Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
District. 4. Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Arts, Science & Commerce College, Markapur Prakasam District, represented by its Secretary & Correspondent (R-4 Dismissed the default vide court order dt. 1/12/99.) 5. The Principal, Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Arts, Science & Commerce College, Markapur, Prakasam District. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner as Lecturer in the .....RESPONDENTS
Commerce in the 4th respondent-College and pending regularisation of his services, to pay the regular scale on par with the regular Lecturers. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.DHARMESH Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER:
When the matter has come up for hearing today, none appeared for the petitioner and also there is no representation on his behalf. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. _______________
(D.S.R.VARMA, J)
24.09.2004 MDAA/KRK To
The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, A.P., Hyderabad.
The Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Guntur, Guntur District.
The Principal, Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Arts, Science & Commerce College, Markapur Prakasam District.
Two CCs to Government Pleader for Education, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T)
2 CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 24 Sep 2004. The bench was D S R VARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.