✦ Telangana High Court

6213, Choppadandi Village and lr,4andal, Karimnagar District, T.G v. Choppadandi Village and l\rlandal, Karimnagar Dist., T.G

C V BHASKAR REDDY3 min read

Case at a glance

Judgment

Sri. Nune Narsaiah, S/o. Late Rajaiah, aged 58 years, Occ ; Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No 7-6213, Choppadandi Village and lr,4andal, Karimnagar District, T.G .....PETITIONER AND

1.

The State of Telangana. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretanat, Hyderabad, T.G.

2.

The-District Collector, Karrmnagar District, office at Karimnagar Town and Dist., T.G.

3.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar Division and District, T.G.

4.

The Tahasildar, Choppadandi fi/landal, Karimnagar Dist., T.G.

5.

Tallapalli Lachaiah, Sio Ramarah, aged about 55 years, Occ. Agriculture Rl,/o Choppadandi Village and l\rlandal, Karimnagar Dist., T.G. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent No.2 to 4, in not considering the petitioner's Bhu Bharathi Application No.17020070235, dated.19-06-2025, submitted in continuation of earlier Online application Transaction l.D No. 05T513800000863, dated.05/04-02 -2O25and No. RC2300009002,dated.21 -09-2023 representations dated .30-12-2024, 16-12-2024 and 14-12-2024 for issuance of pattadar pass book in respect of agricultural land admsg., Ac.1-2150 gts in sy.,No.1099/A srturted at choppadandi Village and Manor I Kar-irnnagar District, lS. on the basis of agreement of sale dated.O.l -07-2i)r 3 executed by the respondent No.5, since then to till this date. as highly lleg:tl. arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Bhu Bharathi Act-2025 a,r l amounts to violation of articles of corrstitution of lndia and principles o ratura! justice and consequently direcl the respondents more parlicularly thr: :r;ponrlents No.

2 to 4 to rssue new patta(lar pass book in respect of the above -r:ntirtned agricultural Iands to the petitioner forthwith. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Underr Section 151 cPC praying that in the (; r'ums:ances stated rn the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High corr-r 62y be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly the respondents l'., o 2 to 4 to issue new pattadar pass book in respect of the agricultural land adn ;. ., Ao i _2150 gts in sy ,No 1099/4 situatec at choppadandi Village and Mand;r Kar rrnagar District, TS pending disposai of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRt BETHI VENKATESWARLL Counsel for the Res; pondent Nos.1 to 4 : Gp FOR REVENL,a Counsel for the Res; pondent No.5 : -. The Court made th€ following ORDER =7@,.1: .'. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19471 of 2O25 ORDER Sri Bcthi Vcnkateshu'arllr, It:ar-r'red counsel fbr thc petitioncr seeks pcrrnission ol this Corrrt to vr.it Irdr:rr,r, thc urt-it pelitiorl rvitl'r a libertr' to avail r'crncc]it,s in accorcl:rncc u'ith las.

2. Pcrmission is uccorded-

3. Accordingll,, the Writ Petitiorr is clisrnrssccl as u'ithdrarrr-r ',vith Iibert-y as prayecl [or. There shall lte no orclcr zrs to cosLs As a sequel, tlie rniscellaneous petitions pcrrcling, if any, s[.rall star-rd closec.l //TRUE COPY// SD/. C. DEEPIKA SI TANT RE GIST CTION OFFICER Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the S 8'":"bt?; dHid Etr r vE N KAr E swARLu' Ad vo cate [oP u cl uvclerabad. [OUT] Two CD CoPies of Telangana at To 1 2 3 SA PVL HIGH COUR'I DATED:0810'712025 ORDER WP.No.1947'l of 2025 :. \. 2 4 ir.r ?1}15 \ .,) *'/ --) DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. / t.+ g,Zo {

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments