✦ High Court of India · 11 Jun 2025

Hyderabad' Ranga.Reddy District' v. Batajiswarnapuri Cotony, Erragdtlda

Case Details High Court of India · 11 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
11 Jun 2025
Length
1,073 words

Judgment

1. {. Sgra!.h Re_ddy, W G.Dist, S/o.Sesha Reddy, aged about 23 years, Occ: Nit, R/o.Tediam Post, T.Narasapuram Mandal, Wbst Godavari Distria. M. Harish Kumar, S/o.M.Bhasker Rao, (Driver of the car) aged about 27 Lears, R/o.Flat No.409, Noble Sappire Apartments, Balajiswarniapuri Colony, Erragudda, Hyderabad -18. 3. A. Venkataramani, Wo. Not R/o.F.No.405, Noble Empire, Hyderabad,-18. Known to the Petitioner, aged Major, Balajiswarnapuri Colony, -Erragud-da, ...RESPONDENT Nos. 1 to 3 l.A. NO: 2OF 2O17[MACMAMP. NO: 3387 oF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the execution of the Order and Decree daled 07110120,16 passed in M.V.O.P.No. 408 of 2009, on the file of the Court of the Xll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Cou(, Secunderabad pending disposal of the above MACMA. counsel for the Appefiant: sRr. KATTA LAxMr PRASAD

Gounsel for the Respondents: sMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI PALADUGU The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA M.A.C.M.A.No. 1854 of 2OL7 JUDGMENT: This Appeal 1S preferred by the ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited challenging the order dated 07.10.2016 passed by the XII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, in MVOP No.408 of 2OO9.

2. The matter was referred to the Lok-Adalat, whereupon an Award dated 08.03.2025 was passed. A copy of the Award is placed on record.

3. In that view of the matter, this Appea-l is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 08.O3.2025 passed in the Lok- Adalat. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. \ To, ,/TRUE COPY" SD/- A.V.S. DEPUTY SECTION OFFICER

1. The Xll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court' to SRl. KATTA LAXMI PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI PALADUGU Advocate [oPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies (Enclosed a Copy of Lok-Adalath Award) (r MKN/gh i I I 1 I 1 HIGH COURT DATED:11lOGl2O25 I JUDGMENT MACMA.No.1854 ot 2017 r) ( t SEH 1 I 21il0'J m6 a .\ ) S PA c'l MACMA IS DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF THE LOK-ADALAT AWARD ( r \s r( 1 - BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. lUnder Section 19 of the legol Services Authorities Act, 1?E7 (Centrol Act)l Date:,08=03-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Justice Sri Narsing Rao Nandikonda, (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Sri Md.Nazeeruddin Khkan, Advocate, " Member tutACtulA.Nos.89 of 2017 & 1854 of 2017 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) ttAC[1A.No.89 of 2017 AGAINST {.V.O.P.No.408 of 2009 Addt. Chief Judge, City Civit Court at Secunderabad) (On the fite of the Xll Between:- A.Sarath Reddy,: S/o. Sesha Reddy, Aged 30 years, Occ: Nit, R/o. Tedtam Post, T. NarasJpuram-Mandat, West Godavari District. $' AIID 'APPeltant/Petitioner'

1. M. Harish Kumar, S/o. M. Bhasker Rao, ;l (Driver of the Car), Aged 35 years, R/o. Fl,at No.409, Nobte Sappire Apartments, Bal,aji Swarnapuri Cotony, Erragadda, Hyderabad-1 8.

2. A. Venkataramani, W/o. Not Known to the petitioner, Major, R/o.F.No.405, Noble Empire, Bataji Swarnapuri Cotony, Erragadda, l.lyderabad- 1 8.

3. lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Beside Petrol Pump, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. : M.A.C.M.A..No.1854 of 2017 , ...ResPondents/ResPondents lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited, Req. by its Branch Manager, Beside Petrol Pump, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad' Ranga.Reddy District' ...Appellant/Respondent No. 3 -^tr--.,6^--^--,- Versus ,i.

1. A.Sarath Reddy, 5/o. SeshaReddy, Aged about 23 years, Occ: Nit, R/o. Tediam Post,;T. Narasapuram Mandat, West Godavari District. " i: ri 2. M. Harish Kumar, S/o. M.Bhasker Rao, ..Respondent No. 1 /Claim Petitioner. (Driver of the car) aged about 27 years, R/o.Ftat No.409, Nobte Sappire.Apartments, Batajiswarnapuri Cotony, Erragdtlda, Hyderabad-18. ,,,: :;

3. A. Venkataramani, W/o. Not Known to the petitioner, Aged: Major, R/o.F.No.405, Noble Empire, Batajiswarnapuri Cotony, Er:ragadda, Hyderabad-1 8. ...Respondent No.3/Respondent No.2 t counsel for ctaimant/petitioner/Appettant :-Yll I . -.'..|i r,, ; Ms, p ,-vljlyulak,hmi, Advocate/ ^# sri D.s.(.V._pi","J.niilffi;::t." # counsel for Respondent No.2/lnsurance company: sri Katta Laxmi prasad, Advocate Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager _ Legat Ctaims These appeats having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned counset for the paftie;;;o .ro ihe parties, the fottowing award is passed: AWARD 1' The MACMA No'89 of 2017 has been preferred by the ctaimant whereas the MACMA No.1g54 of 2017 has been prefe.red by the rnsurance comprnr. 2' The Ctaimant/{ppettant/Petitioner atong with his counsel and the Senior atf of Respondent No.2-lnsurance Company have Manager-Legal Ctaims on appeared before th 3. During the pendency ese Appeats, the Ctaimant/Appettant/petitioner and the Respondent No. surance Company have entered into a setttement and in pursuance of the-s,ame, they decided to withdraw their respective appeats by confirming the order passed by the Tribunat/Lower court. 4' The said representation is recorded by confirming the orders of the caurt/ Tribunat betow' Thelamount if any remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the lnsurance company witrrln one (1) month from the date of receipt of the award, atong with interest. 5' On such deposit, the ctaimant/Appettant/Petitioner is permitted to withdraw his entire share amount. 6' ln view of the above representation made by Appettant/petitioher/ctaimant and lnsurance comParY, both the app;*ats i.e., lvlAcMA No. gg of 2017 and MA.MA No.1g54 of 2017 stand disposed of as withdrawn. 7 Court fee paid oq,these appeats shatt be refunded. ai: ii

8. No costs. ":ltj "l;1 . i-i I -ii tsr-Jil; at ri !\^r. ...f - i l'i"i ".1,';;tlJj-1 r:;l It'ii I (:) o, flAcrn. .:", E"i I L ., , .i- iiti,"! BEF**il t;, o [. 4.t,,.rr ! r,".r,^i Appel lant (s) Respo ndent (s) CFF+[ii.4i.. CLiST EN. C t E -,i'46 :- 1t42€g$ i- ir3!2.O?T il**ir N -V. RMAN (Seat of the Committee) IF il$ [-IIG'-I COURT L*i( AtrEiLa.T x o'0ffiffi'r'f;F9ffifl3 T0 ffiffi T.T.u,f ,fi,{tgrXo,. V*^,r(.4-- ,?,i'*Yfi1HtJ:ijxxri,',ffi H,J,;imm;lffif fff;li;""

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments