The High Court · 2025

2. Nvlam Mahender, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 34 years, Occ Agriculture' -Ryo ' iftH;|il v,ii"di, B"Xi;iiMihorj, Siddipet Disirict (Award No 6/1e81-82 dt 3. Burra Srihari, S/o Narayana, Aged about .48- years, Occ Agriculture' . " C;i;il Mrif<anoo, Viffig",-'Cf,igrrumamidi Niandal, Karimangar District. 30is/1981 ) Fyo (Award No.2/1978-79 dt 23-3-1979)

4.BurraSrinivas,S/oKanakaiah,Agedabout32.years'Occ'Agriculture'-Rl/o Hno. ro-i7l'l , bripuram doni: Bdmmakal, Karirinaga(Award No B/81-82 dt 30/6/81) 5. Burra Satyanarayna, S/o Hanmuiah, M/o Mallawa Aoed about 44 Yeats' Occ. Aoricutture, Fyo M-ant6nOri Viflugu and Manball Karimnagar District (Award -No.8/1983-84 dt 29l8l84) 28tBl84)

6. Burra Prem Kumar, Sio Rajaiah, Aged about-31 years' Occ Unemloyee' Fl/o " il;;I,;"dr;viiiJge'ano ryriitaii,'rr-,-n'sar Distiict (Award No 8/1e83-84 dt 7. Katti Thirupathi, S/o Venkati, Aged about 45 years' Occ' AgrlqYl-tyr-e'^F/9 ' ivr?rr,.j"ii,ilViiils" ino tviino'ai,-kiri*nasar Disirict (Award No.8/1981-82 dt 8. Katti Thirupathi, S/o Shankaraia.h, Aged about 40.years' Occ' Aglic.t'!t^ure..f/o " ivr?"r.i,iirlViiiise ,nO-r\,iJnOit,'t<riirnagar Distiict(Award No.B/1981-82 dt 9. Vadiakonda Sridhar, S/o Sattaiah, Aged about.36 years, occ. Employee, " n;;iil;;,-ir,i.*rprr-rvr-un-oli,"rriin.,"ng".. District (Award No'2/1e82-83 dt 30/6i 1981 ) 30/6/91) 20l5182) .--.----..'

10. Nyalam Satislr. S/o Laxmaiah, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Employee, R/o Mank^ondur Virlage and Mandal. Karimnagar Distiict (Award tto.OTt S-S t _bZ Ot 30/5/81) '1 1 . Gajjala-Samprrth, S/o G.Komuraiah, Aged about 43 years, Unemployee, Fl,/o Manakondur tvlandal, (arimangar' Oistrict. H..No. 2-36, M_unjampally (Award No.3/1 977-78 dt23t3t76) -VJIlage, '12. Nylam Kishan S/o Komuraiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Unemploee R/o lvlandal, Karimnblar Dist. H.No. 1-6214, tr/ulkanoor^Village, -Chigurumamirii (Award No.6/1,381-82 dt 30/5/8i) '13.K Sammaiah,Il/o Sailu, Aged- about 36 years Occ. Unemployee, R:/o H.No. 5_ 16, Yq1qlg.t{"Lt Village and Mandat Ka'rimnagar District (A,ivard ruo. 2t7\_tg dated 231311979) ...APPELLANTS AND 1 2 3 4 The Superintendrng Engineer/Member Convenor, G.V.Circle-lV, (SRSp Orgn), L.N/.D Colony, Karimnagar Dist. The Administrator-cum-Chief Engineer, Selection Committee, S.R.S. project, LMD Colony, Karimnagar. The District Co lector-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dis;t. The State of Te,langana, Rep,,Qy its principal Secretary, lrrigation and Command Area Development Diept., Secr6tariat, UyOeraOad, ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants : SRt cUDl MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SpL.Gp attached to . the office of the ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG) W.A.No.S10 OF 2021 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent against the order dated O'110712021 inW.P No 4'1 64 of 2019 on the file of the High Court Between: 1 2 _1, y, ?S, ! ro n!, The Superintending Enoineeri Member.Convenor, G.V. Circle_lV. ( SRSP. gp_,I n-ci rJe N o- 2 i [. lrri.'o' ci'roi'v, Kanmnagar D,sr rict. Karimnagar District. The Administralor-cum-chief Engineer, selection committee s R s proiect (Now Engineer.in-Chief, trrigation, Kirimnagar) LMD Colont, kurir.is;ti District. rrr6w rena meo a J r "igiiio .1 Karimnagar District. .

3. The District corrector-cum-chairman, selection committee Karimnagar, 4. The state of relanoana. rep by its principal secretary r and cAD Department, Secretariat Hyde;ra6ad i I ...APPELLANTS ,:i:i. AND N/ Srikanth, S/o tVlallesham aged about 27 years, Unemployed FUo H No 9-5- 1 8O/8/A, Shivanagar Ramnagar Karimnagar Karimnagar District ...RESPONDENTS IANO:2 OF 2Q21 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order daled 011O712021 in W.P.No. 4164 of 2019 pending disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Appellant : SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL.GP attached to . the office ofthe ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO The Courtmade the following: COMMON JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE Dt. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI WRIT APPEAL Nos.42O & 51O of 2O2l COMMON JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble SP,J) Sri G Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the appellarrts in W.A.No.42O of 2027, Sri S. Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned Additional Advocate General, for the respondent(s) in W.,{.No.420 of 2O2l and for the appellants in W.A.No.S1O of 2O2l and Sri M. Ramgopal Rao, learned counsel for respondent in W.A.No.51O of 2021.

2. Regard being had to the similitude of the questions involved, on the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, matters rvere finally heard.

3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties reached 1.o a consensus. It is agreed that in W.p.No.4164 of 2O19, u,hile fiLng counter, respondent No. 1 in paragraph Nos. 1O and 12 placed heary reliance on memo dated 14.05.2O10, to bolster \ the submission that the said memo was never considered in the a previous round of litigation and in the light of said memo, the appellants clairn is barred by limitation. Since this point has not been consicierec. it is agreed that impugned orders in both the t 2 '.: j'rr-iari appeals may be set aside and the matter may be restored in the hle of the writ court by giving riberty to the parties to fire relevant legal provisions etc. The Writ Court may be requested to decide the matter afresh after hearing the parties.

4. In view of consensus arrived at, the impugled order dated 12.08.2021 in W.A.No.42O of 2O2l is set aside and the common order dated o1.o7.2021 in w.A.No.Slo of 2o2r is set aside to the extent of W.P.No.4164 of 2019. Liberty as prayed for is given to the parties to file relevant legal provisions before the writ court. The Writ Court is requested to re-hear the parties ald decide the matters expeditiously, preferably within sixty days from today. The parties are at liberty to raise all possible grounds .

5. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals are disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the cases. No costs Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand ! L- , ,--. closed. To, 1 The Superintending Engi orgn), L.M.D.ColonY, Ka SD/-B.SAWAVATHI TYREGTSTRAR D //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER neer/Member Convenor, G V'Circle-lV' (SRSP rimnagar Dist Selection Committee, S'R S Project'

2. The Administrator-cum-Chief Engineer' LMD ColonY, Karimnagar'

3. The District Collector-cum-Chairman' Selection Committee' Karimnagar' 4. The Principal Secretary, lrrigation,and-Command Area Development Dept ' Karimnagar Dist. State of T6langana' Secretariat' HyderaDao'

5. One CC to SRI GUDI IIADHUSUDHAN REDDY' Advocate' TOPUC] I I i

6. One CC to SFll w.RAMGOPAL RAO, Advocate. tOpUCl 7. Two CCs to ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] B, fhe Section Officer, Writ-Service Section, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyd erabad.

9. The section officer, Posting section, High court for the State of relangana at Hyderabad.

10. Two CD Copir:s. BSK w HIGH COURT \ DATED:0910112025 g s'tA iQ 1 'iz \.J 1s l[\\ lffl i,' JUDGMENT WA.No.420 o12021 +-. L^.,F r\o 6LC I r.-zt DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEALS WITHOUT COSTS ^..ofd 9<" a-J ,