High Court · 2025

4. The District Panchayat Officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem District S firukdnda Giam Pdnchayat, la(shmidevipalii Manoat, Bhbdradri Kothaoudem DistricJ, Represented by its Exqputive Officer. o ihe Distiict Collecicii, Bh'adradri Kotdagudem District, Kothagqdem. 7. Revenue Divisional Officer, Kothagudqm Division, Bhadradri Kothagudem 8 The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Qfficer, Laxmidevipalli Mpndal, L Ttie Sudeiintendent of Police, Bhadradri Kothagudem District' Io qiili^6nii"r3i oii+i, t-aimioevhatti'Pqlice gt5tion, Bhadradri Kothagudem t t . iharah Kumar, Son of Sri VeQra Venkaiqh, Aged 40 years, Occupation. of Near Morreduvaagu Bridge, Kothagudem Mandal, Lixmidevipalll, Bhadradri Kothaejudem DistriQt. District ' -ie.oident AgricUlture, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. rZ ftooiatjpati Raria Krishna, Sbn pf Murali, Aged 35 years, Occupation. Aqricultdie, resiOent of Near Morreduvaagu Bridge' Kothagudem Mandal, Bhadradii Kbthaoudem Districl. fe.G';ttam Prad€;ep"Reddy, Son of Purushotham Reddy, Aged 50 years, Occuo6tion. Aqiiculture, rbsident of Hemachandrapuram Village, Laxmjdevipalli-Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 'l4,Ganqam Saikiranmhi, Wife of Sri Puru$hottam Rao, Aged about 50 years, Qccripation. Housewife, resident of Hemachandrapuram Village, Laxmidevioalli Mandal. Bhadradri Kothaqudem District.

15. Komoallv Venkannd, Son of Sri Bikshaniaiah, aged 52 Years, Ocaupation. Agriiultdre, resident of Hemachandrapuram Village, Laxmidevipalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothaqudem District. 16 Yenudula Ariun Rao, Son of Venkaiah, aged 50 years, Occupation. Agric[lture, iesident of Karukonda Village, Laxmidevipalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. -7 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the lligh court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring, the action of the qfficial Respondents in not protecting the petitioners property, namely agrlcultural land admeasuring Ac.1.00 gunlas in Sqrvgy No 220 and Ac 0 19 guntas in Qr.rrvey No 2l24l E 9f Karukonda Village and Gram Panchayat, Lakshmidevipalli Mandal' Bhadradri Kothqgudem District, from encrQachment by the unoffiqigl Reqpondents who aJq indulging in activity gf constructian of dwelling hquQes, the action of the Pplice in not granting protectian to the Petitioner in respect of pqtitiongrs ploperly namely agliculturql land admeasuring Ac 1 00 gunlas in Survey lrJo 22Q and Ac Q .19 guntas ir-r survey No.?241E of Karukonda Village and pram Banch4yal Lakqhmidevipalli Mandal. Bhqdradri Kgthagudem Oistricl, thQ a9tion gf Rqspondgnt f'19 B 1n not granting Pattadpr Pasq Boo$ in favsur of Pelitioner inspite qf gtanting 1:B Patta in respect of petitioners property, namely agricultural lgnd admeasuring Aq 1.00 gyntas in Survey No 2?0 and Ac Q 19 gqntas in Survpy No.!f4lE of KarUkonda Vi[lage and Gram Panchayat, Lakshmidevipalli Mandql, Bhqdradgi Kolhgguqem Dlqtriqt eq beiog illegal, albitrery unlawfql and ylplativq of Arlicles 14,2.1 ald E00'A of the Qonstilution of lndia and cQnsPquenlly direct lbe respondqnt$ more pgflicgfarlY the 8th respendenl herqtn ts issue patteCer pe?9 boqk to the petitioner tqrthwith, and respondentg 9 and 10 to grant prqtection ta lhe pQtitiqngr in fespqo! of pptitioner lands situateq in Sy No ?20, 224tE to ?n qxlint of Ac.1 00 ?nq Aq.o. 19 ggntqs of KErukonda Village aog $ram fancftayat, La]1shmideviog!l!, Bladrgflli Kqthagqdem, fqrthqr direc{ the respgodents I and 10 herein 1c) take 4qtioq againg! tbe respgndelts 1'l to .16 herein in acoordange vyith the correct pigvioions of la$t and in pursuance of petitioners complaint. A NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circr-rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in sUpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct thq Respondent Nos.9 and '10 to grant police protection to the Petitioner in respect of petitioners property. namely agricultural land admeasuringl Ac.1 .00 guntas in Survey No.220 and Ac.0.19 guntas in Survey No.224lE of Karukonda Village and Gram Panchayat, Lakshmidevipalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District for which there is subsisting injunction in favour of the petitioner in in civil suits O.S.No.136 ol 2O2O and 137 ot 2O2O on the file of the Special Assistant Agent and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mobile Court at Bhadrachalam, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. rA NOr 2 0F 2420 .--'.--'1-----:=-r- fetitigp yndqJ Segtion 151 cFQ praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in quppprt of the petitign, the l=ligh Court may be pleased to direct the Regpo4{gnt Nos.4 to 10 to glop illegal constructigns being mPde by flespondent rygs 11 to 1Q in rPspeql 9f petitianers Ptaperty, namqlY agricullural l?nd admeasuring Ae.1 QQ guntas in Qyrvey No.220 and Ac Q.19 glrltgs in Survey No224lE qf Karulrqnda Village and Gram Panchayat, Lakgfmidevipalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District until disposal of the inlerim injunction granted in civil suitsOp No 1Q6of ?02Qand 1p7of 2Q2gonthetileof ttr.eSpqgial Assistant Agent and Qqp-DiVisionEl Magistrate, Mobile Cqr,rrt al Bhedrachalsm' pending dipposal of the abgyq Wrif Petition. NO: 3 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 ePq praying that in the ciroumstanoes stated in the affid?vit filed in Fuppofl of lhe petition, the Hig[ Court may he pleased to ditecl Ihe ReiponqgFt l!9I le issr,lP B?ttaCar pqgs Qook i1 rsspect Qf pe-litiqnerq prgBerty, ngqgly 4gricultural land qqmgasudng Ac.1.Qp gunta9 in Survev No 2?Q and Ap 0 19 gun1i$ in' Survey Na224tE of Karukqnda Village and G[am P4nchayat, Lakshrnidevipalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, pen{ing dispos4l of the above Wlit Petition lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Between: Qhqkya Papanayak, Son of Sri Bhamla, aged i:bout ,Agriculture, resident of House bearing No.745, Kqtha Tand Village, Tekulapalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kdthagudeq Di:;trict. 50 years, Occ. a, Muthyalampadu .,.PETITIONER AND flgmachandrapuram Gram Panchayat. Lakshmidevipatli Mandal, Bhadradri Kgthagudenr District, Represented by its PanChayat'Secr'etary iIEi9?i3F8tiBE8fR35? Departnent, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

1. The State of Tqla4gana, Eeptesented by its princiBqt seg!.etary, Home 2. The Stale of Tetangqna, Reprqs'enteit !y its principal Se9retary, Revenue Depdrtment, Secretariat Buildingq, Hyddrabad 3 The Etate of Telangana, Reprqsented by its Principal Secretary, panqfiayatraj and Rural Dsvelopmgnt Department, Secretariat Biiildinqs, Hvderabeid. ' 4 The Qistrict Panchayat Olficer, Bhadradri Kothaqudem Districi 5. Karuftonda gram Pqnchayat Lakshmldevipatli'nleinrjat Bhadradfi Kotnqgu6srn District, Repiesented by its Executiv6 Offrcer, 6. fhe District Collector, Bhadradri Kothaqudem Districi, Kdthaqudem. 7. Revenue Divisional Officer, Kothagudem- Division; Bhadradri-Kothagudem I Jhe Ighlitoa.l/{qndal Rqygnge Qfficer, Laxmidevipqlli Mandal, p The ffuperintendent of Pqlice, thadradr! Kotfiaqudem District. l0.Statiqn House Officer, Laxmide,vipatti Pglice S-tatien, Bnadiadr:t Kothagudem lqxmidgvipalli, Bhadradri Kothagudem pistriit, District. . ' 0istrigt. ll.Tharala Kumar Sonof Sri Veera Venkaiah, Aged 40vears. Occupation. Agriqulfyre, resident of Near Merreduvaagu Baidge, K6thagudpfi iUandat, Phadradrr Kqthagudgm District, :l2.Ngokalapati Rama Krishna. Son of Murali, Aqed 35 vears. Oceuoation. Agricyttgre.,.rgsident of Near Mprreddvirllgu BiiAgd, korh-.fgud9m'Ma4dat, Bhadiadri Kothagudem District. ' ! ' 13.Qottam Pradeep Reddy, Son of Puruqhotharl Reddy, Aqed 5Q vears. OccuRation. Agriculture, resident of Hema'chandrapfiram- Vitta6d. Laxm[(qv;pq11; lvlandal. Bhadradri Kothagudeni Didtrict. - ' Qbcdpation. Hbusewife, resident of Hemeichandrapurd;n Villaqe, faxmidevipalli Mandat, Bhadradri Kothagudem Didtrjct. -' ' 15. Kbmpally Venkanna, Son of Sri Biksham-aiah, ased 52 years, eccuoation. AgricultUre.,- resident of Hemachandrqplrram Village, Laxmidevipialli iMandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

14.Ghngam Saikiranmai, Wife of Sri Purushbttam Rao. Aoed about b0 vears

16. Yenugula Arjun Rao, Son of Venkaiah, aged OO years, Occupation. Agriculture, re_sldent of Karukonda Villag6, Laimidevipalti Mandal, Bhadradri Kbthagudem District. petition undqr Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ...RESPONDENTS implead the proposed respondent herein as party respondent No 17 in the main Wflt Petrtion as well as in l-A Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BHUKYA MANGILAL counsel for the Respondent Nos.l,9 & 10; GP FOR HQME Counsel for tfue Respondent Nos.2,6 TO 8; GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL Counsel for the Respondent !os.6 S 17: SRI G.NN-R_EI|-PETLE^?DY' SC FoR DEV GRAM PANCHAYAT Caunsel for the ReqPondent No.16: M/s. !NPUS [Aw FIRM Ceunsel for the ReiPon{qnt tlos.11 TO 15: *' Tho Cqqrt made the folforaring; OBPER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRTT PETITIO N No.229O2 of2O2O ORDER: This petition is colnir-rg for- hcaring sinc<: 2020. On O5.O2.2O25 when the matter was called, there was no rcpres;cntation olt bchalf o{' the pctitioner, ttierelore, the matter was directed to be listcd undcr the caption ,,for Dismissal"

2. It is obscrvcd tl-rat u,hcn thc matter was called on 19.O2.2025, lcarncd cour-rscI rcprcscnting Sri Bhukya I I Mangiial, learncd c,unsel lor thc pctitioner, submitted that counsei on rercord has br:en appointcd as (lovernment Pleader anci requestcd timc to change vakalat. Therefore, the matter was directed to bc listed on 12.O3.202|5.

3. On 12.03.2025. u,hcn thc matter was called, again there u,as 1'Io represcntation on behalt of thc petrtioner and the matter was dircctccl 1o be lis[cd under the cir.ption ,,for . Dismissal". 1 \-_::. _ , .1

4. Even today, when the matter is called, [here is no representation. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed lor non-prosecution/ default. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this Writ Petition sha1l also stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ate [O ucl the State of Telangana, at One CC to SRI BHUKYA MANGILAL Advoc Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for Hyderabad IOUT] i;;-cC. i, cFFon REVENUE, High Qourt for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] irir;-cc. r. dp ron PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, Hish court for the State ofTelahgana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 6il cc io SnYb ilnnefuoen nro'ov, sc ron cRAM PANcHAYATH 8I"'31 to M/s TNDUS LAW FIRM, Advocate toPucl Tso CD Copies lh- \ To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PSK. BS HIGH COURT DATED:0310412025 ORDER WP.No.22902 of 2020 ,/ ,<: o3T HE S r.i 19 M JUI'I /..) ) 't DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/ DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS(r ,) L