✦ High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,309 words

11.Smt. G. Ranr, W/o.G. Gopal Chary Aged about 44 years. Occ Street Vending 12. Smt. Y. Adilakshmi, W/o. Y. Ramasubba Rao Aged about 55 years, Occ Street Vending

13. Smt. Nusrath Jahan, W/o. lVd. I\,4 iraj Ahnred Aged about 42 years, Occ Street Vend ing

14.Smt. G. Mangamma, Wio.G. Saidulu Aged about 33 years, Occ Street Vend ing All are Fl/o. C/o. Telangana Street Vendors and Hawkers Union H. No.18-3- 44811 , Laxmi Nagar O/s. Aliabad, Hyderabad -500053 AND 1 2 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS 3 State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary i:partment of lt,lunicipal Administratron and Urban D6velopment SecretariaiU r Cings, Hyderabad 4 The Greater Hyderabad fVlunicipal Corporation, Rep .r r15 Commissioner and Chairperson Town Vending Committee, Lower Tank F L nd, Hyderabad 5. The Deputy Commissioner, GHIVC, Circle-11, Serilrrrc: lpally Hyderabad 6. Commissioner of Police. Cyberabad, Hyderabad 7. Additional Commrssioner of Police (Traffic), Hyder: r rrj and l\,,lember Town Vending Police Control Room, Hyderabad

8. The Station House Officer lrladhapur Traffic pol c :, Sltation I\,4adhapur, Cyberabad, Hyderabad

9. The Station House Offrcer, Hyderabad [Viyapur Traffic Pc]i I, Slation Cyberabad Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lr:: circumstances statcd in the affidavit filed therewith, th: pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction il the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of th,: 3 rn not implementing the provisions of The Street \,, Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 as ; vrolation of the procedure laid down under the said Act ,r I law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and cr r Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to implement the provisions of lr- direct the Respondent Nos.4 to g not to harass the pet t r r eviction, confiscation of goods etc. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO 5575s OF 2016) RESPONDENTS :r praying that in the *{igh Court rray be re 1>articu Iarly one rn Res ponden t Nos.1 to rrlo rs (P'otection of r5itrar,/. illegal and in a Iso contrary to the seq uently d rrect Ihe sai,l Act and further :rs by im cosing fine. Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in tht ;ircumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High co" 1 may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.4 to g not to harass the F etitioners herein by imposing fine, eviction, confiscation of goods etc., in viola: rn of Section 3(3) of The street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulat< n of Street Vending) Act, 2014", pending disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MOGILI ANAVENI (Nor PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2, 6 to 9: SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.4 & 5: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER TI{E HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.'II KARAMJI WRIT PETITIO N No.45225 OF 2\ 16 ORDI]R [']ris u,rit I)ctit1()n is filcd seekinq tirr ,e Iirllor" irrq rclrcf: -' i) rssuc ltrt rrPProPriarc Writ, Oldcr or .l L prir-ttcrr)ur-h one in thc rraturc of \X'rit of \[andrul r rlrt actiorr oi thc ltcspondcrtr \t.rs.1 to i itr rrot 'L t rlri lr.or isiorrs ol 'l'hc Strcct Ycn,Jors (l)r r' I .n cliho, rd ancl l{cguletir>rr oi Srcct YcndLrrg) \ .rrlritrrrri. illcqal rntl in r-iollrion of thc proccdur' rrnclrr r hc saicl -\ct rrnrl tlso coflran' to tlrc la\\' l. L rirr Ilon'blc Supr-crrrc (iourr and conscgucntlt lit sporrrlr:nt )ios. 1 lo 3 to implcmcnf thc pror i.t srrrcl ,\cL rrrrd lirtthct. clircct thc Ilespondcnt Nos.1 r lrrlirss rhe l)critiorrcrs lrv inrposing {inc, c',tctior.t. : ol srx,cls crc.. ancl pass such orhcr and further. ir-, rirs H,,n-irlc (-otu.t .lccms tit ard propcr irt rht t i', , I rlrt i.L.c rn,-i in thc int(r(st of ilrsticc " c t'()11 lllr)l( ctcr-llt trrr,. lcntcn trnr'. ', ,1,,t, ol , 2(rl Lrs ilriLl (1, ,\\ r r clo.r'rr ir,, .lirci r tit,.' ns , )l tlr( r 9 ,rot t,, rrtlsclti,,rr r rs t lriL lr lnlSi,lIl(L:, 2 Nonc appcars on bchalfof thc pctirioncrs 3 I lrar-c hcard N{r.G.N{adhu Sudhan I{,: ldr-. lcrt ncd Starrclir-rs Counsei frrr Greater lJyderaba: i\Irrnic ipal Corporatiorr appcaring for respondent Nos. I ancl 5 arrd Nlr.lt.l.axmikanth Rcdd1,, learned Assistant lor-crnnLcnt Pleade r for Horre appearing for respondent Nc .5 to 9 2

4. Leatned Standing (lotrnsei for rcsponrlent Nos.4 and 5 rvor-rld submit tl.rat the provisions of 'l l'rc Strcct Vendors (l)rotcction of Livclihood and ltcgulation of Stt'cct Vcncline) ..\ct, 201-1, is being irnplemented ancl thct'c is nt, spccitic 11tS tance rcporred bv thc peuuoners, thus. thc contcst in the peution as the statutc is being implcrr-rcntcrl. clocs not sLu1'1vc

5. Learned ,.\ssistant Cl ovcrnme nt l)lqLclcL lirr I Ior-r-rc ri,ould submit that the respondent poltcc arc n( )t tntcrterlnrl or not causing anv impcdimcnt to irrrplctncrrt the Provisions of the Act. 2014

6. I have peruscd the materials on re colcl

7. Having regard to thc prat,er and submissrons of the rcspondents, the Act is being implemcnte d, continuation of this petition furfher is found not necessatl. Horver.cr, reserving the rights of thc petitioncrs to avail appropliate 3 pctition or a\ rrll ()1he 1 retrcdics availablc undcl : .\', this \\'rit pe tition is clisposctl oF.'lhere sha1l be no ordcr iti l() costs. tr{iscelllncorrs l)t't ttions, pending iI AII\ . s lrtli s ta nd closccl SD/- I .BHAVANI SWAMY nSS,: rerut REGISTRAR '\ --- - To, //TRUE COPYi/ Telanoana. ',:,1i1""3 li c:li,'dli"dJ:i;v.";-iT! 6'i H vdera oad becrtoru oFFlcER 1. The Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings' Saifabad ' lyderabarl' State of r The Principal Secretary, Department of Home : lcretariat Buildings' , ?n";*:l;i,.i;?1,!e.ii"33f3n."nt of rr,4unicipar A,rr rist,ation and Urbar Deveropment Secri:tarii^5u"iffli'r":fl"l"t'3;".ttfi '! f3L?:93:' N/lunrc,par * L:?," :,?,T[ f 5 The Deputy Co,n"'tt'on"f 6iirvrC Ci'"r"-1 1 Serilinl pallv Hycerabac d lne commiss ,ner o[ eoi,te, cyoerauad, Hyder.abadF] r r rrahzd arrd N4emher ) r'ri" l;Jiii;'rat Lt-'trrmisstoner of Police (l.rafirc)' ' i;;; V"noing Polrce C^ontrol Room' HYder.abad- - 'rvi'iri'pili Traffic Po'i ' Stalion [t'4adhapur 8 The Station u.,u'u u'riiiJi , ?;!"tirlld"n',1311?'oou,"er, ri'4ivapur rrarric Polrci Station cvberabad' Hvderabad 10 or"".,"#i; SRI N4oGtLl aNAVFNI. Advocate lopucl j'F:i:: j:"'sltxA'+'-z'-'^tltilt*''BY-i?8x'r;il'b""l;'6r-theState ,. +t-*fn:t"i;?'3fi'ffS$i?'r.il- & ,RBAN DEV - sh court ror the State " t4TwoCC-stoopron""ub.rilE.,rrignCourtforthtl:lateofTelanganaat "ii"L"o"na ar HYderabad [oUTl HYderabad [OUT] { ,HNIC lopuc] l

15. Two CD CoPtes BSR TKS ?i'rr, HIGH COURT DATED: 2810812025 ORDER WP.No.45225 of 2016 ,-.. 'I S l: ( il 6 JIN it?6 J ) . . /.::--. ,. . \ .,.],\ \:-.,- ' ,:-i.: a ), \ * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS @l*,r. \o\ulr!

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments