Alla Rajasekhar @ Raja v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JUNROR CIVIL
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS ptaying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Kalloor Police Station, Khammam District to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.103/2O25 of Kalloor Police Station, Khammam District, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C SHARAN REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the sole Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER t t I I i I I i I i i The Hon'ble Sri lus tlCe I.Sreenivas Rao alP titio No 25 t20 Order, This (.riminal Petition ts filed by the peritioner/accused No.12, secking anticipatory bail undet Section 'i82 of Bharatil'a Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 'BNSS), in connecton with Ctime No.103 ol 2025 on thc file of Station llousc Offlcer' I{alloor Police Station, I{hammam Disuict, reqisrcrcd for thc o[fences punishable undct Sections 74, 189, 191(2)' I91' 132' 351(2) r/rv 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhira, 2023 (fol short 'llNS) ancl Section 7 (1) of Criminal Amencllr-rcnt Act' 1932 ([or short'(-L AcC).
Fleard Nlr. C.Sharan Reddy, learned sotrnscl f<rr thc pctitioncr/accuscd No.12 and Mr' Syed Yasar: l{atnoon' learnecl Aclditional Public Prosecutor appcting for the rcspondeut 2 \.. 3 During the course of hcalng, it is brought to the notice of this Court rhat the offences leveled against thc pctiuoner/accused No.12 are punishable with imprisonmcnt upto sevefl years only. 4 In view of the same, rvithout going inro thc merirs of the case, this Court dcems it appropriate to direct the petitioner/accused No.12 ro appear before the invcstigating officer on or beforc 24.07.2025. On such appcarancc of thc petirioner,/accused No.12, the invesrigatrng officer sha]l scrupulously follow the proccdure contcmplatcd undcr Sect.ion 35(3) of the BNSS and the guidclines rssucd bv the Apcx Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Biharl
It is made clear that the petitroner/accused No.12 shall cooperate with the inves tigating officer for rhc invcsrigatron and make themselves available to tl.re inves tiga ting officer as and wherr-- required and also provide the '(2014) 8 scc 273 3 in formation / documen ts AS sought by him ro conc ude the ln\.es tlllatlon.
6 If the petiuoner/accused No.12 fail ro co()l)erate with the inr.estigaring officcr for invesrigation, the investrgatin5; officer is at libcrq. ro rake action against the pet_itioner/accuse,i No.12 tn accoldancc witl-r lau,.
Subjecr ro rhc abovc dir-ecrions, the Crimural pe ition is clisposed of As a sequel, miscellaneous pet_itions, pending if an.r, stand closecl To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- E}.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR secrrlN?rrcen
The Junror Civil Judge cum Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sathupalli, Khammam District
2. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Kollapur, Khammanr District 3 Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderirbad (OUT)
One CC to SRl. C SHARAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies TPK HIGH COURT DATED:1610712025 ORDER CRLP.No.8425 o12025 =;:.--. o TH , 'Lr t 17 JUL 2M ., * CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED CIF
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.