Serlingampally v. 3 Station House Officer, A.P.T.S., Ranga Reddy District (North)
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 28 Sep 2004
- Bench
- G ROHINI
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, granting leave and liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
- Electricity Act, 2003 s. 49(B)
Judgment
Cause title
M/s. Laxmi Engineering Works a Proprietary concern, having its office at Shop No. 8 and 9, Saroja Complex, Opp. KBHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad factory at Plot No. 20 MIE, Hafizpet, Serlingampally Mandal, R.R. District rep by its Proprietor Mr. M.S.N. Raju ..... PETITIONER
AND 1 A.P. TRANSCO, rep by its Joint Managing Director, (Vigilance), Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Electrical/Operation, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Kukatpalli, R.R. District. 3 Station House Officer, A.P.T.S., Ranga Reddy District (North). .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the provisional assessment notice vide Lr.No. ADE/O/KUP/D.No. 1341 dt. 12-4- 2001 issued by the respondents demanding Rs.18,60,000/- towards compounding fee in respect of service connection 186 of the petitioner concern as arbitrary, illegal exorbitant and in violation of Sec.49 (B) of Indian Electricity Act 1910 as well as violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently stay all further proceedings pursuant to the said notice, including the arrest of the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.SURYA SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.M.VINOBHA DEVI The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.15313 OF 2004
ORDER:
Operative part
Sri G.Ratna Sudhakar, representing Sri T.Surya Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to institute fresh proceedings with appropriate relief. Accordingly, granting leave and liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Date: 28.9.2004. Mdaa. _____________ (G.ROHINI,J) Copy to: 1 A.P. TRANSCO, rep by its Joint Managing Director, (Vigilance), Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Electrical/Operation, A.P.C.P.D.C.L., Kukatpalli, R.R. District. 3 Station House Officer, A.P.T.S., Ranga Reddy District (North).
Two C.D.Copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, granting leave and liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226; Electricity Act, 2003 — s. 49(B).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 28 Sep 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.