✦ High Court of India · 12 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Aug 2025
Length
1,171 words

2-SmtN-snehalatha,Wo'sriT.Srikanthagedabout38Vears'occ-Pvt Emolovee rrat ruo eoi]niilv"C;;il;*"v' o-uo't-t 11/1/C' Rashavendra boi$:llionj;i,i..,t.ilri"gffi pallv Mandal' Ransa Reddv District' ...Respondent No.2 /De-facto-Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the lVlemorandum'Li Ground. of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pi.r*J t. may quash flre cC rlo 974 of 2o2o' dated- 03'03 2020 on the file of the ir nooitL""r Junior civil LuJge-cum-x Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, KukatpallY. I.A. NO:1OF 2025 Between: Smt N.Snehalatha, Wo Sri T Srikanth aged about 3g years, Occ_ pvt Employee FIat No 302, Happv Residencv o.r.ro r_i'ir;iL, Rr;H:lora cctony, Kondapur, Seritingampaily Mandat, Ranga Reday Di#t"i"r"""" " 'Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Defacto comprainant in r.A.Nos.1 and 2 0r 2025 AND

1. Sri T.Srikanth, S/o Sri T.Srinivas aged about 45 year,s, Occ_ pvt Employee,

2. Smt T.Vasantha, Wo Sri T.Srinivas aged 68 years, Occ_ House Wife ...petitioner No.l/Al in l.A.Nos.I and 2 ol 2025

3. Sri T.Srinivas. S/o ...Petitioner No.1/A2 in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2O2S Govt Servant Late T.Sundar Murthy, Aged about 14 years, Occ_ Retd. (1 to 3 are Reside-nt, of H..No 1J-.15_57, plot No.252, Road No.2, Doctors cotony, saroornagar HyderJbrt_soo6etl, , '", ' I:; tt;ii8'r1,1f,isP?13; J,Li|..,l?J8tff H:ioffi cerGa ch ibowri po r ice station ...Petitioner No.1/A3 in l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ol 2OZs Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances il;;r5i;,,utition, thr: High Courr may be stated in the Memorandum or Orounas pleased to grant permission to compromise t;; ;;";; case rn the in the justice. "f l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section- 3sg (2) of BNSS praying that irr the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar ietiiion, ftre, Higr, court ,1, o" pleased to record the compromise and quash tne ccrvo 974 0f 2020, on the fire of ll Additionar Junior civir Judge-cum-X ebaitionrirrJiciar Magistrate of First crass, Kukatpally in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon r,eiiinf ir,u""rgrm"nt.; of sri pinnu Naga Raju, Advocate for the petitioneis and thE sii-titt""o"i: i; ;#il;ii, Additional Pubric prosecutor on beharf of it . No.1 , and none appeared. for the Respondent No.2. 'h.spono"nt The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/and CRIMIN AL PETITION No.8089 ot 2025 ORDER: ltissubmittedbylearnedcounselappearingforthepetitionersaswell as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition' the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly' l'A'Nos'1 and 2 of 2o2Shauebeenfiledtorecordthecompromisebetvveenthemandto compound the offences'

2. Vide order daled2207'2025' this Court directed the parties along with their respective counser to appear before the secretary, High court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report'

3. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by thisrCourt' the parties have appeared and the Secretary' High Court Legal Services Committee' has identified the parties and submitted a report' dated 05'08'2025 and the same is placed on record' ln view of the above' l'A'Nos'1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed' 4. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.gT4of2o2oonthefileofthellAdditionalJuniorCivilJudge.cum.X Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Kukatpally against the petitioners/accused Nos'1 to 3 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners 2 fr\l E'TD, J Crl.P 8089 2025 'nry) to the Director, payrng an amount of Rs'5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand sainik welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.S21gg926219, state Bank of lndia, shantinagar Branch (2oo7o), rFSc code:SBrN00 2ooro, MrcR No.500004057) and Rs.5,000t (Rupees Five Thous,and Only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same beforer the Registry. Miscefianeous apprications, if any pending, shail stand crosed. ,s'#.y3I3,lJHl'A ./ //TRUE COPYII SECT N OFFICER To, Nasar, Masistrate Kukarpary at prashantni : i!!#y"yetropolitan, i i}3ifffi ifffi1,::*,ffi rn:':ri"' :lt1a nsa na a'l Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/_ ( Rupees Ten thr for the petitio n",.,.T::*,1,, ;:.;"",1 :HI il#:, ::n "Director, sa n k we ra re,]ij"?l,ll, ];ijl, !iT,l:, il"ffi:11""1*. i",ll; to the Terangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and fired Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 87431 of 2O2S Dated 21 0g.2025. ;rl 11."", *7r' NVB/PSL \q/ Lli ,w I f .t:.' ,:, ' -r \ /6. 09 sEP zffi ',i,].,_.' - HIGH COURT DATED:1 2t0Bt2O2S ORDER lA.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.80B9 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND t.A.Nos.1 & Z OF 2}zs t, co\' ' ^q€,{ ku^t '4d\d(g\ '' i .) 2IN rIlE HoN',BLE HIGH couRr'oFJXRf ^ ruRE FoR rlIE srArE oF ATi{YDERABAD cRLPNo PffPo rn t Betlveen

1. Sd T.Srikanth S/o Sri T.Srinivas aged about 45 Years' Occ : Pvt EmPloYee

2. Smt T.Vasantha' W/o Sri T.Srinivas *r;- Y.u", ott' House wife 1 Sri T.Srintvas i/o Lur" T'sundar M*l]: Aged about 74 Years' Ucc: Retd. Govt. Scrvant ,Petitioner No 1/Ai P etitioner No 2/A2 . PetitionerNo 3/A3 I l I I I I "' $:*t*w;|jl,,:,":l!li:ft AND ,,, 1 . The State of Telang-ana The Station House Olttcen,, Cachibowli Police Statton' *.r. O, the Pubtic Prosecutor'rd1u s\1l<v.ql"ad ' 2. SmtN Snehalatha W/o Sri T'srikanth Years, occ : Pvt EmPloYce i"i;;38 ;?;;N" 302. HaPPY ResidencY' iit".i i iI)r rcl Raghavendra colonv' [;;;;;;" serilingamPalrY Mandar' Ranga ReddY Dist' GdD $esPondent No1 . . ..ResPondent No 2/ De-facto ComPiainant JOINT MEMO May it Please Your LordshiPs' It is submitted that the petitioner No 1 is the husband' No 2 & 3 are the No 2/de-1acto conrPlainant is mother and father of Accusecl No 1' the Respondent \ the rvife of the petitioner No liAl, have amicably settle(r alr the cascs pencling . between them in different courts & entered into this conrpromise. Ilence, the Respondent No 2/de-facto complainant has 'No objection' t,r quash the cc No 974 of 2020, on the lile of the II Additioial Junior civil Judgc-cum-X Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First ctass, Kukatpally ancl pass such other orcler or orders that [his court ma1' deem fit and proper in the interest ofjusticc ancr circumsta,ces of the ,.'-}9 Petit r0ner No 1/A1 T.V.***#,ok *,r' Petitioner No 2/A2 -J--:--\J.-.*- Petitioner No 3/A3 Counsel r Pet rtioners /Al to A.3 Cou De-fac Place: Hyderabad Date: 3o.06.2025 MLs-tr'."- Re:spondent No 2 - (- ,(/-,*ll p mplainant o 2l

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments