High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
that in the circumstances Ct*i"3111ition' the High Court may be stated in the Memorand"'li c"r--*"it oleased to quash tne ent're?rIc""l'"gJ i" s c PoCSo No 40g of 2o22 on the file "i court at L B Nasar at Hasthinapuram' :iffi$;i;;ocSo l.A. NO: 10F 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P'C or 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in r#' ft'f"'"t'"Oum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the all further Proceedings in Hioh court may be p'";;;''i;';"nt 't'v of s.L.pocso.No.409 of zo;;;tn" tii" ot tt'" s'oe913r PoCSo court at L'B' Nagar li"nrtinY'.""-prram penaing disposal of the main petition , I.A. NO:2OF 2025 BETWEEN: E3,:&|,ffi#kiHffi riJ:?ffi gi1'f#,#:'n:i:n?f i:il".s".,ffJl;., ... petitioner/De-facto comprainant in r.A.Ncis.2 and 3 0f 2025 AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its public prosr station Hish c;rt'or rer,n6#, strtfi,i;;d:?B:t:, saroor Nasar potice '?ffif 2. Mane Mahesh Kum: ...Respondent in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ,:s,,#il1,,l?#[", j,s.,tji?irst?bts:fl #r";:.;f i,..,?g:i,?,"# ...RespondenUAccused in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S Petition under Section. 320(6), 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in *re uemoraio#ii'oiornos of criminar petition, the High court mav be oreased.to p"r*t i-n"'pJti,,orll'"no resoondent No.2 who is the defacto-comptainant to and to altow the above Cri.p, i :; 1,'i J :: i fi i.ffi ,T#' e ;i'& i ;' ;i J- Ii !- o1', n u s p c i a r i; o is o" c J,,i,, 9gTp91lO the .offence " t.A. NO:3 oF 202s petition under Section .320(2), 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the . crrcumstances stated in *re. tvtemoranorni ii'oilrnos of criminar petition. the High Court may be pteased totec";Jth. ";;p;ri[. ,no compound the offence i'l,i;?,1??33;["ri:,',:t zozz oi tnl'i,J"#nn"""Spu.iar pocso co,.t ,il e This petition comin G ro u n d s or c.i., i n,i p.i ;,:"::,t"X ffi :"^. jffi i^.J,:[r, J::,yT "#.[H"iJ Bhaskar' Advocate for the petition", sri iiti""nder Rao Veeramara, Additionar Public Prosecutor on behalf of Responden, ,u., ""0 of Sri Vishnu vardhan, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. "no The Court made the foilowing: ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA I.A.N os.2 in/and 3of 2 025 CRIM INALPE TITI ONN o.8 464 of 2025 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in SC POCSO No'409 of 2022 on the file of Special POCSO Court at L.B Nagar at Hasthinapuram' for the offences 354(D)' 506 IPC & Section 1 1 read with 12 of POCSO Act.
2. lt is submitted bY learned counsel aPPearing for the the respondent No'2 that during as well as petitioner-accused present Criminal Petition' the parties have pendencY of the comPromised the matter and acco ingly, l.A.Nos '2 and 3 ol 2025 I have been filed to record the co promlse between them and to comPound the offences T ) ) Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the J petition. 4 Vide order dated 30.07.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to apPear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad' for identification and to submit a ( I report. )
5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services committee' has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 07.08.2025 and the same is placed on record.
6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S areallowed. consequen,y' this criminar petition is arowed and the proceedings in SC POCSO No.409 of 2022 on the file of the Special pOCSO Court, L.B. Nagar at Hasthinapuram, againsI the petitioner_accused are hereby quashecl subject to the petitioner_accused paying an amount of Rs.5,0004 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secrerary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/- K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ! G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE GOPY// \ To, Cvberabad at L B.Nagar at Hastinapuram
1. The Special POCSO Court at L.B. Nagar at Hasthinapuram 2.TheXAdditionalJuniorCivilJudge-cum-XXMetropolitanMagistrate, e iil"it"i." ri*." ofri""', Saroor nagar Police-station' Rachakonda ;. i; c;;i" in. Fruri. p;;;;1",., iish court for the state of reransana at 5. 3i': rci; in n"por' Bhaskar' Advocate loPucl Hvderabad (OUT) ---*-''-#. --.'i i .-1r'3ql Advocate IOPUCI
6. One CC to Sri Vishnu Vardhan' 7. Two CD CoPies W ADK/PSL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromtse' *$*ffi51"a'i-$;,.+lfr#'i'rffi HIGH COURT I onr ED:2ltoltzo2s I / ORDER ./. ,-,, .- .- t ; l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.8464 ot 2025 2 4 srp z0r I ..) i ti' it, _) -t ).? * ALLOWING THE CRLP AND tA.NOs.2 & 3 OF 2o2s t7 (Memorandum of Criminal petition (Ulsec.492 of Cr.P.C or U/Sec.52B of BNSS) IN THE HTGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT:: HYDERABAD Crl.P No. Of Z1Zs Against AOC9D S.CnNo.409 of 2022 On the lile of the Hon'ble Special POCSO Cout at L.B. Nagar at Hasthinapuram Between: Mane Mahesh Kumar, S/o Late Bikshapathi, Aged 21 years, Occ: Office Boy, Caste: SC (Mala), R/o H.No. 16-2-7 sLl ki 6t I B,Sai Ram Cotony, Near Sai Baba Temple, Saidabad, Hyderabad District And .. Petitioner/Accused 1 2 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, Saroor Nagar Police Station, High Court of Telangana State, Hyderabad. Pashyam Sunitha, ffo Deva Raju, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Labour Work, Caste: BC-Mudiraj, R/o H.No.11-129/4, Sahithi Nagar Colony, Post Colony, Saroor Nagar, R/o Raichur Village, Kalvakurthy Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. Respondent ....Respondent/ De-facto Complainant. P I IE JOINT M EMO FILED BY TH E BOTH PART]ES The above num tter was settl ed out of court an d ondentaq reed to compro mise and have no Resp ontoC om pound the offence U/S ec. 3s4(D 506 IPC & the Complaint/2!4 obiecti Sec. 11 r 2ofPO cso Act. etitioner re it is The mit th e romi se and com 2022 on th e file o Hasthi na ura Sec.11 r for th 12 of POCSO ftheH e all ra ed that this Hon'ble court m a Accu sed 2 ound the on'ble s Cha e Sheet vide s. ecial PO CSO Cou rt at L. ffences U Sec,3 4 D romr se. MD ln vtew of Co be pleased enter into o. 4O9 of B. Na ar at 506 IPC & Hyderabad .06.2025 \rl l\ re'b,\ tPeI oner nesporf;ent ,.#,:t x e, ffiN,#- \Y Counsel for the petiti Lounsel for the RES s l I