The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandrm of Grounds of criminal Petition' the High cgyrt- [av be pleased to grant stav-oi afi further proceedinos in FIR No423/2022' dr.o2lo5t2o22of PS Uppall n"""r''i'"ti' i"t in99tr9""! U/Sec 420' 406 of IPC and Sec. 3 (1)(x) SC ST PdA;ct and Sec 156 (3) Cr'P'C'' including arrest of the petitioners. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022 Between: Nathi Vijay Kumar, S/o Late Balaiah, Aged about 54 Yrs, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.3-49, SC Colony, Boduppal, Medipally, Medchal, Malkajgiri District. ... Petitioner/2nd RespondenUcomplainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2022 AND

1. Gubba Sujatha, Wo. Gubba Srinivasulu Gupta, Aged about 60 Yrs, Occ. Business, R/o. '17-1 50, Sri Ram Nagar, Beside Electricity Office, Jedcherla Village 8 l\/andal, Mahaboobnagar - 509 301

2. Gubba Surender Gupta, S/o. Sreenivasulu Gupta Aged about 39 Yrs, Occ. Business, R/o. 17-150, Sri Ram Nagar, Beside Electricity Office, Jedcherla V and M Mahaboobnagar - 509 301. ...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2022 3 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through SHO, PS Uppal, Cyberabad, RR District. (But in FtR the Police shown as Rachakonda d istrict) ..RespondenUState in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2022 Petition under Section 320 (6) of CRPC R/w Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminat Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Permit the petitioner to compound the offences which is subject matter of Crime No.423l2022 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda Com m iss ionerate. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2022 Petition under Section 320 (2) of CRPC R/w Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the terms of compromise and quash the proceedings in Crime No.4231022 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda Comm iss io nerate. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri y.Balaji, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri E.Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri A.Prabhakar Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: GOMMON ORDER :m-"w HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2022 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.5585 ot 2022 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioners/accused Nos.'1 and 2 to quash the proceedings against them in F.l.R.No.423 of 2022 of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda Limlts of Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420,406 of lPC, 3(1) (v) of SC/ST (POA) Act. 2 lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised \ the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2022 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences

3. Vide order dated 14.07.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal .: : a\ ,.,rip . ..x \ 2 Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 22.07.2025 and the same is placed on record

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2022 are allowed Consequently. this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos'i and 2 in F.l.R.No.423 ot 2022 of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda Limits of Cyberabad, are hereby quashed Miscellaneous applications, if any pending. shall stand closed SD/- S.MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ '! ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XXIX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Hasthinapuram 2. The Stalion House Officer, Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to Sri Y Balaji, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri A.Prabhakar Rao, Advocate [OPUCj 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] r NVB/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2510712025 ,r'-1,- \ ., iT4 Lr i :i 2o ," MiltB 9cspATc HEo t ((.(' z o I -ar. COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2022 ln/And CRLP.No.5585 ot 2022 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 / //1 4S z/r,'/tf MEMORANDUM OF INTERLOCUT FTLED UNDER SECTION 32 OAil 0tofi' APPLICATION cR.P.C, TUW. SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C I{IGH COURT FORTIIE STATE OF TELAGANA AT TIYDERABAD I.A.NO. oF 2022 IN Crl.Petition No.5585 Of 2022 Bctween: Nathi Vijay Kumar, S/o.Balaiah, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Bttsiness, R/o.H.No.3-49, SC CotonY, BoduPPal, Medipally, Mcdchal-lr4alkaj giri District. .. Petitioner/2nd RespondenV ComPlainant AND l. Gubba Sujatha, Wo.Gubba Srinivasulu Gupta, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Blisiness, R/o.H.No.17-150, Sri Ram }irgar, Beside Elcctricity Office, Jedcherla village and Manda[, Mahabubnagar District.

2. Gubba Surender Guptha, S/o.Gubba Srinivasulu Gupta, Aged about 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o.I l.No.l7-150, Sri Ram Nagar, Beside Electricity Officc, Jedcherla village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. .. Respondents/Petitioners/Accused

3. The State of Telangana, reprcsented by its Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Tclangana at Flyderabad. JOINT MEMO . Respondent /State

1. It is submitted that the petitioner / Complainant filed Private Complaint in the court of III ldetropolitan Magistrate at L.B.Nagar, R.R District against the respondents 1 and 2 stating inter alia on the N v; S4t1'/ Ct q"rt I &,1 g E-r'WHjEli...;, assurance givcn by the respondents No.i and 2, lf thc amounls arc invested with them, they promised to give good retutns' 'the petitioner believing their version, gave a sum of Rs 20,00,000/- Lo the lcspondents I and 2 for iuvest metlt. On r eceipt ofthe said alnount' they executccl promissory notc. But tlre respondet-rts I and 2 did not stluck to thcir plomise, ri'hen the petitioner caused enquiry' they rcluctant ans\\/er ancl they cluarrelled with him u'hcn demanded the plincipal alrlounts ancl plolits. Thc l-carncd MagistLatc referred the con-rplaint tO the police for rcgistration of the criurc and invcstigation. 'I'[re Station I louse Officer', I-Jppal Police Station on receipt of referred cornplaint, registered a case in Crime No'423 12022 tnder Section 420' 406 IPC ancl Section 3 ( 1) (v) of SCs/S'I's (POA) Act' It is strbrnitted that thc respondents 1 and 2 filed the abovc 2. Crl.P.No.55li5 ol 2022 secking to quash the procccdings in Crirne No.423l2Lrll registered unde| Section 42O,406IPC and Section 3 (1) (v) of SCs/S l's (POA) Act.

3. It is submitted that ctLrling the pendency of the above Criminal petition, the disputes betweetr the petitioner and the respondents 1 and 2 were sortcd ottt amicably at the intervention of rvell wishers and friends. ltr vies' of thc anricable settlement arrived between the N.L,iYIW l-1 Ci ^rt^ t petitioner and the respondents I and 2, the petitioner is not willing to pursue the pr-oceedings in Crin.rc No.423 of Z0ZZ on the flle of Uppal Police Station. Thc proceedings in Crime No.423 of 2022 tnay be quasl-red, in the intcrest ofjustice. It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the tenns of comprotnise and quash the proceedings in Crime No.42312022 on the file of Ufipal Police Station, Rachakonda Clommissioneratc and pass such other orders or orders as this I lon'ble Court ma1' deem fit artd proper in the circr,rmstances of thc case ('t'u' nv{ 1 2.q 2"d l{espondent / De-facto cornplainrrnt Petitoiners/Accused ( irunsel fbr the 2 resporl n Ilyderabad Date:24.11.2022 Y,b Counsel for the et p toncrs