High Court · 2025

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the r,righ'court may oe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly on-e in the natuie of writ of lvlandamus declaring inaction of respondents in taking action of puriuant to petitioner apprication dated 27 -o1-2025 made seeking 1o prant siones in accordance to survey and rocation sketch as being ileg-ar and arbitrary and consequently direct respondents to take action basing on application aated iz-o,t- 2025 and to plant boundary stones in accordance to survey and rocation sketch of petitioner agricultural land in sy. No. 1550/1 an extent of Ac. 2-07 Gts. situated in Sujathanagar Village and Mandar, Bhad radri-Kothagucieni District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R.R.KALYAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 18 712 of 2o25 ORDER: This Writ PctiLion, under Arriclc 226 of the Constitulion ol India, is filed sceking the lollou'ing rclief: '-...to issue o uit, orcler or (ltectrott tnore parlicularlg one i' the ftoture nfWitclfMandamL.tscleclctnttgillQ.ttoll.)frespondetStlLtaktngactionof ]ui";r,'o-i, ,lo' p"trnor., appt,it'o'r (1Qte(7 27 01 2025 rtrqde seekinq to 'plolri ttorr",t in o".ordo,rii to sutueLl (or1 loc(lttott skelch "s being illegal i-na' arUitrary and- consequentlg drrict responclenrs Io take action basing- ln.^ ipito"tio" dated 2i.o1 )o-)5 (rrt(i ro plunt bou dant 'stones ln to suruea an Locltiot I skcrctr o/ petitioner-ogicuhural lqnd itt ,iroiicrn " sir.Uo. t SSOt 1 an eiterfi of Ac.2'07 Cts 'sit{{ated in Sujathon'tgar Vtllage airl Mortlat, lJlndndrr Kor horltt'l' 'tt /)t\lncr" " . 2,. Considered thc submissions ol thc lcarned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L. Ravinder, learncd Assistant Government Pleader for Rcvcnue appcaring lor the rcsporldcnts' and with their consent this writ petition is disposed ol at the admission stagc' It is stated that the petitioner is the owncr an(l possessor of to an cxtcnt of Ac.2 07 Gts situated 1n land in S-v,No.1550/ 1 Sujathanagar Village and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District pctitioner has submitted an F-Line It is further stated that the application dated 03.O2 2022 secking to conduct survey over the subject ProPertY, and alter reccipt ol the said application, the issued no[ice claled 17.02 2022 propostng lo respondents have conduct survey on the subjcct lands on 22 'O2 '2022 ' but u'hen the -- l respondents have not proceeded to conduct survey in terms or the said notice, the petitioner filed W.p. No. 194O6 of 2022 and this Court vide orclcr daLed 26.04.2022 directed the respondents to conclude the survcy u.irhin six r.l,eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the ordcr. I t is rhc further staLed that in tcrms of thc said order, thc respondcnts have conductcd survey but lailed to lix thc boundaries/ kadd i stones in terms of the Rules, therelbre. the petlttoner \.as constrained to lile C.C.No.20 35 ot 2024 and this Court vide order, 0g. I1.2024 disposcd of the said contempt casc giving liberty to the pet irioner to makc a lresh rtpplication by paying necessary charges for fixation and localization of the boundaries of the subject land in terms ol thc survey conducted earlier. It is further stated rhal evt:n alter the observations made in C.C.No.2035 of 2024, thc responden t had u,illfully and deliberately not fixed the boundary stones in pursuance of the survey conductetl pursuant to the F Line application, clated O3.02.2 O22, theretore, the petitioner was constrained to filr: C.C.No. 1lZ3 ot 2O2S and, this Court vide order, 08. 11 .2024 disposed of the said contempt case granting liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps if the respon<ient has not fixed the boundaries alter conducting survey as per the provisions of the Telangana Survey and Boundartes Act, 1923 and the Rules made thereunder. I

4.. Le arned counsel for tl're petitioner submiLted thal in pursuance of the said orders ol this Court, the lletitioner has approached respondent No.3 requesting to fix [he boundaries/ kaddi sLones in terms of the Rules, and the petitioncr is ready to bear the expenditurc for fixation of the boundaries/ kaddi sloncrs-

5. [n view of the above, as i[ is slated that the petitioncr is ready to bear the expenditure for hxation of thc boundaries / kaddi stones, this Court is of the opinion that ends o[ justice u oul<l be met il the respondents are directed to hx lhe boundaries/k:rddi stones for thc extent of lands for which survcl'' has becn condltctcd tf any objections are raised by the adjacent o$'ners lor fixingl the boundary stones, the Tahsildar is directed to seek necressary police aid/assistance for fixation of the boundaries in terms of the Telangana Survey and Boundarics Act, 1923 anri lhe Rules made thereunder, \*"ithin a period of 15 <1a1's lrom thc date o[ receipt ol a copy of this order. 6 With the above observations, this $'rit petition is disposed of No order as to cosLs As a sequcl, the miscellancous petitions pcndingr,'ll4gl', shall stand closed ASSt\\J SD/.U. SUDHA TANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Princioal Secretary' Revenue Department' Secretariat' State of

2. The District Collector, Kothagudem, Bhadradri_Kothagudem District. 3 The Tahsildar, Sujathanagar, Sujathanagar Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem 4. One CC to SRI R.R.KALYAN, Advocate. tOpUCl t to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of retangana ff,ir?tt 6. Two CD Copies. BSK BS \c{' HIGH COURT DATED:0210712025 ORDER WP.No.18712 ot 2025 ( J '):' I i o 1[ IiE? ?t?5 -..\ ', \\ -.r,:.i :,i i: .. -:J.. ' :..' -t ,-_-.i: t, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 4 r) u"RSn tr*