✦ High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,061 words

R.Srinivas s/o R.Kistaiah Aged about-45. years Occ:Real estate agent, R/o 7--2- 5 8 I /5 82'burgushetty bazaat' Secunderabad- R.KrishnaKumars/oR.KistaiahAgedabout43years, occ:Real Estate agent, R/o 7-2-58 1/582,burgusheety bazaar, Secunderabad. P.Thirmal Reddy s/o P.Venkat Reddy aged about 48 years Occ: Private service, R/o Sharnirpet ' R'R'Dist' t0) M.Shivabhushan S/o M.Rajaiah@R'K' Thakore' iged about 70 years, R/o Attapur Hyderabad' 1l) K.Santosh Kumarr s/o Late K.Balaiah @K,Babaiah, aged about 54 years R/o Kalapathar, Hyderabad. 12) Pampulapati Subhashan S/o Pamulapati Somaiah, Aged about 40 years R/o Flat No. 2ii l, Plot NO 227,ir.JI{B Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 13) Danthuluri,VenkateshwaraRao S/o D.Malakondaiah, Aged 52,vuhrs Occ: Business R/o H.No l-l9,Ravipadu, !'injamur(m) Sri Potti Sriramr_iluu, Nellore Dist. 14) Mr. Pamulapati Jayaramulu s/o p.Malakondaiah aged about 47 years,Occ :Busi ness R/o Caul iaganj a,Niladribihar, Cuttack. l5) Metla Babu Rao S/o Malayadri Naidu Aged about 3g years, occ:Busiiless. R/o I 9.s.M.v. Koil Strdet, Triplicane,chennai-600005 l6) I).Prabhakar Reddy S/o Not Known aged about 54 years, Occ:Advocate R;o 9l12618,P.S. Nagar, Masab tank, Flyderabad. A.p. 17) K.Lakstunamnra w/o Lare.K.Babaiah(As craimed) aged about 7g years,Occupation :Household, Wo 23-4-65,Gowlipura,Hyderbad. l8) K.Yadaiah s/o Late K.Babaiah(As craimed) aged abour 63 years, Jcc : B us iness, lVo 23 -4- 6 5,G ow l ipura,Hyderabad. l9) .(.Kumara Swamy S/o Late K.Babaiah ( As craimed) aged about 52 '/ears, Occ:Business R/o 23-4-65,Gowlipura,Hyderabad. 2c) I(.Gopalaswamy s/o Late K.Babaiah(As crairned) agecl about 43 .cars, Occ : B us iness R/o 23 -4 - 65 ;G owlipura,Hyderabad. 2l) Il.Rajender Babu S/o Late K.Jaipal swdmy aged about 29 years, Occ:business R/o 23-4-65,Gowlipura,Hyderabad. 22) il.Yadaiah s/o Late K.Babaiah(as claimed)aged about 67 years, ( )cc : B u s iness R/o 23 -4 - 6 5,G owl ipura,Hyderabaci. 2i) S.Laxmamma wo Babaiah Aged about 67 years,occ:Household t/o GoWlipura.Hyderabad. ?4) 25) Verrrr{'i.Gopala Krislma S/o \{.Basava purnaiah Aged about 40 years Ctcc:Business R/o 3-6- I 0g,Narayanguda, Hyderabad. K arumanchi Ramesh Babu S/o Singaiah Aged about 60 years, C'cC:Busine$s R/o 6-3-661/9 A.Bhavana Towers, Sangeeth Nagar, K aparlia,Lane, Somaj iguda,Hyderabad.

26.Kolli Mahati Wo Kolli Ramesh Chowdary, aged about 47 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. 6-3-788/A/34, Durganagar colony, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 2T.Karumanchi Venkateshwarly S/o. K.Hanumantha Rao, aged about 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No.102, Swagraha Kalyan Apartments, Kalyan Nagar, Phase lll, Yousufguda, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) declare the action of the Police in not registering FIR against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of petitioners written complaint dated 17-07-2017 and 14-O8-2017 as illegal, arbihary, violation of the natural justice and fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of lndia, as well as against the legal ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumaris Judgement and consequentiy may direct the Official Respondents to register the FIR against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of petitioners written complainldt. 17-07-2017 and 14-08-2017 with an immediate effect in the interest of justice. l.A. No: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 39534OE2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to register case against the unofficial respondents basing on my above said complaints ctl. 17-07-2017 and 14-08-2017 and to take necessary action as per law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.SRINATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 TO 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 TO 27: - The Court made the following: ORDER 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE N.TIIKARAM.II WRIT PEIITION No.31748 OF 2017 ORDEf,I: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constituti,cn of India seeking the following relief/s:- " ...to i.ssue an order, direction particularlg one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or anA other approprtate urit (i) de<:lare the inactton of the Police in not registeing FIR against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of petitic,ners written mmplaint dated 17-07-2017 and 14- 08-2017 as illegal, arbitrary, uiolation of tLe natural justicez and fundamental ight guaranteed bg the Constitution of India, as u.tell as against the legal ratio laid doun bg the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumai's Judgement and consequentlg mag direct the Official Respondents to register the FIR against the unofficial respondents in pursuancc of petitioners witten complaint dt. 17-07-2017 and 14-O8-20L7 utith an immediate effect in the interest of justice and pass..."

2. Wher:. the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Srinath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ Petition with a liberty to avail other remedies available under law.

3. Permission is accorded. 2 !-

4. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed To SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 1 2 One Two of Telang 3. Two CCi 4. One 5. Two Hyderabad CC to SRIA.SRI CCs to GP FOR ana, at Hyd, to GP FOR EPUTY SOLICITOR GEN INATH REDDY; Advocate [OPU GEN ERAL ADMI N ISTRATION, erabad. HOME, High Cou CCtoD CD Copies rt for the State of Telangana, at ERAL OF INDIA [OPUC] ON OFFICER Court for the State PSK. PSK I HIGH COURT DATED:0911012025 ORDER WP.No.31748 of 2017 cot( 'I rlu i) lh JA!| 2M6 '. .r l' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS q h ) ,r)..''

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments