High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 o The State of Telangana, Fep.by its principal Secretary to Government, Home uepartment, I S Secretariat, Saifabad. Hyderabad. The Director General of Police, Telanangana State, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Waranga[, Warangal District,Telangana. Ilq PggrlY Commissioner of Police, East zone Warangal, Warangal District,Telangana. The lnspector of Police, Athamakur police Station, Athamakur Mandal, Warangal District (Rural). The Stationllouse.Officer, Athamakur police Station, Athamakur Mandal, Waranagal Distric (Rural). t\/otam Satish, S/o. Not known ,Age. Major. Occ. Sub lnspector of police, Athamakur Police station, R/o. Athamakur porice station,'Athamatur uihoat, Waranagal Distric (Rural). Arisham, jayarylqtly, S/o. Late Sammaiah, Age.42 years. Occ. Agricutture, f-vo. H.No. 4-12212, Neerukurra Virrage, Athamakur Mandar, wara"ngar Disirict (Rural). Arsham 9araiah, S/o. Late Gattumallu, Occ.Agriculture, Rl/o. Neerukulla Village, Athamakur Mandal,Warangal District (Rural).

Petition under A(icle 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court ha-y be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the natuie of writ of ltrlandamus, declaring the acts, things and deeds of Respondent No.6 to 7 in ...RESPONDENTS ai€ + ::d!?&=: harassing the petitioner by calling to the police station and making phone calls to the Petitioner to settle the issue with Respondent No. 8 and I pertaining to the petitioner's agricultural land an extent of Ac-0.16 Guntas in Survey No- 13/A'1 , Ac- 0.11 Guntas in Survey No- 14lAl and 141D4, Ac-1.08 Guntas (making a total of Ac- 1.35 Guntas as the same is a contiguous Single piece of land ) and an extent of Ac-3.00 guntas comprising in Survey No-'l4/D/1 making all together Ac-4.35 Guntas situated at Neerukulla Village of Athamakur Mandal, warangal District (Rural) is illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust against to the Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of lndia, consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 6 to I not to harass the Petitioner by calling the petitioner to the Respondent No.6-Police Station lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 7 not to harass the petitioner by calling to the Respondent No.6 police station or any other manner, pending disposal of Writ Petition and pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to 9: --- The Court made the following: ORDER ,,' I I I L i1 I I I I I l I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 18499 of 2025 ORDER lieeLrd lcarncd counsel for the petitioner, learned Government pleader lor Home appe:rring for respondent Nos.1 to 6, and with their consent the writ Pctitir,rn is raken up for hearing and disposal at admission slagc.

2. Ilaving regard to Lhe manncr of d;sposal of thc writ petition and [he naturc oI li-s in'rh'cd, thrs courr is of Lhc Lhat .otica to unofficral to 9 is not necessary lor ar.ljudication of the present Writ 'ier,v respondent Nos.7 Petition

3. 'lhe case ol'the petitioner, in brief, is that thc 7th respondent, who is worl<rng as SuL-,-lnspector of policc of Lhe 6.h respondent 1rolice Station is calling thc pctitioner ovcr phone to come to police sration to settre the issue with lhc unofficial respondent Nos.8 & 9, r'vhich action o[ LI..c respondcnts- autltoritics it js contendccl as htghJy rllcgal, arbirr.ary ancl ir violation of ArLii:lcs 1.1, l9 & 2 i ol tirc ConsrrLuriurr o1 lr.rdia.

1. Per contro, Iearned (iovernmenr l)ieaclcr for I-romc appearing on bchalf of offici:rl rcspondcnts, r.r,'hilc denying thc \,,'rit avcrmcnts, u,ould submit that the 9'h respondent in llre writ petition l'ras approached thc respondcnts-authorities and lodged a complaint/report against the petitioner on 1g.06.2025, that on the 9,. rcspondcnt lodging the above complaint with thc 6.h respondcnt, Lhe authorjties havc made a GD entry, Look up preliminerry enqui::i,, ald for the purllosc of causiRg prclimina,-;, r nquir),, L];r.y havc callcci tlic pctiLioncr to cornc Lo {Le ttolice station with rck:varrr. documr:nts. \ I I I I i I I I I : 2 5'Learncci(ior,ernmentPleaderforl{omefurtl-rcrsubmitsthatthe authorities after r:ausing prcliminarl' enquiry and on noticing that thc contents of tl're complairlt lodcccl bl- thc 9'h respondcr-rt herein being in relation to a civil clispu Lc. har"c r:losccl thc saicl complaint as ''civil in nature" on 29.O6.2025; and that ll'rc autllr-'ritics cxccpt causing prcliminary enquiry into the complait'tt lodgcd by the 9 ' rcspondent, arc not hzrrasstng the petitloner by calling him to the police slation or cocrcing thc pctitioncr to settle thc issuc with unofhcial respondent Nos.8 & 9 ' Lcart-rcrl (io\.crnmcllt Plcirclcr Ior !{ome submits t}ral bctwecn thc datc ol 6. complaint loclgcrl 111' thc 9'' rcsponclcrrt hcrein ar-rd thc closurc o[ t]-re said complaint b1'tl-rc rcspot-rd ents-atlt horitcis after c:ru sing -rreliminary cnquin'' the petitjortcr ancl the urrolTir:ial rcsponclent No 9 scem to havc arrived al a settlcmsnt rn thc Prcscnc:c o[ r'ill:"qc clclcrs' rvith u'hi<:h the respondcnls authorilics arc no \\'aY conccrncd' 7 Tl-rc aforesaicl submissions rnade by thc learned Government Pleader for Home arc takcn on rccord In Vrew of tl-rc albrcsaicl submissior-rs ar-r<l takir-rg notc of the fact that g. though ilritiallv :r complaint agalnst thc petitioner has be en lodgcd by the 9th rcspondenl on 18.06 2025 1her resprtn d clnts- alrthoritics after making a GD entry ajld causing prcliminari' crrquiry having closcd the samc ot 29 06 '2025 as ,,civi1 in nature", thrs courl is of the rnew that the rcspondents-authorlties arc to bc directed t-rot to interfere with lhc life and iibcrty of the petitioncr' cxcept in accordance lvith law. 3 9 Subject to the above direction, the Writ petition is disposed of, No orcler as to costs lO. Consequently, miscella:reous petitions, if any, penrling shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGIS RAR SECTI OFFICER 1 . The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, TS Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, Telanangana State, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 3. The Commissioner of Police, Warangal, Warangal District,Telangana. 4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, East zone Warangal, Warangal District,Telangana.

5. The lnspector of Police, Athamakur Police Station, Athamakur Mandal, Warangal District (Rural).

6. The Station House Officer, Athamakur Police Station, Athamakur Mandal, Waranagal Distric (Rural).

7. One CC to SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies KKS LS pv i l i I t I I I I I I ! I I l l HIGH COURT DATED:01 10712025 ORDER WP.No.18499 of 2025 ,''.,.: ..-. -.: lriia .-11 C',r 10 stP 2r5 c, * D555,119t{ (,() DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t*t"A*d Y6p A:t "