Gian Singh v. Sfate of Puniab and anotherl and Anit Mishra v' State of ll.P

PetitionunderSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the Hrgh Qourt may o" pr.r."o to grant stay of all further proceedings against the petitioner/accused in PRC. No. 1 22 of 2024 on the file of XVI Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First class, Medchal-Malkajg iri District at Kukatpally. I.A. N 30F2025 AND I.A o: .No: 4 oF 2025 I.A. N O:3 OF 202s Between ,'i}l?fffiit?iiu?!i,f*:[',?Bx?;f f; fl 8",11,r.?:1*.ai,,,yf i,?l;xr. ...petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND 1 2 Janagama Anudeep Babu. Businrss.nr.H"r,r67:i_i,r,]!^r:q"+?iiltit&'?i.f.?l!r,.rrffi i,x fi }##1d;:,q;qsr mlJi';ipilhsi lffi x", n# *:"li,,gl[f llif ,]:"*]i,,?',JE', tslrf :tft ,y""g*x Petition under Section.3!9fO) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum.or orouno-s ;;#;:i,;*rtion, the High Court may f n! rrro 122 or 2024 on the "^"i,ir,",,'. ?, lagrstrate of First class, Medchar r,,lrrLigin D[,;i"i'r, Kukatpaily. t#1'rTj:"i"'jXj,ffi oni!!:l.l jtii?B!.1,Li,i6fl ,3",,? t.A. NO: 40F 2025 petition under section -359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances ;:'i::Jl"f:"Y"T:JTi'r or c'"o'no1 "i'd#^ll r"t*ion, the Hish couri may il',iii;r",t',5lf,:'^'n[J,i*ff ?]',.::,:ii,'ir:s::r:l,;;:,a,::"]: j,,ij This petition comir Grounds or .,,,,*i 'n"ll,Jl'1""1'"t;r#, #ilr ff iH;TL:- :l sri Karan Goyar, Advocate for the petitioner rnu iii Jithender Rao Veeramara, Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri Mamidi Achyuth Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.l The Court made the foilowing: COMMON ORDER . .. :; - 4t..- *u- / , I I t ' t a THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.No s.3 AND 4 OF 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8270 OF 2025 coMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 o'f Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (fot short 'BNSS' 2023'), seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in Crime Nc.915 of 2024 of Jagadgirigutta Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate'

2. The petitioner is arrayed as accused in the Crime registered for the offences punishable under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS, 2023').

3. Heard t\Ar. Karan Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and [/r. IVlamidi Achyuth P.eddy' learned counsel for respondent Na.2l deJacto complainant.

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, they moved l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No'915 of

2024. 2 A'IR./ Ll.l'.a.'.I adI aJ202f it/a Cr/. P.i\l o. 8 2 7 0 of 2 02 i

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after completion of investigation, the Police concerned have filed charge-sheet before the learned lll Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-Xlv Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class lVledchal-lMalkajgiri District at Kukatpally, and the same is numbered as P.R.C.No.'l 22 oI 2024.

6. This Court vide order dated 04.01 .2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 25.07.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar cards/tdentity cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenVcompromise.

7. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record B Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and since the statement of victim was recorded under Section 1g3 of BNSS and taking into account the amicable setflement between the parties and to restore peace among them, in the light of the dictums in -*1...:: .:"i .:!'-:rt' I I i I 3 A"TI{J I.A.Not.) ad,l of 2025 n/and Cr/.P.N0.E270 of 2025 Gian Singh v. Sfate of Puniab and anotherl and Anit Mishra v' State of ll.P.2; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and ofhers3' this court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedingsinviewofthesettlementbyexercising,jurisdictionunder Section 482 Cr.P.C.1S2B of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice

9. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed Consequently' all proceedings in P.R.C.No.122 of 2024, on the file of the learned lll Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XlV Addl' Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally, are hereby quashed against the Petitioner/accused. 10 ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of' Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/ MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGTSTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, The XrV Additional Metropofitan Magistrate, ?I3"J*,ill' f,::.9,I'",?':i1s,1jl'11'd|ti::1","",t'#''J1,3'3iiXo,iin,", '' Two CCs to the Public Pros Hvde rabad (OUT) prashanth Nagar, Kukatpally, 1 2 3 l 2012 (1o) scc 303 'z 2024 INSC 189 I 2019 (5) scc 688 4 One CC to Sri Karan Goyal, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri tr/amidi Achyuth Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 6 Two CD Copies AllK,'gh Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise 5W HIGH COURT DATED:3110712025 COMMON ORDER lA.Nos. 3 AND 4 oF 2025 IN / AND CRLP.No.8270 ot 2025 o\a 1HE sIn ,6. i\ 1E A|JE zffi DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND ALLOWING THE l,A.Nos 3 AND 4 OF ZO2S ,{ w w { I i I lf! JO IN:T MEMO @ 1 The story of the prosecution is that on 18 08'2024 at 1100 hrs' the 2''d respondcnt has lodged a complaint before the 1" respondent stating that \n 2021' rvhile rvorking at Gougura Storcs, the victim met a man who introduced himseif as Abhi and proposed marriage. He gaincd her trllst and took her family's land clocuments under thc pretext of arr-anging a loan' In July 2023' she eloped with him and started living in a rented house.,e had physical rerations with r-rer by raisely pro.-rising marriage Later' she discovered his real name was Janagam Anudeep Babu' and that he was already marLied with a child' FIe deceived her about his past and lrequently shifted 'locationlrour I{yderabad to Bangalote ln August 2024' police intbrmed her that he u,as involvecl in cheating rnultiple women' inctuding a minor' auci cases of rape and POCSO rvcre filcd against hirL She also learned that he used her Phone-Pe account for criminal activities The complainant has requesteci strict legal action against AnuclccP Rabn ibr cheating'

2. It is humbly submitted that on the intet'vention of elders and well-wishers and the future of tho victim girl -;; ; peritioner, the 2'd respondentivictim have voluntarily come to a conclusion and decided to withdraw the complaint filed against petitioner sincc both the Victirn and the petitioner ale leacling their marital life happily- I ! I i i ! , 3 4 e lvith each othcr It is sr'rbmittecl that the 2nd respondent and the petitioner are in lov ancl the 1nd respondent has lodged the complaint without her consent it is humbly submitted that on the intervention of elders and well-wishcrs and the furure of the victim girl *nh;; petitioner, the 2ndrespondent/victim have voluntarily come to a conclusion and decided to withdraw the complaint hled against petitioner since both the victim and the petitioner are reading their marital life happily' f. nx^/*. ? g*[ P.-1Hl.r.< Actul<l I \ . t 6r. €o^..ie, >\ | k3?oaJu I I J,l** _.-o Q>ttt. g fel!*t, r< C-outJel 2\{ {let&*4*