Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B PRAKASH RAO
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
Judgment
Cause title
Ravinutala Katyayani, W/o D.Syam Prasad, Sri Ravindra Vidyalaya, Lalpet, Guntur, Guntur District. AND ..... PETITIONER
1 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The District Educational Officer, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Govt.of A.P.Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the proceedings L.Dis. No.915/C1/2004 dated 4-3-2004 issued by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional, violating Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and issue consequential direction declaring the date of birth of the petitioner as 1-6-1947, instead of 5-5-1946 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till the age of superanuation, treating the date of birth of the petitioner as 1-6-1947 instead of 5-5-1946. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following :
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. ________________ VGB
28.04.2005 To
The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur, Guntur Dist. The District Educational Officer, Guntur, Guntur Dist. The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2 CCs to the G.P. for School Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
2 CD copies.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.