High Court · 2025

'circumstan-ces stated in the Memorandr#"r 6-.r"0. of criminal Petition, the High court may i""orOr relating to CC No.1 1999 of 2021 be oleased toto call tor ti.,J' LJ;";"ivti nooitionat chief Metropolitan Magistrate' oending on the fite "f ",.rr.Jri'vl HvJerabad, 'no I.A. NO:2OF 2025 q'""r' the same in the interest of justice' "-nG Petition under Section 528 of BNSS prayilg that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand'#;; ;;';;;Li9'1ti1;lFetition' the High court mav be oleased to stay all t"ti"i'ploJ*o-ing; c c'l'lo'1 1999 of 2021 pending on the fire of rearned xvrr nooitl]n5ifi;ilpJita-n Masistrate' Nampallv' Hvderabad' p""J"g qr""n petition in the interest of justice' lr*F:,# t.A. NO: 3 0F 2025 Between: Nagarvarapu Madan Anancl MohanlVurthy, S/o N. Madan Mohand Murthv F/o Plot No 396, Defence 6i;;;, ''"'' qged about 40 yrs, Occ. Ad, barnrkpuri Post, secunderavocate AND ... Petitioner/Res pondent No.2 Business. R/o Botineni uous6, viria'ri".'i'il;lri"prr, Hyderabad.

1. Ranineni Anuo cha-kravarthy, Sl9 R, venkat Rao, Aged about 42 yrs, occ ' 3:i.:tflfrllr;lXnoana' Rep. bv its Pubtic prosecutor, Having office at Higjh ..Res pondents/petitioner/A2 Petition under Section j!O(O) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandrm or crounJ. ;i;;#;;i i,etition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission.to-tt putiii*"r'iointer into compromise with the respondent No..t in C C No..t1,ee oi r.ri ;;;;;; on the fite of tearned XV, tvasist*iu'-r'r'nipJrv'"'iri"Jlo'0, p;"i''il;,;;".il, fliii"ilX'.*i':??;lrt.;n " r.A. NO :4 oF 2025 Between: Nagarvarapu Madan Ana nrt hanJvlurthy, S/o N. Madan Mohand Murthv_ 39i"16',?iii3,l3;.",,ffi jj;j:;i" nv,i prdi illl ii6l'iLr".ce corony,' .lVI-o AND ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2 1 *"r-:tfiY.:llfi:Tgana' Rep bv its Public Prosecutor, Having orrice at Hish ...RespondenURespondent No.1 2 Ranineni Anuo Chakravarthy, S/o R- Venkat Rao, Aged about 42 yrs. Occ. B u si n ess, Rr/o B o r i n en i Ho u s6, vi r r"'rvo ;;'il.;; i;;Iir,jrrydera bad. ...Respondents/petitioner/A2 Petition under section.3sg(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of_Grounds of cr;iln;i'ir"tition, the High court may be pleased to record the Compromi* i, O"t*""n the petitioner and the ,s resoondent No. 2 in C'C No 11999 of 2021 pendino on the file of learned XVll Rdditional Metropolitan M';Li;;; N;,.np"rrv"nvoetJuad' pending quash petition in the interest of justice' ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof "Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Grounds of Criminal Sri Mohammad Adnan' Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jlthender Rao Veeramalla, Additional P'bli" Prosec'tor on behalf of the Respondent No'l and of Ms Niloufer Afshan, Advocate for the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER -t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI I.A.N os.3 AND 40F 2025 ln/And CRIMT NAL P ETITloN No.8 287 0F 2025 coM MoNO RDER This Criminal petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya 2023 (for short ,BNSS, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023,) seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner/Accused No.2 in c'c No' 1 1 999 0f 2021 0n the fire of the XV, Additionar chief .Vletroporitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, arising out of Crime No.306 ot 2O2O of Jubilee Hills police Station, Hyderabad.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.2 in the above C.C. which was taken cognizance for the offences punishable under sections 420 and 406 read with 34 of the lndian penal Code, 1g60 (for short ,lpC,). 3. Heard IVr. tVlohd. Adnan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr'Jithender Rao Veeramara, rearned Additionar pubric prosecutor, representing respondent No..l-State and f\4s.Niloufer Afshan, learned counsel for responden t No.2ldeJacto complainant.

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingry, respondent No.2lde-facto comprainant filed l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into "orprffiii" and by recording the setflement to quash the proceedings against the _petitione. r/accused No.2 in C.C.No.1 1999 of 2021 J 2

5. This Court vide order, dated 04'07'2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement The SecretarY, High Court Legal services committee, has submitted report, dated 1B'O7 '2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective -counsel and also on ofAadharCards/ldentityCardsandtheenquiriesrevealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into verification settlemenVcomPromise I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and

6. perused the materials on record'

7. Having considered the allegations' the nature of charged offence i.e. Section 420 aod406 IPC' alleged against the petitioner/accused No'2 and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace between the parties' in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v- State of Puniab and anothey' and Anit Mishra v' State of u.P.2i State of Madhya Pradesh v' Laxmi Narayan and others3' this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr'P'C't528 of BNSS' 2023' would be in the interest of l-uslioe | 2012 (1o) scc 303 'z 2oz4 INSC 189 3 zo19 (5) scc 688 3 B. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequenfly, all the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.2 in C.C.No.119g9 of 2021 on the file of the XVll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate. Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. ln the above terms, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- U. SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER I To,

1. The XVll Additional Chief Metropolitan l\Iaigstrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Jubitee Hi,s poii" S'ttion, Hyderabad. t Pros;;i;i ri;d, d;l? r;;lile State or reransana at 4. One CC to Sri M5hammad,Adnan, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to r\4s Nitoufer Afaha;, aj;;;;i;TddJci. 6. Two CD Copies l}o""?"",,?l",thePubric N\rBlkam w . I HIGH COURT DATED:25107t2025 t:r' 02 SEP 206 * () l.:'l' ^ r tl .. t .. . ,,. ' COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol202i ln/And CRLP.No.8287 of 2025 DISPOSING THE CRLP AND ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.3&4OF2O2S n I I . l x.I U-r, 4q\ l6a' 25 IN TI'IE HTGH CO URT OFJ TAT S RE AT ATU UDIC EOF TELAN GAN HYD A. ERA BAD FOR THE CrLP. No of 2025 lletvreen Ran ineni AnuP Chakr:avarthY' S/o R. Venkat [{ao, Aged about 42 Yrs, Occ: Business, R/o Bolinenr House, Villa No 7' MadhaPur, HYderabad' And The State of Telangana, ReP. bY its Public Ptosccutot" Having olfice at High Court' Hyderabad. 2 Nagtrverapu Madalt Artand Molran S1o N Madan Mohand "MLrrthY. MurthY, aged about 40 1'rs' C)cc: Advicate, I{/o Plot NO l96' De lence IolonY, SainikPuri Post' Secunderabad Petitioneri A2 Respondents .IOINT MEMoo F COMPROMISE May it Please )'our loldshiP, r\ i l'J l{'{ 26 L That the petitioner and the respondent No.2 have entered into .omp.onrir"_, 2. l-hc respondenr No.2 ha No,,eee l. fhat the peririoner cleare "i202, p.,d;:'::::H:li; Hilr;:*;." ". all clai,s of the responclent No 2' and he is not the complainan/res ponden t No.2 as on today. A due any amount ,o*r.or'o scparate MoU has also been executed in betwecn the prrrtics ",,,r;;;n.;. .1. l'hat pursuant to the recording o1.rh Court, the parries shall have no cla and shail also withdraw any other c said cause of'action. i l l l flence the memo Date' lunc 2025 Respondent No. 2 e compromise befbre rhe Fion,bie Iligh irn of'any uature as against each other ase. ilpending. in conneclion rr,ith the PIJ1Il'IONER r Counsel lor l-(espondent No.2