Writ Petition No. 23596 of 1999 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Sri R.N. Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for EPF Organization has brought to my notice that the entire money recoverable from the writ petitioner establishment towards the arrears of contribution of their employees has been recovered. It was also brought to my notice that the writ petitioner establishment has now become defunct and it is not functioning as such. Hence, this Writ Petition was posted for judgment today so as to enable the learned counsel for the writ petitioner to obtain necessary instructions. None appears even today on behalf of the writ petitioner. In view of the statement made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents that the entire money recoverable from the writ petitioner establishment has already been recovered by the EPF Organization, in accordance with Section 8 of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the fact that the writ petitioner establishment has become defunct, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 29th June 2010
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 — s. 8.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Jun 2010. The bench was NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.