✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 20 Feb 2007

B.Narayana Rao v. The Divisional Forest Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District

Writ Petition No. 3222 of 2007L NARASIMHA REDDY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the

Judgment

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3222 OF 2007

Operative part

O R D E R: The petitioner states that he owns a house at Bellal village of Kadem Mandal, Adilabad District. On retirement from service, he is said to have settled at Adilabad. He states that he has decided to dismantle the house at his village and utilize the timber of the same, for construction of a house at Adilabad. He is said to have submitted an application, under Section 29, read with Section 68(1) of A.P. Forest Act, 1967, on 25.4.2002, before the respondent, seeking permission, duly enclosing the necessary certificates. His grievance is that no order has been passed thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Forest. A.P. Forest Act and the Rules made thereunder, prescribe procedure for grant of permits, to enable the owner of a house, to transport the timber to a different place, for his personal use. A proforma is stipulated there for. The petitioner submitted his application about 4 years ago. There cannot be any justification for not disposing of the application, for such a long time. If the application suffers from any defects, the same have to be pointed out. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent to pass appropriate orders on the application, dated 25.4.2002, submitted by the petitioner, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ 20th February 2007 Note: Issue C.C. in one week. (B/o) PAN

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

A.P. Forest Act, 1967 — ss. 29, 68(1); Government Pleader for Forest. A.P. Forest Act.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Feb 2007. The bench was L NARASIMHA REDDY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3222 of 2007). ← Search more judgments