✦ High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Sep 2025
Length
1,142 words

1. Smt. Lakshmi Bayi, Wo. Late Govind Rao, Aged about 38 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. Flat No.202, Nakshtra Enclave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

2. Khan Dobha, S/o. Ldrte Govind Rao, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. Flat No. 202, Nakshtra Enclave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

3. Dattathri, S/o. Late Govind Rao, Aged about 17 years, Occ. Nil. R/o. Flat No. 202, Nakshtra Enclave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

4. Vaijinath, S/o. Sangam, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. Flat No. 202, Nakshtra Enclave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of execution of the Judgment and Decree of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- Cum - The Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad dt. 16.05.2019, made in MVOP.No. 832 of 2015. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir .umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou- may be pleased to vacate the stay orders in lA.No.1/2019 in MACMA.No.3264 o. 2019, dt.25-09-2019 and by allow this petitioners herein to withdraw the, same a thout furnishing any security. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI N.VASUDEVA REDDY (SC :OR RTC) Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: SRI K. RAJASHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4:-- The Court made the following: JUDGMENT ,pthd^/0\A'14'f6t to{i' HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA M.A.C.M.A. No.3264 OF 2019 IUDGEMENT: The present appeat was referred to Lok Adatat' On 13.09.2025, authorized representative of appettants /TGSRTC has appeared before Lok Adatat and stated that the TGSRTC has decided not to pursue the present appea[ and seeks to withdraw the appeat' Recording the said. submission, the Lok Adatat passed the award on '11'09'2025 and the matter was settted before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the same, the present appeal is dlsposed of in terms of Z. the Award, dated 13.09.2075, passed by the Lok Adatat' There shatl be no order as to costs. 3 Registry is directed to annex the Lok Adalat award copy atong with th is order. Miscettaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shatl stand ctosed' SD/- M. OSMAN ALI B ASSISTANT REG R //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER onal Chief Judge City Civil The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-Cum-l Additi Court Hyderabad.

2. One CC to SRI N.VASUDEVA REDDY(SC FOR RTC) Advocare tOpUCl 3. One CC to SRI K.RAJASHEKAR Advocate tOpUCl I i I i 1t I E I \ I I I I J I I \ To, Two CD Copies % (Enclosed a copy of Award Passed by Lok Adalat) ,l I I l i ! I I I I I ,l t I i f I I I . i I, i I I HIGH COURT DATED:2510912025 JUDGEMENT MACMA.No.3264 of 2019 , ,t (. I s t4 6 t / t,g !0;16 ! $', I l) .-::: 1I I IrI: r] * DISPOSING THE MACMA INTERMS OF qWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT o\ \1 ,\ V, lhe staie ol 1 li:. 1 I I I I I I BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD) r Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central ActI \ Date:1 3-09-2025 Present:'l . Hon'ble Justice Sri G.V. Seethapathy, (Former JudBe of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh High Court) Chairman

2. Sri K. Vasantha Rao, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.No.32 64 of 2019 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.832 of 2O15 (0n the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunal - cum The Court of the Chief Judge: City Civil Court: Hyderabad) Between: 1. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (Prior to bifurcation known as APSRTC), Represented by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Cross Roads, Hyderabad.

2. Tetangana State Road Transport Corporation (Prior to bifurcation known as APSRTC), Represented.by its Depot Manager, Hayathnagar-2, Bus Ddpot, Hayathnagar, R.R.District. ...Appettants/ Respondents AND

1. Smt.Lakshmt Bayi, W/o. Late Govind Rao, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Ftat No.202, Nakshtra Enctave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

2. Khan Dobha, S/o. Late Govind Rao, Aged abgut 20 years, Occ: Nit, R/o. Ftat No.202, Nakshtra Enctave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

3. Dattathri, S/o. Late Govind Rao, Aged about 17 years, Occ: Ni[, R/o. Ftat No.202, Nakshtra Enctave, Akbarbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

4. Vaijinath, S/o. Sangam, Aged about 70 years, Occ: Nit, R/o. Ftat No.202, Nakshtra Enctave, Akbarbagh, Matakpet, Hyderabad. ..i:'-'l:.. '.i.:t:. l-;rr':l "1:]. (Respondent No.3 being minor represented by his mother and natura[ guardian !--91;-r.,,: ,.,; Respondent No.'l herein) "Respondents / Petitiondrsr .' :, ' ._.. .: .i... in -ri . AWARD i. , This is an appeal fited by the ApPetlant(s) - Tetangana 1 . Corporation, chattenging the.order dated 16-05-2019 prt of 2015 by Motor Accidents Cta'ims Tribunal cum -f I Judge: City CiviI Court: HYderabad. t. Sn P.N.M.Chary, Law Officer The Authorizecl Appettant(s)/TGSRTC has appeared and represented t decided not to pursue the present appeal and withdrawing the aPpeat. 1: \ -' ,f I 'I :ate Road Transpoit ' sed in MVOP No.B32 . Court of the Chief representative of tat lhe Corporation herefore they are'

3. The said representation is recorded and the apf( withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree of betow. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to tht' deposited by the Corporation/TGSRTC(s) within (2) mor aI is dismissed as the Court/Tribunat :taimant(s) shatI be hs from the date of receipt of copy of the award, atong with interest.

4. On such deposit, the Responden t/ Ctaimant(s) is/are p: his/her/their respective amount/s as per the avr Tr ibunat/MACT.

5. ln case, the parties subsequentty come to know ,t appeat/cross objection, they are given liberty to . rnitted lo withdraw rd passed by the ,out fiting of cross ;eek recat[ of th is Order/Award.

6. Court fee paid on this appeal sha[[ be refunded. 7. N6 costs. LAW OFFI .II AE&$Eilqge$ffidenbBil. na State Road Trdns ort Cor orati, n Telan CHAIRMAN MBER SER tlutft LOK o * aie 011 E *

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments