West Godavari District v. West Godavari District
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file
Provisions considered
- Electricity Act, 2003 ss. 127, 127(2)
Judgment
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri C.Gunaranjan, Advocate representing Sri C.Kodandaram. Counsel for the Respondent : Sri D.V.N.Acharya, Advocate representing Sri M.Subba Rao 14th FEBRUARY 2006 Per G.S.Singhvi, C.J. This appeal is directed against order dated 23-4-2004 vide which the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant against the demand created by Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Eluru vide Proceedings No. SE/O/ELR/DE.T/ AAE.T2/F.doc/ D.No.827/04, dated 23-3-2004. A perusal of the order under appeal shows that the learned Single Judge refused to entertain the appellant’s challenge to the demand created by the Superintending Engineer concerned on the ground that an effective alternative remedy of appeal is available to the writ petitioner. Learned counsel for the appellant made efforts to persuade us to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge by arguing that the so-called remedy of appeal available to his client cannot be treated as an effective alternative remedy, but gave up his attempt in the midst of the arguments and submitted that his client may be permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 subject to the deposit of 1/3rd of the demand. He further submitted that in the appeal, his client may be allowed to raise all legally permissible objections. In our opinion, the request made by the learned counsel is reasonable and merits acceptance. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file appeal within a period of thirty days from today. The appellant shall also be entitled to make an application to the appellate authority for entertaining the appeal subject to the condition of deposit of 1/3rd amount in terms of Section 127 (2) of Electricity Act, 2003 and also raise all legally permissible objections against the order of assessment. The appellant shall be free to withdraw 1/3rd amount deposited by him in furtherance of interim order dated 29-4-2004 passed by the Division Bench in WAMP.No.1538 of
#2004. G.S. SINGHVI, C.J. 14th February, 2006. ARS/vtv G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Electricity Act, 2003 — ss. 127, 127(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 14 Feb 2006. The bench was G BHAVANI PRASAD.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.