Maharunnisa Begum v. The Commissioner of Police
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 13 Dec 2004
- Bench
- BILAL NAZKI, G YETHIRAJULU
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 392, 411
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the petitioner son Shaik Madeen son of Shaik Nadeem, aged about 22 years, before this Hon'ble court bodily and consequently set him at liberty forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondents No1 to 5.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following: (Oral order: Per: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bilal Nazki) This Habeas Corpus petition is filed to direct the respondents to produce the son of the petitioner by name Shaik Madeen s/o Shaik Nadeem, who has been arrested without any authority of law. In the counter affidavit, it is stated that the detenue has been taken into custody by the Police Officials, Hayathnagar police station in connection with crime No. 517 of 2003 registered under Sections 392 and 411 IPC on 06-12-2004. The detenue was produced before the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, East & North at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy district and has been remanded to judicial custody and at present he is lodged in the Central Prison, Cherlapally. There is nobody to dispute these assertions. In this view of the matter, no further orders can be passed. However, the detenue can be at liberty to approach the appropriate court for appropriate relief. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed. No costs. __________________________ BILAL NAZKI, J ___________________________ (Dr. G. YETHIRAJULU, J) Dt. 13-12-2004 Pvks/* To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Station, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Inspector of Police, Balanagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Inspector of Police, Rajendranagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Inspector of Police, Pattancheruvu Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.
6.2CCs to the Advocate General, A.P. High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
7.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 392, 411.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Dec 2004. The bench was BILAL NAZKI, G YETHIRAJULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.