Shivaram Prasad Kammili v. Veera Venkata Lakshmi Durga Pepakayala
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RENUKA YARA
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ss. 24, 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscelianeous Petition is a.llowed. H.M.O.p.No.222 of 2024 stands transferred from the file of the learned principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Sangareddy District, to the lile of the learned I Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru. The Court concerned is…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw HIVOP.No-222 of 2024 on the file of Principal Senior Civil J ud ge-cum -Assis [a nt Sessions Judge, Sangareddy District, and transfer the same to 1't Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru, to be tried along with FCOP.No.529 of 2025 on the file of 1st Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the proceedings in HtvlOP.No.222 ol 2024 on the file of Principal Senior Civil J udg e-cum-Assistan t Sessions Judge, Sangareddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOKARO SAPNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SUNKARA KALYAN DILEEP The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA Tr.C.M.P.No .26L of 20.25
ORDER:
Heard Smt. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, learn:d counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Sunkara Kalvan Dileep, lealncd counsel appeared through online for the respondent. Perused the record
This 'i'rar-rsfer Civil Miscellaneous petition is filed under Secti,:rt 24 ol the Code of Civil procedure, 19Og, by the petitioner-wife to transler H.M.O.p.No.222 of 2024 pcnding on t':le lile of the learned principal Senior Civil Judge cum Assistant Sessions Judge, Sangarecldy District, to the file ol learned I Additional Fam, ly Court Judge at Kalpataru.
Learnr:d cour-rsel for the petitioner represented that the petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.222 of 2024 bt:fore the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge-curn-l\ssistar-rt Sessions Judge, Sangareddy District and the resipondent filed F.C.O P.No.529 of 2025 before the learned I 2 RY,J TRCMP 261 2025 '.. .ri:, Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru. He also represented that in case H.M.O.p and F.C.O.p are listed together on the sarne day, it is convenient for both the parties to attend the matters.
Learned counsel for the respondent reported objcction.
In view of the consensus arrived betu, een the parties, the relief sought by the petitioner is grar.r ted by transferring H.M.O.p.No.222 of 2024 from the lile of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge_cum_Assistant Sessions Judge, Salgareddy District, to the file of the learned I Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru.
Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscelianeous Petition is a.llowed. H.M.O.p.No.222 of 2024 stands transferred from the file of the learned principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Sangareddy District, to the lile of the learned I Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru. The Court concerned is hereby directed to transmit the entire case file reiating to H.M.O.P.No.222 of 2024, after duly indexed, rvithin a 3 RY,J TRCMP 261 2025 period of r11g (01) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, under intimation to the other side. There shal be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if aly, pending in this petition. sh all stand closed. Agqsr SD/. U.SUDHA NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I i S TION OFFICER To, '1. The I Additional Family Court Judge at Kalpataru. 2 The Principal senior civil Judge-cum-Assistant sessions Judge, sangareddy District.
3. One CC to Sri Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 4. One CC to Sri Sunkara Kalyan Dileep, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies NVB/PSL M. i I 1 \ .... ..\ 'ia. ", -li ':J j, t[T 2025 i,i \-... -<,. / ,.,t,,. --'.' :; 'rt.t 1;,,i .2' -':-::- = ---i' HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 ORDER TRCMP.No.261 of 2025 ALLOWING THE TR.C.M.P 1! P&A W f'"1{
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.