High Court · 2025

Exclusive property Defendant No. 1 Son of D1 Nawabzada Laeequddin Khan Son of D1 Nawabzada Qutubuddin Khan To plaintiff items 2, 13, 14, 15 (as per the Decree) and also Fareed Villa. Sold from time to time as per Court order 8 and 24 sold with consent to .o2.r96t , t38 / 6r , 146/61 and 7O/62 on t9.1,1.1,962 26 items I 1 items 25 items* 50 items l item 1 item 8 items Item 27 Items 23) L't 254 of 'A' schedule l item tE'Sched,rle: 1 Cash and St:curities 2 Cash and St:curities 3 Cash anC St:curities I IC.' & NVSKJ Apph.at.o. lio :a8 of 2012 in Apphcatron No 5l I of2OO9 and APPh.ahan ,{o 24 oI2024 iJt/an,1 a.l No.7 ot 1958 (Inclusive of F schedule) were partitioned as per order inA lication 335 62 Lands iven on Nuzool Maktha lands) (not released by the Re'/enue Deparlment) As per para 4* s( c,f the Prelimina Decree Barracks at Jaha.numa (valued as per Court order 13. I 2.l96l lication No.335 of .962 A (Item No.4) several dt.tilding and land as Shamshat,ad Item 25 at Aurangabad (no records availabl No 6 Akbar Bagh, Toli Chowki, and 26 Bahdood Na Kunta (Agricultural Total in possession of subject matter of Tenants litigation with Revenue De artment Item 10 Moosa Ram Bagh possession taken over by Receiver r Items 1 to 4 and 11 and 12 Rs.12,60,733l- (in custody of Frnance Department, Governm ent of Andhra Pradesh. Item 5 to 9 of value of Rs.4,07,800 Nizam State Railway Sihares of Rs.78,000/- + Dividend 32O/- (handed ov.r to Receiver b Defendant No. 1 t 5 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.488 of 2O l2 jn Applicatlon No.5l9 of 2OO9 and Application No.24 of 2024 in/and c s.No-7 of I95a

4. The Commissioners / Receivers in their report in para 7 have categorically stated that 25 items of properties are Makta lands, which are subject matter of litigation in the Revenue Department. It is further stated as per para' a(g) of the preliminary decree, in case the said 25 items of properties are restored or released in favour of Asman Jahi Paigah, the L arrears of income, future income, compensation or sale proceeds derived from the said properties shall be distributed among defendants (2 to,22l in the proportion of 2.35 to each son and 1/35 to each daughter. It is also mentioned in the report that the said 25 items of properties have not yet been restored or released and that they cannot be valued or partitioned- The Commissioners / Receivers have attached a statement marked as 1/'. Therefore, the Commissioner-cum- Receivers could not file report about the release of items 23O to 254 of A' Scheduled which are in the custody of the Revenue Department.

5. Thereafter, a final report has been filed in the form of an affidavit dated 22.12.1969 in Application No.228 of 1969 in which prayer has been made to pass a final decree I 6 IJCJ & NVSKJ .Appl,.a ion 'io 18ts of 20l2 in Aptlicau.n N. j 9 of 2OO9 and AppLlcalon No 24 of 2024 rd and C 1l No 7 ol l95E in terms of I he Report, allotting the shares in iterns 1 to 229 only . 'l'hereafter an Application No'88 of 1970 was filed to r:lieve the Commissioners-cum--fieceivers from the Receivers;hi1t in view of the conclusion of the proct:edings" This Cou rt t -rereupon passed orders in Application No'228 of 1969 or 73.O2.797O accepting the Report of the Receiver; di-ecting the Registry to draw a final dr:cree in the suit anc. also passed orders discharging the lleceiver by an crde - dated 10.06.1971 in Application No'8.8 of t970.

6. It i s to be noted here that in para 1 (d ) of the Applicat on trled under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC and the memora:rdr.rm of compromise, the parties have der:lared as follows: "Para 1(d) "that as per the provisions cf Abolition of Jagir Regulation No.69 cf 1358 and (Jagir) Commutation Flegulation 25 of 1358 F, the commutation amount or Jagir iecome may be received bY each of the parties herein as heretofore, and their legal heirs under personal 1aw, the Defendant No.2 as Amir-e-Paigah receiving two-fifth and the Plaintiff t 7 HCJ & NVSKJ Appli.ation No 484 of 20 t2 in Applcation No 519 of 2OO9 d Applicarion No.24 of 2024 inland c s.No.7 of I9s8 and remaining Defendants receiving the remaining three-fifth."

7.ln para a(g) of the order dated 06.04. 1959, it is recorded that the Receiver cum Commissioners will have' power to sell the said properties by way of public auction and exercise all powers necessary lor affecting the division of the same between defendants Nos.2 to 12 and 14 to 22 each son getting 2133 and each daughter getting 1/33 share in the properties of schedule A' except items 230 to 254 of this schedule and the items of properties allotted to the plaintiff. That the defendants Nos.2 to 22 wlll get their share namely each son getting 2/35 and each daughter getting 1/35 from the arrears of income, future income, compensation or commutation or sale proceeds of the items 230 to 254 of schedule A'detailed under the head of "Makhtas", in case the same are restored or released in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi. In the Application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC for recording Memorandum of Compromise, the said para 4(S) have also been incorporated in the terms of compromise and the same had 8 ICJ & NVSKJ Apphcarron I',ro. 88 oa 20l2 rn Applcaho,r N(,519 ot2OO9 and Appli.a:rn1 ',lo 24 o12024 r./and C :iNo 7 of l95a become part i and parcel of the Memorand'rm of Compron.ise.

8. .\ I)ivision Bench of this Court by order dated- 2O.12.2O).2 has appointed Mr.Mohd. Bande Ali, Retired District Judee and Mr. K.Ajith Simha Rao, Retired District Judge, a; Fl:ceiver-cum-Commissioner for submission of report post Crawal of preliminary decree to ena ble the Court to drzL,v up the final decree. Thereafter, the ttew set of aforer;airl Receiver-cum-Commissioner have hled a report da tecl 06.07 .2023 to the effect of memora n dum of compromise'lnd preliminary decree.

9. ln :he said report they have concluded teat the entire 1it gation originated from the alleged erect.ition of Assignme nt Deeds and the orders passed thereon and would submit that the properties in Item Nos.232 t<' 254 of Schedule I.' of the preliminary decree have ncrt been restorecl or released in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi Resultan ly :he schemes of partition of the properties covered rrndrrr Item Nos.232 to 254 of Scheudle A'of the preliminary ,lecree in C.S. No.7 of 1958 preparr:d and 9 HCJ & NVSKI Applicarion No.488 of 2012 in Applicalion No.519 of 2OO9 and Apphcahon No 24 of2O24 in/ed C S.No.7 ol 1958 submitted by the Receiver-cum-Commissioner is of no help to the parties to claim any right or title and possession if any delivered to them under execution proceedings 1n respect of such properties by virtue of any ltnal decree' which came to be passed on the basis of Assignment Deeds and the consent of the Assignors.

10. Further, the properties covered by Items No.230 to 254 of Schedule 'A' detailed under the head of "Makhtas" were not partitioned as per para 1(d) and a(g) of the terms of compromise memo and as per para 1(d) and a(g) of the preliminar5r decree dated O6.04. 1959 and as per para 7 of the report dated 20. 12.1965 and Afhdavit dated

20.O9.1966 of Receivers-cum-Commissioners (Nawab Saleem Khan and Govindas Mehta) hled in Application No.205 oi 1965 and as per para 11 Afhdavit dated

22.12.1969 in Application No.22B of 1969 wherein it was submitted that the properties covered by Items No.23O to 254 of Schedule A' detailed under the head of "Makhtas" were not partitioned. The Receiver cum Commissioner further submit that in the absence of any relief of restoration in favour of the Paigah Asman Jahi, division of l0 HCJ & NVSKJ Appl,ca',oD 'lo r83 ol20l2,n pplLcatrcn N(i 5 9 of2OO9 and Applicarlon No 24 ol2024 ,n, a.d C rl No 7 of 1958 the respectivr: shares in the properties covered trnde:r Items No.23O to 2',54 of Schedule A', the plaintilf and the defenda n ls c annot make any claim or ownership of the suit proJ,erlies and has Iinally concluded that tL.e draft- final der)ree as per the order dated 13.O2.1')7O in Applicati,rn I o.228 of 1969 in the suit in respect of Items I to 229 of SctLedule A'and Schedules 'B','C','D', 'tr'and 'F' of prelirr inzLry decree to be engrossed on stamp papers giving a <1ui<:.us to the suit in C.S. No.7 of 1958

11. This Court on 07.O7.2023 noted that Mr. Mohd. Bande r\li and Mr. Ajithsimha Rao, Receivers-cum- Commiss ior.t:rs have submitted report and d j rect ed that the repo:t be furnished to the learned counsel for the parties e -rab)ing them to hle their objections to the report. Thereafte r, cbjections were hled, from time to tinre, and vide ord :r '7ated 26.07 .2024 , this Court direcl.ed the Registry .o li:;t the matter for final hearing Bri,:f fercts in Appl.No.488 of 2OL2: 12, Apl,lication No.488 of 2Ol2 has been filed seeking to direct the receiver-cum-commissioner to h:rndcver the l1 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.48E of20I2 rn Appli.anon No.5t9 ol2OO9 and Application No.24 of 2024 in/and C-S No.7 of 1956 possession of, land admeasuring Ac.l.25 guntas 1n schedule A and Ac. 1.30 guntas in schedule B, in Survey No.57 1/8/A of Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District to the applicants 1n Application- No.488 of 2Ol2 in view of the final decree dated 3O.12.20ll passed in Application No.519 of 2OO9 in C.S.No.7 of 1958

13. The applicants in Appl.No.488 of 2Ol2 submit that as per the preliminary decree, the vendors/predecessors in title were allotted the land in Sy.No.S7 of Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioners have purchased the application Schedule A' land to an extent of Ac. 1-25 gts., and application Schedule 'B' land admeasuring Ac. 1-3O gts., in Sy.No.57/1/8A of Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District which is in item No.252 of Schedule A annexed to the prelirninary decree dated

06.04.1959 from the legal representatives of defendant Nos.2 to 12 and 14 to 22 in the suit, who were impleaded as per the orders in Appl.No.73l2OOO d4ted O2.O2.2OOO through Document dated 06.01.2006. It is further submitted that this Court was pleased to pass hnal decree t2 LI( J & NVS(J ADDlLc.trnr N, rA oflut2 rn looric Lrron No - Lq t loo ) and ADDLcatrort N, .24 of 2024 ;;/anJCjtoTorle5s by an orcler dated 30' 12'201 1 and the same was engr:ossed on stamJr pap':r after payment of the required stanill duty lf the and the fin e ,1 decree was passed in favour ' petitioners . I t is further submitted that the posses:;ion of the prope rtlr covered under the linal decree has to be deliverecltoteefinaldecreeholdersbytheReceit't:rcum Commissicnt::..Therefore,thepetitionerspraythisCourt that the l{ect iver cum Commissioner be directed t I hand over the I ross 3ssion of the land to the petitioners and other decree holders Ertf-fa cts in Appl.No.2 4 of 2024: 14. App lication No'24 of 2024 has been filed to pass a frnal decr-ee .n favour of the petitioners herein in lerms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 29'12 2013 to an extent of Ac. l-32 gts., in Sy'No'57 of Shamshiguda Village' Balangar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District being item No 252 of Sche,lule A annexed to the preliminary dt'cree in C.S.No.7 of t958 which was allotted to defendant I'lo' 14 as per the scheme of partition submitted by the receivers- cum-cortmilisioners and approved as per the orders passed in ApplNo.+95/2009 in C.S'No'7/1958 and direct the I t3 I'CJ & NVSKJ Apph.ation No 488 of 2012 h Application No.5l9 oi 2009 and Application No 24 of 2024 idland c.s.No 7 ot lssa receiver-cum-commissioner to confirm the possession of the petitioners by handing over possession of the final decree schedule land to the petitioners.

15. In the aflidavit filed in support of Appiication No.24 of 2024, if is stated that some of the shareholders in the suit have executed Agreement of Sale cum General Power of Attorney dated 21,.07.2003 which was registered on 09.04.2013 in favour of petitioners and possession of land was handed over to the petitioners to an extent of Ac.1-37 gts., in Sy.No.57 of Shamshiguda Village. Later, as per the report of the Receiver-cum-Commissioner, the said land was fallen to the share of defendant No.14 and hence the said defendant who is one of the party to the Agreement of SaIe cum General Power of Attorney had agreed to' pass final decree uide Memorandum of Cornpromise dated 29.12.2013, in favour of petitioners to an extent of Ac.O-32 gts., and the petitioner may be declared as absolute owner of the schedule property i.e., Ac.9-32 gts., in Sy.No.57 of Shamshiguda Village, which was described and dealienated in the map attached to the compromise decree dated 29.12.2OL3, as such the present t1 IICJ & NVSKJ Appli.a:ior No 188 of 2012 rn Applicati.n N', 5.9 ot 2OO9 and AppLrcalron No 24 of 2024 rn anc C. i.No.7 of l95E application in App1.No.24 of 2024 was filed by the applicanl s for passing of final decree in respect of the land allotted -o c.efendant No.14 under Section 146 of Civil Procedur: Oode, 1908. The applicant also filed an application :or impleadment in the suit as the purchaser of the land elkrtted to defendant No.14 and sought for passing of final d,rcr.e in their favour in respect of land to an extent of Ac.O- ]2 gts., 1n Sy.No.57 of Shamshiguda Village, Balanaga r nrandal, Ranga Reddy District in tc rms of compromise lecree dated 29.12.2013.

16. The applicants in Application Nos.495 of 2008, 505 ancl 508 of 2013 have filed the objections to th,3 report submitte 1 byr the Commissioner dated 12.03.2019 and have sough'. rejection of the report. of the Commissioner. The app liczr rts in the aforesaid applications seek a direction to the receiver to abide by the report of the Commissione r dated 12.O3.2OO9 which was accepted by this Corrrt oo 17.O7.2OO9, in respect of the land sitrLated in Survey Nc.5?' of Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar llandal, Ranga Redd'y District and to confirm the final decree dated t, l5 Apptication No.4a8 oI2O l2 'n Application No.sr9 of 2OO9 and Application No-24 oI2024 in/andCSNo7of1958 30.12.2011 passed in Application No.519 of 2OO9 in favour IICJ & NVSKJ of the objectors/applicants

17. ln order to appreciate the grievance of the applicants in Application Nos.495 of 2008, 5O5 and 508 of 20 1 3, reference to relevant facts need mention which are stated infra. The subject matter of these applications is makthas bearing item Nos.23O lo 254 of Schedule A annexed to the preliminary decree situated Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. According to the applicants in the said applications, the aforesaid makthas were not taken over by the Government and were the personal property of Nawab Ali Janab Mir Kabir Mohammed Fakruddin Khan Bahadur. A civil suit namely C.S.No.7 of 1958 was hled seeking partition of properties of Asman Jahi Paigah. In the aforesaid civil suit, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties, a preliminary decree was passed on

06.04. 1959. The relevant extract of the preliminary decree is as under: "4(g). For the purpose of affecting the distribution of properties among the persons t6 ]CJ & NVSKJ Applr.ar-n 'Jt, r88 of 20l2 in Apd,.ati.n No; 9 ol2009 and Applrcalon No 24 of 2024 i./ and C I No 7 of l95a entr tle,l thereto the Commissioners / Recei"'e rs wi.li hzr',e powers to sell the said properties 1.ly puk lic auction and exercise ail pou/e rs nec 3ss€.ry for effecting the divisior, of the sale bet.ver:rr defendant Nos.2 to 12 and 14 to '.,12 eac 1 son getting 2 /33 and each daught,:r gett inpl 1 / 33 in the properties of Schedule A exc rpt items 23O to 254 of this Schedule arLd iter:rs :f properties allotted to the plaintiff. Tlre deft:ndzLnt Nos.2 to 22 wlll get their share, narrel-r', each son getting 2135 and ear.:h dat ght,:r i getting 1/ 35 from the arrears of incom,: future income, compensation rtr conrmrrtation or sale proceeds of the items 2lio to i54 rf Schedule A detailed under the head of "1\4z.ktl-ras" in case of the same are restored ,rr rele ase,l in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi."

18. Tht: subject matter of these applications pertain to land bezrring Survey No.57 of Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar }{andal, Ranga Reddy District, rvhich is included in A nnexure A annexed to the preliminary lecree. 1!). A l,ivision Bench of this Court by an ordt'r dated

15.10.20r)B lrassed in Application No.495 of 2OO9,.lirected the rece vel. cum-commissioner to submit a report by t7 HCJ & NVSKI AoDh.atton No 4aA ot 20l2 in ADolicarion No.5I9 of 2ooq and ADDlL@uon No 24 oI2024 i; /and c.S.No.7 or res3 dividing the land situated in Survey No 57 by metes and boundsbetweenthesharersaSpertheirentitlementsin the preliminary decree' The receiver-cum-commissloner this Court on 12'03'2009' A submitted rePort before Divisron Bench of this Court by an order dated 17 'O7 '2OO9 the objectors tn Thereafter, accepted the r rePort' application namelY of 2072 filed an of 2009 for Passing a fina1 decree' The on 30.12.2011,. ThereuPon' a final The relevant extract of the final decree Application No'488 Application No.519 same was allowed decree was drawn' reads as under: "That this Hon'ble court Passed a preliminary decree in partition Civil Suit C.S.No.7 of 1958 for division and distribution of private personal property of Asman Jahi Estate dated 6-4-1959' That Mrs' Shahabzadi Sulthan Jahan Begum, D/o Nawab Moinuddowlah Bahadur (Plaintiff in C'S'No'7 of 1958) filed a suit for paltition of the vast properties of Asman Jahi Paigah. That the properties land in survey Nos'1 to 57 to an extent of 326 acres situated at Shamshiguda Village' Balanagar Mandal' Ranga Reddy district being item No'252 in l8 HCJ & NVSKJ \pph.arl.n r.o 488 of20I2 in Applrarion N{ 519 of2OO9 and Apph{ arr')n No.24 oI2024 ,o/aDd l.S No.7 of 1954 Schedule-A of C.S.No.7 of 1958 are matn.rka prcperties of late Nawab Moinuddowtah Be.hac ur the properties were divided amon gst th: de fendant Nos.2 to 12 and 14 to 22 item Nc.2ii12 of the preliminary decree or r_he M:rtnr <a Properties of Nerv..ab Moinuddowlah Bahadur. The properties wrlre dividr:<l amongst the defendant Nos.2 to 12 and, 74 to it,2. l'hat as per the preliminary decree dared 6-,t-1959 in Civil Suit No.7 of t958 the delenrlant Nos. 2 to 12 and 14 to 22 each sor-l is . en'.itlr:rl to get 2/35rh share and each daught_er is ,:ntit led to get 1/35tr, share of the items 230 to 25zl of schedule A and as per the entitlenit,nt the lald to an extent of Ac. 1.25 guntas in Sclredr-rIe A and Ac.1.3O grntas of Schedule B, itern l\o. 252 of the Schedule the delenclant Nor;. 15,I2,74,8,t9,2O,2t and 22, Legal representatives of defendant Nos.3,4, 5,6,7,c), lO anr: i L under document dated: 06.O 1.2006 sold the lan,1 to the applicants. l'hat as per the directions of this Hon l_.le court, the Advocate Receiver(s) cur)_ Cortmir;sioner(s) was appointed and directed the Receiver(s) to submit a reporr by dividing the lan ls situated in survey No.57 by mett,s C n 19 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No 4aa of 20 l2 in Applcatron No.5l9 of 2OO9 and Applicatron N0.24 of 2024 in/aodCSNoTofl95a and bounds between the sharers as per their entitlement as per the preliminary decree the report of,advocate Receiver(s) along with the plan was accepted and approved by this court on 17.O7.2OO9. That the applicant herein submitted the documents before the Receiver(s) at the time of frling of the Report and requested them to allot the land to predecessors of title to an extent of Ac.3.15 guntas in survey No.57 of Shamshiguda and also stated that they are in possession and enjoyment of the land by virtue of the Registered deed of sale transaction the same was recorded in the Report, the division was made between the original sharers that the applicants herein have purchased the land to an extent of Ac.3.15 guntas in Shamshiguda Village and also entitled for passing of the final decree. 'That the applicants herein have purchased the land to an extent of Ac. 1.25 guntas in Schedule A and land to an extent of Ac. l.3O guntas in Schedule - B of Survey No. 57il/8 of Shamshiguda Village which is item No.252 of Schedule-A annexed to the preliminary decree dated 6-4- 1959 ' from the 20 ICJ & NVSKJ Applcar on No.. 88 of 20 l2 in Apptr.ahoi, No 51'l ol2OO9 d Appl.at,on l,lo 24 of 2024 ni/nn.l rl:l No 7 of l95a L.R:; c f the defendant under Registererd doc rment dated: 06.1.2006. That the predecessors .pf applicarrt ven,lors were allotted the land in survey No. 57 (par t), t he applicants herein are entitled to a finaI lecree in respect of the application sch:drLle A&B land to an extent of Ac. 1.25 arrd Ac. .3(l guntas in survey No.57 Shamshiguda Villige, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Redi y Disr rict. Thir; corrrt doth order and decree as lollows:- 'I'hat this application bc and hereby is 1. allo wed and a Iinal decree is passed for tlLe applica.rts for the application schedule land- 2. That the applicants be and hereby are ent rtle,l for final decree. a. to an extent of Ac. 1.25 guntas, Sr:hedule - A. in survey No.57/llB/A cf Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar lllandal, Ranga Reddy District. bounded by North: South: East: West: 60'wide Road Sy. No. 57 /1 part Sy. No. 57 l1 part Sy. No. 57 l1 parr r 2t HCJ & NVSKJ Apptication No.488 ot 20l2 in Appl,carioD No.519 oI2OO9 and Applicatron No.24 oa 2024 inlandCSNo7ofl9s8 b. , to an extent of Schedule-B land admeasuring Ac. l.3O guntas in Survey No. 57/1/8 of Shamshiguda Village, Batanagar Manca_l; Ranga Reddy District bounded by i North: So'wide Road South: Survey No 57/ 1 part East: Survey No. 57/ I part West: Survey No. 57/ 1 part that a fee of Advocate (s) - Receiver (s)- 3. cum-Commissioner(s) is fixed at 2oh of the basic Value depicted in the basic value Register, which shall be payable at the time of delivery possession.

4. that the final decree be engrossed on the requisite stamp papers as per the boundaries, and the frnal decree be issued after engrossed of stamp papers. Note: In pursuance of the order of the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. vide order dated: 3O.12.2011 in Appln No. 519 of 2OO9 in C.S No. 7/58 the requisite Stamp duty of Rs. 81000/- is to be paid and the same was paid by way of Stamp Papers (20 X lOO) valued at Rs. 2,00O/- for the purpose of engrossment of final decree and an 22 ICJ & NVSKJ ,{ppLicaI.on ilo i88 oI2Ol2 In Applicalron N(,5 9 ot 2009 and .\pplicarrrn No 24 oI2024 nr/.ndC INo7oll95a am{)un1. of Rs.58,750/- dated: 09.O2.2012 atrd Rs. 2(t,250/-dated: 15.02.2012 was depositr:d in the account of Registrar (Judicial), High CorLrt cf A.P. in Alc No. 52005821812 in S B rl Hrge C)ourt Branch, Hyderabad."

20. The final decree holders have deposit ed the required starap'duty and the final decree was engrossed on the stanrp paper. The final decree was regist,,:red AS document bearing No.13236 of 2014, dated 3i.10,2014, by the Joint Sub Registrar, Ranga Reddy District

21. A [tivision Bench of this Court by an ordr:r dated O2.OI.2O23 passed in Application No.9277 of 2077 and batch ap roir-. ted new recelver-cum-commrssloner tc submit a detaile,l report on the basis of which a final decree may be drawn. In pursuance of the aforesaid orcler, the recelver-()urA -commissioner has submitted a reyrort on

06.O7.2O23. The commissioner recorded their cor-rr:lusions in paragrapn 98 to 101.2 which are extracted belov. for the facility o1 relt:rence: "98. In the facts and circumstances mentioncd in t he loregoing paras, it becomes abundant Iy anc evidently clear that, the entire litigatir. n t 23 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No 4aa of 2012 in AppLcation No 5I9 of 2OO9 dd Applicarion No 24 of 2024 in/and C S No.7 of 1958 originated from the alleged execution of Assignment Deeds and the orders passbd thereon would not and should not empower the parties who litigated the cause tracing their title to the alleged execution of Assignment Deeds- I am therefore led to the irresistible conclusion that the result of such litigation gets vitiated by reason of the admitted incompetency and powerlessness of the plaintiff and defendants in CS.No.7 of 1958 to deal with Item Nos.232 to 254 of Schedule 'A' of the Preliminary Decree in CS.No.7 of 1958 to deal with the properties covered under Item Nos. 232 to 254 of Schedule 'A' of the Preliminary Decree since the said properties have not admittedly been restored or released in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi.

99. Resultantly the schemes of partition of the properties covered under Item.Nos. 232 to 254 of Sqhedule 'A' of the Preliminary Decree in CS.No.7 of 1958 prepared and submitted by the Receiver-cum- Commissioner is of no help to the parties to claim any right or title and possession if any delivered to them under execution proceedings in respect of such properties by virtue of any final decree which came to be passed on the basis of Assignment Deeds and the consent of the Assigners. 24 L]CJ & NVSKI AppLcat on rio.:8s of 2012 in Applicalo,r No 5l I of2l)09 and Appl:.atron !o 24 of 2024 rn/and I l:.No 7 ol 1958 10C . ]':re net result is that the order date d la)..1.197O in Application No.22B of 19t'9 acc :pting the report of Repeivers cural Crrr rmi,;sioners dated 20 9-1969 filed rn ApJlic,ation No.2O5 of 1965 and directing the Rt-'gistrlr to draw Final Decree in the suit is final anc thz.t there cannot be any more hnal decret:s in the suit in CS No.7 of 1958 and final decrees pas serl thereon shall not vest the parties wit.h an) ril1ht and interest over the propertrr:s cov rrec by Items 23O to 254 of Schedule 'A' dr:t rile <[ under the head of "Makhtas" for t]rc foll,rwirLg reasons at the cost of reiteration: - a. "hat the properties covered by Items 230 to 25t ol' Schedule 'A' detailed under the heacl of "Mz,khtas" were not and have not been releasr:d ol r esl ored in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi; b. 'lhal the properties covered by Items 230 to 25. oi Scheduie 'A' detailed under the head of "Mzrkhtas" were not partitioned as per para 1(d) alx. 4ltJ of the terms of compromise memo arLd as per- para 1(d) and a($ of the preliminary decree dated 06.04.1959 and as per para 7 of the report dated 20.12.1965 and Afhdavit datr:d 20.)9.1966 of Receivers-cum-Commissioners 25 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No 4aa of 2012 rD Application No 5t9 of 2OO9 and Applcatron No 24 ot2024 in/and C.S No 7 of l9s8 (Nawab Saleem Khan and Govindas Mehta) filed in Application No.205/ 1965 and as per para'1 1 Aflrdavit r dated 22.L2.L969 in Application No.22a/t969; c. That in.the absence of any order of release or restoration of the said properties in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi, and in the absence of any order of the Court for the division and allotment of respective share in the properties covered by Items 230 to 254 of Schedule 'A' detailed under the head of "Makhtas" plaintiff and defendants cannot make and could not have made any claim of ownership over the said properties since they were not vested with any right, title and possession enabling them to execute assignment deeds in favour o1 3ra parties; and thereby allowing the 3'd parties to create fuss and waste the precious time of the Hon'ble Courts. 1O1. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the Registry has to be directed to draft final decree as per the order dated 13.02.197O in Application No.228 of 1969 in the suit in respect of Items 1 to 229 of Schedule 'A' and Schedules 'B' 'C' 'D' 'E' & 'F' of preliminary decree and to engross the same on stamp 26 |ICJ & NVSKJ Apphcalon N..l8E ot 2012 rn Applicatror No 5l I ot2OO9 and Appl,carirn {o 24 o12024 rn/and I r' No 7 o1195& papers and thereby giving a quietus to the suit in ( S.No.7 of 1958.

101.2 l'he Plaintiff and Defendar-rts/their Legrel Rt:p res.rrntatives in case of death of any of tLLe par.ies, cannot file any application in CS.No.7 ,lf 1!)58 in respect of Items 23O to 254 of Schedule 'A leta iled under the head of "Makhtas' and tha. th:y have to lay their claim if any before the corrrpetent authority. " Therea{ter, the matter was adjourned for rerceiving objection; on the report of the Receiver cum Commissioner dated 06 07.12023.

22. OBJI'CTTONS TO THE REPORT DATED 06.07.2023.. (i) r'he final decree holders in Application No.839 of 2013 hare li.ed objections stating that in a partition suit, the dul.y of the Receiver is to divide the suit s<:hedule propertle; trr:tween the sharers in accordance u'ith the share/sharers hxed in the preliminary decree. It is also stated that trere is no warrant to the Receiver entrusting or suggesting the works to the Receiver and he himself filed the pres:nt report by stating that the lands aLre not available fo: partition without veri$ring the subs;equent 27 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No-488 of 20 l2 in Application No.519 of 2009 and Applrcatron No 24 or 2024 inland C S.No.7 of 1958 orders and the proceedings and also the memos issued by the concerned CCLA. The Objector reiterated the submissions made in the affidavit and further stated that all the proceedings and orders were not taken into- consideration by the Receiver as such the report is liable to be quashed on the following grounds: (a) That powers of Receiver in a partition suit is only to divide the suit schedule properties between the sharers fixed in the preliminary decree but in the present case. the receiver went beyond the jurisdiction and hled report stating that the lands are not available for partition. (b) The judicial orders passed by this Court and the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court cannot be nullilied or modified by the report of the Receiver and hence the present report is liable to be discarded. (ii) Mohammed Sarshar Ahmed, learned counsel has frled objections to the report of the Receiver cum Commissioner on behalf of defendant No.21 in C.S.No.7 of 1958 i.e., respondent No.21 in App1.No.24 of 2024. Tl:,e main objections are that the report is based on wrong compromise and that the report would unsettle the things 1a lCJ & NVSKJ Applicarron No r88 of 2012 iD Apphcation N*o 5 9 ot2OO9 and ApplicailoD No.24 of 2024 ro/ and C. r.No.7 of i95a which have historical signihcance and no proper research was dorre ar-rd the report erroneously discussed as to how the right'; in a compromise decree gets. transmittecl to the assignees arr,1 in the partition suit no title can be gone into.' [Comments: 'fhe applicants haue not specifically stated in their ob-ie:tict, rs as /o hou their ights uould be defeated.l (iii) O b jections were also filed on behalf of legal represenlatives of defendant Nos.2 to 12 and 14 to 22 in the prelirninzLry decree in C.S.No.7 of 1958 to the r,:port of Receiver cunr Commissioner. The objectors contend that the Rece ver- cum Commissioner went beyond jurir;diction and hled thc report stating that the lands are not a vailable for partition and that the receiver has also not tal<en the subsequr nt orders passed in the .suit or the s1.atutory authoritit:s rr.ed the proceedings issued by the CCLA stating that they have not taken over the subject lands anrl hence the quest ior, of release does not arise. It is also stal.ed that it is just anrl nsss5s2ry to set aside the report and declare the suit schedule property in item Nos.230 to 254 are available for partition and to direct the Receiver cum 29 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No 488 ot20l2 in Application No 519 oa 2oo9 ard Applicanon No.24 oI 2024 in/md C.S No 7 ot l95a- Commissioner to file the metes and bounds division report so as to enable the parties to file final decree applications. (iv) Similarly, objections were filed to the report of- Receiver cum Commissioner by the final decree holders in Appl-No.5l9 of 2OO9. The objectors would submit that as per preliminary decree dated 06.04.1959 in C.S.No.7 of 1958, the lands situated at Shamshiguda Village in schedule 'A' (item No.252) are self purchased. by predecessors of Nawab Moin-ud-dowla Bahadur under registered sale deed dated 27th Jamad-us-Sani 1221 Hilti whose name was recorded in the possessor and pattadar columns in Khasra Pahani for the year 1954-55 and accordingly taxes are paid in respect of the lands in Shamshiguda Village. However, proceedings are pending before the Board of Revenue at the time of entering into compromise and at the time of passing of preliminary decree, the compromise decree was passed subject to release by Board of Revenue and in view of the orders dated 74.12.1959 passed by Board of, Revenue, the Shamshiguda Village was found to be private patta and these makthas were never taken over by the Government i0 ICJ & NVSXJ AppLi.at,od No..r88 of 2ol2 ir AppLrcat o,i No 5I ) or 2OO9 and Applcalon l,lo 24 oI2024 rn/and C.S No.7 ot l95a and the saiC Iands are available for partition and the final decree pz,ss,: C earlier may be confirmed in favoui of the frnal decr:e bolders (v) S;imitarly, objections were frled by defendant Nos.2 to 12 anc ltl to 22 in the preliminary decree in C.S No.7 of 1958 to t he report of Receiver cum Commissioner stating that the rnalt:rial facts of the case on record were not at all dealt by thr: Receiver cum Commissioner to g;ive an unbiased reoort which should help the Court to colne to a proper decision based on facts and legality (vi) Ihe objections frled by defendant Nos.2 to 12 and 14 to 22 rn ttLe preliminary decree in C.S.No.7 of 19;i8 were adopted :y third party impleaders in Review Petition in I.A.No. I (f ttt)2o and LA.No.3 /2O2O io L.P.A.No.1 r.rf 2018 and C.A.llo.i)3 of 2017 in C.S.No.7 of 1958

23. SUPPORTING SUBMISSIONS TO THE REPORT DATED 06.0'7.2023 An rpJr ication in I.A.No.l of 2025 has been tiled by the petitirrners/applicants in Application Nos. 1 of 2O2l arrd 5 of 2O2t) ir Application No.837 of 2013 in C.S.'rlo.7 of 3l HCJ & NVSKJ ApplicaLion No-488 ot 2012 iD Application No 5i9 of2oo9 and Application No 24 of 2024 in/and c.s No 7 of 1956

1958. The said application was hled in support of the report of Receiver cum Commissioner by stating that the report of the Receiver cum Commissioner has brought true facts and the fraudulent methods applied by the persons' who claimed the lands mentioned in Schedule A' of the Preliminary decree granted in C.S.No.7 of 1958 when these lands mentioned from 23O to 254 were specifically prohibited from partition as per a(g) of the preliminary decree granted in C.S.No.7 of 1958. It is further stated.that paragraph No.5 of the report of Receiver cum Commissioner , clearly brought out the facts that two Receiver cum Commissioners who were appointed during the proceedings of C.S.No.7 of 1958 stated that Maktas mentioned in Schedule A' from 230 to 254 were under litigation with the Revenue Departm'ent as per para 4(g) of the preliminary decree of the report. It is further submitted that if the properties mentioned at Sl.Nos.23O to 254 are restored.or released, the arrears of income, future income, compensation or sale proceeds derived from the said properties shall be distributed among defendant Nos.2 to 22 in the proportion of 2/35 to each son and 1/35 to each ,- {CJ & NVSU Appl,car,o. No..l88 of 2ol2 in Appir(atron Nt) 51') of2OO9 and Appl..atiL)n I{o.24 of 2024 rn/and ,l :l No.7 ot 1954 daughter and that the said 25 items of properties have not been restorecl or released and that they cannot be valued or partr.trone,l at this stage. As such. the Receivt:r cum Commiss oner could not hle report about the release of- item Nos.23 li to 254 of 'A' Schedule which are in the custody cf Rtvenue Department. Eventually it is sullmitted that if tht: la.nds in Shamshiguda Land was not released in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi, no partition decree can be passed orr tLx: said land. SUEIMI.'iSIONS: 24. Mr'.Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Oounsel representing Mr.N.M.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the applicant in rlpplication No.4B8 of 2OL2 has submrtted that the entire iss:e revolves around the prehminary decree and the propertir:r; are private properties of Asman Jahi Paigah. The saic p :operties are under the control o1- Jagir Administ: atic,n. However, it is not necessary to adduce any documen-s. He would submit that subsequently the propertier; hz,ve been resumed and they are avail:Lble for partition. Ttre learned Senior Counsel would subnrit that the final Cet:r'ee has already been passed in favour of the objectors in ,\pplication No.4B8 of 2072. In pursuance of 33 HCJ & NVSK] Apptication No.4Aa of 20I2 tn Application No.5I9 of 2009 and Applicadon No.24 of 2024 i./and C.S.No.7 ot l9s8 the final decree dated 3O.|2.2OL I passed in Application No.519 of 2OO9 in C.S.No.7 of 1958, the receiver-cum- commissioner be directed to handover possession of the land admeasuring Ac. 1.25 guntas in schedule A and- Ac.1.3O guntas in schedule B, in Survey No.57 1/8/A of Shamshiguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under Order XXI Rule 35 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19O8. Per contra, the receiver- cum-commissioner would submit that these properties.are not available for partition and no proof of document in support of paragraph a(g) of the preliminary decree is frled to show that the aforesaid properties have been released and that these applications are frled after 40 years.

25. Mr.Vedula Venkat Ramana, learned Senior Counsel foi the applicants in Application Nos.495 of 2OO8, 505 and 508 of 2013 would submit that the receiver is appointed under Order XX Rule 18 of CPC for division of the property covered by the preliminary decree by metes and bounds. It is contended that the receiver neither discharges any judicial power nor any adjudicatory power. It is argued that receiver cannot submit a report whether a 34 *'"T;; :)Jlil iilii".l"ilx rn/rnd,j j No.7 ot 1958 particulal item is available for partition. The receiver is :tCJ & NVSKJ Afpl,.ar,o. \o ,i8a ot 2012 tn requirecl :o ,s ubmit a scheme of partition. It is submitted that bv srrlrmitting a report dated 06.07.2023, the Receivers / C,rmmissioners have exceeded the scope of their' appointm en1 and have submitted their opinions. In this connection rr ference has been made to paragraphs 98 and 99 of the report submitted by the receivers. It is urg,ed that the repr:rt of the commissioner amounts to revieu, of the prelimina ry rlecree without issuing notice to any of . .the parties. [t is also submitted that the report subrnitted by the Conrrrissioners dated 06.07.2023 has to be rejected. It is for th,: 51 ate Government to point out the pr ovision underrvtLictr the property is required to be released and whether the same has been released. It is contended that the conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it cannot be r:onferred with the consent of the partics. It is therefore pra'/ed that this receivers be directed to abide by the reporl ah'eady filed, which has been accepted by this Court ir-r resl)ect of the land situated in Survey No.57 of Shamshi5uda Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and confirm the final decree clated 30 1,2.2011 35 HCJ & NVSKJ Applicaiion No 488 of 2012 ir Applicahon No 519 ot 2OO9 and Application No.24 of 2024 inlandcsNo7of1958 passed in Application No.519 of 2OO9 in favour of the objectors. It is contended that the report submitted by the receiver cum commissioner be rejected and liberty be granted to final decree holders to take recourse to such' remedies as are available to them in law for seeking possession. Our attention has also been invited to order dated 30.12.1977 passed in Fite No.NA2/284/77 by tlre Commissioner of Survey Settlement - Inam and it has been contended that lands mentioned in item Nos.230 to,254 have been released. In support of the aforesaid submissions, reliance has been placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in Jagmittar Sain Bhagat v. Director, Health Services, Haryanar.

26. Mr.Sunil B.Ganu, learned Senior Counsel for respondent Nos. 116 and 128 in Application No.24 of 2024 has adopted the submissions made by Mr. Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel for the applicants in Application Nos.495 of 2OO8 and 505 and 508 of 2013. He would submit that the receiver cum commissioner appointed by this Court has not taken into account the order daLed 30-12.1977 passed by the Commissioner of Survey Settlement - Inam ' (zou) to scc r:o 36 IICJ & NVSKJ AppLicairon ll. r88 ol 2012 iD AprrlLcaiiod N, 5.9 of 2009 add Apptr.at o. No 24 of 2024 ,i anc C l.No 7 oI 1958 and th.e -efore,. the aforesaid report does not deserve acceptan re. Mr.J.Prabhakar, learned Senior Courtsel for the appli:ant in Application No.24 of 2024 has adotrted the submissi:n:; made by Mr. Vedula Venkataramana, learned- Senior Coun:;el for the applicants in Application Nor;.495 of 2008 anrl 5C,5rand 508 of 2O13. Mr.A.Venkatesh. learned Senior rlounsel for respondent Nos.12 and 21 in Applicati rn llo.24 of 2024 and for final decree holders in application NIo.14O9 of 2003 has adopted the subnrisqions made b', Mr. ; Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel lor r.he applicants in Application Nos.495 of 2008 and 505 arrd 508 of 2O13. Learned counsel for the objectors /final , decree holders 1n application No.439 of 20 13 ha C ,rlso adopted the submissions made by Mr Vedula Venl:ataramana, learned Sdnior Counsel for the applicants irr Application Nos.495 of 2OO8 and 505 and 508 of 201i1. Mr.Naga Srinivas Rao, learned cour-rsel for respondent lt'os.1 to 11, 13 to 20,22 to 258 in 1.A,1tro.9227 of 2Ol4 (..A.I,1o.24 of 2Ol4l submitted that all final decrees have bee-r ctrtained by playing fraud. It is contended that the lands nrentioned in item Nos.232 to 254 of the 37 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.48a of 20 l2 in Applcarion No.5l9 ol2009 ed Applrcahon No.24 of 2024 in/and C.S No 7 of 1958 preliminary decree have not been released and the same are not covered under the preliminary decree and by efflux of time no rights are created. Therefore, the receiver cum commissioner cannot assign the aforesaid lands in favour- of any party. In support of his submissions, reliance has been placed onl a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in S.Tirupathi Rao vs. M.Lingamaiah2. Mr.T.K.Sridhar, , learned counsel for representatives, of defendant No.4 in the suit and. . for respondent No.4 in application No.24 of 2024 submitted that the report dated 06.09.2023 submitted by the receiver cum commissioner in so far as it pertains to lands 1 mentioned in S1. Nos.232 to 254 is required to be rejected. Learned counsel further submitted that the receiver cum commissioner appointed by this Court ought to have appreciated that the hnal decree cannot be passed in application Nos.1409 of 2013 and 837 of 2O13 as the unregistered assignment deeds were executed and a title in respect of the immovable property cannot be passed on the basis of the unregistered document. Therefore, the 2 2018 SCC OnLi.," Hyd 284:2018 (5) ALT 645 (DB) +L ,6 I]C] & NVSU APPLicarion l{t) +tlu ot 2012 iu APplication N., s I ol2OO9 ard Applicar on No 24 of 2024 ,n, an,l c j No.7 or 1958 applicati('n sreeking final decree at the instance of the I applicarrts application Nos.1409 of 2013 and 837 of 2013 is rot nlaintainable and it is also pointed out -hat the receiver currr commissioner has cursorily prepa.-ed the- report ar'd cught to have examined the issue in greater detail as thr-' Government is in possession of somt: of the lands cor ererl under the preliminary decree

27. Mr.Imran Khan, learned Additional Advocate General. z,ppearing on behalf of the State would subrnit that all the 1a nds are vested in the State on account ,rf Jagir Abolition Act ald State is not a party to the comlrromise and wou.d refer to clause a(g) of the preliminarl' decree dated 0(i.O,1.1959 from which it is evident Lhat the defenda.n t N rs.2 to 22 have been heid entitled to the propertie; nr:ntioned at item Nos.23O to 254 of S,:hedule A'annex:d tr the preliminary decree, in case the s;tme are restorecl or r eleased in favour of Asman Jahi Paiglah- He would fu-th,:r submit that in the instant case, adnrittedly, there is no material to indicate that the prrtperties mentionel zLt. serial No.23O to 254 of Schedule A'to the preliminary Cecree have been restored or released it.. favour !& 39 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.488 ot 20l2 rn Appticauon No 519 of2009 and Applicalron No 24 of 2024 m/and C.S.No.7 of 1958 of Asman Jahi Paigah and would submit that there was no formal release r order and in view of the same, the compromise decree cannot be a foundation for further adjudication. He would further refer to the orders passed' by the Commissioner of Survey dated 14.12.1959. The said judgment arises'against File No.A2/ 147 l2016 pertaining to 29 self acquired properties and in the said judgment, Commissioner of Survey Settlement - Inam in respect of villages mentioned as 16 makthas i.e., Bahadur Ali.had allowed any other semblance of applicability in respect of self acquired villages and the same has been restored back to Paigah Azam rindicated in the order. karned Additional t' Advocate General would further submit that the said proceedings are incorrect and the said order is not marked and even in the said order no details of the villages are given and the said documents were not marked and no evidence was led to that effect. He would further submit that as far as Shamshiguda Village 1S concerned, Government is in possession and even subsequent to the order of release, no entries have been made in the revenue records and the applicants have no locus to file objections 40 .ICJ & NVSKJ Applicat,on \. ' It8 ot 20l2 in Applicatron No 51 1 ot 2OO9 and Apptlcarron i,lo.24 of 2024 n/rnd l::No.7 of lgsa and the rrssiilnment deeds cannot be looked into and do not have env weightage and supports the report of Fleceiver cum Corr.missioner dated 06.07-2023. Learoed Adiitional Advocate Gt:nera1 would further submit the judgrnent of' the Divisron Ilench in O.S.A.Nos.58 to 66, 68 to 72 of 2OO2 and O.S..,\(SF.).Nos.235, 2A8, 237, 2a4, 239, 227, 21 4, 2r8, 222,243,5; 14, 518 and 522 of 2003 dated 10O62003 supports tht: report of the Receiver cum Commissiot'rer' The relevani pot'tion of the said judgment is er<tracted hereundrr for better understanding and appreciation of the CASC: "The assignment deeds, prima facie ir-r our considered opinion are inadmissible i.r evidence for the reason that the cccuments are hit by Section 17 of the Fk:gistration Act. The right title and irterest in immovable properties specified ir the assignment deeds are sought to be tr.rnslerred in lavour ofthe assignees. In another clause in one of the . s signment deeds dated 16.O9.2000 it is ci( clared "that the assignors have doth ILrrreby assign and transfer their rights, i-llerest and lille acquired by lhem irr respect of schedule mentioned property r:rcrefully described in the schedule of the 4t HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.488 of 2012 rn Appli.ation No 519 of 2oo9 and Applcation No 24 of2O24 rn/andcSNoTorl95a property and the assignment deed is to be read in consonance with memo of understanding entered separately for this purpose". The said memorandum of underslanding is not made pdrt of the record. Such covenants mutually agreed between the parties cannot, in any manner, whatsoever take away or adversely effect the right, title and interest of third parties. The cases on hand, in our considered opinion, require a thorough for which purpose Jagir Administrator and Secretary. Finance Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh who were earlier parties in C.S No.7 of 1958 are required to be impleaded... The District Coilector, Ranga Reddy District and ias well as the District Collector, Hyderabad are also required to be impleaded inasmuch as many of the localities and villages situated in these districts are sought to be included for the 'first time after 40 years into the compromise decree dated O6.04.1959. This has resulted in causing any amount of prejudice adversely affecting the rights of the individuals in possession and the orders virtually carne as a bolt from in a blue as far as they are concerned. In our considered opinion, this is not a case where any of the parties can be permitted to be represented by general $ 42 IICJ & NVSKJ ApplicatioD li. u 88 of2OI2 tn Apphcatior' No 51r) of2OO9 and App|car.. Io 24 ot 2024 in/trnd il I No 7 of 1958 po'ver of attorney holder without making proper enquiry into the genuineness of the gcneral power of attorney deeds. We have n,r -iced as to how and in what- manner crrr tain interpolations are made in the ap rlications and parties are added after fi.ieg the applications into the Court. Since we propose to set aside th<r or-rlers passed by the learned single Judge a-rC remit the matter for recording evidence, rve do not propose to record any further hndings. Whatever we have noticed leaves us not only with an unpleasant feeling but we are shocked to realise the depth ancl nL:rgnitude of misrepresentations ancl rrr:Lnipulations that are apparent even to a naked eye. We must observe that we are not irnpressed by the submissions made b1, the It':.rned senior counsel appearing on behalf o[ respondents 102 and 103 in O.S.A Nos. 64, 65 and 66 of 2OO2 that the only remedy aveilable to the appellants herein is to get th,:ir claims adjudicated by filing necessar]' applications under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC s rLce a preliminary decree had already been passed by this Court in terms of c'l lpromise. Even orders have been pTssed by this Court to accept lhe report o[ tlr,r Commissioners/ Receivers ancl a.:,:ordingly orders have been passed for 43 HCJ & NVSKJ ApplL.atLon No.488 ot 2012 in Apptrcatron No 5tq ot 2009 and ApPbcation No 24 oI2024 in/and C.S No 7 of 1958- - Thi s Court is preparation of final decree seized of the whole of the proceed inss tn either case Whether a final decree has been PASS ed or not. (Underlining is bY me for drawing attention) Even if such aPPlications are required to be frled under C)rder 21 Rule 97 CPC they have to be hled only in this Court' There cannot be any dispute with the proposition of law in view of the authoritative pronouncement of Supreme Court. But in the instant case each of the applications filed in the Court are integrally connected with each other' We have already seen the grand design and the scheme prepared to get villages after villages, included in the preliminary decree passed about more than 4O years ago We have also seen the nature of the assignment deeds and the parties thereto and the nature of dispute with regard to signatures on the said documents' We have also 'found that the copies of the general power of attorney d.eeds are not hled into the Court. It is not clear from the record as to who were the parties that were present before the Court. In none of the applications the decree holders and the legal representatives have frled any vakalat authorising any advocate to represint in the proceedings. Even without ordering any notice some advocate without any I 44 I ICJ & I{VSKJ Appl'catiJn \r r3a ot 2012 in Applrcatio,, No -l I ol2009 and AppLcattrrn '1o.24 of 2024 h/,ind r) ! No.7 ot I954. v.i}:alat represented the parties in the pr(,ceedings. The whole thing is shrouded in mystery and the proceedings themselves are conceived in sin. single learned Various contentions have also been ur11ed by the learned counsel for the a14re11ants attacking the order passed by th€ Judge. ln view of our considered opinion that the matter requires a further enquiry for which prl pose both documentary, and oral e',ilence is required to be recordedr we are nol inclined to go into those contentions. Tlrr: questions are left open. For the aforesaid reasons, the inqrugned orders are set aside. The matter is:-emitted to the learned single Judge for disposal in accordance with law for wl-rich pujpose evidence is to be recorded: The puLr ties are accordingly permitted to lead srrt h evidence as they may consider it ne('essary. In support of their clarm. "

28. vlr.\/edula Venkatramana, learned senior counsel would furth€ r submit that subsequent to the preli.rrinary decree, repotls were accepted and third parties have filed applicatio rs e.nd receivers were appointed and partitioned the propetties which are not been covered in the part_ of the l, 45 HCJ & NVS(J Applicatron No 488 of 20l2 in Applicanon No 519 ot 2OOq dd ApPli.atron No.24 ot 2024 m/md c.S.No.7 of 19s8 receivers report and the entire report is based on information gathered from the third party letters and the receivers cannot disturb the frnal decreeg' He would further submit that the receiver believed the information from the' third parties to be true and the entire report appears to be in the form of a judgment. I I

29. MohdlBande Ali, Receiver cum Commissioner' per contra, would submit that subsequent to the release order of the Commissioner of Survey Settlement and Inam conlirming the release of the 29 Maktha Villages in favour of Moinuddowla Bahadur i'e', to the sharers in C'S'No'7 of 1958 by allowing the appeal filed by the legal heir of Moinuddowla i Bahadur against the orders dated 29.12.1976 disallowing the claim 'for 16 villages dated 30.12.1977 , no document has been filed to the extent of release order pertaining to the properties mentioned in Schedule A' in item Nos'23O to 254 and in case of such release, petitioners have to hle an application for passing of fresh preliminary decree and the subject documents need to be marked as per Indian Evidence Act' 1872' He would furthercontendthatthirdpartiescannotapproachfor { 46 ICJ & NVSKJ Appli.ar,on lJo r8{t of2012 in Appiicat,on No 5 9 ot2OO9 aod Applicar,on No.24 of 2024 irt/and C .r No 7 ol 1958 passing f .nal decree and a fresh preliminarl, decret: has to be passe<l and Government has to be made a partv to the extent of iterrn, Nos.23O to 254 of Schedule A, pr.opert5r. Even othenvise, as per the release order ol Board of- Revenue, it ir; not clear insofar as to the extent oj- list of properties mentioned in item Nos.23O to 254

30. Mr.Sunil B Ganu, learned senior <,ounsel appearing o:r behalf of respondent Nos.l8 ancl 126 in Appl.No.2I c,l 2O24 has hled additional objections to the report da -ed 06.07 .2023 stating that on culminar_ion of Inam and su,::ession enquiry instituted by the Govet.nment Iraigah Asman Jahi, the office c,f the concernin l Commissioner of Survey, Settlement and Land Records (CSSLR) tad issued Muntakhab No.3 on 14.02.1983 as confirmed in I)roceedings Reference No.NA2/ 147 /69 dated, t 1 .06. 198 i 5living the list of all the villages whi<:h are vested in the (iovernment. Admittedly Shamshiguda is not included irr the said list. The said fact that Shams}.Liguda being exchrdec from Muntakhab No.3 is also confirrrLed by the GoverrLme;rt of Telangana uide Comrnunication dated 25.77.202, wLerein it was mentioned that appeal filed bv 47 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.488 of 20l2 in Application No s19 of2oo9 dd Applicatioo No 24 ot 2024 inland c.S.No.7 of 19s8. legal heirs of Paigah Asman Jahi was partially upheld by the Board of Revenue In F.No.NA2/ 147 /69 dated 29.12.1976 and the said proceedings wquld establish that the property does not form part of Atiyat grants, as it is a- non-jagir/ private land. Learned senior counsel would further submit that land in Sy.No.57 of Shamshiguda Village to an extent of Ac.92-22 gts., has also been mutated in favour of ' respondent Nos.118 and 726 by the Government by issuing proceedings dated 12 'O4 '2023 ' and

13.04.2023 respectively. In case of any doubt about the enforceability of the documents, respondent Nos' 1 18 and 126 are read.y to lead evidence in accordance with law'

31. We have considered the submissions made on both sides and have pemsed the record.

32. The followins ooints falls for consideration: 1) What would be the effect and implication of order dated 30.12.1977 passed by the Commissioner of Survey Settlement - Inam in the present case? 48 Applrcarrcn h:J & NVSKJ -r'8 oI 20 t2 rn ^"'"'^';ii Ii;' i.",?1?', 8il lnlaad C.S ',lo 7 of 1958 ^_,- 2l Wha t rt ould be the effect of the previous report submitted b.r the receiver cum commissioner, whit:h has : been acce rted by this Court?. 3) Whe the r the report of the present recel\,e r cum - commissioner ban be rejected IN respect of the cases, where finz l decree has been passed? 4l The scope of powers of the receiver cum commissionel as held in Shree Ram Urban Inlrastructure Limited vs, Court Receioer, High Court of Bombag [(:2O15) 5 SCC 539/ and its applicabilitl to the present cz se 5) What rv:uld be the effect of the final decree dated

30.12.2O11 passed 1n Application No.519 of 2(.)09 in C.S.No.7 of 1!t58, has to be considered 6) Whe the r the parties can be granted liberty 1.o take recourse to tre remedy to the extent of claiming poss,ession in respecl ol the property, which may be covered by the final decre e 33 At this juncture, it is relevant to ref'er to a judgment of t.-re Division Bench of this Court in Corrtempt Appeal Nc.3li of 2077 and Letters Patent Appeal No.1 of 49 HCJ & NVSKJ Applicotion No.488 of 20l2 in Applicauon No.519 ot 2009 and Appl,cation No.24 of 2024 rn/an.l c-s.No.7 or r95a 2O18 wherein by a common judgment dated 16'O8'2O18 this Court allowed the said Appeal' The said ord'er discloses the manner in which the issues were dealt and the relevant portion of the said judgment is extracted for' the facility of reference: '38.' The claim of the lst respondent in his tDit petition in W.P.No.1729 of 2009 u-tas that the decree holders under the preliminarg decree dated 06-04 1g5g in C.S.No-7 of 1958 ossigned their rights in his fauour and in fouour of others on O1-10- 20O2, in iespect of land of an extent of Ac 143'O0 guntas, fonning part of Surueg Nos' I to 37, 39 to 43 and 45 to 49 of Raidurg uiltage, Seilingampalli Mand.al, Ranga Reddy Distict; that the deed of assignment ttLas accepted bg this Court bg an order d-oted O9-1O-2OO2 in Application No'1146 of 2OO2 and- thot thereafier this Court passed an order on 26-12-2003 in Applicotion Nos'1144 to 1147 of 2002 and. Applic:ation No-14O9 of 2003' '

39. It mag be interesting to note thot uhat ruas claimed bg the lst respondent herein, in his Application No.14O9 of 2O03 tuas to pass a final d-egree in C.S.No.7 of 1958, in respect of land in Surueg No.46, meosuing obout Ac-84'3O guntas in Raidurg uillage, Serilingampalli Mandal, Ranga Red.dg Distict. In the proAer portion in Applicotion No.1409 of 2O03, the lst respondent indicated thot the land in Surueg No.46 is to be correlated to ltem- 50 {CJ & NVSKJ Applicat on r,o itu of 20l2 in Application No 5l I ol2OO9 and Appl,car,or) !o 24 of 2024 n,/andalNo7of1958 234 of ;jchedule-A. But Schedule-A in entiretg hcts beett e.rr:racted bg us in the preceding paragraptt- Iter'-23,1 of Schedule-A as contained in the decr<e do.te d )6-O4-1959 merelg stated Mabtah RaidtLrr1. Neit ter 1nA surueA number, nor the extent of lund nor ?uer. boundaies utere indicated in ltem 2,j4. in add tion the common heading giuen to items-230 io 254 u.tct:; LIST OF MAKTAS (UNDER APPEAL WIT[-{ REVENT-E BOARD). 4 C' . In fact, it is stated in the judq me r '.t renaerect. on O6-O4-1959 in C.S.No.7 of 1958 that ;.t tucts a p reliminary-anm-final decree. Clause 4(S) c.,f the Cecree made it cleor that the Commissioner::- cum Rec,ziuers u.tere entitled, for the purpose <:f effer tin17 the distribution of properties arnong th z pers)ns entitled thereto, to sell all the propertie.s exce cl items-230 to 254 in Schedule-A. The decre,:: in respect of Items 23O to 254, tuas made subject trt the: resttration or release of the same b11 th,z Gout nunent in fauour of Paigah Asman Jahi_ 4l In the light of such a clear cut exclusion, in the c'.ecre e itself and also in the tight of the foct that item 234 in Schedule-A did not contain anA sLtrLrell numDe4 desciption, or ertent of land, ute do not knout hoto the lst respondent herein could hctu,t soug\t ,1" final decree in respect of S.No.46 to the exter t oj 4c.84.30 guntas.

411. In addition, the judgment in the suit uerli clear y indicated that the State Gouernmen.t, uthicli 5l IIC,' & NVSKJ AppLicahon No 4aa of 2012 in Application No 519 of2009 and ApPlicauon No-24 of 2024 in/and C S.No.7 ol IS58 uos impleaded as the 48th defendan| uas gruen up and that the suit ruas dismisse d as against the State Gouernment.

43. But without reference to dlt this' the lst respondent managed to get on assignment in his fauour, recorded by on order dated O9 1O-2OO2 in Application No.1146 of 2OO2 and' also got a ftnal decree on 26-12-2003 in Applicotion No'1409 of 20O3. This shorlts that the orders dated 09 1O-2OO2 and 26-12-2OO3 tttere obtained' completelg by fraud' At the cost of repetition, it should be pointed out' ' a) that the 1st respondent managed to get a ieed of assignment executed in his fauour by the dlcree holders in C'S'No 7 of 1958' d.espite the fact thot clause 4 (g) of the decree did not enable euen the Commtsstoner-cum- Receiuer to sell the land till the lands utere ieteased and restored by the Boord of Reuenue; b) that the 7st respondent managed to identtfu i non-d.escipt propertg and get a final decree in his fauoir, in the sense thot u-then the oioinai decree merelg described ltem 234 of ' Sci'Ledule-A ds Maktah Raidurg, the I sl respondent included the rtthole uilloge of naidurg and identified Surueg No'46 in the uillage; and c) that despite the fact that the suit pas iismissed is against the State Gouernment' the 1st respoident sought to compel the reuenue autlnities to recognize his title' euen^ ,r.,ithort shouing ttLhether or not, the Board of Reuenue ultimatelg released the Moktah propertA in fauour of the decree Lnlders' '4p, -T 52 HC.I & NVSKJ Appli.auon 'lo l8r'l ol2012 in ApfhcaDon Nri 5 .9 of 2009 and Apprr.al on No 24 o12024 rn/ and c- I No 7 of 1954 ,t,1. As ue haue stated earlier, there utas tto dec'ee tgainst the Gouemment, as the suit it ialf wa:; di: missed against the Gouernment. TltereJbre, lhe lsi respondent herein could not,houe exectLtr'd the de,:;ee against the Gouertment in a ciuil cotLtl. Cor seotLentlg, the Gouernment u)ere not bouncl to eJ.fe ct rtutation in the reuenue records, theretta forJ zitirr'7 ang claim that theA maA hot)e , to ti rc properllt. On a finol decree obtained in the abo'rc fas)tior4 in relation to a propertg, tuhich could not he des:il't,d in tlrc plaint schedule, the 1st responclett olttrinetl a direction in W.P.No.1729 of 2OO9. This ts fran .drt[etnt. Since fraud uitiates oll solemn acts, tirc ' lst respondent cannot seek to enforce such a Jin dec'ee through the machinerg auailable to this court in t)te contempt juis diction.

4.i. TlLe learned senior counsel appeanng J tr the 1st 'espondent highlighted the obortiue attempts marle L g tthe Gouernment of Andhro Pradeslt. to impteaC itself as a partA to the Ciuil .Appeal ;n C.A No.1121 of 2OOB filed by a third panty and tirc disrnisr;zl of the appeal filed bg the Gouernment tf Anc'hra Pradesh in OSA /SR/ ./Vo. 21 1 6 of 2O 1 1 . The refot e, he contended that the Gouemment of Anc. hru Pradesh is nout bound bg the fi.nal decree'. .tri. But, LUe do not think so. First of oll- th.ere LUa: nc Cecree as against the Gouentment of Andh,a Pratlesh. The judgment dated 06-04 1959 passerl in C.S No.7 of 1958, u.thich tue haue extracted abou,z, 51 HCJ & NVSKJ Aii'"'::ilf i j;'T :'"j'i'"'l ;;: ^i,ii llii''J Ji;1 ? li i33l shous that the suit uas dismissed as ogainst the Gouemment of Andhra Prad'esh' Once a suit Ls dismissed'as against a partA at the stoge of preliminary decree, tue d-o not knotu.. hottt a final decree uill bind the partg ln fact, the Gouernment appears to haue been ill aduised to fite oSA fSRi No.2116 of 2011 tt'tith a delog of 2633 dogs; uithout realizing that there u)as no preliminary decree against thc Gouernment' In such circumstonces' the dismissal b7 tte detag condonotion petition filed b17 the Gouernment of Andhro Pradesh cannot moke the Gouernment of Andhra Pradesh a judgment debtor'

47. As we haue pointed out earlier' the Contempt 'Case out of tt'thich the present appeals arise, utere born out of the alleged failure of the Tahsildar to implement the orders of this Court in Appticatioi No.1146 of 2OO2, as directed bg this Cowt in W.P.No.1729 of 2OOg The affidouit in support of W.P.No.1729 of 2009, uthich contains the basis of tle claim of the 7st respondent' shottts that the oaerments therein are actuallg castles in the oir' In paragraph 2 of his affidauit in support of W.P.No.1729 of 2009, the lst respondent claimerl that C.S.No.7 of 1958 tuas filed bg one Smt' Saheb Jahi Sulton Jahan Begum, in respect of the matntka properties including the land admeasuing Ac.2O9.OO gntrrtas in Suruey Nos' '1 to 49' situated in Raidurg uillage, Seilingompalli Mand'al' Ranga Reddy Dstrict, listed' ot S'No'234 in Schedule-A of the plaint. But ltem 234 in Schedule-A to the plaint 54 'ICJ & NVSKJ AppLication lio. :88 of2ol2 rn Applicatrox No 5l I of2{109 and Application {o.24 of 2024 i./and l.r. No 7 ot 1954 di,7 not contain (i) either the ertent of land, (ii) or tl''e surt'eg r'lmber, (iii) or the boundaies and (iu) or aity oth( r rl2asure of identification of the propertA. tn addttion, this ltem-234 LDds pdrt of o list of seueral prolerTi.s ifrom S.Nos.230 to 254 listed under tl'e caption LIST OF MAKTAS (UNDER APPEAL WITLI RL:,L'ENLIE BOARD). Therefore, the uery foundatior t r:tf the clann of the lst respondent in W.P.No.1729 'tf 20A9 u,tts illusory. I 4ll. In paragraph 2 of his offidauit in support of lV.P )Vo.1729 of 2OO9, the lst respondent also clo ned that a preliminary decree uas passed. bg thi.s Court and the decree holders executed a deed of osstgntnent in his fauour, in respect of the lond of an extent o.f Ac.143.0O guntas forming part of Suruey .fly'os I t,r 37, 39 to 43 and 45 to 49.

49. But clause 4 (g) of the decree reads os foilc tus' (41 t tctt lhe Commissioners-Receiuers shall,- (a1.. b) .(:) (d)..(e)..A.. @) J v the purpose of effecting the distibution of the proy ert;es among the persons entitled thereto, the Con mi:;:;ioners-Receiuers shall haue potuers to se'll the ;aid properties by public auction and exercise all poLLers necessary for effecting the diuision of the same bettLteen among defendants 2 to 1O and 14 to 22, eacn son getting 2/ 33 and daugh.ter gettinq 1/ 3.] shzre in the properties mentioned in Schedult - A escept ltems-23o to 254 of this schedule and th.e 55 HCJ & NVSKJ Applicarion No 4Ett of20l2 tn Application No 519 of2OO9 tud AppLrcation No 24 of 2024 in/and C.S.No 7 of l95a items of properties allotted to the plaintiff, defendant Nos.2 to 22 will get their share namely each son getting 2/35 and eoch daughter getting 1/35 from the arrears of income, future income, compensation or commutation or sole proceeds of the item-s 23O to 254 of Sch.edute-A detailed under the head of Maktas in'case the same are restored or releasing in fauour of Paigah Asman Jahi. i I I

50. TLrcrefore, there could not haue been an assignmen| bg the decree holders, especiallg tt'then the Commissioners-Receiuers themselues u)ere restrained from deoling tttith these items.

51. Once the entire foundation upon which the claim of the lst respondent is built, is found to be shallou.t, itlusory and fraudulent, all tlrc orders buil.t upon such foundation, should fall like a pack of cards. We hnue not heard of an entire uillage without ang desciption including surueg number ond ertent being cited as one of the items in a suit for partition and ue haue certciinlg not heard of partiis alienating indetbrminate shares pursuant to a preliminary decree, uhich also did not couer these items.

52. It must be pointed out thot there are lot of applications, u.tit petitions, Oiginol Side Appeals, Miscellaneous Petitions, etc., aising out of C.S.No.7 of 1958, ulhich are still pending in a huge botch of cases. It is onlg due to the fact that the entire batch has been specially assigned to this Bench, that ue 56 lCJ & NVSKJ Applicar,on F, 88 of 20l2 tn AppLrcarioD No 519 ol2OO9 and Applcal,otr \o.24 ol 2024 in/and c. i.No 7 of I95E hau? be?n able to take judicial notice of oll the abotrc facts inctuding the auermenls in the plotnt' ilrc jud-qmtrtt in the suit and the list of properties th'zt forr rcd the subject matter of the.. suit We are cc,n sci()us of the fact that the learned Judge, again'st whose .trd-ers the present appeals houe been filed' di.d no'. haue the benefit of the records in C'S'No 7 of 19!;8. Etut u.te haue hod. the benefit of the records in that stti.t, since all matters relating 1o 771s 5c1ifl sttit hat,e been assigned speciallg to this Bench bg t4e orders of the Honble Chief Justice'

53. L is quite unfortunote that public interr:st utas sc cificed in this case, raith a seies of ordttrs betng p,assed in C.S.No. 7 of 1958 in fauour oJ the l -sr re spondent from the gear 2OO2, tt;ithrtut reJ zretce to the oiginal records in C'S'No 7 o.f 19"i8' 1l rs tlris seies of orders, tt-thich led to a chain, uith onz le crling to the other and the other leading tc' a tln "r1 Lnrl so on oncl so Jorth uthich has euenhLr'tlly l"J' lL:e Gouernment in total tt-tilderness ' 'l'he (iicu<zrn ment against tuhom the suit utas dismiss':d, ot th<' instance of the plaintiff, has nout becornr: o mrLjor -;udgment debtor. The lis bettoeen the otL'nzrs on d, the Gouentment uas left undecided in the :':rtit and t,\e mere diuision of the propertg nout in dispute (ltem )-34) uas made subject to the orders of the- Br arcl of Reuenue. If that is so, no Court can compel th? Gcuernment to giue up their ights ond sacn,lce .th,- L'ttqe extent of about 1OO acres in Q prtme ior:alil11 tn fauour of third porties to the detimenl of 57 HCJ & NVSKJ Appli.etion No 488 of 2012 in Apphcati6n No 519 of 2OO9 an.l Applicatron No 24 of 2024 in/and c-S-No 7 ol t95a public interest. Hence, the Letters Patent Appeal and the Conte'mpt Appeal are lioble to be alloued. Accordingly, theg are alloued and th9 order of the learned Judge set aside."

34. Aggrieved by the common judgment in Contempt Appeal No.33 1of 2Ol7 and L.P.A.No.1 of 2O18 dated

16.08.2018, the respondent therein filed a Special Leave Petition in SLP (Civil) No.24646-24647 /2O18 and the same was dismisse d uide order dated 29. 10.20 1 8. Thereafter, the respondent therein filed Rev.I.A.No.1 of 2O2O in L.P.A.No. l/2018 and Rev.LA.No.3 of 2O2O in C.A.No.33 of 2017 seeking review of judgment dated 16.O8.2018. A Division Bench of this Court disposed of the said review applications uide order dated 27.04.2022 by dismissing L.P.A.No. l/2018 by confirming the order of learned Single Judge in C.C.No.2l7/2074 in W.P.No.1729 of 2009 dated

04.to.2017 .

35. Challenging the said order of Division Bench dated 27 .O4.2022, Mr.S.Tirupathi Rao, respondent therein filed Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court allowed the said appeal 58 ItCJ & NVSKJ Applicaron I\. 8a oi 20l2 in ApplicahoD No 5l9 of 2OO9 ed App rahon vo.24 of 2024 ii/an.i C.f..No 7 of l95a and rest rrec. the Contempt Appeal along with Letters Patent A1,pea1 uide judgment dated 22.O7.2024. ANALYSIS A,ND CONCLUSION:

36. Or a perusai of the paragraph 4(g) of the prelimina ry clecree dated O6.04. 1959, it is evident that the defenda n t N cs i2 to 22 were entitled to the properties mentioned a,l item Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule 'A' annexed to the prr:liminary decree, in case the same are restored or releasecl in fevour of Asman Jahi Paigah. In the instant case, adrritft:dly, there is no material to indicate t hat the propertie; nr:ntioned at serial No.230 to 254 of Sc:hedule A' to the pre. iminary decree have been restored or released in favour of Asman Jahi Paigah. It is pertinent to note that as per para 14(g) of the preliminary decree dated 06.04.19.;9, the Commissioners-cum-Receivers hzLve the power to sel the property by way of public aucti,ln and exercise I powers necessary for effecting the divjsion of the sale lretu'een the defendants No.2 to 12 and 14 to 22. Accordinllly, each son would get 2/33 and each d.rughter would ge t 1 ,'33 in the properties of Scheclule 'A' except items 23O t<t 254 of the Schedule and items of prr:,perties 59 HCJ & NVSKJ AppUcation No.4aE ot 2012 rn Application No.5l9 of 2ooq and APPlicaLion No 24 of 2024 in/and c.s No-7 ot !gs8 allotted to the plaintiff. The defendant Nos'2 to 22 will get their share, namely, each son getting 2/35 and each daughter getting 1/ 35 from the arrears -of income future income, compensation or commutation or sale proceeds of the items 2s0 ito 254 of Schedule A' detailed under the head of "Makthas" in case of the same are restored or I released in favotr of Paigah Asman Jahi'

37. In the case on hand, the scope of the Commissioners-cum-Receivers is to divide the extent of shares as specified in the para 4(g) to the extent of arrears of income future income, compensation or commutation or sale proceeds of the said items 230 to 254 of Schedule A'' It is to be noted that the scope of the preliminary decree in which such compromise recorded is only for the purpose of receiving income subject to the condition that they are restored or released in favour of the Paigah Asman Jahi' However, the parties have created documents pertaining to the villages listed in the schedule without there being inclusion of any lands in items 23O to 254 which is in contravention to the compromise recorded in the preliminary decree. As such, there cannot be any scope to I 60 IICJ & NVSru Appl,caLon No 4Ea oI20l2 tn Appl.at,oL, No 5l') ot2009 and Appli.atr rn -,1o.24 of 2024 r./ind rl s; No 7 ot 1954 parties to fi1e any application under preliminary decree dated 06.04 ..959 in C.S. No.7 of 1958 seeking recognition and acce ptei.tce etc. , of any assignment deed lrnd for passing ol ar-ry final decree in C.S. No.7 of 1958.

38. Lea.rned counsel for the final decree holders in Appl.No.5 19 ofi2OOg has filed Additional Material Papers wherein. 1 (:opy of the order of Commissioner of Survey Settlemer rt Inam releasing Maktha lands dated

30.12.19'77 vzas enclosed. However, no document hrls been frled to tL e e>:tent of release order pertaining to the lands in Schedule 'A item Nos.23O to 254 mentioned in the prelimina ry lecree. At this juncture, it is necessary to verify the list. in A' Schedule of the preliminarv de:ree. In the preli nin,rry decree dated 06.04.1959, list of Maktas (under a rperd with Revenue Board) are mentionecl which are as fol[orn's; 23C. Mrrktah Bahadur Ali

231. Maktah Ootapalli

232. Mrrktah Shivarampalli

233. M:rktah Balapoor 2Ii4. Mrrktah Raidurg 6l HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.488 of 20I2 in Application No.5l9 of 2OO9 dd Appljcatron No.24 of 2024 in/and C.S No-7 of 1958

235. Maktah Sough Bowli

236. Maktah Somajiguda

237. Maktah Nawab (Sahah)

238. Maktah Mama Hamukunta

239. Maktah Bagh Kakgud

240. Maktah Hajialigud

241. Maktah Permit Shah Guda

242. Maklah Muzhar Guda

243. Maktah Bagh Mecca ahmoo

244. Maktah Amjad Nagar

245. Maktah Mohammed Nagar

246. Maktah Sangi Guda

247. Maktalr Ali Sahab

248. Maktah Chitaguda I

249. Maktah Yellakur

250. Maktah Yerwagua

251. Maktah Kol Bowli

252. Maktah Shamshiguda

253. Maktah Rai Samand tr

254. Maltah Roshan Bowli * 62 tCJ & NVSKJ Appl.aroD No r88 ot 2012 ln Apphcarlod N.5 9 ol2OO9 dd AppL,car rD \o 24 of2024 in/and C. r.No 7 of 1958

39. It ir; also striking to note that though thc orders were passec. by the Commissioner of Survey Settl*ment - Inam on 30 .12.1977 , the so called release of Makl a lands was brot ght to the notice of this Court for the first time- during tlLe hearing of applications filed for passing of final decree and delivery of possession of those land:; which have not been included in item Nos.23O lo 254 of Schedule 'A' of prr'lim.nary decree. It is also pertinent to n rte that learned senior counsels appearing on bel-ralf of . the objectors p)zLced heavy reliance on the said reiear;e order dated 3( .ltl 1977. However, no proof of release ol Makta lands pe -tauring to item Nos.230 to 254 is filed. It irs also to be noted thz.t when the order was passed rvay back in the year 1977, tlte concerned parties ought to have tak:n steps to inclu,le 1he extent of lands released if an1', in item Nos.230 to '),54 in Schedule A' of preliminary decree. The submiss ons in respect of such lands in item No s.23O to 254 were rr ade at the time of hearing objectionr; to the report of re,::iver cum commissioner dated 06.O7.2023. 40 A.s such, the submissions made on behalf of the objectors; arc unsustainable and in that view of th(' matter, 63 HCJ & NVSKJ Application No.4aE ot 2012 n Applica.ior No-519 ot 2OO9 and Application No 24 ol2O2a inland C S.No.7 of 1958 it can safely be concluded that no lands are available for partition in item Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule A, attached to the preliminarjr decree. In the absence of preliminary decree for item Nos.23O to 254 in Schedule ,A,, no final- decree could have been passed. Therefore, reports filed earlier are withbut proper verification, are fictitious and the same are treated as nullity and are hereby rejected. Accordingly point Nos.1, 2 and 3 are answered against the objectors.

41. With regard to point No.4, the scope and powers of the receiver cum commissioner as held in Shree Rq.m Urban Infrastntcture Limited. (supra), the Hon,ble Supreme Court held that Court Receiver can hold the I properties as custodia legis aod can act in a manner as reasonable prudent trustees and such action on the part of the Court Receiver is nothing but for preservation of the property in question. In the case on hand, the Receiver, in his report reported that there was no property available for partition in item Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule A, of preliminar5z decree, and submitted that the applications filed for delivery of possession, in respect of properties 64 HCJ & NVSKJ Applca nrn 'lo .188 ot 20l2 in r\ptl.an.n li,) 5 ,9 ol2009 and Applt.aLon No 24 of 2024 iD. an I C rl.No 7 ol I95A which st,rod deleted from 'A' Schedule of the preiiminary decree irt ',erms of para 1(d) and para 4 (g) of the Applicati,rn rrnder Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C., and other applicati( )ns requires no further adjudication. It is to be- noted lb at since no property is availabie as Per item Nos.230 to 1t54, the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court (cited su ora ) iS not applicable to the facts of the present case Accord:ng1y, point No.4 is answered. 4'2. Ha'ring considered the rival submissions rnade by learned r;enirr counsel on both sides and submissions of recelver curI commissioner, since the lands rlre not availab [e Ph.r'si ally, the parties may seek their appropriate c remedy rs tLvailable under law. Accordingly point Nos.S and 6 ar,: atrswered

4.3. Ir-i view of observations made in preceding paragrzrphs. the relief sought for in App1.No.488 of 2012 and Aplr1.ltlr>.24 of 2024 cannot be granted zrnd are accordin lly lismissed. However, liberty is granterl to the applican.s ttrerein to avail appropriate remedy as ::vailable under la,v f 65 HCJ & NVSKJ Apphcation No 468 of 20 I2 in ApplicatioD No.51q of 2009 and Application No.24 or 2024 in/and c S.No 7 or tgsa 44 . The report of the receiver cum commissioner dated 06.07.2023 is hereby accepted to the extent of its implication of jrelease order of Commissioner of Survey I Settlement - Inam dated 30. l2.lg77 and the observations opined by the receiver cum commissioner are hereby I I discarded. Tholgh, a preliminary decree has been passed on 06.04.1959 based on a compromise decree, the litigation went in respect of non-existing properties for the last 66 years. 1In view of the observations made ih the foregoing paragraphs and to put a quietus to the suit of the year 1958, we deem it appropriate to formally close C.S.No.7 of 1958. Needless to state that this order shall not l have effect in rispect of any proceeding pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

45. Registry is directed to draft a final decree as per the order dated 13.02. 1970 rn Application No.22g of 1969 in the s-uit in respect of item Nos. I to 229 of schedule A, and Schedules Tl' 'C' .D, .E, and ,F., of preliminary decree and to engross the same on stamp papers. 66 I- :J & NVSKJ Applicarn,n N, 1 ,8 ol20t2 rn ApptLcarxh No i l(t of 20Oq and AppLi( at,o. No 24 oI2024 n/andcSNo7olL958 46, vlohd'Bande Ali and Mr'Ajitsimha Rao, receivers cum comrnissioners appointed by this Court rtid'e c()mmon order datr'd 02.O1.2023 are hereby discharged as receivers cum conl I ntssloners In the resrultl Civil Suit No 'z of 1958 is closed Applicaticn N rd.+AS of 2Ol2 and 24 of 2024 are disnrissed' Applicaticns 1r.hding, if any, shall be decided in the light of I the obserzatrons made above. However, thr:r'e shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K. SRINIVAS RAO, JOINT REGISTRAR N. N OFFICER One Fair Copy trr the, Hon,ble the Chief Justice ALOK ARADHE (t or Ftis Lordships Kind perusali One Fair Copy to the Hon ,ble Sri Justice N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR AND (F,rr His Lordships Kind perusat) , To 1.

2. 1'1 LR Cop es The Under Secretary, Union of lndia Ministry of law, Justice arrd Company Affairs, Nerv Delhi J The Secret ary 'l elangana Advocates Association, Library. High Court Buildings H yderabad I 4 Two CCs to Sri lmran Khan, Additional Advocate General ' High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad The Section Officer, O'S Section' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad- The Section Officer, Accounts Section' High Cou('for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. 5 6

7. The Secretary, Finance Department' Government of Telangana at HYderabad. (OPUC)

8. One CC to Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana' Senior Counsel ' 9. One CC to Sri N.M Krishnaiah' Advocate (OPUC) Advocate (OPUC) 10.One CC to Sri Deepak Misra ' 1 1 . One CC to Naga Srinivasa Rao' Advocate (OPUC) 12.OneCC to Sri Mohammed Sarshar Ahmed ' 13.One CC to Sri Manjiri S Ganu' Advocate ' (OPUC) 'l4.One CC to Sri N. Gangadhar, Advocate (OPUC) 15.One CC to Sri Shyam Sundar Rao Burgula ' Advocate (OPUC) Advocate (OPUC)

16.Two C.D.CoPies w \ F(- I I t t 1 2 .f a o s S'rA] a 1 IPR ?t'6 fr ,i, * D HIGH COURT \ Hcr & NVSK.I DATED:09/01/20 25 L.R. COPY l'O Ill Nl1\1KEI) +DECREE COMMON ORDER APPLTCATTON NO. 4,88 0F 2012 IN APP LrcATtoN NO. 519 0F 2009 AND APPLICATION NO.2,I OF 2024 IN/AND c.s. No.7 0F 1958 DISMISSING TH APPLICATION NO. 488 OF 2012 AND APPLICA'TION :I4 OF 2024 AND CLOSING THE c.s. No. 7 0F t958 ' z4(44 \s- \b t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARAOHE AND TH E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR AP PLICATtoN NO. 488 oF 2012 IN APPLICATION No.5 19 0F 2009 AND APPLICATION NO. 24-oF 2024 IN/AND C.S. N o. 7 0F '1958 Befwee

15. Gar.rgaraju Krishna Mohan, S/o Gangaraju Laxman Rao, age 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

2.8. Dhanenkula Venkatadri, S/o Subba Rao, age 32 years, Occ: Business, R/o K andak ur, Prakasham District.

3. C. Kundla Krishna Murthy, Sio Nagaiah . a1e +Z years, R/o Chandramouli Nagar, Guntur, Q.0. Nandyala Venkateswar Reddy, S/o Ramakoti Reddy, age 49 years, Occ: Business, R/o Bhoudha Nagar, Secunderabad. AND ApplicanS/Final Decree Holders Sahabzadi Sultan jahan Begum (Plaintiff) AND Nawab Zahir Yar Jung Bahadur (D.1) 1(a) Hasmatunrissa Begum I (b) FareedurLnisa Begum i@ Mhod. Fazluddin Khan 1(d) Mohrt. Laigruddin Khan l(e) Mohd. Khutubuddin KJran I (0 Smt. Kareemunnissa Begum

1. Magharuddin Khan - D.2 2(a) Nawab Mohd. Mohiddinnissa Khan 2(b) Nawab Mohd. Mohuddun Khan 2@ Janab Parwarishunnisa Begum 2(d) Janab Gamarunnisa Begum 2(e) Janab Viquam.rnnisa Begum

2. Bashir Jung D.3 3(a) Nawab Khan 3(b) Nawab Shoduddin Khan 3@ Siddiq Sultana Begum 3(d) Nawab Nizamuddin Khan 3(e) Mohamunnissa Begum 3(f) Iftaquannissa Begum

4. Lateefuddin Khan 4(a) Kamalunnissa Begum 4(b) Mohammed Shamauddin Khan 4@ Ahmedunnissa Begum 4(d) Habeebunnissa Begum 4(e) Mahabubunnissa Begum a(f Mohd. Fakruddin 4(g) Jamalunnissa Begum i I I l 4(h) Mohamme' lururissa Begum 4(i) Noorunniss r Be[,um a() Mohd. Nas rud'i n Khan 4(k) Asia Begu'n 4(l) Shaheba B':gun 4(m) Muneer B egur L 4in; Khamrud' in I'J ran 4(o) Azeezudd n Khan lftakaruddin K ran 5(a) Azizunnis;a Begum 5(b) Gaounnis ta Begum sb uotla. KL amar'rddin Khan 5(d) Shoukatu misa Begum 5(e) Akbarudl in fJran 5(0 Khairunn ssa E'egum . Ahmeduddin (ha:r 5 6 b(a) Janab ,\t rlunnissa Begum tr(b) Janab Vi zuarunnissa Begum 6() Janab l{a needunnissa Begttm irdt Junnr Kl,aza l/oinuddin Khan ii"iiir*rr. I\loh'l Khaza Nizamuddin Khan 6( l-) Janab M therunnissa Begum 6( s I Janrh C rustrlumissa Begum o(tt Janab H tsibumissa Begum 6ii) Nawat' t lohJ Raluddin Kian 6O Nikchatrrnni;t Begum

7. Afsaruddin l.han 7(a) Basheer Bh trru zihl Janaba y'iqru Bhanu zo Nau ah Moirt' Jahangiruddin l(]ran

8. tqbatuddin 1.han 9. Waiihuddin Khlt' gtal Smt. Fr recrlrtmissa Begum 9(b) Narval- A lzr luddin Khan 90 Azenru ldir' 3an 9id.1 Nawal \ ousufuddin Khan q(e) Smt \ iqrrrtt unnissa Begum 9( 0 Farhanrnni;lra Begum 9( s) Na\^'al' Asiruddin Khan 91h1 Nar a" M'r:nuddin Khan 9(i) Smt. P rrw:tt ishunnissa Begum l0.Bahauddin Khatt I0(a) J atta',a NliLhboob Begum toiU'r Ne* rb Mohd. Rukmuddin Khan iob'Nu" rb Nl 'hammed Yousuffuddin Khan i 0(d) Panr ba I'rrrwarishunnissa Begum I t.Badruddir: Kl.rr:i 1 l(a) Jana:a lr.r;mathunnissa Begum 1 I (b) Na" aba l"'lohd. Naseeruddin Khan llO Jana la 1\tneerunnissa Begum 1 l(d) Jan: ba ()amarunnissa Begum l2.Jalaludtlir Khar I 3.Zainulabc drlin Khan ( I I I 3 l4.Ghaziuddin K}an l5.Warisuddin Khan I 6. Fareedunnissa Begum lT.Laiqunnissa Begum l8.Izzatunnissa Begum 18(a) Janaba Tahniyat Unnisa Begum l8(b) Janaba Jeenathunnissa Begum ... ' l80 Smt. Tayneytunnissa Begurn

19.Iftakharunnissa Begum 20.Malika Jahan Begum 2l.Akhtar Johan Begum 22.Dawoodunnissa Begum 23.Mahaboobunnissa Begum 24.Rashimunnissa Begum 25.Ladli Begum 25(a) Moisudhowla 25(b) Suttamuddin 25O Bozar Ali Baig 25(d) Liakatali Baig 25(e) Kulsum Begum 26.Liaquatunnisa Begum 27.Fareed Jahan Begum 28.Sultana begum 29.Ghulam Mohammed 30.Mansab Jung 3l.Sahik Mohiuddin 32.William Cessar 33.Mohd. Mahboob Khan 34.Shamsuddin Khan 35.Govind Rao, 36. Sridhar Rao 37 .Jayarao Sambrani 38.N.K. Guruswamy 39.Dr.E.N. Dass 4O.Sahebzada Dildar Ali Khan 4l.Syed Waliulla Hussaini 42.Alinuddin Hussaini 43.Hyderabad Development Coopelative Society 44.Col. Ali Raza 45.Syed Ali Abbas -46.C.S. Venkat Rao 47.Jagir Administrator, Govemment of A.P. 48.Seiretary, Finance Department, Govemment of A.P., Hyderabad 49.Hari Pershad 50.A.P. Policemen Coop. Housing Society Ltd., rep. By its President P Mallesam, Amberpet police Lines, Hyderabad.

51.M/s Rashanna Builders and Developers P. Ltd., rep. By its M'D' Sri Qaiyamuddin Siddiqui, Red Hills, Hyd.

52.G. Raji Reddy 53.P. Pradeep Reddy 54.M. Padmanabha Raju 55.A. Srinivasa Raju 56.V. Lakshminagamani +

57.V. Vijaya la :sl.rn i 58.K. Hema 59.A.L.N. Raju 60.P. Ranga I{a iu 6l.P.JoshiRa.ru 62.P. Bhima R: ju 63.S. Vidya Sa,1ar 64.G. Padn.rar.ra rha F-ecldy 65.A. Gopal R: ju 66.A.V.K.V. It rlu 67.M. Sanga R rddl 68.M. Vitral Rr ddy 69.T. Krishna l -uma r 70.T. Sandhya 7l .Poonam 72.Asita 73. Satoodhan l lpacll ya 7 4.Sarya T5.Kanhaya 76.Chinta Devi TT.Archana 78.P. Vijayallh uatL 79.P. Narayana mrr r S0.Nisarunnisa 8l.Habeeb Sar,var 82.Rafeeq Fert ze 83. Sycd Muqta Jur 84.Noman Mol iud,l n 85.Md. Shajiuddin 86.Nansheer M :chtx:mnnisa 87. Syed Naifiii ah llussain 88.Syed Muhst ir 89.A. Roopa 90.D.S. Rao 9 l.K. Balasubr rhmanyam 92.Salesh Anre' Sinlf 93.Mohammed Mair ed Khan 94.Rizwan I zbr I 95.Jaffer Yamari 96. Shaik Moha nn.r:,1 Ayub 97.A.V. Jai Ral 98.AIi Bin Say,,ed 99.Abdul Quad:i 100. Md I rrabirr 101. Syedrltal'.{ussain l-02. Syed.'oust f I{ussain 103. Syed v{untaz Ahmed 104. Nikhat lahrrn 105. Asid ltin ti ryed Brawaz 106. Ali Brn Srt:d Brawaz 107. Asil I in Sl,ed Brawaz 108. Syed llin Sayeed Brawaz 109. Mocn Beg.rm { lnsane Aali dt.9-3-2000 in application Nos.2 t 5 & 2t7 of 2000. I 10. Ayut Bin Salam I I l. Ghousemohiddin I|,2. Naema Basheer 113. Siraj Mohiddin ll4. Kum. A. Harini 115. Zarina Begum I 16. 117., Moiddinzzamatn (D.50 to I l7 are added as per court order - 1 l9 My Palace Mutually Aided Coop. Society, Shantinagar, Hyd. I19. P. Narsa Reddy 120. D. Prabhakar Reddy l2l. P. Veera Reddy 122. D. Balakrishna Reddy 123. Om Sri Sai Mutually Aided Coop. Housing Society Ltd., 124. Pleasant Engineers, rep. By Sripada Deshpande, 125. M/s S. Deshpande & Co, rep. By Sripada Deshpande, 126. M/s Anish Constructions rep. By Smt. Nirmala D. 127 . M/s Orient Constructions rep.by Smr. Afroze Shabana Siddiqui, 128. T. Narsing Rao 129. Smt. Susheela 130. Nawab Saleemuddin Khan 13 1. Smt. Nigar Sultana, 132. T. Ganesh Kumar 133. Smt. Swarnalatha, 134. M. Ganesh, 135. Kaushik Mutually Aidcd Coop. Society Ltd., 136. Ishrath Begum 137 . Mohd Rasheed Khan 138. Abdul Raheem Khan 139. Veshan Singh, 140. Shiek Naseem 141. Ameer Kian 142. N4/s Bhaskara Esrates P. Ltd., 143; M/s Swetha Estate P. Ltd., 144. M/s Sai Venkata durga Coop. Flousing Society, 145. Krishna Prasad 146. M. Shobharani 147. M. Bhagawathi 148. G. Venkat Reddy 149. Ir4/s Build Links, 150. Abdul Hakeem 151. Qamarunnisa Begum 152. Pyari Devi, 153. Rajesh Singh 154. Vikram Singh 155. Rekha Devi, 156. Abdul Rahman Khan 157. Farooz Khan 158. YousufKhan 159. Bepasha Begum 160. Ayoob K1.ran 161. Nadeem Begum 6 - Rrth :ne E esum Am rer' Ii ran Rubina 3egum Rizr vana Begum N,:t-- rjalta I Begum Sha;k Nr;eem Meernru jlhid Hussain ZLrb rida l]egum S? tl, vrr ll 1x111 51 er Ar r, alrrddi n MuI htar .\hmed Khan g.rJ Hu 1i A. ( opalriju, A. F rishna Raje, M/s KaI rrni Constructions, M-. ihari:d Sanghi M,'s :msar Construction pvt. Ltd., Babr Sh r fuddin Colony Residents Welfare Society Slcr NIa I mood Hussain Fa isr lbir rbood, Syec Sai i rddin NIoh J. K I aja Omer Hussain lVlth l. Y r: rrsuf Alib n \ r hd. Bin Hajeb BabL lll r Ivl.A H.r., Moh t. N r roof Ali Yorr: ul'[;in Abood Mah nooJ Alikl-ran Mcl. {c,.r. iahan Begum Mcl. ihr, ,,, arruddin Sade Arr l(han Moh, t. \ L.reeruddin Mall roo I Ali Imlar Kl :n Sy. t1 S: ,rr Ali Kian Ka)yr n (-cDstructions pvt. Ltd K..[r. rtlr K. l1:ia. r Prarrt :e l Llrni a K. Su.ll., shan K. I)r-, L-. .; k ar K. Ila vi K. Kl shne K. Ila nLr Mohd \\'rL: if Zaman Zeeta .h L;;.-Z.aman B. R.a,lhr Mecnr Kuliami T. K Lir unrr lLcddy T. Balrranr Rcddy Syed ( ihorr: c Khadri

162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 17 t. 172. 113. 174. 175. 176. t77 . 178. 179. r 80. l8l. 182. 1 83. r 84. 185. 186. t87. 188. 189. 190. I9t. t92. I93. t94. r 95. 196. 197. 198. t99 200. 201. 202. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207 . 208. 209. 210. 2tt_ 212. 213. 214. 7 I (

215. 216. zl7. 2t8. 2t9. 220. 221. 222. 223. 224. 225. 226. 227.

229. 230. 231.

233. 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 242. 243. 244. 245. 246. 247, 248. 24e. 250. 251. 252. 253. 254. -255. Smt. Sajeda Begum Sm1. Sajeda Khatoon, K. S ujatha, Y.V.N. Prabhakar P. Raghunandan Khaiseruddin Khan I\tls Pearl Plaza rep. By its Managing Partner Capt' Kishan, Kastajeevula Sanghatana, rep. By its President T Krishna-, Y. Anita Smt. Laiquinnisa Begum Smt. K. Sulochan Nazia Parveen K. Dhanender ReddY V. Srinivas ReddY P.S. Naidu Janaba Yousufunnisa Begum Janaba Tyaba Begum Nawab Mohd. Abdul Barkath Khan Nawab Mohd. Fareeduddin Khan Janaba Younisunnissa Begum Mohd. Basheeruddin ahmed Nawab Mohd. Daveruddin Khan Mohd. Sirajuddin Ahmed Janaba Waj ahatunnisa Begum Janaba Qadeerunnisa Begum Ayesha Bano Ahmed Janaba Mahboobunnisa Begum Janaba AtiYa Begum Janaba Azmath Ftima Janaba Zainubunnisa Begum Karishif Unnisa Begum Khader Unnisa Begum Nawab Mohd. Zainul Mutakheen Khan Nawab Mohd. Ruknuddin Khan Nawab Mohd. Ismailuddin Khan Nazab Mohd. Zainul abedin Khan Janaba ameen Unnisa Begum Janaba bilques Unnisa Begum Janaba Humera Unnisa Begum Janaba Anees Fathima Begum M.A. Bari & B. Shyamsunder Rao, Advocate Receiver-cum- Commissioners, High Court of A P', Hyderabad' 256. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District 257. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar' RESPONDENTS 7 Application llnder Order 21 Rule 35 R/W Sec' 151 of Civil Prr)cedure Code praying that for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit" this Hon'ble Court may be plear;ed to direct the Receiver-cum- Gommissioner to handover the possession of the Schedule & Properties mentioned in this application i'e" a) Scheduf es l, larrd admeasuring Ac' 1-25 guntas in Sy' No' 57 1l8lA of Shamshiguda Village, Balangar Mandal' R'R' District' bounded by: 60' Wide Road SY' No' 57/1 Part SurveY No' 57/1 Part' SurveY No' 57 /'t Part Norlh : Sor:th : Eas: : Wes't : :, - r,r-,- b) Schedule-Bl,lndadmeasuringAc.l-30guntasinSy.No.57lBlAot Shamshigu<la village, Balanagar Mandal' R'R'District' bounded by : 50'Wide Road North : Sotrth : SY'No' 57 /1 Part' East : SurveY No' 57/1 Part' We st : Survey No' 57 /1 Part to the petitilner in the interest of justice' Counsel for the Appellants : SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS' SENIOR COL'NSLE FOR SRI N. M. KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No' 20: SRI SHYAM SUNDAR RAO BURGULA .a e I I i- I i I i t--" \n q.p t ,:'.1/ APPL.No. L+ or 2dl4 Itr C.S. No. 7 of 1958 Between: Kasani Sharkar, S/o I.+fe Sh':i.Bahaj; aged 44 years, Occ: Business, FVo. JlMp/2_ l-231131, Iidna N.{gar..q .Q,-q-l,lt+ , Shamshiguda village, Balanagar Mandal, R.RDiskict.

2. Kasani Indira, Wo Late K. Srde Ramulu, aged 47 years, Occ: House ra,ife, R/o H.No.2-l-23i 128, Indiranagar Colony, Shamshiguda village, Balanagar Mardal, R.R. District.. ., petitioners. AND l. . Nawab Zahir Yar Jung Bahai{ur (D_1) I (a) Hasmatunnissa Begum l(b) Fareedunnisa Begum I @ Mhod. Fazluddin Khan l(d) Mohd. Laigmddin Khan 1(e) Mohd. Khutubuddin Khari 1(f) Smt. Kareemunnissa Begum ? 3 4 . Magharuddin Khan - , D.2 2(a) Nawab Mohd. Mohiddirurissa Khan 2(b) Nawab Mohd. Mohuddun Khan D.3 . 2@ Janab Parwarishunnisa Begum 2(d) Janab Gamarunnisa Begum 2(e) Janab Viqu am-uurisa Begum . Bashir Jung 3(a) Nawab Khan 3(b) Nawab Shoduddin Khan 3@ Siddiq Sultana B'egum 3(d) Nawab Nizamuddin Khan 3(e) Mohamunflissa Begum -i (f) lftaquannissa Begum Lateetuddin Khan 4(a) Kamalunnissa Begum 4(b) Mohammed Shamauddin Khan 40 Ahmedunnissa Begum 4(d) Habeebunnissa Begum 4(e) Mahabubunnissa Begum a(f Mohd. Fakruddin 4(g) Jamalururissa Begum 4(h) Mohammedumissa Begum 4(i) Noorunnissa Begum 4O Mohd. Nasiruddin Khan i I I / i I I l i i i I I I , I 2 4( <) A sia Begum 4(L) ShrLheba Begum 4( m) Il uneer Begum 4( n) K Lamruddin KJran 4(o) 4-2 eezuddin Khan

5. II aka rrddin Khan ,it a) .a z izunnissa Begum 5t b) (ii oLrnnissa Begum 5 ) \krhd. Khamaruddin Khan ird) S I'oukatunnisa Bcgum 5r e) A.tr baruddin Khan -i f) KI a unnissa Begum

6. A hmeduddin Khan 6r n) J nab Alalunnissa Begum 6 bl Ja rab Vizuarunnissa Begum 6 ) Jrurab IIameedunnissa Begunr 6 d) Ja rab Khaza Moinuddin Khan 6 e) llL*'ab Mohd. Khaza Nizamuddin Khan 6 f) J urab Maherunnissa Begum 6 g)Janab Gousufunnissa Begum 6 h) .lanab Hasibumissa Begum 6 i) )r arvab Mohd. Rafuddin KIan 6 j) 1r i ichatunnisa Begum /. -\ tsf,ru lclrlr l(han 7 a't ItrLsheer- Bhanu 7 b) Janaba Viqar Bhanu 7 O fir.wab Mohd. Jahangiruddin Khan

8. IL lbal,rrldin Khan 9. \/ajilurddin Khan rr a ' l,r rl. fareedumissa Begutn 9 ib) i:'r*ab Afzaluddin Khan 9O ,':'cmuddin K-han 9ld) l.l rwab Yousufuddin Khan 9 ie) lirnt ViquarurLnissa Begum 9ifl I r rhatunnissa Begum 9(g) iiau'ab Asifuddin Khan 9r(h) l{ r\r,ab Moinuddin Khan 9(i) Srit. Parwarishunnissa Begum I tr.l' aha.r ldin Khan 1 0(a) . anaba Mahboob Begum 10(b. .'Iawab Mohd. Rukmuddin K-han I 0C )'iawab Nlohammed Yousuffuddin Khan I 0(d' )anaba Parwarishunnissa Begum 1 I .I iadr,r ldin Khan 1 l(a) . anaba Asmathunnissa Begum 1 1(b ia\\,aba Mohd- Nasceruddin Kian I 1C, J anaba Ameerunnissa Begum I l(d fanaba Qamantmissa Begum I l].J rhhuldin Khan f -i.l.ainr rlaboddin Khan I4.( ihaz irddin Khan 3 l5.Warisuddin Khan 16.Fareedunnissa Begum l7-Laiqunnissa Begum l8-lzzatunnissa Begum l8(a) Janaba Tahniyat Unnisa Begum I8(b) Janaba Jeenathunnissa Begum 18O Smt- Tayne),tunnissa Begum I 9.IfLakharunnissa Begum 20.Malika Jahan Begum 2l.Akhtar Johan Begum 22.Dawoodunnissa Begum 23.Mahaboobunnissa Begum 24.Rashimunnissa Begum 25. Ladli Begum 25(a) Moisudhowla 25(b) Sultamuddin 25@ Bozar Ali Baig 25(d) Liakatali Baig 25(e) Kulsum Begum 26.Liaquatunnisa Begum 27.Fareed Jahan Begum 28.Sultana begum 29.Ghulam Mohammed 30.Mansab Jung 3 l.Sahik Mohiuddin 32.Willia.rn Cessar 3 3, Mohd. Mahboob Khan l4.Shanrsutldin Khan 35.Govind Rao, 3 6. Sridhar Rao 37 .layarao Sambrani 38.N.K. Gqruswamy 39.Dr.E.N. Dass 40.Sahebzada Dildar Ali Khan 4 I.Syed Waliulla Hussaini 42-Alinuddin Hussaini' 43-Hyderabad Development Cooperative Sociery 44.Col. Ali Raza 45.Syed Ali Abbas 46.C.S. Venkat Rao 47.Jagir Administrator, Govemment of A.P. 48-Secretary, Finanee -Department, Government of A.p., Hyderabad 49.Hari Pershad 50-A.P. Policemen Coop. Housing Society Ltd., rep. By its president p. Mallesam, Amberpet police Lines, Hyderabad. 5 l.M/s Rashanna Builders and Developers p. Ltd., rep_ By its M.D. Sri' Qaiyamuddin Siddiqui, Red Hills, FIyd.

52.G. Raji Reddy 53.P. Pradeep Reddy 54.M. Padmanabha Raju 55.A. Srinivasa Raju + Krishna Kumar

56. V. [.e kshminagamani 57. V. \'ijaya lakshmi 58. (. Fk,ma 59 {.1. }1. Ra.iu 60. ). Ra rga Raju 61. )..1o;lrrRaj u 62. ). Bhima Raj u 63. i. Viiiya Sagar 64.,i- Pa Jmanabha Reddy 65 \. Ccpal Raju 66. \.\,'t-.\/. Raju 67. ,,I. Sanga Rcddy 68. l. \'irtal Reddy 69, -. 70, '. SarLdhya 7l.l)oorLem 712.- \sirr 7.1. :;ato ),lhan Upadhya 7.1. !,arvl 7:!.1,anir: ya 7ti.( lhiutz Do,i ,1J t,rchan 78,I . Vi;rLyaBharati 7!).I . Nz.rlyanamma E().I Iisaru unisa 8 1 .I labee r Sirrwar 82.I. alet:r Fcroze E,:.Syed lt,luqtadur 84.1r omuI N,Iohiuddin E5.\ Id Slrajiuddin 86.1 ans t,:er Mecheerunnisa 87. S yed fiailullah Hussain 8 E. S yecl i\Tuhshir 89.A, Rc,c pa 90.t.S. I( ro 9l .I( . Balrsubralmranyam 92.S rlesh Arner Singh 93.N ohanrmed Majeed Khan 94.R zu,rLr Izbal 95 Ji ffer '''amani 96 S raik }.,{ohammed Ayub 97AV..ziRaj 98AiBinSal,eed 99.A;dLrl tluadri 100. lt Id. Ibrahim 10 . l0:1. S yed Yousuf Hussain l0:i. Syed Muntaz Ahmed 101. \rikhat Jahan l0-',. l sid Bin Sayed Brawaz 106. 1C7. A li Bin Syed Brawaz A sif Bin Syed Brawaz S t,ed altafHussain {

108. 109. I10. l1l. fiz. 1 13. n4. l 15. I 16. t17. 2000 I t8. I19. t20. L2t. tzz. 121. tz4. tzs. t26.

129. 130. r3 l. t3z. 133. t34. 135. 136. 137. lJd. r 39.

140. t41. t4?. r43 . 144.

145. 146, 147 .

148. t49. 150. l5l. 1.52.

154. 15 5, i 56. 151 . l5E.

159. Syed Bin Sayeed Brawaz Moem Begum Ayut Bin Salam Ghousemohiddin Naema Basheer Siraj Mohiddin Kum- A. Harini Zarina Begum Insane Aali Moiddinzzamam (D.50 to 117 are added as per court order dt.9-3- in application Nos.2l5 & 217 of 2000. My Palace Mutually Aided Coop. Society, Shantinagar, Hyd. P- Narsa Reddy D. Prabhakar Reddy P. Veera Reddy D. Balakrishna Reddy Om Sri Sai Mutually Aided Coop. Housing Sociery Ltd., Pleasant Engineers, rep. By Sripada Deshpande, lWs S. Deshpande & Co, rep. By Sripada Deshpande, lWs Anish Constructions rep. By Smt. Nirmala D. M/s Orient Constructions rep-by Smt. Afroze Shabana Siddiqui, T. Narsing Rao Smt. Susheela Nawab Saleemuddin Khan Smt. Nigar Sultana, T. Ganesh Kumar Smt. Swarnalatha, M. Ganesh, Kaushik Mutually Aided Coop. Society Ltd., Ishrath Begum Mohd Rasheed Khan Abdul Raheem Khan Veshan Singh, Shiek Naseem Ameer Khan Ivls Bhaskara Estates P. Ltd., N4/s Swetha Estate P. Ltd., M/s Sai Venkata durga Coop. Housing Sociefy, Krishna Prasad M. Shobharani M. Bhagawathi G. Venkat Reddy Iv{/s Build Links, Abdul Hakeem Qamarumisa Begum Pyari Devi, Rajesh Singh Vikram Singh Rekha Devi, Abdul Rahman Khan Farooz Khan Yousuf Khan Bepasha Begum i E ,\yoob Khan i'ladeem Begum {ahene Begum Ameer Khan R ubina Begum Rizwana Begum \ oorjahan Begum Shaik Naseem Nleermujahid Hussain Z ubaida Begum Sadeya Begum Syed Anwaruddin I4ukhtar Ahmed Khan S .Q. I{uda li. Goparaju, rr. Krishna Raje, l,,l/s Kalyani Constr:uctions, l '4r. Sharad Sanghi l'4/s cmsan Construction Pvt Ltd , llaba Sharfuddin Colony Residents Welfare Societl' liyed Mahmood Hussain Faisalbin abood, llved Saifuddin l',lohd. Khaja Omer HussaLn r4ohd. Yousuf \libin Mohd. Bin I{ajeb labtr Rao \4.A. Hai, Mohd. Maroof Ati Yousuf Bin Abood M.rhmood Alik}an Md. Noorjahan Begum Md. Khalryamuddin Sadat Ali KIan Mohd. Naseeruddin Mahmood Ali Inran Khan S1'ed Sardar Ali Khan Kalyan Constructions Pvt. Ltd , K. Jyothi K. llal aiah Prameela L rmila K. Sudhershan K . Prabhakar K. Ravi K. ti'ishna K. Ramu Mohd. Wasif Zaman Zeenath-Uz-Zamao B. Radha NIeena Kulkami f. Kusuma ReddY

161. 162. 1 63. 164. 165. 16(,. t6i. 16S.

169. 110. t7. t7)-. tll. t7 '1. \'75.

175. t77. 178. 179. 180, 181, 182.

183. 184 1E5. 1E(,. 187 1E8 1E9 190 1() L ()2 I 19i 194 195 196 t91 198 199 z0( 201 20i 20: 20. 70: 20( 20'. 201 201 2l{ 2l 2t'. 7 _21? T. Balaram Reddy

214. Syed Ghouse Khadri 215. Smt. Sajeda Begum 216. Smt. Sajeda Khatoon, 217. K. Sujatha, 218. Y.V.N. Prabhakar 219. P. Raghunandan 220. Khaiseruddin Khan Z2I. Ir,ys Pearl Plaza rep. By its Managing Partner Capt. Ki-shan, 222- Kastajeel.ula Sanghatana, rep. By its President T. Kriihna, 223. Y. Anita 224. Smt. Laiquinnisa Begum 225. SmL. K. Sulochan 226. Nazia Parveen 227. K. Dhanender Reddy 228. V. Srinivas Reddy 229. P.S. Naidu 230. Janaba Yousufunnisa Begum 231. Janaba Tyaba Begum 232. Nawab Mohd. Abdul Barkath Khan 233. Nawab Mohd. Fareeduddin Khan 234. Janaba Younisunnissa Begum 235. Mohd. Basheeruddin ahmed 236. Nawab Mohd. Daveruddin Khan 237. Mohd. Sirajuddin Ahmed 238. Janaba Wajahatunnisa Begum 239. Janaba Qadeerunnisa Bcgum 240. Ayesha Bano Almed 241. Janaba Mahboobunnisa Begum 242- Janaba Atiya Begum 243. Janaba Azrnath Ftima 244, Janaba Zainubunnisa Begum 245. Karishif Unnisa Begum 246. Khader Unnisa Begum 247. Nawab Mohd- Zainul Mutakheen Khan 248. Nawab Mohd. Ruknuddin Khan 249. Nawab Mohd. Ismailuddin Khan 250. Nazab Mohd. Zainul abedin Khan 251. Janaba ameen Unnisa Begum 252. Janaba bilques Unnisa Begum 253. Janaba Humera Unnisa Begum 254. Janaba Anees Fathima Begum 255. Sahebzadi Sultan Jahan Begum 256. The Distnct Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 257. The Tahsildar, Balanagar Mandal, R.R.District. 258. M.A. Bari & B. Shyamsunder Rao, Advocate Receiver-cum- Commissioners, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Application Urrder Order 23 Rule 3 and Order 20 Rule '18 R li'Sec. 146 of l.- Civil Procedure Co,le praying for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, that this Hon'hle Court may be pleased to pass a final decree in favour of the Petitioners he rein in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dt. 29'-12- 2O13 to an extent of Ac. 0-32 gts in Sy.No. 57 of Shamsiguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, R.R. Distrir:t, being item No. 252 of Schedule "A" annexed to the preliminary decree ir C.li.No.7/1958, which was allotted to the defendant No. 14 as per the scheme o f partition submitted by the Receivers-cum- Commissioners and approved as per thc orders passed in Appl.No. 495/2009 in C.lS.No.7/1958 and direct the Rece iver--cum-Commissioner to confirm the possession of (he petitioners by handirtg over possession of the final decree schedule land to the petitioners. The applicatiorr cc ming on for hearing, upon perusing the application and affidavit filed therervith and the record in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J. rrabhakar, Senior Counsel for Sri Deepak Misra, Advocate for the Appellants and Sri Naga Srinivas Rao, Advocate for Respondernt Nos.1 to 11, 13 to 20, 22 to 258 and Sri A. Venkatesh, Senior Counsel for Sri Mohammed Sarshar Ahnred, Advocate for Respondent Nos.12 and 21 and Sri Sunil B. Ganu, Senior Corrnsel for Ms. Manjari S. Ganu, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 118 and 126 Anrl Sri Vedula Venkat Ramana Senior Counsel for the applicants in Application Nos. 495 of 2008, 505 and 508 of 2013 and Sri lmran Khan, Addl. Advocate Gerreral for the State. ,1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD C.S.No.7 of 19s8 1{ CAUS E TITLE P-l (a) Smt. Farhat Jahan Br P- l.Sahebzadi Sultan Jahan Begum D/o, Nawab Moinuddowra Bahadur Wo. Syed Muntajibuddin Khan, Cur,", Urrfirn,1g" 22 years, Occ: Household, R-/o. Secunderabad. (Died). o cc : Hos uewire, *" ;tili #"n.: liT #l;ffi :*,:tff;r;f ", Occ : , R/o. Bunglow No_215, Nludfort,I""rna".uUra P-1 (b) Syed Nasiruddin Khan, Sio_ Sultan Jahan e"grrnl ug" 60 years, P-1 (c) Smt. Afzalunnisa Begum,.D/o. Sultan Jahan Begum, age 56 years, occ : Hosuewife, R/o. Bunglow rvo.z r s, lrruJrort,Tcunderabad. - P-i (d) Smt. Kareemunnisa I _ occ : Hosuewife, *" ;ff ;il,r("; ;ij:"ilIxTi:J"-"T;::".0:: r*^, P-l (e) Smt. Vilayath Jahan Begum, D/o. Sultan Jahan B;;r-, age 67 years, _ Occ : Hosuewife, R/o. Bunglow No.Zf S, fr,uJfo.t,Gunderabad. P-1 (f) Smt. Vizarath Jahan B occ:Hosuewife,*";:i;il;,,i";;ffil1x1];:J.-#;:.1:lr*^, (App el I a nls,/Pet itio n e rs No. p ajjernntsint'iio;;; ";;.','kl,' Appl.No.934/2013). {,,0"?,|:," ,"i:1":0,;:i:f,,,0? ;{.i;;;,'",X Verses . . ..Appellantslpetitioner I 'DJ 'Nawab zahir yar JungBahadur, S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowra Caste: Muslim. age 22 yZars,Hissadar, R/o. Secunderabad & Hyderabad. (Deceased) Hahmathunnisa Begum Wo. Nawab Zahir Vur Crnl, age 55 years, a) Iarid Jahan rieeum, W3, Nawab Zahir y^. C;;';; 55 years, b) Mohammed Fazluddin Klian S/o. Nu*uU Zutri, i* ?unj, age 38 years, c) Mohammed Laiquddin Khan S/o. Nawab Zahir ya.Lrny,,ug" 35 years, (Being d) Mohammed Khutbuddin Khan S/o_ Nawab Zahir yar Gunj, age 32 years, e) Smt.*Kareemururissa Begum Wo. Nawab Zahir yarGunj, age 26 years, minor as GpA Hahmathunnisa Begum) (All Residents of Secunderabad) (Since Decea.se I pu LRs Defts. (l.a to fi broughr on record us p(r Court order dated 10.07.1970 in ,tppt.No.I64 of 1969). 2. D-2.Mazharutld in l(han, S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadtrr, Casle: M rslirn. age 35 years, Hissadar, R/o. Kha:rtabad, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

3. D-2 (a) Nawa I N,lotrd. Moinuddin Khan, S/o. Mazharuddin Khan, AgeC rborrl 70 years, Occ : Household, R/o. Masabtank. II-r drrabad.

4. D-2 (b)Nawat N{olrd. Mohiuddin Khan, S/o. Mazharuddin Khan, Aged abour 68 years, R/o. Kaktiyanagar, Nanalnagar. Hyderat ad. :. D-2 (c) Janabr Pir-rvarishunnisa Begum, D/o. Mazaharuddin Khan. Agerl iLborLt 73 yearc, Occ : Household, R/o. H.No.6-2_j()/2. Lakdil apul Hyderabad.

6. D-2 (d) Janabr Qanrarunnisa Begum, Dio.Mazharuddin Khan, agecl al:rout 69 years, Occ : I {ousehold, R/o. H.No.6_3_ 597lA,Banjara Hitls, Hyderabad. 7 . D-2 (e) Janaba Virl:Lrunnisa Begum, D/o. Mazharuddin Khan, agcd rb,rut 60 years, Occ : I Iour;r hold, R/o. H.No.33i44, Block Koramangla, Banralore. Kamar rkl. (Respondent No 3 to 7 are added as Defendant Nos.D_2 (a) to (e1 beittg Legal represenlative ol detased Defendant No.2 as per Courl order dated i)2.02.2000 in Appl. No.73/20001. 8. D-3. |iawab Bastir Jung Bahadur, S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla I lahadur, Castc: Mu:;lim, age 32 years, Hissadar paigha, R/o. Saroo:naqa,r, Hl dcn bad.

9. D-3(a).Nawal, Sha-rabuddin Khan @ied issueless), S/o. Bashir Jung_ 10. D-3(b). Narva I Shz.hrdurtdin Khan @ied), S/o. Bashir Jung. I l. D-3(c). Janab,L Sirl,liqa Sultana Begum, Wio. Late Nawab Sirajuddin Kha,, aged arou_ 50 years, Occ: Household, R/o.H.No.6-3_IiOL, tti,ja",, Treasl re Al)arlments, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. ' _

12. D-3(d).Nawat Ni:uiLmuddin Ktru", SlI. Laie Bashir Jung, aged ahour.,,2 years, ye ars. )cc: Household, R/o.Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. Occ : llusin:ss, R /o.H.No.4_ l4-75lA, Hasan Nagar, Hyderaba,l. 13. D-3(e).Janaba Ivlohammed unnisa Begum, D/o. Late Aurnt fung. a-ge:l about 55 14. D-3(f) Janaba lnreqabunnisa Begum iDiejl, D/o."iaie easntr Jung. (Respondents No I tc 14 are added as Defendant Nos.D_3(n) to (fl being tegat represenrarive of :lecetsed Defendanr No.3 as per court or(ter dotei 02.0z.iooi io Appl.No.73/2000) 15. D-3(g)-Nawab Sab,i- r,utfuddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Sirajuddin Khrn, aged about.32 yet.rs, Occ : private Service, R/o.H.No.6_3_ I 102, I{icCen . Treasur e Apartments, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 16. D-3(h).Janaba Fatinra fna.n,.!/o_ I-rf, N"*rt S"":raa_ KIan, :rgcd ,Lbout 36 years, ()cc ; Household, R/o.H.No.6_3-l l0r, Hidden Tr.easure Apafi rn 3nts, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. i7. D-3(i).Nawab Abdul Rahman Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Shahiduddin Khan, aged about 42 years, Occ: Business, Wo.AzizBagh Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad. - Hyderabad. 18' D-3o'Nawab Hasan Nooruddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab-shahiduddin Khan, aged about 39 years, Occ: Business, No.AzizBagh Colony, fofi"flo*ti, ' - 19. D-3(k).Janaba Sumera Imran, D/o. Late Janaba Inteqabunnisa Begum, aged about 20. D-3(l). Janaba Saba Nas n:D./? 28 years, Occ: Household, R./o.Mudfort, Sec_'bad. !?nJanaba Inreqabunnisa Begum, aged about 26 years, Occ: Household, Rio.Mudfort. Sec_bad.

21. D-3(m).Janaba Sara Naseer, D/o. Late Janaba 24 years, Occ: Household, R/o.Mudfort, Sec_bad. Begum, aged about (Respondents No.t5 to 2l are impleaded as Defendants No.3(d,01, (0,0, (k), (l) & (m) vide orders dated t3_09_2013 in Appt.Ni.B3B/2013). 22. D-4. Nawab Latifuddin Khan S/o. Laie Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, 'rteqabunnisa Caste: Muslim, age 36 years, Hissadar paigha, R/o. Jahanuma, Hyderabad. @eceased) 23- D-4 (a) Janaba Kamalunnissa Begum, wo. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan, aged about 92 years, Occ: Nil, R/o.Flat No.507, Kushal Towers, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. 24 D-4 (b)Nawab Mohd. Shamsuddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Larifuddin Khan aged about 75 years, Occ: Retired, IVo. H.No. I l_5_416/1,Red IIills, Hyderabad.

25. D-4 (c)Janaba Ahmedunnissa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan, aged about 73 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Suite 339, 515, St. Laurent, BIvd, Ottawa KIK 35 Ontario, Canada.

26. D-4 (d) Janaba Habeebunnissa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan, aged about 70 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Flat No.50g, Kushal Towers, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. " 27 . D-4 (e) Janaba Mahboobunnissa Begum, D/o. Lare Nawab Latifuddin Khan, aged bbout 69 yeirs, Occ: Household, R/o. Flat No.402, Indra Lok Apartments, Baajara Hills, Hyderabad.

28. D-4 (0 Nawab Mohd. Fakaruddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan, agcd 'about 62 years, Occ: Business, R/o. II.No. t 1_5_416/1, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

29. D-a G) Janaba,Jameelunnissa, BegumD/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan, aged about 61 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.5037, Wi ow Wood Diive, Missisauga L5R 3 Rs.Ontario, Canada. 30- D-4 (h) Janaba Mohammedumissa Begum D/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Klian, aged about 60 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.l1_5_416/1, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

31. D-4 (i) Janaba Noorunnissa Begum D/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan, 32. D-4 Q) Nawab Mohd. Nasiruddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Larifuddin Khan, aged .ah, about 59 years, Occ: Employee in abroad, R/o. post Box No.22g, Sha U.A.E.

33. D-4 (k) Ja:la ba 1\tsia Begum Mahal, Wo. Nawab Latifuddin Khan, aged about g0 ;'ear;, Occ: Household, Wo_ Flat No.402, Indralok Apartments, Banjara Iliil., I l-r,Icrabad.

34. D-4 (l) Janat,a S hrhar.ra Begum D/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Kirau, aged about 60 ycars, Or:r: Horsehold, R/o. Flat No.402, Indralok Apartmcnis, Banjara Hills Flyderabad.

35. D-4 (m)Jana ra tr{unirunnissa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin h.han aged ab,rut 59 .,,ears, Occ: Household, R/o. Flat No.402, Indralok Apartients, Banj rra L il1s. Hyderabad. (deleted as per Ciurt dated 19.12 I95g in Appt L'o ,'2t/I9SB). 36 D-4 (n) Narv rb F-.maruddin Krran s/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Krrari, agcd abou[ 53 r', ars ,)cc: Business, R/o. Flat No.402, Indralok Aparrrn.nt; Badara I{i ls II;r erabad.

37. D-4 (o) Na,,r. rb .4.:;izuddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Latifuddin Khan. ,rged about 57 lears, Or:c : Business, Rio. Flat No.402, Indralok Apartrnents, Hills Hy i erabad. -Banjara (Respondent N0.23 to 37 are added as Defendant Nos.D_4 (a) to (o) being Legal represenrarive o1 det'eased Defendant No.4 as per court order d.arca tg.tz.tgis in Appl.N_o.l2Vl95I at Deft.No.4 (k) appointei as Guardian). 38 D-5 Mohanrn Led lrtakaruddin rtran sio. Late Nawab Moinuddowra r:iahadur, Caste : \4 _rsh r . age 38 years, Hissadar paigha, R/o.Toli Chowki. Fh,derabad. (Deccasc 1)

39. D-5 (a) Jarab r .\;u rzunnissa Begum wro. Late Mohammed Iftakarudcin Khan 40. D--5 o) .Ian,b r G'r ruseunnissa Begum, Dlo. LateMohammcd I{taka..rddin Khan, 4l D--5 (c) Narva r K rrmruddin Khan, S/o.Late rttoiru*.a tftItarudain Khan, agcd ageJ rborrl 72 years, R/o. Roshan Vihar, Santoshnagar, H1,dc:abad. abo ut 70',,:ars, R/o. H.No. 1 7- I _365, Asmajahi Tombs, San to ;hnagar,' Hydcrahad. D-5 (C-l) Narvab l,Iohd. Nooruddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Khamrtrildin Khan age 5 ) r,rs Occ: private employee, Rlo.17_l_4/2, Santoshna5lar, IJdi Ba.:a. , Chirrminar, Hyderabad. D-5 (C-2) Nar,,ab X{ohd. Ziauddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Kham*rddin Khan age 45 ,,r ,, O:,: : private employee,R/o. lg-12.-4lglMllg3, HaieezUabanagir, Bar.rdr tlag u Ca, Hyderabad. D-5 (C-3) Nav,ab N,ohd. Naseeruddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Khamrrrddin Khan . age 40 1r's, Occ : private employee, R/o.l g_g-243lA l49.Etli Bazar, D-5 (c-4) Nri' ab \to-hcr. wajiduddin K,an, S/o. Late Nawab Khamru ldin Khan Saidz bad. Hyderabad. ag,: . 5 vlr. Occ : private employee, Wo.lg_g_243/N49, Edi Bazar, Said.rbarl, I-lyderabad. D-5 (c-5) Nau ab rv.ohcr. Faquruddin, S/o. Late Nawab Khamruddin Khan. age 32 yrs, 3cc private employe e, FUo.419/59, Hafeezbaba nagar. Grrl: hrn ,:qbal Colony, Hyderabad. D-5 (C-6) Jana ta l {eherunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Khamruddin Khan, age .36 y.s. O,:c : Household, R/o.7 _2_216, Ashoknagar, .l.akaraLasti, S ecr end riLbad, Hyderabad. (Defendants No.D-S(C_l) ! (a_g the tegat representotives of deteased .being Defendant No'S (c) as oer Court order daTea zz.oizozl in appt.No.549/20t6). 42' D-5 (d) Janaba Shaukarunnissa Begum, nr"rti"fu-r"a Iftakaruddin Khan, aged about 6g vears,.R/o.H.No .i-g_iqAtt,Cf,i_g afi l,un", Abids, Hyderabad. 43. D-5 (e) Nawab Mohd. atUaruaai, fi,rr, ,)"-i"',".lr"fr"mmed Iftakaruddin Khan, aged about 66 years, Occ: Busin.rr, Wo.H.No. f l_i_j[i*|;;0, Bazaar, Ramchard.a i.{agui, rfya".uUua. 44. D-5 (D Janaba Khairunni..u B";q ;i;.M;;;_med rftakaruddin Khan, aged , "'"'"" - about 64 years, Occ: Household, ru". n rian Vihar, Santoshnagar, I{yderabad. (Guardian Md. Abclaltah Khan S/o. Md. Ameerullah Khan appointed as per court order dated 06.03.1970 in Appt.No.tUlOZili.--' 45. D-6. Ahmeduddin Khan S7o. Late Nawa'b Moinuaaowla Bahadur, Caste: Muslim, age 33 years, Hirr"d; p;Gh;li/o.Khanauaglr, a! D-6 (a) Janaba A'arunnisa Begum, wo. Lateihmeduddin Khan. 47 ' D-6 (b) Janaba viqarunnir.a n9"er-, nr" r",. a#iauddin Khan, aged about 65 n*sehotd, R/o. H. N o. 1 6_ t t -23 4, lrages, Coror!, r",il;; Begum, D/o. Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about

48. D-6 (c) Janaba Hamee ffi ;"O# 63 yearc, Occ: Household, R/o. Opp: fu.t,uin ivrr.irrg Home, Saleem nagar Colony, Hyderabad. Hyderabad .unnisa 49' D-6 (d) Nawab Mohd Kirajarvloinuddin Khan, S/o. Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about 60 years, Occ: Business, Vo.ff"iN":Of , pleasant park Apartments. Shantinagar Colony, Masabtank, Uyderabaa. s0. D-6 (e) Nawab Mohd. Nirr*rtain riru'", ii".i"i"?n_"duddin Khan, aged abour 5g years, occ: Business, nl".H.N".iS_i r 37 /B/lo6,Kalapathar, Bilalnagar, Hyderabad. 5l D-6 (0 Janaba yousufunnisa Begum, D/o. LateAhmeduddin Khan, aged about 56 R/o.H.N o.te -2-137 tB t t 00, rur,putr,,.] n i;l;;;;; 52. D-6 (g) Janaba Haseebunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about 54 years, Occ: Household, R/o.H.No. 19_2_l y El rce,f"frp"ih"i eilj."gri 53. D-6 (h) Janaba Maherunnisa Regum, D/o. Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about 52 [rljl;fl!!; ""sehold, Hyderabad. years, Occ: Household, R_/o.Flat No.30l, pleasant park Apartments, Shantinagar Colony, Masabtant<, gvaeraUaa*-

54. D-6 (i) Nawab Mohd. Rafiuddin Kh;;. s;:i;;;;ilmeauddin Khan. aged about 50 years, occ: Business, R/o. Saleemnagar C;l;"y, Hyderabad. 55 D-6 (i) Janaba Nikhathunnisa Begum, nl". L#ar,-")uddin Khan, aged abour 48 years, Occ: Household, Wo.Flat No.301, pleasant park Apartments, Shantinagar Colony, Masabtunt, ffya"*UuJ. (Respondents Nos-46 to 55 are added os Defendants io.D_6(a) to e being the legal representatives of deceased Defendant No.i as pgt Coi), ord", dated 02.02.2000 in 56. D-7 Afsaruddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, Caste: Muslim, Appl.No.73/2000). age 34 years, Hissadar paigha, R./o. Saroomagu., Hya..rUua. "-' 5l . D-1 (a) Janab r B:L: heer Banu,Wo. Late Afsaruddin Khan, aged abou r 5 8 years, Ocr:: rlor- schold, R/o.H.No. 1 6-2-7011, Shankar Bazaar, Gaddianaram, . R.R.lristri,:t.

58. D-7 (b) Jan;rl--r V.c ar Banu, D/o. Late Afsaruddin Khan, aged about.i5 years, Occ: Iou s :hold, R/o.H.No. 1 6-2-701 1, Shankar Bazaar, Gadcianaram, R.R.l )istrict.

59. D-7 (c) Na.,va r .Tahangiruddin Khan, S/o. Late Afsaruddin Khan. agc,I about 34 years. Oc( : B usiness, R/o.H.No. 1 6-2-7011, Shankar Bazaar. Ci addianaram, R.RJ)s';;c. (Respondents No 57 t,t 59 are added as Defendanls No.D-7(o) tu (c) b,'ittg the ligat represenlaliNes o,'dectased Defendant No.7 as per Court Order dated 02.02.2000 in Appl.h-o.73/20r)0 . 60. D-8. Iqbalr-uJ 1in [.han S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, Cas:e: Ir{uslim, age i I ears Hissadar Paigha, R/o. Saroornagar, Hyderabad. 61 . D-8 (a) Navra r l{ohd. Fareeduddin Kharl S/o. Late Nawab Iqbaluddr n Khan, aged about 64 :/,rars, Occ: Landlord, R/o- H.No.16-2-7051N8, Ak,rar Bagh, Mala! pet Il,derabad.

62. D-8 (b) Janab L NlrinLrmrissa Begurn Dlo. Late Nawab Iqbaluddin Khen, being the le gal ;rcrl and representative of Nawab Iqbaluddin Khan. Sr'o Late Moin- ud-l)c nla, irged 61years, Occ: Landlord, No 3-5-78211()16, Ciaf- bunea [orv. King Kothi, Hyderabad. R./o 74 Bank Building. ]vlitcham Lane. Lor.c on Swl66NG, England, U.K.

63. D-8 (c) JarLabr IqlxLlunnisa Begum D/o Late Nawab Iqbaluddin Khan. being thc legal l.eir and rcpresentative of Nawab Iqbaluddin Khan. Sro -ate Moin- ud-l)i r.vla. aged 56years, Occ: Landlord, No 3-5-782llA16, Gaf- bunqa orv. King Kothi, Hyderabad.

64. D-8 (d) Nalvalr Nlr. eeduddin Khan S/o Late Nawab Iqbaluddin Khan. being the legal I eir :r-rd rcpresentative of Nawab Iqbaluddin Khan. S/o i-ate Moin- ud-I)cwla. ared 43years, Occ: Landlord, R/o 16-2-705188, Akbarbagh, Mal..Lk pet. l{1 dcrabad. (Respondents ,\o.61 to 6,1 ue impleaded as Defendants No.D-8(a) to D-8(d) vide orders dated l3-0 )-20;3 in Appl.No.838/2013 in C.S.No.7/1958).

65. D-9. Wajihudc in ti'ran (Died), S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahad.r, Caste: Mr rslirn. age 24 years, Hissadar Paigha, R/o. Saroornagar, Hyderabad

66. D-9 (a) Janaba Fare edunnisa Begum (Died) Wo. Wajihuddin Khan

67. D-9 (b) Nau al Alzrltrddin Khan, S/o. Waj ihuddin Khan, aged about (i6 years, Occ: E usinr:ss, No.75lA, Katedhan, Shivrampally, R.R. Distr:ct.

68. D-9 (c) Nar'r at Aze:muddin Khan, S/o. Wajihuddin Khan, aged abour 68 years, R/o.?. _5_. Ii4. panjeshah, Hyderabad.

69. D-9 (d) Naw'al Ycr sr,rfi-rddin Khan, S/o.Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 58 years, Occ: E usincss, IVo.H.No.l9-3-2 62/215, Jahanuma, Flyderabaci. 70. D-9 (e) Janaba Vic,z mnnisa Begum, D/o. Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 62 years, Occ: F ouse ho ld, R/o. H.No. 8-5- 1 1 /2, U ddamgadda, Bandlagurla, R. R. Dish ic.. /

71. D-9 (D Janaba Sayeedunnisa Begum, D/o- Wajihuddin Khaq aged about 54 years, Occ: Household, R-/o.H.No.8-5-1 1/2, Uddamgadda, Bandlaguda, R.R. District.

72. D-9 (g)Nawab Asifuddin Khan, Sio. Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 50 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.8-5- I 1/2, Uddamgadda, Ba'ndlaguda, R.R. District

73. D-9 (h) Nawab Moinuddin Khan, S/o. Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 52 years, . Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.4-75lA, Katedhan, Shivrampally, R.R. District.

74. D-9 (i) Janaba Parwarishunnisa Begum @ Jahandarunnisa Begum, D/o. Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 66 years, Occ: Household, fuo.Lord Mansion, Lalapet, Hyderabad. (Responclents No.66 to 74 are added as DeJendants No.D-9(a) to (i) being the legal represenlatives of deceased Defendant No.9 os per Co rt Ortler dated 02.02-2000 in Appl. No.73/2000). 75. D-10. Bahauddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, Caste: Muslim, age 25 years, Hissadar Paigha, fuo.Khanabagh, Hyderabad. 76. D-10 (a) Janaba Mahboob Begum, Wo. Late Bahauddin Khan, aged about 94 years, Occ : Nil, fuo.H.Nb. 1 2- 1 -58418, Asifnagar, Hyderabad. 71 . D-10 (b) Nawab Ruknuddin Khan, S/o. Late Bahaudddin KIan, aged abour 66 years, R/o.I{.No . 12-1 -584 I 8, Asifnagar, Hyderabad.

78. D-10 (c) Nawab Yousufuddin Khan (Died), S/o. Late Bahauddin Khan. 19. D-10 (d) Janaba Parwarishunnisa Begum @ Mohammedunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Bahauddin Khan, aged about 64 years, Occ: Household, R/o.H.No. 12- l- 584/8, Asifnagar, Hyderabad. (Respondents No.76 to 79 are atldetl as Defendants No.D-L|(a) to (d) being the legat represenlatives of deceased Defendant No.10 as per Court Order dalert 02.02.2000 in Appl.No.73/2000). 80. D-10 (e) Nawab Mohd. fushaduddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Yousufuddin Khan aged about 30 years, Occ: Accountant, presently R/o P.O.Box:3410, Dubai, U.A.E. represented by GPA Holder Nawab Mohd Khaleemuddin KIan.

81. D-10 (f) Nawab Mohd Khaleemuddin Khan S/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Yousufuddin Khar; aged abott 27 years, Occ: Student, No 12-2-2411, Syedaliguda, Asif Nagar. Hyderabad.

82. D-10 (g) Janaba Sameera Begum D/o Late Nawab Mohd. Yousufuddin Khan, aged about 32 years, Occ: Housewife, Rlo 12-2-241)., Syedaliguda, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad.

83. D-l0 (h) Janaba Sara Begum D/o. Late Nawab Mohd Yousufuddin Khan, aged about 23 years, Occ: Student, No 12-2-2411, Syedaliguda, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad. (Respondenl Nos.80 to 83 are impleaded as DeJendants No.D-L\(e) to D-10(h) vide orders dated 13-09-2013 in Appl.No.83 8/2013). 84- D- 1 I . Badaruddin Khan S7o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, Caste: Muslim, age 32 years, Hissadar Paigha, R/o.Khanabagh, Hyderabad.

85. D-11(a) Janaba Asmatunnisa Begum (Died), Wio. Late Badaruddin Khan. 86. D-11(b) Nawab Naseeruddin Khan, S/o. Late Badaruddin Khan, aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No. 1 -8-506/55, New prakashnagar, Be gr" mp,:r, II-vderabad.

87. D-11(c) Janal a Aneerunnisa Begum, Dlo. Lale Badaruddin Khan, alied about 60 years, Orxr: Household, R /o.Il.No.3-5-782152lAll, King Ko1i, Hyderabad. 88. D-11(d) Janal,a Q a marunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Badaruddin Khan, a!!ed about 50 years, Oi:r:: IJousehold, R/o.H.No. l-8-506/55, Neu' Prakashrragar, Begumpr:t, Hydcrabad. (Respondenls No 85 trt 88 are added as Defendants No.D-l1(a) to (d) bzing tlre legal represenlatives o.r dececed Defendant No.ll as per Court Order dalt'd 02.02.2000 in Appl.No.732090). 89. D-12. Jalalr-,d,lin {han S/o. Latc Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur. Caste: Muslim-, agi.: 2-1 ,ears. I lissadar Paigha, R/o-Khanabagh, Hyderabad.

90. D- l2(a) Na,,r r b Ir fuhd- Sikendaruddin Khan, Sio.Late Nawab Mohd. Ialaluddin Kh:Ln agtxl 54 years, Occ: Landlord, R/o. Hussiani Heights, irlat No.202, IIurn: ynr: llagar, Ilyderabad. (Respondenl n'o.'t0 i-s impleaded as Defendanl No.D-L2(a) vide order.s dtated 13-09- 20 13 in Appl. No. 13 8,',' 0 I 3).

91. D-13. Zainula:idr:e nKhanS/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur,( )aste: Muslim ag: 34 -vears, Hissadar Paigha, fuo.Dewdi Mutaseenuddowla, Hyder-airad.

92. D-13(a) Janaba Y.lusulunnisa Begum (Died), Wo. Nawab Zainulabe,ldin.Khan. 93. D- 13(b) Ta11'rLba E egum, Wo. Nawab Zainulabeddin Khan, aged ab,rut 75 years, Occ: rlorLsehold, fuo.H.No. l7-5-389 Dabilpura, H1'derabad. 94. D-13(c) Narvab lvlr,hd. Abdul Barkath Khan, S/o. Zainulabeddin Khar.r, aged about 65 ycrrs, Occ: l,andlord, R/o.ILNo.12-1-513, Lalapet, Scc-bad.

95. D-13(d) Nau'z b lvkrhd. Fareeduddin Khan, S/o- Zainulabeddin Khan, aged about 63 '/errs, Occ: Landlord, R./o.H.No.20-3- I 1 18, Kaman Shamsul Umra, Shah;;unj. H)'derabad.

96. D-13(e) Janrrbr \ir rnusunnisa Begum, D/o. Zainulabeddin Khan, age,J about 61 1'ears C)cc: Ilousehold, fuo.H.No.12- l-5ll/1, Lalape| Sec-bad.

97. D-13(f) Nar.ia r \{ohd. Naseeruddin Khan (Died), S/o. Late Zainulabeddin Khan, (l'er I Rs . (D-13 F(1) to 13 F(l1).

98. D-13(F-1) Jan rba l{ahboobunnisa Begum, W/o. Late Nawab Mohd. },traseeruddin Kh: n, aged about 6l years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.12.l-512, Mal rboob Mansion, Sec-bad.

99. D-13(F-2) Jan rba l.tiya Bcgum, Wo. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseeruddin Khan, aqed alxrut 51 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.12-1-512, Mahboob Nfa rsic r.. Sec-bad.

100. D-13(F-3). Nlvat N.Iohd. Abul Fateh Khan (Died) 101. D-13(F-3(a) .\znit lh Fathima, Wio. Nawab Mohd. Abul Fateh Khan, aged about 3: years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.12-1-512, Mahboolr Mansion, St c b r,1.

101. D-13(F-3(b) .lairebunnisa Begum, D/o. Nawab Mohd. Abul Fateh Khan. aged alrout i3 years, Occ: Student, Minor, Represented by Gurrrdian Azrn:Lth Fathima Mother, R/o. H.No.12-1-512, Mahboob Mansion, S:c L'ad. 102, D-13(F-3(c) Kashifunnisa Begum, D/o. Nawab Mohd. Abul Fateh Khan, aged about I I years, Occ: Student, Minor, Represented by Guardian Azmarh Fathima Mother, R/o. H.No. I 2_ 1_5 12, Mahboob Mansion, Sec-bad.

103. D-13(F-3(d) Khadarunnisa Begum, D/o. Nawab Mohd. Abul Fateh Khan, aged about 9 years, Occ: Student, Minor, Represented by Guardian Azmath Fathima Mother, R/o. H.No.l2_1_512, Mahboob Mansion. Sec-bad.

104. D-13(F-4)Nawab Mohd. Zainul Mutakheen Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan, aged about 40 years, Occ: Landlord, R/o. H.No.l2_ 1-512, Mahboob Mansion, Sec_bad.

105. D-13(F-5) Nawab Mohd. Ruknuddin Khan, s/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan, aged about 2l years, Occ: Landlord, R/o. H.No.12-1_512, Mahboob Mansion, Sec_bad.

106. D-13(F-6) Nawab Mohd. Ismailuddin Khan, s/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan, aged about 23 years, Occ: Landlord, R/o. H.No.12_l_512, Mahboob Mansion, Sec_bad.

107. D-13(F-7) Nawab Mohd. Zainulabeddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan, aged about 20 years, Occ: Student, R/o. H.No.12_l_ 512, Mahboob Mansion, Sec_bad.

108. D-1i(F-8) Ameenunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan. aged about 28 years, Occ: Student, Rio. H.No.12-1_512, Mahbooi Mansion, Sec_bad. 109- D-13(F-9) Bilqeesunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan, aged about 26 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.12_1-512. Mahboob Mansioq Sec-bad. I10. D- 13(F- 10)Humeraunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan, aged about 24 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H,No.l2-1_512, Mahboob Mansion, Sec-bad.

111. D-13(F-11) Anees Farima Begum, D/o. Late Nawab Mohd. Naseruddin Khan. aged about l8 years, Occ: Student, Wo. H.No.12_1_512, Mahboob Mansion, Sec_bad.

112. D-13(G- l) Mohd. Basheeruddin Ahmed, [Vo. Late Nafeesunnisa Begum, aged about 65 years, Occ:Business, H.No.l2_l_5 i l/2, Mahboob Mansilon, Sec-bad. I13. D-13(G-2) Nawab Mohd. Daveruddin Khaq S/o. Late Nafeesunnisa Begum, aged about 42 years, Occ:Business, H.No. 12_l_51 1/2, Mahboob Mansion, Sec-bad.

114. D-13(G-3) Mohd. Sirajuddin Ahmed, S/o. Late Nafeesunnisa Begum, aged about 3 5 years, Occ:Business, H.No. 12_ 1 -5 1 1/2, Mahboob Ivtansion, Sec'bad. I 15. D-13(G-4) Janaba Wajahathunnisa Begum, D/o.Late Nafeesunnisa Begum, aged about 44 years, Occ:Household, H.No.12_1_511/2, Mahboob Mansion, Sec-bad. 1 16. D- I 3(G-5) Janaba eadeerunnisa Begum, D/o. Late Nafeesunnisa Begum, aged about 38 years, Occ:Household, H.No.l2_ l-511/2, Mahboob /,,. N Ian:rion, Sec-bad. 117- D-13 (G-6).r.yesf a Bano Ahmed, Dlo.Late Nafeesunnisa Begum. aged about 14 yelrs, Occ:Household, H.No. 12-1-51 l/2, Mahboob l4ansion, )iec - b ad. (Respondenls Nc.92 tt lI7 are added as Defendanls No.D'L3(a) to O, D-13(F-l to F-L1 & D-13 - C(l) tt G-(6) being the legal representalives of deceased Defendant No.13). I 18. D-14. Gaziuldirr Khan S/o. Late Narvab Moinuddow-la Bahadur, ag,rd about 76 years. Occ: I-andlord, R/o.H.No.8-2-68 6116lDl2, Road No 14, Banjara Hiih. 1,v"c e rabad. I 19. D-1 5. S'alis rdd r: Khan S/o. Late Nawab N{oinuddowla Bahadul. ar;ed about 74 years, Oc<,: Landlord, R/o.H.No.8-2-68 6ll6tDl2, Road No.1.4, Banjara HiL);. Jyce rabad.

120. D-1,6. FaridL nni;r;a Begum D/o. Late Nau,ab Moinuddowla Bahadur-, Caste: Mr.:slim. age 38 years, Hissadar Paigha, R/o.Khanabag-r, Hyderrbarl (by general power of Attorney holder Nawab Kha ja Moi.tuddin Khan) l2l. D-11 . Lail:u niss,r Begum D/o. Latc Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur Casle: Muslim, age 35 years, Occ : Household, R/o.HyderabaC & Bhopal.

122. D-17 (a) Na.vab Ilhusro Kamal Pasha S/o. Late Janaba Layeeclunni:ra Begum, aged 68 years, Occ: Landlord, permanent resident ol R-/o 5-9-24611, C)h rag :rli Lanc, Abids, llyderabad. (Respondent No.t22 i:; impleaded as Defcndant No.D-l7(a) vide orders dated 13-09- 20 1 3 in Appl. No. 93 8,/:' 0 I 3). 123. D-18. Izza[umissr l]egum D/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur', Caste: NlusIinr, age 35 years, Occ : I{ousehold, R./o. l': dbar:d. Hyderabad.

124. D-18(a).Jan:ba J- yaqathunnisa Bcgum, D/o. Late Izzathunnisa Beg,r6, 2t"6 ahorrt 6() ycars, Occ: Household, R /o. Kakatiyanagar, Nanalnagar, Hyc erabiLd.

125. D-1S(b).Janr ba il:enathunnisa Begum (Died), D/o. Late Izzathunnis a Begum. Begum, D/o. Late Izzathunnisa Ber;um, aged I26.'D-18(c).Jane ba -irrhniyathunnisa abo:rt 5lJ years, Occ: Household, R/o.H.No.l0-2-310, Bazalguard, Mallepal y, I{1'derabad. (Respondenls No 124 to 126 ore added as Defendants No.D-l8(a) to (c) being lhe legal represenlatives of deceased Defendant No.l8 as per Coutt Order daled 02. 02. 2 000 in Ap1tl. h o. 73/2000). 127.D-18 (d) Na,vab lLli Bin Hamid, S/o Late Zeenatunnisa Begum, ;\gi:d 32yearc, Oct : [,:urdlord. R/o H.No I l-2-585, Habeeb Nagar, NamprLlly, I{},lera bad.

128. D-18 (e) Narrab Jrfthr Bin Hamid, S/o. Late Zeenatunnisa Begum, .'\ged 30 yea's, (),:c: Landlord, Rro H.No l1-2-585, Habeeb Nagar, Nampally, H r .Ierab.rd.

129. D-18 (f) Janz ba S .rmihaunnissa I-Iamid, D/o. Late Zeenatunnisa Begum, Aged 37 ;:ars. Occ: I-andlady, R/o I{.No l1-2-585, Habeeb Nagr,r, Nampally, ,,.',/ Hyderabad.

130. D-18 (g) Janaba Hassa Hamid, D/o. Late Zeenatunnisa flegum, Aged 34years, Occ: Landlady, R/o H.No 1t_2_5l5,Habeeb Nagir, Nanipalfy,, Hyderabad. (Respondents No.l27 to 130 are impteaded as Defendants No.D_Ig(tl) to D_lg(g) vide orders dated t3_09_2013 in Appt.No.B3B/2OiS1t. 131' D-l9 IftikarurLnissa aegum liio. Late Nawab irloinuddowra Bahadur, "" Caste: Muslim, age l9 years, Occ : Household, R/o. Secunderabad.

132. D-19 (a) Nawab Ali Bin Sateh Hlo. Late Janaba Iftekharunissa Begum, aged 70 years, Occ: Landlady, No 9_4_g4/99, plot No. el, fat"atlya fagar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad. (:e:!?nd:nt N!.132 is impteasdett as Defendant No.l9(a) vitle,orders dated l3_0g_ 2 0 13 i n A ppt.No. 83 B/2 0 t3 ). 133. D-20. Malika Jahan Begum D/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, aged abour 78 years, Occ: Household, Rro. H.No.23-l_213, Andherigalli, Alijahkotla, Charminar, Hyderabad.

134. D-21. Aktar Jahan Begurn, D/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, aged about 76 ycars, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.22_5-4g4, panjeshah, Charminar, I{yderabad.

135. D-22. Dawoodunissa, D/o. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, a-ged about 72 years, occ: Household, R/o. SRT l9g, chandural Baradari, Hyderabad.

136. D-23. Mahboobunnisa Begum, Wo. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, Caste: Muslim, agc 55 years, Occ 137 . D-24. Raheemunnisa Begum, Wo. Late Caste: Muslim, age 52 years, Occ I38. D-25. Ladli Begum Wo. Late Nawab M Caste: Muslim, age 52 years, Occ Hyderabad. : Household, R/o. Jahanuma, Hyderabad_ Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, : Household, R/o.Jahanuma, Hyderabad. oinuddowla Bahadur, : Household, R/o. Khanabagh,

139. D-25(a). Kulsum Begum 140. D-25(b). Mirzl Baqar Ali Baig 141. D-25(c). Mirza Liakat Ati Baig | 42. D-25 (d). Moinuddin Kharr 143. D-25(e) Sultanuddin Khan 144. D-26- Liakatunnissa Begum Mahal wo. Late Nawab Moinuddowla Bahadur, Caste: Muslim, age 50 years, Occ : Household, R/o.Khanabagh Hyderabad.

145. D-27 . Fareed Jahan Begum Wo. Zahir yar Jung 146. D-28. Sultana Begum Mother_in-law Zahir yar Jung Gdo-) 147 . D-29. Gulam Mohammed Husband of Sultana Begum 148. D-30. Mansab Jung private Secretary to Zahir yar Jung 149. D-31. Shaik Nlohiuddin Typisfto Zahir yar JunB 150. D-32. Willam Ceasar Mohatarm Bashir Bagh Gdo_) (do-) Gdo-) Gdo-) (Benami pattadar)

151. D-33. MaLboct Khan Muntazim Zahir Yar Jung 152. D-34. S1'ert Shamshuddin Khan 153. D-35- Gov.nd F ao 154. D-36. Sreelhar Rao 155. D-37. Jayarao Sambrani 156. D-38. N. K. G r-usu'amy 157. D-39. Dr. rl.N .)ass 158, D-40. Shel zada Dildar Ali Khan 159. D-41. Syec \\'rriiullah Hussaini 160. D-42. Sler Arrinuddin Hussaini 161. D-43. H,r,d :rabad Development Cc-cpcrative Society, Dilsuklmagar 1,62. D-44. Col. Ali Ilaza (deceased) 163. D-45. Syec Al {bbas 164. D-46. G.S. Venkat Rao 165. D-41 . Jagir Adnrinistrator, Govt. of Arrdhle Pradesh, Hyderabad 166. D-48. Secr,;tarr. Finance Department, Gora of I'ndlua Pradesh, Hyderabad.

167. D-49. Hari ParJrad 168. D-50. N4/s. M.,\. Bari, Advocate, (-do-) .. (-,1o-) (-lo) ('lo-) Clo-) C lo-) (ilie gal Purchaser) (Benanri Pattadar) , GJo) G,lo) (illegal P.rrchaser) (Benami Pattadar) (Benami Pattadar) l-rlo-) { -r to-) t-c o-) . (-co) Recc ver-,;um-Commissioner in CS-No.7/1 958 Havi rg tr: office at H.No. I I 3-627,I{osque Road, Nen' Ma,l :pally, Hyderabad- 169. D-51. M/s. B. Shyamshunder Rao, Advocate, Rece ver-r:um-Commissioner in CS.No.7/1958 Havirrg tir,: office at I{.No. I 1-3-621 , Mosque l{oad. New MaJl:pally, Hyderabad. (Defendant Nos51 /t, 52 are intpleaded as per Court Order dated 01.111.2002 in Appl.No.l100, 110!, 1102 & 1103/2002). 168. D-50.Mr. N ohtl. Abdul Hussain, S/o. Late Mohammed Abdul Wal.eed. aged about 32 ..,t:ars, Occ: Business, R/o. 4-114, Errakunta, Kothapet Village, R.R.listrct-5.

169. D-51.Syed tafi(h Sayeed, S/o. Syed Gulam Rasool, aged about.l2 years, Occ: Bus ir.r :ss, IVo.H.No.2-3 -508, Abhay Plaza, Flat No. 3 05, Ar',rt:erpet, Hyderaba,J - 13. (Respondents No.168 & 169 are impleaded as Defendants No.50 & 5l vide orders dsted 13-09-201 I in ,lppl.No.838/2013). 170. D-52. Abdul Sanrad Khan, S/o. Late Hakeem Mohd. Abdullah Khan, aged 57 years. Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.20-3-4I211, N{oosa Botli. Flyderabad.

171. D-53. Mohc . Irz.i zullah Shareef, S/o. Late Mohd. Manzoor Sharcei aged about 37 ve rs, ()cc: Business, R/o.H.No.20-3-393. Moosa Bor.vli. l:Iussaini Alam, Flyderabad.

172. D-54. Ahmed Akamu ah Shareef, Sio. Late Mohd. Manzoor Shareef, aged about 42 years, Occ: Advocate, R/o.H.No.20_3_396, Moosa Bowli Hyderabad.

173. D-55. Syed Azhar, S/o. Syed IJyder, aged about 50jears, Occ: Business, R/o.H,No.20_3_4 l2l l, Moosa Bowli, Hyderabad. (Resp.ondents No.I70 ro I73 are implearled as Defendanrs No.52 to ss vitle orders (:t: dJ 3-- 9 174. D-56. Klradeer Hussain S/o. Late Ahmed Hussain , iged abott 42 years, e_-? 0 t I i n Ap p t. No. 8 3 8 /2 0 r 3 i n c. s. N;. 7/1 s s B). Occupation: B usiness, R/o. LI.No. | 3 _5 / 4 I / 2 678, yousufnalar, Kar.wan, Hyderabad, Chincholi, Taluk and Districr Gulbargi, farno:tut u.

175.D-57. Ahmed Miya S/o. Hussain Saheb Marpally, aged about g0 years Wo. (Applicants No.I74 & 175 are impleadetl os Delendants No.56 & 57 vide orders doted 3046-2014 inAppt.No.593 A. Sg2 of 20i4). 176.D-58. Ameerunnisa Begum, Wo MiiJafarAli Khan, Aged 71 years, Occupation :i{ousehold, R/o. H.No. 3_5_1g2/52/lTB, King Koihi , Hyderabad, 17'7. D-59. Nawab Mir Muzaffar Ali Khan, S/o. Nawab Mir Jafar Ali Khan, Occupation: Business, R/o. H. No. 3_5_lg2l52l1/8, King Kothi , Hyderabad. (Applicants No 176 & 177 are impteatted as Defenddnfs No.Sg &59 vide orders (:t:d_s0:!6?0!4 in Appt.No.ser a ssL oI20i4). 178. D-60. Sri Mohd. Bande Ali, Itetired [iistrictiudge, Receiver_cum_Commissioner, IJ.No.S_l 326/ A/ 122/ l, Janki Nagar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad _ 500 00g.

119.D-61. SriK. Ajitsimha Rao, Retircd District Judge, Receiver-cum-Commissioner, plot No 30,"Gunja Sreenivas Colony, Opp. Vaishavi Enclave pet Basheerabad, Hyderabad - 500 014 (Respondent Nos.t8i & 186 are impreaded as iejenaan* Nos.60 & 61, Retired Dislrict. Judg-es were tppointed as Receivers_cum_bom*isriorers os per common ords dated 02.01.2023 in Aopr(sR).No-9277 0f 2014 (ippr.No.2a/2024) and batch in CS.No.7 of I95B). ... Respondent/D efendafl The Civir Sr- it coming on for hearing, upon perusing the plaint; the preliminary Cecree dated 06-04-1959 and order dated 13-02-'1970 pa*Sed in' Application No 22tt of 1969, Report of the Receivers-cum-Commissioners dated 06-07-201i3, Orders of the Commissioner of Survey Settlement-lnam dated 30-12-1977 arrd the Reports of the previous Commissioners and the earlier orders of High Court mentioned below and the obsen,ations made in the order to the effer:t: That the partition and inter se distribution of immovable properties among the par:ies having been directed by the orders dt. 22-07-1963 and 09-08-1963 marte irr Application No. 335 of 1952, vide Statement lll .attachdd hereto and the scherne of partition of the right to recover the Nuzool amounts specified in statement No. lV attached hereto, having been approved and the inter se distribut.ion cf the same having been effected by the orclers'of the High Court dt. 24-01-'1964,31-01-'1964 and 14-02-1964, made in Application No. 335 of 1962 and the properties comprising of 50 items of barraks at Jahanuma, more particularl y described in the statement No. Vll attached hereto, having been divided an,l partitioned among the parties (vide order of the High Court passed in Application No. 153 of 1965) and the scheme of partition and distribution inter se the parties, to the property called Moosaram Bagh having been effected as pir the order dt. 04-09-1967 and passed in Application Nos. 196 and 201 of 1966 and a sum Rs. 82,500.00 out the sum of Rs. 5,62,472-50, realised out of the sale proceeds of the properties in sched ule ,.A,, to the preliminary Decree, and specified in Statement ll hereto attached having been distributed amcng lhe parties, in accordance with the shares stated in the preliminary Decr,:e, as per statement No. ll-A appended hereto, That this Court doth pass Final Decree in the matter, as per Order dated " 13-02-1970 passed in Application No. 228 of 1969, in the Civil Suit, in respect of item Nos. 1 lo 229 of SCHEDULE - A and SCHEDULES -g,'C, O, E and F of < the Preliminary Decree: '1. That the Civil Suit - C.S.No.7 of 1958 file.d for partition and separate . possession, in respect of the Matruka Properties of Late Nawab Moin-ud-Dowlah Bahadur and of late Sir Asman Jah Bahadur, be and hereby is closed; 2 3 4 5 That the reliefs sought for in Application Nos. 488 of 2012 and 24 of 2024 are dismissed. However the applicants therein are at liberty to exhaust the remedies open to them, according to law. That the properties Nos. 1 to 4 in the statement No. I hereto attached, be assigned to, and are hereby vested in the Plaintiff Sultan Jahan Begum, towards her share as provided in para 3 of the preliminary compropise Decree dt. 06-04-1959 in C.S.No.7 of 1958, on the file of the High Court. That the Defendants Nos. '13, 24 lo 26 shall receive their respective shares in terms paras Nos. 3 & 4 of the preliminary decree dt. 06-04-1959 either in cash, or partly in cash and partly by adjustment towards the amount payable by them in lieu of the properties purchased by them by participating in the public auctions of the properties held under orders of this court. The aforesaid Defendants Nos. 13, 24 to 26 have since realized their shares ( vide order dt.22-'10-1962 in Application No. 362 of 1962). That the Defendants Nos. 2 to 12, 14 to 22, herein shall in addition to the shares received in cash by them as specified in Statements ll, receive i*i and retain in frrll satisfaction of their respective shares, the properties' referred to in the Statement No. lll, ( more fully specified in the order di: 09-08-1963 and made in Application No.335-of 1962 and the plans filed therewith t opiers of which have already been provided to the respbctive parties) St;rtement lV, V and Vll, X, X-A attached hereto, in addition to the specified s harers in Moosaram Bagh, Fareed Villa property and that the Receiver rlo put the said Defendants in possessiorr physical or otherwise of the said properties allotted to their respective shares in accordance with law. The parties h;rving been duly put in possession of the pioperties referred ir para No.5 supra by the Receivers-cum-Commissioners. They shall havr) no claim whatsoever either against the Receivers-cum- Commissic,nerr; or against the other parties rnter se,' and That it is held that no lands are available for partition in item Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule-A, attached to the Preliminarv Compromise Decree, dated l)6-04-1959 passed in C.S.No.7 of 1958, and as such, the reports filed ea rlier being fictitious, the same be and hereby are treated as nullity a nd accordingly are rejected; That the r:port of Mr. Mohd. Bande Ali and Mr. Ajith Simha Rao, Receiver-cum-'3ommissioners, dated 06-07 -2023, be and hereby is accepted 10 the extent of its implication of release Order of the Commissicner of Survey and Settlement - lnam, dated 30-12-1977. That the observations opined by the Receiver-cum-Commissioners in their reporl be and hereby are discarded. 6 7 8 9

15. '.,.i . That it is made clear that the closure of the suit C.S.No. 7 of 195g, does not have any impact on the proceedings, pending before the Hon,bte Supreme Court of lndia. .s That Mr. Mohd. Bande AIi and Mr. Ajith Simha Rao, Receivers _curn_*nr. commissioners, appointed by this court. ,by common order dated ,\r 0241-2023 passed in Application (SR) No. 9227 ot 2o14and batch, be and hereby are discharged. That it is made clear that the parties to the prelaminary compromise decree have no scope to file any applications under the pretiminary decree dated 06-04-1959, seeking recognition and acceptance etc., of any assignment deed or passing finar decree in c.s.No.7 0f 1g5g. That the report of the Receivers_cum_Commissioners, along with Schedule ,A, and Schedules ,8, ,C, ,D, ,E, & ,F, and Statements I to X and XA referred to in the report of the Receivers-cum- commission6.rc are annexed to this decree, and they form part of it. That the parties concerned shall submit the non-judicial stamps for engrossing the final decree. That the Receivers-cum- Commissioners do pay to the parties, amounts remaining to the credit of the suit of the properties of any description, whether moveable or immovable, in accordance with their shares, stated in the preliminary compromise decree, after defraying the court fee, NonJudiciat Stamps, taxes, administration expenses, and any other amounts otherwise due // TRUE COPYII Sd/- K. SRINIVAS RAO, JOINT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To

1. The Section Officer, O.S. Section, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. fwo C.D.Copies (along with a Preliminarv Compromise decree dated 06-04_1gS9 , Schedules of Properties -A to F , Stitements - I to X, XA) ---- w .''. {l HIGH COURT HCJ & NVSK.] DATED:09/01/20 25 DECREE APPLICATION NO. 4,88 OF 2012 IN APPLTCATTON NC. s19 0F 2009 AND APPLICATION N),2,1 OF 2024 IN/AND c.s. No. 7 0F 1958 DISMISSING THli:\PPLICATION NO.488 OF 2012 AND APPLICATICN 24 OF 2024 AND CLOSING THE C.S. NO. 7 OF l1)5:l (-oP"i t ^ &(" t., !^ l,itLi?riIlllY. DlV Ijl Cii . s { --I_ SCHEDULE'A'AND SCHEDULES'B "C''D''E AND'F' _:a-: .t, i r.,lt it,r r, ii r); ,i rlu i-!ri I ijU il n,iIi,r)Jti,r) r, -L rJ L,'V(,Uii Ll l' ii I,'l)-, 1,riii;. iriunj.*Eo1 iio. IttlrE liumbr-,r., Ol.d ,,o. llcvr l1o- llr)nre, ljulti . JloL,r,r. land- rlrea. Ri ti ..) JJhijr)Ll!,t i;:,idcn 1II !iv; L.ur !iJe. Do, .Ea;h hrli lhLsl. .. iroin ie$r, Shar,shahu,l.. 3lr axrs h abl .l ;,';r' ::i{- trri5 ?1 72- 9A , .,.,?5 ;Liar fl:rgl.r 1tlIi Cho(]Li oo. . do. i ltol 14j, 't.A/1 1:n/2, 14ti/ 1, irtlrr;J.or':r .. - iii-rui': .. . ilottr:,; , . ij,-.rrrje, l'eil.iiI, Ic'sJ,ital , icit,. "i r^rc1 i:;r: li,ndi . Lrn clr . J,lltl - (1,

11.:uc,. l,aLrd - I I \ ';l(r-:ill ima.:r'1.:i.i 'a,l lic,o,r::: I .,.:ir,1s. 1'rt_ 1t;iz ,:i[ii.ii].cir., . .. ;i,:rl]t a, riilute i.,r l"ii i iit -ni -nl i1j lilLL. (,d,ilil !i()l-Lrcri 'c'l, -lti!) i) j'i-' a!Lat-6jI , 6i1 Lrll:,Judrr., 'Jni.Jr Lib.ruse I(h.rn i6lr.ro rr Ll t rirr- .. lei]i,i ialece "elcc,r !:j!.L i:oo5i itil}Yr:oo . ' ,.sifrag!lr tehriiya! la5h_ ,irnber'1'rt . .. .u,ijD,'l Dc;la u3rile! t,unB.ila\' ro.25, -o1:r,rlI lio.i6, rolurtr'rr Iluu€Nlc, iihar'!a ;ia.:,l'r :jhddi- iibi.lr.r Dc,r idi CiiY Shair iiurr,; i'iery Guni-d,. ;.oin ]'tr I llutali iadru c'ldin r.hr:n lijuohc iel"mrai llcar lirllro'iah Zeirrbcor jihin r. ..jJier Dlloj l. U,re,ij Onlgri,l,da li_ear Jirhiinoir!o !. Grrss GoilY .j QhanuiJ ;. iuI'(,ll8,jbed .. ;ii jlitxli :jjirhboodni:irr. :. l. a Uul; oJ'i'cbci1 Lir''y'a!fi 10 l3 !?t t,-16 .1.0(rr-.]., . r'r i! 2{) I,,,tr i'l . lr,t:,]. l.:r Li . LJD d. L.,rri , . L:rC , . . (5.;. r r]urlar Ll::utr. ii lji'ri 1 j, t) ' rl, iy-,'r fr'I: l,iLIrd. L,al1. L;url l,)iC. L:rlrl " 1,arrd. f-r,'il . L,lrJ - I iri:.i. L-,t,i - '.,. ,-i1,,,1, Gunj III Divir-i or, 'd' 'Co' .drr. 'i'l' . r.ir,, .: .i . '. I. :1. 'i' '1. ',o', ? - ::i. ,.. ,r i,:, - i.,. J4. ,o. Do lj.., i ii_o. Do. ili - T -iil:j t'1!.' 1-:L*] i&', l:L;'l .r2il5 1_i.1-i 'l:,1: -l{.:-l'' r01? I11:: 'i ll,i 'i11t .l 11rj 1 l-.., i11t/'-l i.111 i '.1,, ll.;,rr ,,.r,1,i,- . . i:.i r. . ;l(o!i. \ ;r 7r 11 ii i'rr -ir :lir:.-t iil i,. ' ;"'- -irair -rir,ru D,_'. }- D,: - ili - t.r- ti . ll,.'. l:. i;' . :1. . :_i 1_ ,):) - -)a . +. D.: . t;,:, ,

1.. ::e. ,',,.), ipl. 1t7.. ,ld. j11. t-j. t1. ,-:j. 4,1 - \). ... / r. ?+.

7.,- ??. lt. t)1 _ |:i. ijtt . Llj.!:r l.:-', Lr: lr .Iir.o;r ., ii. c,r :, i'i!2 --,il,\. ',1'."! 5 i.>1; 't r.-11,! ) ..i,::/il a

1.7a,!1I. t)a'?,/'1 1 .-1,-. - rr /lt! .. ...; ,,..,. .--1'l t. ,,:,i r ) . ,:.!:,!i:, !1 t,ji.;,L::. ;:..1 l. !r ..1-:.! -r; ' -'':i i':' ):':,i: a,_,21 . i:i; - -i;-, - 1..:r:. ll-. r.3 .-:::,jr i.-5 '].,1- 5;11 512 .. 71? , _ ? t:i .. ??1 -,Lrl i: ,, i.i ,.,: i -; . i )1 ,r, , t,l ,,i.. , Lrl-i. I .,,' ,ii . i ui;1i. ; - - tl,,u:e. :I :r_ .,-11't ' a.a', /1 " 5r1 !.,ur1.1.i. t93 . .

1.. :r:, - ur, r riri:, 5f yiuI -.ul _i. -u 1-i. ), etA .,.u.1_: . ,': I J,i 't2 '',all a,r5 i;!j 1:l re!- ,. uL-: . -. i-r.ll:- :.-rll!) . . :,,._.. ili. ir-,. 'ti,: . ai.: - il .-i' ii1,..ri, .. 'l:-,- ' .. 't41 :x. )?. i,t + .-;ti . )o. t,,. :-t'L - '.17 1ll 1- l,i. , i i_l i,:ri ; '.-.,.:.,4 i _i,11 , . .l: ,,ul;i ,l:r'1,- i 1,':,,-, -,r;1(-1r'r- t,,.. ' .. ii-u,. r;; '1-r1. ;Jl" 1J5. -iLl.'1. ta). 1'ta. 11',t. .112. 11i. ''111. -i.15. r.i? - 1i;. - r1 9. 1&. 1?2. -t?3.

124. 125. 1a5. ""; 1-1.1. 1:,3 - 1i5. 1i? . 11e. 1in. i4.-. 1+t . 142. 143- 1,r4. 145. 1+,5. 14C. 1q.9. 151 ;

154. 1r5. -'r. l:,..,. lt. l)o. Dr,. Do. .to. ilt,. .',,. !'rr . ,1o. D,). Ilc. io. i)c. l-lo. lo. t('. jL:. 0,. . i)o. -ic. )::. i;. - ia. iJ.r -

0..,. l)n, Do- iJo - Dt. ,c, Dc, Do. !}-r. ,... jj'i. 76?,?t ?5? /T) .. ?:.? i: i4. . . i6?i1i .. 'i{J'?t/1-) .. tDt,,:i., r;8 ??2 ??1 ?1tl III.Di,,'isior.. . - J37/i . . l?3ii . . .?sl .. ,,?il . f :j; s i;. r.',.,-. ,i . i ,r1_i _ i ,rI. i t ciro,rj loukai-,iu. i:;U al eoo!!l ,',1r1:, Llh:rr: R._,on. l';r:rt . ir. . lcr,'r J. 9.,11 . -\'.:rrsir I't ai: ii rr'r-- .i.,.,:: ,. I, .-, l - i?uo.. .i?uJ:i. iii.:,ra. .ir,o,r. iiclr;r!. iiari;c, iicr,re. ,'i.".rac. !icr!.e, €ri1/ i 1iiil .. 116,-,1,1 ii: li; il . eJ1/4 , nr,oa i. ii"11. 5j1it . !toc,r, i, ii;).1. 11.j1/6 . lii,:i!r' ;:\:i:r. 5i1/7 . x.oil, a'lvi . !1.-, u. Gi't,/') -.--' -JI3ri.i i-;!,rri.i l;,) D--;r,1i i'j'l i'',i: . -,1 r. t,1ii-l t - '.4:;ii1.:. t?.j-.!- ''--ii1). ij1,/1' - ;.;iti')'., - ;ii,'1;.. ij.t,/.i:t - G)1i1;. o3'ii"r". 6j-lt'':-i' 6liia r'])l/i-. 5]1,;1. 63'!,1I '':. trfflt I .-tr;e r ti Uue;r:r]!. ij1 ,tt, .- tic, . i\31/1::.!. i:oi;ab 1J.r1,a) :1,1, r ',i, :|. 632 .. Uulgj.. i.uiai. 5jl 6i4 - - i;ui8i. 6i:, ' .. 'D1,,; . 61i . . j.i'rl.3i, ti3? . . ituliti. (3i .. ;.u1;i. ii:1 . - i.r.t;:. att: . , ;,:n }-ji . 441 .. ,.tri-:.. :1+i: -.. i-,J l.-r. n+j . . ;,.riji. 64+ r.,iil{i. ... i',4> .. ,.ulJi. 64ai -. i:iulgi. o-r. .. iuia:i. 543 . - ;..uljr. ;4r,4 6?i (51 65.,.t-i .. 5i'i!? .. 6ii;_'7'. .- Icorris L 5111.. 1,. .. -. Jiial Dcrr,i,:,.l i.), i1 :i'.. (f ii;tl i, ..11 :, . . (l-t ' :i .l',: Ji .;lr..o. . Dc. 1,c,. ..i:. .),.. i .. ao6,i. .-: - ,11. tirc -DilCiri Rrrcil!. .1,rOn!, :' . :;l!l: '.,-i(jJ, IiI l- r , . i. l)".) -1ali. ,:i..r-j Gi:ir; J-a1 ,i:.ur: .1. t5:. ii. i:. rllv I al ,-rli ;-'11 I ;1.i.- D,1. Do. tra - i).1, I\). fn. ,,:,. i)^. rr, . i)o . Do. D;. D,:. Do. -il-',. :i,l i,;.' -1u:l'i. -:- 1]-i9- J:"h;nurrr..,r lJ ,iv it:c 1?1. Dr,. 1?1 . 1?2. 11-). 1lit- ^:25- 176. -i?7 . 122. 1?9. 1rt,1 . 1t11 . 1t'i2. 1e:- - 1P.4. '1 45. Do. 1;'.6. D^. 1n. ]lo. T !E. Do. 1l-r,9. Do. lcil, D^. -lq1 - ilo, Dn, 1q?. l!l:t. rj^. 'il J . 'n" "95. 1q4. 1q? - lqn- 1q?- V-(). z_11 . ax\, ?-q1. ?-.}l . 215' V)5. 2C? - V)'d. V-^'9. 210. ?11. D,.... )o, it" ' io. Do. Do . ^o. 0". I-)^. Dc. llo. D,:. iA f)o. Dn. , D^. Do . ?1i. D. . ,:a :i-t.r I1,.,i,. i.u.,l.-. . ,i!i? . !i- i;i,u -,..r1-.- i,,.-1 '!:;-. -,!!l]r,.:. .ri',. . ., ?ql -., , .. ?'i:: --. .-., ..?), .. ?4 --. t . - :::1 -... i,:)-.-):Jl ... . .1:ii . . -l-.,J11 -,. --i-: i - ')i - ' llijl' '- ' :.i.'-.. ')"{': ' . .. 'tj _ . 6'15 . A?3 6?e-t1' . .. 1551-4.59 . t- 5 ilor,"--. . - 66,r-a.56; . 5 _1e poc,,ir- -11 iloor. .. 6?0-6?1 . . - a')1.-;? 4 . -r --16 Ron,i,,: . -. i? Dirno,.,-,'. . - 6?b-617 . .'1 t --r 9 i"., "-. - .. 'n q,,^.r c. lioot,. . . ,, - - C?9 t^nr. . . 6sl ?-a. ?o^ q. ' (ro-l . . 74 icoil. . . riu2 15 l.1o,r. -.6d-l-6cj4 . 26 - 27 .t,-tt',nt. ..5U5-5:r6 2it - 2? ,ico'r.. . . Jl loolr, . . J-l 9oon - . - i2 iroor. . . -'{J ilnoo. . . J4 Roori, -,692-691 - :ll- 3Z ':1,.,"t'-- . ' - - 694/1 . . 42- 43 Oifrc .: ito, se. . -.Or'.6a6 .'' 44- 46 Ronr!- - .6c,t?-? 11 47- 59 iloomr'. -.578-5C2 . 6.t- 74 ll"orr-- bir/ ; 6{,'-3 6ii9 59C 691 694 . -59i-C.3 - 79 -9? lloor::,- . .$9-61? , - . 91, 91./'1 Roor. - -?97,/1 , : 94 R,)ori. - -61-,/677 9!-107 iloo,r,s,. .112 . .5r+l_5rr.,1 . llocn. - .b4_?'-643 . 111-11?, 1-17,/1 ti.. jLs. ..?9tt-'lt)a ..1-1,]-'t19 iio,-,nra- 18- C' nor)i'o ;ij D/' r'rD' etc- ?5- 78 .- :n,':l or," i,l ''rl rloo're- . . 797. . . .. ?45 - - fii) - .. :1.1,, .;'r.,r, lcl tI etai (,ide. 1?1 .!d.rr 1,.h. r I . 12+12i Hc,:,r :,. rh6 ao.,u. 1?5 rioon. qi/1 (irtir, -. til eri r{^sa. 41i 2 !, '. 4113 Do. Dn. 4f i: I '. .41 /a .do. .,1c'. . th . .,ir. iirrli. ;1.1, ,. 639 5j"-934, ir6d $1 fle/ tiu nj. 111 1C3 1e9 Lc, 11O ' 1r? /1' ' 115/2 -3 551 r, fi -i .i,l" ,i."1. 3fl?. ,.[ ?,u( I .,.11. L\I- i'i.'i5i.D. c\' ii 2zj, J.r. ieac Dr:-h ).71. l.rciCe ii:lrJtr r-iu t'lJ .i^-- l:\ - 1r rit. ..;:.:lt ,'-h:.: .l!:h 'i!'rj .,(,. ,.,i i,jirla .ii1i-:11'"r ''rrn.i i;4. ;i i,',irrnii, , ..r.'.;,.tic;:li uurl,l ;'i'ii;rri:ei: ur :ir t,iui";.on- l,r:i i' l'ot' !'r+l;:;L-li t, l."a"t .-'|:"t" l;II lrj -1:'(rr;ll''Dol L-il u:.vi:j on f'r''i'':' :'hlk'1"i:ulri ;_2_1. ??-1", 2?5- ??-9. loo!-r. Roon. Rcons. Iodfl ,rch ; l ;a i:'ches. L:o l l,rni Lrn'l L;ni I iti+ . r.rt, . l"(. iar i. ,-r.i(, i IU nler r.l,lell ''i th lievou e ioarl)' t.l;l,itrl1 ::l:h idol' Ji ' ao tr r r11i l.+iir c.,,-r_ t i.. u ajol r,..nor. \aidrr.r':..- -.DZ l''i,ili ' :oru iiI'1. . ll:iiioir';ir3lr'!'unt3h ,;at,r., IiJ',laedah' i.:r..i, i.irlir!!"1i' n-:;ir'li'lr.nc' !''.r'! it :lu h j rrn4" ' -.i,r .JltJrr iiltit. i,:ii. ! r-r(':' i i'i]i-1'r'rrn' .l3rd'i;;::i-'. :,ohl l,:"J ii:€:r' ,..ilraj- ;' r 11'' ' , ,L ]1r -!iir:. ibit' .uiirl,t.i. Y el I :i!':u ot a ' Yeruu;,tt':lc ' ;.D1 lhii fi. ,rbJi,rsl!dl' "' Ilai .-.,r'lind''n ' I'io.'a:,n ljol"l}.i ' ?-ac. ,1?. l)). 2l''-- " ?J? . ?:.?,. 2Jo " 24f;. ?1)1 . ,4?. 2i!+ - 2.4". 2t+5. ?43. ?+9, ?1_t . 2-'.-n , ?i?. 254. ?_51+- i.-, .- - 'l .-) .,t ,:_ Jj'- I I I I i I I ' f. 4,1,D rr' / 1"tr't-PP'I -zr!;!,,yi fil*r-l!#; -,-r' -'t 1i'i'111;) ^,';', .,,.'.. t . .,,rl|-i-i3l:::, i'r .'L< i'!.,,.:..-:.-+;: '7'.).! .,.t". f i/(l , +71,t:u:l,iu. k t,,,., ('\.-i :;j t '- tr:) ' ,.,.i i_-- : : i!; ui r>tt) a I l SCIIE'UI,E B I,:IJT O-L]r PROPIRTY TO BE RIjIIINEN BY TiE' AI{IR-E-PAIGaII. sl. llo . ?Iop erty. lleE'rarks.

1. !:.j.gah House, Secuiderabad-Deccan. 2, 3. s hecr tsagh lalsce, Hyderabrd 5, Ura 3.-S19rr 'l:''r: ?ir l-. tsung:Iov,r, Hy(leelh'xdi . '/,)L\::414rLY+5 .. )_ i..l i I f I ) i I l J L' -1,;;'-... SCI{EDUI,E list of ProPerty Mohenneo. i:aiqudd,iD \' .1webz 1da i{o . PropertY ReI0arks .

1. ?, tr.

6. o

10. tl. Subzi Mundi MoleL tio . 17)2/4 -do- -do- "?r/+ -<1o- ?76/4 -do- -do- -do- -do- -d.o- ?79/+ 2W/4 2A1/4 Teekrlgud.a T,fnds exc 1?. 1). Gaddi Annarrn -Surv Moosaran Bagb' HYd 'gt-.t , i::.'' t Nos. 5 (Moin BaBh) , and 74. 1, t16/2 -- Eurvey No s . 61 , 66 ar.d 67. I a-..-. "rr # (i L,ist ol Prtrpor'ty in-f azada Mohd- f,utuhrddin =1,r :.'.5t! r: 2

1. First.Iloor No. It::]si tr[Bitr J: "ti I di ng. - -do -- - -co -- No.

4. 7 N 0.7 No.7

7. o o I0.

11. 72, t1. 14. 1,5.

18. '10 ,n. l. za. --uu -- ,t^ .-.,10.-l - do.-. - .ic --. -- do- . * do-- -do-- A^ -do-- -- rl o:- '- rlo -- .-- do-- .-- d o-- __,lo_- '-- utl -- lio. 7 i1 c; No. I-o N ]i ]rl o Iio li^ No. No, Ii c.7 No, t I. t -<i-::::=:=== asi guda,Park lano, Sccundora bad. -dc - -do*. -do- -rl o- ....io- -dc- -do- -do- -do- -d o- -d o- -do- -do- -rl^- -do- -do- -do- 1t'F -dr- -il,.r - --{1 i- ,il -do - -do- _Co _ -ds- :do - -do_ -do- -do- _do_ -do - -do- -do- -do. -do- -do_- -dr: -dc- -do- -,lo - -do- -do- -do- -do* <G- -do- -d o- -d o- -d o- -do- -ds- -d o- -do- -d.o- -d o- -do- -do- -do- -d o- -d +. -do- ., .I i l. n! r, list of Socurities ( i-ncluding ill.t :,'.tt.:1 to Hissadarg. of tho Anlr ). S.No. Nano of S': ========.'r===n4= FIIiAI{CE IEP I.. J Per cont loan . . .[nountBs. Rouarks. 4,15,000. Intorost not irr clurlod . o 1,

4. 2t -do- M -do- CiSH. -ll:,ii ,:\ 12,96,' x,w - 1,000 JAGIK JTIMINIST .,i:j J \ i-do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -uu - 1 ,01 ,700 .. 4,100 2, 50,0oo 5,000. 50,ooo q

7. o J Por cont loau Pro-1{ctes iiYdera lriotional Sa ving 50 sharos of }lah 500 ltarss liydc'ra r$iIR-E-P ro' 3,lfl fiil,kf'Ei"

9. I 0 r^ }l S. Raja Pratabgirii. trir. Rasho(, d 3. (h

11. L2. f I .? I 1' TB)n /- 5,1j,1.11 2,40,000 -do- -&- -do- (t s1. lvo . t. )

1. +.

10. S:ialro]]ent of Im.n H -ss:r(la.rs . N1me ( f ]\rilding, tr[ana Bi.gh Eqber Mr.h3: Shadi Kl.an[, JeY/ahar E1::r.a 204- 204- 204- 204 Bafa Kha n1 trangaen H3.v,€ e Ii ' (cEtire bui I ding) 5 Saroorn. Strr' Saioorn:g3r JahatruEr' Pa.l.ac c 2 421 t iahanun. P..l.ace t2, t Akb3r B: gh !'o lj- ToIi Chowki ' c"t{ P { :fl' F crty occupied '5y i. re Na-r,re of occuDi.nt. ,=SL. ed-un-nis:r 3e6u: ajtrhc b a t Be3un Satre ba the Iste ladly Be a:r.d hc irs Bhaudd.in rc}1n B..hnd.ur iila j ibuddiD tXr.an B3br.dur -A}lnadud din IGr3n BahadLlr .TaI aluddin Ehan Bflhtrdul Zainalbddin - Dt,fendant i.b n Iqbaluddin l(h]rl Bahadur d.ruCclln L1:r.3n l:iai'l aclu x Bczun Srh' bl vrii c . b IAt a,C l u I:.O1II i!.Il-ir. \ l.,rnnise late I{aYI n-un-nj-sa Br,'8uE S:rhebc" 'rj'-nisc. B':gulr vitc of lrltc b Tftekh:ruddan K rrr' I i .ra ;! i. '.a:':, I a) I ; ( tL" s Magicc-'Ja6irr B i dar, 1'\ !.fAlo,/ici i - / / , E'' '..i:- 1 I ; Il l. t: .r. i lFt ,, l ..\I ' , -..2 - -rf) x !--/ -,,n 16T ,(IE ! . PITiA ( *rS l i ;g: r-g:ii:'.- - - - .'t'' 't' uIc lAr ,.<4 ------7r2i-- _/ S$AE a) or ;i PI,SINEITF USDER rASSD VILI,A. , I,gc Bt:Lon Bonsrtss;

5. 1 3-1(l 26 38 TJ iJ E:. tralran-Nura y1sa1 GunJ Bolanrn Bolaruu Shamsabad. trot mentlon? ln.Sebcdulc rAr'bnt nsntlored para (e) o '!bc docrc c lD l, I --I o- J"lr, '"--ts h,^* -t.1 L/n-z--t,Za t4 ./ REOEIIIEB.-coxl[slsrctrEls - l 2 15 L4 15 ,1. :2. :., 4

1. DAIIEDt l{ E ST.AT Irft1 On ?ROPEBI . ?ABA (5) ol tltunolpal truDb€r 1 -;--E;;---- $efp-- f,o;cf '** Sehcal- G' E]"c { 5:_ 29 18-19 2$ 86 2 15 L4 15 L. --- 2, s. 4 1 i l I I i I I J I I I i :: ,t I DTEBDI s ---.-. __,/q. ./ "., ?L,AINEIEr trmEB MBEtsD YII3A. Iaaetlon Bcmarks. b &.iw .o. t tralrela-truDa 6"11 GunJ Bolarun Bol artrn ShanaebeA. fot ffintLoac la.Slohrilulc rlr ht mntloueil lD Biu:a (E) ofi the {ccrco i. --t - o., J "tr"-^-- ts Lr ,. BEoETTEB-OOmtr,sIosEIEl I d f ABEEP (,lol(not(, c0-.:qlqA @ (o PP{-t : = r t a Cra c) C) -t o t9-il O) o!o Hoc,lltrotM o..:-. EoS$SaUs 5 lF EFEFFFP gdde-s-B'B' = .44 \l) Il-l,) tDr) t, ,i t! r-r . =3 Bii 8.[t 'd B E crt l', iL tL c }( ir. t( Ir P liE E'[ e xli E ,2'r4't.: t\,(, o E I Al I (:) i36 o C) d, o'c N I Fr\, Ao FFF+$lEiI E 8Rs88858 td uldu & EBE Er G P ii. pEds tuE e 6 Eit * otrg'r EE' FFEFE'g 6 E E 3'g *n q EE -Fttoi *thSo e x F o 8 oT o I N & $rgllE; 5tsssss ssssss; rgsgg$t c) o I N a iI! (a +o o ito o F 83S :FJ 3lr.Ciss ;'EE , l-- tl @lr )(a oq)p 'e' ( f Z<Do. (a(r- tt* o @ 4 *o z rifnFrStco o (D o Eto 4 i tJ F6 q{ o PJ o FJ Up' o o H @ o FI E Ho @ FJ .g U p- o o FI, F o .t o p o P ol, E o I B o @ q t\, (J1i .l I I I I I I I I I I I Iol I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -n -l-!i t d clo E F', 0, ri E'b o tl @ P rytd . (D()FcEF+r 'iJ0Er ,co t-! o cq (o IJp F o U N o o FT o FT 4 I o E E @ c0 (o I I I I I t. I I I I I I I I I I i I I a) + F o 5 z o i{ H o c o U o FJ o I (Dt.crbl<+ o E o H t:_. o e -l .I Or :l t\) o I o|o td tdDO PO ,OE N B p Iats a9 I F 5 t F I I t I I., C/r t I I I I I t I I ,5I I I I I I I I I I I I I (,lt I I ('r \: I i" (^ Fot e(O -il -: I[lF Clro { Cri ===a s$ -i, o, o A N T9 @ q,o OI Crl 111 C, t,1 olFC,lrijH avl\,llcoo @-:otlO .3pF.N$$F.s (olo(o(o(o(oro.^ .o@-iIon(,|FO!Ii I'c tu \l A'FJO (o -.:a tsF,(,r @@\:i; tsa$E A(, O(c| ,a E' -1 E = .=.1 ,2 .z ta, 12. E = t =_ ,= a U )a4,, I F I (Do "-FF #If .# * 6 Bo o @ a< tr. .+ =) !=ta = =:a r.= = /= ,' -= E .= .=.=,, a tttEEooPU*.a= B3B t!ZP.oB.0q o, xi*.B 0, o Ft F o 4+ F (,= !-9 I .L! Ioo c.-.= r )z=) )=)E,=!=.= = Atu F^ lor I S r!. f '. . lt0r or or cit ot9 = , (,A O(ooo @ u t F = =) = t -, =, , c) { (n E H o I N Io H OilFAo o(D6c,! 88388 3 bgbb EsssssE B bseSbbb b So' !4o oc)oc' Boo a\] c5 4,18 t= )t ,2)aE,=)? E,=r= e =) ,=)=ra,a)= C,l N BS !EO o)otON = = t\]tsoor II tToo oa9 t\) I o \, I Oto ) E = ) t=)=/= = =l TO ?aoo PP, o) Gt[-do FJ@o P. (D * I I I I I I I I I I Ilo I I I , I I I I I ,l(o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IF tc) I I t I I I I I ! ( a s Q o,oo o -.J O. C,l lE cn o3cn (,lcr(, <o@ -: (,CiI(,C,1 Or (Ji lF Ol (, (, (, t\, Fl O (oo-.r o) (, F:o@{O'l OiitN @,cc0 otr(, -il -I o) O (i ot a,r O CA Crl (r a\? P rooc0 o(o@ coc0 (,lF -t -{ -{ -.1 (OG{tG) a;z=, 1=A =) )=)= F =) E H o (D <o @ >Hs lFFrg !r_ =-u o ,= :iJ E.NH'F. Po.o Or \l tI O) N No o o o =llc I Ot o ON \6o\ Odr o I Iq) o g =F EflE EE E =.9 d p. trtrts ets qi -(h (, P(' 6 ,{' Fltra (DeHEPp I I I Itst ''l 'l \r!1., lt ('l I | . it ,l Itsr t. t I It 'l t t I I I I lC,t Io o o P O <) o O F o.roo C'o Fr O I I o, r€aE+E o :I I\) O) I o) { c, No I I o OFc,A fJ\:N(n OC.] (,O =t =) ,2,= E = \, a--{, ,= ,= =l o C'I =)= =) E)=/- = a9 a9 =lo I P f\, Ifo, H I\] l, (D <) I 4,, I F" I I I I I I I I t(, 'I ,I 'l,I 'l t I I I ,l l.l ll _.1 | l. tcDt ,lrl It I | <ol II t I I I I I I I I I I t 'l IHI t. Ot Iirl I t I I I C c,t- @(o ca o]cococo Cc _a O, C, @@Co (! d) iF (',r i\) F o {-{(o@ -t -.1 -I -nOtc,r -l --) -.I -a \) o N)ts O FPPO wHO(4 Ct P Orq Ot @F-{ a0C)ts ts r\) -.1 o -a ai \] F(, c.J to =t1? @ N o) I I N o o i9 I I i> (D5 Fr(D'tn Hcto!t tsurdztdf) S.EEP&S E Po O 5o o FB,PFTF F!: PH r{(D oro P Or @ H X Z rr'. les&g 3N ,J 'J (ot\)P llo(oF I I o(c o)ll HCDOr |\)F -o @\\o) a\)tsF-n!t o>O) O) o I I o, P [d td Oor (Dd! 8., # F EE 3 E 'dq c o o o H at:4o Po ECC tr F al] -n I Or a\) N (,rl @ o N I a, I o)o B o p soP a P. <) (o (i I I c,> |1 rdSG' o 5p =FJ O B <r€ O P. E] O FID @ C I O) c,lo o o (n (o o O o (, -- c. g) C) o t-o t, (,r hlcD(o (,Gr(, O-.toCo o(, oo ol c, Al C,(nA -q\\ o)acll C,l\: a\foo Co N oct (n(, cr) oo ooo OOOC\c) O(fO..ra\ oo066 (r!(, Oo o O 85 .J r'- c!O:l O, orPO o: f0 (oP l-a(cl d, ,i tsOr (o (Feoo o rF o ooJ ao c3 Oi E c0 c,l a\, ol ,1, 5 E,rF L!llcnr I I q o otrl. I O(J) 19 coF l{ Ol5 Oi O) I I o) I I o, II II It9 I t-! II | .l QN I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I i I I I I I I Itu I I I I I I I I t. I I , I I I I I I I I I I *a t--- -- t\) -.t I(a I (o ( l-?;' o tsP PH o{t\, ) to co oo_,il ot oo(,lF HHPoo o ol t9 F tsoro (o @ o(ocD-n (o(oroto9 o(rlF(nt- I I Or o: cl (\, o! ) C,l(, @@ cI (Jr rI q. gl (n (,lA gl cDorN (,r OIrtr'F'ts o@o-il I9lFl}A olAc,rat o l. ol RP(tl !l PP , ,== t,==, Fo Ol l}O CD\or :O,P o -t- I 19 Fo&r HFtr& P!t H B @ B 3) EI @ Gp .- r= =/ =r =, -!ts =al && Nt0 a\? t I I o(I) o, N I Iqr P EF 0\ o) IF Iqr N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I c,'| I(, I I I I I I I I I , Ct eFgtEiH 8888irb \lu.e _s IU (n <oO .'ri ^. << E== g, <tr Or- l- Nh, 11, c,rlo o N No ^ =,= =l I IT I t'l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I (o c0 I I -t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I o ,J'q, o 't:'-p r:(, o o 'Jr ) ) ) F 8 8 o .n FPH1. IqNNN r}'NPO .ss33 P u O! I(, A t! (l p o p =. o 4 p P E C,l I -il I Or N ff*E'EE.' coa,Fp, Frp EEodoo_o t\] tt(ote llor or (, (, @oo or or @@ Crro CJl Or N N I I(o I I t\9 rr5 ' r-l 6 . i AF. o l{Xdlu 9E pa EHFB d E,- . trH o . s - &E E 3t E (h9l . l'@ & oB (D .tr @D D H Ho ?P =. = ? =. =, A) Up 4 Elo -il oF 'oiro @ t\, H o @ 8soooo65 r\, -:AocI o 6 Bo 6 o PFlJ FC)uo6ooo 338 a\, 8 C,ro E AC I P Ol t\, ,-r tr t-JP HE.t -+ Ho trc)oa o o \ t t =) =) =r = I =\: I O) t\, (o l.HH*h ts P l: -{ qr Ol '1. I I oo or dr -:ol (, or ah \o6}.Pcl A II { 'I I {I I t I ! t !I I I I I I I t t I I I I o I I(, I I C) t\l t6 F 't4 E F F -{ I =, or I Or (.ll a o0 Ol t\, t\3 @ I I 7I A I I I n I I T I I Iq, Ot I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I ,I I I 1 I I I ) I I I I I i,i (- H = =/ I t\? t\) r\) CNts lF AP Ot: HrIEgE f,if,rlg H o o 3gE*lEnEfF 3;*iinstrf o I P o I 8 o o --,.q-.. or o CAo Ioo o 6o oi.: t, c0 NI '.1E3 A3UC <, o) f,J t @ I O) t, t0 t I I I C,l I t Ii I I I I I I I IAI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -t I I I t I I I I o Itt t\: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -J ;E i i ii i.i oFi i ; i t !, I-t I h) I I I I I I I Il{ I I I I I I I I I I Il .t I r I I I,i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I @t .l I I I I I I I I (9t\,ro @{o tsNr\1: ooN E F H TA P t'co (n UH Ffo HB r$it!to N ts(g =: :) t. : a1 =t 2t =', =1 =t = t\c 'tr .o t9 P o! o! I CN I t\, r-{ r-r{ D^l h ro- tt plr!, p+(, EogF!Ftlo IJ LN,-rxts vvP}'P ()o d f0. !0 ET r-. F I.o I OrI o t9PPCOO oo€,!ooo6 EE Ol 8 E ,= d o (, L H ti. u hH H E 8 8 E8 B o, 9. o, OP o [D Ft o. t/) (htd to d' .+ trd o 4 ) o 6 Elo H O c..} a! O .E 4rJ+. ,0Eo = ID =CEH o'4.40 IP. o I t\? or{oo (n t9oo o! c,l @. GTooo Io E.u E{ td td. uH B E s 5'5',5',8 fD O. q o o op qPfsfPf !o r-{ rt - ED 4, 4. 4,9 fo- < (nl E, n o o 6m r., F q .if . . 0tsFO trFroorrlPH tt E . . or- t o.E.o,.G> '. r., t-, i F(hP.P, p T\,Fts (o(,r# -il =rltOro|Or NNN 'il , =. = -q rb Crl (,l t\] ooqiir.-:o ooobrcro lllrrrOOOOoo 1o -o.. cr-- P o o -iI '',ffii.,-st.*#*. t9 N C,l I o I o, t0 6,o, Or ro ;;(0 tu P Eor t\' I Cl t9 @ I I I(P N rl. I I I I I I I I I I I I I t. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIt l@ I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I t--:-., o -t ! t ilritiI col l.lll llll,It, l.ot t. I Pr I ..I I rl t. I F\ o U o|i (\? t9 U Ff, a h AI C.3 -: I T9 I Or(, ffff;glfgg,ari iiIFEE,rralfH,$., e SggEFr;rF&iso t' -F9.,=FHF:; . E PPs "roo*3 ,, =. S i;,:.F =j =, =, = t . ETFO U H QT E4{(tr PF t\, tD I a9 I (o (o 0rq) F o, I(o I \ot o, .L I O) o F. I I I I II(9 I I I I I 'I I I I Il(, I I I I I I I I I I I IIA I I I I I I I I I Crl A H o, OrH o I Iq) H Pl Crl A@ v vF, c) I I Iqr 1- o o I I I I I Itot (o I .\ I I I I I I I I.t t-- .I. t.!{ I I I t I I I I I I I , t I I I I I I I (o @ I It I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I IProl. I I I (, tsFl (,H '** PO or tt H P Ot cI -it I .\] t Or C'I t, . E F -!J o Ft P rF P -it I Dr I Or F I9 |.J N.i l} o l.t ts.\I P H.it IP .9 I C'I F.r H u o t4 t}H oH. Glo aB FB 3 g F(, Pg {a r; B BE . fD x @b' i,r tsH qr.d 5. rcB$3tF +*'6'= B EP P o !'r gB.x Hp It g . F9 7 4 sH flsflggggggg I 1 2 4.4:4. 7 ? 9 r-i o o o o.. ?93e9 s a F;' S I q S Q, e s e ," E 5 g-5 @FEF, ..i H 14 t--t I I I t I I |. {9 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I t I I I I I I I t I I I I I Il- Il. I I I I l} I I I I o I CD I I I I I I @ ..-)-u-!:*, ._ . ,' li'i{.lgffi.;. j4ill#. :\ = : =, = ) = c, o + F I I (n o) -.: -n I I o,e l\1 o, I Iq) o, (o Or ;-ql I(o I ..Fftr --, =i =,

1. =l =r = , =r =l =t :.r =i =) = { * . .t - .h.i't EI q I I I I I Irco I I I t I I I I It(o I I I Il,.ic l.- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I U F '^H lF 'I o, I tJ E FJ .C{ B E F ^ I I\) I o) ^a*^j UIF Oi t\' U H o 6 r: Qb EE o r I F a I I a\l I o) @ ..: H Ot(, tP t\) I Cr C'I ^ldHu,ldU.td ttrPPHHP tFO O o O O o o<+<i<t<r F ad414 '.o ql o o HFI60Frts . tts (, Orohts o o to }- rr =/ -) , =/ a Ioto o 5-5 Ho ;l -6-'o <o t\? I I Or =; =. :- = Io o @q, Or cD N I I .rl jff! E+ g of. H I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 I C)o F @ at) Ho4 HF, O- b) F E H o h -a C'I { IP T' I q o o Ep 'tr P P U@ tr F lrgPo,tr D(DA, l'o EO lo ci |j E o I @l-,i t. . ",. ti.. ',sqs#' Y . '-i., . ':r -\. 6 ;iS..:1.'- o Xo -i -: - l. It | 00 I E \ (D I I A I @ I I I I I (ot I I I I I I IFIor t I I I I I I I I I I ( ) k of PffiY. !! salctloneal W order - Dt.11-1_5C FTB,II::- s t UOOO_OO ?. 3OOO_00 5OOO-OC 3OOO-OO

1. 1. DefeailaEt 2 2" Defcadaat g OOOO_OO g. Dcfendart 4 4. ncfeudaat E 5. Dcfsadant 6 6. DcfcEdelt ? gooo-oo 7, Dofaldaot e 3ooo-oo 8. Dcfsad@rt 9 goo.-oo 9. Dcfeadaut 10 A0OO{O 10. DofeEdart 11 AOOO_@ 11. Dcfeadaut 1p 3O@_OO 12. Dcfor.det 11 Sooo_oo 15. Dcfendaut 1E 5OO0_OO 14. DcfeEdant 16 30@_OO 15. Dafendna.t 1B IEOO_OO 16. Dofendant 18 lEOO_Oo -6t'/s 1000-co 1000-00 1000-00 1000-oo 1000-oo 1000_00 1000-o0 1000-c0 1000-00 1000{0 1000-00 1000-00 1000-@ 1000-00 500-o0 500-00

17. Dcfezrl mt 19 1EO0-OO

18. lcfonilalt fg IEOO_OO

19. DafEaal&t 21 . 15OO_oo 1

20. Dofentl&t ZP 15oo-oo q....ipg j,,i ---------:- '49500-00 o ..72 &. '+o di6aI a! ,| Or !. o--t _a. -1 6 5000_00 5000_00 5000-00 5000-00 500o-o0 5000_00 5000_oo 5000_00 5000_00 5000-@ 5000-00 5000-o0 5000-oo 5000-00 25 O0 -00 2500{0 1000{o 1000-0c 1O00-00 1000-oo 100o-@ 10@-oo 1000-oo 1000-oo 1000-00 1000-00 1000-00 1000-oo 1000{o 1000-00 500;00 500-00 500-00 25OO_Oo 5@-00 2500-00 500{0 2500-00 5oo-oo psoo-oo 1!199_9c 16500_@ sz5oo-oo J,ttr-u-.^^rSltr EEI ur vpn-coulcss I0{ERS. i$#. ;..-: C s !t{ Statenr- nt No.III of prolerties partltl-oned (Zo itens) I Si-!o.of s cb.e dui e IItr Neuno of S citodule NEEo of properW BoBBTks L. 2 P8rt No. 1? 80 81 .az s L2 5 L29 o L L6 154 156 160 115 ,1 15 155 L57 158 159 161 L62 163

123. L24 5"

11. L?,. 73" L4" r5"

18. 19"

20. 26" A A A A A IL, A .q- .[ ,\ A A A .,t A d 4" Rangeea Eavo]-l & Ir easury Eous o Uashal Kh ena Mulg1 MulSl MuIgl Eouse T.hnly&t 3 sgh Akb af Bsgh Kothar Tamo erat Bagh Saroo N agar Joh ornuma Khana B egrr Mutel Mu)-gt Mul-g1 lfurSl Nlaa-ki-Eava11 & tr'a:'asrr Kb.an.r G at e )rlr: I 4! lturgt UUJ.g.I i'!o,191 lfuLg1 Eouse Ilouse J x,[ss-^,,"tsh$- .t4- BNOEI VER-CO Id tr SS IONEN,S a (o tJ o Ft o 5p, P o o @ tJ FI, o o tJ (D E 9. B o -il tJd o A E o Or \J o o P (, t <r (D B .i -il Or tJ tD o l-t tJ h tJ F o l-r tJ a0'h (, l\] a9 a\,o)(, O,A F(n t9N t9l. wao ri @ -.i c)(o 8E a\) tJ tJ@-oFr, Ft) bE 4Z ol r\, (, Fr x 44 -{ .r, tl,4 !.d H r'd ,.j rc rc t4td 44 Gr cr q) O, -ir -t (o@ 44 oto, H H\J 13B 4,4 Oo (O{ h, B o o o E o r-t FI, -I I l0 FI <t o o (o I E l"l <f ?o I h H o (h =(D td Fd a, &8 F I TJ'Oq P Hrr an .D8tr, =F F 3F B F S-P &ts cD5 E H. !) H ,B E o FJ IJ p l\l td, F E a d ,R rJ F(aor ll G- cI oFr ooc, r- 6' a. E& l, EOEE or '6, ,He (r, f =E h6 C'' O) *< i! ON PI r-. Pl 4 l0 H o o F. P- B 5 Ep U F p. o U B t, o I- !o B 0c (D s 'Do P. E t! H o o (, r H E H F o 4 E Fl o o Ot i. a t,l (lr (rl OI @ (, (o o B &' 5 (/ll E: El Fii I I ro r i i ITr I I I I I l-l i'I i I 'Ei I I <i .li i I rri- i i i.,i iri F r eldl I .+r4 i E I 9Jo l. I r I I I Ir.tF II IP, r rldtsldlai t i"igFESi S Fi(DFri 6 !'I i i 3,* I cr ii&3 iB Il t: 1.d i i i.'3 i I l:'1 iE iil-ltHi ii"lo ltliD lc, I E l+ l-l ,5 l. t! ! | i i= iilig!! e iE liirfti.,ii lll(Dtt!ritiii rriYii rllr-{ ltllltillllt lllllr liilrirri iiitti llrllt a C No U o E o t\) (\) <o tJ o- o B o N tr.i IJ f, F o tJ o t ') tJ(, o E o @ cI$ tJ IJ t-t t-t88 alq)5tr f.^ Fr 'il cD Crr o o B o P U d' FI E o F rF tJ o I o r\? l5 t\] i \, a) Cil C)r rJ P PH PP co CO -n o)qt Su b- td tslJ c'l U (0 H o B I rdX fo rt |:lco td' 5rd P{& Erv B P (,. a- (,__ D ?2 EI (' l/-\<- H 3 ,d I c)o H a o7 $, l.' r4 >4 8!r- i- (D(! Or! N<) aD(o (>rr o)r t}lP o 5I-1" FTH ,BS > tdH IJH3** F FI t9 t, bd to ro 14u) cr.o 4ry tsc, R. HFr Fo E I 5L/ trF' tD E I It tJ o a o a p. o Fs l!otr.+ $)o k 0qtr, aJ J ! q D DI * D D I 1 4 l-J o 0 H Or I Htd =gBR. t-c c, tsovl ,4 o.+tva" E !i F! F FH, PtJ. r{9 o P e l-J F It 00 P U H o o c, ts,r: !o ,s tt H tr +F l-, d 5o6t .+ p@ '"rR F r-t o d\, EEF E (DFd trE E I 9BH }(^; f0 -, b Ft o o Cr F =tl E E (D P o o hJb EE -n qr €. ri o r+ E) Hdo(!.n tt b)FC5k b,< r/l ty Elb PFt, U) F{ p6 c! Fj & (! F B P 4<a I I I I o o H PH Htr P r-j Td(EE o rJ HO' HPo. <torc,o .! 5!) I I E p H (o I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I c, L L I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L r\ Stat€nent No.IV of Nuzoo1 Ig1d6 (tf itens) S.No. S.No. of gchofulo ll1fl L" 1 2" 2t9 2?.L 224 225 22e 4 6

11. 229 ]Ieue of preperty looat1on Remarks

5. lan d Saa B a€h Irmd ].rand !and trsr d tr e:rd tren d Ira.rrd !end III Dlyl8lor outside MlsrT cuxJ III Dlvislon iuslde U1sly eunJ Sezax Ehas Sharnsheer E rlt Sun J Jab. annuna Parwarish GunJ Ch.owdl Us]lBraJ E;tJr J Eouz Jg.lps.l-It Anlr' GunJ , &r.ra:rapu1. III ! i:ris Ion lnslde Shaler GunJ. j J""rr^-tsL-s^^ REoEMR-C0[0($SIoNS S$ATTI{E]'IT NO .IV IErtyktse allotment of Nuzoof leadg. ____:::____-_______ Rsl1k Paxtg p8rty ed. Vqlueof a110tt- sbare6' or 6hare al-].o ltt s aI 3 a].srroc 8y& e oc ov- eeabl e Renrark Si. Xame of party !I o. 10 Iha,r

1. Nb.M azheruddin Eb.orr 2" N ewab Bashlr fiurg 5. tr.Rs.of tratee frldd:!1l 4 4 . L. B.s . of Iftekb rrud 11E 5 5. Nb.Atuneduddln (he1 Nb.Afs arudd In ib'a: Nb.I qba)-udd.in (har \{ aJlhud d:-n lhae ,ihrzL ,l I 6 Nb " Nb"Sahauddln tsaan 9" 9 10" Nb. Bodruddln Kbar Nb" JsLeluddl.n ih an t2. Nb. Ghaziutldil Kh an Nb "flarlBudd l::. Khe.r 13. 14" Seblb z-6111 Fsf'eed- 111uds a Begum 15. Sablbzadi !ao{ q- ur[lIs a Beguln 16. $'ah1b z adl Izzrut- uuls i Be guu 1?. Sahlb zsdi If tr k8r-' urml s,a Begun

18. S'alll.b zq41 Ma]-:ke ,Iaha] Begurn

19. Sahib zadl Akh :8l: J ahan Segum

20. 5'd11b zadl Dawrod - ururlsa Segun 10 11 L2 14 IO L'I 2L Note: - -A11 rec ove r ible aaount hag been re )ove.ed. L&32 t9 &, 2t 5&26 30&33 5&29 16 &.24 L4& 22 L2e5r 11 &20 2r 18 8& 9 24&% 4&1 16 n 19 b t'l 25 3+.44

34.48 55" 10 34"48 oj]. cr

55. d9 35 .40 50"79

34.7r 54"'74 L't "24 !'t "2+

18.57 L'I "lL r7L24 L',7.24 17

24. " L L x x o.1?

0. 99 x x

3.69 x x x x x

0.13 x i x x 0 .62

0.04 x x L o.23

0. ?6 x x

1.33 x x x x

4.98

5. 16 ,j --tu*.t ( k-q, *l,fJ+ t'-G- ---- 7 - RNC EI rM.-C O]{MI SS ION ERS, S4atsoql t No.V of Uekta.s (ZE ltcns). s..No" Sr][o" sf s todu16 Ir Atr N ene of tr{aktes Romar!cs a. 230 ?3L 232 234 235 236 23a 2X9 240 24I ?/12 245 244 245 z+6 244 ,no 250 ?5.r 252 ?53- 25+

10. 11"

18. 10 ?L. Behadur I;Ii Doatapa -Il Shivxanpally Ba]-apur Ral Drug Soug 3ow1t SornaJiguda Narvab S ohlb Kuata Mamar Eaneeda BB€h Eakagud.a. EaJl AUguda Permlt Shotrlgurta. Mazhargude 3 agh llooe s. Renu .lioJ ed Nsga? ohs.mned. N agar $anBlguda. J[U. Sbbibgudta ohitgudda Yal l akun! - Ycrwagutla KoI Bo',fll Shana€ud.e RaI S anerrd ar Rosha[ lo'rIt S d"b"-^^ tSL^g"" ./4-ti^r-14 '/--_ P&Clil !-D R-C 0l\rytr SS I ON !.-CS I St.q,T4),18 1 i{(. !-I }rOR Dlgid-Ai\TtrI c At{D yfIDIEtrING PA,SS.{CE (S fteae) S.No. S;Nc. of Schc dul,r r.An :------------ r-na ^t NaJne of lroBertJr 1 -) 36 1C)4 c. MuLgI Mu1g1 Iand 85 1-10 Ltr1g1 ----------------j;-- nnEopl" No. 4" R€IIarks

5. o}der dateal 31-4-61 on aPPIlc atlon No. 109,/61 598 63L/L 65L/? rtl( o.-\\Lt^- S Lr^- I /-'G R.!C]EIWR-CO ]NM IS SIOIITRS gtato"uent No"VII LIst of Jab.€tenuma larracks (SO ftur"). U "$o;; Si'No:oi. sche(k11c ilAll a-::---1-::-r:- i- (:{ NaDe 1,6f,. j2rope}ty..,, ,;: tfura1 c1!.alo iBi:'c. [.,a:ir:-;k s: N6 ":.[;;i;r-iis, - -1,0_ 1" 4"

9.' 10 'rr;' ' " l2:" i:.; ,.j i ,' L4;

15. J-b" !7.

18. 19" 169 i7'o' t - " 1?1 . ,:",i,12 715 Tt5 L76 ' iii ,'.; ''" -'tia'' " .'j?ti 'r ''' .,t'-,18d 1 , .'*181'' 182 183 184 i-; '1 I :, 185 1e6-' .r I,, 187 188 ,:.' Roon xo on Boou Room Ro ora Roon Room Ro oro Room Bo oit Eoom Roo1I Boon Room Room Roou Rooa Roon Roorn 2r-; ' '-489 - - -Roou 190 191 192 193 794 '.1' 195 196 197 198 23"

25. 26" ?8. 90

30. Ro on Bo om Roora Roo:l Roon !o on Eoon Room l.: ,.Dlspens sqr.. +. 1to5 6to10 13 15 to 16 !,1 18 to 19 ZL 22 23 24 ?6 teo 2'l 28 to 29 50 31 ! l: ,,,':' ],' ,l . tri 1;.:.aj)t t-.:tj: frc -- d::"' Cc1 54 35 to 3'l ____i_____. . _. qe to 40 Eouse Zlno slteets to 45 Off lc h.ouse to 46 to 59 42 44 47 . 60 ?5 to 78 Maglo1.e tilsd IOons. 't9 to 82 95, e5/L 94 95/Lo? a 6 r.U. (' C N ame of partn. No. 9IAT@If NO. VTI tmen ofJ se all Rrotlr gllot- Earty.. t6d. um ! Ysfuo of Propcrt- .16s all- ^ .- ot.i;od. a 3aI e o E M oovell- I ?. 5", 4 &, L5 5& 6 22 e. 30 19&28 3&,4 L&,2 La&27 L6&r? 2D&24 \5 &, 2L 52&9 1,t&8 4 6 7 9 10 11 L2 L4 56 64{0 5615-O6 5652-00 5633-00 5 648-00 722,240 5698-00 5644-C0 6640-O0 5651-00 5690-00 5664-00 15 14 & 3L 5687-00

6. x 41-00 2-0 c 21-00 x x 10{)0 14-r:)0 :: r: 35{0 10-00 x x x 1568-00 44-00 x E ,x 56-00 10-00 33-CO 10-00 x x 26 7 25 I 10 16 11 18 19 2L N o t o!- A.-I :r;coverable a&orrnts hiLve 1)een reoovered.. 2837 -C0 :&.ff- @ t 2a18-00 94865 -O0 2065-GC '162-l.to ): ?64-00 35-00 11-00 9-1)0 x x 914-00 2508{0 181,L J'dJ.lt,.- .- E.EOE IV!R-COI,OIIIS SI O]f ERS. o ,d 2) &o H <Aa HoE H ,d IA ; 7 {'P { V.s \ $ ) a) 5 '.J F.,] H o p :s 5 o p 5 (n (0 5 H s P o q t^ - P -1 F 3 m Z -l I I<i: ^-> oroErl/ o Flhdill tD (ull .! or-jct, P*dEtro @ @.F +o I 91 "BHO ,:* .d N A'(, o o o a o x t{ x x Io 6 -t o, o -t o Po I EI .+l d H o o do' I : 9 EI H,.],l l- H Bl E3o!t trH .dts l- 11p,5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,t'l ,l I ,l I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I

0.) Fr3 o ,d o 5 9D F, CN o l) o x H u o Or{(, o cDo x t\) @ x x x x N Nql o (t N o-n x D4 x x N o-t C,lo (o E N o o () o H x FTo x N -T o 40 olJ o -lP r9 0t l"\ tsF R.o .N t\] a E40 OH p \to 19 C,r t9 _10 .P orNc) U poto c| -o,C,}H o +o:iijH (ntl. .. \.. (h -t a! ao tl\rJ o. P. d @Nor. ;t . q). o.r. Pts. tsto \@ 6r.5 Fr or. ,! to lll o. Foru-. riJ rF . r+ p, Nco rc,. lEr lo dNo) Ho ..-F €q-Nfd tP o tr :j.o_o - -.--'1 -L', A o 17 f Po !o r/l or; Co t\'o @o o cn(o o a x x o Il*l. I I I I I I I I I I I a\rt' I o o a o CL H x x x ..: '.! l\1 <n (o o oo. I I I I I lor I ltltlltiliIt lrts I l. l' II t( t(, I t. i II Itll Il It lor I i' I I I I I I I -ol .t I I I I I I I I l c0 I I I I I I'o I I I I I I I I I I f. (: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I N o Do H x o o o N c, I x H x C,l (o o N @ @o -Hgf ES"4EF s,EB,se SXE [F.:EF XFflF.3 'FF rHrs$ -\F'H;b' HT RiL:-" L;i;' .,r-.16,* Sp g-p [r. I I I I I IFI F,"l I I I 'u B Fj E = o H o c) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ID o U b ,-J '\ -t {G cn- \J., o R o o It o tsFo tr.+o I u EB 5o Fto oH l! r-t o o @ o B EI5 F I I I I I I I I ,l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t OP JEo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E FT H !d I c) H <hHo E \,\ t\: \\ 5$ L ) (- ,e a tt_ L. a 1 E.E B i E anQ EepY @- CnJ H 'ir H \e a\, <o BBE*I <r F' q ColC, l}. q CJrlts -! k 5 orftts.o -nlcn (o {(, o @ @ao c,q, a! o <o x x H x c0N -{ @ t9 (Jl t\lo o H Crl t\) t\] @(o (n C'I x x @ N -.1 (! (, C,r-n H ,4 t4 (rl\: a)o ts(n t'r a0(o c0o C'l P -it -{, x x x x -n (o CN (n { t\,(o Iro ld P P@ : - rl .ls ct OrPt$o o t\) I\,o O COts o, \H(D or. t-j llti+ t9 aD rts -! 8P.i tsP,e o t':e.o o o slrd B Or.+'d F, 9,. rd 9. ot. rd o, q?lFPo r\1lJ(o -(o!. H traa B \lF (,r 5 . r\r gt. oloJ qana6o, . "n+ tg Or\.+ ' to o)o Iu cr\a' a$m A P Or-r\t € e"L {., lP ,d c 6'd [P.o HO o) rr t3 o HN . FJO 4:, . Hts F Pp o |., cD@ cDF, I I I ta\? I t. I I. t' llrtst ttttlt.tt ltlrtt ttltlttl l. lltttt ttlrFl l. l(,r tllltt ttttItll ltlor Ir'tlt I I I It ltt-ni t. I It l(Dl It II t(ot t. IJ It II tPl l. ltl! II lFl tFl I I llttll II tltttl ) o o o F4 H H o Jq: o 5 o U o o 0. E .z o l-\ ^ t\t l= IH'I t /:'m (n oi \--, o) t0 H o c/io o o, F o .E TBBPI FJU E H o o F-o - OtsJG+ I I I I I I I E'HF I o oo I ts +o I +p Ft, I IJnr *B IHo r EFI tro r <rts rolot I I Ft o o H + l-l o o l0 E o E 'd t, o I I .t o o @ o r-l a o H ,l -l .t t I I 'dFl tso I i-. E r p5 rctt I I I I I I I I I I UIotHtsrgBl <to t@l -! IE'I HI P( rl glI I I I I I I I I I g tlrc)o B H o1a HI H6 i j L ; 7 ; FI -v) - ( I IIH Nrlc, +.1 (,lo(, gIEE UI IF (, N a0 x x x x X x (, t\] o t9 Co C,r @ (o o x H x H c0(n Or Co -l @ O) IF Ho(Jlo o, q) r\) P @ I9 t9 t\,\) H x a\]ooo o O x A] 8o H XH o t\, Ooo (, (o o, C,l t, P{ F a o t\)o o o o H i{ o H i{ x N o o o EFE' .Fiff €Ftr iFi HF& pse Ss'B ;Jg j.8 3-33. fgg 3& '3s Eq t.5 i 'B Fr. F1 . I I I I I I I I I I I IIN I I , I I I Ilcn I I I I I ! I I I I Ilrtr I I I I I ItJl I I I I 1 I I It> I I I I I I I It.{ I I I I I I I ItlD I, I I I I t I Il!O I I I I I I I I I I | (:) I I I I I I I I I t IlF, lF, I I I I I I I c) t4 H I c)o E Ha Hq ct) :tr1v .st l^\. ,./L Pr'Y? F( -12 A)lf p ts l; Far ,:o0 F' F1 F c c t l- (,r Nrl, n -: sl;lF s[:b ) obEtf c) oro F'hdiH oH.+ f0 o E (D o H H o FT E d (D (0 o H H o H o g P o I\1(, P t\l CN &I H (D <17 o oI H o r=, =l t,w olHrl I I .ml I 8lol .tlFIottrl(Dl I I I t I I I I I I I I I I-l I I I I .t I I I I I tJ o o ? I I I .l HF 5tsoo tsci*T Bo E FtO oFt c 5 o B T4 F+, o o o D o @ E E o Bri Fl I I I I I I I I :t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o,Fl E.E Iptr I<tt tI HN I@r I Fto I <tF rol I I I I I ,dr I EI Ipl t, I H. I Icl"l I I rF ( a9(o fcoE B E EBI* B .4 rJPlF[[ (o . a p tolo ro q P Nl@ e,t c{ P Or x x x N(o o, O) x {gl o o o F @o o o H CN N o H a\1 @o(T { P ts\: (o (o x H x x F{ XN -t Eu { -.t I E c0 t\?(,{ (o t\1c, \)ooo (n -q 15 x H x x -{ o N(o

3.BEg o oo r, hJ E I' oFl'+ I I I t i I I I I I I'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I ,l ll,I I I ;l 't,I 'I 'l I I 'I I ,l 1 'I I I I I .l I II,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I t I I t I d*zaD50 5 oe+(to Fr Pr I O.l rBtso o o oPcH .+tr lDoHu l_rt o o o fop. o '-t @ E Bo E <i o F' ..J Fpo FTE P, Fj Ed PE .fo o o P U ID I IIts I o-1. I I I I I I I I I I ItBl I I I I I Il*I. I I I I I I I I I I IlrF I I I I I Il(,t. t I I I I I Ilor I I I I I I I I | -.il I I I I I Itco t. I I I I I Il(o I I I I I I I I IIE r I I I I I t I I I IrEl iP I I I I I I I I I I I <),+ o o H H o Bo (D o tJ o o g) o t\, (, o EY H o F! v) o tt(D 6 c) t'l H E Ic) E H H o ts] U) c- V) V a e F- I I I S' o o FE o rd ts, lJH E O tO rd or H ry -cotr '-t Ql P or 14 o, o.t Ho .l Ch(o (o -! r\1 . O. fr'1' E.s ,o oro td F' 'N O rd P, hJ lj H(DHA SHlto .og,A' (oclo p Fo -cn N Oraga a9 Or ' ol\f Ep EOtsJH tsp,HO :J r-, EF (u l\] (0 a\l \.o or9 (r1 o c, c) 6 C) F, N H x x o Ioa t) L] .: .,\ ,l (- e 5 , 90uF<llrl E r( o F h!, $ ! E8 rrQ o c)@d -t 11 'ts o 8 Ea x H x H E o o 5o O)oo o 5o o€r,*[E FOO h!F HAO. .,F ENo O.P (O o., El Orgl @ OI N a @o x H x H x |ts .lg il. €Io Io x x x x Crl Or (,lc{ tl38 o$oanouroo5EOlts FO(O po(a EEl ,gtB HO o iJ6 o L" S kt'S o t\,0 ct {o rOE ..E @. o PAO -gr or pr _at c a bt.r €.$ a qr .{ llF< 0r 8o 6o P 'Fgl (o ^tIo @ x H x PC,(,to 6ooo P coi:{ I c,o l\t E o I or6 O) CN @ N I t! 0ro02 EE8 14 l-, .f OF. qo or.rE(n. o l}tog Or. d (t, F :dtio P C)o d, H <A <A H <) t d ) I bt, totstt tsEH l_l .+ HFE4 oEto E@. f6t" .lh I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a -EE'Ood tt' Ba I F B o o c F: .+ l, l'{ 'd o o o l-, ID B o E o H Uts loot-traV PfoOP FTF .i: o F o Bp + E v) F o Eo ,L4tso (,}{ I,Eo 0, lt '., ;,E o@ts !to @ ts(D, cl o El o=tr P o ('l L I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .t I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I .t I I I I I I ,l iI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I .l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lH I o lo r Fl I I I t._ It tlllor t.i ;l It II tgl I I ltlrt! I ll}r l. lU]r II t6lt lo I It l.|I I l. I tll(or l. ll-l lllrll lllrlllttt tllrll tro I I I tPt r@t I o,. I llttltll lPl lt.t l. I E 4 o \, -: BH dt, H tli }(ro Ee -f x,- ,- P'; t' ' P.19i r o o o > tJ ts}A Fra o @.6 .+ @lJ .Er rdor{ .{Elc l,@tr dF p o E o- o 'o: <+oFtto d o B t r. riftr o ;{'ii -{ o toHO U F u ro to or8.lh't: a, ** *at \,OtsOp. F f ! Iti o a F5 t,o .9 ti" <t D rE Uop F' o + B o tit, o E o H o H e a @o F o @ l! o o o I +Ito F q G d E o I @ F, E p H o f, Eorl E' P -a ----p (ra () ET !do o, .P '!:'E"(o-rF @ -I -.it -I o(o@'a e,r N nC o(oN' FN'9(,I Frt\,ts Or@Oo, s cn F^ ir oo N, r. ) I I c{ o E B !l o Eo o Ft l1+ IH l8 t@ d IH l.{o r{ 4 o D L> l@ D () d p I H E >4:o c, Y El g E H B G .f0 o o \ I H E @ F p c) 4 o FJp 0 () ,t ) ,', t- I a B I O) 4 E o o r-j o E H.{ @ bdBo'OH EEoo}l I tit6r .tl P. I 8l I I I I :dl Iot IEI IHI IF(t @l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I t I I I Or t,FE t0 dao HAD( O HE . E'Rro F' E o<l@-:-r poFo H isE-it I C'I E o e H (o E H (rl td F(bp EE o @t $E P !drro r-t g) F o Ex F, E. :d li) l-L 0) fl) B o E 19(I oruN loP@ <,r tEoro OO PHo p!J tO Crr t9 Or C,roto oito(, olFor CtP N -.ll Ei t )+ -I $lo Ho't: Ci Etp F @ _) F @ o l+u }T TJ Dlr r+&DtltDo olt e{O doio fi@P HOtsoo ts<< o 9J E .D FJ l0 o f, Io I N( ls\I\ IIl\ \1.(' N\ UL t/1 (- (6 .tP OH E.t Eo Ott I Ei p F 9. -(,,ooo 'l-\ o p & B tsFr .+o tsHE l+ t-t uE d-!+tt OF(D.il Frrr+(Dpfto loe o NF I o h-r Ei O.i.t tsJlt5o o| !+ A. O P, Ulrd o C.' x6 *E Hdo Gro o,p o tr .+ ft .+O O lJOcr'E O Ft o k 'iJ E d 'rrFP (nl (D o rrc f0 ,f oi Htr tr o tr o o o.(D. .t o/ El O +6b td-{o.D It ot o tst! i, do o, P\ P to..D(D ,t c+.|.r cI !D t0. . (lrolr ]3 d"o t o <(oE O r'' ! Pr*+rr H. .l'o ts P ' EtsS3* E 6 0(,1 0 (o 4P4 l'E ri o o dO E o! O E O G' ts H.o <r E P @[oHtr+6 ' 606 O .FLts &UT E Er f OAoH DT @ -i, (t FE .+tsoH E.t 40oF! |{ OH 'EoPJ o ET o o tr' (D E a0H Or (+.g to. Ol I N(.! F' p luNA'tsPHH OOO(O(Oc|.+ C,rPP -: -ilH C l I I I t.+E r>ts ts> GA Fio EH FF' trF' tl<tpH. c)o{ql" Eit 4. o @ ro-ro (o to @ tIl tl ol t or ol |lFJFr(OlO N1 H FCNA tsto@ c, E B Fo -il cr o, Oc)oooo 15d E d f0 PP P@ GOp F o F4tr BE OE o@ d i<ts o @.iHF B".O t* o J. H ,CI o E o E E I o B f, @ o F, -+ Ep (, Io c0tt B E !0 @ E' Eo @o tD o ol, o r-t E H ID F' E o Fj ID B B o lJ H N Or I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I J Eti d E' .! @E Ea l.loI @ .D4oI I t I I I I I I I Il. I I I I t I I I I4i l0t B-l @l Iotbt 16 IFrl olf, Iql I I I I I I I I I -<r I I I olHItslol IotFtl Illtsrtt Iurol(,I <tltsttl.l FI I I I I I I I I I tr, I Iol IEI II-l FJI I IlI I@t .l I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I Ci t9 OtH l-E .E o BB o@ oPq .n Eq oD(H+. 1t0 Cn '.+ td OF 9?B l-J o'z."+ lJFIE{ B&B g"'t- o ltsF (rl- OoPq '\c)'1 arr'o:a t H >E o rrr tdit EP a5pcq P'p 8 I Flo@ e lJif+Fd.oo tio.2 g)o, 'obra H a,ID !' 5@ dt! tr 0) oc Fl 19 @ -9oo I 4l: td (Doo o Pii**$ H C)Qr h5> .tC F' liP s ora. !, td H0) TB I <caott }Eo mf,+p <01.1H Aa)t , L'' 'A 5El '(Dol PO I oH)l E o H F, o o H .$ I I I I I I l.= d I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I irr I I I I I I I I I I I -l bo r B PIatrr (Dt HO I I I I I I I I ' 5'.I OI Prl Bi o p H tD CN (a p o E o o x o F, o o H Irirtr l9' o p B t, o B (D H 6 F o b c) <n o -il CN F< E l! @F o rn NNtoN oiOo-{olg \, rnNr\'t! AOIPO CTo o|-F PF, oFlP(, ht t$C ort! NOOP c,H p o o Itrl+ IH I< k k u;.lH l.()l EtP $ u'd tj i.i o, Pq C*F*E , Btr- +* hHE6:5E3 tdBE ",o3 B[E$HggF i;fl H6H :i1gtl3s: EiE' sEE oE A^t^X ir.,6 *u; t',5 € E. e8 q 9sc b': *jx gafl ir* E*36 -E E** $t" -s"" lfi B-? "r.h: 3 B f, o E:-6 o F, I \Jo E?es H-' Ffi i** xHIn tB fB &oF' H;TB ;: ;5 E[: *XE* gF Bp 'sd E SE " 9' H.' i-.4 Flng BE EE el e[+* E'H B6' I ii'aDh Lq oH Fl o ^EF,oe H tJ o o 9J o ca rrr\) r8.; U@ ' 9. C/) Ftr Ii ot,bpF, @lo ,o ts^j Er Ct)EI ;it- ,ot C,l \)o Ioo {9 rI I(, o x (o (o -a I(rlo N (n -l FOto@-lo(,| rF Crl N tJ,tr.u oo(Dtr5tr BSB *444 NtsO tJ tJ.UIJF UO,t,.U o (! oo (oo i00 (l h r-i Ft r-t Fr, Ft Fn B E gSEE?9 8 9tu 9!9, FJ plBp, 9, o 0, 6 b o 0ro Ftrstrb{FLTEE d d <+<t. +. .t + a z,aa?zffz.z o o o o.. o . o o (ocD{or(, rts C}r 13sss\ss s \s (C)ro(o(orO(olo(o(c,(o A) a\) I$ NN ru\] o o o o o oo I r I rt I ()QOOoOO()OO ooooooo t\) r\t o o o ^r I r r o Oo I lllFltrA$A'5 M9 t\' aO t\) r\,ao O O O O O 6a) | I | I I O o o oo oo o o c, oo oo t9o Io tt, aoooE!oo l8 IE lFj l0) lH l@ IH l.i l1l> le' Iu tJ o F" o 5g g) o to{ (o No Ioo Io c) H H H H X lIH H H X H rtsrtsF-alr|E I I B 88 88 lllltltooooooo o(,ooooo N I o I\) 19 aO o o oio r- o

1.. ,.i c) tr+ a9 ) .t A(D IP't ).. I - ,| 1r:r EIrl-I IUIpl t- I I I I I I I I I I D CAIEurO0) I dH r I I I I I I I I I I I ,l ,l II ;turP,I rr:I P:I t-^ I +l F,t O,I .ol !l I ,l I ,lI :l IF Itr !t+ IE ,] (,". s,' IE IH t ,-i **- lH l: B o H l0 E o) oI I + E,, HPt€l o F P Fl0 Frr FJ |-, ES .<E a 'tH o o a t: o p F F E N a Siob-rorcrr$c,:t', P }J P P l-' PHHHPHPHF FllIgf$'s''BB g$g$ss$gs ?.t3++<i.|c+<f 4, d a 4 A 4.2 ooQoooooo SE8BB5B6E z' z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t\) (n a o Io o @ o <)o I H (r, I Ilttl It LI II Irl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _l :..+.\ >L I P F2f6 E''g j i, " * E t, ottsEci 5S*. a +-'!- i'' ': ,? sr F o-$ !PETPPPPN,N i, ,^(o<o(otO(O(o(O(o X,ororori\rN x,^ooc)oo I.] (,r <rt c.rt (, <n (, _i \IEEE6-oo O((J(J _'l roNaoa\?t9a\2t9tFF nsPPHttltO bb'o.rooooo 4.r5s55556 ooOoOOOOO XHHHXHHHH a\, ! ) .r I.t ' r. : ,1. . :,H/r- .ntl}-r'r.f, :\drll" : -_,. a*t -r Fr ill t-- fDl HI I I I I I I t I I I P.s) g) I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I t CiC o (q l rf E (r t p<t F. Elr@t .l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N :l .t ,l ,t ,l ,l :l ,l I I I I t ,l II .tJ E d I n o p P. Ol Hso (J] s) P o o i I I I I I I I I I I -'I t' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ipl j ". o,/ ,tl.l I Itt , lt, I I I I I I I I I / I I I ,) t 3 d E E F] c@3- t 3 \ ltsA'AAAl5Grl,( (^a(,,NrJo.o(or '-:'1--' ar 6r ct n(,lts ' i(o(o@@(o(o@(o(o@co@ao@@ r@ (E \r d| (,'sgrNy o@ @ { or ot -.1

15..! -\, -J E,O' . ..- ., Ll . -"ir" . i." ." :Jis;i;l:!;'l.L N ,P,O-@ @ ..t o'i,ltr} ..r:.':: ,r : .- .:. ,-r<11,',:1, . .,.-T-i'AA,A'A:AA 13 HC) Or (n Dc.' t\:tl m.. ii:P/t- -i', - .- oJ NP,o..o @'{ o or A c)n l/ .. . r.?_.1rr.-. a_ro a, ar'(,r.ao:t a, a! .,r (J Oo@-ilol(n'atr(\)lJO(oao ^r ^1 r E(a IE:EEEiTEEEE*u,EETt, cccccc IPPPPPtsrJP|JIJPFIFIHPT | 0q 0<l0a Ca m 0q C! 6 0o 0o o0qlh0a o ?d'rddnl'rdddxrrt'x !}r,F}rts|jtsFrrrrF ., :.5 i1IJ t, ^9 E E,ts EEETiE EE O'P.PFPlJPPH E0a 0ao!ho!0aor0q '"EJ 66ds.ra'rJ 'rrrrFrr}.|AEl^ FB B8 E EE!IAhEE'E':Atd E OoOotOoOiir d odooFoooe F E.DEEIhEEE.., troErx oFl, "G6 r-!) FE e b* B t0.00 t! x ti El > !dF tE o o 6 c o o rto b o o o trrJc c 6rc b d EEaroqt!EI,bir,b xrroo.t6 0 ItF h ^>( d EO .}o \i fi,(a &, I tl I I r r & (, Pt rFrEl F' ; IF fl E.+oEAE q trr r r r,,*,, e F fl f' fl F P' fl S E. -an r,',R P' fl fl r$6 .(, cn 6 c (n (, (,l (n (, (, (,cn -r (n cn tr l.l P P rJ p lJ rf rJ p rr { i\! h 6 6 an 6 @(D@ co@@qo@ @ @{oo o NP NtonoP ts rJ rj }J PHts an aip H(o co H io cD { o qi A 6, N P @-t o t-r ao U NH o (D (D co..! C,,In A &, (n to -.: or } a,J 'f rJP Fr PHrr F' !J P P rfP Ito'oqP ,aO P O rlc.EF-:ar: ,.f rrr.Jt)rr..E,a at,a,rata.tt.,r. t ed OgcolE(,lgO l\,E 8" NtoNNA,toAO N Nl\](,loOro!: <orol r-.)6G O D\:OO()OO O OO O \too o|A(^ooooQooooa,'oo '" *'E t. r ' , H, , r , 888fr88&& "'388& r I I lr odrd)616ldroi6rd!d6 .Pr-POOOOOO.OOOITO(o(o ilNPo @@ r: o|(n AI\rrJ o(o @ .lt 8 (l)(r(rorNc.r(r,rJN o< "'68 l1' ! l j t. t,'tr f r" ..-.'l) , !rl I 1 t- ! ;.d EI: 5 i:o DiE El3 qE ,J ,4 .E I I t IE I P-,.8PS FPFPFF $ fl FSFF'F$ SFgFFI "p'B E E's'B "E "E -E'E E E H "a E H' -8'8 6 "B E E s : idElln!(!1 8ts8 B BE E E FFBB:'tstsEFEtsS c;.PHf,f-t-PF,Pi:!-. i' ILPFI.]PPP'PHHH " n n"+rrnn Fe'P.PP ts B B:9tstsEFEBE EEBi]BEEEEEE tntDE=EE,I Boi!E :l +ii+ ++ n + + + +h ++i+h+ hi+ hF ppEp p Pe $i Q€QQQeQqQ ; n '-'!i i. !-- |j lJ F, .o c! { o (, D G, NF 'c!{o'ol(nNPC, :*E p s,.nft N Hr"^(^<<<AN<<N E6',r,r. 6 0 H I g 6B E g @.-B B' ip*88:*:11 1€f :'E }J. .1. a5a<,o.. qJ N \si si,{ v ='E\S' \-.oJ 'r\ \. _) R' rjlr : #h.,u, ffi:. dcd\roo6(dr\)P HPPHtsPHFJF 83$Sts8N8N '..t )PP*PrlHrJ,J 333'HESBE-.3EBESp3 PHF JPHH _,1 Ii ,,], ItJ'.P HPPF PPPP'-tsHO OIUIF(,)NHOID I'PPVPPPP sB888RS8 J9H*PPPPHtsPHHHPPTJ n in h.6 i! to ao ao @.\t ^, { -, -l a! -J -l iah-l G6NFO(o@-lo(,tA(])t\, ;l J,l3 I 'rl I PIJ,PHPFPP E $SESE Sp 6 .ntno!6an?n(,r(n @@rrol(,rlF.oH EE B 6 ts8tstsgF.EgtsBFF o o o 6 0 0,o o o o o o BEEBEEEEBAEB a !t 'r, E,E E g ooqFloq e E Iqp o bbb$!bbb$$bE llttallllll, 8I S 8"' i':' I 't BBHB tsB s PB6 t urt, $xsx$fl -Ii"ts '-' ri'L {" to o, d\j- '') 'L 9' 5' s 6orPc{Cr ddro)ojOr rit-an6 6 c, -(,(nan(n lt-..)rr5..o('rIt\,l\] ib rEEolForr€ Eqo..bo ,s oO.o Er(n5" E 5 6 (+OP f ra Eo B oc_ .',8 B. EI i: E FtsFtsEF8B ccccccnc, totrt/)ob(,0)D o ool!06.Do I tl! a,l PI d 6 Lg F :. ,.":. ; !:,/ . ;:i:_.' , , r':i -, , , ,. i,ti*iia:. ,1, , , , , , , , $P :it 8888g8BlF "'&8A8&88e&8& | .t I I I r'r | tsts8g I I l I r I I I t'rf!-t . E SEE EESA o@ ts tsEBBEESE \\\\\\\\ l,5 l.JP}JPHHFH .+ to l\rH l\, (\) O ltsG'(r,Ct't\JTJO(o ^1 ^1 iP o ^J I N I '" .. 'a- 88888 ,,f"ii I t' i3 ,'E : ., i .ni. . ,13 '4# I J;] lr .-tr' .:i ffi :il ,.1 .1. 'liali oo o .., o! , < dl<<}JPN6H F FFFE? P'n <l/|an rts 6 . o-d \: i\'\ P o, ia6o nr crc. o,all Er'tl-:t',.!:!.+ .+-r. rE.i .;t,rr'-^tri .o 'r.;:, _8-'F o 666p.b4d5, !,!1I!ota E .+.i .rt..a- rrlsf . zc ._E rJ t Erd O N -,.. ,.,,\5 .1.:.,r,-.} ,.o _\:z,io,tr-.o l'd . .:cr I Lre i i r' : ! . '' - -::'. : ., .::}. ,:::i . i:;j$.: i.. . . :r ;-+' r -. j ' jL;;*'t 'AfJ,-:(E ET H'sEE IEE EEqH "$-sE'$ 4B -sEt'sHE'b,-s'E"sE"s-sE H {H H E E HE B H H HH H H H H H g "B E-sH E"B-gHEE E E @dF! > _ ! H3 3 3 C * B a.eih, hu*FA.s,bFB ' i : Yiiiiiiiiq 'l F F g .J, 6 E ' FFBBBBFE E, * b s*l.sef,EEf [f B * Trrrrlrrrli|! g I ""F8ts8 FTFIFF cE l-fAgq 0|6 EEOOOO ,oo 00 "" +ii+ ++F+++ii+++ +++ihF+tt++F++++ 5E-H E EpeeQeEpH E ii E E!!E FB Fr'FP $ $ F F ? N*-i -n=oidAdNiF :: Ei q €SdBgBBBI i,,b -_J -; E ,l :d a \ro I ."\\ q ' \\\ ) l. I F |l B,* tsl r(/, HB l"r 3re t 3 o o-(a. ti (o .tB !'! z B t 5 E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' .,1 ''[ ] I I I I I t- I I I I I I I .h. :N r P ,F 1' -' tsFFH@. a, oit q s.o E. :!q I IE. E3t ,8a.o :,..; .a ,o 0q -i i I t: .l +."{ ') ' \. .,t.c \ t, 1! N \, E ,H 'i\1 (r A H (^ 'O.!() 3 8e3 888 < q,qs q r r I @ .t I ;: F '3":8 r: ':, a+ :: :.." ! , a.-' j: }N AC N N . ' -@,1: o (o tdocl(^ 'rilr<E6i!cfoo. oo'o,aE Err&€roi! 4e 6l lD o;U5 E, H It H E. OE .r, BB a, .l r-l B Ha tJ \ 5u \, q I .) !.,=-1:-+- ' :i.;t . ' :l '. :it ..1 o p H F3 3o tJ .?, 9- , = a t, I t, .t I 'I t,il l: I I I I I I I t_ I I t: I I ' ;-l:t' t. .-l I .- I ..'l ',t'ii " 'ri iA' '.t irt. -,:1. :t. ',:l ..)-t !ar :.Il - I l, I I I I I -l I .iii -','- ' - r"r i'"'' "-