✦ Telangana High Court

Arbindi Kiranmayi @ Ch Kiranmayi,'Wo. Chinthala Ravindranath yadava v. Ihe. State. of_ Telangana, Throlgh Station House Officer, P.S. Nagole, Rachakonda Commissionerale

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With this direction, this Criminal petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Considering that the alleged offences are punishable with impnsonment for a term less than seven years, and in view of the petitioners' willingness to participate in the investigative process' the petitioners are hereby directed to appear before the Station House Officer (SHO), Nagole Police…

Judgment

#1. Arbindi Kiranmayi @ Ch Kiranmayi,'Wo. Chinthala Ravindranath yadava D/o. Late Sri Venkataramaiah, aged about 53 years, Occ. Household, R/o. FIat No. 1103, 11th floor, TNR Vishnavi Shikar Apartments, L.B.Nagar, R.R.District, T.G

#2. Sri. Harsha Bashetty, S/o Raghunandan Rao Bashetty, aged about 27 years, Occ. Business, resident of H.i.lo.3-'13-9 4t2o1b, Madhuia Nagar, near Ahdhra Bank Ramanthapur, Amberpet,'Hyderabad, Telangana -50001 3

#3. Sri.Ch. Sahadeva Rao, S/o. Late. Narayana, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Bussiness, R/o. Plot No.6A,7B, H.No. '12-14lA, Road No 64,-Arunodaya colony, Nagole, Hyderabad, Telangana.

#4. Smt. Saritha Miriyala, D/o. Dayanand Rao Juvaddi, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Household, H.No. 1-3-68 Flat No.203, Hemabhaskara resiijency Apartment, Habsiguda Hyderabad, Telangana.

#5. Smt. Uma Devi Juvvadi, Wo. Dayanand Rao Juvaddi, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Household, H.No. 6-8211 , Gorregundam, Maddutla, Karimnagar. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1 & 4 to 7 AND I 2 Ihe. State. of_ Telangana, Throlgh Station House Officer, P.S. Nagole, Rachakonda Commissionerale Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High eourt Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, Telangana. Chinthala Ravindranath Yadav, S/o.Chinthala Lawman Rao Yadav, aged 52 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 16-2-73BlEl11 , Asmangadh, Neai T.V. Tower, Malakpet, Amberpet, Hyderabad, T.G. - 500 036. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceeding in F.l.R. No. 389/2025, Dated24-05-2025 on the file of P.S. Nagole, Rachakonda for the alleged offences under section 406,420,465,468,471,506 R/w. 34 of l.P.C. against the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1.41o7. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may !e qleggeo to grant Stay of ail further proceedings in F.r.R No. 38d/2025, Dated 24-05-2025 on the file of p.s. Nagole, Rachaionda for the alreged offences under section 406,420,465,468,471,506 R/w. 34 of t.p.C. Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1, 4 lo 7 including dispense of personal attEndance of the Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1, 4 to 7, pending disposal of the above criminal Petition. "against This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri A MANIKANTA, Advocate for the petitioner and sri. JTTHENDER RAo vEERAMALLA, Assistant Public prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for Respondent no.2 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURAALE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8183 OF 2025 ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (tor short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings in Crime No-389 of 2025 of Nagole Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, against the petitioners.

#2. The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 4 to 7 in Crime No.389 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 42O.465.468.471 and 506 read with 34 of lndian Penal Code, 1860.

#3. Heard Mr. A. Manikanta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State. Learned counsel for the petitioners respectfully submits that

#4. although the petitioners are fully committed to cooperate with the investigative process, they are apprehensive of potential coercive action being taken against them. This concern arises from the fact that' despite the alleged offence being punishable with imprisonment for a term less than seven years, the investigating police authority has not yet issued any notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nlegank Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) lt is further submitted that the I ) z * ,--'1 - petitioners have no intention of evading the investigation and are willing to extend full cooperation to the authorities ln light of these circumstances, learned counsel prays that appropriate directlons be issued to the concerned police officials to proceed in accordance with law by issuing a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS' thereby safeguarding the petitioners from any unwarranted coercive measures'

#6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition I have perused the materials on record

#7. Considering that the alleged offences are punishable with impnsonment for a term less than seven years, and in view of the petitioners' willingness to participate in the investigative process' the petitioners are hereby directed to appear before the Station House Officer (SHO), Nagole Police Station, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' Upon such appearance' the lnvestigating Officer shall issue notice to the petitioners under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, in connection with Crime No'389 of 2025' and shall proceed further strictly in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v' State of Biha/ ' Simultaneously, the petitioners are directed to extend full cooperation to the lnvestigating Officer during the course of the investigation' I (2014) 8 SCC 273 \ \ ----7 3 B. With this direction, this Criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN NT REGISTRAR A //TRUE COPY// To, Class Ranga Reddy District at f"e flagai. s CTION OFFICER 1 The I Additionar Junior civir Jy!g_e.c.um r Additionar JuUciar Magistrate of First 2. The Station House Officer, Nagole p.S., Rachakonda. 3. One CC to SRt. A MANIKANTA Advocate tOpUCl 4 Two ccs to PUBLTG pRosEcuroR, High court for the state of rerangana 5. Two CD Copies louTI MKN/PSL s HIGH COURT DATED:03 tOilZOzS ORDER CRLP.No.8183 of 2025 ! r0JUI m .;, :! t .i q-{.:tr,,.,rr:rri,o DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION @oi'uN

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With this direction, this Criminal petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 35(3), 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 8183 of 2025). ← Search more judgments