✦ Telangana High Court

Judgment · High Court

DECREE, SENIOR CIVIL, SENIOR, CIVIL4 min read

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The case of the Petltloners is that theY claim to be owners of rand developed into open ptots in Makthal Vinage and Mandal of Narayanpet District' On the requisition of the Executive Engineer, RBL-II' HW&C Division' Atmakur' an extent of land admeasuring Ac'3-10 gts''…
  • Para 44. Recording ::3:: learned Assistant the submissions of Government Pleader for Land Acquisition' this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No'4/Special Deputy Collector (LA) to follow their own time line and deposit the decreetal amount to the credit of LAOP'No'24 of…
  • Para 55. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed o{' Miscellaneous petitions, if anY, Pending in this writ petition shall stand closed' No costs' ,/TRUE COPY// SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI S STANT REGIS ECTION OFFICER To riat Buit eveloPment) erabad Secreta State of Tel angana at Hyde…

Judgment

PetitionUnderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ' order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not depositing compensation amounts to the Petitioners as per Order and Decree of The Senior Civil Judge, at Narayanpet in LAOP No'24 of 2014 daled 1B'O1 '2023' as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents No l to 4 herein to deposit the decreetal amounts to the credit of LAop No.24/2014, on the fire of the court of rhe Senior Civil Judge, at Narayanpet. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the writ petition, the High court may be preased to issue interim directions, directing the Respondents No.1 to 4 herein to deposit the decreetar amount due to the petitioners herein in pursuance of the order and Decree of rhe Senior civil Judge, at Narayanpet in LAop No. 24 of 2014 dated 1810112023 forthwith, pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the petitioners : SRI N.PRAVEEN REDDY 3:i1.,_"#.Jll,"rRespondent No.1 : Gp FoR tRRt AND coMM AREA Counset for the Respondent No.2 : G.p FOR FINANCE AND pLANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : G.p FOR LAND ACeUtSITION The Court made the following ORDER fH€ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.1904() of 2025 oRDER: This writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not depositing the compensation amounts to the petitioners as per order and decree of the Senior Civil Judge' Narayanpet in LAOP No'24 of 2Ol4 daLed l8'Ol'2023'

2.

The case of the Petltloners is that theY claim to be owners of rand developed into open ptots in Makthal Vinage and Mandal of Narayanpet District' On the requisition of the Executive Engineer, RBL-II' HW&C Division' Atmakur' an extent of land admeasuring Ac'3-10 gts'' in Sy'No'943 belonging to the petitioners herein were acquired for the purpose of excavation of gravity canal of Sangambanda Balancing Reservoir' An award was passed in Award No'123/2013 on 05' l2'2O13 awarding compensation of Rs'350/- per sq'yd' Questioning the said award LAOP No.24 of 2Ol4 was filed before the Senior Civil Judge' Narayanpet. The trial Court enhanced the compensation uide order and decree dated 1B'01' 2023' Thereafter' respondent No'4 fiIed LAAS No.57 of 2Ct23 befote this Court questioning the said LAOF. Accordingly, this Court in I'A'No'3 of 2023 granted stay I_ ..", of order and decree in LAOp No.24 of 20 14 dated 1g.O1.2023 subject to deposit of SO%, of the decreetal amount within g weeks. However, till date respondent authorities have not complied with the orders of this Court. euestioning the said inaction of the respondents, the present writ petition is filed.

3.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government pleader for Land Acquisition has placed a copy of instructions issued by Special Deputy Collector (LA), RLISP Unit-I, Makthal, Narayanpet District whereby it is stated that decreetal charges proposals for an amount of Rs.4,43,59,330/_ has b-een forwarded to District Collector, Narayanpet arrd inturn the sarne was forwarded to Chief Commissioner, Land Administration Office, Hyderabad for sanction. The Chief Commissioner has submitted the same to the Secretary, I&CAD, Hyderabad for sanction of G.o.Rt. a.d funds. It is submitted that soon after receiving the G.O.Rt and funds, the same will be deposited to the credit of LAOp.No.24 of 2014 and further stated that the whole process may take one month time.

4.

Recording ::3:: learned Assistant the submissions of Government Pleader for Land Acquisition' this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No'4/Special Deputy Collector (LA) to follow their own time line and deposit the decreetal amount to the credit of LAOP'No'24 of 2Ot4 within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed o{' Miscellaneous petitions, if anY, Pending in this writ petition shall stand closed' No costs' ,/TRUE COPY// SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI S STANT REGIS ECTION OFFICER To riat Buit eveloPment) erabad Secreta State of Tel angana at Hyde rabad.

1.

The Pri ncipaI Secretary, {lrrigation and Command Ar ding, Saifa bad, State of Telangana at 2 The PrinciP al Secreta rv, (Finance Department) Secre tari at Building, Saifabad, 3. The District Collector, NaraYa npet at NaraYanPet 4. The SPecial Deputy Collector (L'A )' RLISP Unit - I' Makthal Office 5. Two CCs to GP FO R IRRI AND COMM AREA DEVELOPMENT, High Court G, High Court for the State of NaraYanPet District erabad. [OUTI ND PLANNIN for the State 6. Two CCs to of Telangdna at HYd INANCE A GP FOR F erabad. IouTl Telang ana at Hvd OR LAND stoGPF Telangana at HYd erabad. IouTl

7.

Two CC

8.

One CC to SRI N 9. Two CD CoPies ACO UlSlTlON, High Court for the State of PRAVEE NRE DDY, Advocate [OPUC] SA PVL ,.---::--.:--\ --'. --.'t,:.\F. S ,. -..\- ":-.\ t',i 1 .'. \ 20 Sl:P zffi l1 .. ,/ ,7 _/ HIGH COURT DATED:14 tOBt2OZs ORDER WP.No.19040 of 2O2S DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments