The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI cUDl MADHUSUDHAN REI-- Dy counsel for the Respondents No.1to4: SRI L.RAVTNDER, A(;r, FoR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5to7 : The Court made the following: ORDER . - ' 1:iJ-&&FTr!17 , "+: . ,-.,7Y IIOI{'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION Uo. t 8q36 of 2o2S ORDER It is staLed the-t pctitioller No.1 is ths claughtcr-irr larv and petitioner No.2 is the gt an<lsott ol Paknla Rama R:cldl', ii'ho is '.h.c olv.ner and posscssol'cf tht egricuitr-rral land acinr '-i'su:i;'g Ac.0.12 guntas in 51'.Nc.i 13 arLlt tc.10.02 gur-rtas itr other sui-\,cy numbcrs, situ:ticil aL Antlaram Villagc, N{;rrlal<ondoor Mandal, I(arimnagar District and rir-tring his liletin.lc, the sa cl Raman:r Recldy executcci .a Gilt Scttlcr,ent Decd ir-r fir'''ottr of his three sons i.e., husb:rrrll ol pciitiouer No.1 ancl lcspoudent Nos.S and 6 and l<ept tht: lanrl zldlueastti-ing Ac 0 O6 gu:ltas in Sy.No.112 and Acs.2.O3 gunLas in Sy.No.113 rviti.r lrrm lt is further stateC that alter the dcath of the isr pctilioner's husband, rcspondent Nos.5 to 7 have made cflorts ''o mutate the said extent, which stood in the name ol the deceascd to rvhich the petitioncrs havc objected. It is further statcrl that, when the said otrjections are not cotrsidered by respondent No.3, the petitioners wcrc constraincd to f,rlc W-P No 19l77 of 2024 before Lhis Court and this Co:urL, uide order, daLcd 79.O7 .2o24 disposed of the saicl Writ Petition directing the --r, qffiffi,* r .- 4:-i.r._ -) C'\'BR- J ti p ltiS36 2015 District (lollcctor-rcspondcnt No.2 thercin to L.iatrinc ancl consider the objections/ application submitte._l bl trir l)( litioners before granting Pouthi lzafa lor thc lancls hcld trr tltr. rlct:casccl patLad:rr. The qrievance of Lhe petitioners is that. r ter rcpeal of the Tclan6lana Rights in Land and Pattadar passl. ,, is .1r:r. 202C) (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2O") and replaced b,y r lr : .l'c.lzrngana Bhn Bhar;lti lRecord of Rights in Land) AcL, 2025 ii,r sliort ,,l,he Act I o[ 2r)205"), the succession porvers have bcr rr :onji:rred to thc Tathsildar ancl taking aclvaDtage of the san,. respondent iio.4, $tthour considcring thc objections subri ILc.l by ti)e petitioners, is proceeding to granL pouthi lzafir r ccr.ssron in the name ,rf the unofficial i.esoondents herein. I.l,.r lc, this \{rrit PeLltion.
2. Con:;idered the submissions of the learned r.,r., nsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistan r ( iov(rrltment PleaCer fol Rc'venue appearing for respondent |l:s i trr 4 ani r;ith their :or.tsent, this writ petition is being dispr :;,cl o[ at the arlmissicn stage. [n view of thc relief sought fr, 11 t]tis ivri[ petition, is;suance o[ nctice to the unofficial r,. ;r ouc](:nts is dispensed'.vilh. CVBR, J \\'p I8llJ(r 202 5
3. As seen lrom thc record, zrdmittcclly, thc pctrtioners havc filed a wr;t pctition before tlri:; Cor.irt r,,ir1e W.P.No. 19177 of )CZ+ claimrng thar- tirey a1c thc legal lteirs ol thc clcceascd anC are entitled to a share in the propertr- lefl b_v Ll-rc dcccascd I Ramana Redcly, rvho acct-rrriing to 1)'c;;etitioncrs died intestatc, anci this Court also dircctcd thc District Collector. $'ho conferred with the powers under tl-re provisions of the Act 9 ol 2020, to examine the objections subrnitted b,\' the pelruuncrs. Pcnding examination of tl're said application, Act 9 of 2020 u,as repealed and replaced by the Act i c:; 2025 whcrcin the po',vers co;-rferred earlie;: to the District Collector is now being cor-rferrccl to rcspondcnt No.4-Tahsildar to dccidc tlne inter se succcsstoll rights of the parLies.
4. In view of the samc, this Court r1cems it appropliatc to dispose of this i\,rit petition directing respondent No.4 to cxamine the claim submittcd by thc pctitioncrs bcfore granttng/ entertaining any applicatior-r submitted by respondcnt l{os_S to 7 over the lands heid by thc dcccascd pattadar Ramana Reddy and after conducting a detailed cnl,.liry and considcring the objcctions submitted by thc pctitioncls, pass appropriate reasoned orders stl ictly in accordancr: u-rth law. .- '': 'rS ii-i'E-.;l '+ :1- 'i :.,:- 'r 4 .JVB R. .I \\ I .l 88i6 2Ul5
5. \\/ith thc abovc obscrvations, this Writ Petitl n is disposccl of. There srall be no order as to costs \s a sequcl. the miscellancous petitions Dr9 15jnS. ii anl', shall stancl closcd 1 SD/- M. JAWAHAR AS{;lYNr REGI REDDY STRAR //TRUE COPY// TION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secret: rtlt' State of Telangana, FlYd erabad
2. The District collector, Karimnagar District 3' The Revenut; Divisionl officer' Karimnagar, Karimnaqzir listrict 4. The Tahasilc ar' Manakondur mandal' Karimnagar disl 5. One CC to SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' Adv:crrte IOPUCI 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the Sla'e of Telangana Iour] Two CD CoPies 7 r BSK I'\'l- HIGH COURT DATED:0310'712025 i l I I i i I ! i I I I I I I I i ..;I.,\1. '(.. r' 1.!I ?1?l I ,"'t. ,.', ^<- ,/.' .i. ' I'--:i i'a- 1 ORDER WP.No.18836 of 2025 ..,. ,,,', \il - DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS /a /z 4/ta ./t;'