Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is that she has filed an application on 16.4.2004 for grant of mining lease to an extent of Ac.
234.44 in S.Nos. 613 to 616, 606B to 609, 598, 599A, 861, 597, 600A, 596, 581, 582B, 582A, 580, 849, 872, 871, 870 & 850 of Bukkapuram Village, Bethamcherla Mandal, Kurnool District, before the 4th respondent and the same is not yet forwarded to the concerned authorities for their consideration. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the 4th respondent is directed to consider forwarding the application filed by the petitioner on 10.11.2006 to the 3rd respondent, if the same is in order as per law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dt. 28.05.2008 KA C.V. RAMULU,J ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To
#1. 2CCs to G.P. for Mines and Geology, High Court of A.P. Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
#2. 2CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.