The High Court · 2025

The Superdent of police suryapata District, At suryapata The Station House Officer (S.H.0), at Mattampally police station at Mattampally Sri.Babu, s/o not known petitioner age about 40 years, Occ. Sub-inspector of police at Mattampally police station at Mattampally V.lvlahesh Goud, s/o Viswanatham, age 50 years. occ Political r/o Mattampally village suryapata district.,. V. Ganesh, s/o Srinu age 30 years. occ. Political r/o Mattampally village suryapata district K.Naveen, s/o not known petitioner, age 55 years. occ Political r/o Mattampally village suryapata distict Sri.Ajith, s/o Nageswarao age 35 years occ. Private employee/o Mattampally village suryapata distict ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of i\Iandamus declaring the action the aciion of the respondents. no.3 and 4 in interfering with peaclful possession, enjoyment, day to day.busine^ss and life of the petitioner at the instigation of the respondents by calling in the ccTV footage that too without following due process of law and without jurisdiction into civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent no 5 to 8 and the 1st respondent take disciplinary take action against the respondent.no.4 for illegall Arbitrary, unjust and against the provisions of BNS and BNSS Act 2023 and also against article 1 4,1 6, 1 I ,21 and 300,4 of constitution of lndia lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may br: pleased to direct the respondent.no.3 and 4 not to interfere with peaceful possession, enjoyment, day to day business ;rnd life of the petitioner and family members at the instigation of respondent.no.5 to that too without following due process of law and into civil disputes pending between the petitioner and 40 respondent no 5 to B before the various forums forthwith pending disposal of the above write petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KARUNAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 8: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W t o N 1 64 t ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, and with the consent of the rearned counser appearing for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admlssion stage. 2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ petition at the admission stage and the nature of /b involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.4 to B is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ petition.

3. The case oi the petitioner, in brief, is that, respondent Nos.3 and 4 are interfering with the peaceful possession, enjoyment, day to day business and life of the petitioner at the instigation of the unofficial respondents herein by calllng him to the police station and interfering in civil dispute pending between the petitioner and unofficial respondents 5 to B herein, without following due process of law, which action of the respondents it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the provisions of BNS and BNSS, with a consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and the conduct of his business. 2

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, would submit that the 7t'' respondent in the present Writ Petition had approached the respondents-authorities and lodged a complaint against the petitioner on 03.07.2025; that on receiving the aforesaid complaint from the 7th respondent, the authorities have made a GD entry and after causing preliminary enquiry, have closed the aforesaid complaint as'civil in nature'on 08.07.2025.

5. Learned Government Pleader would also submit that the petitioner herein had approached the respondents-authorities and lodged a compraint on 04.07.2025; and that the respondents-authorities after making GD entry and causing preliminary enquiry thereinto, have also closed the aforesaid compraint as'civir in nature,on og.o7.2o2s and issued intimation of the action taken to the petitioner through petition Management System.

6. Learned Government pleader would thus submit that the respondents-a uthorities, except causing preliminary enquiry into the complaint lodged by the petitioner and against the petitioner, are not interfering in the civir dispute pending between the petitioner and unofficiat respondenrs herein, or interfering with the peacefurpo'se,S/,n or day to day business and life and fibedy of the peiltioner as a/eged, l 7' The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos,1 to 3 is taken on record. B. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and taking note of the fact that the complaint lodged by the petitioner and counter complaint lodged against the petitioner having resulted in closure as ,civil in nature' on 08.07.2025, this Court is of the view that the respondents_ authorities are to be directed not to interfere with the rife and riberty of the petitioner or in the civir dispute that may exist between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents herein, except in accordance with raw. 9. Subject to the above direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 10 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. / To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY S STANT REGISTRA ECTION OFFICER 1 . The Principal Secretary, Home Deportment Secretary, erabad.

5. The Superdent of police suryapata District, At suryapata The Station House Officer (S.H.0), at Mattampally police station at Mattampally one CC to SRl. KARUNAKAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana' [OUT] Two CD CoPies

6. KKS LS \'ttt ) HIGH COURT DATED:1410712025 ORDER WP.No.19964 of 2025 t' -" l; .l li ,.; \ L1 U;1 4 * r)!ii ...Y1"l( -,:t-' ," a, ,\ :ai ,n tl i/ D'SPOS'NG THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @r^o. >z(rolz-{