco nr Nagar Extenslon, Gachibowli, Commissionerate, 2-48, Sri ShYam Nagar' , Telangana - 500 032 Commissionerate, 2-48, Sri ShYam Nagar, , Telangana 500 032. 1o8. The Station House Officer, Gaqfr-lb1x{i Police Station' COR3 VWJ' llT '""jrn"tio,i,'bIit'ioowri noio' ii"iitie 'lr'ttoe' Gachibowli' Hyderabad' Telangana 500 032. irj: . i 'ir'.\ : ' '+in:i, hv, ri$i, F{r. 1o9. The District Nagar, Prashanth 500 072. 0. The Joint S Nagar, Prashanth 500 072. 11 Nagar, IDA

111. The Joint Nagar, P 500 072. rashanth Nagar, I DA 201 r),

112. The Joint Sub-Registrar( 6), Ra Prashanth Nagar, IDA 072. Prashant Nagar, Telangana - 500 FCHG 85P, Prashant Hyderabad, Tclangana District, FCHG 85P, Prashant , Telangana Reddv District, FCHG8SP, Prashant Kukafpally, Hyderabad, Telangana - FCHG 8SP, Hyderabad *' Zone, F89H 8MH, - 500 046. "1;-,Jf Sf33#^i,Y'il'l1lik3;Iil',iifi 3'JI3tl;?-'3f, fa'll:t#t%f

114. HCU F?'i I 'l 15. The Commissioner, Hyderabad Disaster Response and Asset Protection AgencY (HYDRA). ll6.PhoenixTechnoHubPvt.Ltd.,NowGlob..allTHubPvt.LLd.!403P'TS ' '"No. r, bi;;i-'F:rlv-ito g, noao No.28, Jubilee Hills, Hvderabad' Telangana 500 033. Respondent Nos. 102 to 1 16 are impleaded as per G'O'dt' 24'12'2024 in lA No. 3 of 2024. ...ResPondents Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed thererrvith, the High court may be pr""a"Ji" i."ue a writ or order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) to declare the exemption order issued by the State co,",n*"ntinG.o.Ms.Nos.1816,dt.18.10.20052183'dt.27.12.2oo5eic., tr""o*r"rO"O by Special Officer and Competent Authority' UrQn !a1! Ceiling' ';tJ;;;;;d ;proved buildins Plans of Chairman HUDA (CoA)' Hvderabad -Vice L.N..tioe2BptcoNzdoo, ot. ts.s.zoo7 and the plan sanction approved for ,riti .toog" comptex vtde proceedings G/353/Bp/261112OO7, dt. 19.5.2007 of "it" iiuprty ffrfr-ni"ipat bommissioner, Serili-ngampally, Greater Hyderabad_Municipal Coipoirtion as illegal ii) to set aside the-same as urged bythe Joint Collector-l' i"rlg; i"dot oist..Lt vide Lr.No.AOM/264n5, dt.20.1O.2OO7 as the respondents 12 to 33 have no right to tlnsfer any inch of land in Sy'No-s'.35' 36' 37.' 40' 42' qi, aq, qA, az and s3 part of Gachi6owli village in view of the surrender of the tenancy claim in proceedings of the Tahsildai in-proceedings No'A3/10-805/64' dated 18.2.196s A3/374e,65: dated 2.4.1965 A4/256/1966, dated 16.10.1966 and n""f li"t was also pubtisheJ stating that NIL tenancy and its confrrmation through oa"o or Revenue oivisionai offiJer in LRw47/75, dt. 3'.t.5.1975 and in view of th;-;rd"* of Honble Srpt"*u Court in Civil Appeal Nos'.6093/2006 and Tol3t2oo6andthestatusquoordersdt.3.9.2006grantedbytheHonbleSupreme to direct the respondents 10 and 11 to stop all illegal blrrt-rno construction over the biiirrLa land and declare the fraudulent GPA of "on.equentiattyiilf 202 respondents 13 to 31 in farrour of P'Venugopat Reddy the sale deeds bearing doc.Nos.2887'/2o03, to 29OOX2OO3I executbd qn 10-3,2003 and sale deed bearirig Joi.flos.+O+tr/2001 to 4o4At2OO,dt.27.6.2001, sale deed bearing doc.no..675/05, dt. 29.8.2003, agreement of sale cum GPA doc.nos. 4513/2006, dt. 22.6.mO1,, Ooc.no.tOSSOiZObO, Ot. 8.5.2005, development cum GPA doc.no.8355/06, dt. 10.4,2006 and doc.no.4136/2006 dt. 20.2.2006 and iv) declare the subsequent sale transactirrns in Sy.No.46 of Gachibowli Viilage are null and void in view of the fraud and stal utory Provision. 1 Petitior under section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the re:;pondents to maintain status quo orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP Nos.6093/2006 and 701312006' dt' 8'9'2006' "1 i.'; I' rrt. ii.' Petition under Section '151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavii filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass orders suspending the orders of the Vice-Chairman, HUDA(CDA) in Lr.No.13092/Ep/CDA/200G, dt. 15.5.2007, building permission sanctioned by the Hyderabad Municipal Oeputy Commissioner, SerilingampallV,--2919' .-G^reater corpoiation virle proceedings No.G/353/BPl2611l2Oo7, dt. 19.5.2007 sanctioned for the construction of Residential/Mufti Stored Resi-Complex/Building consisting sub Cella(partly), cellar + ground + 9 floors vide proceedings No.c/353/Bii:2G1112OO7, dt. 19.5.2007 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such otht:r order or orders. OF Petition under section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to receive the ad,Jitional documents in continuation of the already filed documents in material papers in this writ Peitition filed before this Hon'ble court and to consider the doiumentr; i.e., copies of Sesala Pahanies and Adangal Pahanies for the years .1954-55 to 20.1 4-15 of Gachibowli Village, serilingampally Mandal, Ranga iteddy District and other crucial documents which are now filed by the Petitioners in this Writ Pet tion. soF Petition under section 'l 51 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit f iled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the original tenancy record of 1958 U/s. 37-A, Form 'B' and the mutation entries made in the record oi rights after issuance of the certificate as per Rule .6. and Sesala Pahanitls for the years 1955-58 of the Sy. Nos' 37' 40, 42,43' 44' 45,46' 47.51,52 an,l 53 admeasuring Ac. 157-03 Gts. and all the original revenue records right from 1954-55 to till date from Tahsildar. serilingampally Mandal to decide the issue whether the respondents have the status of 37-A on the total 203 lands and the batch of civil revision petitions and decide the mattec after having perused the said original records and the ehtitlement of respondents who are the petitioners in the writ petitions and the batch of civil revision petitions and to @nsider whether the record U/s 37-A on these lands in Sy. tlos. 37,40, 42. 43, 44, 45, 46. 47 , 51 . 52 and 53 admeasuring Ac. 157-03 Gts, of Gachibowli Village' Serilingampally Mandal, Range Reddy District at any time exist or not. 7Il Petition under Section 151 of CPC pralang that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased set aside the permissions, proceedings and memos passed by the Govemment and the Sale Deeds which are created, manipulated and fabricated; illegally, unlawfully, fraudulently, malafidely and high handedly wttich documents are mentioned and furnished below for kind perusal and kind consideration of this Hon'ble Court. lA NO:4 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praylng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the state and its authorities to file the counter affidavit in W.P. No. 3860 of 2008 to effectively adjudicate the matter. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI C HANUMANTHARAO ?t Counsel for the Respondent No.l : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,5,6,7 : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent No.9 : rcEIIr.]Itr Counsel for the Respondent No.11 : SRI J PRABHAI(AR WRIT PETITION NO: 6759 oF 2017 Between: M. Yadaiah, S/o late Kondaiah, Aged 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ryo. Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District. ...Petitioner AND

1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner Tank Bund, Hyderabad

2. The Dy. Commissioner Circle -Xl, Serilingampally GHMC, H$erabad. 204

3. Mr. APal Shaik, S/o. late Shaik Mohammed R/o. H,No.1 0-3-284U Nglg, Humayan Nagar 33 years, Occ Business , Hyderbad

4. Mr. H. AKhar, S/o. late Syed lmam aged 9, Nizam ColonyToli Chowki, 52 years, Occ Business R/o. Hyderabad.

5. Mr. Mohammed Adil, S/o. Mohammed Private Employee, Fi/o. H.No.8-1 Chovrd<i, H$erabad. 1 65 years, Occ. Colony, Toli

6. Mr.'Moh-ammed-Khadeer, S/o. Mohammed Yaqub, Business, R/o. H.No. 8-1-398/PM/187, Paramount Hyderabad. Aged about 62 years, Occ. Colony, Toli Chowki, 1of Nos. 5 and 6 are impleaded as per C.O.dt . 13.11 .2024 in lA No. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to is$ue a writ, order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the inaction on part of respondents No. 1 and 2 in removing the illegal structures made by unofficial respondents inspire of issuance of notice No. 27O2TPS|C-I1,WZGHMC|2O17. Ot-16-O1-2017 as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Law and Molative of Article 14 and 21 of the Cohstitution of lndia, consequently direct respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to take positive steps to remove the illegal structure which is subject matter of above said notice Dt-16-01-201 7- l.A. NO: I OF 20{7(WP . NO:830O OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit ,{iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd resporrdent to take further action of removal of unauthorized structure pursuant to notice issued by him vide Notice No. 27o2,TPSlC-lllWZlGHMCl2OlT, Dt:16-01-2017. Counse! for the Petitioner :SRl D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Nos.l & 2 : SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY(SC FOR GHMC) Counsel for ther Respondent No.4 : SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel forthe, Respondents Nos.S & 6 : SRI A P REDOY 205 Betureen: K. Sudhir Kumar, S/o. Late Amar Sundar, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Govt. Employee, R/o. Joumalist Colony, Banjara Hills, Hyder:abad. .Petitioner AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep., by its - Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy Dist, Lakdikapool, Hyder:abad 3. The Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District Principal Secretary, Revenue

4. The Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District

5. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep., by its Commissioner, Hyderabad ...Respondents 6. Mr. B. Ashok Babu, S/o. Late Venkatanarayana, Age 57 yebrs, Occ Business, R/o. Plot No .143, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. R6 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 1811012022 in l.A. No.312O22.

7. J. Upendra Reddy, S/o J. Narasimha Reddy, aged about 62 years, Occ. Retired Employee, Resident of First Floor, Sai Krupa Four Regent, House No. 2-2-251 pl7l1 0 1, D. D.Colony,Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

8. B. Narender Reddy, S/o B. Narayan Reddy, aged about 59 years, OCC. Service, Resident of Plot No.289 B, Sri Ram Nagar, Kondapur, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-500084

9. L. Vishnu Chandana, S/o N. Dheeraj Reddy, aged about 32 yearc OCC. Employee, Resident of H.No. 12-10-769, Flat No.301, Shreya Homes, Namala Gundu, Secunderabad.

10. Smt. Vempati Sailaja, W/o A. Chaitanya Srinivasa, aged about 34 years, Occ. Private Employee, Resident of Flat no.404, B.R.Mansion, Goutami Enclave, Botanical garden Road, Kothaguda, Hyderabad-500084, Telangana State. 1 1 . M. Narasimha Rao, S/o M. Satyan arayana, aged about 55 years OCC Business, Resident of 16-3-211437,Bhagath Singh Nagar, KPHB, Kukatpally, Hyderabad -500085, Telangana.

12.Smt. Satyamma, W/o. M. Adivayya, aged about 60 years, Occ. House Wife, Resident of House No.4-94, Sangareddy, Medak DisJrict. Respondent Nos. 7 to 12 are impleaded as per C.O.dt. 13.11.2A24 in lA No. 112023. 206 13',Diamond Hills Societyr Plot .51, Diamond I'lills, , Telangana Secretary Sri B. Narender v. ,'o'N,.'oJilr,H.at"*,Ygtf 5oo 03:2. xI6l,iffi :..emH'fi fr J,"3f;n.','&,i?,''rT.H[3a 1 5. B. Javanthi, W/o. B. Narender Reddy, Aged about 51 ygaF'-q99: tlguse Wife' '"'"Ri;. 6i.;i il6.d6s-B, sli Ram Nagar, Kontapur, Hvderabad- 500 085' KhadEer, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, 16.Mr. Mohd. di, F-arariroint Hills Coloniy, Tolichowki, Hyderabad. RYo:l.l.f\lo.8-1 Resporrdent Nos. 13 to 16 are impleaded as per C.O'dt' 13'11'2024 in lA No' 212023' S/o.

17.Smt.Meka PtotNo.l8 kar, about 58 Years, Occ. Service, R/o i, Hydeabad, 500 032.

18.Smt. Nethi Mshnu Vandana, Wo Nethi Vittal, aged. about 58 ygaq' ' "' fi;l;'+i;ru, o29. i-z-iuD't,'o"malasuda' Himavathnasar' Hvderabad' 500 -H6'

19. Meka Retired Nagar., l'hase-i, Rao, RespondentNos.lTtqlgareimpleadedasperC.o.dt'13.11.2024in1ANo. 112024.

20.BeesanrShobhaRani,W/o.B.RamReddy,agedabout52years'Occ: -- i"ri"*tr", R/o. H. tlo. 1_4_1ylN8t3, Kamata Nehru cotony, Mahabub Nagar Districf, Telangana State. 2l.Anil Kurnar Mote, S/o. Late M. Uppal Reddy, aged about 55 years' Occ: _sott.,"n,Engineer,R/o.FlatNo.402,KrishnaKunjApartments.SBlLane' Himayathnagar, Old MLA Quarters, Hyderabad'

22.N. Pavani ReddY, Wo . Anil Kumar Mote, aged about 54 years, Occ: Doctor, R/o. Flat No. 402, Krishna Kunj Apartments, SBI Lane, Himayathnagar, Old MLA Quarters, HYderabad

23.DhomreddY Rajashekar ReddY, S/o. D Penta Reddy, aged about 46 years' Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 8-2-293/8218, Plot No. '133/A, Road No. 10C, Gayathri Hills, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

24. B. Ravinder Reddy, S/o. B. Yella Reddy, aged about 36 years, occ: Business, - nlo. H. No.8-2-293l8ZB' Plot No' 133/A, Road No 10C' Gayathri Hills' Jubilee Hills; Hyderabad, Telangana State Reddy, S/o D. Penta Reddy, aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 2-4811218. Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli Village, Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' Hyderabad-32 Telangana SerilingampallY State

25.4 207

26.D. Anuradha, Wo. D. Mallesh, aged about 53 years, Occ: Housewife, Ri/o. H. No. 2=.48/8, Telecom Nagar, near RTTC, Gachibowli, Serilingampally Mandal under GHMC, Serilingampally Circle, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

27.Abburi Vani, Wo. A. Venkata Ramana Naidu, aged about 54 years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. H. No. 111/A, Sriram Nagar Colony, Kondapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District - T.S.

28.Jangom Sujatha, Wo. Jangom Upender Reddy, aged about 66 years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. lst Floor, Sai Krupa Four Regent, H. No.2-2-25lPl7,O.D. Colony, Hyderabad.

29.Nukala Narasimha Reddy, S/o. N. Venkat Reddy, aged about 66 years, Occ: Business, Ri/o. H. No. 1-7-59, JSM Colony, Street No. 8, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

30. Nukala Aruna, Wo. Nukala Narasimha Reddy, aged about 62 years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. H. No. 1-7-59, JSM Colony, Street No. 8, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana State. 3l.Nookala Jyothi, Wo. Nookala Rama Chandra Reddy, aged about 72 years, occ: Housewife, Rl/o. H. No. 14-702132/61, Padma Colony, Nallakunta, Musheerabad; Hyderabad, Telangana State.

32. Kankanala Vijaya Laxmi, Wo. Late K. Veeranjaneyulu, aged about 77 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H. No. 1-9-10, Kapra Village, Kapra Municipality, Ranga Reddy District.

33.T. SudhirReddy, S/o. T. Lakshma Reddy, aged about 48 years, Occ: NRl, R/o. Plot No.96, Vinayaka Nagar, Beside lDBl Bank, Gachibowli, Hyderabad -32.

34.Jammula Sadhana, D/o. Sunil Kumar Jammula, aged about 34 years, Occ: Housewife, Ri/o. H. No. 8-2-293BAPN/99, Prashasan Nagar, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

35.Sunil Jammula, S/o. Krishnan Reddy Jammula, aged about 63 years, Occ: Govt. Employee, Rl/o. H. No.8-2-293l82lPN/99, Prashasan Nagar, Road No. 72, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

36.Puligadda Videhi, Wo. Puligadda Siva Rama Kumar, aged about 64 years, Occ: Household, FUo. H..tlo. 1.10.304/518, Brahmanwadi, Begumpet, Hyderabad - 16. 3T.Gogineni Radha Krishna, S/o. Late Venkatappiah, aged about 77 years, Occ: Retired Service, Rl/o. H. No. 13-D. No. 158/'t4, Nidubrolu Village, Ponnur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

38.T. Jaganmohan Reddy, S/o. T. Lakshma Reddy, aged about 45 years, Occ: Employee, R/o. Plot No. 96, Vinayak Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 208

39.T. Ma,canrnohan Reddy, s/o. T. Lakshma Reddy, aged about 45 years, occ: Ernplc,yee, Rrj/o. plot No. 96; Vinayak Nagar, e"thioo*ri, nyolradaa'

40.Gadip;alli Ramakrishqa leo.dy @ Gadipalli Ramakrishna, s/o. Gadipalri !!a{na RddY, ry"d about 46 years, Occ: Software EngineeinfolFrot f'.ro. 48, Flert !to..10!, Veera Towers, Jaya Nagar, opposit" (p.n-.g. doiony, Kukagrally, Hyderabad, Telangana State.-

41.. Bandaru Avender; s/o: Bandaru saidulu, aged about 46 yegrs, occ: Business, R/o. H. No.1-21, chinna Thumm-atagrdu, MlLgE, i,larretpalty Mandal, Natgonda District, Telangana State. Resporrdent No-120 to 41 are impleaded as per court order dated 05112t2o24 in l.A.No.2 ot 2O24. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hi'gn'c;rrt may be pleased to issue order or orders or direction or writ more parttuhrly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus dectaring the action of the 2nd responOent in passing impugned orders dt.24'og-2016 in rrsqoatzol3 and batch setting aside ordgrs of the 3rd resporrd.ent-h-ereinlS-1o.20.13 in proceeding no. G/26gotzo,l3 as illegal, arbitrary and viola,tive of Art-14, 21 and 300-4 or ine Constitution of lndia and, violative of principles of naturat iustice and consequenly set aside the same and. restore our rigl'rts as per the orders dt.15.1 o.2013 in proceedings No. G/26g ol2o13 of the 3rd respondent. IA :1OF 19 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ne Hign court may be pleased to direct the respondentr; to maintain status Quo in F2t{40}l2ots and batclr in regard to possession, title'and ownership and nature of the property pending disposal of the writ petition. IA 20F Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, tne Htgn Court *"y O" pteased to lyggend the operation of orders of the 2nd respondent dated 24-09-2016 in F21540812013 arrd batch pending disposal of the wrii petition. 209 Petition under Sec{ion 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed [n support of the petition, itre Higtt may be pleased to set aside the permissions; poceedings and rnemos passed by the Government and the Sale Deeds which are . created, manipulated and fabricated; illegally, unlawfully, fraudulently, malafidely and high handedly which documents are mentioned and fumished below for kind perusal and kind conskleration of this Hon'ble Court. 'Court Counsel forthe Petitionei:SRl KEERTHI KIRAN KOTA Counsel for the Respondents Nos.{ to 4 : GP fOR REVENUE The court made the followlng : GOMMON ORDER ,,./ {} : ! I i I I : : i I I i ! I I I I i I I r I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BIIASKAR RIDDY Writ Petition Nos.386O/2(X)8. 6759/2O17 and 1tr 157/2O19 1071 2437 and, COMMO.N ORDER: The issues involved in these cases are intrinsically intercor:nected ancl therefore, they have been heard:together and are being disposed of bv this common order. l',

2. W.P.No.386O of 2008 is filed seeking following.relief: "...t<r issue a Wnt or order or orders more partianlarlg one in tte nature of Writ of Mandarnrr.s i) to declare the crt,rrr;rrron orders issued bg the Stale eaverrtment in G.O.Ms.IVos.tBt6. dt t8.IO.2OO5; 2183, dt.27,12.2005 etc., recotnmencled by .Sirr:r'rrrl Officer and Competent Authoritg, Urbcn Land C,eili,tg, Ilyde:rriltcul. oJtltroued building plans of llte Chabftan, HUDA(CDA), lly<l<'r<ttttul t,itle: I.r.No. 13O92/BP/CDA/2006, dt:15.5.2007 and the plart .sorr('lr()rl ctpgtroued for multi storbd a nWle* uide proa:edings G/ .t:i.ti'tlt'/ )bl I i 2007, dt.19.5.2007 of Dqutg Municipal Cornrnrssiorr<,r. *'rtltrtqrtrrrpollq, Greater Hgderabad. Municipal Corpo ratio r t rrs r/k'rlrr 1; ii) to set asicle tlu' s(rrrrc c.5^ urged by the Joint C.olldor-l, Ranga Reddg Distnct uide Lr No .,\('),'111,'.,lrt4/ 75, dt.2o.10.2007 as the respnndents 12 to 33 haue,: no ntllrt ttt lr<ttrsltr arrq inchof land tn Sy.lVos. 35,36,37,40, 42, 43, 44. 45. ,16. t)- untl 53 part of Gachibowli Wage in uiew of tle surrender of tlu. t(,tuncu r'ltrirn irt proceedings of tte Tahsildar in procezdinss ,\'<.r.rl.i. I O8o5,/ 64. dated 1 8.2.1965; A3/3749/65, dnted 2.4. 1,)65: A4/ )5(tt l<)(t(>. tluted 16. lO.1966 and fulal list utas also publi:;hecl stett,tq tlrt Nil. t(netr-A and ils conftrmationthmughorders of Reuer'.ue f)iutsrorrrtl ()llic<'r rtr l-RW/47/75, dt.31.5.1975 antd in uieut of the orders oJ'I{<trr l,/t' Srrlrrerne Court in Cidl Appeal Nos.6O93/2OO6 and 70 I3i2O0() ctrrcl tlu .slctrr.s t1u<t orciers dt.8.9.20o6 granted bg the Hon'ble Sup re nrc C'.ou 11 t t t t t I c(, t tse( | t ( | tl tall y' iii) to direct tlrc resltonck:rrt.>^ I 0 ctttd 1 I to stop all illqal cr.nstrucfion ouer the dispttt<zd latul r:rvl rl<'clar<, tle .iraudulent GPA of respondents 13 to I'' V<ttrucJoltctl i?eddg the sale deeds bearing 31 [rt feuort, I 2 CRP No.5279l2016 & Bat; CVBRJ {--\ {. r'"' doc"Nos.2887/2oo3, to 2goo/20o3, ueuted. on 1o.3.2oo3 and. sale ded bearhg (rc1tos, 4646/2001 to 4&g/20o, dr.27.6.2oQ1, sate ded. bear''tng docno.675/05t..4rrn.U.2\O3, agreeqeSt. of sie anm GpA drc-nos. 4513/2006, .dL22.6-2OO1, dx.no,10S36/2006, dt.g.S.2OOS, deuelopmentatm-GPA doc.rw.83SS/06, dt.IO.4.'2OO6 and dac. no. 4 1 36/ ?A,06, dL 20. ?. 20 06 and.;' iu) declare tle subseqtterrt sale transactions in sy./vo.46 of Gochibowli village are null a nd wid in uiew of the fiaud and. siatutory prouisbn. -."

3. Civil Revision Petition Nos.5279, 5570, 5631, 5632, 5633, 5634, 5635, 5665, 5666, 5667 ,566g, 5690, 56g 1, 56g3, 56g6, 573L, 5732, 5858, 6L64, 6461, 6479,6503, 6504 of 2OL6; 6, 2tO, 2tg, 377, ggg, ggg,1070, to7t, 1lgg, 15gg, 1gg2, 1g3g, 1951, 2046, 2437 and 316o of 2aL7 under section 9I of the Andhra pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, l95o {for short "the Tenancy Act; 19501 are filed challenging the common order dated 24.09.2016 passed in case No.F2l5ao8l2ot3 and batch, by the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District.

4. Mr.Yadaiah, (the petitioner, who {iled C.R.P No.5279 of 2016l, has f-rled Writ Petition No.6759 of 2Ol7 seeking to declare the inaction on the part of offrcials of Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation (GHMC) in removing the illegal structures made by the unoflicial respondents inspite of issuance of Notice No.27O2lTPS/C- ILIWZIGHMC/2017 as illegal, arbitrary and for oLher appropriate reliefs. fr.tr 3 CRPNo.5279D0t6 &Batch / CVBR,J

5. \['.P.No.11157 of 2OL9 is filed by the Seeking following relieft "...tc issue ord.er or orders or direction or writ nareiiaa.tiatt4rlg irc,intlte nattre of writ of Mandamus declaring the action ol the zltd respgndent in pas.sing impugned orders dt.24.O9.2OI 6 in F2/ 51rO8/ 2013'.'and batch setting aside orders of tte 3'd respondent hsein 15.7O:2O13 in proceeding No.G/2690/2O13 as illegat, arbrtraty and. vta.lqtiW'of Art14 21 ond 3OOA of the Constitution of India and. fitafrib of prirciples of nafi,'.ro) justice and consequentlg set ?side :tfe:'sclliie 'aid- restoie petitioners rights as per the orders dt.L5.702o73'in iifocxzedings . '-, t, . ,': ..i :.. FAC?S OF THE CASE:

6. The relcvant facts necessary for adjudication qf; the present cases are: briefly set out below: I . . , i I L-. I I I I I I i : i ; It is stated that one tlyas Burni was tUa o*"ar of land 7. admeasuring Acs.93.25 Gts. in Sy.Nos.44, 45, 46,, 5, 52 and 53 '1. ..r.' . ' .-i: ' ... .. . .:.., -r'.:];j ' . situated at Gachiborvli Village, Rajendranagar Taluk,-, Rangareddy District. lt is further sLzrtecl that on 22.O2.L9+O, Lingamma, who is ;..1 pattadar :[ lerncl admcasurir-rg Acs.63-18 Gts. in Sy. Nos.37, 40,42, 43 and 47, sold the st-rrnt: to ll1,3s Burni. Consequently, Ilyas Burni . - ;, . ' . : became ttre pzrttaclar o[ tht' litrtcls aclrneasuring Acs.157-03'Gts. in Sy. Nos.37, 40,4'2, 43, 44, 45, 46, 5l and 53 of GachibowliVitlage. tt is .,', also stated that on 2l.Ob. 1946, Lingamma sold Acs.l7-OO Gts. in Sy.No.SO i-o Halcema Khatoon. Ilyas Burni also purchased Acs. 9.O8 Gts. in Sy'. No. 35 anrl Acs. 7-O6 Gts. in Sy. No. 36 of Gachibowli village. In the year lc)50, Ilyzrs Burni became the absolute owner of .? t \a. , 4 CVB&J CRP No.5279120 16 & Batch (i, Acs. 19O-17 Gts. in various survey numbers of Gachir-xr-^wli Village. In the year 1952, Lingamma stated to have fired a suit viae o;s.No.1 r/ 1 of L952 seeking declaration of her title against tlre alleged tenants and others and the said suit was decreed. Aggrieved by the same, the tenants filed A.S.No.2S of lg5g. In the year 195g, a list of protected tenants was prepared under section 37-A of ttre Tenanry Act. It is further stated that on 02.09.196l, the darrghters of Ilyas Burni sold an extent of Acs.l57-03 gts comprising in several'"r*, numbers to M/s.Kastopa corporarion, represented by'Kantilal c. seth. It is alsq stated that on 28.g. 1964, an extent of Acs.33- 14 Gts. forming part of sy.Nos. 35, 36 and 5o was purchased by the Kastopa corporation. Thus the Kastopa corporation became the owner and landlord for total extent of Acs.t90-i7 Gts. It is stated that on 2o.2.196s, a compromise petition \ /as jointly lited by tenants before the Tahsildar, Hyderabad west, surre.clcring their tenancy rights in respect of some of the lands and rtre same was accepted, and their narnes were allegedly deletecl from rhc lenancy register. A.s.No.2S of 195g was decreed on 31.8. 196.) crury recording the compromise said to have been entered by partics to the suit. It is stated t.Lat on 16.10. Lg66, the remaining te nanrs surrendered tenancy rights before the Tahsildar and it is allcged that their names were deleted from the final tenancy regisrer. After the Andhra pradesh tand Reforms (ceiling on Agriculrural t{oldings) Act, lgz3 (for short "coAH Acr, 5 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch lg7g"l came into force, the Kastopa Corporation frled a declaration under Section 8 of the CoAH Act before the Land Refolms Tribunal (for short "LRT"), Hyderabad West, in C.C.No.265ll)l75 without showing the protected tenants over the subject lands and other lands in dispute. It is stated that on 17.03.1975, several individuals claiming to be protected tenants liled an objection petition seeking owners;hip rights under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act. Pending adjudi<:ation of the same, it is stated that a compromise petition was filed bv the tenants waiving their rights in respect of certain lands. On 31.05.1975, the Land Reforms Tribunal dismissed the petition filed b5, the protected tenants and allowed the petition of Kastopa Corporation (dectarant) and rejected the claim of the tenants for issuanc,e of Certificate under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act. On

9.12.1975, the Tribunal declared that Kastopa Corporation was holding an excess of 2.2862 Standard Holding under the CoAH Actl The appeal vide LRA No. tO of Lg76 filed by the Kastopa Corporation was dismissed on O6.O4.1,976, and further challenge in CRP (SR) No.2469t8 of 1976 was dismissed on 28.4.1976. Kastopa Corporation frled a petition on 05.05. 1976 for surrender of Acs. L37.17 Gts towards surplus land. On 04.09.1976, notice calling for objections was pul>lished and it is stated that no objections were filed. On

06.10. L9t76, the surrender proceedings were approved and possessi'fn was allegedly taken by th€ Revenue lnspector on I i 6 CVBR,J CRP No.52?920t6 & Barch 11

13.10.1976. on 24.or.rgzg, a notice ,.rd". RuIe rz(?t was issued and published in the A.p. Gazette, wherein it is stated.that no claims were filed by alleged protected renants. In April, lgzg, a notice under Section 16 of the coAH Act was issued regarding determination of compensation for the surrendered land. The Government issued G.O.Rt.No.594 Revenue (e) Department, dated 2O_O4=tgZ9 granting lease of part of rands surrendered by Kastopa corpgra{on in favour of National Director, Maharshi tnstitute of Creatirre Intelhgence. The Tahsildar vide procecdings No.B4/49salzg dated 06. Ll.rgrg granted succession to legal heirs of some o.f therdeceased:tenants. challenging the said G.o, rhe tenants filed writ petition.xo.+sgo or 1980 stating that they arc lhe protected tenants of the lands a'd are in possession a.d enjo_vrncnt of the lands and claimed rigfuts under the provisions o[ tirc Tr:nancy Act. The said Writ' petition was disposed of vicrc .rcii:r rrirrcd 17.o2.rgg] directing to conduct an enquiry by rhc c.llcc'r.r or an.y such other offrcer as may be designated b-y hinr n()t trclor.r' the rank of the Reverlue Divisional oflicer (for short 'RD()'), inro thc questions whether the petitioners were declarecl as prot(:ctcd tenants and whether they have surrendered rhc rc.ilnr:.\. rigtrts or not and acc6ffiingly, the enforceability of thc ().(). impugned in the writ petition, would depend upon the *:sult o[ rhc enquiry. It is stated that in pursuance of the saicl dircction. rtrc Revenue Divisional oflicer, chevella I I I I I I i i I I i t : I i i i i i l i ' o 7 CVBR,J CRP No.5279t20t6 & Batch ';,'i : fRDo/orisrnal AuthoritS/), conducted detailed enquiry in File No.G/1565/81 and submirted reporr dated 2z-oz_.Lg81 holding that sri Khnndmet Balaiah Manikond.a Kord.aiah, Gadd.a Mai.saiah ard. Derlapalli Babaia,hare protected. @nants under sbction 37A of Tenancul Act and their n,,mes uEte included. in tlte tenancy register in the aear 195.3 and there is no sturend.er of rights und.er section 19 of Tenancy Act in resped, of fiese persons. The rerevant findings of the RDo Repcrt are extracted hereunden '......-tl* tenancg reard prcpared. in the gear r95r u/s.34 is the one qnd _o.ne is prepared u/s.32-A in lgSg- In tte tenancA record. another prepared iy the aeu lg1l_:-the-foilowing n,,mes onrg of the petitioners are lbund agailwt land"s fn S.lVos.37, 40, 4i, 43 and qzl ini"n'are pant of the land.s @n@rnd. leretn-

1. Kanrumet Balaiah 2. Manilartda Kondaialt 3, Derlapalli Babaiah . 4 Canjagi Narasaiatt Ehtt these na,,es utere- derded rounding of the entnes with an er''d'orsem'ent infie reyngrrs orumn bg the r.,nshaa, ,n* ,tr.y atong with ot'\er protected tenants ruve surrendJred. their rights ut i t ioy tne Act. Irt tlr,= tenancy reard of !eS! prepared. u/s.3/A, on- wtti.ch only the petitioners are rergirw,.the fouowiig names only anrorrg trte petrtioners tenants on-ott tands coicemed-hun,i inctttdini {;t {::222yrotected l. ,Kannamet Balaiah

2. )Wanilonda Kondaialt

3. Ganjayi Narasaiah

4. Lterlapalli Babaiah All <rtlter petitioners ncane-s are not found. in the te^ancy record prepared. in 1958. )(x xx. ''.1. af. . -l 8 cvB&J CRPNo;97912016 & Batch a '.....The petitioners af SL/Vos.7, 2, 3 and. 4 orilg ate. fot ltd to lutp 'declared as proteeted tenants under the prorrisions of fu-37'A of the A.P. (LA/ Ternncg and. Agrianltttrat Lands Ad, 79fi inthe geor 19#t.ontle tands onerned heiein uiz-, 37, 40, 42 to 47, 51, 52 and 53 total admeasuring Ac.157-O3 gts., of &chibouli Vi$age. thc remainfury petitioners are found to luue riot declard. as protcdd. tenants on tle said lands under the provisions of *c"37-A of Tenancg Ac/- T'he proeedings of the Tahsildar dated 06.11.1979 inuthichtlte nama of all these petitioners were broughl to reord are found. wid The petitbnar No.4 is found to haue died long baek (8 yars)...... )(x '....trilere euen presuming that the sunender ualidtg tookplae infatnur of tle landlolder to the extent of the suit la nd.,s, thete. remain still somc more lands in S.Nos.44, 45, 46, 51, 52 and 53 on whidt no sunender u/s.19 took ptace as no evidence of proeedings u/s.19 of the Ad lrr.s ben produed. Tluts, it is clear that tlere has beqt strrendct of ngb W tle petitioners and'their predecessors-in- interest on tle land"s in SNos.37, 40, 42, 43 and 47 in the year 1965 in fawur of StrX. linganmd. in pursuance of the compromise decree in A.S. No.25 of 1958, tltottgh slte wos not lalding anA patta rights on that dag and this sarrender annot be deemed for the rights giuen in tle gear 1958 tttough t e ptoteded tenants were neuer in possession ight from 1958 as per tle entries in the uillage accounts (pahanies).... " - "..... Since the issue is of the surrender and that too awrding to lant; the erttngushnlent oJ nghl ts rtot the sublect matter to ddde, it is not desiratte for me to Eue specific findings on it. Here oaidirtg to laut mec:ns according to the. promsions auailoble in the Tenancg Ad for making surrender o.f tenancy ights. Tle section 19 of said. Act lags provtsion for surrender. Ac.cording to which it slnuld. be in uritittg and is: admitted before the 'fctltstlclar and it slwuld be made in gaod faith to the satisfaction of the. Tctltstldar. No evidene of the afrion to)cen or proceedings concluctecl uncler section 19 of tle Act, utas prcdud. ........Ttuts, it can clearly be' sand tho,t no such process of sutendcr bg the protected ten6lils petilKrrktrs u/ s. l9 for the rights acqtired u/ s.37'A has took place so far. lttougtr the petrttoners claim that tley are in possesston and enjoynlenl rs fourttl ba-se/ess.... "

8. Relying on the said report dated 27.O7.1981, the tenants filed W.P.No.4O59 of 19t12 s;ecking to declare ,1"* as prot€cted tenants of 'the agricultural lands covercd by lands in Sy.Nos. Nos.37, 40,42,43, 44,45,46,47,51, 52 and 53, admeasuring Ac.157-O3 guntas situated at Gachibowli village, Rajendranagar Taluk, Ranga Reddy d/ d,r? 9 CVBR.J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch District and fon g_ranq o{ benefits under Sections 38(E} and 38A and B of Tenancy Act, 1950 notwithstanding any proceedings under the CoAH Act, 1973. The learned Single Judge relying on the report of the RDO referred above, allowed the said Writ Petition vide order dated

15.07.1987 and directed the respondents therein to grant certificates under Section 38-E of Tenancy Act in respect of lands admeasuring Ac.73.O3 gts aqd pelmrtted the petitioners therein to file applications under Section 3p of the Tenancy Act, before the RDO.

9. :. 'While the matter stood ttaus, between 1986 and 1987, Kastopa Corporation execu,ted several sale deeds in favour o[ Diamond Hills Association, its rnerirbers and others (respondents in these revision \ cases). Questioning the orders passed in WP No. 4059 of 1982, the State filed Writ Appeal No.1420 of 1987 and the same ,*,as dismissed on 25.rJ1.1993. The said'order attained finalitl'as no appcal was prefern:d to the Hon'lcle Apex Court. The RDO, Chcvellzr, issued owners:rip certificates on 25.04.1995 undcr Se<:tion 3fJ-E to the protected tenants in respect of land admeasuring Acs 73.03 gts. The Kastoper Corporation frled an application datcd O 1.04. 1996 under Section 22(Il of the CoAH Act to re-open and rc-conrpLrtc the subject lands ol'declarations. The LRT reopened thc Case No.W/ 264175 on

31.07. L<.rg6 for re-computation''of the lands ancl thc szrid orcler was challenged by the State in LRA No.89/ 1996 on the file of t,RAT-cum-ll l0 cvBR J CRP No.52792016 & Batch i\ '-ll ' Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. The protected tenants were impleaded as respondents in the said appeal. The Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal on 2l.oz.lggz, holding that reopening the declarant's case was impermissible. Aggrieved by the same, Kastopa corporation filed cRp No. 3755 of 1997 and the same was disposed of on 6.11.1998, recognizing the rights of the protected tenants and directing re-computation oi holding of Kastopa corporation. The protected tenants filed applications dated 19.8. L996 under Sections 3.8-A and 38-B for sale certificates in respect of land admeasuring Ac.84-oo gts in Sy.Nos.46, 47, 51,52 and 53. Questioning the inaction of the respondents, the tenants liled w.P.Ns.3251 of 1998 and the same was disposed of on

09.02.1998 dilect-irrg t-tre R.D.o to dispose of the applications tiled by the protected tenants, expeditiously, in accordance with law. Meanwhile, the appeal l-rled by the Authorizrd cfficer under the coAH Act, 1973 questioning the issuance of Section 38-E certificates \ /as dismissed by the Joint collector vide Proceedings No.B4/48o211996 dated 20.06-1998. In pursuance of the same, Tribunal re-computed the holding of Kastopa corporation, declaring surplus of 0.62636 standard Holding on 18.2.L999. 'l'he LRT on 26.05.L999 directed surrender of lands in sy.Nos. 46, 47 and 53. The Declarant Kastopa corporation offered to surrender the said lands. Questioning the same, the tenants liled appeal uid.e LRA No.13/2OOO and rhe same CVB&J CRP No.5279DOl6&Batch \ras ellow€d.on 29.O9.2OOO and the matter was remitted back for fresh rlisposal to:consider the claims of protected tenants.

10. [n the meanwhile,-the tenants filed W.P.No.l47OB of 1999 and by orcler dated 20.09:1999, the said writ petition was disposed of directing the authorities to consider the applications of tenants under Section 38-A of the Tenancy Act. Thereafter, the Government issued G.O.M:s.No. 183 Municipal Administration and *{.Jrban Development dated '.1,4.O3.2OOO under the provisions of Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 (for short "UDA Act, 1975') notifying the subject lands and other lands as residentjal ?nne. The RDO granted sale certilicates on

28.4.2CtO1 under Section 38-A to protected tenants and declared Kastopa Corporation as non-surplus holder. On coming to know about the same, respondents in these revisions claiming to be purchar;ers from Kastopa Corporation (declaranL) filed appeal vide Case No.F2/49O2/2OOl before the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District. The Authoiznd. Officer under CoAH Act also filed appeal vide Case No.F2/49O312OO2. The Joint Collcctor vide common order dated O9.L2.2OO3 allowed the appeals by setting asidc the order dated 28.O4.2OO1 passed by the RDO in Case No.G/36aO11996 granting sale certificates, holding that most of ttrc cerLilicatc holders had sold their lands and relinquished their tenancy rights. Challenging the same, the protected tenants filed CRP No.67O8 of .-l'_ } t2 CVBR.J CRP No.5279 /20 t6 & Bateh ,) 2oa3 and the stab'Government filed cRp No.l2oo of 2oo3.. on 07.lo.2oos, cRp'No.670g of 200s was allowed and cRp No.1200 of 2oo3 was dismissed..Aggrieved by the same, civil Appeal No.3os4 of 2006 and batch were filed before the Honble Apex court and the Honble Apex court uide order dated or.L2.2olo while allowing the appeals had set aside the order dated oz.lo.2oo5 and remitted the matter to the High court. The questions framed by the Hon,ble Apex court for determination by the Honble Division Bench of this court are as follows: "l' whether the respordc ts or fieir predeessors were, at ana stage, rearded .as prctedd. tenants in reqect of rand measunng r 9o acres I 7 q'lnta's sifiidein.$nteig jvos. ss, s6,37,-40,42-47, so-s| of Gachibowri Village, *ry"ryalli Mandat, Ranga Reddg D.srncr, t.tyaerafract o, ang portiontheraf7 ?._YgY, the fird,ings^ reandd. bg the RDO in his enqutry report ctated 1 in resped, of (e the status of respond"ents as' p rie ct ect te r rct nt s 2 7: 7 -_1 2 9 t|/^s 3-7;A q'd (b) absene of proof of surrend.er in accorcr'art<:e wttrtser:fion l9 of the Act" uete chollenged by Kastopa corporatiorr. If not rrrrcrr*r the s-aid findings qtt be challenge-d bg tte successors irr rrrr.r..s[ ctf Kctstopa Corporation?

3. In ca.se, qtestions_No.l and 2 ahoue, are answerecr irt trtt, affimrcttiue, whether the reqnrtdr,nts or their predecessors had uaridrq surrctrrclerecl their tenancg righrs in awrdane uith the procedure Trr.sirnbecr !sr1 rctut. If so, iy tthich prwdings and. qua wniin surueg nrz,il,<,.s, tucts trte sunendermade? 4' wt,ther the sate of ptotsfiomthe gear 19g6 onwar<ls lttl L.I/ s.Krtstopa corporation and tle protedad tenanti infawur of the a14tt:ua,rts rutcl trre petitioners irytlo e,qmd. SIFs are ualid. tnuing ,"g")i trttcr.aln to tlrc prouisions of theTenanq Ad? 5' wlether the lands aveted by protected tenancq ngrfts tuere rictbre ro be exclurle!' f** tP ttotdi,g oli<o"apo corporatton ttrrtk:r the ()eilutg -anrl-, if theg hoti! ttot @n ucluded. initialiy, wttettrctr ttre atttttorities Act u.nder the @iling Act anttd exclude them subsequentry ril trre u$t..rce of the protected. tenants or the land. talder? 6- wetlrcr there was unuersion of tle land. use for house. srtes ancl non- agriatltural pury)oses in respect oy tne land,s in que.strorr irL accorclantce (-t l3 CVB&J CRP No.5279DOl6 &Bat h with law and if so, wlut is tle efd, of sttch orunrsibn on the rights of t'le partkis and.from uthich date utould the oruteision be effrctiue? ',7. Whether surplus ta.nd ta an utent of Ac' 137.17 guntas in &rueg l[os.35, 36, 37, 40, 42 to 47 and. 53 of Gachibowli Village had uested in tle gouetnment under Sbcfion 11 of the Andlva Prade.sh Land Reforms (Hling on Agrianlfr.tral twldings) Act, 1973 (lerein$er refered to as the '.tand. Reform.s ltd'). If so wh.etter, ang transadion bg wag of sale-deeds or otterutise bg the d'protrcted tenants' and tle 'pattadars' are uoid ab ittitio?

8. Wetler the eiling proeedings had. attairrcd finalitg with the dismissa/ of tte Ciutl Reuision Petition (SR) No.2a698 of 1976 bg a te'arned Single Judge of the High C-ourt uide Mcr dated 28.4.1976. If so u,hether tte same auld rat be reopened in Writ proedilqs and in tle a,b*ne of nrrczssary pofties or in ollateral proeedings lilce Ciuil R'euision Petition No. 3577 of 1997?

9. Having obtained a @nsent order dated 20.9.1999 (Justice A-5. Bhate's order) in Writ Petition No. 147O8 of 1999 for grant of rights under Section 3ll(a) in respect of, land in suruey numbers 46, 47 and 53 (Paikil to tle ettent of 37 acres, utether tlrc, respondents ould mutually agree for isrue o/ 38- A sale Cemftules qta land in annteg numbers 51, 52 and pc,rt 53 sold to the Petitioners lrcreinfor valuable ansideration? lct. Whether tlrc respondents are entitled to erffcr,tes under Section 38- A over &trueg IVos.SI, 52 & 53?"

11. On remand, the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide common order dated 25.02.2013 while disposing of C.R.P.No.67O8 of 2003 a.nd batch, remanded the matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella to decide certain issues. The relevant paragraphs of the saici common order dated 25.02.2013, are extracted hereunder: '60. In a particular case, multiple questiorts may arise, like whether a transfer is made to defeat the objects of tte ceiling law; whether a pan:ition effected is valid; whether an adoption is ualid; whether a di.sstolution of marriage is ualid; whetter a particular land is agricultural lancl etc. Such questions in the normal course have to be decided only bg the civil court or other authorities. But, all such questions fall within tle ju*diction of the LRT in view of 5.7(7)of @iling Act and the LRT b legk;latiuely empowered to decide all s-uch rssues. In our view, similarlg u/s.|3of tlrc Ceiling Act, tle LRT is onfetred the jurisdiction to determine issues whether a land or parl thereof stood statutorilg transfened to a protected tenant. Even otlentise, it would incongruous to hold that the LRT maA not decide tlr'se qtestions in the a.bsence of a t4 CVBR"J CRP No.527912016 & Batch o speciftc prouision in tle statute md. mnst relegate the parties to haue tlwn determhed beforctle oppropriateforumunder the general taw and keep the @tling p@i1rgs in abegane till alt anah qtestions are fully and finallg determind bg the hierarchg of auttnities or courts. In such co,*, it unutd. be easg for angbodg to raise ttrcse qtestions and houe prwdinjs befote the LRT rcept in abeganre for an indeftnite period. Such a constntcf;ian unid rcnder tl@ @iling Act unworkoble and. defeat the objets of tle AcL C;onc.tusiotts on issrzes 5, 7 ortd. Sfonnalatedbg the Supreme CourT:

61. On the ano;lgsis aboue, ue IDW on tlssue IVo. 5 framed by the $ryreme &urt tlut lands anM. bg protected tenancy rights (though liable to be qdudd. fum tte toldittg of Kastopa under the Ceiling Act first in uieut of S.JS, but atere not so exduded in 1975) canrwt be excludd. subsquentlg bg autlurities under the Ceiling Act, at the ir*tanrce of protedd trrtrrnts or the landlwlder. We hold on issue No. 7 tlut surplus land to an ertert of Ae 137.17 gts. in Sy. Nos. 35 to 37, 40, 42 to 47 and. 53 of Gachibouii village ha.d. irreuocably uested in the State under Section 11 of,the &iling Ad and ang transaction bg way of sale or otherutise in respect of tle said. land bg tlrc alleged protected tenatils artd tle pattedars is wid. ab initio, of no legal effect or cotlsequettce and iraperdiue. We also lald. on issue /Vo. 8 that Ceiling proceedings had attailtd. firul@ utth the drsmissal o/ C.R.P.S.R. No. 2a698 of 1976 on 28-04-1976 and tle safite. ould rwt be reopened in or qua writ prowding s or in alldeial prowdings.

62. In uieut of tle pabnt lack of jurisdiction, to reopen proceedings under the @iling Ad whidt altafuBd finalitg in 1975/ 1976, we hold th.at the order dated 28.4.2001 in'C.C. No. W264/75 of the Lanti Refonns Tribunal-RDO, Cleuella a,s ainfirmed in the order dat ed 2 I. 4 . 2 O O I t n L RA No. 16 of 2OOl dfien 2.9.2OO2 is witlaut juisdiction ancl a rullity. lrr exercise of our jurididion under S. 21 of the Ceilutg Act, tue qtash the saidorders. CRP No.I2OO/2OO3filedbg tl,e State rs ctccorclinghl allotttecl.

93. In our onsiderd. uieut, tte ansuers fo issues I to '1. 6. 9 ttrtcl l0 formulated bg tle fitprenle &urt are inextricably interttLturcd ttilh ttte issue wltetler the petitionas in C.R.P. No. 67O8 of 2OOJ Qre: pntte'cte;d tenants and uhdler rcqondcnts in the said C.R.P. lntt rtrty ngltt. tttlt' or interest inthe lands in 9y. lVos. 5I to 53 allegecllq Tturclxtserl ltq tlent. The seueral anlentiotts of tte respectiue partte.s acluerTecl to altoue highligltl the respdive stands and tle dilfailty irr orr.sruenrvl tlrc sarcl qtestions/issues in ercrcise of the cirqtmscribed rerisiorral Ttriscltctorr conferred on this C.auft under,Secfbn 92 of the Tewzrtcy Act

94. Tlere are olso *ueral other i,ssues uthich are ntenttone.d belou' (on tle ampeting contentiorts but not our which u)e haue twtdd. conclusions), ultidt mag tqtire artalgsis and resolutiort: a) Whetler G.O.Ms.No.rcs n[A dL 24.3.2000 issued under the A.P. Urbart Areas (Deuelopmenl) Ad., 1975 notifying the subject lancls as "resid"errtial use" zone talces auag tle jurbdiction of the authorities under tlrc Tenancg Actinttetigtttof S- 102(e)of theTenancy Act? l b t5 CVBR"J CRP N0:52791201 6 & Batch a'.{ b) Wlether tlte report of RDO dt.27.71981 ir.s anry.value and. uhetlter tte said olficial is unferred any jurisdidion to detcrmine uilto ii tle p,rotected tanc:nt in the tight of ktle 14 r/w Rute 26 of tlp Hgderabad. ql Whether respondents in CRP No. 67O8/2003 halte the loans standi to orntest tle application of tle petitioner.s therein for grurfi of sate azrtifiute u/s.38-Eor38-Aof the Tenanq.Ad or thq rnag otly qoproach the ciuil court or other appropriate forum to unuass tleir riglts, iJ any, in tle property purctnsed bg tlem ? dl Whether the order dt.9.12.1975 of the LRT determinfug tle lalding of the declarant Kastopa which has attained frnalitg *inAtis}as tle ,Wlds oftle petitioners in CRP. No- 6708/ 2003, if ong, under the Tenantq AA ? e) If the petitioners in CRP. No.67O8/2O03 are fourtd entitled to ov'tnership certificate u/ s. 38-E of ttrc Tenanrcg Act" utOul| t zclir rigrit to prtrchase u/ s. 38 or 38-A of the said Act get exhausted ? fl .ls it permissible tn law to grant of a joint ertificiilc eiller.y/s. 38-E or S. 38-A of the Tenancy Act to seueral persons daimhq to be ptoteded tenants? g) Whetlrcr the sale deeds relied upon bg tle respondents 8-72 in CRP No. 6708/ 2OO3 are uiolatiue of S. 38-D of tle Ad. and. if 9o, uhether tle sate deeds are uoid ?

95. TIE ResuIIr On the aforestated analyses, obseruations and orrclustotts: (a/ C.R.P.S.R. Nos. 24532 of 2Ol2 and 24636 of 2O12 cire dismissed uith costs poAable bq tlrc petitioners tlterein to tle priuate 'respondents therein. C.R P No. l2OO of 2OO3 is allowed raifh oosts o/Rs. IO,OOO/- pagable by Kctst<t1tct tct the State; (b) C.R.P. 6708/2003 ts allowed but withauf osfs and. tle order dt.28.4.2o01 of ttw RDO. Cleuella in Ref. No. G/364O/1996 and. the order dt.9.12.20}3 of the Joint Collector, Ranga Rddg District in Ref. F2/ 4902/ 20O I are set aside,' bl 'rne matte-r is renrtuecl to the RDO, Cheuellq to unsider afresh whether petitiorrcrs rn CRP. No. 6708/ 2OO3 are entitld to ownership certr.ficate u/ s. 38 E and/ or sale certificate u/ S. 38-A of tle Tinoncy Act in respect of land of an extertt Ac. 36.25 gts retained bg Ko^*opa (which is tl,.e balance left out of Ac. 190.17 gts (eqtiaalent to Ac" 190.42 gts) owned by it, afier deductirtg (i) Ac. 137.17 gts surrendered bg Kastopa to the State under the Ceiting Act, ond (ii) Ac. 17.00 dn Sy. No. 5O of Gaclibotuli tillage (irt which the petitioners neuer claimed tn be protectd. tenants), in S-y. /Vo. 5I, 52 and 53 of Gachibowli viltage, *rtlingampally MqndaL Ranga Recldy District, in the light of tle applications filed before the said authority; and to consider the issues set out in para 94'supra in 16 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch r., @n{omitg utith the &*rvdiions, attalgsr,s and. ondusions rwrded in this Jtdgment; apart.from rssues 7-4,6,9 and 1O formulatd. bg tl,e Suprcme &urt' fn ft's order dL 7.12.2010 in Ciuil Appeal No. 3054 of 2006, afier alfording opportttnitg n all offedd pa\nies ircluding R. 8-72 ard afier &tlg uerifiitlg all tle reletnnt recrlrds in oiginal; (d) Iibertg i,s preserued. to all the neoessarg and proper parties to addue evidene, oral or documentary as theg ansider appropriate. The entire exercise shall be oncluded bg the RDO, Cleuella, within 12 months from the dateof rwipt of aapg ofthis order; (e) Pending disposal of the matter afresh bg tte RDO, Cleuella, status qto prerniling cr.s on todag be maintained in all respeds bg all parties in respect of the tond of Ac. 36.25 gts in Sy.I\ro.SI, 52 and 53 of Cachibowli uilloge; (n mb Sfate is drctard. entitled to forthutith resume possession of the land of an ertent of Ael'37.17 gls in Sy.IVos.35-37, 40, 42-47 and. 53 parT of Gadtibowti Villoge, krilingampallg Mandal, Ranga Reddg District, which had. inetnublg uested in it under proursions of the Ceiling Act; and (g) As petitioners luue made no daim al any time that theg were protectd tenants in rcspect of land admeasting Ac17.0O in Sg.No.SO of Gachibowli uilloge, the dqision in ttese ccrses will tnt in any manner alfed tle purchasers orpossessors of the said extent of land." t t

12. [n pursuance of the aforesaid order dated 25.O2.29L3 passed in C.R.P.No.67O8 of 2OO3 and batch, the Special Grade Deputy Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Division, Ranga Reddy District (Original Authority), in Case No.G/269O12O13 passed the order dated 15. 1O.2O [3, wherein it was observed as under: o Summo;nt o f Co nclusions : In uiew of tte aboue discussion tle findings in regard to the Tenancg Act appliu.ble rn thes case are discussed here under. Wltctlvr the Petitionerc are decluted us Prclected Tenant ouer the lands cla;imed bu them. The Petitiarers SL/Vo.7, 3, 5, 6, 72, 13 and 2O to 3O tncludirrg th.eir Predecessors in inlerest lwue been ualidly declared as Protected. Tenarll"s over Ac. 157.03 gls couered bg 5y.No.37,40,42 to 47 and 5I to 53 of Gachibou.tli village and remaining petitioners ltave not been declared as Protect Tenants on the said land under tle prouisions of the section 37-A of Tenancg Ad. a', t7 CVBR,J CRP'No.5279120 l6 & Batch u,hichoroeedirws. There u)as a ualid surender ouer ecli.rc gb -rnea Og Sy.No-37,40,42,43 and 47 in fawur of SmL Lingoruna. the-then pdtdar in pursuonce of compromise rn A.S.IVo.2S of 1958'before tle l{on'ble High Arurt. Also tlwt the land couered by 5y.No.35,36 and. SO.arefreefumtle protected tenancy U/ s. 37-A Tenancg Act of 195O. I Wlrcther the 38-E patta certiftutes issued bu the Revenue Diui,sionOffier in G/ 1188/ 1993 dt 25.04.1995 for an Area Ac.73.O3 ats ouq Su.No. 37. 4C,,42.43.44 and 45 to Khanamet Balaiah and Otle.rs is u;alid. and Subsrstina. The Hon'ble High Court in CRP.No-67O8/2OO3 dt.25.02.2o1'3 tEld that tfui grant of certificates of ownership II/s. 38-E oJ Tenanq Acf, .on 25.04.1995 by the Reuenue Diuisional OIfren Cleuella Diaision in respect of Sy.No.37, 40, 42, 43, 44, and 45 total erteil Ac.7$.O3.Qts of Gachibowli wllage which from (par7 of tle lafid .sutrchdefed bg M/ s.Kastopa Corporation to the State) is witltout juriSaA*ion" null and. wiC, consequently Proeeding of RDO, Clevello Division qanthg ertificate of ownership U/ 5.38-E on 25.04.1995 are nbt sdbsist@ and. the cerTificate holders hque no ualid ights or title. Tfui Validitu of "588" sate deeds exea.tted bu Mts Ka,stpoadroordion i ; Tlc sales execttterl by M/ s Kastopa Corporation and others intaiour of 586r prots includrrtg tlrc members of tlrc Diamond Hills s.ociety'are in viol,ztion of S 3O(l). 38-D and 38fl of tLrc Ternncg Ad, 7950, and lqne tho:;e haue no effect on the ownership righils of tenants onfemzdonthem under tertancg lctut. Tlrc aint of theJtqntioners for 38-E cefi . It ts orderecl tltat subject fo submissron oltsuccession ptoedittg U/s.40 of ttrc Tenancy Act, t950, where euer necessary. Tlu dlaimfor isane of 38-t) certificatt: tutll be tssued for Ac.42.24'gts or Ac,42.6O ents ouer Sy.llos.Sl. 52 ancl part of 53 of Gachibowli village to tlre petitionerc at SI.N,r. I,3,5,6,I 2.13, curcl 2O to 3O. Tluz claim cl tlu: rentaining petitioners is rejected as tley luve not adducecl erty e:utdertce or docanrcnts to establish their dahn- Houteuer M/s.Kastolto Coryoratiorr is not entitled to claim infufite, to eEtivalent land frorn tlrc qou<,rnrrtent as the land alreadg declarcd a,s Stttphts and ueste:d hr Gouernnte:nt for retention as tLE said fitm lta.s alreadg const?tle(l ctrvl expressed no objection for issuante, of saLe efiifiute in fauour of eligiltlct Protected Tenants. Claint of M/ s Kctstopa Comorotion for Ac. I7.OO qts in Su, No.SO. lt i:; ordered that tlrc land couered. by Sg.No.SO ertent Ac l7.0ogls is neithr:r couered by Tenancy nor declared/ Surrendered as Ceiling &r4plus. t''- '' 'tt' t8 cvB&J CRP No.5279l20 I 6 & Batch {^) Tlwefore tle M/ s. Kastopa cotporation is entitld. to hold. tle .tand esdent Ac.l7.OO gts uuered bg Sg.No.SO of GacldboutV Vg. r wetler G-o.Ms.No.183 MA & uD Department dated z4.s.gooa issued under tle urban Areas (tuuetopment) Ad,, l97s notifging the ahjet londs as Residentiat hne takes awag the jurisdidin o1 auuuaties under the Tenanrcy Act in light of &c.lO2(e) of Tutancg AcL Findina: Tle tenancg ights of the petitioners are rehting to tte gear l95o oruaards beenuse of the possession oter the said lantts as tenants. Tlrcrefore, existing uested ights of the petitbnerc ober tle land in sy.ivos.Sl, 52 & 53 part would rwt be diuested bg ttte G.o.itls.No. 1g3 n{Aa uD Dept. daled: 24.3.2o00. As such ffu's rlssue is tgld. in fapour of petitioners. Additional Issue fd: whether the report of the Reuenue Djuisionat offuer cheuella dated: 27.07.1981 ho,s ang vahrc and uhetler saa oytaat is anferred ang jurisdiction to determine utla i"s tlg ptotected. {enant in light of Rule 14 rea.d. utith Rule 26 of tte Hgderabad. Tertancg and. Agrianltural Lands Act, 1950? Findinas: The report of the Reuenue Diuisional olfi@r, dde* 2z.7.1ggl _been upheld by the Hon'ble High court in w.p.No.4os9 of 19g2 and. anfi.nned in w-A.No.ta2o of 1987. No appeat is fi.dd. agailv.st tus W,A No 1a2O of 1987 and the same has beume fir-t o, no appeat in w.A.No.1a2o of 1987 was fited bg the Gouernm.ent and. *r,se firtlings of the Hon'ble Diuision Bench are binding on tle Gouemm.ent. Nout tleie issues cannot be questrorted or reopened at this junctttre- Addl. Issue No.(c): whether the Respondents in c.R.p.No.6To8/2o03 haue the locus standi to contest tlrc application of tle petitioners herein for grant of sale certificate tJ/ s 38 E or 38-A of tlte Tenancg Act or theg iag onlg approach tLe ciuil Courts or other appropriate forum to unuas their rights, if any, in the propettg purchased by them. Findinq: The Respondents No.8 to 72 in c. R.p. No. 6208/2oo3 and batch are strangers and purchasers of plots and tleg h.ave ra right or loans standi against the Protected tenants and the legal leirs of the proted,ed. tenants. As such theg cannot contest the application of the petitioners for grant of Ceniftcate of outnershrp Il/ s.38E or u/ s.38A of tle Tenarrcy Act. Tlrcrefore the cause of actton teft to tte Respondents No.8 to z2 in c-R.p No 67o8/ 2oo3 and bqtch ts to knock the doors of the ciuil c;ourt to oarrucrss their riglils, tf uny. rhis issue also decided in Jannur of the petitioners and actainst the Respondents No.8 to Z2 in GR.p. IVo. 5708/ 2003 and batclt and Re.spondent No.13. Addl.Issue No.(d: Whether the orders datd.: 9.12.1925 of tte land Reforms Tribunal deterntining the holding of the declaront M/s Kastopa corporation which has atta.ined finality ertinguist'es the rights of the Petitioners in C. R. P. No. 67O8/ 2OO3, if any, under tle Tenanq Act? qnd. a, t9 . cvB&J CRP No-5279/2016 & Barch le) [f the Petitioners in C.R.P.No.67O8/ 2003 are Iannd. eititld Oumership <brfiftate U/ s.388 of Tetuncy Act utuA hEt rplr/s to purclose U/ s.38 cr 38-A ofthe said Ad get exhausted? . !\ndino: (a) In vieu, of the aboue fndings of the Hon'ble High C-ouft and d;ecision of tlE Gouemrnent dated: 19. 1 0. 1994 the petitbners herein uho are the petitioners in C.R.P-No-67O8/2OO3 arc entitled Ounersfiip C:enifr@te U/ s.38-E ol the Tenancg Act for an ed of Ac.42.24 guntas a.s disanssed aboue otEr the land. in Sur.rey ffos. 51 to 53 part uhich &mteg numbers never sunendered U/s 19 as per tle rcards of Gachibotlli dVage origina g held by llyas Bumi Patta.dar now being dahned bg Ws Kastopa Corporo:tion and as srch the Wtitioners ,SLIlIos.I, 3, 5, 6, 12, 13 and 2O to 3O in C.R.P.No.67O8/ 20O3 ate entitldfor is e of &ttifrete of Ownership U/s 388 of Tenancy Aca but tat *le @nifiate U/s 38A oI n nancy Ad as hew aborc. 'fhe tEsted. lenancg righrs of the pred@ssrs of pditbner to Etestion the lrregular orders issued under the Land Refoms Ad is not slut under ahz lau. Their ight shall antinue to qliestion ,le it,,,,n@t order as such th,"- righ, of tenancv preuails ouer the orders pasd. under Ceiling Ad. Ad.dl-lsile_N9Jfl: ls it permissible in lau to grant a Joint Certifiule either U/ s.38E or U/ s 38-A of the Tenarng Ad. lo seteral persons claiming to be Pn tec,ed. tenants? Flrliry: There is no prohibition in lau ta issue o/ Joint Ounership Cetifiate U/s 38E of Tenancg Act ao futef;td tf,na:nts and their legal hars uho are the petitioners Sl.I\ro. I,3,5,6,12,13 and 2O to 30 herein, duiy following the procEdure lormulared thereiL l&idl. Issue No.ol: Whether the sale dds rclied upon bg tfe res,oondents 8-72 in CRP No- 6708/20O3 are uiolatite of S. 38-D of the Act and if so, utBther the sale deeds are wid ?llElllpsIs/ n,linos; Ifus issue is already been ansuered. at issue No.4 Ionrullated bg ,1on'ble Apex Court in C.A.No.3054/ 2006 at Paru No.32 of this order B1t tte aboue orders, this autlariay ll0.s metianlously restricted its pou'ers to decide the issue as framed. bg tle Hon'ble HUh C.ourt and Hon'ble Stpreme Court and passed orders hoAW that the Ntitioner llvough lheir predece.ssors dre hauing protected lenancy rights in resped of lctnds Ac.42.24 gts out o/ Sy.IVos.Sl, 52&53part. Further, in uieut of ahe,rtndings of tte Hon'ble High Court in its order dt 25.02.2013 at para 95(l,t the land adnteasuring Ac.137.16 gas. in resped of Sg.Nos.35-37, 40, 42-47 and 53 paft of Oachibottli uillage, &rilingampa g Mandal, since alread.y been vested with the Aout, tthbh attained finaliA the petitioner are precluded frorn claiming any righl over tle said lands- Tlt? clai n and objectiots jiled bg the other respondents herein is rejecled- Houever, if ttrcg are so ad.vised, alwy mag f e civil suit in convrete nl ci uil cou tl. As ted at para 18 lssue relating to CC.No.264/w/ 1975, dec)arations fiLed bg M/ s. Kostopa Coryoration in respect of land.s of Ac.I9O.17 gts out o/ Si1 lVos. 35.37, 40, 42 to 47 and 50 to 53 of Gachibou.tli village, -... n..J 20 CVBR"J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch !! *rilingampallg Mardal would be dealt qaratelg on lantd. Refoqns asprut and. tluts tlw enquiry on sard issue is defared" . . , .

13. Assailing the order dated 15.10.2013 pdssed by the RDO, the respondents in these Revisions filed appeats vide Case .: No.F2/54 08/2O13 and batch under Section 9O of the Tenancy Act on the file of Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District (Appellate Authority), and the same were allowed uide contrrron otder dated

24.O9.2OL6 by setting aside the orders of the RDO, wtrerein it was observed as follows a) Whetlwr G.O.Ms.No.183. MA dt.24.3.2OOO issed lotdq.tne e.p. IJrban Areas (Deuelopntent) Act, 1975 notifgirlg tle stbftd'lattd.s as "residential use" zone takes away the jurisdiction of the antlotitieunder tle Tenancg Act in the light of 5.102(e) of tleTenanq Ad? At the outset, it is useful b ertract the relevant provisiotls o! tlte A.P (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural lands Ad,, 1950. Sec.2 0 of the A.P.(Tetangana Area )Tenancg and Agrianltur.al lands Ad,, 1950. defines agncultttral land'as under- Sec.2(j) "Larrcl" rneans ttqicultural lond uhether atienaled. o, ir-ti"*"A and include lancl ttserl for purposes subseruient to agriantAtat and all benefits ansurq out rtf suclt land and things tlereon attachd. to tte eortl\ or perrnanentlq fasterrccl to angthing attach.ed to tle earth- *ction t02 of the -sarri Act cleals with cerTain land.s atd. arr;as, to uthich tte proutstorrs o/ Iarrd-s A.P. (TA) Agricultural Tenancg Act, 1950 houe no application. T'tte relarrtrrt portiort of Section 102 i.e. l*rltion 1O2 (e) reads as under: (a).... (b).... (c)..-. (d).... (e) to anq area u,luclt Gouenwrcnt tnuA, from time to tim.e, bg twtifimtion in the (Offictal Gazette) specrfu as being reserued for utbaq non- ag ricu ltu ra I o r i n t lu st nal de. uelop ment.

4.... @)... 2t CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch Itisclr,a|fromthea,bueprovisioytrytheprouisionsofAP.(lelangarn ,lili r*rlrrrq cird AgriAturat l!'tds Act, 1950 are appliuble to tle tand^s uthich we maiiy ud. and resend. for agriatla!.re.purpose- Tlrc ;,bi"", i-rt* Aa apbears to -be th?t the caltiuable rights of tle i":rr"*t"ip*tected. t irint" otter the ogictttturot lands are only protected trndertllesaidAd'.TtEprouisionsolttesaidTenancyActwillnotbe to the lantd,s, ofier its qnuersion from 'agric,lture' to 'non "ii"airrg c,grianlture'. ,tte Gotemment notified. tle sbiect tands herein for 'Residential use' bg ir"d"g C.o. ,.s. ivoltag MA di24.32ooo under tte A.P. Urban Areas ()euelopment) Ad, 1 97 5. In vieu of tle said. notifiatiot\ tte subiect lands cease to be'agrianltural kmds' within tle meinfuq of tle A.P.(lelangana Area) Tenancy and Agriantfiral Lands Act, 1950- cbnsequentlg, tle Tribunots/Autlarities under the Act would cease to haue jurisdiction ouer the'atbiect lands' Therefore, tle findings of tle RDO, Raiendranagar Diuision that ncttfiinttin issuJd uri", C-O.ltt".iVr.183 MA & UD Dept dt-24'O3-20O0 u,oitd rwt diuest the subsisfing uested tte rights of tenants is not correct a,Ld awrdinglg set aside. b) Wtetler lle report of RDO dt.27.7.1981 hns ang value ? and whetlrcr ti,e said. o!ficial * ailenea ang iurisdiction to detennine uho is tle prcteted. iinant in the. light of rub t1 r/w Rute 26 of the Hyderabad Tmatrcy and. Agria.tltural La nd. F.lJes, 1 950? fi,e Hon'.ble Highc;ourtinits order dt.17-o2-1981 in W.P.No.459O/ 1980, directed ttd the enqrtiry shall be made bg the District Collector, Hyderabad" or ang suCn other Olfier @s maY be designated by him' not beltow tle rank oY nerrenue Diuisiornt Olficer to ascertain whether tle pcttitioners (in tle-said. utrit petition) were declared as protected tenants of ihe land.s mnrerned inctudirq Sy. IVos.46 & 47? and if so, under what provision and'when? and did tle petitioners or ana of them or their 'prederessors in interest stnender their tenancy righls according to law, -and. if so, which of them" utlen and. in uhich proceedings? &tid erquiry offier was directed to omplete the enqurry withitt 4 nrcnths from the dite iltto reeipt of the order and tle impJententation of tle G-O 'Rt. No.594 will depend upon the said reporT of the Distnct Collector or tlrc OJ.ficer designated bg him as tle case may be' The District colld,or, Hgderabad in turn, designated the RDO. Clrcuellct Diuision to anduct on enqtiry. Thus, tle authoritg of RDO, Chevella Diuision to conduct on enquiry lws deriued from the judgment of tle Hon'ble High court in w.P No.4SgO/ IqBO: Tle job of RDO, Ctevetla Dvision is limitecl to the: issues or<lained by tle Hon'ble High Court in rts saidTudgmenl' The en4tiry anducted bg tte enqtiry oJficer (Ram Reddy) ruas rutt ht tlrc cqtacita as a Tribunat or ang Auttarity under the prouistons of A.P.(felangana Area) Tenanrcg and Agicttltural Lo.nds AcL 195O or the Rules framed there under. The report of tte RDO, Cheuella Diuision dt.27- 07-1981, which is submitted pursuant to the directions of the flon'ble Hi11h Court in W.P No.459O/ 1980, is of the value of rnerelg u pte<:e of 22 cvB&J CRP No.52792016 & Batch t) euidene for the purpose of a.sertainirq tlv ngfus of tlu parties, but not as strrfifiory ord.er passed bC a stafirtory atfilaritg yndqr tni a.A nn report of the enquiry olfirer (Ram Reddg) ts beryfi of ang stdutory sanction. In the tiglt of the aboue, it cannot be soid. that the RDO, Cletrctla Diuision is anferred with jurisdietion to determine, ula is protded tenatnt under Rules 14 and 26 of Hyderabad Tenancg and Agriatltural Lond. Rules, 1950. The findings of tlrc Authoitg belout on tle sard rlssue is inonat and. acardinglg set asi.d.e. c) Whether respondents in CRP.No.67O8/2003 lw)e the toans stottdi tn untest the application of tlrc petitioners tlatein for grant of *k certificnte u/ s.38-E or 38-A of tlrc Terwncy Ad or thq mag onlg approach tle ciuil court or other appropriale fotum to unuass their r@hfs, if ang, in The Respondents No.2 to 78 in CRP No.67O8/20O3 e;lainpn to houe purcho.sed. tlrc land in sy.no.Sl to 53 through regd sale deels jointlg exeanted by both tlw land holders Kastopa Corpomtion andtheprcteded tenants namelg. M/ s Kastopa Corporation and Prctedd. Tenanis h,auing tfuts alienated the land approached tle RDO, Cheuelta Diuisionfor grant of sales ecrtificate under/ section 38-A of tle Tenancg Act, 1950 tn respect of the same lands. *ction 99 of the Tenancy Act, I95O deals withtlebaroftlrc juri,iliction of the Ciuil Court. The said prouisions of the Srrf;ian 99 of tle Act is efi.rocted below "99. Bar of jurisdiction I ) Saue as provided in this Act no Ciutl @urt shall lwve jurisdiction to settle, decide or deal with ang question wlrjchis b3 or under this Act requtred to be settled, decided or dqlt utith bg the Talsilda4 Tribunal or Collector or by tle Board of Retre:iue or Gouernment. (2) No orcler of the Tahsilciar, Tibunat or Collector or of the fuafi. of Reuenue or Gouernment made under this Act, slta,ll be ryestiortd.in ang Ciuil or Criminal Court '. Tle question as to wheth<:r the protected tenants are entttled for grant of sales certtficate u/s 38-E or -secfion 38-A of the Tenancg Ad,, 1950 exclusiuely folls uitltut tlrc Ttnsdrction of ttrc Tribunnl,s undcr the Ad. The Ciuil Courts haue no Ttnsdrctrort to determine such questbns, sine ciuil courT junsdicfiorr is e4tresslq baned under section 9O of tte AcL Tle petitioners, beutgl 5rrc'6e55er-in-interest of the land. lalders, haue every ight to question the qrari of sales certiJicate t:ssued unfur sedian 38-E or 38-A of the Tetancq Act, 1950 in fawur of the pgtitioners. Howeuer, in the giuen case, the subject lands are notified for 'residentiaJ use' by G.O. Ms.No.l8O MA dt.24-03-2OOO under tle Urbon Areas (Deuelopment) Act, 1975. As such, the subiecl lartds are no tore gouerned bg the provisions of the Tenancg Act, 1950. In the giuen ircumsfances, Ciuil Court. would be the apprcpriatcforumfor the respondents to get their righl adludicated qua subject land.s. 23 CVBR.J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch '.W firtdings of tle RDo., Cleuello Dtui.sion thnt the respondents the,rein und petitioners hsein, orc strangers tn the atbjed. tand"s and haue no iglt or loats:standi agahst tle prctdet tenants or tteir.legal leirs i"s rot ord, amdhgtg siefttding is sef aside. ct) Wether tle order dL9.12.I975 of the LRT determining the holding of t,\e dedatant t[/s. Kagapc@rporation which ha.s attained finality erthguishes ttui'i@hti of the petitbners in CRP.No.67O8/2OO3, if any, under the Tenancg Ad ?' This i'ssue llcs to fu qomined.in the lighr of the proceedings of the Land Reforms Tribunal" Hgdapbad (West), tdok plarc in CC No.264/W/ 75, to u,hichthe petitioners bwme parties bg frling objection petitions. A.fte r M / s, Kastopia &rporutio.n filed.' declaratio n b efo re the Land R efo rm.s Tiibunol" Hgdera.bad. (Wes;t) declaring its twlding of Ac.l9O-17 gts. in Sy.iVo.35 to 37, 40, 42 to 46 & 50 to 53 of Gachi Bowli uillage vide CC No.264/W75, the RD0., Hgaerubad. (West) publisted prouisional tist of Protedd Tenants ewle for ounerships righrs u/5.38-E of AP (TA) Tenartq Ad, 1950 nannclg Klutnmet Balaiah Gadda Mysaialy M,znilanda Kondaiahattd. others in respect of Sy.No.37, 40, 42 to 47 o.nd 51 to 53. Wlen tfu flid provisional lust uras transferred to the Land Re,forms ftihnol, Hgdcrubad West for necessary action, M/ s.Kastopa Qa'rporation @ objedjiotts tp tle said provisional list. The protected tenanl,s Khananet mUiah Gadda Mgsaial4 Manikonda Kondaiqh and otlets also fiIed daim pdition before tle tand Refomts Tribunal, Hgderabad (West) for isatrrtrg of Outnership CerTificates u/ 5.38-E of the Tenonty Ad, 1950.' Duirtg tle sard proceed.ings, M/s.Kastopa C-orporation and Protdpn Tenant's ftled compromise petitiort otr 3O-O5- 1975- Tl@ Ptotdd. Tenants unitted tleir Tenancy Rigltts ouer tlte lctnd adlneasuring ac. 757.O3.9ts. iru59.No.37,40,42 to 47 and 5I to 5J of GachiBowli Wlage and. plcailed..ltor drsmissal of thetr claun petitron. ln view of the said amptomise, tle Addl. Reuenue Dtutsrortal Officer-cunt- Lantd Reforms *ibwal, Hgderabad West passed orclers ort 31 05 1975 in LRW47/75 ttoldirtg thilt the nflmes of oll tlte prok:ctecl tenettts taere round.ed off from t @ final tenancg register of l95O a.nd ctll tle protectecl tenants have sutterldcre.d tlair tenancg rights dunrtq the ge'ar l9(t5 ctrtd 19t;6 and tle sne lu,s been acrepted by tlrc l'alstlclar 'l'\rc l.and Retcrms'IYibwrul, Hgderabad Wesf dismissed lhe petttiorr filecl btt Gctdde My:;aiah and othets for granf of ownership certificate uncl<,r Sc:<:.-i8-E o/ the Tenanq Act. Cbn*qtentlg, the Land Refonns 7'nlrurrctl, f{ytlerabad We:;t orderd. for deldioi of tfu nartes of protectecl te,r(rn[.s publisled it the provisiowl.list ond dhded. for issuance of "ntl' finol hst rtruler Rule- +(3) of 38-E Rufes. llhe said orders of tle Land ReJbrnrs 'l'nbuno-I, H g a' erab ad (Wesl bwme fual. The Land Refotms Ttibunal, Hgderabad (West), b-r7 rts <trder dt ()9'12- 1975 inCC No.264/W75, d.eclorcd M/s. Kastopa (torporatton n-s srrrpftr-s holder by 2.2862 SH (fiondord Holdings) i.e. Ac.l37 17 gts. l'tr a1tpe:al LRA No.lO/1976fild.b9 W.s. KastopaCoryoration ooarn.sl tle orcl<'rs of the Land Reforms T?ibunal passrud in CC No.264/ W/ 75 was r/r.srrrr.ssecl on 6.4.1976. & al.so, tle Revision Petition uide CRI' (SRl No.24698/ 1976 filed by M/ s Ka,stopa @rynration against the orders rn I.RA NO. I ()/ 1976 u.,as dismissed bg the Hon'bte High Court on 28-O4-1976. No furtlrcr appeal uas qnied. against the same. Thus, the orcle:rs pas-secl lty tlrc Lanct. Reforms Tributwl, Hgderabad West de:cl<tnrrc1 lvl/ s. Kastolta 24 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Barch Ci hrporution. as holding eress of 2.2862 SH ,ras bmme ftwl. TIE Prcteabn Tenanti also did rct agitafe against tle said. ordets of Land Y:Xtr:*;:f:Ttri stnender Aer3z-l, r,,,rtand in Sg.lVos.35 to 37, 40, 42 to 47 A $ Part) towards sutpfus holding of 2.2862 SH. Notie in fonn No.WII under Sub-rule (4) of Rule 7 of tlrc Rules framed under the Ceiling Act was r'ssued on 4.9.1976 ulling for objections on tle surrender olfered by the declarant. This notie, uas publisled as rquired under the Rules but ra objedions were fibd. On 6.10.1976, tle Lond Reforms T?ibunal, Hyderabad. West passed. orders U/5.1O(3) of tle CeilinE Act approvirq tle surrender proposed bg Kastopa Cotporation. On 13.10.1976, possession of tle surrende,red land to the ertent of Ac.137.17 Gts wa.s talcen ornr bg the Reuenue htspector, Lingarnpalli bg conducting due patrchananna. On 24.1.1978, a notie U/Rtle 12(2) was r;ssued stating that tle land.s mentiond. therein haue uested in the &afe U/5.11 of the A.P. Land Reforms (AAry Ad, 1973 and inuited dlaims for ampensation in reqect of the sunendered land. Tle said notie utas published in the A.P. Gazette on 11.5.1989. None of the allqed proted,ed tenants filed ang ctaim petitions. In April, 1978, rotie rls.16 of the A.P- Land. Reforms (@AH) Act, 1973 uras issued stating tlut the Land Reform.s Tribunal i.s proposing to detennine the amount payable for the l.and.s sunenderd. u/s.15 of the said. Act and inuiting all persons luuing ang interest in tte lands to appeal and make pleas for determination of tle annount and addue euid.ene in that belulf. At thi.s stage also, protected tenants haue rctflled ang claim.s. In uiew of tlte said. prceedings of the Land Reforms Tribunal, Hgderabad West Diuision, the lond o.dmeasuring Ac.I37-17 cents in Sy. IVo.35 to 37, 40, 42 to 27 and 53 (part) of Gachibowli village remained absolutely uested in tle Stale and tle State is in possession of the said ertent of the propertg. Therefore, the righls of the petitioners, if anA, in subject lands, remained ertinguislled. Tte petitiorters, bg their anduct, are estopped to re-agitate for the ights, uthich ttog hod.forgone,. Tle findings of tle lawer Court Autltoritg tltat the tenancg rights of the predaessors of the petitioner are not shut under tle law and their rights of the tenancg prevails ouer the Ceiling Act is totallg incorrect, arcordinglg tlrc saidfindings are set o.side. e) If the petitioners in CRP.No.67O8/ 2OO3 are found. entitled to ownership certifiate u/s.38-E of the Tenancg Act, would their right to purchase u/ s.38 or 38-A of the said Act get exhausted? The scope of Sedion 38-A & &ction 38-E are qtite different as drscrzssed lerein aboue. In cns of application of Section 38-E of the Tena.rrcy Act, ownership rights in the lottds tetd bU tfu prcteded tenants would be transferred bg the operation of law with effected from the notiJied date, providd. the requirement of kc-38(7) of the Tenancg Act, 1950 are *tisfted. Wereas in ca.se of Sale Certificate to be issued u/sec 38-A of the Tenancy Act, 1950, it is nof necessary that the requirement of Ser,"38(7) shall be satisfied. The transfer of the land u/ s 38-A is in the nature of piuate sale, wten either the land. holder or the protect tenant or both applu to the Tibunal for issl.tane of fuks Certificate based on agreement. e 25 CVBR.J CRP No.527912016 & Batch inreq$oftlv Sanelandu/s 38-A of tlrc Act. lT.erefoie, tle ptovisiotls of serlion 38-E and. 38-A do not go togetler and. i1? the ownets@ trghts arc dansfard u/section 38-8, no sale certifieate couldbe ft, Is it pemissible in laut to grant of a joint efttfimte eitlrcr u/ s.38-E or S:38- A of tle Tenonq Ad, to ser,eral persons claiming to be protected |a:nants? There is no prohibition,utdstte Actforr'ssuanoe of Joint cerTificate under sr;ctton 38-E or Under sedion 38-A in fawur of several persons claiming to be prctdd. tenanls, providd tlw requirement of respectiue prouisions are satisfted g) Whetter tle salc dceds relied upon bg tte respond.enls 8-72 in CRP No.67O8/20O3 ote aiolAtive of 5.38-D of the Act and if so, whether tle scde deeds are wid? In tle ghten a,*, it is rto,t that tle tand lnlder alienated the lands on thgir oun tnfatour of the reslnndent-8 to 72 in CRP No.67O8/ 2003. The alileged fclnslnts Le. rcqnndents lerein are parTies to the regd- sale deeds exmied in favanr of tle prospectiue purcttasers. Ttereby, the re:;pondents'(petitioners)thaue waiued tleir rights auailable u/ sec 3B-D of tl'uz Tenanry Ad,, 7950. Therefore, it qnnot fu said ttat the regd. sale deeds jointlg executed by tfui lqtd.ltolders orld,tle ailegd tenants in fawur of respondent-8 to 72 in CRF NO.67N/2OO3 are wid as viotatiue of sectiort 38-D of the Tetuntcy Ad, 795O. Hen@, tlefirdings of tle Louter Court Autlwnty that the sale d.eeds are wiC is ViolatiUe of SerIion 38-D of the Tenancg Act, is not correct. Ara;wer to the isanes no.7 b 4. 6. 9 and IO fonnulated bu the l{on'ble Supreme @urt of Indiainciuil apoeal No.3O54/2O06. I. Whetler the respondents or their predecessors we:re, at any stage, rcarded o,s ptotded tenants in respect of land neasuring Ac.19O Aqes 17 gts, situated in Sy. IVos.35, 36, 37. 40, 42-47, 50-53 of fuchibowli Villoge, &ilingampallq ManclaL Ranga Reddg Distrid,, Elgderahad or anA portion thereo,f?

2. Wetler tlo findings rearded. bg the RDO n ltts enqtttry report dt: 27-O7- 1981 in respefr of (a) the statrrs of respondents as protectd. tananls under 5.37-A and (b) nb-serrce of proof of sunend.er in omrdane uith 5.19 of the A<'t, tuert cttallenged by M/s. Kastopa &ryoration? If not whether tlrc satcl firrd-rrtgs can be clullenged bg tle suc@ssors in interest of lr'li s Kctstopa Cotporation? .i. ln co.se, questiotts No.l and 2 aboue, eft] en.sl{,(lr<,d tn the affirmatiue, utletler tte respondents or tlptr prerlece-ssors had ualidly stnendered their tenancg rights itr rt<:cordcutce: with the produre pressibed by laut. If so, irt wlLiclt pr<tcee:clurgs and qua whichsarueg rulmbers, utos the sucender ntade .) Issues No.I ta 3 are interannected, as such riiscusserl toge.ther. As per tle tenanq recards, tlrc no.mes of respondent's predecessor utere rearded as protected terrctfis ur r<tspect of Sy. _. __.._.._t._ - 26 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch (l No.37, 40; 42, 43 &.47, of uhich SmL Lingamma was the Iandholden Houeuer, oll tle.protectd tenanls ltor.c surrqtdeted their fr iigttts infauanr of Lilgaffmo and the same wds arepted bg tle Talsildar d s 79 of tle Tenarrcg Act, 1950. &tbsqrrcnllg, uhen tle Rx/C., Cherrclla Diuision published. prciisional list of ptotdcd terwnts etigible for ownership rights u/s. 3&E of Tenoncg Aq 1950, namelg Kanammet Balaiah & others (Raspondents) in reqerlt of Sg.No.37, 40, 42 to 47 and 51 to 53 held. bg Pattedar llias &nni ard the list was transfened to the Land. Refomc Ttihmd Hyderabad(west) for necessary actio4 said l{aruumet fulaiah and other entered into compromise and bg wafuing tle tenattq r@hfs ouer the land adm.easuring 4e157-OS gts in the $oresaid. Sy. iVos, pleoded for dismissal of tleir doim petition filed. for issuance of 38-E certificate. Consquentlu, the Land Reform"s Tlibuno| Hgderabad (West) orderd. for deletion of the nan.es of the protected tenqnts publislvd in tla provisional list and directed for issuance of 'Nil' finnl list under Rule I p) of tle 38-E Rules, which became final. Thereforc, tte dubjed lands utere not held bg any protected tenont cr,s on tlv dafe of rcstirtg of the property in the State under the prcvisbts of the A.P. Land Reforms (CoAH) Act, 1973. The fid.e t@k otrerpossession of Ac137-17 gts the land admeasuing dogs. the enryirg ofifi@ (.Sn Ram Reddy), in his enquiry report, noted thd Mdel. Tenants are rat in possession of the property and. lands arefnpossessionandcustody of the State. Tlerefore, tle firdings of tle RDO, Rajendranclgar Mandal that the responderfis arc lolding PT rigttls ouer the sublect lands are fafrtailg inrr red, as such, said findings of the autlwrity below are rejeded Tte isste is ansuterd awrdingly.

4. Wlether the sole of plots from the year 1986 onutar<ls lt!/ M/s.Ka,stopa C-orporation and the protected tenotfis rn fauottr of tlte appeltants and petitioners in the crrnce.nted SLPs are: t,ttltd having regard inter-alia to tle prouisions of tlrc Tenattcy A<:t ? Ansuerd abve.

6. Wtatler therc utas o.rutersion of tte land use for ltouse sife.s ortr,l non- agrianlfiiral putpo*s in respect of the londs irt rStesltort irt acard.ane with lout and. if so, what is the effe.ct oJ- sitclr anversion on tle fuFds of the porties and. front which date tuottkl the anuersion be eJfeAiue? Answerd ahove.

9. Hauing obtafutd a onsent order dated 20 09-1999 (Justice 4..S, Blntds ordcr) in W.P.No.147O8 of 1999 for grant of rigltts urrcler S. 38-A in resped of land. tn Sy. Nos.46, 47 and 53 (Paiki) to th<' ertent of 37 a*es, wlether the respondents could rrtutually agree: for issue of 38-A sale @rtificates qua land in Sy. 1Vos.5l, 52 attcl part 53 sold to the petitioners hereinfor ualuable considerattort? Answered oboue. 27 cvBR"J CRP No.5279D016 &Batoh .lO. Wnefter tle.respondenls are entidd. to ertificates lJs/38-A orrcr Sy. IVos.SI, 52 A $? Answered. above.' # L4. Irggrieved by the impugned common order dated 24.O9.2OL6 passed in Case No.F2/ 1g2/2OL4 and batch by the Appellate Authority/Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District, the tenants liled statutory revisions vide C.R.P.No.5279 of 2016 and batch on the frle of this Court. Writ Petition No.11157 of 2019 is also liled seeking similar relief. One of the tenants also frled Writ Petition No.6759 of 2OLT seeking to declare the inaction on the part of officials of GH.MC in remo,ring the illegal structures made by the unoflicial respondents inspite c'f issuance of notice No.27O2ITPS/C-Ll|WZ|GHMCl2Ot T as illegal and for other appropriate reliefs.

15. W.P.No.386O of 2OO8 is filed seeking to declare the exemption orders vide G.O.Ms.Nos.1816 dated 18.1O.20O5 and 2183 dated 27 -L2.2OO5 issued by the State Government in respect of the lands in Sy.Nos.3l>,36, 37,40,42,43,44,45,46,47 and 53 part of Gachibovrli Vi'llage as contrary to the observations rnade by the Hon'ble A.pex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.6O93 and 7013 of 20O6 and the status quo orders dated 08.09.2006 and for other appropriate reliefs.

16. As per the orders of Honble the Chief Justice, the Civil Revision l)etition No.5279 of 2016 & batch and Writ Petitions were 28 CVBR,J CRP No.5279/20t6 & Barch r\ clubbed together dhd liited bbfore this court for hearing. These matters have been heard on different dates and reserued for orders. The learned Senior Counsels appearing for the respective parties sought permission to place written submissions/reply submissions before this Court and the same were received by the Registry and the latest one being Lo.o4.2o25 i.e, before Summer Vacation, 2o2s.

17. Considered the srrbmissions of Mr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, Mr.E.Madan Mohan Rao, Mr.J.Prabhakar, Mr.E.Ajay Reddy, Mr.Harender Pershad, Mr.R.N.Hemendranath Reddy, Mr.B.Chandrasen Reddy, Mr.A.Venkatesh, Mr.K.R.prabhakar, learned Senior counsels; Mr.c.Hanumantha Rao, Mr.B.Venkata Rama Rao, Mr.s.sharath Kumar, Mr. Keerthi Kiran Kota, learned counsels along with their respective Advocates on rccord. SUBMISSTONS Otr'THE LEARIIEp COUNSEL rN SUppQgr oF THE OF I8. The learned Senior Counsel Mr. Harendcr [)crsirercl, ;rppeerring for the revision petitioners submitted that Lhe Spccial (lradt: I)epur5r collector/Revenue bivisional oflicer (RDo), bcing rrrc original Authorit5r under the Tenancy Act, 19so aftcr vcrifying the final tenancy register prepared under the provisions of rhe Act, categorically held that as per the records, the names of Khanamet Balaiah, Manikonda Kondaiah, Dharpally Bhabaiah ancl Ganjayi a 29 . cvB&J CRP No.5279l2Ol6 & Batch Narasa:iah were recorded as Protected Tenants IPTs) in respect of lands in Survey Nos.51,52, and 53, as well as other suwey numhrs. It is submitted that the original authority/RDo in his report observed that, fo,.lowing the amendrnent to STtion 37 of the fenancy Act vide Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Arnendment) Act, 1955, the said persons were declared Protected Tenants tlnder Section 37A of the 'l'enancy Act for lands admeasuring Ac.153.O7 gts in Survey Nos.37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47 ,51, 52, and 53, sittrated'at Gachibowli Village, )eeld by the pattadar Ilyas Burni. The names of the petitioners and their predecessors-in-interest were recorded'in the tenancy register prepared under Section 37A of the Tenancy Act in the year

1958. Ttre RDO was directed to submit a report regarding the nature and classilication of the subject lands in W.P.No.459O of tr98o, and accordinl3ly, the enquiry report dated 27.O7.1981 was submitted. The respondents, having failcd to challenge the enquiry report or its {indings are estopped lrom disputing the nature of lands or the tenancy rights of thc pctitioners. Tl're learned Senior Counsel further' submittert that thc lerndlords and alleged purchasers, in an attempt to bypas:i the manclatory requirements under Section 38D of the Tenancy Act, acknorvlcdgcd in their sale deeds that the lands were tenanted and rccognized the Protected Tenancy rights of the petitioners. It is furthcr submitted that the appellate authority without a,lvcrtirrg Lo thc statLlLory provisions and evidence placed on 30 cvB&J CRP No.5279l20t6 & Batch r\ record' erroneously reversed the orders dated ls.Io.2o13 pasged by the RDo. It is argued that since the predecessors oi ur. petitioners were recogniznd PTs under section 3zA for lands in survey Nos. 51, 52, and 53 (supported by the certified copy of the Tenancy Register filed in cRP No.5279 of 2016l, any sale deeds executed in violation of Section 38D are uoid. ab initio and non-esf in law. It is contended that the Tenancy Act was enacted to regulate the relationship between landlords and tenants and to protect the rights of tenants. Therefore, any alienation of land without following the procedure prescribed under Section 38D of the Tenancy Act is impermissible, particularly when the land is vested with ownership rights under Section 3gE of the Act and remains subject to the conditions and restrictions laid down under section 3s(7). Thus, sale deeds executed in favour o[ third parties in violation of these provisions arc void, non_est and nullity in law. The learned senior counsel emphasized that section 38D of the Tenancy Act requires a landholder inrending to sell tenanted land to issue a written notice to the F r, providing six months time to express willingness to purchase the lands. Any sale deed executed in a concealed manner, even if i.volving a few prs represen.tcd by allegcd power-of-attorneys, dr)cs not amount to compliance with section 3gD of the Tenancy Acr. It is submitted that there is no valid surrender under Section l9(1) of the Act and unless surrender is made in writing and admitted beforc the Tahsildar, oral .i- 3l CVBR,J CRP,No.5279l20 16 & Batch tenancy surrender is not permissible w.e.f. O4.O2.L954: The alleged surrender proceedings mentioned in Lr.No.W1 47 rci;NoLI and orders dated 31.05.1975 are not binding, nor do they constitute atay estopllel. The surrender proceedings refeqred to in File Nos.A:3/ 10805/64 dated 18.02.1965, A3l374g/75 dated 02.04.1965, and A,4/2556166 dated 16.10.L966, were the .basis. for qejecting Sectio:e 38E ownership claims. However, as per the 1958 tenanci/ register, the names of the PTs were recorde{ again which shows continuation of the tenancy and non-sulTender,,of tfue lands. tt is .. further submitted that even otherwise, the anegeq surer,rder in File No.A472556/66 was in respect of lands in Surv-ey Nos.37, 42, 43, and 44., totaling Ac.63.8O gts is not relating to the subject lands in Sy.Nos.S 1., 52, :rrrcl 53 (part). It is contended tha!,,a$ on the date of alleged surrencler, I-ingamma had already alienated t[e land in favour of Ilyas Bur-ni irnci thc Lirrgermma has lost all her rights a.s pattadar in view of executron o{' sale dced dated 22.04.1940. The orders dated

31.05.1975 ignor<'cl thc clistinction between surrender Under Section 34 and rights rrrrclcr Section 37 137A. Surrender under Section 34 cannot be dccmccl to bc sltrrender of PI rights under Section 37A without spccilrc rc:lc:rcncc. tt is further contended. t]rat as on the notilied datc i.c, O l O l .1973, Section 38E had the effect of statutorily transferrinfl o\rrrrcrstrip to the tenants. Once such transfer takes place by virtue of thc stz-rtutc itself, there are no tenancy rights left to I I 32 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch o surrender. Hince, the alleged compromise dated 3l.os.I9z5 is non- est and hit by section 33 of the Tenancy -Act. with respect to G.o.Ms.No.183 MA & uD dated 24.o3.2ooo issued under the Urban Areas (Development) Act, Lgzs, it was argued that unless a notification is issued under Section 102(e) of ttre Tenancy Act, the land continues to be governed by the Tenancy Act, and inclusion of the same within the municipal limits does not change its character of agricultural use. The learned senior counsel submitted that petitioners are entitled for issuance of ownership certificates under section 38E, as they qualify as prs under section 37A as on the date when the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural tands (Amendment) Act, 1955 (for short "Amendment Act, 19s5") came into force. It is further submitted that at the time of filing a declaration under the coAH Act, 1973, the landlord Kastopa corporation possessed Ac.l9o.l7 gts, excecding borh slandard and family holdings as prescribed. Therefore, rhe land held by the petitioners as pls must be excluded under section 13 of the coAH Act. placing reliance on section 4 of the coAH Acr, ir is srated that the ceiling for a family unit of up to five members is one standard holding. Thus the computation o-[ twp.holdings in favor"rr r-r[ Kastopa Corporation under Section 3S(Zl of the Tenancy Act is erroneous and illegal. It is contended that the consent order in w.P.No. L47oB of 1999 dated 20.og.Lggg, regarding issuance of certificates under Scction 3gA for lands in sy.Nos.5l, s2, ('- ) 33 cw&r CRP No.527912016 & Batch and S3(part), does not bar issuance of 388 certificates. Section 38A specifically relaxes the restrictions under Section 38(7) and permits sale cf entire land. The Tenar.lcy Act also recognizes joint tenancy rights;, and denying certilicates under Sections 38E/38A solely on the grourLd of joint cultivation contradicts the intention of the legislature and clefeat the purpose of enactment. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that the enquiry report dated 27.07.1981, relied and approued in W.A. No.l42O of 1987 is bind.ing and the same cannot be revisited in revision proceedings. It is pointed out that the impugned ordervvas passed on 24.09.2016 despite the appellate arrthority being on le'ave (G.O.Rt.No.2079 GAD Spl.O.A. Department, dated

20.09.2016), which raises serious doubt with regard to its validiry. Even :rssuming that the tenants are not entitled to Section 38E certificates due to the landlord's holding, they remain tenants under law, ar:,d unless the propert5r was first offered to sale to t]re PIs under Sectior: 38D, the landlord cannot alienate the same to third parties. In support of above submissions, the learned Senior Counsel has placed reliance on the following decisions: Kirdn Singh and others us. Chama;n Paswan and otherst; Deaanotth Stngh us. Poosu Mallaiahz; Commissioner of Wealth- Tax as. B. Nathmol Vaid3; Sada as. Talr.s;ildar, Utnoora; Islannia Arabia College, Kurnool as. Mrs. Sho;nta Bais; Samo,.la Venka;iah rlress; r s:rR n7 'tsto1z1A.P,L.J 9t 3tggl scc ont-ine Mad 3l I oetn ltsttt A.p i7 =. r987 (2) A.p.r-.J 197 ttg88 scc cnlinc A.1,. 50: 1988 (2) Al-T 74 34 . CVBR,J CRP No.5279/2016 & Batch (') of lre os. Bakka Nagaiaha; Kota;lah us. Propertg Bdgltist Churches (Prhnte) Ltd.7; Allahahad Authorttg us. .l\Icsinr?.zdntan and Ors.E; antd. others us tlppart Muthamm.as; Manotl as. I)euraato; Duarlea Ptvrsa,d. Agaruai (D) Bg LR's and another as. BD Agerutal and othersll ; Ibrahtmgtatno;m Taluk Vgannsaga gqffie "futtgham os. I(suresh Red.dgtz' Mir Sardor Al7 as. *IalruIo;l'Reixhze Officer, Kesetz. Mandalrs; Ashok Legland vs. Sttzlfie of Tamtl Ngdu oN othersra; .l\Lsriniuasa Rao us. Special Courtls; Puslnrla Patel Cluntda as. MRO, Malkajgiri Mandal" Ranqa Reddg Dlsttfctl6; B.Bal Reddg us. Teegala Naragana Reddg'zj Sat{ag Shanna. vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.,ta; Ilindustan Ztnc Ltd. tls,. llmer Vidgrut Vltran /|{f'go,m Ltd.,1e; Thota Slrtdhar Reddli'tb. Manddla. Ralmula;mma2o and Oulf Oil Corpotu;tlott lrbrnted 8. State of Telangana2l.

19. Mr.E.Ajay Reddy, Iearned Senior CounSel' appearing for M/ s.Kastopa Corporation, submitted that M/ s. Kastopa'Corporation has purchased land admeasuring Ac.157-03 grlntas in S5r;Nos.g7, 40, 42 to 47, 5l., 52 and 53 situated at Gachiborrli Village, ' Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under reifstered sale deed dated O2.O9.1961 b<:aring document No.2SOO of 1961 from the legal heirs o[ L:rtc ili'as IJurni. Subsequently, the Kastopa : Corporation also Jrurchasccl lancl admeasuring Ac.33-14 guntas in otgtg ( t) A.P.l-.i l.lq '(tsas) 3 scc 424 t (tsso) 6 scc 42J 'tra1r; ALD 2l.l Itrsgs) r scc 6ls rrAIR2oo3 sc 2686 '2ool (t) scc 667 131zo0+;2ALD 516 (100-l) l rrt l' lrr rtArR 2ooa sc 2816 '51zooo14 scc 2 t4 tt20l0 SCCOnline nI' 7i.l (:0ll), rr Al.l {r()l "zor6(rs) scc r02 ttJudgment dated 10.Il l0lJ passcrJ in S L I'. ((' tn(2otg) t7 scc 8l 2o (zozt) r6 scc r 2'2022 SCC Onlinc SC It(,(' , ;, ) No. ii0/2017 by Hon'ble Supreme Court 35 CVB&J CRP No.5279 /20 I 6 & Batch Sy.Not;. 35, 36, and 50 under document No,498 of 1964 dated

28.09.1964 from the legal heirs of ta.te llyas Burni. Thus, the Kastopa Corporation became tlre absolute owner and possessor of total la.nd admeasuring Ac. lgO.L7 guntas..It is further submitted that before execution of the sale deeds, vendors obtained specific permission from the Tahsildar under Sections 47 and 48 of the Tenancy Act and thereafter the sale deeds were registered. In the Land Reforms Tribunal proceedings, it was conlirmed that Protected Tenants existed in respect of land admeasuring Ac.157-03 guntas in Sy.Nos.35,36,37,40,42 to 47,50, 5[, 52, and 53, but they surrenclered their tenancy rights under Section 19 of the Tenancy Act in the y'ear 1965. Out of the total land holding of Ac.19O- L7 guntas, an extent of Ac.59-24 guntas in Sy.Nos. 50, 51, 52, and 53 (Part) was declarecl as retainable land, and an extent of Ac.137-03 guntas in the remainirrg survey numbers was declared as surplus land, which was vested ir-r the Government. It is contended that although the Kastopa Corporalion owned Ac.19O-14 guntas oiland, in the LRT proceedings, the total extent was wrongly shown as Ac.196- l7 guntas, resulting in an exces,s of Ac.6-38 guntas wrongly calculated to the trolding of the declarant. The learned Senior Counsel further pointcd out that the Honble Division Bench of' this Court, vide judgment dated

25.02.2013 passed in CRP No.67O8 of 2OO3 and batch, had directed the RDO to conduct a fresh enquiry to ascertain rvhethcr there were J. 36 CVBR,J CRP No.527912016 & Batch i'-) any Protected Tenants in respect of the said land, and if so, to identi$ them and issue ownership certificates.under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act for Ac.36-25 gts from the retainable land in Sy. Nos. 51,52, and 53. Pursuant to the said remand, the RDo:passed order dated 15-10-2013 granting 38-E certificates for an extent of Ac.42-24 guntas of land in Sy. Nos. 5l, s2, and 53(part) from the retainable land. [t is submitted that Smt.Rehana Begum and ot]rers liled LRA No. 4 of 2o13 on rhe file of Land Refoirns Appeltate Tribunal, questioning the initial orders of the Land Refornrs Tritnrnal dated

09.12.1975 in the declararion filed by the respondenl The LRAT, vide orders dated 30- lo-2o 14, remanded the matter for fresh consideration, dirccting the LRT to decide the rights of the Appellants based on evidencc ancl aftcr impleading necessarJr parties. In the said remand proceedings, sri Habeeb Baig filed his claim, asserting that he was the legatce of Sri F-azal-tJr-Rab Baig, who had purchased land in sy.No.44 adme:rsuring Ac.L7 -2o guntas under registered sale deed in the year 1956, ..rncl contended that the said land was wrongly included in thc dcclar:rrion o[ M/s.Kastopa corporation, which had purchased the samc in the year 196l- The LRT, vide orders dated

07.10.2016, held rhat ir rvas not competent to decide the rights of inter se parties and norecl that the said land had already vested with the Government as surplus land. The Tribunal advised the parties to approach the appropriarc f<rrum. Aggrieved by the sarne, sri Habeeb 37 CVBR.J CRP No.5279DOt6 &Batch Baig filed LRA wo. 6 of 2077 on the fite of LRAT and the same was dismissed. challenging ttre same, cRp No.1372 of 2o2o was liled on the lile of this court. This Court vide judgment dated 2g-og-2o21, set aside the orders of LRAT and,drrected the LRT to delete the lands in Sy.No.zt4 admeasuring- Ac.L7-2o guntas from the declarant,s holding in cc No.264/w /75. Thte said orders have attained l-rnality as no appeal was liled. consequently, the said extent of Ac. LZ-2o gunras in Sy.No.44 has to be deleted from the holding of the respondent, and the LR't'is required to re-compute the holding accordingly, reverting back an equivalent extent of land. from the surplus land to the declarant. Subsequentln LRT-crrm-RDo reopened the Land Reforms case in cc No.2;,64/wllw5, wherein the respondenr filed a claim petition seeking (a) deletion of Ac.6-38 guntas wronglv shown in rhe declarant's holding, (b) deletion of Ac.42-12 gunt.rs caregorised as pote kharab lands in revenue records, and (c) clclerion of Ac. 42-24 guntas in Sy.Nos.Sl, 52, ,.and 53/P already covcrecl by the 3g-E certificat,:s issued to Protected Tenants. It is st.rtrmitrcd that thc orders dated 15-10-2013 were set aside by thc .I.rnt collector vide order dated 24.Ci9.2016 in Case No.F2lsaog/l3 erncl barch. The lcarned Senior Counsel emphasized that the t{orr'blc Division Bench irr cRP l{o 6708 of 2003 and batch had nrr discussed the pore kharab lands at a1[, and therefore, as per starurory mandate, the pote kharab lands included in the declarant's holcling musr be deleted, .(;l ..i 38 CVBR,J CRP No.5279120 t6 & Batch r\ and an equivalent extent of land must be reverted back to. the declarant from the surplus land vested with the state. It is pointed out that the LRT's finding that all tenants had surrendered their rights in 1964 was incorrect. The RDo, passed order dated 15-10- 2OL3 pursuant to the remand order and clarilied that surrender was only in respect of Sy. Nos. 35, 36, 37 , 40, 42, 4T , and 5O, and there was no surrender in respect of Sy.Nos .44, 45, 46, Sl, 52, and 53. The orders of the Hon'ble Division Bench attained linality in view of setting aside earlier orders as per the oblervations made in para No.95(b) of judgment. [t is submitted that the RDo ultimately held that there are four branches of tenants entitled to 3g-E or 3g-A certificates for the land admeasuring Ac.42-24 guntas from the retainable land in Sy. Nos.51,52, and 53. Thus the learned Senior counsel strenuously supported the case of revision petitioners and prayed this Court to set aside the impugned order in Case No.F2/54o812013, dated 24.09.2016, passed by Joint collector and restore the order dated 25.LO.2O13 passed by the RDO.

20. sri R.N.Hemendranath Reddy, learned senior counsel submitted that M/s.Kastopa corporation had originally filed a declaration under section 8(1) of the coAH Act, lgz3 asserting ownership over land admeasuring Ac. l9o- 17 gts situated at Gachibowli, acquired under two registered sale deeds from the legal - --'/' - ---z---' i3e CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch :4 4 heirs of Late llyas-Burni. Upon enquiry, the Land.Reforms Tribunal fur its ord'3r datedr Og.L2.Lg75 computed 3.2862.Standard Hotdings (SH) and di.rected surrender of 2.2862 SH as surplus land and the said order attained finality after dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition by this Court. tt is argud that the declarant surrendered Ac. L37-L7 gts on 05.C)5.1976 and possession was taken on 13.LO.L976, which was subseqrrently vested with the State. Thereafter, in the year L979, the Governrnent leased part of the surrendered land to an educational institution, which lead to file writ petitions by the prorected tenanrs, includin.g the predecessor of respondent No.7. Pursuant to orders in W.P.No.,159O,of 1980, the RDO conducted a thorough enquiry and issued er report dated 27.07.1981 conlirming tenancy rights under Section 37-A of the Tenancy Act for Ac.157-03 gts., covering Survey Nos.37, 40,42to47,51, and 53, originally held by Ilyas Burni, It is submitted that this Court in W.P.No.4O59 of 1982, held that the protectecl tenants are entitled to ownership certilicatcs under Section 38-E for Ac. 73-03 gts., which was aflirmed in W.A.No.1420 of 1987 and the said order attained Iinality. Thereafter, thc RDO issued certificatt)s on 25.0+.1995. The Land Reforms Appcllate Tribunal upheld the same and dismissed the appeal filed by thc Authorized Ofi-rcer, [a.nd Reforms. The declarant later sought rcopening of proceedings in 1996, but the Tribunal's interim orders \ /cre st:t aside in appeal, This Court in CRP No.3755 of 1997, while allowing the *{ 40 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch Cr revisiorf, directed re:cbrnputation of holdings excluding the lands covered by 38-E certificates and Pote Kharab areas. The LRT revised its computation on 18.02.1999, ultimately holding that onry 0.6236 SH was surplus, directing surrender of specific land in Sy.Nos.46, 47 and 53. It is further submitted that subsequent writs petitions and. appeals culminated in a Division Bench judgment dated 2s.o2.2o13 rernanding the matter to the RDO to consider the unresolved questions framed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3054 of 2006, particularly relating to protected tenancy rights, validity of alienations, and jurisdictional issues. The RDo passed detailed order dated 15.1o.2o13 confirming protecred tenancy and ownership rights under Sec.38-E and 38-A of the Tenancy Act, holding that the petitioners were entitled to ownership certificates. The Joint Collector, , however, without properly addressing the mandate of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Cr>urr had set aside the order of RDO on erroneous grounds, including the misconceived assumption that tenancy rights rl,erc surrendered placing reliance on G,O.Ms.No.183 dated 24.O3.2OO0, arnd alleging estoppel on account of sale deeds executed in violation o[ Section 38D. The Senior Counsel pointed out that the Hon'ble Suprcme Court in B.Bal Reddg a. Teegab. Naragana Reddg's case (supra) and Kotalah a. Protrrctay Assn. of tle Baptist Churches (P/ .Ltd's case (supra) had held that alienations in contravcnLion of Section 38-D 4t cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch were uoid ab inifio and that tenancy rights,could. not be extinguished withotrt compliance with Section 19 of the Tendrcy Act. It is conten.ded that the Joint Collector committed a fundamental error by assuming jurisdiction over issues already settled by the Division Bench of this Court and the LRT, failed to appreciate that ceiling surrender did not override tena5rcy rights, as held in I( Laxmo;lo,h a. Speclotl Tfrbunal?2. It is further submitted that neither the plot purchasers nor the Diamond Hills Welfare Association had'any lor:rzs t standi to challenge grant of certificates under Section 38-E or 38-A, which were based on longstanding protected tenancy rights recognized in prior judicial proceedings. The learned Senior Counsel while supporting the case of the revision petitioners submitted that the impugned order of the Joint Collector dated 24.09.2016 is unsustednable in law and liable to be set aside, and that the.RDO's order clated 15.10.2013 should be upheld. In support of his submiss;ions, the learned Senior Counsel relied upon the following decisions: fu.de S'uresh us. @aentment of A.P.23; Bo,karam Jangaiah @ Janga Reddy us. Gunde Laxmamma (died) per LRs24; Tax Recooery Officer II, So;d.ar, Nagpur us. fungadhar Vishul,ano;th Ronade (dead) through Shobha Ro;aindrrr Nemiutant2s; Choudhari Palkaji us. Rukmini Deui26; Kontham Anji Reddg 2rt9z8 scc online AP 25 (Para I l) " 1976 Supreme(AP) 243 1998 SCC OnLine AP 864 2n "1teeSy6 s(lc 658 'u 2ot6 SCC onLine Hyd 509 a 42 CVB&J CRP No.5279 120 16 & Batch t\ EfeQ per LRs os.'Itfuimi m taxmalah2z; Raj Kishan pershad. and. others us. Jolnt bllector-I qnd. other"281 V. Rqmasutormg vs. ffclte of Telangolno,2eand. A. Kondal Yadaa us. B. Chittorm'rreaab. 21. Mr.A.venkatesh, learned senior counsel reiterated the arguments advanced on behalf of the revision petitioners and placed reliance on decisions in Mulcanti Kistannma (dead.) through LRs and otlers us. s. venkatarcddg (dead) through LRs snd. other*r and Phlltlt Jega,singh os. The Jolnt Registrar of Co-operatiue Societies, Cln;tdarrnbo;nqno; Regiotto Tttticorin32 .

22. Mr.S.Sharath Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.47 in W.P.No.386O of 2008 submitted that the respondent has purchased an extent of Ac.1-31 gts in Sy. No. 5l of Gachibowli village under a registered sale decd bearing documenr No.2894 of 2OO3, dated 10.03.2003 and the said land forms parr of large extent of Ac.37.16 gts spread over Sy.Nos.5t, .52, ancl 53 (part), originally held by protected tenants whose rishts hat,e been recognized under Section 37-A of the Tenanr--v Acr. It is further submitted that the impugned order dated 24.Oq.2Ol (r perssr:cl b1' the Joint Collector-[, Ranga Reddy District in File No.l.-2l58t]5i 20t3 is vitialecl by serious procedural irnpropriety ancl l:rcks rrarlsperrcnc-y. tt is pointed out that hearing of the appeal \^rzrs conclucled on ---. ...: :1. ... ' ': _ " 20t8 SCC online Hyd 4E5 '*20t8 sCC OnLine Hyd,493 'n zo2 t 161 ALT 580 'o 2024 Supreme (Telangana) 344 "20to12;ALD I (sc) 'rFull Bench Judgmentdated22.0l.1992 passed in W.l,.No.6 l9l of'1990 hy rtrc Madras ltish Coun C. 43 CVBR,J CRP No.5279D016 &Batch

23.09.,2016 upon submission of written argumeqts by thp appetlants therein, and yet, the impugned order running into 253 pages was passed within 24 hours thereafter, which raises genuine suspicion about the manner in which the matter was dealt with. It is further submitted that on the date of impugned order i.e., 24.09.2O16, the Joint (lollector Mr. Rajat Kumar Saini, was on s€rnctioned leave. This fact is supported by G.O.Rt.No.2O79 dated 20.09.2A16 issued.under the A.l.S. (Leavet Rules, 1955, granting Earned l.eave to Mr. Saini from tl,4.Og.2}l6 to O6.10.2016 (both days inctusive) to trayel to Malaysria on private affairs. Therefore, the question nahrrally arises as to trow the Joint Collector, while on leave could have applied his independent mind ancl authored or signed an order after verification of voluminous record ',vithin such a short span of time and therefore, the cir,:umstances in which the impugned order carne to be passed cast a serious stradou, on its credibility. The oflicial records would clearly reveal that thc impugned order was prepared much earlier, possibly at the behcst o[ external influences, and the authority merely aflixed his signature on 24.O9.2OL6, when he was not in office. In such circumstances, where there is a clear apprehension of extraneous conside rations having influenced the adjudicatory process, this Court, being a Court of Record and custodian of constittrtional rights under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution ) of India, ought not countenance or sustain such an order. It is also 44 . cvB&J CRP No.5279 l2O 16 & Batch 11 submitted that tlre respondent No.47 is a bona fide purchaser under the registered sale deed and the impugned order prejudicially affects his title, and interest in Ac.1-31 gts in Sy. No.51. It iS further subrnitted that a registered sale deed cannot be declared uoid ab initio by an appellate authority under the Tenancy Act. It is further submitted that surrender of tenancy rights must strictly conform to Section 19 of the Act i.e, be in writing and subject to satisfaction of the Tahsildar and no such procedure has been followed in the present case. Further, G.O.Ms.No. 183 dated 24.O3.2OOO reclassifying the lands for residential use does not override the Tenancy Act. Sections 33 and 104 of the Tenancy Act confer overriding elfect on all other laws. [t is submitted that the impugned order is vitiatecl by lack of notice, violation of natural justice, excessive jurisdiction, and suppression of material evidence. The appellate authority failed to appreciate each issue independently and simply echoed previous findings without applying its mind properly and thereb-v causing grave prejudice. The learned counsel relying upon the Procecdings No.E112645176 dated 08.11 .1996 of the Special Ofi-rcer and Competeqt Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad submitted that Sri C.Hanumantha Rao, learned counsel appearing lor the respondents in these revisions and petitioners in W.P.No.386O/2OO8, has appeared as counsel for the Kastopa Corporation in the Declaration liled before the ULC Authorit5r and submitted that the f-) 45 CVBR,J CRP No.527912016 & Batch lands are not held by the declarant firm and tJrege are protegted firms for th,e last 4O years and there were conferred tenarrtslr rights under Section 37A of the Tenancy Act and their names were recorded in the Protected Tenancy Register and further, succession was granted on ., the ne:mes of legal representatives of the deceased protected tenants and they are in possession of the said lands. The learned counsel submitted that now in these revisions, Sri C. FlanumantJra Rao, learnerl counsel cannot change his stand and su.bmit that the protected tenants have already surrendered tl.ejr lands. Thus the learne<l counsel submitted that the impug4ed ,order dated 24.09.:2016 passed in File No.F2l588512OL3:and batch by the appellate authority is illegal, unsustainable and prayed to uphold the . rights rtf ttre respondent No.47 under the registered sale deed dated lO.O3.ilOO3. [n support of his submissions, learr-ted counsel relied upon the fcr'llowing decisions: Chondra Shekor Rao o,nd others us. Baloiah ond olilterssg' SiCa Ralm (dead) through Legal Representutloes us. Blurat Singh (dead) through Legal Representatlves and. otlerss4; J.*Ieenakshi and, r:,nother us. The District Reglsttur, Registration Departmen\ Puducherry and other*s.

23. M r. Kccrthi Kiran Kota, lcarned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioncr in W.P.No.l I 157 of 2olg supported the sr,rbmissions on behalt of thc revision petitioners and relied on the following decisions: t t "sLP (Ciuit) No.l 7186-t 7i88 of 201i dared 07 10.2013 3'(20 tg) lo scc { r2 "2023 0 Supremc lMad) 2401 .i I 46 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2O16 & Batch .,-.\. i us. se@uddtnsT; Ramchandra 'Keshaa Adke os.. Goulrtd .ftltt chanlart8s; Mukesh Guptn os. Hlndu Kengo Mahanrtdgo;lasg; Sha,ltntsr Tor Products us. ILC. Srtil-rnd4o; Bo,drlnotfr'as. @ut- of Tamllnadual; state oJ Kerala us. Prttl,'rlnlcotrua2; Babu parq.st Kallcgdt os Babuts; HCL Kodt vs. DLF (lnitrersal Ltd44; M.p. *ate Agro Industrles Development Cotp. os. Jahan Klianas; Deepak Agro Faod,s us. State of Rqjasthanaa.

24. Mr.K.R.Prabhakar, learned senior counsel relied upon the decisions in Ashwo,ni Kumar singh us. u.p. pttblie settice commission and other*7; Bhavnagar Unhtersitg us. palrtana sugar Mlll (P) Ltd and. othersas; Diti.slonal controllea r(sRff us. Mahadeua shettg and. another<g and Anar singh as. tlnron of Indta and other#o. OF THE CASE OF THE RESPONDENTS:

25. Sri c.v. Mohan Rcddy, learned senior counsel for Respondent No.l-Association in w.P. No.11157 of 2019, submits that the RDo's 8 scc 395 (Paras 16 & t7) "1tlSl; Supp. I SCR 528.6l{t 3',(tge6) I scR 235 (Para 240 G) "1t925; I scc 559 (para 7) "(tggz)4 scc 525 (Para t2) ttsag) I scc 70 (Para l]) {r(2000) uirdoii ro scc ret (Para e) n'{2oo4y r scc 68 t tnlzoos;7 n'(zooz) sCC 79t (Para 32) to Scc 88 (Para t2) '6(z0og) 7 sCC 748 (Para I 7) "1zoo3; I I scc 584 (Para t2) "(2oo:) 2 SCC I I I (para 59r oo(zoo3) 7 SCC t97 (para 2i) 5u(2Ot t) 7 SCC 69 (Paras 59 and (r0) t I f"r 47 CVB&J CRP No.5279120 16 & Batch erder da.ted 15.09.2013 is without jurisdictign, as it heavily relied on the enqrriry report dated 27.07.198I and subsequerlt proceedings, which were already declared @ram non judie and, uoid. ab initio by the Division Bench. He submits that the Division Bench categorically held that only the Tahsildar, not the RDO, is the competent authority under Rr-rle 14 read with Rule 26 of the Tenancy Rr-lles to enquire into issues of succession to deceased protected tenants. Section 38-E certi{icates granted by the RDO on 25.04.1995 were hetd to be without jurisdiction, lacking probative value and incapable of supportirrg claims of protected tenancy. The Division Bench noted discrepancies in the number of protected tenants shown across proceedings, tampering of revenue records, and faiture to produce the f,rnal tenerncy register. It directed the RDO to re-examine whether the 1981 report had any evidentiary value and whether he had jurisdicti,cn to determine protected tenancy claims. However, the RDO wrongly :;tated that the report was upheld in W.A. No. L42O of L987 and not set aside by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, ignoring that the Division Bench alrcacly declared those orders void. The Senior Counsel r:ontends that the RDO did not independently verify records or assesr; the cvidentiary value of the 1981 report and failed to resolve the doubts regarding the identity of the protected tenants. The Joint Co:.lector rightly held that the RDO was not acting in the capacity ,rf a Tribunal under the Tenancy Act, and the report lacks 48 cvB&J CRP 1.Io.5279l20 16 & Batch statutory sanctity. It is also pointed out that 'no..section 3g_E certilicates were ever granted for sy.Nos.Sl , s2, and 53, and the alleged tenants never challenged the non-grant, thereby extinguishing their claims. The Division Bench, while answering lssues 5, 7, and 8 framed by the Honble strpreme court, held that the order dated 31.O5. 1975 of the LRT attained finality as the alleged protected tenants failed to raise objections despite notices. There were no allegations of fraud or misrepresentation to:ieopgn those proceedings under Scction 9-A of the coAH Act: At para s4, it was held that the CoAH Act, being a later legislation witlt a non obsitante clause, overrides rhe Tenancy Act. The LRT has exclusivejufisdiction under the ceiling Act to determine protected tenrincy or valid surrcndcr ancl treecl rr-rl wait for decisions under the Tenancy Act. At Para 62, it r,r'as concluded that lands in Sy. Nos. ss td gz, 40, 42 to 47 and, 53 vestccl irrevocably in the State under section 11 of the coAH Act ancl a.-\, transacrions by alleged protected.tenants w.ere void. The RDo, howevcr, iailed to consider these aspects and erroneously relicd on the report dated 27.o2.19g1 to ortend benefits under Sections 38 and 38-E without examining family holdings, contlary [o [he direction of the Hon'bte Division Ben6fi. The Joint collector rightly concluded thar only Ac.36.2s gts retained by Kastopa c,rporation could be considered for section gg-E benefits, and any ownership certihcate beyond that extent was illegal. As to .1r:. ! i t 49 CVB&J CRP No.5279 l2O I 6 & Batch the 38-A certificates grq4ted by the,rRDo on .28.O4.2OO1, it is submitted that the Divisign Bench, at Paras 72 and 73, held that applications under Sections 38-A and 38-B cannot be made simrrltanteoysly and that no original.tenancy records were produced by the appticants. The RDO failed to examine the records or verify cei.ling timits and issued orders without notifying purchasers of Diamon,l Hills, thereby violating natural justice. At Paras 90 and 92, it was h,eld that these orders do not bind such purchasers. Regarding G.O.Ms. No.183 MA dated 24.og.2aoo, it is submitted that under Section 1O2(e) of tl:e Tenancy Act, once land is notified in the Ofl-rcial Gazntts as falling under urban or non-agricultural development, the Tenanqr Act ceasep,to apply. Since' the G.O. notilied the land as a residential z,orte, it no longer quatifies as agricultural land. Therefore, it is su.bmitted that the RDO'S orders granting 38-E and 38-A certificat:es, based on the void report dated 27-O7.1981, are without jurisdiction and cannot bind the purchasers of Diamond Hills Welfare Association. The alleged protected tenants, having acquiesced to the sale ancl failed to challenge final orders under the Ceiling Act, are estopped from raising fresh claims. It is prayed that the rights of the purchasers be upheld and the claims of the alleged protected tenants be dismissed. The learned Senior Counsel placed reliance on the decision:s 50 cvB&J CRP No.52792016 & Batch a') Chanumclu Nintro..la os. Chanu,rrrolu Indbu. Derrlsr; VCharait us. -Eussein. Nltanu Jamadansz; Ishwor lhilt os. Lanid, equ*ition bllector a nd. o,notherss ; e. N,,rastml.-, o". e.xrtJ,il, ilio)o,.i Lachato,h vs. Joint Collectofs; vorla namacnandtu,'n"iil o". Jolnt Collectofe. 26. Mr.E-Madan Mohan Rao, learned senior counser submitted that Section lo(5) of the coAH Act clarifies that the surrender of land in possession of a protected tenant is not automatic, especially when such possession amounts to an encumbrance. It is further submitted that in view of Section 102(e) of the Tenanry Act, the provisions of the Tenancy Act cease to apply to lands notified for urbar-r, non- agricultural or industrial purposes. It is submitted that under Section 12(21 of the urban Areas (Deveropment) Act, rgrs, the State Government issued G.o.Ms.No.rg3, dated 24.og.2ooo and in terms of said G.O., lands situared in Gachibowli Village were reclassified from "conservation and Recreational/Tourism use : z-otte,, to "Residential Use zone", thercby altering the character of the lands and extinguishing tenancy rights. It is also submitted that as per section 388 of the Tenancy Act, the petitioners were not in actual possession of the subject lancls as on 01.01 .lgrg, and hence could not claim the sratus o[ protecred Tenants under section gg(z) of the Act. Furrhermore, the petitioncrs had not been gftrnted ownership trlee+1t;Apt.J j9.t (para IZ) llloeq I scc 27i liara ey 531zoos; z scc t90 t200s scc online AI' 444 (paras I8. 20.23. 24) $2OtS SCC Online Hyd 9g (l,aras i0.j2.34) x2021 SCC Ontine TS 701 (paras 24.25.28:9.30.1t) -/ --/'' 5r CVBR,J CRP No.527912016 & Batch certiflca,[es under Section 38E prior to the reclassification of the lands, lJrereby disentitling them from seeking oulnership rights thereaftr:r. It is contended that under Section 3(i)(iv) read with Section 3(t) of the CoAH Act, a Person deemed to be a tenant under any Tenancy law is glso governed by the CoAH Act, and that the Act extinguishes the rights, title, and interest of such tenants in the same manner as it does in tl:e case of landholders. Consequently, in view of Section 13 of the CoAH Act, the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to exercise pow€rs under Section 38E of the Tenancy Act stands ousted. The leanred Senior Counsel submitted that even if the land continues to be used for agriCtrlfural purposes, the notil-rcation operates as a legal bar:, thereby overriding the applicability of thc Tcnatrcy Act, extinguisihing alt .rights and obligations under it, along n,ith the jurisdiction of authorities constituted thereunder. In strpPort of his submissions, leanred Senior Counsel relied upon thc dccisions in Roshc;n All Khan & others as. Raia Kishendas &, others'7 and Gc;nda;icth @feQ Per L.Rs o;nd. others us. Government of And.hra Prad.esh rep. W Auttadsed. Oflicer (LR), Mo.hbubnaga-5s.

27. Mr. J. Prabhakar, leanned Senior Counsel, subrnittt'rl that the Division Bench, in its order dated 25.O2-2O13 catcgorical[r' trcld that the surplus land of Ac. L37.L7 gts in Sy.Nos. 35 to 37.40.42 to 47, " t961 SCC ()nline AP 217 @aras 4 to 6) "2oo r 121 Al,T 604 52 CVB&J CRP No.5279l201d & Batch and 53 had irrevocabry vested in tlre state under section 11 0f tl.e coAH Act, and any transactions by the alleged protecied tenants or landholders ar,e uoid. ab initio. The ce,ing proceedings attained finality with dismissal of c.R.p (sR) No.2 469g of 19z6 on 28.o4.L926 and could not be reoperred in coilateral proceedings. orders subsequenfly passed by the Land Reforms Tribunal and confirmed in appear were held to be without jurisdiction and nullity. It is contended that the Division Bench in paras T2 and 73 treated the petitioners, application as one under Section 3g-8, requiring randlord rerinquishment in f,avour of protected tenants. The evidence relied upon was contradictory and inadequately addressed by the RDO, who proceeded to grant 3g-A certificates without proper scrutiny. A new application under Section 3T-A was filed, despite unclear claims. It is pointed out that purchasers in w.p. No. I 1rs7 of 2or9 acquired lands in the year 2003, after issuance of 3g-A certificates, and in cRp No. 67o8 of 20o3, the Division Bench at para 90 herd that such orders do not affect rights of earlier purchasers. The learned Senior counsel alleged that there is tampering of revenue records, as noted in Para 7g of the Division Bench,s order, with the report dated 27 07.198r of the RDo bei'g based bn suspicious and manipurated entries. Even assuming that 37-A proceedings were in favour of the Petitioners, they would fair due to non-furfilment of the family holding requirement. .It is further argued that only four protected tenants 53 CVB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch were orlSnally recordeq later claims by others *"r" unexplained. tr:t is asserted that the land ad'measuring Ac.194.OO' gts originally belonged to Lingamma and was validly transferred to Kastopa Corporation. The RDO's rpport dated 27.O7.L981 and the orders dated 31.O5.L971 recorded v4lid surrenders under Section 19 of the Tenancy Act during 196ff, covering the entire land. Relyigg on Borndl Krishnarrrurthg os. Pa,supuleti Venkortesorrrrse he argued \ that lawlul possession on t]re date of commencement of Amendment Act, 19515 is a precorrdition for relief under Section 37-A, which was not futfilled by t}e Petitioners, as shown in Sesala Pahani. Section 37-A apF,lications made in 2013 based on a 1958 register fail due to non-comrpliance with family holding criteria, as demonstrated through Notification No.53 dated 02.08.1954. [t is also submitted that mere references to Section 37-A in sale dceds do not confer tenancy rights on the Petitioners, especially whcn thc plot purchasers did not e:recute the salddeeds and cannot bc bound try such recitals. The RDO's order dated 15.10.2013, passed contrary to the Division Bench's clirectives to consider original records aflrcsh, is vitiated, as it relied sol:ly on the report dated 27.O7.1981 and zrrtritrarily expanded land extent. The petitioners in CRP Nos.1588 arrcl 2437 of 20 l7 have no subsis,ting rights, their narnes do not appear in tfre 1958 tenancy record, and they did not challenge thc Tribr-rnal orders. Public '"r96t11)An,thwR4l3 54 CVBR.J CRP No.5279l20t6 & Barch r') records, including compromise decrees in A.s. No. 25 of 195g and recorded surrenders 'before the Tahsildar and RDo, confirm relinquishment of rights by petitioners and other claimants. The Petitioners'relianci on section 3g-D is mispraced as the protections therein apply only to involuntar5r or fraudulent surrenders, which is not the case here. The petitioners voluntarily executed sale deeds and ratified transactions. Thus he urged that the present civil Revision Petitions are without merit and prayed to dismiss the same.

28. Mr- B. chandrasen Reddy, learned senior counsel submitted that the land ceiling declaration liled by M/s Kastopa corporarion was duly computed under section g of the coAH Act, 1973, and rhe surplus land was takeninto possession by the State on r3. Lo.rgz6. The revision petitioners neither challenged the computarion nor the surrender proceedings under section r3(s), making botrr binding upon them. He contended that although both the Tcner.c1, Act :rnd the coAH Act have ran-obstante clauses, they operare in crifferent fields and neither of them overrides the other. As the coAIl Act bcirg a later enactment, it must be presumed that thc [-cgisraturc considcrcd priol laws and hence, surrender and computati.n ordcrs under the coAH Act prevail, especially when unchaile.gecr. Thc petitioners are estopped from questioning them and thc principle of waiver relied on B.L. sreed.ha.r us. r{.M. Muniredd.s "':" :3':'-1: f-' 55 cvB&J, CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch and otlersfo, to assert tllat eStoppel c+n apply to the relinquishment of rightri in immovable propert5r. He further submitted that statutory and offir:ial orders enjoy the presumption of regulariqr under Section 11a(e) c,f the Evidence Act and cannot be casually reopened. The Appellate Authonity forrnd that Kastopa Corporation surrendered Ac.137..17 gts in Sy.Nos.35 to 37,40,42 to 47 and 53 towards its surplus holding, and the LRT accepted this surrender on 06.10.1976. Possession was taken through panchanama on 13.10.1976, and compen:;ation notices were published in the year 1989. The petitiont:rs never claimed compensation, which shows that they had no rights. Thus the lands in Sy.Nos.sl, 52, and 53 were not part of the surrendered area, and the petitioners cannot now invoke Section 13(5) to reopen concluded proceedings. Regarding the effect of grant of owne,rship certificates, he submitted that while Section 388 certilicale is a statutory grant by the State, Section 38A or 38(6) certil-rcal.e results from a mutual agreement between the landholder and pro[ected tenant. Both confer full ownership, but this issue is academi,c and does not advance the petitioners' case. He submitted that the petitioners themselves, along with Kastopa Corporation, executeii joint sale deeds between 1985 and 1987 and the Tenancy Act does not bar such joint conveyances. A joint sale by a landholder and ten:Lnt, reflecting their respective 4Oo/o and 6O%o interests, is * (zoo:) 2 scc 155 = AIR 2ooi sc 578 56 cvBR J CRP No.5279l20t6 & Batch a-) legally valid ahd binding.'The present challenge by petitioners is a dishonest attempt to invalidate these transactions and defraud bona frde purchasers, which must be rejected on equitable grounds. [t is also argued that the Tenancy Act does not permit the issuance of joint ownership certificates under sections 3gE or 3gA, as entitlement is based on individual family holdings. Both provisions aim to confer full ownership by eliminating the landholder,s title, but only to individual claimants. Hence, joint certificates arc statutorily impermissible. The petitioners' alteged protected tenancy rights were validly surrendered, and such surrenders were nevcr appealed or revised. The surrender of surplus land under rhe cciling Act is unrelated to tenancy rights under the Tenancy Acr. once the ceiling Act came into force in Lg7g, tenancy rights becamc subject to the declarant's retainable land, and any protected tcnalnt coulcl bccome a (iovernment tenant in respect of surplus rands vcstccl in t5r: State. Finally, he reiterated that the statutory schemc o[ rhc -lcp2pcy Act, irrcluding the L973 amendment introducing Sc<:tion 3[tli), zrr-rcl the original provision of Section 38A, does not pcrrnrr granr of joint, ,,''wnership certificates. Thus, thc claim of tlrc 1;utitioncrs is legally unsustainable and prayed for dismissal of thc rc:vision petitions. In support of his submissions, the learned Senior Clounsel rcliccl upon the decisions: o 57 CVBR.J CRP No.5279 t20 16 & Batch Agodhyla Nagar Co-operatfute Xot4slte Socfetg/ Ltd us. @vernnnent of Andhra Pradesh and. othe"g6r; P<qn{f Shatrzna- w *ate oJ Blhar & other:J,z; Rafigue Blbi its. Sagea Wiflirtddtn & other$rs; Ilarpal Singh us. Asltok Kumar o;nd. otlrrlr*t and Sushma Kapoor as. Gouentment of I,ICT of Delht ortd. anotlrclf,s.

29. sri B. venkata Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondent No.76 in c.R.P.No.5279/2016 submitted that under section lo2 of the Ter,ancy Act, 1950, the subject lands have been notified and t reservecl under the provisions of the Urban A.reas Act; 1975, vide G.O.Ms.No.41l MA dated 27.Og.1"975 and subsequent G.o.Ms.Nos.353, 85 and 183. consequently, the revision petitioners have nc, right to maintain an application for issuance of tenancy certificates under sections 38, 38-A or 38-E of the Tenancy Act, warrantrng dismissal of these revisions. He argued that the core issue is whettrer the Tenancy Act, l95o ceased to apply to the lands of Gachibowli village u'.e.f. '27-og- 1975 by virtue-of Section 102(e) of the Tenancy Act, sincc thcse lzrnds have been earmarked for urban area developnrent undcr G.O.Ms.Jt{o.41 1 dated 27-O9-I975 and subsequ,:nt notificzrtions. He contended that the Tenancy Act no longer applies ro thcsc lands and the revision petitioners cannot invoke its provisions to claim any tenancy rights. He further argued SCC ()nLine Ap 106 ( I,aras 8 and 9) 6'1996 62(lgg6) l0 SCC 671 (t,ara l. .l and 5 ) ur200+1t ) SCC 287 (Para 7) s(zota) ll scc I l-i (l,aras 4. 5. {,t anrl ()) u51212l) SCC Online De I -5 t70 (paras 7. 8 and 9) b : ;:_i€i:: \i -- 58 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l20t6 & Batch a.--\ that the revision petitioners themselves declared in the GPA dated

30.01.1981 that ttrey had purchased the lands ufider an unregistered sale deed, thus changing their status from PTs to purchasers' As such, having ctaimed a superior status as purchasers, they cannot revert to an inferior status as PTs to claim tenancy rights Further, he contended that the revision petitioners forfeited any tenancy rights by refusing to exercise the right of purchase under Section 38-D and consenting to sale in favour of third-party plot owners' This atnounts c* to tull compliance with Section 38-D, thereby extinguishing any claim for ownership under Sections 38 or 38-A. It rvas also submitted that the original landholders and the so-called PTs lost their status to invoke any provisions of the Tenancy Act under Sections 38, 38-4, 38-8, or 38-E. Once the land was sold and conveyed under registered sale deeds, neither the landholders nor the PTs could legally give consent or claim tenancy rights under these scctions, particularly as the PTs' status was extinguished by their own dcclarations and conduct. Regarding the genuineness of the certificatcs in Annexure-3 dared 25.05-1958 and 28.05.1958 and the provisional tenancy list of : 1958, he pointed out that these were manil>ulated documents without any supporting record, as found in thc reporL of thc RDO dated 27.07.1981 and orders of the Joint collecLor. No original tenancy records or 37-A certificates exist, and rcpeatcd attempts by authorities to produce them failed. He furthcr argued that the 1v-\ 59 ..:' CVBR.J ' CRP No-52T)DOl6 & Batch ,. . r4tu1 '#EI'-J " -' - i:"#i' - ,1ri- :'*' '.. revisior: petitioners themselves admitted before the ,[€nd Reforms Tribunerl in compromise petitions that they y..qre nerrbr in possession of the lands and did not press their claim under Section,38;E, which has atlained finality. The revision petitioners also' did not . seek restoration of possession within one month as required under Rule lO(21and (3) of thc 1956 Rules, leading to forfeiture.of any. tenancy rights. 'ilhe learned counsel also subrnitted that 588 plot holders have been in possession for over three decades, havinglchanged -the nature of the l:rnd from agricultural to urban, with su$gfAqtiat investments made. He relied on the decision of Hon'lcle. Srpru* Court in Ponnaht Narsing Rao us lVatto llo- Panta\di, ,q4g,r,gfhers06 and argued that PI's c:tnnot reclaim tenancy rights, qftgr,a lopg period. Regarding the effcc:t o[ permissions under Sections 47 af,id 48, he argued that tt'rc 'l'irhsildar would not have gfant€d alienation permission it ['f rrghts still existed, further confirming the extinguishme nt ol' I/l staLus. He also emphasized that the findings of authorities ttrirt srrr:t't'ssion under Section 40 is void are binding and precludr: any clrrirns lrv allegcd descendants of PIs. In conclusion, he submittt:d ttrirt thc rt'vision petitioners, in collusion with the landholcters, [r:rr'<' rnitirrtccl thcse proceedings merely to reclaim lands fraudulently altcr t'xt:t:tttit'tg sale deeds in favour of plot holders. The character of the lancl hits irrctrievably changed to urban plots, and 6lresty 9 -(.cc l8 r 60 .i;.'qP CVBR,J irlo.5279l20 I 6 & Batctr av1 third-party rights have been created. As such, tlre revisions are devoid of merit and should be dismissed, confirmirrg th" order of the Joint Collector, since no jurisdictional error, illegality, or material irregutarity has been established by the revision petitioners. In support of his submissions, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: Sged Sharfuddin us. Andreuts6\ .R.S. Madanappa us. Chand.ramma. & Othersr,a; Naginda.s Ramda.s aS. Dalarpatralrn Ichharann6e; Cho;m.anlo,l R. Patel us. Sta;tc of A.P. bg Dist Collector, Chittoor7o; Bai Doscrbai & others as. Mathurdas Gioolndd.as & otherszll Gram Panchagat & others us State of Andhra Pra.deshT2; So,da us. ?ahslldar, Utnoor (sup.4; Samo,la Venkr;lah & Others us. Baklca Nagalah & ortlterszs; P.V. Satganaragana Rqiu us. Kanumari Janukiiana. R{,u & others74; Vijagdbai & others us. Shrirzm Tvkaro;m & Otherszs; ffrr;te of A.P vs Nallamilti Ro;mi Reddg & othersze; Sihiua K;untor Sllcnna us. Sorntosh Kumarizr; Gongula. NarsinrJld & others us. @fi. of A.P78' Boddam Narsimha us. Hasan Ali Khan (deod bg LR) Others.Te; State of A.P. us. T. Yadagfri Reddg & Others.so; Bc;nk of Ind.ia us. K. Mohandas & Athers.st; Prtshpa Patel Clunfra as. Mandal Reuenue Officer, Malkqigiri Mdndal, RR Dist & other*2; Agaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan us. State of Mahara.shtra & other*e; Maddagunta Muthamma. and others os. The Joint Collector, Hgderabad and other*a; B. Laxmi and 6'r96a AwR r l7r *unN ulscloi 56/ 1965 * getq r scc 212 'ol9z6 SCC online Ap I t2 "MANU/sc/o i44irglo '2MANUvApro r40/r982 'rret8 1r; ALT 703 " 1991 s(:C (Jnline AP 390 'ln,tRNt usclo729i r9e8 ,tzoorl T scc 708 "(zoot) 8 scc 600 "Judgment dated 3 1.12.2007 passed in W.t'} No. 21076 of 2003 'oMANU/sc/7osoi2oo7 soMANUlscl8 ji8/2008 t'MANUlsclo49ri2oog 8rzoto (6) ALT 693 t'(2ot:) 4 scc 465 8'MANU/APi I l2ot2ot6. 6t . z;..:t-E CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch others. os. @vt. of A.P. ond. otherses'and K. Rgfito;m and. others as. DrPagtqlah (dted) per LRs ornd otlurs&. 30. Mr.C.Hanumantha Rao, learned counbel appearitg for t]re respondents/plot owners submitted that this Court while \ adjudicau.ng the present batch of Civil Revision Petitions.,-may be pleased to consider the lundamental issue that t]re r"raffirr"stion, admeasuring Ac.36-25 guntas, are part of an approved layout consistinE; of existing plots and have long ceaqed to be agricultural lands. Consequently, the provisions of Tenartcy Act, 1950, are not applicable to these plots. It is further submitted that various Government orders, revenue records, and statutory orders, clearly establish Lhat there are no subsisting agrictrtturat tenancy rights in respect ot: the lands in Sy.Nos.Sl, 52, and S3(part) situated at Gachibow:i Village. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have failed to produce any Form-B certificate issued by the Tahsildar, which is a mandatory statutory requirement to establish valid protected tenancy claim under Section 37-A of Tenancy l.ct. Moreover, there is no credible evidence whatsoever to show that the petitioners or their ancestors were ever in possession of the subjec[ lands as protected tenants. On the contrary, the statutory orders anrl findings of the Land Reforms Tribunal, which held a detailed statutory enquiry under Section 87 and exercised the powers ttMAN urtLl l ti99/202i 86 Judgment dated 22.03.2024 passed in C.R.P No. 169 of 2012 by this Court. }_ \b 62 CVBR"J CRP No.5279l2016 & Barch r._) conferred under Section 89(21of the Tenancy Act, cleafl5l dcihonstfate '.-r'; Urat tft$e were no protected tenancy .claims subsisting in-these sumey numbers. The starurory order dated 3l-os-1925 passed by the I"and Reforms Tribunal has attained finatit5r, as it was never challenged by the petitioners or their predecessors. This order, which was passed under section 38-E(5) after an enquiry into the genuineness of rhe alleged tenancy rights and the purported surrender of tenancy, catcgorically negates the exislence of any protected tenanc.v- claims over the lands in question: It is also submitted that M/s. Kastopa corporation, whichl*"s the.original declarant in the proccedings under the coAH Act, 1973, filed a .declaration under Secrion 8(I) of the said Act on o9-04-197s. " significantly, in this clcclara.tion, no mention waq.made of any tenancy claims b-v ar]_l.' alk:gcd tenants, further undinscoring the . falsity of the clairns no\\' I)!-r! forth by the petitionirs. It is further submitted that the Aclrlition;rl Divisional Revenue OIIicer, in his order dated 09-12- 1975, rlcrr:rrninccl rhe holding of M/s.Kastopa corporation r.o bc 3.tr832 stzrndard holdings and declared 2.2g62 standard holdings urs c'xcess, n,hich was confirmed in appeal in L.R.A. No.lO/t976 ancl firrall), bt' this Court on 08-0a-1976.'tie learned counsel points out thztt "ll n() s[age during these proceedings neither before the original :rulhoritl,, nor in the appellate proceedings, did M/s. Kastopa corporariorr or rhc alleged tenants raise an{_ glaim \ \ d"4 --'-- t' 63 CVBR,J CRP No.5279nOrc&Batch under iJection 37-A of the Teqancy Act. Conseqtrently, the orders of the Land Reforrns Tribulal and the Appellate Tribunal, as well as the orders rrf this Court, have attained finality under Sections 11 and 28 of the OoAH Act, which have overriding effect over all other laws. In view of these final orders, there is no legal or factual basis for the petitioners to claim any protected; tenancy rights or seek -issuance of Section 38-E certificates in respect of the existing plots in the layout. The leeLrned counsel ft-trther submits that the present claim of protecte:d tenancy in the guise of seeking Section 38-E certificates is nothing but a continuation of a'fraudulent attempt to interfere with the rights of lawful plot owners. The learned counsel submits that the existing plots in the layout have been in continuous, exclusive, and Iawful F,ossession of the plot owners for more than four decades, as evidenccd by the registered sale deeds executed by M/s.Kastopa Corporation as vendor No.1 and the alleged tenants as vendor No.2. The rights, title, and possession of these plot owners have been established beyond doubt by the documentary record placed before this Cotrrt, including the Government orders regularizing the layout and thr: various communications from the H_vderabad Urban Development Authority (now HMDA). It is also submitted that the elaborat: reasoning and tractual lindings recorded in the orders o[ Hon'ble Division Bench in C.R.P. Nos.67O8 and t2OO of 2003, dated 25-02-2013, have also attained finalitY, as the Special Leave Petitions ., .4 64 cvBR"J CRPNa527920l6 & Barch ('j filed against the same were dismissed by theHonble Sggreme Court. These find.ings, which include categorical obsewations regarding the absence of any tenancy claim and the fraudulent nattrre of the petitioners'assertions, are binding on the petitioners ih the present batch of Civil Revision Petitions. Under these circumstances, the learned counsel submits that the entire batch of Civil Revision Petitions are devoid of merit and constitutes an abuse of process of law and ultimately prayed to dismiss the present batch of Civit Revision Petitions, upholding the lawful rights of the'plot owners and putting an end to the vexatious and fraudulent litigation. Inlsupport of his submissions, the learned counsel relied upon tJre following decisions: Bandi Krishnamurthg us. Pasupuletl Venlcotegamtt; Nallari Rangai Seshagiri Rcro us. Mo,llani Acltalallse; T.R.Thandur as. Anion of India and otherssel Tvmatl Rangagga is. State of Andhra Pradesh and otherseo; Chief Jtrsttce of Andhtu. Pradesh rlnd others us. L.V.A. Dixitulu and atlterser; Poottann Bal and others as. A. Jarneer Bhikkue2; Bgram Pesta4li Gio;t.i;uto,la vs. Anlon of India and otherre3; IVcrtLa. Yo,koob S/o. Bo.la futtatah us. The Government of And.hra Pradesh; Retrcnue (UC.fi) Department rep. bg its Secretary Secretatlat and othersea; S.P.Chengaluaraga Naidu us Jagannathes; Uwttshanlcar and another us. Joshi Amba Shrrnkar Famllg Tra$t o;nd other"e6; S. t' 196r AwR 4 r-'i * cnp N":ola or tqr,i datctl ll o6 r996 s(tsso) 3 scc 6eo setR tgzg AP 106 t'1tsts1 2 scc l4 "t987 sCC online AI, l4-l '3AIR l99r sc2234 stggz scc online AP tol " AIR I99+ sc 8-s3 *AIR 1996 sc 2202 R 65 CVB&J CRP No.527924rc & Batch Rcagaich .and. othets os. @llector, Medak and. othersel MD. Naotttl lloda us. Blbl Ratfarnnl,so'. and otherse8; P.S. Rao us. Pttlti Ra;mg;iah and. Spectutl officer and a;noGher us. Potto otlters. ,dr. Salkic , Buslne;ssm,.etts Assocfctton and Glthers os. Houtrah Municlpal Cotpot,atlon and otlnririlol; .K.R.I#lshnaveni us. Jolnt Collector, Hgderabad. ottd. othctsr@i Tte gto:te of A.P and. others us. AL Audikeso;ua Reddg and othersros; Renu Devi vs. Mahendra Singh c;nd. otherslga; eshuant Kunrar Singh us. U.P. Prtblic Seny'rce Commission and 6rgl1rl7slos' Divislondl Controller, I(SRI]C us. Mahantern. S,rtc@laei Bhaurao Dagdu Pq.ro.lkar us. Sitrl:te of MalunushtraraT; S,@a.df Begrum (dieQ bg LRs and. otlrcrs us. Joint Collector, Medalg Sangareddg and otherstos; Bod.dam Narsd;rnlro. us. Hasan .Ali Ktun(dead) bg I.Rs and Others.loe' T.La./r*thmipathi and others us. P.ilithgananda Reddg and otlralrsrrc; Ia./rlihrrnt Bo;l os. Pedda La.kshman (died) bg LRs and. Others;.rlr; A.V.PapqgW Sastrg/ o;nd others us. Gouentment of A.P and. othe7s772 ; Dharnu, No.;llca vs. Ranna. Naika and Anr.lrs. Yunus Ali (dead1 $hroltgh .LRs and others us. Khursheed. Akramf ta; P.J.Chacla qtd, Another vs. Chalrman, Life Insurance and C:orporutl,on of ltdla and otters.tts' Delhi Deueloprnent Autltorlty, IV.D and, Anr tls,. Joint Actlon Committee, Allottee of S.PS .F,l,ats qnd Ulrais.rrut Sttll Lamp &, Ind.ustries Pvt Ltd us. Sta;tu of Haryanatt?; Abdul Ro,him and. others us. Sk. Abdul Zabar and otlrersTts' Thota knga. Laxmi ond another us. "ree613; ALD 351 (DB) n'(rgg6) 7 scc767 '"reea 1+y ALD 697 ",2oot (l) ALD525(DB) ""AlR 2o('t sc 2z9o "'r12ool; loscc665 'u'12002; I scc227 'ooAIR 2oca sc t608 '05(2ooi) ll scc5g4 '*1zoo3;7 scc l9z 'o'AIR 2oo5 sc 3330 (l) 'n8zooz12; ALD 235 's AtR 2oo7 sc I145 "o;\lR 2007 SrC2427 "'2oo71l)r\LD 614 "'12007; t.scc22l "]AIR 2oo8 sc 1276 "'12008; 7 scc 293 "tAIR 2oo8 sc4z4 "UAIR 2oog sc 1343 "'12009; 7 scc 363 "tzoos) 6 scc t6o 66 cvBR J CRP No.5279l20t6 & tsarch c) huernmcnt of lndrva pro,des,'. and. otheTsrre; ueghir,ra and. othcrs us. G. Narostnl.- Reddg "rra "ttn "i*;'nZiiffifi;"rt *d *. I,tirma.Ia. Dcatl2r; .togi"i ifrrg; $a@ of tunjagtzz; PY Ap-anfinents crrs Ltd. :,s. Mintctpal corporution "i Mumbaitzs; state oJ A.p. us. D. Raghurant ierstui;r;;;;;it*, sain Bhagat and. oth-ers ,.r. Direcior, Eearth serzrlces, ioryro, and otlurs; s,,tya par Anand. as. dto,t o! M.p and othel$zs; Rashtra Dalita seuq. sangho,m, Irgderabid. as. coflector and, District Maglstratc, rrgderd.bad. anZ othersr26; Mohinder singh ry41 through r-Rs wtd. others us. Naratn singh and oth.er"i-rr; fuddam Ramulu us. Jolnt Coltector and, o{hers128; tlmodeut Nambiar us. Thmara.sseri Roman catholic gf.,ssssl2el Panduranga vethal Keute as. Bharat sq.nchar rfrgam Limited. qnd anotherlso; shri Mukund. Bhavan Tfitst and ors. us. shrimant chhatrapati trdagan Rqie pratap singh Marurcj Bhonsle and .,notheflst' s. Titttprihi n o is. m. Ltngamaiah and. othersla2; HMT Ltd os. pulrajnyss. 31. In reply, the learned Senior counsel Mr. Harender pershad, reiterating his submissions has submitted that Section 37A was inserted in the Tenancy Act, in the year r9s5 including all the tenants in possession as deemed protected Tenants. If the totar area of the land owned by the randowner including the rand under the cultivation of tenant is more than family holding and admittedly, the names of the tenants and their forefathers were incorporated in the "'12olo; l5 scc 207 ''o12oto;8 scc 3s3 l''{zot t) 8 sCC 249 (paras 43, 50, 5t) "'(20n) il scc 396 "t120t214 scc 689 "''12012'y 8 scc 584 '" AIR 20 l6 Supremc Court 4995 "'zN4 SCC oniine Ap 2gg '"ciuil Appeal No.i828 of z0r7 dated 14.03.202i of, Hon.ble Supreme court "' 20 t9 (z j nlrrsct laz ',ln^{zozz) 7 scc bo (paras t2 & l3) rr0 order of l{on'bre supreme courr in sLp (c) Diary No. 5623012024 '-'Urvrt Apoeal No.l4BO712024 of l{on.ble Supreme Court "'2024 scb ontine sc 1764 '"2024 SCC online sc 2614 67 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch Tenanr:y Register prep.ared under Section 37A in the year 1958 and the alleged surrendEr or compromise does:rot abridge the right or privileges of any tenant under any usage or law or arising out of any contra,:t, grant decree or order of the Court. Therefore, the alleged surrender contrar5r'to provisions of Section 19 does not bind the tenants and the sale deeds execution in violation of Section 38D of the Tenancy Act have no legal sancti$r and non-esf in law. It is further submitted that I(astopa Corporation, who is the vendor of the respondents in categorical terms admitted that there are Protected Tenants over the lands in Sy.Nos.s1, 52 and 53 of Gachibowli Village and there was no surrender of these lands before any of the authorities and admitted facts need not be proved as pcr Scction 58 of Indi:rn Evidence Act, more particularly, when the llndings of facts, recordr:d by this Court in Writ Petition and Writ Appeal arc binding and n,) person can dispute the record of the Court and the presunrption has to be drawn that entries madc in thc orclers o[ the Court reflect the true nature of records, in the absencc of qtrcstioning the sarne. The learned Senior Counsel further submittcd that when the tenants have disputed that they have not executcd thc szrlc deeds in favour of the respondents herein, the Joint Collcctor t'ommitted error irr deciding the validity of the said sale deeds ancl it is only the competent Civil Court aftbr examination of the evidence, can declare _____..f.Tffir.: 68 CVB&J CRP No.5279@16 & Batch ['i :'-"+- :ii ,, the validity gr otherwise of the sale Uansactions and prayed to allow the Revisions Petitions, confirm'ing the orders of the RDO: : RELE\IANT PROVI$OIYS:

32. Before considering the above submissions, it is apt to refer ,0" object of the Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950;ii1 formerly known as the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Ar5a) Tenancy and Agricultural tqnds Act, 1950. This Act was enunciated to regulate the relationship between the landlords and tenants, deal with the rights in or over the lands, land tenures, collection of rents, transfer and alienation of agricultural land. The State legislature with a taudable object as part of ggrarian reforms enacted the Tenancy Act, providing various provisions for transfer, alienation of agricultural land and for other altied purposes. tlefore discussing r e laborately with regard to inter se disputes of the partie s, the relevant provisions of the Tenancy Act, are extracted hereundcr: .Section 79 - Tertnlnation of tenancg (1) Notuith,stordirrS atty dgr@flent or usage or atLA decr<:e: or order of a Court of laut; bttt subj*t to the provisiotts of sub-secliort (-)) to tenancg of land sltall be termiluted beforc the eryiration of the penod for which the land is lea,sd or demd. to be le.osed. otterwise than (ct) bg the tenant bg surrat15j3;r."q[Jps t@s to the larrdholder atleast a month before the ammenrement of tle gear: Prouided tlnt 5.tch surrender i,s mode bg the tenant rrt wnting and ts admitted bg him before and. is made in good faith to ttte sQtisfaction of the Tatsildar; or Prouided furt?ter that uhere the land. is qtltiuated ytirttLtl by loint tenants or members of an undiuided Hindu famyty, ynless t/te' -surrplder rs ,,!?49 69 CVBR,J CRP No.5279DOl6&Barch bg all of tlem, it shal-l be ileffdiue in reppect of sttch joint tenonts a,s hante riot joined in thi ogfimtion for stiende4 irespectiue of the fart t ut tle rutmes of all tle joint tenants are not mentioned in tle ertifimte; ftt) by the landlolder on a gruund specifid in sub-sedion (2). (tl) The landlalder mag termirtde a tenoncg on tle ground. thrrt tle teirant kt) (i) ltos failed to pag in ang gear, within fifieen dags from tte day fixed urder tle Andlwa Prodesh (telongana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317F. for the pagmenl of the lo.st instalmert of llbnd reuenue due for tle land anerned in ttwt gear, tle rent of anch la nd. for tlwt gear; or (it) if an application for t*rc determilution of reasonable rent is perding befofe the Tribunol.or tte @lledor under *ction 17, ll.r.s failed to deposit uithin 15 dags from tte aforesaid dnle with the T?ibunal or tle, Collector, as the cose mag be, a s'um eqtal to the amaunt of rent u.thich he would have been liable to pag for tlut year if ra such opplication ha.d. been nnde; or (iii) in case tle reasonable rent determined under Section 17 is higler than tle sum deposited bg him" tu.s faitd to pag tte balance due from him within two montls from the date of the decision of the Tribunal or ttrc Cbllectnr, a.s the ca.se mag be; or (tt h;a.-s done'any act which is destructiue or lrerrnanentlg injurious to the km.d; or (c:lltns sub-diuided the land; or (cU tws sublet tle land or failed to anltiuate tle land personallg, or has assigned any interest therein; or (eN lrla.s used suchland.for apurpose other ttwn agricttlture; Provided that' rw tenancy of anA land held bg a tenant shall be tenninated on any of the grounds mentioned in this sub-section unless tle landholder giues s* months, notie in writing intimating his decisron to terminate tte tenarlcA qnd tlrc grounds for such tenninqtion: and Prouided furlher that the tenancy of a tenant who (ct) is afemale or a minor; or (tt)is subject to physical or mental disability; or (cN is serving in ttrc Naval, Military or Air Forces of India, slnll not be determined on the ground onlg that ttte land compised in the tenancA has been sublet by or on behalf of suchtenant. (!l) The tenancy of a tenant lalding a lea.se to which Section 3(7) or 8 applies sha.ll terminate ki &v,c) ftt) uhere the landtalder is a person ula, hauing serued in the Naual, Iv.tilitary or Air Forces of India, in good faith reqtires the land for personal ailtiaation on the termination of such seruice, on the expiration of the year ''S'r, 70 CVBR.J CRP No.5279l2016 & Barch a\ in uhich s-ttchprlrsll,i. giues*tietnuin'tittg to the tenant thot the tenancg isterminotd or . ,: (b) on the frrg, dag of Marct\ 1951 in a oa.se in whiih a person deemed. under Sielcflion 34 tobe a protded tenant is entitled under Section 36 to reoouer prcssession of fu lantd onthar dag. Sectlon 3O - Sttb4ttilslcit4.sublettfitg and asslgnment prohiblted (1) No sub4iuision or atblating of ang land by a tenant and no assignment of ang intercst leld. bg atenan$ shall be valid. (2) Nofiaithstanding angth@ qntoind in sub-section (1) it shall be lautful for a tenant tO be a nemher of a C-aoperative Farming Societg, and as srrch member ta stbl$ asslgtC mortgoge or create a chorge on fus intere.st in the tanaUfotntr of sttctt societg. Section 32 - kudute of taklng possession (1) A tenant or an ogdculfural labourer or artisan entitled to possessiorr o.f ang land. or duellittg ttouse under any of the provisions of this Act mag applC to tle Talsildar in uriting in ttrc prescribed fonn for such possessroa (2) No landlulder slull obtainpossession of any land or clwellirtg lrcuse held by a tenant *qt under anr ord.er of the Tahsildar, for wluch he stwll applg intle prcw .ibd.fonn- (3) On reeipt of an applidionund.er sub-section (I) or sub-section (2) the Tatsildar shall, a$er holding. on erquiry pass such order tlere.on os lte deemsfit. (4) Ang person ta{dnglpossesston of any land or dwelling hottse otlu'rLnst; than in amrdane uttth tle prcvisions of stb-section (l) or strb .sccftort (21, as the case mog be, shall, urithout prejudice lo hrs lrcilnhtg to tlte penaltg proutdd. in Serfion 96 be liable to forfeitur<; of the crops, tl crrrtl. groun on tle land. to the pagm,ent of sttch costs cs nraq be' autartlt'rL ltr.t the Tahsildar or bg the @lledor on appeal from the Tahsilcktr Sestion 33 - Act, ttot b.$fect rlgrtts or privileges of tenant under ang other law Saue as prouided in gb-*ion (1) of Sechbn 30, notlwt<1 cantatrt<:d tn this Act shall be on$ruedto Uinit or abridge the nght or pnt,il<'qe:s of uttLl tenant under ang u,sage or laut for the time being in for<:e or Qnsutq oul ttJ' ang controct, grat$ M"orot&r of a Court or otlerwtse lowsoet'er Section 37 - Pet:s,ons not entltled. under Section 34 deemed in certnin clratmstances to be protected tenants (1) Euery person ulu aitle &mmene^ent of this Act holds as tenant any land in respet of uthidt no person is deemed to be a protected tenant under tiqtian 34, shall, on tlrc expiration of one yectr from such commenceme* "" finry."ylall claiXts by any ,fir"Nr"rton tn 71 cvBR"J CRP No.5279 l2O I 6 & Batch be demd. under Sr;cl;ion 34 to be a protc-ted tenant in resped of sticlt land, whibteuer is later, be deemed to be a protidEd tenantt in respect of su:h land unless the landholder hrls before ancy't etqbgtion or firul rej,.*tion as qforesaid ma.de an qptication in tlte preqiben form to the Ta,h.sildar for a declaration tlut s-uch person i.s not a prctected tenant: Prr'vided that where tle londtolder is a mirwr or a peraon senting in the Naval, Mititary or Air Fores of India" he slwll moke the application for dalaration before the expiry of one gear ftom the date on uhich tlw mhtor rzttairs majority, of ttw landholder ceo,ses to sente in the Naval" Milttary or Air Forces of India: Provided furTher tl'o,t where the landlalder is a person pemunedlg inazpable of cttltivating tte land bg reason of mental di.sabiHtg, tle person wha succeeds to tle land on tle death of tlrc said. landlaldcr slwll malce the application within one year from tle date on uthich le succeeds to the land.. F,xplanation: Where the land is held urtder morc thon one ioint lanltalders the last two provisions st:ar;.lt' not q.ptg unless sr,rclr la nlholders are subject to a disability spectfied in tle.said prouisos. (2) f afier enquiring in the prescribed monner inrr- srch applimtion" tle Tahsitdar refuses to make such declaration and. hi.s decision irs not set asille by the Collector on first oppeat or by tlw fuard. of Reuenae on second appeal. tle tenant shall be deem.ed to be a protbdd. tenant. (31 'lhe rights as a protected tenant of a person deemd.under stbsedion (l) or sub-section (21 to be a protected. tenant sholl be rearded in tte Reccrd of Rights or. where there is no Reard of RQlXs, in such villaSe rex.,rd as may be prescnbed Section 37A-Persons holding lqnds as co'rl'mencement ol the Andhrq Prad.esh (Tilangaru, Areal Tenancg rrno!. Agrl.c-ultural La.nds (Amendtnentl Act, 7955 tn be deemcd, to be protected tenants tenants dt Pers:ons holdirtcl lrrrrds os tenants of tte corurlen@n ent of tle Andlva Praclesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and. Agrianlturol Lands (Arnendment) Act, 1955 to be cleettrecl to be protected tenants (l) Ilotwithstanding anythirrg contqined in this Ad, euery person wla al the contmencentent of the A.P. (T.A.) Tenancg and. Agrianltural Lards (AmendnrcntJ Ac:t, 1955 holds as tenant ang tand in resped of uthich le is n<tt deenrcd to be a protected tenant under this Act, slull be dremed to be a proteclecl tenant if the total area of tlrc land ouned bg tle laruiholder incluclirtg the lqnd under the caltivation of his tenants is more tLnn three times the area of a familg ltolding for the locn.l area @n@rnet Prouided tltat notlttrrg in thts section shall affed, the rights of ang otler pers?n who already holds a protected tenancg certifiente in respect of such land or whose rights as protected tenant are under iruestigation befo:e a competent authontg, if such other person applies to tte Tribunal for :;afeguarchng ltts rights within a period of six montls from the 72 . CVB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch om|ne_nemefi of tle Ardhru Pradesh (Tetangaiu Area) Tenancy and Agxiatlfinal Lands (Amenfunent) Ad, lgSS. @ rhe rbhrs a,s a proteaed tenant of a person deenied. under gtb-section (1) to be a prctedd. tenont slutt be reorded in the Record. of Rigtxs or, where tlere is ta Rwrd of RQhts, in stctt uittage reard.-as inag be prescribed sectlon 38a ' hocedurc utl'cn rea,sonable price is a.greed. to betuteen the lo;ndlulder and. ptotected tenornt Procedure uhen rea,snable price is agreed to between the landltotd.er and protected.tenant If in resp*t of a land. held bg a protrcted ternnt the tand-hold.er ansents to sell his interest in the land, to the protrcted. tenant and the rea.sonable orie pagable tlerefor bg tle prctected tenant is agreed to betueen them, the prouisions oJf szrb-sec (7) of *c. 38 stnlr not applg to such sale, and. eitler the landlalder or the grotected. tenant or ao*iitntly, may applg to the Tribunal ard. thereupon alt tle prouisions o;f sub-set. 1s1, tat iii of *uf sectron sholl applg mutatis mutandis to iuch apptication: Provided tlu, tle reasonable prire so agreed to bg tlrc par7lies tlrcmselues slull be deemed to be tle rea,sonable prie detennined.-by the Tribunat for tle purpoxs of the sanZ sub-sections (S),.(6) and. (g): houided furtler that if tle landlwlder does not sell the whole of the tand held. bg him but retains som.e land with him" tle ertent of the land. remaining with lim afier the purcltase of the land bg the protected tenantt, uthetler to aitiuate it personailg or oth.erwise, shall not be less than tlrc area of a bosic lolding for tte local orea concemed.: Provided also tlwt tle righr of the protected. tennnt stntt be limited to the e.rtent of three famil-g ltoldings in the local area concerned irtclucling the land., if ang, owned bg the protected tenant. sec'tion 388 - Procedure uhen landholder q.grees to relinquish his rfgfts lnfatnur of the prctected. tenant. If in respect of a land tatd bg a protected tenant, the latvl-ttolcler conerned. intends to relinquish his interest in the land witlrout rece:iuirtg any cortsiderqtion tlerefor, ttrc prouisions o-f sub-sec. (z) of sec. 3g shalt rat applg to such a cas,e and the landtader mag apply to the 'l'nbunal and therertpon tle Tribunat shall issue to such protected. te)tant a certifiute so far as mag be o,s prouided for in sub-sec. (6) oJ Secttort -)g. Provided tttot tlv right of the protected. tenant and. the grant of tlrc certifiate shall be limited to the ertent of tlrc three familg hitaings in tle lou.l area ancenrcd including the land, if ang, otaned.bg the protected, tenant and tltat ang excess ouer si.tch ertent shall uest in ine Gouenmtent free of all rQht of tle said protected tenant: Prouided furtler that if tle land.tatder does not relinquish the u,ltole. of the land held bg him but retains some land. with him, the extent of the f:

7.3 CVBR.J bnp No.szzsrzot6 & Batc{r r land remain@ with him afier the relirqui,shryent, uhetler ts aitiuale it perconallg or otteruti.se,'shall nat be lass fhaa tle oren of abqsic ltoldirtg fortlrc lrnl areaanemed. Ser:tlon g8D - Ptpcedure when tqndholder tnir.,nas tp sell'tirra U o pruttected tenant (1) $ the landlalder al any time intends to sell the land hel{ bg tle proiected tenant, he shail gtue a notice in writing'of his intention to s:.tch protected tenant and offer to sell the land to him- Id @.se tle protected tenant intends to purchase the land he shatt intfutde in utritittg his rea,Ciness to do so within 2s* months, from the date of tle reeipt'of sttch nohe. If tlrcre is any dispute about the reasodahle ptlcr pagable bg tte prc"t.ected tenant for the land, the prouisiors of sab-sedtotts (3)'to (8),of Sechbn 38 shall apply mutatis mutandis. (2) If the protected. tenant does not eterci'se tte rigltt of puitnaA fn ,=r;.r,"u io the notice giuen to him bg tte tandhblder.wds stib'se-btion (1) ,;uch protected tenant shall forfeit his riglt of ptttrn-lu* of tlTQ.sanc and the landtatder shalt be entitled to sell sl.tdtlattlt4 arry othei persoru On .;uch a purchnse bg any oth.er persory the prctdedbunn slullfqteit atl ttis rights in the land. saue those prouided for in Wn 4I. Section 388 - ownership oJ lands ,Eld W prtrlint i t*n"rr* t" stand transfeted to themfrom a notltied dde :. . Owrership of land.s held by protected tenants to stqnd ,WrW1errcA to tltent frorn a rwtified date (l) tlotu,itltstanding anything rn this Chapter or tny:Iqw-;for the tilne being in force or anA custom, usage, Ttdgment, dfree, eiltad or grant to tlte controry, the Governtnent mag, bg notificcttion in tlp Attdlua Praa|esh Gazette, declare in respect of anA atea and.ftom snclr date iz"s may be specrfied therein, that ownership of at[tand.s fuild b,g-ptotrcted tenants tuliclt they are entitled to purchase from tleir lnndlOld.ers in suct. area under any prousion of this Chapter shall, sttbjd to tle cona'itiorr laid doutn in sub-secttort (7) of kction 38, startd tr.ansfM. to and uest irt ttrc protected tenants lnlding them and. ftom arch date the prot<:ctecl tenants shalt be de.emed to be the full owners of sttchlrinds: Proudecl tl(fi u,here in respect of ony such lanil ony ptoendhg under Sec. I 9 <tr Sectton 32 or Section 44 is pending on the dale q notifiefi, the tran:;fer of ownership of such land shall take effd, on tle daten on uthich such proc<teclirtg is finally decided, and when tle tettant retains poss?-s-sron <tf the land tt <tr,cordance with tle Msion in such proc<'edrrr<1 Explorrcttiorc If a protected tenanl, on account of his being di,strnssessed otherwise than in the manner and by order of the Talta;ildar as prcvided in Szctron 32, is not irt possession of the land. on the .date of the notificatort issued hereundel then for the purposes of tle sttb-sdion, such protected tenant sholl, notwrthstanding ang iudgment, deuee or orcler of any Court, or the order of the Board of Reuerue or Ttibunal or otlter aullt<tntg, be deemed to have been holding tlte land on the date of I It^ I i i I : 74 CVB&J CRF No.52792016 & Barch tl'e ttotifimtioru a2d. actnrdhqlg, the rahsiaar sltoil ratwitttstanding ongthing untained in the satd- *ctun sz, e*ner i-i"a, or on the yettntiyn of *e protected tenant t-Id ;A"rrr*4""*;r* ,;'d;; land rn.possessron of tte randhorder ir-iifroon craiming tlttottgh or under.him in that ono, tt-lt o. iii possessron oyf the lantdltolder or xtch person, as'the ccrse mag be, and sr&tt be r*tored. to the prct*ted tenant and. tte provisions ir tru" "air:" sratt apptg tlere-to tn 9uery resp. ect gs if tte protected. tenant had. t*td. the rand. on the date of suchnotifiation- r-i"t[i 'nt.ft (2) A certificate in the prescribedform declaring him to be o,tner stwtt be r'ssued bg the Tribunar afier noding sucn "nq;irg "r-rr*o-;" prcsuibed, simultaneousrg be issued to te tand.ratder. srrii, *rtiir*t" slun be condusiue euidence of t_he protectd- tengnt- rtoving o"*ii-tt e ouner of Ito .l*'-d- with elfect from the d.ate of the certifiute as agoinst the landlaWer and all otlter persons hauing'ang int"ri"t-ilrt Prouided th,,t where the ran| the ounership . of which rtas been transfened to the protected tenant under ""L-iikin-til, * in the oatpation of a person other. than ile protected. tenant i r.u", of the certifiate rbsued under this sub-seciron o stutt ie- tawyut for the Talstldar to restore the possession of ile said t"na ti--ito prct&ed. tenant or lwlder of to the .1tu oeupant thereof, in tLe prescribed. marutei"; (3) wthin ninetg d-ays from tt. d.ate of nolcg of issue of *e ertifimte under_sub-secfron (2-), euerg rand.hotdlr of rand.s situated in fie area specified in tte notification ind.er sub-sect{on ul, sniiiie an oppttcation before the Tribunai for the aeterminaiin of ite ,"o"iiraL prie of his interest in tte rand which ho,s been t ansyenia io li1ir".ot*, or o ptotected tenant under sub-section (r), and.if a '-t sofired utithin such period by the rqndhotder, the Tribunat mag suo motu prowd. to de-termine such pnce.and. thereupoa att *e pr""*ii"ir'sub-secs. (4) to (8) of *ctiort 38 shail ntutatis mitandis apprg to Prouided that if the protectecr tenant commits defaurt in respet of ang instalment, it shail b7 rlcouered bg the Gouemient as aiJars of tand reuenue and. paid to ttre lancllwlcler: ertificate, afier gtuittg ,_di ii "ppu*lii oppti.otiora "iriaUn "u"n Provided funher that if trLe whore or any part of the price due to fie londlalder @-nnot be recouered. as arreais.iy u"a ,.r"iii, *o tansfer slwll not be effectiue anct rhe amount, if'ang, "i;;"dy';"id. bg t^e protected tenant toutard.s the price shall be-refuid"d. to hiin [ogether uith interest at three per cent pcr annum and the i";i;;";";; oio uo n i, ,{ any, afi.er deducting tlrcrefion the rent for the period. (4) The Gouernment ma!, for trrc purpose of gtuing effect to tte prouisions of this section by rures, ,,mie such supplementat, incid.entat and ansequentiar prouisiorts as theg may d.eem n".o"rry,--i7ch as the proedure for making inqutry to ascertiin the extent ,t ii" iiai"g of the tenant as on the nottfiecr crate and the extent of the rand which is to be deemed to haue been transferred to and uested'in th" ;;;.;t"d tenants,,. (-. 75 CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch (Sl Notwitltstanding anything antainel. in this sedion or Srrfion 79, tle Aille*or mag, suo motu at ang ttme, hold an enquirV uitn i"vteut.'A a:;ertain the genuineness of the'surender of tle right.made bg tle protated tenant under claase (a) of sttb-sedion (1) of @ion 79, for tle plnpose of affecting the, transfer of oumership under this sedion" and. pcrss such order in relationtlrcreto o1 lrc mag thinkfit: Prouided tlwt no order adverselg alfircting ang person shall be passd under the sub-section unless such persr,n llr.s had an o$porfunitg or mttking his rep resentation tlereto". Se'ctlon 89 - Procedure o;ad. pouers a,ttnqulties (1) Tf,e provisions of *cfions 149 and. 150 of tle Andlva Pradesh (te,langana Area) Lo.nd Reuenue Act, 1377 F shall qply totle rwrding of euiderte and of decisions at inqriries held. wtder this Ae. (2) For the purposes of ang such: inqthg. the Tahsildar, Tlibruml and. Col.lector may exercise all or any of the powers anfened on Ciuil &urt bg tlu' C;ode of Ciuil Procedure, 1908 including tle power to award crlsts Sa:tion 9I - Reulsions Notwithstanding anything antained rn tfu's Act or antg otler law for tle time being in force, an application for revision slrr.lt lie to tle Htgh C,ourl fton any final order passed on appeal by ttte Collector or Board of Reuenue on the following ground.s: (a) that tle original or appellate autltority exercised a jurisdidion not uested in it bg law: or (b) tlwt tte original or appellate autlwritg failed to excrcise a jurisdiction so vested; or (c) in following tte procedure or passing the order, the originat or app,ellate authority acted illegallg or with material ilregulafitg. Sectlon 92 - Powers exerclsqble on altpeal or ranlslon An autlwritg exercisirtg appellate or revisional juisdiction urtder this Act shall pass suclt orde-r consistenf with this Act, whether bg wag of anlTrmation, recessron or modiftcation of tte order under appeal or revi.sion, as appears to it to be just, and shall luue the pouers anfered on the origirtctl authority by sub-section (2) of *ction 89. Section lO2 - Act not to appls to certo;ln lands and areas Notldng in this Act -s/rcl/ apply- (a) to lands leaserl, .clranted, a.lienated or acquired in fawur of or by tle Ceniral Gouentrnent or the State Gouernnent a local autltorifu or a C.o- operatiue Societg: Prouided that rrctlurtq in tlu's clause slnll opplg to Inam"s, lottds dealt with under Chapter VI and to such other lands cB mag be prexribed; 76 cvB&J CRP No.5279I20 16 & Batch r) (o) to tgrtds hew. on leose with tlue prmission of tle c-olwor. for tle 'UeneSt of anindtstr*zt and commercial undcrtaking; . ' (c) to xrude Inam land.s; (Q tb Inans lald bg religious or cluritable irstitutions; or (e) to any area which @uernment mag, from time to tim.e, bg n4tificrd,ion in the Otrtciol Gozette specifq as being reserued for urbanl nrlzt.' agriaiAral or industial d.evelop ment. 0 to tonds leld bg ang Corporation established. bg or unfur a @ntral or XoutttCialor State A6/., or ang Gouernment Compang as defitedin**tion 617 ofthe Companies Act. 1956. (g) to ang agrintltural land betonging to or giuen or endoutd. for tle prrrpon of any charitable or Hindu Religious Institution or erdoumcnl a,s -defined. bg tlte prouisions of the Andhra Pradesh clnritable and Hinilu Religious Insfitufibns and endowments Act Sectlon 7O4 - Act to preaail ouer other enactments Thi.s Act and ang rule, order or nottficatton madeor r'ssued thereunder slult ftaue effed notuithstanding anAthing inmnsi.stent thereutith a nninea in aig otler enactment with respect to ntp;tters eruurterdd in List fi in the seuenth schedule to the constitution of India or in ang instttunent hauinS effect by wrtue of any such other enoctment-'

33. The Hon',ble Apex court vide order dated U7.L2.2OLO, allowed Civil Appeal No.305 4 of 2()O6and batch and remanded the matters to the Division Bench of this Court framing certain points for consideration and permitting ot.hcr points to be urged as well. On remand, the Division Bench of this Court, by a common order dated

25.02.2013, disposed of CRP No. 6708 of 2OO3 and batch, answerkrg certain issues. Since some issues required further examination rryon verification of records, the maltcr was remanded to the Original Authority/Revenue Divisional Oflicer (RDO) for adjudication of the lis between the parties. The purpose was to give a quietus to the litigation arising out of declarations filed the CoAH Act, 1973 runder 77 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch by M/s.Ka"top" Corporation (verrdo,r of the respondents), limiting the claim o:: the tenants to an ortent of Ac.36.25-guntas ih Sy.Nos.s1, 52, and 53 of Gachibowli Vi!!rye. Th9 observati,ons made thereunder were confined to the extent of rights,of the tenants and the landlords, and their subsequent purchasers and validity of the surrender of the lands under the provisions of the Tenancy Act. The Division Bench in Paras 93 and 94 observed that the determination of Issues I to 4, 6, 9, and LO framed by the llonble Supreme Cor+rt is closety tinked to the core question of whetirer the petitioners in C.R.P.No.67O8 of 2OO3 are protected tenants and Whether the respondents therein have any right, tir-le, or interest in Sy.NoS.Sl to 53, which they claim to have purchased. It was further observed that there are also several other issues rvhich are mentioned (on which the competing contcntions wcre re(:orded but not the, conclusions), which require analysis and resoltrtion. The contentions raised by both sides higtrlight thc complexiry involved, making it difficult for this Court to acllutclicatt: rhem wir-hin the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction undcr Scctiot-t 92 of thr: Tenancy Act.

34. This Court, after a careful examination 6[ the pleadings, documentary evidence, and the rival contentions, proceeds to determine the issues framed as follows:

35. Issne No.al Whethcr 78 . ., ..:. i,*j.* e.o..Us. cvBR J cRP No:52792016 & Barctr 11 No.783 MA dL24.3.2OOO tssued under ttte A.P. llrban Areqs (DeoelopmenQ Act" 7975 nottfglng tltc subject lands a,s "resldentlal ttseu the jut*dtctton of tlrc o:uth;arities under tle Tenancg Act tn the to,lcr;s autag "rrne light of Sec. 1O2(e) of tlrc Tenancg Act? Findinqs of the RDO: The RDO held that the petitioners have been in possession of the subject lands as tenants since 1950 and therefore, they have acquired vested tenancy rights. These rights, being pre-existing, cannot be divested merely due to the issuance of G.O.Ms.No. f 83 dated 24.O3.2OO0. Accordingly, the issue was decided in favour of the petitioners. Findinqs of the Joint Collector: The Joint Collector opined that once the land is notified for residential use under G.O.Ms.No.183, it ceases to be agricultural land under the Tenancy Act., 1950. In such a case, Section 102(e) bars the application of the Tenancy Act, and the authorities under the Act lose jurisdiction. Hence , the RDO's conclusion was held to be incorrect and was set aside. t a) :79 CVBR,J CRP No.5279 t2O I 6 & Batch !*lndinqs of thts @:u-rt:,. 'l'he Tenancy Act, 1950 ,i*" il*: "rrIcld ' . '. ,o ,"grlate the relationship betwee:r landowners and tenants. This Act aimed at agrarian reform, was de,signed to establish a socialistic pattern in society and governs .i. ,,. the trarrsfer, alienation, and possesiior, of agricultural lands. It falls under tlntry 18 of List II, and is well within the legislative competence of the Sitate. Under tJ:e provisions of the Act, if a landowner seeks to regain Jrossession of land.from tenant or protected tenant, they must follow the procedure prescribed. Any question regarding whether a person is a protected tenant or ttre surrender of tenancy rights can only be adjudicated under the provisions of the Act. The relationship <rf landklrd and tenant is a sfne quatwn for invoking the provisions of this legislation. Section 5 of the Act provides that a person lzru'tully cultivating the land belortgrng to another shall bc dccmccl to bc a tcn.int, unless the land is being personally cultivate(l by thc lzrnclholcler. Prior to the ambndment of Section 19 (viric Arnendment Act No.3 of 1954, Rrblished in Andhra Pradesh ()azette fi.xtrerordinary No.29, dated 4.2.19541, the surrender o{' tcnancy could tre rrral. After the amendment to Section l9 r.r,.c.l'. 04.O2.1954, surrcnder must be in writing and admitted beforc ttrc 'lzr]rsildar. In the arbserrce of such surender, the tenant continucs to h:rvc right to rccover the possession. F\rrther; Section 33 of the Act clarifies that 3 .t$ 80 CVB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch except for exceptions curved outiin Section 3O(U of the Act, nothing in the Tenanry Act, shall be constnred to limit or abridge the right or :' privileges of any tenant under any usage or law for the time being in force or arising out of any contract, grant, decree or order of a court or otherwise howsoever. This clearly reflects the legislature's intent that tenants' accrued rights shall not be defeated by subsequent laws or enactments. b) The facts culled out from the orders passed in W.A.No.L42O of 1987 are that the lands in Survey Nos.37, 40, 42, 43, and 47, admeasuring Ac.63-18 gts were recorded in the name of Smt.t ingamma as pattedar. The lands admeasuring Ac.18-23 gts in Sy.No.45, Ac.1l-28 gts in Sy.No.46, Ac.L7-2O gts in Sy.No.5l, Ac.l5- 36 gts in Sy.No.52, and Ac.18-1O gts in Sy.No.53 were recorded in thc name of llyas Burni as per tlre Khasra Pahani for the year 1954-55 (Khasra Pahani is prepared under Regulation Xltt under Hydcrabacl Land Revenue Regulations). The total extent of land holdings of Ilvas Burni was Ac.157.O3 gts forming part of various survey numbcrs including the subject survey numbers of Gachibowli Village. Aftcr enforcement of the Tenancy Act, entries in the Tenancy Register r,r'crc merde in two spells i.e, 1951 and 1958, recording 13 names jointly as tenants under Sections 34 and 37A of the Act. The original parrcdzrr Lingamma executed a registered sale deed vide-docurnent No.31 l, 8r cvBR J CRP No.5279/2O16 &Barch dated t22.O2.135O Fasli, in favour of tlyas Bur.ni. After execution of thd'saft: deed, Lingamma instihrted suit vide O.S.No.1l/1 of 1952'for declaration and injunction over the lands. Pending adjudication of the sairl suit, Section 37A was inserted with effect from 12.03.1956 extending protection to. those found in possession for claiming tenanc5, rights. The suit instituted by Lingamma ended in compromise in A.S..No.2S of 1958, contrary to Section 33 of the Tenanc'rr Act which mandates that any compromise or settlement does not take away the statutory rights of protected tenants. Therefore, any compromise entered by Lingamma, who had already alienated the property in 1940, does not affect the tenancy rights of Protected Tenants since their narnes were continued in the Tenancy Register of the year 1958. c) [n the meanwhile, M/s. Kastopa Corporation has purchased land adrneasuring Ac. 157-03 guntas in Sy. Nos. 37, 40, 42 Lo 47, 51, 52, and 53 situated at Gachibowli Village, under registered sale deed dated 0'.2-09-1961 bearing Document No.25OO of 1961 from the legal heirs oI Late Ilyas Burni. Further, Kastopa Corporation also purchased land admeasuring Ac.33-14 guntas in Sy.Nos. 35, 36, and 5O unde'r registered sale deed dated 28-09-1964 bearing Document No.498 of 1964 from the legal heirs of Late Ilyas Burni. The purchas,:r Kastopa Corporation liled declarations under the 82 CVBR.J CRP No.527912016 & Batch r) provisions of coAH Act,:1973;'which came into force on ol.ol.l973. The alleged surrender of tenancy rights in fiavour of Lingamma lacks legal sanctity since she had lost all proprielary rights in 1940 and the records do not show arry written surrender in accordance with Section 19 of the Act. In the copy of Tenancy Regist-er liled along wittr material papers at Pg.No.8o7, it was mentioned that as ordered in File No.A3/2o46o/64 dt.08-02-196s the n€unes of the prorecred Tenants have been deletCd over Sy.tlos.60, 61, 63, ro3 to t0s, 106, 1o9, 127 and, 128. Further it was also mentioned that legal heirs of P.T i.e, G.Pochaiah, G.Yellaiatr, G.Ramulu, G.Anjaiah and G.chandramma have been accepted and deposed in their statcments and agreed to surrender the rights before the Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), serilingampally. Accordingly, their narnes were delerccl irr p.T Registcr i.e, Sri G. Yellaiatr recorded in P.T Register of Cizrchiborvli Village against Sy.No.115 to an extent of Ac.1-19 gts vide Pror.t'r:rliirgs No.t3l 1378199 dated 30.09.1998 of MRo, Serilingampall_v. Thr: szrir.l copv of P-T Register does not disclose any written ancl ildrniticc{ surrcnder. Further, the tenants themselves filed an application ttcfore thc l'ahsildar in File No.A4 125561Lg66 (referenced in thc al'llclavit of the District collector in W.A;Ns.l42o of l987l, whcrein ir lv.rs clarified that the alleged surrender dated 16.10. 1966 rclarcs r.o Sy.Nos. I to 5, 7,8, L2,23, 30, 31 to 43,47,50,62,69,2O,72 Lo 75, 78,79,82 to 87,93,96 tn LO2, 111, 113, 118, l2O,_122, 123 and (-', 83 CVBRJ CRP No.527912016 & Batch L26 of (iachibowli village. Significantly, there was no rgference to Survey Irtos. 5 L,52, and 53 of Gachibowli Viltage d) In terms of the provisions of CoAH Act, 1973, a provisional list of protec:ted tenants was prepared under Rule a(1) of the Rules, for which the tenants filed an Objection Petition dated t7.Og.L975 before the ta.nd Reforms Tribunal claiming that they are in possession and enjoymerrt of the lands in Sy.Nos .37, 40, 42, 43, 4+, 45, 46, 47, 5L, 52 and 53 admeasuring Ac.I57.03 gts situated at Gachibowli Viltage. Based on the Land Reforms Tribunal's proceedings, protected tenanry rights were recorded in the P.T. Register prepared under Section I}TA of the Act. Due to the absence of a proper and valid surrender procedure post- 1954, the alleged surrender which is not in-conformity with Section L9 does not extinguish the tenants'rights. e) While the matter stood thus, on 2O.O4.L979, the Government issued G.O.Rt.No.594 granting lcasc over a portion of the land to Maharshi Institute. Questioning the same, the tenants liled W.P.No.4l59O of t98O and the same was disposed of vide order dated

17.O2.19t1I directing the RDO to submit a report. Seeking implementation of the report of thc RDO, W.P.No.4O59 of 1981, carne to be lilerl and the same was allorved vide order dated 15.07. L987 directing lhe respondents thercin to grant certilicates under Section 38-E of Tenancy Act in rcspect o[ lands admeasuring Acs.73.O3 gts 84 W CRP No.5279l2016 cvB&J & Batch and also permitted the petitioners therein to lile apptications under section 38 of the Tenancy Act, before the RDo. Aggrieved by the same, the state fited an appeal uidew.A. No.142o of Lggr on the file of Honble Division Bench of this Cour! and the same was dismissed vide judgment dated 25.01.1993 holding that there was no valid surrender and directed the authorities to examine the tenancy claims- Thereafter, the RDo conducted an enquiry in Fite No.G/364o11996 dated 28.o4.2oo1 and ordered for issuance of Section 38A sale certilicates in favour of protected tenants in respect of lands admeasuring Ac.L7-2o gts in sy.No.Sr, Ac.l5-36 grs in sy.No.S2, Ac.4-ol gts in sy.No.S3 (paike) situated at Gachibowli village. The orders of the Division Bench attained l-rnality as no further appcal was filed by the state and the same is evidenced vide Memo No.23361/L.Ref.II /g3-Ll dated 19.10. Lgg4. The RDo subsequently issued ownership certificates under Section 38E of the Tenancy Act in File No.c/LL88/1993 dated 2s.o4.1995 to rhe exrr:nr of Ac.73.O3 gts out of the total Ac.157.03 gts in Sy.Nos.37,4O,42 Lo 45, Questioning the issuance of ownership certificate s, the Authorized oflicer under the CoAH Act filed appeal beforc thc .Ioint (lollcctor in File No.B4/48O2/L996 and tlle same was disrnissccl on

20.06.1998, confirming the tenancy rights. 85 CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch V/hile.-so, the computation of the lands 04 the declaration filed 0 by Kasr:opa Corporation in C.C.No.W1264lt975 on ttre frlg of Land : Refotrn:s Tribunal was assailed in LRA No.89l 1996 on the file of Land , Reforms Appellate Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District Ju{ge, Rar.rga Reddy District. Aggrieved by orders passed by LRAT, I(astopa Corpora:tion has filed CRP No.3755/ 1997 on the file of this CoUrt and the sanre was disposed of vide order dated O6.11.f998 by setting aside the order under revision and directed to re-compute ttre,hotding of the dr:clarant in respect of lands in Sy.Nos.37, 40, 42, +!,51 t9 53 )' (Cqpy of the order is enclosed as material paper in CRP.No.1588 of 201:7 at Pg.No.86). In pursuancc of the said order, the Land Ri:forms Tribunat re-computed the holdings of the declarant,.and hel{:..that Kastopa Corporation w'ers surplus holder to the e4tent of O,SZSSO i.,.. Standanl Holding (SH; :rncl the LRT vide order dated 26.05.1999 directed the declaranI Ktrstopa Corporation to surreRder the lands in Sy.Nos.46, 47 and 53. ('hirllcnging the same, the tenants filed LRA No.13/20OO before ttre l-RA'l' undcr Section 2O(3) of thc CoAH Act and vide order dateci 29.09.2000 the saicl appeal was alorryed setting .. aside thr: order datecl 2(r ()5. 1999 passed by LRT in CC No.W 1264175 and rem:itted the mattcr to ttrc RDO for fresh disposal to consider the claims ol'protected tenzrnts .rs pcr Section 13 of the CoAH Act. '' 86 cvBR"J CRP No.5279l2016 & B:itch n g) '' -Aggrieved by the inaction of the authorities in disposing the claims, the tenants fited w.P.No.147o8 of 1999 and the same was disposed of directing the atrthorities to consider the application of tenants under section 38A of the Tenancy Act. Thereafter, the RDo passed orders dated 28.04.2oo1 in File No.G/364o/ 1996 issuing sale certificate under Section 38A of the Tenancy Act for the lands in sy.No.51 (Ac.17.20 gts), Sy.No.52 (Ac.15.36 gts) and Sy.No.53 (paike) (Ac.4.01 gts) total admeasuring Ac.37.17 gts and also granted other reliefs. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal vide F2/4go2l2oo1 was filed by the Diamond Hills welfare Association and its members before the Joint collector, Ranga Reddy District, and the same was allowed vide order dated og.l2.2oo1. challenging the said order, the protected tenants frlcd cRP No.670B of 2003 arrd the state filed cRp No.12oo of 20o3. Vide common order dated cRP No.67o8 of 2oo3 was allowed and cRP No.l2oo of 2o03 was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the civil Appeat No.3o54 of 2006 and batch were preferred on the hle of Honble Apex court and the Honble Apex court vide order dated 07.L2.2o [o remanded the matters back to this court to adjudicate on certain specific issues. [n terms of the orders of the Honble supremc court, the Division Bench of this court vide common order dated 25.02.2013 remanded the matter to the RDo to' decide specif-rc issues to the extent of disputed lands admeasuring Ac.36.25 gts in Sy.Nos.S L, 52 and 53 of Gachibowli Village 4nd in the I I I I : i i ): i I \ \ 87 cvB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch said or<ter it was clarified that the remaining extent forming Ac.137.17 gts in Sy.Nos.3s,36, 37,40,42 to 47 end,53 part of Gachibowli Village vested in the State. Thereafter, the RDO passed orders dated 15.1O.2O13 in Case No.G/269O/2OL3 recognizing the tenancy rights to the extent of Ac.42.24 gts in Sy.Nos.sl, 52 and 53 part. On appeal, the said order was reversed by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District vide order dated 24.09.2016 in Case No.F2/5,4OBl2Olg and batch. Challenging the satrne, the present batch of cases are filed. h) The facts referred above would reveal that the dispute between tlre tanctlord (decl arantfKastopa Corporation) and tenants has not attained linality before issuance of the notificalion vide G.O.Ms.No.183 dated 28.O4.2OO0 under the provisions of the Urban Areas (l)evelopment) Act, 1975 classifying the subject lands in Gachibowli as urban area. [t is settled law that unless expressly provided, statute operates prospectively. Therefore, any noti{ication or law altering land use classification in the teeth of Section 33 of the Tenancy Act does not affcct pending proceedings or extinguish tenancy rights. The rights crystallized under the law in force at the time of initiation o[ procccdings cannot be retrospectively nullified and further, the Tenancy Act being benelicial legislation continues to 88 :\S cvB&J CRP No.5279l20t6 & Batch n govern all plnding craims/cases despite the urban development plans. i) The crucial issue required to be examined in this case is with regard to the nature of lands and its classil-rcation. As per the Khasra Pahani for the year r9s4-s5, the nature of lands are recorded in the name of Ilyas Burney as patta lands. As per the circular [nstructions issued by the Government of Hyderabad, revenue notification No.53 dated 24-08.1955 published in Gazette dated 15.09.1955, all ten*rcies governing under the Tenancy Act, lgso have been included in the Record of Rights. As per section 62 of the Terangana land Revenue Act, 1gr7 Fasli (Lgor AD), the colrector is the competent authority to grant permission for appropriating agricultural land to non-agricultural purpose. As per Rule 70 of the Terangana Land Revenue Rules, 19s1, no agricurtural rand can be diverted to any other purpose, without the permission of the collector. The lands which are ceased to be agricultural lands are liable to be pay tax under Non-Agricultural Assessment Tax, 1963 (,NALA Act, 1963J. The NALA Act, 1963 was repeared and rcpraced ,,vith the Terangana Agriculhrral Land (conversion for Non Agrir:ulturar purposes) Act, 2006 ($IALA Act, 2006). The respo.denrs in the revisions i.e, Diamond Hills welfare Association and its mcmbers nor the Kastopa corporation have placed any mate riar obtaining conversion t) 89 cvB&J CRP No.5279DOl6 &Batch permis{iion under the provisions of tfre Acts referred above and in fact, tLre declaration f-rled by Kastopa Co4roration'was computed under the provisions of the CoAH Act, 1973. The LRT vide order dated g.L2.lg75 determined that Kastopa Corporation was a surplus holder of 2.2862 SH. Out of total extent of land adraeasuring Ac.190.17 gts in Sy.N,:s.35 to 37, 40, 42 to 47 and,so to 53, of Gachibowli Village, an exte rt of land admeasuring Ac. lg7.\7 gts in Sy.Nos.35 to 37 , 4O, 42 to 47 and 53 was surrendered by l(astopa on 05-05 -1976 and possession was taken by the State on 13-10 -1g76(As per the findings recorderl by the Division Bench in the common order dated

25.02.2313 at Para No.65), which would *nply demonstrate that the . :,: classil'ication of the lands as on the date of taking possession are not ccasccl to bc agriculture. i j) Tlrc []<rn'blc Supreme Court n Crult Oll @tporo;tion Limited. us. Storte of Telangana's case (supra) while dealing with the classifir',rtiorr of lzrnds under the Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 arLcl Llrban t.and (Ceiling and Regutation) Act, Lg76 (for strort "ULC A<:r, 1976"1 and application of tlre .notifications issued Lhcrt:urr,le r t() thc urban agglomeration, observed as under: "7O. Tlu' lttclqnrcnls relied upon bg Slui &lve such as Urion of Irrtlr;t u. tbrahirrt lJddirt, (2012) 8 SCC 148 : (2012) 4 SCC (Civ) 3621, arrcl [|ira1 u. Surya Pratap, (2020) 10 &C 729 : (2O21, I SCC (Ciu) 301 ere .rct lrclpful to the arguments raised Infad, tllclessees were aware of llte c<trilrouersy in respect of nature of lottd. and.its stafutory q.ncellation, tlrcrefore. the lack of pleadings or tle euidene loses fts significance. Tlrc l9tl7 Act rs <t C-otle in itself prouiding for clo.nstitutbn of tlw Endowntents -- -re 90 CVBR,J CRP No.52Z9@t6& Batctr n -' Tribunar, qpaL revision and.. rctbut. The strbt rup of .prcdue antemptated bg the c-ode of ciu* daii,Tgdii" rcs1rct of pradfiqs and' evi&ne cot^ot ue eien*a ti tt* t riir-i -r*i*r"afor ryecifu prrpose. sinre *e lessees were ?unre of ilefact tt*t ttn Mutt craims fiie tand' to b agrianrfirat t 4d ;,rd -tt"arirgz;;;-" of tte rea,* uas betng ancnd for *te nooi thar fue1""""i-tra uns agrianrturat, therefore, the ressees .*ri,t *-ryr*! .r -,,:iiiiaan of prhrcipres of 'naturar ,cstie or strict rutes or piui^r; i"L"i6*"a undcr the ciuil Wure Code l9og. zr' Infod, this &urt in Nerunari Kanresuaramma v. funtpati sttbba Rao, [1e62 scc onLire sc +ti 1*1g fi*t ;;;;i"" ,r*rtt to triat fuas lvtotting *te riuat case and. iia a ttu euinE it ontg tn apport of tleir antentions but in refutation of those ,it6 iln", side, it *,^ot be absenre of an issue utas yatal to the ca,se. It utas Md. as #:y'tle .5. ... iVo doubt, no rssue was framed, and. fie one, uhich uas haue been more etaS0rate; Lul irnn ile parties uent to triar fulrg po*rng *te riual ca.se ana ii-;r;;" euidene not onru in stpport of their iontentions bu-t in ,"n i*ri- side, it cannot be said tt*t tto iiirri;;;'L:". was fatat to the case' or that *ere was that mbtriat *niin-iti"i"" procedhtgs. we are' *erefore, of opinion that the suit *;i; ;;;" disrussed on thi,s narrow groun'd., a^d. atso that trere * no ,re"i-for a remit, a.s ile erid'enre uthich has been t a i"!i'*" tJZirrr*t""t to reactt *e right conctusion Neither partg craimed o"jor"'ir" *ut it had. ang further euidence to offer."' ;;;,tr;#,;;;:, franted" -cgurd. "f 78' similartg, the argument that the rand now fa,s within firc urban agglomeration in uieta-of the enactm.ent of the uian una g.eiting and. Reguration) A.*'^1?!g ti again not tenabte. Firsttg, the said Act statd.s repealed on 22.3..19??, Srzu nrTher, the mere fact inat tne hnd. has ame ,tithin the municipat timits utourd. not make [ne bna as non-agricttrfitral land' It onlg means that the rand within ,n" iuiiprt rimits can be utilizcd or the buitdings be anstructed. in t"r*, iji-i prouisions of *e Municipal Latus apptiia bte t hereto. 79' sim,arrg, the argument *nt the tand in question fotts with *e hnot Deueropment ptai for Kukatparg a-s per ,n"-'i^^r**tion of *e Hyderabd {Jrban Deuetipment iutnoatg is again not tenabre. Tre hnat Deuelopment plan \ future praining of the d.evelopment of tte area. Thus, in future, the land. u.n .be used onlg acarding b hnat Deuelopment ptan but that does rwt mean.that tti ijaorn rat nature of the land. rtos cea,sed to eist. Therefore, the said c;;municationrs cdso rattenable.,' k) The analysis of the provisions of the UDA Act, tgzs and the provisions of the uLC Act, Lgz6 rnakes it crear that mere fact that land falls within the municipal limits and subsequent change of use ( 9l CVBR,J CRP No.5279D016 &Batch does not affect the rights of thc protected tqng..nts,, F\rrther, Section 38E of the Tenancy Act starts wittr non-obstante clause giving overriding effect of all the provisions of the Act and vesting of the rights in favour of the Protected Tenants, from the date of notilication i.e, 01.()1.1973 subject to fulfilling the conditions under sub-section (7) of St:ction 38 of the Tenanpy Act. Admittedly, no notification was issued trnder Section LO2 (el of the Tenancy Act divesting the accrued rights under Sections 34 and 37A of the Tenancy Act. Further, a conjoint reading o[ Section 33 r/w $ection 104 of t]re Tenancy Act, would amply establish the intention of the legislature that the rights conferred under the Act, shall be construed to li.mit or abridge the rights o:- privileges of any tenant. A summary of the above analysis would mpl)' ttrat G.O.Ms.No.183 dated 28.O4.2OOO is not a notification issued under Section 1O2(e) of Tenancy Act. [t is to be seen thitt ()nce rights have been created under the statute, suctr rights cz:nr1o[ bc clenuded without following the procedure containcd unclcr ttrc 'lcnancy Act. Therefore, it can be safety concluded that G.O.Ms.ltlo.l83 dated 28.O4.2OOO is not applicable to the subjecr lands on tw() folds. Firstly, the tenancy proceedings are pending from the year l9B0 onwards before this Court vide W.P.No.459O of 1980, W.P.No.4059 of 1982 and WA No.1420 of L987 etc., and before thc authoriti:s trnder the Tenancy Act and the issuance of subsequent norificerri:rn vidc G.O.Ms.No. iSS dated 28.04.2OOO cannor. 92 cvBR J CRP No.527912016 & Batch retrospectively nultify the rights. S.$ondly, ''the declaration filed by the Kastopa Co,rporation under the provisions of CoAII Act, 1973 was i: computed and the possession of surplus lands was taken by the State on l3.l0. 1976, after the UDA Act, Lg75 and UI,C Act, 19T6 came into force. The purchasers from Kaslopa Corporation (respondents in revision cases) failed to establish that there was conversion order issued by the Collector for appropriating the agricultural land for non-agricultural purpgse under Rule TO of Telangana Land Revenue Rules, 1951 nor placed any record of payment of Non-Agricultural Assessment Ta:r under the provisions of NALA Act, 1963. The above facts would maniiest that the nature o[ lands are agriculture and protected tenarrcy rights were crystallized by thc ycar 1958 under Section 37-A of the TgnancyAct. Such vesred tenancy rights cannot be divested by a subsequent reclassilication undcr UDA Act, 1975. Therefore, G.O.Ms.No.183 dated 24.O3.2OOO does n()t rctrospectively extinguish protected tenancy rights. The findings ol'rhc .loint Collector to the contrar5r are set aside.

36. lssue No.B] Whether the report of the RDO dated

27.O7.1981 has any value, and whether the RDO has jurisdiction to determine who is the protected teaant under Rule 14 read with Rul e 26 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Rules, 1950? a' 93 CVB&J CRP No.5279DOl6&Batch Findtrss of the RDO: 'Ihe RDO stated that the report dated 27.07.1981 was upheld in W.F'.No.4059 of L982 and- confirmed in W.A.No.l42O of 1987. As no fur{her appeal was filed, the findings have attained finality and are bindin;3 on the Government. Therefore, the matter cannot be reopened. lrindinqs qf the Joiot Collector: T'he Joint Collector clarified that the RDO conducted the enquir5' only on the directions of in W.P.No.45gO/ 1980, and not as' an auttrorit5r under the Tenancy Act. The report is thus only a piece of evidence and not a statr.rtory order. Consequently, the RDO lacked jurisdiction under Rule 14 or 26 to determine protected tenancy, and the RDO's lindings were set aside. Findinqs of thls Court: a) This Court, vide order dated L7.O2.1981 in W.P.No.459O o[ 1980, directed that an enquiry be conducted by the District Collector, Hyderatrad, or any other officer not below the rank of RDO, to ascertai;:r: (i) whether the petitioners therein were declared as protecte'l tenants of the lands in question, including Sy.Nos.46 and a7; $ll trnder what provision and when such declaration was made; 94 CVBR,J CRP No;5279l2016 & Batch i' and (iii) whether tJle petitioners or ttieir i2i"e&Ccessors.in=interest had surrendered tenancy rights according to.law, and if so, when and in which proceedings. In compliance with these directions, the RDO has considered various documents frled before him which were marked as exhibits and basing on the same, submitt'ed a detailed report dated

27.07.1981 to this Court, which became part of the judicial order. The relevant portions of the RDO Report dated 27.07.1981 are extracted hereunder: In support of their claim ttwfoltowing dmtments lwrc be-enfiId I)CertiJied ertract of theTenonq Rqgtster prepared Under *ction 37-A of theA.P. , T A Act I95O marled a,s 2) Cenified ertract of tle Tenantq Eqgistar prepared Under Sec. 37-A of the AP TA. Act I 9 50 after inorporatbq tle Talsildar orclers dt. 6:1 1.1979 Ex-A1 F,x-A1(o1 .i) certtfied copy of the judgrient dated.7602-1978 of the High CourT in Writ Petition No. 7505 of 1977 f ebnmry t979 in C.R.P. No. 425 and.675 of 1977 4)Cerl{iecl copg of tle judgnent ddd, r:, ' |i) 'l'tu rrottce dated 10.4.1958 the Tribwul Tttlrstltlar issued under &ction 37-A : TsrtlilrslurLtl the provisional list of the ptotedd Ex-A-2 Ex-A-3 Ex-A-4 Tirrrrrrrt.s prepared Under *dion .)7 A for the Gqchibowli (Villai1e) 'l'lre Tctlrstlclar. Ralendranagar, first re$bndentfiIed a urittcn statement .slrrtirrg thut hc is an interested patTg a.s tle laniLs ln Sy. Nos- 37; 4O; 1 42: .1.1: 4,1: 45: 46: 47 53 mea.suing 11+37 Acres are @rrcrnm.ent lands, olttctirt<,tl tltu, to the gtrrender by tle pattadarlland talder under A.P. Lttrrrl Rel<tnns (Ceiling on Agrianlhtrol lwldittgs) Ad 1973 in accordanc.e rttttlt the orders dated 9.12.1975 of tle Additional Reuenue Diuisional Officer kurc[ Rc:fonns Tibunal) Hgdera.fud.ltrl*L IIe furtler stated tho,t tlx' srrrrJ lcurtis were taken ouer possessArn on 13-1O-1976 by tlte Couentrrrcrrt. f'te further stated that Ser tuvtlg tal@t ouer p)ssessiort of tirrr .srrrrl kutcls on 13.1O.1976 an utent of 31434 ents in 9y. lYo. 46 arrcl 47 uuas allotted on lease to Maharshi In$ifuttc of.oeatiue Intelligence by tlw Gouernnte:nt irt their orders in G.O. Ms.'No.:.549 Reu. Departmenl clate:d 20 04 1979. He further stated tlut there uere protected tenants ort these lrrrrrl.s ttut surrendered tteir tenancg r@hls wfuntartlg as such they are stol)pe(l lictrn claiming back tlrc lands. Thc $oltsildar hos submitted (-' 95 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch fiE follot4tilg frles and. Registers in support of his daims uhich uere got ma*dd ctb Exhibits- 1) erAna @pU of tle judgement of l,and. ReformsTtibunol (ARDOI Hyderabad West infile No: LRW 147/75 dated 31.5.1975 in resp. of . ounership ccrtiftcates Under sedion 38-E of Tenanrcg Act. 2) Tohtk Olfre file No. D.Dis. A4/2556/66 onnded to surender of PT Register Under serfion 19 of Hyderabad Tenancg Agris.tltttml Laws Act 1950 3) Tizhtk Offie File No.LRW 47/75 of ARDO Hgder.obad. West onnected to proeedings U/ sefrion 38-E of Tenancy Act. 4) Taluk Olfice File No.CC 264/w/75 orute&d to surender of surplus land. by tle lortd holder to Kashtopa Corporation and. taking ouer possession by conducting Panchanana- 5) ,Tahtk Otrte File No.D.Dis D2/2790/77 @tu@ded to the proposals of the Tahiildar far La,stng out the land.s in .fatrcur of Maharchi Institute of Creatiue Intelligence. 6) Tahk OtFe File No. D3/ 4565/ 79 connected to leastq out the lands in fauour of Maharshi Institute of Creatiue Intelligence. As per G.O. Ms. No: 7) Taluk alfic" File IVo.D.Ds. 84/4953/78 aruteded to the successiorr Proceedings of theTahsildar 8) Tafuk OIfrce File No. 84/ I 134/ 8() connected to tle Enqtiry U/ section 4O of Tenancy Act beforetle Tah.sildar Ex-Dl Ex-D2 Ex-D-3 Ex-D-4 Ex-D-S Ex-D-6 Ex-D7 Ex-D-8 Sri D.S. Rqiu National Director of Maharshi Institute of Creatiue Inte.lligenre fn his written statentent submitted that M/ s. Kashlopa @4toration tepresented bg its Managrng Partner Sn Rasiklcl Kandar fileal. delaration U/section. 8 (I)- of ceilirtg Act 1973. in CC NO. 264/ ut/?'S beforc the Land. Reforms Tribunal, Hgderabad West for the lands purclro.sed by his two panlners nanrely Sri Kantilal C Sheth and Ra"siklal Kantdar. It is stated that after hamng processed the declaration in am,rdante with tle provisiorts land clotttrt under the Act, giving tle detcils of tle publication of uarious ,rotrces the orders were passed on 09.12.1975 dire*ting the Land ltolder t<t surrertder 2.2862 extent being in erc€ss of the ceilhg limit, tlrc coryoratiort it is further stated has gtnendercd.tleland. in Sy. Nos. 37 40'12 to 47 53 35 and 36 nrcasuring 137-17 clcres. to the Governmerrt, ali<:r lrcuirtg failed in appeal and. reui;ion petitions before the Higlt Courl. After conrplying with tle fomalities as required in the rules arul the Act, through uarious noties and forms, tle lands were stated. to lruue tqken possession by tle Reuenae Diuisional Officer, Hgderabad West on 18-1-1977. The lands uthich were taken possession bg Oouernment from M/ s. Kastopa &4toralion are said to include Sg. No-s. 46 and 47 measuing, 11-70 ents and 19-73 cents respectiuely. It is further stated ttnt on an ...-'-"'-'-- '' % CVB&J CRP No.5279l20 16 & Batch j applimtion bg tle Malr;lrchi trnstifitte of C:rdirc hfeltigetie to the Gotrcmment for teasing r'fs lands for 'dcrrcbfiry as. A;stvam for Tlansendental Meditation ta dewlop tlrc irersonalitg of the hdiutdual, the &tternmeil l,as issued orders inG/.O.Ms. NO.594 dated 2G+1979 lea,sing out an actent of Ac-31-43 dn .Sgl. Nos. 46 and. 47 of fucltibowli uilloge for a period of 3O gears afier antsiderhg and arepting proposals stbmitted by the Colledor tlvottgh tle &mmissioner of land Reuenue. Awrdinglg after omplgbtg utith the onditions and. paghg tle lea.* annount and other eFpenses, under tle diredions of the hlldo4 the possessron of tle said. land.utas deliuercd. to tle Institute on 25* June 1979 bg the TahsiWar, Rajendenryor And. Euer slrr.e the lrrsitififie is in possession of the said land.. It is furtler submitted tltat tle pretitioners, instigated bg the failure of tle Kastopa &tporation in opeal and Reuision Petitions to auoid sutrender of the excess land, fild a writ petition in W.P.No.459O of 198O before the Wh burt daim@ tlte protected tenancA nghts on tle said,Iands. ft is allp.gtd. thal, tle patwari of Gachibowli village Sri B.Ve*ata Narayatu. who has been manipulating the reards by induding narnes of his fanilg nemibers and his henchmen in the pahanies slauting them utranglg a,s anltiuators has managed to get tle petition filed bg the petitioncrs beJore tle Tahsildar, Rajendranagar for a successors and o,ntents of tle origtnal tenants. It is further submitted.,for suocession certiftute anci on tle said material the Tahsildar granted successdon to tte pefitbners on 6.71.1979 without verifging tle basis facts. It i.s furttar submittd. tlut neither the petitioners nor their predecessors areinpossessron of the $y.IVos. 46 and. 47 for the last 3O years riglt fum 1950 till date. it is further stbmitted that Under Secfion aO of A.P. ff.A.) Terwry and. Agrianlfitml lands Act, 1950 the deceased tenants must be in possession of the land"s on tlrc date of their death of grarting the suoessionto his leirs. If this andition is nof satisfied it rs said thaf succession qnnot be issrrtd and for this rea.son, by the proceedings issrred bg tle Tah,sildar grantbtg succassion are not uqlid and are liable to be canelkd ft is osserted. that the succession of the tenancy rigltts granted on 6.11.1979 does r,o.t bind the Institute as the Institute acquired the possession of the said lands from the Gouerrtntent (Tahsildar) on 25rh ,lune 1979 uthich is much earlier than granting o/ succession and tle institute was also not a party to tlte said successron proceedings. Such vested riglX in reped of tlese lands crrnnot be disturbed without issufng a notice to the Institute and calling for its objectiors. It was further submitld thal ttere is no provisionunder A- P.T.A. tenancA and Agicultural lands act to i.ssue a ertifimte for joint tenancg under section aO of tlrc said. ad in fawur of the heirs of the decea.sed tenants stating with some strangers totollg unanrtded with these tenant families- It was fufther submitted thol Sri Kantilal C Sheth who has purcho.sed these lands including ,$y. /Vos. 46 and 47 after hauing obtained necessary permission under sedion 47 and 48 of the Tenancy Act. And tte prowdings of the Tahsildar in amrding pemtission clearlg shours thaf fuere uro,s ra) objection of tle tenants, if any should haue surrendered the righfs and that tleg urere not in possession on the releuant date in tle gear, 1961 and ttese proceedings establish that euen in the year 1961 tlere uas rw protectd tenants on these lartds. In respect of SC. No. 47 that Sri. Md. tsmail ond four others are stated to have surrendered tlvir tenancg rights in tlrc year 7966, in Tahsil Ftle No. A4/2556 /65 dated 16-10-1966 and tle Tahsildar accordinqly deleted their names in the Tenancg Register. In reqect oI SU. 97 cvB&J CRP No.527912016 & Barch ' :'..: No../ tt6'it is stated tlwt tlere was.no Protected Tenants at ang tim.e frcm the i;erii 1950 titt to'date ttic ertified ertracts of pahanies ftom the geor, 79Eb ufio date tle ertifid @pg af tle tenarrcy reard which ry"r-?.ry4 .alorr/ tinnt* written stalement are said to have wrified to established tlul:tl@re uias rui terrar7;1t in respect of. Sg.No.46. It is further submitted tifrl, "sniub tle land.s in: question which are uithin tle urbon ogglonedion of Hyderobad and are tterebg governed by Urban Land eitW Act, tle petitioiers hnue to fumish declarations under the said Ad dnd'io obtan a uotid order, bilt the petitioners are said that tleg .luve irciter apiitoocled the ompetent authority by fi&ling tle ne@Ssory dritlorations iS refd as this itself evident to slaw thot ttey are not in ihe possessian of the land durirq tlte notified date even otleruti*, it is 'dald. tttA tne pmioners would be only entitled to hald IOOO &- m.eterc e@A\ irrtd tlelj luue to strrender the rest of the land to tle Gouemment- It iSfifih,br stnmmea that tle petitioners neuer rqised any obiection at ttrc tinut of 'delfuery'of the land. to tte Institute on 29h June 1979 irtspite of lAuW giuen uide publicitg as theg were not in possession of this land al dng iiib: ft is Turtter submifted that the land in question is a rcckg'land tnos,t ih.et,en aind. unfit for any kind of cultiuation and it is onlg a leanrclu tCitUt aS 'Sttc[:r tlere uta.s ,to anltiuation at ang ttme as is clear from tfte iiihdiilir$ ftom tle gears, 195O to 198O as such it is stated that tle 'at44AiAn- tnot tte-petitioners were caltiuating tlts land is false. In ary1pit of tts claims tle foLowing docunrcnts were filed, and got marlcd. lis e'ihttuits. '' 't, -.a ' &ifien @pg of the iudgment of the land Refonlr-s T?ibunal, Hgderabad West No.LRW 47 75 dated 31.5.1975 @rtified etdrocts of the Paltoli for S. No-s 46 cbtd. 47 for tle years 1949'50 5I 52 53 54. eftifred. extract of tle Sasala Paltaru for Sy. Nos- 46 and.47. for the gear 1955 56 56'57 57-58 ertified ertract of the pahanr for Sq. Nos. 46 and 47 for the years 1958'59 1959'60 1960-61 and. 196l-62. &rtified ertract of the pahartt lbr .Sr7 Nos. 46 and 47 for tle gears 1962'6-1 196-] 64 64-65,65-66. Certified eft,ract of the palwrti f<tr Sy N<ts. 46 and.47 for tlrc gear lS66 67. 67 68. 6U 69. 69-70. ertitrea ertract of the Pcilrarti /or Sr7. Nos 46and4TforAears l97O 7l 76 77 77'78 &mfied ertroct of tle Palmni for Sy N<t 46 and4Tforthe gear 1978 79 79'80 ertified extract of Tenancg Record Reqrster, 1950-51 for Sy. Nos.37, 40 42 43, 47 @rtifted opy of the judgenrcnt of the Land Reforms Tribunal C.C.NO.26'|/ W/ 75 dt. 9.12.1975 C.emfied copy of the judgement in Frle No- 264/W/76 dt. 8.1O.1976 3) 4) 6) 7), 8) e) 10)' 11) ' ----''--'.-.--.:... -.-.-. , Ex-eI Ex-C2 Ex-C3 Ex-C4 k-c5 Ex-C6 Ex-C7 Ex-C8 Ex49 Ex-C10 Ex-CI1 _-i I I I I I 98 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Barch o Tle thitd. pgrtg paitbiers sgqn Kuja utd otters lunte: sabmifred in tleir petition dated 21st April lg9l thor Kannannet Bataiah'antd. otlters wla ftled pf,itiott's fuforc tlai rottsildar, Rajendranagar in rc@ct of sg. No-.37i !o1 +z , !r, sI; s2 and s3 mbrepreseiing hat it. "iai"t prctected tenantts ilc;luding furuasri Manik rddg irra xastm,Ali"died. torq bacN obtaircfl s,r.ce"1dor, certifiute which is to be "rrr*uJ.i-i further suoinittca thot ttgc u)ere informed. bg tt ^ Tah.siidar, Raiendranagar during t?e enquug proeeding o1a caie in whie;h to*" iy tlem hod. submitted a detaild. @unter, ttwt-o,s-per the orders of the Heh &urt in writ Petition No. 4s9o / 80, ttrc Rewiue Diui"sionat cifr"-, qpilt4 as atguw olfrrer as such ttut case luris been staged. tiil "i" eryrru i.s amplded. bg the Revenue Diuisbna.t Offier. fneg funher submitted.thd, durtng.the pendency of the snid. proceidings some oytnem W_pJ::*ted. a petition in person to the Tattsildar, Aijendrarigar on 17-3-1981 but ra action rls sard to haue been talcen. It is further submitted; t?at tle lhild putg petttioners orrc to eight and. ten aie tte triirs of ile dwasd- hotected renants in whose fawur certifrcates are slotid. to luue been isstrcd under xgtion 37-A of 'Tenarrcg Act, os such theg are the inlerested wrsons and. entitled to hotd. tle aboue tard.s. The petitioners are stqtd. tn haue no locus standi except hauing some expatte ord.ers fym Hglble High &urt: It is furTher stat;d tnot tto vittages'patuai and. tle petitioners hauin-g anstrued iilegat proceedings whtih haue atreadg talcen plae just to depriue tle rights of t}r,se third. parTy petitioners. Tle uillage offter is sald to. be prejudiciatty acting agatit'the interest of these: third ?orty petitioners and certilyi"g thatlhe tiuttg pe rons crs dead.. As sach tleg rquested to imptead tlem and. to aajuaicate tleir tenanq rights cts__protected tenants. Some these third. paiy. petitioners luue al.sofled $fidatits ctaiming their heir-ship to tle aecekea tenants. In support of tleir daims tlag jited. the fottow[ng docttments uthich were got marked as ertubits: 1) Tenanrcy Certificate No. 4 in fauour of Yedas La-nnaiah o.nd Ahmed Sab etc. 2) Tenancg Certificate No. S in fauour of Ahmed Sa.b, Kqsim Ali etc. 3) Tenanrcy Certiftcate No. 14 in fauour of Gadda Lachiga and llanif Saheb. 4) Tenancg- Certificate No. l S in fauour of Manik Reddy, Gadda Veeraiah etc. 5) Tenanrcg cerTificate No. 16 in fauour of Ismail (rwt clearlg legible) 6) Tenancg Certificate No. 6 in fauour of Ka,simAli, Gadda. Maisa and etc. 7) Tenancg C-ertificate No. 9 in fauour of Bat Lingq Yousuf Ali etc. Er_E_I Ex-E_2 Ex_E-3 Ex_E_4 EX-E-S Ex_E_6 Ex-E-7 a 99 CVB&J CRP No.5279 l2O I 6 & Batch Another'third. porlV petttioner Sri. Kolttilol C. Sheth }rrs s:arbmitteL that the loznds"befug Qy. iVos. 37, 40; 42 to 47 51; 52 and 53 admeasurhg 157 al.lres oN 3 guntas at G?chibowti uillage are hi^s pattalands as tleg are said to haue purctusdfrom Smt. Iqbal Fatima Smt. Kanea Fatima and Ra.strid. Fdimo, dantglters of late llgas Efurani afier obtainhg pennission und.er sedion 47 and. 48 of the A-P- T.A. Tenancg on Agn'aitural lands Act,. 1950 vide permission No..L- ALs A3 11422/61 datun 2fth Augast 1961 from thc Talsildor, Hgderabad. West it is further flbmittel. tlut tle petitioners protected tenants lnve alreadg stnendeted tlwir rigltts before tle Tat,s;itdar and. passed orders in Ftle No. A3 / 1O8O5/e dated 18h February 65(2) A3/3749/65 dated N Aprit 1965 (3) A4/2556/66 dared 16h October 1966 and accordinglg tle rtam.es of oll protedcd. tenants have been deleted from tte tetancy Rqister and the sanne urcts atso hetd by the Additional Retnnue. Diu'sional Olfier lland. Reforms Tribunal) Hgderabad West'in his Order No. LRW47/75 dated 31.5.1975 it is furtler stated that the petitioners prcfectd. tenants lnue fited a ampromise petition dated 3oth mag 1975 bejtre thc Additional Revenue Divisional olficcr (l-o.nd Reforms Tribunal) Hgderabod West in Ftle No. LRW/ zl7/ 75 and for that it is stated that the pdttttoners uere paid c6mpensation and holding tle receipts to ttul elfcd.It is also stated that tle petitioners lnve deliberately omitted this third partg petitbner to impleod, so ttnt the parlies dreod.y impleaded to the sl.tit may.not effditrclg ontest tte suit and. desired to be present in the s;.i;it to awid ang mllusiue tactics between tte petitioners and res,oondents- In support of his claim le tns filed tle following doanments whbh are got marleed as Exhibits. 1) 2) s) 4) s) 6) 7) 8) e) 10) 11) Memo of tle ollrce of the Tatsildar, Rajendra nngar inf,orming that the copies of the orders songhtfor in File No.F3 / IOSOS / 64 cannot be dssued as tle said file has been destroyed due to elflux of time. Permission under section 47 and 48 of Tenancg-Act 1950 bearing No. L. Dr.s A3/ 1142261, dqted 26.8.1961 Rqistered sale deed dated 2-9-1961 for the purchase of lands by. Sri Kantilal C Steth for and on behalf of Kashtopa Corporation dpanment no. 25OO of 1961 Certified extract of the pahani for Sy. Nos. 37; 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52 and 53 for the year 1950-51 &rtified ertract of the pahani for Sy. Nos. 37, 40, 42,43, 44,45, 51, 52 A $ for the year 1954 Certified etctract of tle pahani for Sy. Nos. 37, 40, 42,43, 44, 45, 51, 52 & 53 for the gear 1952 & 1953 Certifted Ertract of *sala Pahani Certified Ertract of Sasala Pahani Certified Ertract of Sasala Pahani Certified ertract of Pahani for Sy. Nos. 37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 51, 52 & 53forthe year 1959-60: 60-61 Certified ertract of Pahani for Sy. /Vos. 37, 40, 42, Ex-9.1 Ex-8.2 Ex-8.3 Ex-B..4 Ex-B.5 Ex-8.6 Ex-B..7 Ex-8.8. Ex-8.9 Ex-B.10 Ex-8.11 !' n :'.r,: r00 cvB&J CRP No.527912016 & Barch 12) 13) 14). !st 16) 17) 18) 1e) 20) 21) 22) 23) 24) 25) 26) 27) 73,45, 57, 52 & 53fortle gear 196041 C?rtifid aitroct of Pahani for .S!r. /Vos. 37, 40, 42, 4q,45, 57, 52 & 53forthe gear 1960-61 & 6I-62 . Cefifrd &ract of Pcilwni for gy. ffos. 37, 40, 42, 43,45,57,52 & 53fortle year 1962-63 & 1963- 64 eftifid &rabt of Pahani for Sy. IVos. 37, 40, 42, 43,45,51,52 & 53forthe gear 1964-65 eamfid. &ract of. Palwni for Sg. lYos. 37, 40, 42, 43,45,51,52 & 53forthe gear 1966 elfifien &ract of Pohani for Sy. lVos. 37, 40, 42, 43,45,51,52 & 53forthe year 1966 @rtifrd &ract of Pahani for Sg. /Vos. 37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 51, 52 & 53 for the gear 1966-67; I 968 Wtfrd &ract of Poluni for Sy. lVos. 37, 40, 42, 43,45,51,52 & 53forthe year 1968-69; 1969-70 &rtified ertract of Palnni for Sy. /Vos. 37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 51, 52 & 53for the gear l97O-71 @ttifrd elract of Palnni for Sy. /Vos. 37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 5.7, 52 & 53 for the gear 197 l-72 C.;ertifien e:dract of. Pahani for Sy. Nos. 37, 40, 42, 43,45,51,52 & 53forthe year 1972 73 C.eflifid eract of Pahani for S.y. Nos. 37, 4O; 42, 43, 45, 51, 52 & 53 for the gear t973-74 ettifid. &ract of Pahani for Sy. lVos. 37, 4 O, 42, 43,45, 57,52 & 53forthe year 1974 75 @rtified ertract of Pahani for Sy, ilos. 37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 51, 52 & 53 for the year 1975 76 erdfied ertract of Pahani for S-r7. Nos. 3 7, 4 O, 4 2, 43, !5, 51, 52 & 53 for the year 1976 77 etfifred ertract of Pahant for Sy. lVos. 37, 40, 42, 43, 45, 51, 52 & 53 for the year l()77 78 @ified ertract of Pahani for S.y. Nos .l Z, 40, 4 2, 43, 45, 57, 52 & 53 for the yeor t97B 79 tu-g.12 Fx-B.13 Ex-B.14 tu-F.l5 k 8.16 tu-g.17 Ex-B.18 Ex-&.19 Ex-B.20 Ex-B..21 Ex-B.22 F*-8..23 Ex-8.24 Ex-B.25 Ex-8.26 Ex-8.27 Nl tl@ pafties did rwt choose for exantintrq ang uritnesses except re$wdent no.2 utla desired to exarnire. lrc,o rurfrlesses rtamelg furuasn Hafturqqna Babu Dy. Tahsitdar arrcl Sn V Narsimha Rao, Dy. Taltsildar, Tle petitioners and others parties lvtue clearlg informed. tlut thc dmnents sabmitted are sufficteri to gtrcttt' tlt<: respec.tiue claims as sudtno oralevidenre is required. xm, EEEL.. Fhtdlttos: As gtild. be'fio^tle aboue discus.srorr ctrrcl artlLtrrrcrts of the respondents 1 and. 2 Sri Kantilal C: Slrcth the tlurcl Ttortq petitioner, who are artanding tlut the petitioners haue: surr<:rrclere.d their rights referring to thb prwdings of the Tah.sildar sunertdered. tlte ngl:Js under section 1O of tle Tenancy Act in File No. 45/ |0S0/64 dated 10.8.1965, A3/3759/64 dded 2.4.1965, A-)/ 2559/ 66 containing sunender prceedingq file LFW/a7 175 of tlrc. Iand refornts tribunal(APDO) HAd"req West, antaining tlrc con4trornise ctnd orders deteting tte l0r CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch narnes of proteted tetwnls fiom palla prorydings under sdion 38-E and a @pg of the Memo isste bg ttte Tahsill offte stding tltat the File A5/ 1080/64 and A3/5749/64 were &-sfiogeC, the Taluk 9ffie frle No. CCI' 4/W/75 ontaining uerifiation of lolding,under eiling l-aut andftle No. D.Dis. 82/5790/77, 82/45 8/75 and the ertifid. &rad of tte pahanies for Sy. illos. 37, !0, 42, 43, 44,45, 51, 52 and 53 for tle gears 1950-51, to 1979-8O except 1954- and ertifted &racts of tle pahanies for ,Sg. No. 47 and 48 for tle gears 1950-51 1979-80 exapt I954-55 ft is abundantlg ctear that some of tle petitiorers and predeessors of some of tle petitioners wlrc are no doubt tle some perscrts of the Tenancy Record of. 1958, luve sunendere4 their rQhts under section 19 of Tenancy Act to tle extent of Sg. Nos. 37, 40, 42, 45 and 47 infavour of Smil.Lingamma, the Tenatrcg Reard of 1951 in uthich 2O persons were declared as protested tenanls, cr.ntains a note tfu elJM. tlut a dispute between tle larld owner and. the tenants in reqed, of anltivation and possession for ceftain lands inclusiue of Sg. Nos, 37, 40 42, 43'and' was exi:;ting and the suit uas pendfu 'before the @uemnent authorities. 7}ris shours that ttere wos dlong drawn out dispute befioeentlrc tenants arul the land lolder and tle suit uthidt uas fild. W tle lantd. oumer Smt. Lingamma before tlrc Additional Judge, Citg Ciuil &urt, Hydembad in ttrc year 1952 was ultimatelg resolued bg the an.npromi.se between tle beJ'ore tle High Court in an appeal petition. In pursuanw of compromise de<:ree the protected tenants and tlte legat lwits of dead. protected tenants who died during the pendency of the s-uit, hanrc filed their sworn petition beJbre tlw To.ltsildar under sedion 19 of Tenanq Act ttrcg are amrdinglg nrlffLes were deleted in tle gearE, 1965-66. ?ftrs &s at one side, at the oth'er side some of the suit tands dn Sy. Nos- 37, 4O; 42, 43 and 47 of Sn:t- Lingamma were purclu.sed bg one Sn Ilyas Efurni saheb and the patta was affected in fus nam.e in tle gear, and. since tlen trc wo.s in ou:upation of them and not tle prcteded tenants as per the entries. in the (Puhantes) Village Accounts. Ilyas burn| who uto,s olread.y holding some otler lands in 'Sy. Nos. 44, 45 46, 51. 52,53 as pafta in his name, was oantpation of these as per the entries in pahanies. But in tlle year 1959 under section 37-A, 16 persorls houe been declarcd as protected tenants. If the entries of possessron and anltiuation in tle polunies are of any beanng to the provisions of *c" 37-A a.s c:lear form the )anguage of this section, tlere couLd. lnue been no ddaration of proteded tenants on tte lands held bg llyas burni tle gear 1958. But ft rrs nof known tnw they w.?re declared as protected tenants under section 37-A on tle lands teld bL, llyas Burni in the gear 1958. In tlrc absence of tle reord of proceedirtgs under section 37-A nothing ould be said about the d<lclaration tlrc protected tertants. Howeuer, the entries of recording protected tenants the Tenancg Register of 1958, is tle conclusive proof to scrg tltat some of the petitioners and predecessors of some of the pc;titiorrcrs were declared as protected tena,nts; Wrcther this declaratiort was contested or not or what happened them, is rwt known as nothing is prochtced Hence I do not agree with the arguments of Sri Kanthilal C S/reth tltat there are no protected tenants under Secfibn 37-A of Tenancg act. Bul one thing is certain, providing ttwt tlle petitioners were the tenants of tlrc llgas Burni in tle year 1958 the declaration of protected te'nctncy on tlte lands namelg. Sy. No.37, 40, 42, 43 and 47 wos rather ir.correct as on tlrcse lands the petitioners and their prede@ssors were atreody ltolding protected terwncg ,iqhls. The sedion 37-A is quite clear tlwt Euery person who is tlrc ommencement of the Hgderabad Tenancy t02 cvB&J CRP No.527912016 &BaB;h o and Agrianfitral lands Amenlment Act, lgss holds os tenant is land. in rc-srya of uthich he is rct deentd. to be a protected tenart under this Ad,, slull be dmnd ta be a P. Ts shce some of tte petitbner5 and. tleir pt?i@ssors uiere r:mt tenonts but actualty hoiaing-ilre protetd. tenanq rights on tle slarid land.s, as such they aud not hiw ogain ben deemeZ or drclarcd as prctedd. tenarts. Howeuer, whetherlnot uas right or utotg the ndfer is not lefi opn for me to decide in this enqiry. fie tirftlish issue rls tlu, tlw strender of the tenancy rights effectd. : in tne gear 1965 on tle lartd.s.gy. lVos. 37, 40, 42, 43, ana +Z i[ong with otter lands of $mt Lilqatruna though theg do not belong to her bg that time, @ri be taleen as the stnend.er of protected tenancy rights acqired in tle gear 1959 infawur of tle then present land holder Kantitat C. Shrlt.. Here it is rtot Mr uthg the sunender of protected tenancy rights on the sizid. lands was urid. out in favour o7- Lingo*^a whei sle utas not holding pattq euen llga.s Burni was not in the picture then os after hi.s dath hrs successots nnmely lqbol Fatima, Kanees Fatima and Rashrr;d. Fdima houe ame on tle rmrd as patta.d.ars, sold themto sri. Kanthilit c. sheth iru 1961. Here even presuming that the surrender uatiditg took ploe infawur of the land lwld.er to the ertent of suit lands, tltere rematn $ill some more land.s in Sy.. Nos. 44, 45, 46, Sl, 52 and 53 on which tto sunender under sqtion 19 took place as no euidence of proeedinEs under sAion 19 of the act, has beZn produced. Thus it is ilear tlur hse lus ben streider of rytds bg the petitioners ortd their predecessors is intercst ontle lard,s rn qy, Nos. 37, 40, 42, 43 and 47 in the gear 1965 iyfatpur of SrnL lingannw in purxtane of the compromise decrees of HUhAuft inA.S. No.25 of 1958, though she was not holding ang patta r@hfs on thd, dag on this surrender cannot deenrcd for the rights giuen in tle gear 7958,tlanryh the protected tenants Luere neuer in possessrbn rigtttftom 1958 as per the entries in the village accourils(pahanies)... Under the prowdings of section 38-E of A.t,. TA Tenancg Agriattturat Lcld"s Act 1950 before the Land Refonns Tibunal APDO Hyderabad. West Diui.siory for gmnting patta nghts to the protectecl tenants a,s rquired. therein, a provisional list indrcattrtg tlv: rrentes of t6 protected tenarts a,s per tte Tenancg Register ruas r:ssucri uncler ntle 4 (2) and a apg of it uto,s sertd. onthe protected tenants p<:titioners ond land tatder and. it uto,s pubtisled in the uillage Chauach cts requirecl under tle rutes. Tle prctected tenonts petitioners haue filed a Petrtiort before the Tribunat Additional Reventrc Diuisional Officer, I{yderabacl West for qranting palta under setion 384. The Landholder Sri Kruiilctl (t.Streth also ftled obftdion petitbn stating that the protected lenant.s sltoutrt in provisional li,* uere ngtrer dn possessircn of the land arvl ltaue also surrend.ered prctented tenancg riglis before the Tahsilcler, As such, the proeedings under wtion 38-E dropped. Meanwlile both tlrc parties haue omprcmised andfiled. a ompromise petitiort throuqh as aduocate stating ttwt tleg hate privately decided the chspute and waiving and ShfteddArittg their protected 'l'enancy Rigtrfs tn respe<:t of the ands anemd. hereininfavour of Sri Kantlilal C Sheth and his predeessors in inherent. The Tribunal on the basis of ttte clocrrnrenrs filed by the land lalder heW that all the protected tenants haue surrertdered tteir rights as euidened in his tenarrcg Register, 195 1 antd all ttw nentes being ommon for 1958 it uta,s tokcn ttwt they haue surrerrdered. the protected tenon"g nghts, and tle claim of the petitiorters was di:rr.siortctl stciling that they haue no loans standi after surrendeing the-tr riqltts ouer the said land in I I I ; I ! i ! 103 CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch the years 1965-66 beforc tle Tahsitd:ar. Sri Kanttilat C Stnth the third parlg petttioner lws submitted in lus statenent tlut in iiew of this ampromisq ompen sation uxrs al"sb paid. to tle petitioters cnd is ltolding tle receipt to that effect. the respondents Laid.2 and. Sri Kanthilal C. Sletl\ tle third party petitioner untended lhat, tlough the petitioners are not tte protected tenar'y';s ard theg utere'not in possessrbn right from the gear 1958 in which the Tenanq Re.qrd. uta,s prepared, tle said ordrzrs of the Land Reforms Tlibtfiul is anottter a n&tsive proof to the effect that "the protecbd tenants hante atnendcrcl thbir rights on the suit laruls. It is seen tlnt afier these ordets d|tne Una nefontts Tlibunal, tlrc pro;tected tenants petitioners did i@t agitirte W filing bg petition before tlrc competent courts for granting.of patta dghts uider section 38-E setting aside tte said orders ti_U todag. ft is a rwteutorthg po9int to sau hat tle opportunitg under sdion 38-8, ul,ltidrttttts rrurne beneficial than ttnt of claiming the proteddtenancg dghts, utlticiuas prcuidbd by tle land reforms tribunal APN Hgderohod'West dssurng the prouisionat list granting pafta to the petitioners utas not.availd, the ptotdd. tenancy rigltts in to ownership, s:.tdt on inportant bercft on enlarging tle protected tenancy ,ights ilrto patta r@hrs, raas losf bg tle protected itibrested in the lands as tenants petitioners. FIad tleg reallg @ claiming now, inespective of possessfrin whetler gnjoyitl(, or not as prcvided in the said section, tlry @uA not'luve lost and tleg auld not hairc b<:en silent all these days. Hene. q. gue rise to xtspicion whether tlley were hotding tle protrcted tenaru;g rigllts szbslstr'ng .on the suit lands: : In respect of the proceedings undq Ifld @ili@ Act'before the tand Re.forms Tnbww.l, as could be wn from ttg Recyrlrd of enwtiry of Taluk Of,7ce and the orders passed. bg tle laid. Reforms Tribunat, the petitioners neuer approqcled tle land Refonns TfiDnnal with any ob.iectiott clcining that tlrc stit tands are held..bg them a.s protected te,tants as such they slwuld" be deletd.futn:the anryrutation or should not be accepted as surplus swendercd; land,s.'When most of land.s cotcented heretn were surrendered W the Kasltopa &rporation, due publicity issrrirrg notice was giuen to tle pblic in general in the fonn is przscnbed and in the manner reqtired tlwein- No objection of ang sort tue-re preseril<:d to ttle Land Reforms Mburtal The lond"s surrendered u)nen senl for uerification uhether thq are en&nbad in anA manner, thz 'lalsrl Autlrcrities haue made an enqiry. ln the proceedttgs of enquiry of DC. Tahsildar Land. Reforms has also recordecl tlrc statement of tlrc patuad of tle village. The patwari deposed that theret protected tenants ouer tle 's:ulit lottds, but tlEC haue strrrertderecl ttrctr nglts long back undcr tle prcedings of under section 3i|-E, artd tlrcir names lnue rat been deldedfum thc protected tenancy Register. IIe, further disposed that the ptoteiled tenants are not irr lrrrssessiorr <tJ' tlrc suit lqnds and ttere uta,s fto encumbrances ouer tlrc srritl lands on the land Holders tils Kashlopa &rporation are in prrssessrorr of the lartd since tle date of pnctuse. Awrdingly, land Refonrus Tnbwrul accepted surrender of tle larrds and ordered for tlrc tctking ouer possession. Tlrc Reuenue btspdor, Iirqanvailg Circle in the p.esettce of the Dy. Tahsildar l-ard. Refomc ho,s talccn or,rer possessrorr fiom the. Kashtopa Corporation. While taking possessron a Panchanant u'as cortducted apart from getting prewibed forms filled in and dulg r04 CRPNo.52?9&16&Batch ( i cvB&J signd. bg tlrc qrwrned. For ennducting pancltanama 3 pneles wla ore Rcsidents of tle Villqe hanre been sel. td. and panclunamto de effd.: tltat tle lends were handed over bg the Rashiklol Komdhor oh futulf of Kashtopa Cotporation and taken ouer bg tlre. Reuenue Ini1xrf,or, Lilqa4pollg, Circle Fu.s beenmade. From a perusal of this Panchnnam4 on interestirtg thing tto **,, tatie. is that one Gadda Chinna Babaiah S/o. Bala Lingaiah ory of W Panfias is found as one of the petitioners to this suit and 'anottter interesting point is tltot while handing over and taking ouer pruess and. going oq Saruosri Gadda Maisaiaih, Kondaiah and. ottrcrs lunte anne io tle sitb and. ask th.e Reuenue Offrcials whether theg mn malee u.* of tle grrass on tle lands since ttrcy were in agreement for tle ptpo* ttpto 'Mrigasila. Kaithi", but the olficers informed tten that on the,*, land"s rtobodg sluuld under as they haue become Gouemment Lottd,s and. if thq are interested. to take them for granting purryses,. tlry s.houW approach Tahsil Offtce ody. This piece of euidenbe clearly shoras tllat tha petitioners protected tenants are aware of the Ceiling proeedings of tlq. land"s anremed lerein and of lhe sunender of excess surplus landq to the fuuernment and it goes against their contentioa daiming ttut thq arc in possession and enjogment for the last more than 30 gats.and thq haue agitated and resisted when they came to know of the attotment of tle land to the 2nd responclent through the GQ on I3-9-198O. Had tt eU ben'reallg in possession and enjoyment by uirtue of tle protAed. tenancy rigltts theg uuld haue euen protested on tle date of takhq 6uer possession of the land bg the Reuenue Inspector Qne of the ptttioners d . StIVo. 6 was partg to the Panchanam conducted; at the time of hanillittg otrer and. taking ouer of tle lqnd and other petitioners wlto werc prcsenl on the site were also made ettquiries with the Gouemnent ofiCials ulether tlrcg will be allouted to use the lond. for grassirq purynse as it utas in agreenent from the land holders for the term ending uith nert "Mtigasira Korthi". Ttuts it slrouls tlrc hollowness o/ the daim of the petitioners that theg were in possession and enjoymen! of the londs as P.Ts. In vieu of these facts the contentton of the petitionas tluf fiB proteded tenants were in possessiorr ancl e.njoyment of the tands bg utrtue of tle protect tenancy rigltts cloes not hold good. I argue udth the argumenls of the leorned. couasel-s to Sn- kanthtlal C. Slath and. of tle secortd. respondent that the protected tenants were neuer rn posessbn' rWhl from 1954 as evidenced bq tfu mllarte. accounts (Pahanies) and. tle prceedings took place before tLLe l,ancl Refonns Tribunal (A.R.D.O.) Hgderabad. West under Secliorr -)8 E for qrenttig patta rQhts to tlrc ptotected tenants and the. re:cortls uuailable of the eiling bw ' proeedirEs. As regards the conterircrs of tlrc leamed aunsel ta the 2nd. R*pondcnt tlnt the igltts of llrc protected tenanis if anU ate abdicntel. or esdinguished as ttey are banecl under section 27 of tle Limitation Acn, as hetd. bg the High Court in ttrc judgement reported in 1978 {2) A.P.I+J page 86. In the ciratmstances a-s cli.sor ssed aboue of tle evidene prcdued, I haue no hesitation in agreeirry with him as all tle moterial produd. will go in fauour of rt ortly. uut the question posed bg tt@ High burt to decide is, "Did the petitioners or ang of tlei or their pred.ecessors in interest surrender their Tenancy Rights, acording to.laut and if no which of them when and" in whiclt pro..edings. Sine tlteissz,re is of tle sunender and that to accord.irtrl to land. the ixtinguisfunents of nshts is not the subject matter to cle-cide., il is rrol d"esirable for me b SrrZ - . ..-...1--4"" lQs CVBR.J CRP No.5279 l2O I 6 & Batch speciftc finditlgs on it". Here (ardfu.1g tp lau) tnearls acording to tte pirli;ioi,s o"dit*it in'irre renarw f,afoim*ing strrender of renarrcg fiEhts. The sdion 79 of said.'Adlqsprcut'stonfor.stnen{er. Aerording to whichit sltould be in utrttittg and is d&ittid before ttrc Tah.sildar and it stautd be made in good faith to tte disfaction of the Tahsildar. No etidene of tle adion taken or prowdings onducted under section 1O of tle Act, was produed.Ttlrls it utas deoflg be saidthnt no such process o1- surrender by the piobdgdtn-nonts petitioners under section 10 for tte r4lhls aquired unde/sdidn 37['has takn plare so far, though the peltitioners claim that tleg are dn possessrion and enioyment is found bcseless. b) ilhe Division Bench in W.A.No.l4zO of 1987, after taking note of the ,rbjections raised by the District Collector and considering the orders of the learned Single Judge, upheld the validity of RDO's report. Since the State did not challenge the said decision, the [inding:; recorded therein attained finality: The Joint Collector, being a quasi-judicial authority; has no power to question thc judicial sanctit) of a report that rras accepted and upheld by this Court. Section 158 of the Telangana L,and Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli, empowers the RDO to entertain appeals and also to exercise oriqil-rerl jurisdiction in matters arising under the Land Revenue A(:t or ilrtv other larv in force. This indicates t]rat the RDO, as a Supcrior ()lficcr, is compe tent to act as the original authorit5r under Rule l4 rcircl rvittr Rule 26 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lztnrl [lulcs, 1950, mcre particularly when this Court has directecl to sttbmit a report ort the speci{ic issues for effective adjudication o[ disputcs' Moreover, Section 88 of . the Tenancy Act, 1950 states thzrt the Tahsildar, the Tribunal, and'tl1e Collector shall perfrrrm such 106 cvBR J CRP No.527912016 & Batch functions as ',,ay be prescribid or referred to them by the Government. section 89 of the Tenancy Act further pro.rido that the procedure under sections L49 and lso of the Telangana L,and Revenue Act shall apply to inquiries under the Tenanry Act, and that the Tahsildar, Tribunal, and colhctor shall exercise powers akin to those of a Civil Court. c) The learned Senior counsels appearing for the respondents placing much reliance on paragraph 13 (d)(xvii) of the common order dated 25.02.2013 passed in cRp No.67og of 2oo3 and batch, has submitted that earlier orders passed in w.A.No .t42o of Lggr is non- esf in law and the report relied in the said judgment is not having any evidentiary value. Admittedly in earlier occasion, the learned single Judge of this Court while exercising powers under Article 226 of the constitution of India decided the w.p.No.4s9o of lggo vide order ,dated 17-02-1981, directing the RDo to conduct an enquiry and place a report. seeking implementation of the RDo report dated 27 -o7.L981 and issuance of tenancy certificates, the tenants filed w.P-No.4059 of lg82 and the same was disposed of vide order dated 15.07.1987, on the same subject in issue and parties also same, except some of the respondents herein, who said to have purchased the propetLy pend.ente lite. The order of the learned single Judge was assailed before the Hon'ble Division Bench under clause 15 of the ! 107 CVBR.J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch a [,etters Patent. The Honble Division Bench taking note of t]re facts and r:he reportiof the RDO datgd 27.07.1981 dismiSsed the appeal confirrning the report and observations made by the learned Single Judgt:. Sr-lbsequently, the Division Bench of this Court in CRP No.67O8 of 2OO3 and batch dated 25.02.2013 while exercising the powers under revisional jurisdiction under the Tenancy Act has obsen,ed that the earlier judgarent of the Division Bench in WA No.14:20 of L987 is oramnoniudie. The issue relating to declaring the eerrlier judgment passed by the Division Bench in cxercising power:; under Article 226 of Constitution of India can it be said as coram non judie by a revisional Corirt with equivalent strength is left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Sh.abna Abdulla os tlnlon. of Indiat3a w'hitc placing reliancr: on the decision ia Oflficial Ltquidator us. Daganandl3s observe d that Coordinate Bench's view of sarne High Court cantrot be ignored even if considered to be incorrect in law and the orily' optiort is to refer the same to Larger Bench. [r the latest decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Cgurt rr-I M/s.A.P.Electrical @utpmemt Corporo;tion os. The Tahsitdor and otherst:tb observed as follows: "'zoz4INSC 612 "'(2008) lo scc I 'tu2o25 tNS,-' 274 l' 108 CVBR,J CRP No.5279/2016 & Batc,h ,r-) '35- If tuo decisions of this:dun apwar btrcnsistent'utith achotlrcr, tle Higlt c-ourts are not to follout one and.overluk tle otler, bfi shotttd. try to rconctte and res@"them both and. tle onty uag to ilo so rb to *p-t tE e: suggestion of Lord qinn u. Latdrn niNUury gilnn in 1_90! 4c 495 at p.so6 and dteratid bg iln privg punjab c\oieratiue Bank ud. v. e,ouicilin&mmr. of Iname'Taxl^atarz, efr tgqo K23o: ':..... euery judgment must be rwd as apptic.able to tle particular facts proued or osatmd. to ptovd" sinre the g"roroirtg of the erpressrons, which mag fu found fitere, are t.-t intended. io be eryositions of tfu_ yllale laut, but gouemed or qtatified. by the partianlar fads of the .ose in utdclt srrclr erpresiiois are to be found.b -fu andfollow that duisionulasefbd.s apwar more in auord. with those of the case at hand.." e) Be that as it fray, the Governrnent while exercising powers under section 97 r/w section 35 and 3z of the Tenancy Act has flramed the Andhra pradesh (Terangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Rules, lgso (for short oRures, r950,). The Government in exercise of powers under section 7 of Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli, read with Hyderabad District ofl-rcer changc of Designation and construction of References Act, lg5o, issuccl notificatio' vide G.o.Ms.No.72 Revenue DepartmenI clatecl 27.o1,.1960 published in A.p Gazntte part I dated ]t.02.1960 (pagc 416) which specil-res that the Deputy Collector or Assistanr Collr:cr.r or thc Sub-collector, incharge of Revenue Division of Distric[s .[ Hydcrabad Area of the state of Andhra pradesh, may be callccl zrs "R(:venue Divisional oflicer' (RDo). Rule 12 of the Rures, r95o srzrtcs that the Second Taluqdar (RDo/Deputy colrector), the Taruqdar (collector), the Board of Revenue (ccLA), or the Governmenr ma_y or their own accord at,anyllrug-.or-within 3 months from the datc of a. ., 109 CVBR.J CRP No.5279 f2O I 6 & Batch order in appgal under.Rule 11, on the appligation of,any party, call for and examine the Provisional Record of Tenanciesl relating to any entry and pass orders thereon as they deem fit and proper. This would make it clear tl.at the RDO as a Deputy collector is conferred with prower on his own accord or on the application of any person, call for and examine the provisional record of tenancies and pass approtrlriate qrders. ln addition to the a-bove findings, it is important to emphasize 0 that when a judicial forum like the High Court, in exercise of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, specificall5r calls fcr a fact-finding report from the designated oflicer, not below the rarLk of Revenue Divisional Oflicer and the report submitted in complizrnce with such judicial directions becomes part and parcel of the judicial proceedings. Such a report carries not only evidentiary value but also sancti$r, particularly when the same is accepted and atrainecl finality. An administrative or quasi-judicial authority like the Joint C:ollector cannot sit over an appellate authority over the judicially affirmed factual report which was upheld by this Court' Furtherrnore, Rule 14 and Rule 26 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Rules, 1950, prescribe the procedure for determination of protected tenancy status and for recording entries in the tenancy register. While these functions are ordinarily carried out 110 CVB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Barch by the Tahsildar, tJre enabling provisitins of Sections 88 and 89 of the Tenanry Act, read with:the powers confCrred on Revenue Officers . under the Telangana Lard Revenue Ac! make it clear that superior \- off-rcers like the RDO or Collector exercising power under the Rules, 1950, are not divested of jurisdiction, p.4i"rrt".ly when exercising { delegated functions or acting upon specific judicial directions. g) The reasoning of the Joint collector in treating the RDo's report as lacking jurisdiction or evidentiary value is untenable. Thus it is held that the RDO acted within jurisdiction in accordance with law and the findings recorde&therein are uinaing subsequently in all proceedings emanated from the Tenancy Act. In view o[ the above discussion, the findings of the Joint Collector on this issue are scr asidc. 37 Issue No.cl whether respondents in cRp No.67o8l2oo3 have ^ the locus standi to contest the application of the petitioners therein for grant of sale certificate under section I 388 or 38A of the Tenancy Act or they may onry approach the civil court or other appropriate fonrm to canvass their rights, if any, in the property purchased by them? l t ! 4 CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch Findirres of tlre RDO: The RDO held that the respondents are third-p'arty prrrchasqrs and srtrangers to the original tenancy rights. They have no loczrs stantdi.lo oppose the grant of certificates under Sections 38-A or 38-E of Tenancy Act, and their remedy lies only before tlle civil court. .E'indinps of the Joint Collector: 'Ihe Joint Collector took a different view, stating that since tl:e respondents claim through sale deeds executed by both the landhotder and alleged tenants, they do have a right to question the grant of ownership certilicates. He further stated that as the subject land' is no longer governed by the Tenancy Act in view of G.O.Ms.No.183 dated 28.O4.2OOO, the appropriate forum would be the civil court and the f-rndings recorded by the RDO were held to be incorrer;t. iiil Eindines of this Court It is the case o[ petitioners that the respondents/purchasers a) being third-part5r purchascrs have no legs to stand to object the statutor), process iiritiated undcr the Tcnancy Act. It is submittFd that the respondents allegcd to have acquircd rights under registered sale der:ds purportedly executed by the landholders and some individuals stated to be protectcd tenants, but there was no valid or tt2 CVBR,J CRPNo.527920l6 & Barch lawful authorit5r shown in. favour of such transactions. The petitioners further argued that these sale transactions were related to plotting and layout development for residential purposes, which are outside the purview of the Tenanry Act. It is pointed out that under the statutory scheme, the benefits under Sections 38-A and 38-E of the Tenancy Act are strictly conlined to the relationship between the protected tenant and the landholder, and no third party or stranger can object to suclr proceedings. b) Whereas, it is the case of the respondents/purchasers that their claim is legitimate since the sale deeds were executed by the landowners and some alleged tenants, and thus they had acquired valid title. Atternatively, it is submitted that in view of G.O.Ms.No.l83 dated 28-O4-2OOO, the subject lands were reclassified for non- agricultural use and the Tenanry Act no longer applies to such lands. Therefore, the purchasers had the right to object to the issuance o[ certilicates under the Tenancy Act and Tenancy Tribunal is having jurisdiction to decide such issues. c) The RDO after considering the pleadings and records vide order dated 15.1O.2O13 held that respondents are third-party purchasers and strangers to the original tenancy rights. It was further observ'ed that respondents had no loctts standi to oppose the grant. of ownership certificates under Section 38-A or 38-E of the Tenancy Act. The RDo opined that any claim or right asserted by the purchasers n -----4.. ) il3 cvB&J CRP No.52792016 &Batch could be raised only before the competent civil court and not before the- revenue or Tenancy Tribunal. The Joint Collector, hourener, disagreed with the RDO and held that since the respondents had plrrchased tands through registered sale deeds from botl'. landholders and alleged tenants, they have the right to question the. grant of ovmership certificates. He further opined that in view of G.O.Ms..No.183 dated 28.O4.2OOO, which reclassified the land to a residential znne, the Tenancy Act ceased to app$, and hence; the gppr-op,riate remedy lies before the civil court. d) 'lhe Legislature enacted the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Validation) Act, 1961 retrospectively v.alidating the Tenancy Act, 1950 together with the arnendnients thereto. This validating Act of t96l received the assent of. ttre Presiderrt and was placcd in thc gttr sshsclule of the Constihrtion. The Governrnent issued G.O.Ms.No.3 clatcd Ol-O l-1g73 notiffing alt the Districtsr in Telangana under Section 38E for the purpose of stahrtory transfer of ownership to prcltcctccl tcnants. Section 97 conferred rule '99 barred the making power upon ttrc (iovernmcnt and Section jurisdiction of a civil Court t() scttle or decide or deal-with any question which is required to be scttlccl by the Tahsitdar, TribUnal or Collector or Board o[ Revenue or Government. Section 38 enables a protectecl tenant to purchase Ltre land holders interest in the'land held by t:he former as a protected tcnant. Sub-sections (2) to (8] of 114 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batdr o Section 38 prescribe the procedure for the exercise of the tight conferred upon the protected tenant to purchase the land holders interest in the.land. The restrictions imposed unddr sub-section (7) of Section 38 will not apply to sale by the landholder to a protected tenant by mutual consent, provided the price payable therefor is agreed to between them. Section 38A makes the restrictions imposed under Section 38 (7) inapplicable to cases of sale by mutual consent between the land holder and the protected tenant. Under Section 38E, the Government is empowerert to declare, by notification in the Gazntte in respect of any area and from sttch date as may be specified therein, that the ownership of all lands, held by the protected tenants which they are entitled to purchase from their land holders, stand transferred to and vest in the protected tenants. In respect of the land held by the protected tenant, the land owner can relinquish his right in favour of the tenant by executing sale certificate under Section 38A. e) In the cases on hand, this Court upon examination of the entire record finds that the respondents in these revisions are third- party purchasers claiming through registered sale deeds allegedly executed by the landholder and certain individuals stated to be protected tenants. However, no evidence has been placed on record to establish that the said vendors had lawful authority to alienate the lands. Moreover, the transactions are l3y-95 derrelopments and ,r I 15 CVBR"J CRP No.527912016 & Batch residential plot sales; which fall entirely outside the.purview of the Tenanry Act. Itiis settled law that proceedings undelr Sections 38.-A and 318-E of Tenancy Act are confined to the statutory relationshin between the landholder and the protected tenant. The respondents herein have no loczrs standi under the Tenancy Act to object statutory process. The Tenancy authorities cannot adjudicate Llpon the validity of sale deeds or deterrnine title or possession disputes arising out of private' conveyances. Further, the declarant /land owner has not denied the existence of tenants over the lands for their entitlement of tenar-rqy certificates. Once they are entitled for issuanqe gf tenancy cgrtificrrtes, on the consent of the owner/declarant, it is immaterial whether the certilicates issued are under Section 38E or Section 38A of the l\ct. Both the provisions confer ownership to ttre tenants and tJ:e saree is not incongruous with the object of the Tenancy Act. Therefor:e, the petitioners are entitled for issuance of certificates under Sections 38E and 38A of the Act. F\rrther, in Para 87 of thc common order dated 25.O2.2OL3 0 passed in CRP No.6708 of 2003 and batch, the Division Bench observec[ t]rat 'in the abserrce of all the sale deeds und.er which respondetnts 8 to 72 claim rigltt, title or interest in the lands purchased bg them being brought on record. iu is diJficult and inappropriate for this Court to examine the existence or ertent of the ights of tle respondents, under tlrc sale d.eeds". It is contended by the petitioners u6 CVBR,J cRP No.5279r2016 & Batch o that the sale deeds are uoid. ab initio for violation of Sections S8D.and 19 of the Tenancy Act, particularly because ,ro L.rja"nce was furnished to show compliance with the requirement under section 38D to offer the land to the protected tenant before alienating to third parties. The contention of the respondents that some of the tenants had joined as executants in the sale deeds also fails to meet legal scrutiny. In view of the nature of disputes concerning title, possession, and alienation, the questions relating to the -rights of the respondents whether they have purchased from the rightful owriers, and whether their vendors were in possession on the :date of ,, execution of sale deeds and whether those transactions arelthe issues that irre required to be adjudicared by the competent civil court d Further, the Joint Collecror having stated that in the given circumstances, the civil court n'olrld be the appropriate fonrh for the respondents to get Lhcir right acljudicated qua subject lands ought not have decided the validiry oi Lhe sale deeds. under the provisions of the Tenancy Acr, the revenue authorities are not conferred .with the power to dccldc thc validity or otherwise of the Registered Sale Deeds allegcd to have becn cxecuted in favour of the respondents and it is inappropriatc for this court to enter upon the disputed issues and if any observati<;ns arc made with regard to the validity or otherwise of the sale deeds, that w,ill have an impact over _th: nghts of the partics and as such, the parties are at liberty to LL7 CVBR,J CRP No.527912016 & Batch approach the competent Civil Court and seek approPriate relief, in accorclance witl:'law, if they are so advised. Thereforei the Iindings of :_ the Joint Collector with regard to t]re validity of the sale deeds is set aside ztnd the lindings of the RDO are upheld.

38. Issue No.Df Whether the order dated 9.12.L975 of the LRT deternrining the holding of the declarent Kastopa which has attained Iinality e:rtinguishes the rights of tte petitioners in CRP No.6708/2OO3, if any, under the Teriancy Act? and Issue ltto.Ef If the petitioners in CRP No.. 6VO8|2AO3 are found entitled to ownership certificates under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act, would their right to pdrchase under Section 38 or 38-A of the said Act get exhausted? ffi; Findinss of the RDO: The RDO held that despite the LRT proceedings, the petitioners' tenancy rights are not extinguished, and they are entitled to ownership certificates under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act for the land adrneasuring Ac.42.24 gts in Sy.Nos.Sl to 53 (part). The petitioner-s' rights prevail over the orders passed under the Ceiling Act. Fur::her, the RDO held that petitioners are eligible only [or ownershio certilicates under Section 38-E, not under Section 3B-A- ll8 cRPNo.52?er20,.3*ti O fil Findines of the Joint Ccllector: The Joint collector found that the protected tenants had r voluntarily surrendered their tenancy rights during 196566, and the same w€.s accepted and finalized by the Land Reforms Tribunal in its order dated o9.r2.l9zs. The petitioners did not challenge the finality of the said orders. consequently, the lands vested in t]:e Government, and t.l-e petitioners are estopped from asserting tenancy rights. The Joint Collector clarilied that Section 38-E resuits in statutory transfer of ownership by operation of law, while secrion 3g-A is contractual. .since the two are mutually excrusive, once rights are acquired gnder Section 38-E, no certificate can be granted under Section 3g-A for the sar.ne land. The RDO's findings were thus set aside. ifil D'indings of this Court a) upon a comprehensi,e analysis of the pleadings, docurnents, and the legal flramework govt-.rning protected tenancy under the Tenancy Act, this court fincls rhar rhc rights of the petitioners over the lands situated in Survcy Nos.5 t, s2, and S3(part) of Gachibowli village were not exringuished b.y. rtre order dared og.l2.lgzs passed by the Land Reforms Tribunal unclcr the coAH Act, 1973. Although the LRT's order has attaincd tinality under the ceiting Act, it cannot override the statutory rights vcstcd in protected tenants under the lt9 CVB&J CRP No.5279DAl6 &Batch q Tenancy Act, 1950. This Court is o{. the view that the proceedings beforr: the Land Reforms Tribunal. primarily dealt with the holding of the declarant, M/s. I(astopa Corporation, and the declaration of surpltrs lands under ifie Ceiling Act. There is no evidence of any adjudrcation made therein regarding valid surrender by the petitioners in accordance with Section 19 of the Tenancy Act. In [act, the RDO in his detailed enquiry report categorically found thar no valid s -rrrender had taken place in respect of Survey Nos. 51, 52, and

53. While surrender proceedings of the year 1965-66 may pertain ro other survey numbers like 37, 40, 42,43, and 47, there is no record of surrt:nder under Section 19 concerning the subject lands. As per the statutory scheme, for a surrender to be valid under Section lg, it must be in writing, voluntafily made, and duly accepted by the Tahsildzrr. The RDO's report clearly states.that no such procedure rvas [<rll':wed in respect of Survey Nos.51 to 53. Furthernrore, the rc'p()rt acknowledges that the petitioners or their predecessors-in- irrtt'rcst were declared protected tenants trnder Section 37-A of thc Tcnancy Act in the year 1958 and these entries continuc to stand unlt:ss letwfully altered through p{oceedings under the Act. Even thougtr proceedings under the Ceiling Act have concluded and the larrcl ardnreasuring Ac.lsV.l7 guntas in different survey numbers stcrod vesl.ed in the State, tl.e lands in S'urvey Nos. 51, 52, ancl part of 53 rernained unaffected, as no valid surrender or relinquishment of eo* 120 cvBR J CRP No.527912016 & Barch a) protected tenancy rights was proved in respect of these {ands.. The conclusio. dt"*t'by the Joint Collector that the petitioners' tenancy rights stood extinguished due to the finaligr of the LRT,s order is not sustainable. It is also relevant to note that under Sections 33 and 104 of the Tenancy Act, read with section 2g ofthe coAH Act, 1923, the Tenancy Act enjoys an overriding effect in respect of matters enumerated under List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Thus, in matters concerning tenancy, including surrender, the Tenancy Act would prevail. A careful reading of sections 33, 34, and 38-E makes it evident that ownership rights under section 3g-E would vest in the protected tenant on the notified date, even if the tenant was not in physical possession, provided there was no valid surrender under Section 19 and the tenant had not lost status under sections 32 or 44. rn the present cases, there is no proof of such loss or disqualification. Therefore, this court holds that the tenancy rights of the petitioners over the lands in survey Nos. 5 r, s2, and 53 are intact and not extinguished by the LRT proceedings or orders passed under the Ceiling Act. Their rights are traceable independently to the Tenancy Act and are entitled to protection thereunder. Accordingly, these issues are answered in favour of the revision petitioners/ tenants. ,..---''---'-1 l2r CVB&J CRP No.5279DOl6 & Batch

39. Issue .No.Ff Is !t perm$sible in law to grant of a joint certificate either under Sectt6n 38-E or Section 38-A of the Tenantcy Act to several persotts claiming to be protected B tenants? lrindings of'the RDO: 'l'he RDO held that tttoi rs no prchibition in lau to issue of Joint Ownership CertifiNte tl/s 388'of Tenancy Act to Protected. tenants and their legal heirs who are tLE petitioners SI.Nos. .t ,3,5,6,12,L3 @1d 20 to 3O herein, duly following the procedure formulated tlereirf Fi:ndines of the .troip:t Collector: Ttre Joint Collector hgld.that ."!here rls no prohibition und,er the Act for ir;suance of Joirtt ertiftmte unde.r-section 38-E or under section 3B-A tn fauour of seueral Wrsons daiming to be protected tenants, prouided ttrc requirement of respediue prouisions are satisfied." iiil Firrdinss of this Coutt: i]) Ttx: report submitted by the RDO is based on an cnquiry conclucte,l in strict compliance with the directions issued in W.P.No.4l>9O of 1980. [n the said writ petition, the lcarned Single .Jurdgc of this Court had specifically directed the District Collector, Hy-{crabarl, or an oflicer not below the rank of RDO to conduct an t22 cvB&J CRP No.527912016 & Barch - enquiry to ascertain thb protected tenanry status of the tenants.and related issues, including any lawful surrender of tenancy rights. Pursua,nt to such directions, tha RDO/Deput5r Collector conducted \ enquiry and submitted report dated 27.or.lg8l. The said report had been accepted in w.P.No.4059 of lg82 and subsequently aflirmed by a Division Bench in w.A.No.l42o of l9BT. No appeal was preferred thereafter, rendering the said lindings final and binding on all parties, including the Government. The RDo/Deputy collector rook into consideration the voluminous documentary evidence and concluded that the petitioners/protected tenants and their predecessors were in continuous possession of the lands in Sy.Nos.Sl to 53 (part) from the year r95o as protected tenants and had not surrendered their tenancy rights in terms of section tg of the Terrancy Act. The RDO further stated that the notil-rcation issued under G.o.Ms.No.183 MA dated 24.o3.2ooo, classifying the rands as rcsidential, cannot retrospectively extinguish or nullify the protccted tcnancy rights vested under the Tenancy Act. It was further recordecl that thc reclassification of the lands under the Urban Arcas (Development) Act, 1975, for improvement of town planning schcmcs, cannot denude the accrued tenancy rights that were crystatlized dccades earlier under a special statute intended to confer sccurity of tenure of tenants as agrarian reforms and eventual ownerstrip to cultivating tenants. It is to be seen that even before the issuance of i_,. (' t23 CVBR,J CRP No.5279DOl6 &Batch notifi,cation vide G.O.Ms..No.183 dated 28.O4.2OOO, the tenants are contesting the cases by Iiling various cas€s from'tJre year 1980 onwa:ds and any noti{ication issued subsequently would only operate prosprlstively and the same cannot be applied retrosPectively for I pending cases/claims. b) With respect to the loczrs standi of respondents, the RDO found them lo be third-party purchasers and they have no independent rights. [t was held that they are strangers to the proceedings initiated under the Tenamcy Act and not entitled to object for issuance of ownership or sale certificates under Sections 38-E or 38-A of the Act to the protected tenants. If the titte has been validly transferred in their firvour, they are entitled to agitate their claims before the appropriate forum but not under the provisions of Tenancy Act, which rvould strictly govern the relationship between the landlord and the tenants. The RDO also noted that there is no legal bar for issuancr: of joint ownership certificates under the provisions of the Tenancy Act to multiple tenants who are jointly cultivating the lands or their legal heirs, provided the requisite statutory conditions are fullllled. , c) The Government of Hyderabad has enacted "Record of Rights in Land Act", Act No.t of 1347 Fasti (L937 AD) which is applicable to the erstwhile HEH Nizams Dominions and Hyderabad Record of Rights i I t : l I I I , t ! t I ! j I i i I I t24 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch r') La.nd Regul.ations, 1357 Fasli (1949 A[i). Under the provisions of said Regulations, notification was' issued by -the Government of .- Hyderabad, Revenue Department und.er Section a(1) of Hyderabad Record of Rights in Land Regulations, 1358 Fasli for preparation and maintenance of record of rights. The Division Bench of the High Court reported in Mglatzm Larctuitah as. Nafeesunniscr Begumt37, taking into account of the final record prepared under the Hyderabad Land Census Rules, gave a finding that the said final record (Khasra Pahani) as "Record of Rights" 4nd the said Regulations were extended to all the villages of erstwhile State of Hyderabad and thc same continued till the formation of . State of Andhra Pradesh on Ol. t i .1976. The Land Census is definecl in Rttle 2(fl of Land Crensus Rules, l954and includes the names of all interested persons so lar as thcv are in actual enjoyment of their interest. Rule 2(e) dcfines "ullercstcd person" as a person who has or who claims to havr: anv intt:rcst in land either as a land holder, occupant, mortgilgec, assigncc or rent, tenant or otherwise. A conjoint reading o[ 'intr:rcstecl pt:rson' and 'Land Census' of thg Land Census Rules, it is cvident that namcs of all persons who are in actual enjovment of thcir interc'st whether as a landholder'br as tenants are registerecl holder as pcr the Khasra Pahani. The analysis of the above u,oukl imply that all persons who are in actual enjo5rment/possession are entitled for '''ll.R lgTl AI, 652 I (-', r25 cvBR.J CRP No.5279 t2}l6 & Batch gr-ant <lf joint tenancy rights, since their nalnes have begn reflected in the Pahanies prepared under the said Regulations. Thirefore, there is ho interdiction for recognizing joint tenancy rights under the provisions of TenancY Act. d) Ftaving regard to the above legal and factual analysis, this Court is satisfied that the findings recorded by the RDO are well- founded, in accordance with law. Accordingly, this issue is answered'

40. Issue- xo.c) whether the sale deeds relied uPotl by tle responrlents 8 to 72 in CRP No.67O8l2OO3 are violative of sectior. 38-D of the Act and if so, whether the sale deeds are void? Fi.ndinss of the RDO: Ttre RDO held that the satc deeds are executed in violation of Section 38-D of Tenancy Act, since the protected tenancy rights were not extirr.guished by foltowing thc procedure. Accordingly, objections raised try respondents wcre rejected, and they were advised to approach civil court, for redre ssal of their grievance, if necessary' Findings of the Joint Collector: The Joint collector founcl that the sale deeds were jointly executed by the landholder and the alleged protected tenants' Hence' the tenants had waived their rights under Section 38-D' Therefore, I , I f i i i t26 cvB&J CRP No.5279l20t6 & Batch the sale deeds al.e not void and the hndings recorded by RDo were set aside. iiil Fiadings of thls Cburt: a) As evident from ttre record, on lz.3.Lgzs, several individuals claiming to be protected tenants filed an objection petition seeking ownership rights under section 38-E of the Tenancy Act. b) when a provisional tist of protected tenants was prepared under Rule 4(l) of the Rules, several persons claiming tenancy rights filed a petition before the Land Reforms Tribunal (LRT) claiming rhe rights on the subject lands. The LRT even though recorded compromise of thc tcnants and declarant-Kastopa corporatron and the said compromise is not valid in view of Section 33 of the Tenancy Act. when the Government issued G.o.Rt.No.594 dared 2o.o4.lg7g granting lease over the portion of the subject lands, the tenants filed w.P.No.4590 of 1980, wherein this court directed ro conducr an crrquiry by the Collector or any of the officer not below the rarrk o[ RDo. The RDo (second Taluqdar/Deputy collector) being rhe competent authorit5r under Rule 12 of the Tenancy Rules, 19.50 is conflerred with power to-revise the provisional tenancy register, has submitted a report dated 22.or.19g1 stating that there is no'alid surrender of lands by the Tenants in favour of pattadars/declarant (Kastopa corporation, vendor of the rFsposq:-nts herein). Thereafter t27 cvB&J CRPNo.5279DOl6 &Batr,il. W.P.Irto.4O59 of t982 was filed for declaring the protected tenants in r:esper:t of lands in Sy.Nos. Nos.37, 40, 42, 43, 44, 4,5, 46,47,5L,52 and 153, admeasuring Ac.157-O3 guntas situated at Gachibowli Villag:. The learned Single Judge relying on the RDO report dated 27.O7.1981, allowed the said writ Petition vide ordbr dated

15.07. Lg87 and directed the respondents therein to grant certificateg .und,er Section 38-E o[ Tenancy Act in respect of lands admeasuring Ac.73.rl3 gts and permitted the petitioners therein to file applications under Section 38 of the Tenancy Act, before the RDO'. Chafl'enging the sarne, the State has lrled Writ Appeal No. L42O o{ lgflV, wherein the Division Bench upheld the orders of the learned Single Jrrdge and the report of the RDO dated 27.O7.1981. The Division Be4ch i!:CRP No.62O;3 of 2OO3 and batch vide order dated 25.O2.2Ot3 directed the .. origtnal authority/RDO to decide the validity of the RDO repo:t dated

27.Oi.1981. Admittedly, pcncling adjudication of the tenancJr rights, Kastopa. Corporation <iisposed o[ the propert5r in favour of respondents in these rcvisions/purchascrs during the years 1986 to

1989. ilhe Kastopa Corporation/cleclarant, while disposing the property in favour of atleged purchasers, has not follorred tlte procedu:r€ as mandatcd unclcr Scclion 38D of the Tenancy Act. The extract of the Tenancy Register o[ surrender would show that t]re SUrrendr:r was not in accordance with procedure prescribed' Under Section 19 of the Tenancy Act- The judgments retied upon by the ,u'o -- -- t28 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2015 & Batch o {- learned counsels would emphasize that unless ttie proc€dure under Sections 19 and 38D of the Tenancy Act has been followed by the pattadar, the alleged sale deeds does not confer any right, pending adjud,ication of the lis between the landlord and the tenants. c) For better appreciation of the above provisions, the summar5r of relevant case laws are extracted below: i) ln Kotaiah v. Propertg Assn. of the Baptist Churches @) Ltd..'s case (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme observed as follows: "79. *ction 38-D reads: 38-D. Proedure when tandholder intends to sell land to a protected tenant.4ll If the landlolder at ang time intends to sell tl@ land held bg tle protected tenant, he sholl gtue a notice in writing of his intention to s;ach protectcd tenant and offer to sell the land. to him- In use the protectcd tenant intends to purclwse tle land, he shall intimate in utriting his readine,ss to do so within six months, from the date of the reeipt of s.uch notice. If there is any dispute about tte rea.sonoble prie payable bg the proteded. tenant for tte land, the provisions of sttb-sedions (3) to (81 of Sedion 38 slull applg mutatis mutandis. (2) If the protected tenant does not exercise the rtght of purchase in response to tle notice giuen to him by the landlalder under sttb-section (1) such protected tenant slwtl forfeit his righf of purchase of the same and the land.latder shall be entitled to sell such land to ang other person. On such a purchase bg ang other person, the protected tenant shallforfeit all hi.s rights in the land saue those provid.ed for in Section 41.

22. In surn.-., $) fhe protected tenant has a rigltt to become full owner of the lands tn fus possessron. He becomes the owner when the Gouernm.e.nt rssues a tatiftmtion under &ction 38-E. We are told that tle Gouernment had r'ssued such a rctificatian on l-lo-1973, relating to tte di,strid uhere the lands in question are situated. It was about three gurs earlier to termination of the appellants' tenancA bg the Association- If the appellants hod a right to become ou)ners of the tenanted land.s, tle question of tenninating tleir tenancA would not arise. (y) The protected tenant cannot be dispossessed iilegailg bg the londtord or angbody else. If so disposses sid., the Tehsildar either suo nafit or on application must ttold a summary enquiry, and. dtrcd that the t ..4- -. I t 129 CVB&J CRP No.5279DOl6 &Batdl ktttd. be restored to the prcteded tenant. Tlwt is tle mondate of Sution 3 8-E ortd. tte Eryltanation tlereof. $iil fhe bndlotder bg hfunsetf annot dr'spossess the protleAdbnant ,e,,rcn if tle tenancg i.s terminated in owrdanre, with the laut. the kttdtord uilt hate to take re@urse to Section 32. He mtst apprcoch tte T,zh.sildar to ltold an enqtiry and pass such order as'fte d.eems fil (iu) *ction 38-D prothibits ttw landlwlder from alienating thetenantd bn; io third. parties. If tle landl,otder intends to sell'tlle lan4, he mr25;t gWe riritie in uitittg of his intention to the protected tenant. The first offer mu.st be given to the protected tenant. It is onlg when the prctdd tenanfi does not-exercise the right to purchase, the landholder auld sell tle lond. to third parties. Tle alienatio,n made in contravention of these prcuisiorts fuvs no legal effect. ii) ln B.Bal Reddg vs. Teega.la Naragana Redtdgls case (supra), the Ho:nble Supreme Court, observed as follows: ,4. Tle appeuanls preferred appeals challenging the aforesaid orders dated 2Ti-2O04 and 13-7-2OO4. By a common order daled 22-7-2OO6; tfu; Joint collector-ll, Ranga Reddy District allowed ttese oppe.ol.s. As regards the loans standi of the appellants to challenge tle afore,said o;rclers, it wcrs hetd. thrltt tlrc appeltants were r,rlitlrrlr the origilwl lartdltotders nor the protected tenants and as such had no loans s/randi in tlla. matter- Euen after recording such finding, tle Joint C;ollefror-Il" Ranga Raidg District proeeded to consider the merits of the tnatter. It utas obs;erued. that itaugh Teegata Shiuaiah was the proteded. tenant in res.oect of tlrc said land, tle proceedings granting succession infawur of tle respondents utere not sustainable o"s there was ra evidene about sut,sistence of protected tenancy ns on the date wlrcn tle protected tenznt died. and that since long tinte lwd elapsed sine his demise, succession could not be deterrmrrcd. It was also held tltot tle Mandial Rev'enue Officer was not competer.t to recognise successtbn to tenanq. "6. The respondents had. also prefenecl Ctutl Reuision Petitisn No. 4904 of 20A'6 against th.e order dated 22 7'2006 by which order grunting restoration taas set aside. Ihis revrsion petition was allowed bg the High c.ourt uide its judgment ond or<kr [Teegala Naragana Reddy u. B. Bal Reddy, 2010 scc. onLine AP I t03l under appeal- Tle High court obserued. that transaction of sale bq llrc ongtnal landholders infawur of thirtt parties of agriculturol lartd ttrrcler the Lnldw of-a protected tenant was @ntrqry to theprouisions of section 38 D of the Ad and. a,s s1.tch the appellate oi**Aty n a agntty fowrrl that the present'appetlants hod ttp loan.s standi in the matter. It was fitrllwr obserued tlnt there uta's no euid.ence to show that tte prot<:ctecl tenant had ever sutend.ered his prot?cted tenancy or that he was eutcted under section 19 of the Act and- as r;uch the pitected tenancy tt,ould continue despite -tle death of proktcted. tenant qnd. the rights in lftat belwlf deuolved on the sucoessors. 'Relging on tle decision of the l\ill l]enclt of ttle Andhra Pradesh High Coi1in Sad6- v. Tehsild.ai I AIR t988 AP 77 : (1987) 2 An LT 749 : 1987 scc onLine Ap 1g4 it was held ttrctt no linitation or adverse possession coulcl be raised against the protectecl tenancg- It was further obserued that the respondints being lbgal l:,r;rs and lineol blood desendants of t30 cvB&J CRPNo.52792016&B*h (\_ ---. tle protded tennnl" tleg were entitled to seek restnration o/possdssrbn Wlththis uieur, tle High Court alloued. Ciuil Reuision Petition No. 49O4 of ' 20o6and.re$oredtheorderdated 13-7-2OO4. Stmilar ord.ers uere passed restoring orders grdnthry possession in reqect of Ciuil Reuision Petitions Nos. 447 and 448 of 2OO7. / '9. Sclc/fbn 38-D of the Act prescribes the proedure to be folloud, when landlalder interd.s to sell the land held bg a proted,ed tcnant. Afurdfuglg, the tand must first be offered bg issuing a notice in unitittg to the proteded tenant and it is only when the protected tenant dcrvs trrt exercise tte ight of purchose in accordance with the prcdute, thnt. tle landlalder can sell such land to anA other persoru Tle effd of this proui,sion and. non- compliance thereof was ansidered in Kotailzh u. Prcpertg Assn o/ Baptist by this Court Churches (P) Ltd (1989) 3 SCC 4241 and.it uas laid dowru (SCC pp. 431-32, para 22) '22. (iu) *:c,tion 38-D prohibits the landholder from aliMittg thb tenotrted land to third parties. If the landtolder intend.s to *ll t E land" he nust give notice in writing of his intention to the protectd. terpnf'-The first olfer myst be giuen to th.e protected tenant. It i"s onlg uheq tle prctedad tenant does not exercise the right to purchase, tlrc landlolder auld. selt the land to third par7les. The alienation made in a nttantention of these prorzsions hr,s no legal effect. '70. ft rls nof tle case of the appellants that alienations effdd. bg tle landlulders u)ere in conformity tuith the aforesaid provbion The appellate autharity was therefore nght in lwlding that tte priz*nt oppellarfis had. no loans standr. It, howeuer, erred in ansideriry tly merits of the matter despite haurg rendered such a findings ontlie issue of loats standi- ln our uietu, ctll trensactions entered inlo wttluut fofiouting tlte procedure prescnbecl in section 38-D of the oct are uitlaut ang lesal effect as held in kotaiah cc.se. " iii) The Hon'ble Supremc Court in Thota Sridlrrrr Reddg os. Manda.lg. Rotm;allommcr's case (supra) held as under: , "97. This Court in Bal Reddy qtrcted with approual the RtlI Berch 14 jldgment in Sada as u'ell ns llrt: carler ludgment of this Court in Kotaiah to llold that protected ternrtctl coukl be terrninated onlg in a flutnner lotoun to lau.t. In tlue absettct' ctf such ualid termination of "protected tenantcg", the interesl of such ltrote'cte.<l tertant continttes to be oprerdiue and subsisting in lctto ancl cottlrl deuolue on his legal heirs and. rq)resentatiues who cctulcl lhe:rt claur restoration o;f possession- As laid daun in Sada euen tf tlu: protectecl tenant had lost possession, witlaut "t|trrc being ualid tenninetrcn of his status as a protected tenant, h.e still be entitled to all rrv:i<lettts of protection under the Ad.. '

32. We sholl now exemtrct tlle respec.tiue contentions of the panties in vieut of the lqw laid dou'rt atrcl also the judgment of tte High Couri in fudo.I4 which has sloorl the test of time for last more than 3O gears. The sdleme of the Act contained ur Cltaltter M of the Tenancy Act in resped, of tenants souerned bs ..--...-..-:y::::-.tenant is matenattu lifferert f^:y'of l3l CVBR,J CRP No.5279t2ol6 & Batch C'hapter III of tle Tenoncg Ad. The.protectedterruntts ate ptaed at much hrglter pdestat a.s even if a prcteitea bi;nt is ttot iri possessron of tle lcLnd" right lw^s ben giuen b him to seek possession lotey. Tlerefore, np-itler Srr/;ion 79 nor tia-ction 32 formhg'put of Chnptu III of tte Ttznancy Ad ore appliablein resped of protrcled. tenantuept uhen tlrc re:ferene i.s made to tle proui,sions of *d;ion 19 on the basis of &ction 3t?-E(5) which starts utithanon obstante datse gtuing oveniding eff*t to anrything ontained in Siertion 38-E. Sttch clause mandates tle blledor to lwld an ertqriry suo motu to a,sertain the genuineness'of the surrender oJ right made bg the proteded tenant. Thi.s exercise had to be dorrc before the sunender of terutrcg rights and not subsquently afier manu years of all.eged surrender on the strength of.unqual bargaining power with tlrc tenant wln.suruiues ontle ba.si.s of agricttlfiral adiuities. 3ti- The purchasers hanrc relied upon tle oral surrender of protected tertarrcg in tle gear 1954. Such surendbr of ortzl tenanqg of a prctected tenant is not permissible under the Tenancg Act except in the manner wltich is prescrtbed under *ction 38-E(5) reod with *ction 19 of tlrc Tetancy Act. fiill further, the proteded tenont has a right to seek po.ssessron in term,s of *c/;ion 36 of tle Tenancg Ad,. Duen in term"s of Ser:fion 38-D, if the landlald.er intend.s to sell tle land which is in por;session of a proteded terwnt, lE hos to give a notie in writirq of his intention to sttch protected. ternnt.'

48. The appeals ailegedg filed bg tle protected tenant against tle grant of omtpancy rights ertifimle and stbsequently being withdrawn is uhcllg inconsequential as afrEr tle grant of oumership ertiftcate in terms of Section 38-E of the Tenancg Aet, the protected tenants are deemed to be owners. Otrce the proteded tenants are deemed to be owners, there could not be ang offitpatry rQrus certificate as the purchasers were diwzsted of tleir ownership bg virtue of the grant of ownership certificate unaler Sectron 38-E of the Tenancg Act. Such certiftcate was also rtot disputed by the purcha.sers. Therefore, title of the protected tenants is complete and tlrc ownership unambiguously orests with them.

49. Now we stnll examine tlrc ocatparrcg rights certificate granted to the purchasers in tle year 1982. Tlere was no right with tle purchaser to clahn occttpancy rigltts on the ba"sis of possession s.incn l-I I-1973 upon sunender of protected tenancg rights. If tlv surender of protecled tenancA righls is not in acenrdance with the mandate of the statute, the pos-.;ession from 1-11-1973 would be inconsequential as such possession would not af,fect tlw riglr/,s of tle protected tenant who is entitled to stafidory protection- In fad, the grant of C,ertiftcate unequiuocallg transkrs ownership rights to the. protected tenant.

52. 'lhe protected tenant stnll be entitled to restoration of possessron in tenns of Explanation to Section 38-E(l) read with Section 32 of the Tenancy Act. Tlrc Talsildar to ensure that the possesston ts delivered to tlrc protected tenant within 3 months. 132 CVB&J CRP No.5279l20t6 &barch r-) iv) .In the case of A. No'a.simha, t s. A. Krtshna. (supra), ip was observed as follows: ..18-.$far_a" the first contention is mnerne4 it needs to be noted.thar Y r@b of a protuted. tenant can, in no way, be defeated, ete-pt with his participation, and by ad.herence to ile reriant poir*i"i oytau.luto rwgnized modes of termination of tenancg or", Ag "urnrrd", under Srlcfion^l9, and., puichase of the b7a, Og the protecied. tenant_ him^self, lte of the tand of any land couerea Ug lantdholdcr rs creairy prohibited. - ina., secrron a&D tP:y?y*!. ProperT_s_ Asso,cfron of the Baptist Cnuri6'-prrt-ii, (1989) 3 scc 424 : AIR 1g8g sc t7s3t, Nobodg pbaded tttatthere ua.s ang a*render of tenancg. Ilence, it r's not n"ceisary to deat -*n-*-t qspect. -protect"a torid't-";

20. The sale qurd certainry haue been objected to, bg fie pp1a1a4 tenant olhi" lqar representatiues, sincc the sate, infauoi sfriiJi,*- of a tand. overed bg protected. tenancy, is prohibitei. under *dion sg-D. Houte,er, otrce tte protected tenant i^t.y *roted. the iiwsatfor sate, 'paid tte unsideration and had obtaineaihe sate a."a itaww oy ii hp so1g, fotally different consequences wilr ensure. veera'Mallaiaiuas aliue.till 1969, i.e. for a period. of 17 years afier the sale. sirrrx- tt- l"; a ntirutd to be und.er the possession-and eiiogment rf tt "ir;;ia;il and. the sale uas at his irrstance, he did rai object'to tle same. Tte to examine- the tnpact of non-obs"rri* of tlte-p";;;; Wf prescribed. under sub-seajons (S), (6) and (7) of Section 3g, rcad utith St"lion 38-A of the Act does not anse, sirtce trte iare was "riirrr"r;rli-ir the tenant himself, but in the narne o/tris son and. nominee. "r 23- The possession of ttrc rarur trcrd by a protected tenant, or his l.egal rqtresentatiue, is required to bt: restored, irrespectiue of fie time {ap Yry.n the date of d,sltctssessrorr anri c)ate of ippricatioi und.er *dion 32-. -Howeuer, if the poss€?ssro, Ls erryoged-bg a'thira parta, as of rigllt, uith tl* aquiescence and npprrrol of i protectia tZnant, or his suo@ssors, such restorafiorr rs tntJtenrissible. It is not as if tte-principle o!*pp:l and acquiescence are not ctpphcable to the pron"ailrg" rnai try 4d- If a protecred tenant rirnserf ticructs a 3rd pang rntopossessdon of tlrc propertg, or, is a parTq to a'transaction, d.irectry"o, ti.dtraag, yoi sudttrarsfers, he cannot turn around and fail back on"*,j,to,-

24. If such a course of actiotr rs pennrssib le, the u.thole o,bjed of the Ad beames defeated anri be:contes i toor n the hands of indiscrimiltde wr:sons, to take innocent purchasers for a ncle. once it rwd emerged.that tl* sale of the lund. bg the ranclrtorclir m the ryear t 9s2 to,oi plae at tle ,1nstutc: of the protectecr tetrctnt, rinserf, ancr-'the purchaser i norn ofier tlan tle 9on of the protectecl tenarfi, the tan<t;";"; ; ;";""" ;;, d,a{yieristics of tenancy. The sale of ttrc ranrl tn 1ouou, oj ispondents 6 and 7, with he knowred-ge and appiotar of the pLtition"r'ai)ous nimto seek ang remedg under Sectron J). 133 CVBR,J CRP No.5279 l2O I 6 & Batch v) tn the case of Rq: Kfsirurrt Pershgd. and others tts. Joint Collecttor, R.R.Ixstrict antd otthers (supra), the erstwhite High Court . of Andhra Pradesh, observed as follows: "4. The Terwnrcg Tributtol afier tokittg inta co,rrs;ideration the. tenancy re,=ord if auailable ond afier lal4@ summor! erquiry in respect of tlrc Iands allegedly lald bg ptotdd tenants slmll prepare a provisional list in Fornrl slwwing tle tuunes of the protdctl trlnants to whom tte land is deem.ed to tnve beentransfM.undcr Sqtion 38-E (see Rule a(I). After prrzparation of tle provtsional lisf fn Form-[, the Teruncy Tribunal shall iss'ue notice inuiting objdbtts tuitlcn 75. dags from thE date of publication by cattsing tle provtsional list qfircd on the notice board of tfui village Cluuidi or other olls;pianus plare in the uillage. The proeedings upto tle pyblimtion of ptouisionol list is tte first stage. The se<:ond stage i.s as per Rrtle 4(3), The Ttibutlol afier hearing tte objections if cng from a landlord, a lond. liolder or a rivol prctected tenant or anA other interested person and mikittg furtler enqriry as fs necessary may with or without modifteificins pt*rcnaSnatlist u.thich shalt be affixed on the notie board of ttillage Chauidi or other onspianous place. The final list of protected tenants prqared ond prl},lished under Rule 4(3) ts the basis for issuing a ertifl.lcloite undef Secfion 38-E(2) which is the conclusiue evidene of the pwtded tetry.l luuirtg become the owner of the land with effd from the date of erttftcr,te. In this conrcrt it Is a/so nec,?ssary to mention thot Srrlion 2(a), .2(c), *ction 5 Section 34 an<t Section 37-A of the Tenanq Ad, orntoin a$ficient guidelines as to the nature of tle erquiry at the stage of prqaration of provisional list as well as the final list under Rule 4 of the Tenanty Rtrles. The Tenancy Tnburtal slta.tl haue to talce into a nsideration tle relevant factors as per the Tentncg Act while prqadng tle ftul li$ of protected tenants for tlrc- puryose of issting of eftifimie urder uqtion 38-E(2).

5. In the present case, tlte Tenanry Tribuul, tle 2"d respondent lrcretr prepared o provi"sional list under fule 4(l) and (2) and. publislvzrl tlu, same on 10-1-1975. In tfui m.eanuthile, the Andhra Prqdesh Lturcl Reforms (Ceiling on Agrianlturat Hotdings) Act, 1973 (hereafter callecl 'ttv, Lanct Reforms ActJ ame ilrdo.fore wdth ellect from l-l'1975. 'llre' A<:t prolt;brts any person fum holding agrkrultural land ht excess of otrc staruTard hotding as defined under *dion 5 of tle Land Refom ts Act ,4 s late Naragana Prasad, the grandfdher of tle petitioners u;as outncr ol. more than Ac.3SO-OO ogfianlfifial land in Mdcttql, Han Kisho.n Prosacl. father of petitioners fild. a dedatatian under Section I of tle Act T'|rc l,and Reforms Triburwl, which is disttnct from tte Tertancy Tnburrcil under the Tenancy Ad, initiated proeedings under &ctiorr 9 reul u,itlr Rule 4 of the Andlwa Pradesh land. Reforms (Ceiling ort Agncultunil Hotdtngs) Rules, 1974 (lerafier refened as 'La nd. Refomts Rrrles'/. Rulet 4 of th,z Land Reforms Rules @nkmpldes verification by Tah-silclar Qrul publil:atton of the declaration ry 7. In :he nteanwhile, afier musing uerification as required under Rule' 4 of tlrc Lrznd. Reforms Rules, the Land. Reforms Tribunal by order dotecl 20 bg ile dedarant. 134 cvB&J CRP No.5279l2016 & Barch (r 10-1976 dctermined tle totat &ent of talding for tte pwpo* of Lo.rd. Reforms Ad. Before t E land. Reforms Tribunal, Raj Hari Kislun frasqd. ailqdlg gaue d statenrcnt statirq tlut lE has ra objdionfor grant of paltas to the prcteted. tenants under &ction 38-E of the Tenanq Act exept to tnto tena,nfs,. The total utent of the lottd. in o,s mang as 16 distiltct surueu rutm.berc um.e to Acs. I 74-og. As late Hari Kislui pra.sad. obfucted to granting pattas in respect of tand auered bg SV.lVos. g5g and 859 infawur of Jeed*innla Eraioh and Kaiki Lingaiah admeasurtng an ertent of Acs.23-13, upholding sttch objection" tle Land. Reforms TYibunal determined Acs. 150-96 as being in the [email protected] of proluted tenants and. also observed tlut in respect of tle land in the strueg numbers mentiored, pattas utere granted to protee:ted teno/nts under secfibn 38-E(2). Afier aleleting Acs.l50-96 which uas found. to be in firc possession of protected tenants, the land Reforms Tribunal, qpoftiorrcd Ac" 102-35 cents each eEtd to 2.0595 standard ltoldings to tuto sons o-f late Naragana Prasad" and lauing regard to the tun major sons of Hai Kis&nn Prasad arcluded that the tand in *rc told@ of Hari Kislnn Prasad rs not fn excess of eciling area as on 1-l-l9TS. Thi"s ord.er has becomefinal and. no material is plared eitler before tle Tenancg Tribunat or Tenancy Appellate Autlwritg to shou ttwt any appeat was fited agoinst the order of the Land. Reform"s Tribunal dated 2o-lo-1926 under Secfibz 2O of the Land Reforms Act. Be it noted tlut if the land in possessron of protuted tenants is not excluded Hari Kishan pra.sad would be holding in excess of the ceiling area

22. C.oming to the case on l,and., a reading of the order dated 20-10-19Z6 passed bg tle land. Reforms Tibunal shorus that it deteted./exctttded an etdent of Ac, 1 5O-96 fiom the holding of Han Kistun prasod, tle father of tlv petitionas on th.e strength of the statement ma.de by tte declarant that an ertent of Ac. 174-09 is in possession of the tenants ard. that tw lns no objection for grant of pattas to protected terrants under sectrbn 38- E excqt for tuo persons. The said order hauing beame finat, thc father of the petitioners or the. petitioners claiming through him are not.entitled. to go back and contest the proceedings before the Tenancg Tibwnt. In fact, in a ca.se where the Land Refonns Tribunal determined tle holding of a declarant bg giving the benefit of exclusion/deletion of tlrc land. in possessron of the protected tenqnts, there would be no neessity agatn to conduct enqtiry either under Rule 4(1) or Rule ap) of the Tenancg Rules for preparation of final list of the protected tenants- In such a case, the Tenancg Tribunal can euen straight away issue certfiates to tlrc protected ternnts under Section 38-8, (21of the Tenancy Act-

23. sri P-M. Gopal Rao, leamed counsel for the protected tenants submifs *,at *e doctrine of res judicata applies to the proeedings before tle Tenanrcg Tribunal and tlut tlrc petitioners are estopped from taking a stand antrary to the stand taken by tlrcir predecessor-in-.dtk"before tle Land Reforms TribunaL Tlnt the cloctrine of res judicata oppties to proeedings under Land Reforms LegisLation o.nd. the doctine oj estoppel ?pplt:d to the proeedings before the Tenancy Tribunal is uelt settled Wq y_o2ition (see y.S. Cha.rati u. Hussein Nhanu Jamadar, MANU/sc/0732/ 1998 : AIRtgggsct4gS ). Therefore, it i.s not necessarg to elaboratetg deal with tte case law touching upon the subjecL 135 CVBR,J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch :24. It is, ttouteuer, n@ssqry t4 ,efa !9 W@y!!Y Patil u' Deuram Girdtnr patit, *axiTiio-szgtiggs : lieeslzgcnt$. : :! uhich ttrc ,;;f;; ri ;;*.nirr;"-;g* iro .r1'4 Rifonn's Lesi'station 1nd the ;ilt*.at"d" underll-- i4'"*a Ad' utas or*ideied bg tle Supreme Court. In tlut *o- itn appetlont u)a,s a tenant ctaiming righls under .tah*ttuml'I-and's Act' 1948' His application )?ombay Tenoncv ";; t tnder *ctio n 32 -G of itte-i,.id ea befary tle Tenancy Tribunar p ray ing to to ti'" land' orttners f9r tn1 purchose of determine tne prte"ti ;;;i ftal the tenant utas olready Ac.8-26 guntas *n;-i1"1[i:on tle .qrcuna t* y or$tr-of th9 Tenancs Tribunat twtding tand in.*";;;f'dW ih*"i AAh &urt' Before the Supreme Court' tu(rs reuersed ug il there w.,s a ctaim,,*Oatqiittn'^ir-, *n oftne tenant to an ertent of ddh 9f try Enantls-bytY: in whose fauour Ac.7-34 wnto,s *;;i uhich the, brotler was qiven the there wo.s an ald'p*ti6""-ir*r s;am.e land. RetianJ;; i"*d on.the statement mo'de by the land ,,)n", i.\ir. the renanLv i'lh't-t osltett as tte doanm'entary evklence owptd tte oral evidence of it support o7 partiii-tii wry&utt rtibtt-n,,tas eonclusive and held tlwt if the land owfler b"f"*fi*i;rrr"g the tand which ratlti;t* ;i"* ilttn brother of ttrc tenant is exctucted. tte latter would. Ue-itnin t7o dtiW orea entiiled to purchase the lartd f,om the tand. ounei';-d"lr,*d' iwraitwla' tl:e judgment of ttrc tltgtt ()ourt was antrrnei fhe fads fufory the Sltpreme Coun in ttrctt <:ase ig,the lond outner before the Tertancg clisclose ttnt tle "iu"ii^o* .tribunal should b" g; A* ueigli uhile detennining tte riual nqtis of t'\e owner andthetcnfit . 25. Apptying the principle in Dtganbu Adhor use (supra) it be qlrn<tst held ttat the Lantd ;i;frr"rs irthr;r.t utlile detcrmining the holdtng ctf late ttari Kistton Prt"d;Uedonttefae'tmof ane{ent o[ A1s' 150-96 lteuq i,, pltt"."i, n o7 ti p4Aea k;,,,,"ts at'a to ilut ertent gaue beru'fit to tirc d.eclarant. e aeititant uito matces a statement and gets benetfit ortt <tf such statement iniadng exetdd thar lattd fum his holdirtg tuoukl rr<tt i a sr stage;-in this co'se at tlrc st<u1e of be permittea to uil iiha ;r:r;; ,i ownership- nAn*t" A tti nrotiAed tenant to resil<t fr<'rtt ttre' statetnent ma.de u"iii ti Land Reforms Tribunol. rhe sarrre r|otrlrl a m<ru t7t to fraud on ptplic ofuninistration' 27 ttauing giuen a statement beforc tle Land Refomrs Tnburrul tlrrtt r{'lr() (r'.t' obout l5O acres of land is in poslession of protected under seciion 3g-E of trte 'r\'rrcttr< t1 .'\<'t. e;titred to o*n rslnip iirr*rA paitioners @nnot turn arourtcl ls<:fort tt'. tle petitioner,, f"tf"iii'ti T.-n..nc' fA,uni'-ai obieri_isate of outnership cert.{ic(il1's t<t ttr<' p,.otected tenants. 6wao&g n"i_u*i ki"t*n Prasad pkryed tl<'<'t'rt ort lt,btic auttarities P";;;i;rrl*"ry?y'*t) and he cannot 11s t11'11td I() s(IIl a,' <t later point of time thd the tenat:tti are not entitled lo (tttrrtt'rslttlr ct: rI ifi<:ates under the Tenatug Ad' 2,9. Ttrc learned Cowtsel for tle petitioners made his argttntent-s orr 'l()' I - 2,)01 ,nd. t3-2_2;;i:7h; unnia senior c;owtsel on i^structiolrs lrr(r(r€? cr srrlrmission thrlt t; iqed prot*ted ternnts filed stalernents b<tJon' tle no_t p rot ect e d t e r t ct r r I s t t n < l Te nrrnc! raounal*tJ;-;n*-:ry .tleg are tt,.at late uan Kisjhin-iri"anq stulr,hent before the spectal 'fats.dct<tr '|;;:i,' ji:; j*mil,:W,X:;*y,"'T'i".;!;;;i:l";,,',!;ii!';;;! -te.narlls' - 136 CVBR.J cxP tto.s2zgPo16 & Barch petitioners to Jile additiorwl alfidauit muchin aduane so that the tearned counsel for tle respondents mn fite their aunters to ttto* attqatiorts. Todag, wlrcn the use ammened to qtablb srt p.t[.@pat Rao, rearned coursel for the respondents, to sttm up his szrbmrssrbrr, tle petttioner's counsel plared apies of the alleged ffidauit and. aileged stdements along with an alfidauit across the fur. Hauhg regard to the tegal subrnissions made and detennined. bg this &urt- as utell as the fact that at the stage of reuision the petitioners hbve dtosen ta ame forutard. to present these documents, this &urt refitsd. prmission to tle petitioners' counsel to file the affidavit. Likewisg thau.gh Mr. p;M. Gopat Cao submits that the petitioners illegaua.sold awag oll tle AcSsO.@ of lanfl uhich wa.s oiginallg oured bg late Raj Naragana prosg{ for fiu same reasons, this court refused permisston to tle partis to brhq all these cira.tm.stances o n record- " d) From the above decisions, it is clear that section 3g-D of the Tenancy Act imposes a statutory embargo on the landholder from alienating tenanted land to anyone other than the protected tenant. The right of first purchase is vested exclusively in the protected tenant, and any alienation contrar5r to this mandate .is void and unenforceable in law. Consequently, any interest created in favour of third parties prior to the exercise of the protected tenants' statutory rights under section 38-D cannot override or extinguish such tenancy rights. In the instant cases, the sale-deeds executed by M/s.Kastopa corporation in favour of the rlsnoqdents during rhe pendency of tenancy proceedings and, prior to the conclusion of ownership rights under Secrion 38-E/38-A *T in violation of Section 38-D. The purchasers thus l,acked thc legal stand to asser.t any claim or title over the lands so conveyed, since such transfers were contrary to the statutory protection afforded to the tenants. The tenancy rights, even after the demise of the protected tenant, devolve upon their legal heirs and remain operative until extinguished in n 137 CVBR.J CRP No. 5279 fzo I 6 &. Batch accordance with law. Mere physical occupation or title claims by third parties, either prior to or post such grant, are not legally sustainable unless the surrender of tenancy rights has been validly effected under Section 19 of the Act. Furthermore, any third-party rights created pending final adjudication of tenancy claims cannot defeat the clainr of a protected tenant unless there is a clear case of consent, waiver, or estoppel. The law is settled that protected tenants' rights are not clefeated by delay alone, and the mere passage of time does not extinguish them. Where landholders have consciously excluded certain lemds frorn ceiling declarations, they are estopped from later denying the rights of protected tenants. The issuance of certificates under Se:ction .38-E/3S-A may validly follow even without fresh enquiry if the claim of protected tenancy was earlier admitted or acknowlerlged, including for the purpose o[ exclusion under land ceiling lanvs. These legal propositions reinforce the conclusion that any sale or creation of interest in favour o[ respondents during pendency of tenancy adjudication proceedings and before the issuance of certilicates under Section 38-E, is not binding on the protected tenants or their Successors. Therefore, such sale deeds have no overriding effect on the tenancy rights of the petitioners, which stoo,C protected under law. 138 . CVBR,J CRP No.5279mrc & Batch I 4I. This Court has carefully considered the material placed on record, the submissions of the learned counsel for both sides; and the legal framework governing the rights of protected tenants under the Tenancy Act. The undisputed facts reveal that the petitioners were claiming rights under Section 38-E/38-A of the Tenancy Act over an extent of Acs.36.25 gts in Survey Nos.51, 52, and 53 (part) situated at Gachibowli Village. These lands have consistently been recorded as agricultural in nature, and the protected tenanry rights claimed over them stood crystallized long before Government Orders were issued under the Urban Areas (Development) Act, L975, seeking to alter the land use or reclassify the region. In W.P.No.459O of 198O, this Court categorically recognized the existence of protected tenants and directed a fact-linding exercise through the District Collector or an officer not below the rank of Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO)/Deputy Collector. Pursuant to the said direction, the RDO submitted a report dated 27.O7.1981 confirming the tenanry claims. The authenticity of the report was not disputed before the Division Bench and the same has attained l-rnality and it cannot be discarded, particularly when it was never challenged by the declarant Mls. Kastopa Corporation, or the subsequent purchasers. The RDO, in his subsequent order dated

15.1O.2O13, thoroughly examined the certified extracts of Tenancy Register and report dated 27.07-1981 and concluded that thc petitioners were entitled to be treated as protected tenants eligible for . - .A _." r'") 139 cvB&J CRP No.5279 [2O I 6 & Batch grant.o:l certificates under Section 38-E/38-A. However, the Joint Collector, vide impugned order dated 24.O9.2016, reversed the RDO's conclusions.

42. Besides the above, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners strenuortsly contended that impugned order of the Joint Collector is biased rrhd mala fide stating that the matters were heard and reserved'on L7.O9.2O16 and there was no date on which the impugned order was pronounced and the same was interpolated into note filesr. Admittedly as on the date of passing of impugned order i.e; on 24.O9'.2}I6.(alleged to have been passed in the Open Court), the Joint Cclllector was. on leave for 13 days for the period from

24.09.20}6 to 06.10.2016 (both days inclusive) vide G.O.RI.No.2O79 dated 20.09.2016 and the certilied copy of the order was dispatched on 18.10.2016. Whereas the respondents conl-cnded that Mr. Rajat Kumar Saini, [AS, Joint Collector-I, Ranga Rcddy District, handed over the c:harge of his post to Ms. Amrapali Kata, IAS, Joint Collector- II, Ranga Reddy District on 26.09.2016 AN vide Lr.No.A Ll3992l2OL5 dated 26.Og.2iO16 and therefore, the impugncd order passed by the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District does not suffer from the legal inlirmities.

43. This Court has carefully considered thc entire record of the Joint Coltector-I /Appellate Authori ty. No cause list is placed on nr\ 140 CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch r\ record to show that the impugned order was pronounced in the open court on 24.o9.2oL6. The relevant dates of proceedings from the note File No.F2 /540812013 on the lile of Joint collector-l, Ranga Reddy District, are reproduced hereunder: .:.-..'-:::,i,'.': -''' -ll- xrf,> ,-ll. t8.o6'aoog ' As Urc, feUi6*ra Q6[sr6r^hr trcfcg< h.c-. ccrr*s tt^4. qa*tFl, it g4ier^fnaa a.ruf pe*car -t?, t6^c'1.a.o(t- .d. ?.oc, pr1. \s-sc--L ftbo.1r&ot.6. -r--.. aa.&&!g rT.q )otG ?or6.4a,ag ,. ,rvaftra...'&fib- Adrroc,ofi^ bo^rccte ltlc. Oqe.a tF,o- F6it-A € &-(off-at;t64b g-oo,p11. \. -sc )(' . cb.tld/ @l.rtgrf,l &l +irf*.:rto,r1 6rJ &..-.rcf 'fkt- Bexn* {Jo. q*to-aenl cs5"<.Al lf.a. . €Eir.n3el . )( - . ( ?-le rtt --" i...lt;\ i-,i-'7[_:" o 141 CVB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch 44- From the above note file, it is evident that the impugned order was pasised at the time when the Joint Collector was oflicially on leave, which raises serious doubt regarding the manner of disposal and the procedural propriety of the order-making process.

45. The Division Bench while disposing of CRP No.6708 of 2OO3 and batc:h specifically directed the RDO to examine the claims of tenancy rights over the lands in Sy.Nos.Sl, 52, and S3(Part) to an extent of Ac.36.25 gts and the said order has been confirmed by the Hon'lcle llpex Court vide Civil Appeal No.3054 of 2006 and batch. Thus, the jurisdiction of tJ:e RDO was confined strictly to an extent of ,.ri:' j,-j::' Ac.36.25 gts in compliance with the orders of the Division Bench. However, the record discloses that instead of conlining his examinatirn to the said extent, the RDO held that the tenants were entitled to Ac.42.24 g[s. Once the orders of the Division Bench stood conlirmed, thereby limiting the jurisdiction of the RDO to Ac.36.25 gts, the RDO had no authority to grant tenancy rights beyond that extent. Thr: Joint Collector, sitting in appeal, also failed to examine this vital issue. This Court, while exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 92 of the Tenancy Act, is empowered to pass orders consistent with the Act, whether by way of confirmation, rescission, or modification of the order under appeal or revision, as appears to be just and by virtue of the powers vested under sub-section (2) of A 1,42 cva&J CRP No.5279n0rc &3arch a) Section 89, this Ceurt is competent to modify the order of the RDO dated 15.1O.2O13.

46. In ttre absence of cogent or unimpeachable evidence to the contrar5r, and in the light of admitted failure to comply with the procqdure under Section 19 of the Tenancy Act concerning surrender of tenancy rights, this Court finds that the certilied entries in the Tenancy Register; coupled with the RDO's report dated 27.02.1981, are conclusive of the fact that the revision petitioners continued to be in possession as protected tenants. The record further indicates that these lands remained classified as agricultural lands as per the entries maintained under the Telangana Land Revenue Act, L}LZ Fasli. The provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Record of Rights in Land Regulation, 1358 Fasli, made applicablc across the State vide Government Notifications dated 07.1O. 1953 and 24.08.1955, mandated the preparation and finalization of Rccord of Rights for each village. Notification No.53 dated 24.O8.1955 spccilically included all lands covered by the Tenancy Acr, I95O. As per Rule 3 of the Rules, tJre entries in Columns L to 19 of the Pahani Pafrika are Record of Rights. These statutory records establish the tenancy rights of the revision petitioners. The contention that tenancy rights were the year 1960, specificaily under File surrendered in Nos-A3/10805/6,4, A313749/6s, and A4/2ss6/66, is unfounded, as r 143 cvB&J CRP No.527912016 & Batch those pr')ceedings relate only to the lands held by Lingamma. By the year 195,8, Lingamma had already divested her rights by executing registererl sale deeds in favour of llyas Burni, and any surrender made thereafter has no relevance.

47. Further, Mr. Sharath Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the responderrt No.47 in W.P.No.3860 of 2OO8 has produced the copy of ULC Proc,:edings dated 08.11.L996 passed in File No.Fl12645/76 by the Special Oflicer and Competent Aut]rority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabarl, and the same is reproduced below: (Contd...) 144 cvBR"J CRP No.5279l20l6 & Barch rsooceititgi 'of 'tlre;, Sp.eol+.l. otf!.osr it, coatroter?iuthorlty ' ,.,.1 ,.., 1 . ;ltltba4 ;I,ond Ce{I!.u5o, tfil)?prAAD r. ,liEr YI.III EU&A3.. : IltS. i ;- r.'. j. Rt /?,645 n:6' : '.'Sribr- AoaCr: t) 9t. S-l t-96 r'.ot, 1 t?6 -tt U.t- 'f.1loi b5r. a rtct .Ftrrt Rep. - 8ov.1s ed of tb Io:lo-f lIo; Irt .t 5.9. {gg.e o x:, c.Bii, .Toir 'ft.11 ng of .3tdt'ereent .u.ador oeotl.on 6 (1 ) .ot tt o i.i .l'.. )i.!(oaderr or bobat.f ott4/a..Eootopba Oor- r.ct by'.it$i Srtrit portrtlon; [trtnl$aC anA bas€d.. oir'tha terlf1 ontlca rop+rt asd !.eogrd, 'Crelt EPtqr.l,sl aiq8lrsbLo on uctlco 'ur{ct- asbttoa 8()) of thQ acr. ba3 beon loouorl vldo '1, - ; t 'flt&. Fqceedja6s. i;t 'reeit .abover dec).ar1:'.9 th o .Cecla:ran .1. I' aulp luo',Itkrdiilt0l,.dar .,tb r:a'e=tont <tf .7 t69,458.6J. oq ,:tt4o, 'atatoneo t u/ a A(t ). ond' ' .:. .,I .. '-.. : -' :.o.ltuated ot'ooohlbovli. v1I1c6o. th . fl Ie of <;bJocti'o:ilr,1f. nlu- to tlre j,: ()O)friya fi.orq tbc deto of lto reoolpt. llrgJt ata.'to.ooni "ri!l 6 cosln-ront'hiu ,qetti$ga.e1i !/eo2.J?, =olol-r'c corts!.n obJootl -nE .in o:'dtr tc ittford' s:] opPortunlty' gF€f.!.. -to ttrls obee Lue !e6u tskon up for bctrrtd6 of hoerl+g, flDa] u:tsr.u unA€r root':i& utth 'flnaL riotloo und,or ao<itloa 8. !..ei.uod'vtcio giooooO!.tgc 4tb road' ibots r,o cur?Iug la'nc troidor to.an extorr ., .,1n syro c.?2o, i7 , 52 ,' 55 ot G(tohlbor{]. 1 '.,i r:. .. +"\ "\ \ I f') 145 CVBR,J CRP No. 5279 l2O I 6 & Batch freb:eaved by bAse=s .hlr'Ir.e-.

95. i,o .tbe '' .,!l ..1<iwcr tho :i .: .cor!f o==sc tJ6ocurab1o Et-6. ol'tbc ol-ear' 'ibat d,eoLarrrnt .P1ra o?d tbore rarldo tbc Laot (4Q) yoasc .for ?anenoS' =I-ght = t/t ?onansl' an d. . t 6r.i- cu it tgo'- ln':rdg' lt <it )?-A of :.'of o:-=c,C to aJ'the =ooordcd or tbo '3.4. '8eg.let-or. g=a,nt e<t Te:rctla;: on tb o n$noAof ,ti1? p.rot oot <rt t do ceao c'J &r6oI gv or tho On'{ <1 "Inndg. ,l Qa vor5lqLtl.dn'of ;l rrld ont .tqc-t 7t .tl.l'o tb6 .puf l'gr1o i-r. 8.2.1995. !10 ! .t j j:i te?o ( hensj.r, 'a 3t or .L lor')" d+'d, ttr*il'zr *;+oo wo=9 ti.. ?.1..: ) .: 8u'cries's6'rrr}i rroo of, tho eos lon s Lun<t o 'f.,u rJ.r . . ' ''-;. i r.i +.r:l'i.ir.: r. .. . 146 CVB&J CRP No.5279l20 I 6 & Batch (cot l:ac i: rieguratto:i)eot, 1 gl 6. TO I )tt:! c. i{sbLreGhu'lgo, Advocete : *; i& o: ztltl,''-&i'r,. a 1. .'E!!.tophg' -. '. ; .'.. ." ' c"r"rty, aoac rb. f 2''. " 2 ) . X./ o. Oorpor'"11. on, = ap. by' PortaQ:t' 3.=1. ltastklaf L.Ifa,reaor ., !O,IO'*8:56 sD.at 57 !,lacrral:1' rYDERIILtD. 3) copyto: Sgpdt'at sec. 4) oopytot Stook f!J.o. l/k ( SPe.c.lal Urban ti: -.".:?'l:'r 2 1 0C1'ang, (TRAN A. 6€.. r.A. LLs. ; ADVC)CATE | \-i.? ,A ,al. !:or OrGd N.P' . o t47 CVBR,J CRP No.5279DOl6 &Batch

48. Sri C-Hanumantha Rao, learned counsel who had earlier represented Kastopa Corporation in the proceedings before the ULC Authorit'y, is now appearing for the respondents/plot owners in these revisions. The stand he presentl5r took in ,6e-s€ cases is inconsistent with the stand taken by him before the Urc Authority. He now disputes the very existence of tenants over the subject lands, despite the entri,:s recorded in the tenanry register prepared. under Section g7-A of t:re Tenancy Act. Having *g"rd to the submissions made by the declar-ant as well as the learned counsel, it ca+ be safely held that any allegr:d compromise or alienation of the lands prior to the vesting date, particularly if done in violation of Section 33 of the Tenancy Act, is invalid. Likewise, any sale deeds ocec"ufed without following the procedure prescribed under Section 38;E or Section 19 o[ the Tenancy Act are uoid ab initio.

49. Section 37A of Tenancy Act was inserted vide Amendment Act No.lll of L1)56, dated 12.03.1956 conferring the rights on the tenants. As such, any compromise or any alienation prior to the vesting datc are deemerl to be in violation of Section 33 of the Act and the same are void.

50. The subsequent G.O;Ms.No.183 dated 24.O3.2OOO issued under thc IJrban Areas (Development) Act, Lg75, notifying the lands as falling under 'residential use" ?Dtre, has no effect on the protected 148 cvBR J CRPNo.5279n0rc & Batch t; tenancy rights which had already vested. Section 1O4 of the Tenancy Act has overriding effect over all other enactments. Unless there is a notification under section 102(e) of the Tenanry Act, which is absent in this case, the applicability of 'the'Tenanry Act continues. The doctrine of lis pend"ens mandates that rights must be adjudicated under the legal regime prevailing as on the date of commencement of litigation, and subsequent enactments cannot defeat vested rights. Furthermore, as held in Mir Sardor All a. Mqndal Reuenue Ofjicer, r(escra's case (supra), mere inclusion of agricultural lands within municipal limits or reclassif-rcation under other enactments cannot extinguish the tenancy rights unless specilic stahrtory. notifications are issued under the Tenancy Act. similarly, in the case of Kotalah v. Propertg Assn. of the Bapdrt Cfuirches (supr{, the Hon'ble Supreme Court reiterated that a protected tenant acquires ownership upon issuance of notification under Section 38-E and cannot be dispossessed illegally. It is settled law that when a person is disputing the status of another person as that of the protected tenant or deemed protected tenant, the former'is required to Ele necessary application in that regard and invite an order of the authority on the dispute rega-rding the status of tenancy in favour of another person. ' Admittedly, in the sale deeds said to have been executed in favour of respondents by the vendors (Kastopa Corporation and the tenants), it was stated that there are protected tent lts. Further, the vendor i.e, n t49 CVB&J CRP No.5279 f2O I 6 & Batch Kastopzr Corporation also in written arguments admitted that there are protected tenancy rights and the nature of land is agricultural land and prayed to allow the revision petitions filed by the tenants (As per tle Counter alfid,aait fited bA M/s.Kastopa Corporation uiz., Resporrclent No.39 in CRP No.5279/2OIq. The alleged sale deeds executecl in favour of the respondents were denied by the petitioners stating that same are fraudulent documents. [n the circumstances in absence of any order of the competent authorit5r regarding denying the right of protected tenant in relation to the subject lands by filing appropri:r.te application, no fault can be found in declaring the petitione::s as entitled for certificates under Section 38E/38-A.

51. Tht: claim that the purchasers under various sale deeds acquired valid title is equally untenable. The sale deeds executed by individuals such as Gadda Balaiah as alleged GPA holder were not supportecl by succession certificates issued by the competent authorities under the provisiorrs of the Tenancy Act and the same I were execrrted during the pendency of tenancy litigation, and are thus hit by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. No proof of conversion under the NALA Act or permission from the District Collector under Telangana land Revenue l\ct, L3l7 Fasli is placed on record. Mere payment of development charges or submission of layout plans to municipal 150 CVB&J " -CRP-No.5n9nO rc & Batch ,i authorities does not amount to conversion of the land use or extinguish tenancy rights.

52. In view of the above discusSion, this Court is of the view that the impugned common order dated 24.Q9.24L6 passed in Case No.F2l5a08/2013 and batch by the Joint Collector/Appellate Authority, is unsustainable in law and ttre same is liable to be set aside. Consequently, the order dated 15.1O.2O13 passed in Proceedings No.G/269O12O13 by the RDO is required to be modified.

53. Accordingly, Civil Revision Petitlon lfos.5279, 5570, 5631, s6g2,5633, 5634, 5635, 5665, 5666, :o(ri71 566g, 56g0, 56g1, 5683, 5696, 5731, 5732,5959, 6164, $.,,11,6,4791 6503, 55O4 of 2OL6; 6, zLO, 2L9, 377 , 998, 999, 1O7O, 1O71-r. 1188, 1588, L882, 1938, 1951, 2C,46, 2437 and 316O of 2OLA ate allowed. The impugnccl cornnron order dated 24.O9.2OL6. passed in Case No.F2l54O5/2O13 and batch by tt:e Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District is set aside. The order dated ,15:10.2013 Proceedirrgs No.G/2690/20lg by thq Rqyenue .Divisional Otficer, Chevella, is modificd conlining the tenancy rights under Section passed in : 38E/38A o[ l'enancy Act, to an extent of Ac;36.25 gts in Sy.Nos.S1, 52 and 53(part) of Gachibowli Village and the tenants mentioned in . .:-j the provisional list prepared under Section a(1) of the Tenancy Act (as stated in the affidauit dated 14.02.1988 ftled by the Di.stict Collector. I5I CVBR,J CRP No.5279 l2O I 6 & Batch Rantga trleddg Districf in W.A.No.1428 of 1987 - @py of the same annet@d as material papers to the paper bookfiled in C.R.P.No.1588 of 2O1n and.their legal heirs/successors-in-interest are entitled for ownership rights. The observations made in these revisions will not come in rlee way of the rights of the parties in respect of the lands in Sy.Nos.3l5, 36, 37,40,42,43,44,45, 46,47 and 53(part) of Gachiboudi village, Serilingampalty Mandal.

54. trI.tD.tr[o.1.1157. of 2o19: The case of the petitioner is that he has pun:hased land admeasuring Ac.l.2ogts in Sy.No.53 of Gachibowli village vide documenr No.2888/2oo3 dated ro.o3.2oo3 from the tenant, who obtained sale cerrificate dated 28.04.2001 in Ref.No.G/ g640/96 under section 38A of Tenancy Act. It is stated that aggri,-.ved by the common order dated O7.LO.2OO5 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in cRP Nos.67o8 and t2oo of 2oo3, the appeals virle Civil Appeal. No.3o5a/ 2006 and barch was liled on the Honble Strpreme Court and the Honble Supreme court vide order dated 07.L2.2o10 allowed the appeals and remanded the matter back to the Division Bench of this Court. The case of the petitioner is that even beforr: the matter is being remanded, he purchased the said propert5r under valid document and therefore, his right and title is intact in v.iew of issuance of sale certit-rcate under Section 38A of Tenancy A<:t and his case is squarely covered by the decision of Ii J.* 152 CRF CVB&J I ( .P' Iro+^k C." Hon'ble Apex Court in Tanu Ram Botu. as. Promod. CtL Dastss and prayed for allowing the wit petition in terms of cRp No.5279 of 2016 and batch

55. This court linds that the RDo, as the competent authority under the Tenancy Act, rightly passed the order dated 15.10.2013 concluding that the petitioners are entitled to certificates under sections 38-E/38-A and that no valid surrender had taken place under Section 19 of the Tenancy Act. However, the Joint Collector/ Appellate Authority, erred in setting aside the RDo's order. In view of the above, the impugned order of the Joint Collector is unsustainable in law. Accordi-gry, writ petition No.lllsz of 2o]rg is allowed in terms of the orders passed in cRP No.5279 of 2o16 and batch. 56- w.P.No.6759 of 2o17: This writ Petition is filed by one of the tenants seeking to declare the inaction on the part of GHMC officials in removing the illegal structures made by the unofficial respondents inspite of issuance of notice No.27o2lTPS/c l L/wzlGHMcl2otT as illegal.

57. Since the petitioner tias remedies available under the Tenancy Act for securing possession, including the dwelling units, he is at liberty to pursue such remedies in accordance with law. The GHMC is directed not to entertain any applications seeking permissions over "t (20 r9) 4 scc l7-l f, t53 CVBR"J CRP No.5279l2016 & Batch the subj,:ct lands in Sy.Nos.sl, 52 and 53 of Gachibowli Village and unauthorised constructions, if any found, shall be removed by following due process of law and in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the Hon'lcle Apex Court in Re: Directions in thc matter of dettalitTon of stntcturesr3s and RaJendra Kumar Bantatyor and. a;nother as. A.P. Avq.s Evo;tn Vikors Parlsho.d. a nd otlrersl4t. With the above obsenrations, Writ Petition No.6759 of 2OL7 is disposed of.

58. !['p.Uo.S86O of 2OO8: This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the exgmption orders issued by the State Government vide G.O.Ms.No,1816. dated 18.1O.2OO5 and G.O.Ms.No.2L83 dated

27.12:2OCr5 aq well as the building ptan approvals granted by the Vice r- Chairman, HUDA (CDA), Hyderabad vide Lr.No. 13092/BPlCDA|2OO6 dated 15.05.2007, and the mutti-storied complex plan sanctioned by the Deputlr Municipal Commissioner, Serilingampally, GHMC vide proceediq3s No.G/353/BP /2611 /2OO7 dated 19.05.2007, as illegal and to set aside same stating that respondent Nos.12 to 33 have no right to alienate any portion of the land in Survey Nos. 35, 36, 37, 40, 42,43,-44,45,46,47 and 53 (part) of Gachibowli Village; to direct the respondents 10 and 1l to stop constructions on the disputed land; to declare the General Power of Attorney executed by "'2024 SCC OnLine SC 3291 'no Civil Appeal No. 14604 of 2024 dated I 7. I l.l0lJ 154 cRPNo.52i4pu6+Batch c cvB&J 13 to 31 in favour of P. Venugopal Reddy as fraudulent, along with sale deeds bearing Doc.Nos.288Z/2003 to 2gOOl2OO3 dated 1O.03.20O3, Doc.Nos.4646/2OOL, 4647 l2OOt & 4648/200r dated, 27 ;06.2O0 1, Doc.No.675 l 2OOS dated 29.08.2O03, Agreement of Sale-cum-GPA Doc.Nos.45 13 / 20O6 dated. 22.06.200 t, LOS36 I 20Cl6 dated 08.O5.2O05, Development-cum-GPA Doc.Nos.8355/2006 dated

10.04.2006 and arc6/2O06 dated 20.O2.2006; and to declare all subsequent sale transactions in Sunrey No.46 of Gachibowli Village as null and void.

59. Pending of the claims in this writ petition, the dispute arising over the subject lands were remanded to this Court by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.3054 of 2006 and batch uide order dated O7-12.2O10 and on remand, the Division Bench of this Court while disposing of CRP No.67O8 of 2003 and batch vide common order dated 25.02.2013, observed in Para 6l as follows: "61. On the annlysis abtn, tae lpld on issue No-S fmmed bg the Suprenl@ C.aurt tl@, land.s auerd bg prot*aed. tenancg rQhts (ttaugh liable to be dtdd trom the lolding ol Kastopa under the Ceiling Act first tn uieut o/ S. 13, btt uEre not so excluded in 1975) cannot be excludd subsquentlg bg autharities under the Ceiling Act" at the h1.sta nce of proteded. tenants or the landholder- We hold on isstl,e No. 7 thaf iutphts land. to an ?ctant of Ac 137.17 gts in Sy. /Vos. 35 to 37, 40, 42 to 47 and 53 of Gachibowli uilloge had. irrewcably uested in tle S'tate und.er &dion 11 of the Ceiling Act and. any transaction by uag of sale or otleruti!:e in respdt of the s,:id land bg tte alleged protected tenarlts and the pattedors is rcid ab inttio, of no legal ejfect or consequene and iroperatiue. We olso hold. on issue No.8 that Ceiling proeed qs had ortained finalitg tuith the dismissal o/ C-R.P.S.R. No. 24698 of 1976 on 28-04-1976 and the same couw not be reapened in or qua urit proeedings or in callateral proeedings." l5s CVBR,J CRP No.5279r2016 & Batch t t The aforeszrid order of the Division Bench of this Court was assailed before the Honble Apex Court vide SLP (Civil) Nos.l7386-17388 of 2OL3 and SiLP (C) No.2a254l2OL6. The SLP (Civil) Nos.17386-17388 of 2O13 was dismissed vide order dated 07.LO.2O13, wherein it was observed as follows: 'Heard. Permisston to ftle the special leaue petitiors is granted. We se no ree.som to interfere with tle order impugned.. The special leaue peffiiotts are omrdinglg dismissed. We, houeue4 molce it dear thal if angone out of the parties is aggrieued of tlefiaol order whichtle RDO mag pa.ss, pursuant to tlte remand or.der passd.'.ltg tW,#Uh Court, he/slle will be free to seek such redress as moy be c,tlerlfiirse auailable ogainst any suchorder in law."

60. Whereras, S.L.P(C) No.242541201,6 was dismissed as withdrawn on 16.12.2016. tn view of the same, the cause o[ action in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication as the present cases are confined to ,Ceal with lands admeasuring Ac.36.25 gts in Sy.Nos.S1, 52 and s3(part) of Gachibowli Village alone. Sofaras the other relief regarding cancellation of General Power of Attorney and to declare all subsequent sale transactions in Sy.No.46 of Gachibowli Village as nu[[ and void is concerned, no relief can be granted by this Court while exercisring the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accorrlingly, Writ Petition No.386O of 2OO8 is dismissed. \ \ rs6 CVBR,J

61. In the result, civil Revision petition Nos.5279, ss70, s6gr, 5632,5633, 5634, 5635, 5665, 5666, 5667,5668, 56g0, 56g1, 56g3, 5686, 5701, STg2,5g5g, 6164,6461,6429,6503, 650z+ of 2OL6;6, 27O,21g,377, ggg, ggg, lo7o, LO7l,l l'g, 15gg, rgg2,lg3g, 1951, 2046, 24gr and 316o of 2o!z are alrowed; w.p.No. rllsz of 2ol9 is allowed; w.p.No.6TS9 of 2orz is disposed of and w.p.No.3g6o of 2008 is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in these cases shall stand closed. No order as to costs. *@u!- m+ sD/-HUSsffi ASSISTANT RreISTRAR. : ''-.: ': " ./ I //TRUE COPY/I SECTION OFFICER, To, {o- {o

1. The Joint Collector-!, Ranga Reddy District 2. ?' SRI Q JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, Advocate loPUCl oPUCI IoPUCI , Advocate IOPUCI RAO, Advocate IOPUC} RAJ VERMA, Advocate loPUCl Y'ASHOK RAJ, Advocate IoPUCI PRATEEK REDDY, Advocate loPUCl AND S LAW ASSOCIAT ES, Advccate [OPUC] 'VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OPUC] 4 5 6. One 7. I I 1C.One 11.One CC 12. One CC to 13.One OCto SRI AVANCHA H CHAKRAVARTHY, Advocate [OPUC] 14. One CC to SRI HARENDER PRASAD , Advocate IOPLTC] 15.One 16.One 17. One CC to SRt 18. One CC to SRI RAMAKRTSHNA. pATtVA DA, Advocate IOPUCI 19.One CC to M/S. RAJA GOPALLAVAI'J TAYl, Advocate IOPUC] 20.One CC to SRI V VEMMADHAV Advocate [OPUC] 2 i . one CC to SRI E MADAN MOHAN RAO, Advocate IOPUCI 22.One CC to SRt CH STDDART'HA SARMA, Advocare IOPUC] 23. One CC to SRI K SR|N|VASA pRASAD, A.dvocate IOPUC] 24.One CC to SRI K DEVEf{DER, Advocare [oPUCi M V HANUMANTHA RAO, Advocate IoPUCI , P S4l RAM, Advocate iOPUCI CHITNENI MOHAN RAO, Advocate loPUCl

25.One CC; to SRI SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI, AdvocatE [OPUC] 26.One CC: to SRI C HANUMANTHA RAO,.Advocate tOPt Cl 27.Ooe CC; to SRI SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI, Advocate [OPUC] 28.One CC;to SRI J PRABHAKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 29.One CC:to SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC FOR GHMC, IOPUC] 30.One CC;to SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI, Advocate TOPUCI 31.ONC CC: tO SRI A P REDDY, AdVOCAtC [OPUCI 32.One CC;to SRI KEERTHI KIRAN KOTA, Advocate [OPUCI 33.Two CC;s to the GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEV,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

34.Two CCs to the GP FOR HOME, High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

35.Two CCs to the GP FOR APPEALS, High Court for the State of Telangana at / Hyderatrad (OUT)

36. Two CD Copies fu\q, \ \ 2tl gt\ c5 o rJ z 0) .b * 11 l\hs 20?$ * D E c HIGH COUIIT CVBR,J DATED:06l'lU2O25 COMMON ORDER \ \ Civil Revision Petition Nos.5279, 5570, 563{, 5032, 5633, 5634, 5635, 5665, 5666, 5667, 5669, 5690, 5691, 5693, 5696, 5731, 5732,5959, 6164, 6461 ,6479,6503, 6504 of 2016; 6, 210, 219,377,999, ggg, 1070,1071, 1199, 1599, 1992,1939, 1951 ,2046,2437 and 3{6O of 2O17 Writ Petition Nos.3860 of 2008, 6759 of 2017 and l11s7 of 2019 Civil Revision Petition Nos.5279, 5570, 5631, 5632, 5633, 5634, 5635, 5665, 5666, 5667, 5669, 5690, 56gl , 56g3, 5696, 5731, 5732,5959, 6164, 6461 ,6479,6503, 6504 0f 2016; 6, 210,219,377,999, ggg, 1070,1071, 1199, 1599, 1992,193g, 1951, 2046,2437 :rnd 3160 of 2017 are allowed; W.P.No.11157 of 2019 is allowed; W.P.No.675!, of 2017 is disposed of and W.P.No.3860 of.2008 is dismissed. r lo\rl -t t t I I