Writ Petition No. 26715 of 2011 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 12 Sep 2011
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and Asst. Govt. Pleader for Irrigation, who takes notice for respondents, the Court made the following.
ORDER:
Sd/- SABITHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (Contd. 3. ) For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR . 3 . To
The Commissioner of Fisheries, Masthya Bhavan At Shanthi Nagar, Masab Tank, Hyderabad
The Assistant Director of Fisheries, D.C. Road, Kadapa District 3. The Fisheries Development Officer, B.Mattam Village & Mandal, Kadapa District
The Divisional Forest Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District 5. The Forest Range Officer, Vontimitta, Kadapa District 6. Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Fisheries, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Forest, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Irrigation, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
One CC to Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
One spare copy. BV HIGH COURT CVNR.J DATED: 23-09-2011 NOTE: PUT UP THIS WRIT PETITION ALONG WITH W.P.NO. 5009 AND 32112 OF 2010 UNDER THE CAPTION ‘FOR ORDERS’ ON 10-10-2011 ORDER W.P.NO. 26715 OF 2011 DIRECTION DRAFTED: BY BV DATED : 24-09-2011 HIGH COURT CVNR.J DATED: 23-09-2011 NOTE: PUT UP THIS WRIT PETITION ALONG WITH W.P.NO. 5009 AND 32112 OF 2010 UNDER THE CAPTION ‘FOR ORDERS’ ON 10-10-2011 ORDER W.P.NO. 26715 OF 2011 DIRECTION
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 12 Sep 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.