High Court · 2025

Sri Verrrsetty Murali Krishna, S/o Babaiah, Aged 36 Years Occ Pvt Employee, R/o Plot No 52 Malla Reddy Colony, Beeramguda Ameenpur, Sanga Reddy District ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 1 AND

1. The State of Telangana, through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana 2. Sri P Ambica Vara Prasad, S/o Venkat Rao, Aged 47 years,Occ Pvt Employee Rio H No 161161911, SLN Homes, Mallareddy Nagar, Ameenpur ,Sanga Reddy District 3 Sri Vusrika Srinivas A/anoj, Sio Hanumantha Rao, Aged 30 years, Occ. Private service, R/o Plot No 52 Malla Reddy Colony, Beeramguda Ameenpur, Sanga Reddy District ...RESPONDENT No.2/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash in CC No 225 of 2019 on the file of Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Sanga Reddy, Telangana State and all consequential proceedings arising there from including thereupon and continuation of proceedings is clear abuse due process of Law and also the law laid down by the Supreme Court of lndia. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in CC No 225 of 201.9 on the file of Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Sanga Reddy, Telangana State against the petitioner including his appearance before Trial Court, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grcunds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B. Vijay Bhaskar Kakunoor, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri K.Madhavi, learned Asst Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri K. Ramachandra learned counsel for unofficial appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER :- ::.n ,.r€ THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMI NA L PETITION N o.5164 oF 2022 ORDEE This Orirninal petition is filed by the petitioner_accLrst,rd No.1 seeking to quas,h the proceedings against him in C.C lrlo .225 of 2019 pencling ,:rn the file of learned principal Junior Civil Jrrdge at Sanga RedcJy, registered for the offences under Sectror s 326, 323 read with 34 of the lndian penal Code (for short ,lpC t.

02. .lert-d Sri Vrlay Bhaskar Kakunoor B, k,rarned counsel for grel toner and Sri K.Ramachandra, learned cr>unsel for unofficial respondenl No.2 as well as Smt.S.Madhavi. Iearned Assistant public [)rosecutor for the State 03 Brrer facts of the case are that the houser; of the complainant ancr accused are adjacent. There is a dispLrte over the road and acc rrsed No. i used to resist the complainar t f amily not to use rhe rlad and adviced him to use ,nott,", roao and further he usecl tc, park his vehicle and his tenants vehicles o r the road in order tc resist the complainant and his famillr On 24.01 .2019 at abo_rt 10:00 plVl., the vehicle of the accused ,rlo.2 was parked in thrr middle of the road which is in obstrurdive I I I i 2 manner and the same was photographed by the complainant in his cell phone, for which accused No t hit the complainant with stone and later accused No.2 also bet the complainant and caused bleeding injuries.

04. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner is nothing to do with the alleged offences The present criminal case was filed as a counter-blast to the Crime No 36 of 2019, which was registered as C.C.No.269 of 2019 wherein the petitioner herein is the de-facto complainant and the respondent No.2 herein is shown as accused and the same is pending for adjudication. There was suppression of material facts by the respondent No.2. All the allegations pertain to civil dispute in respect of parking and utilization of common passage road' Therefore, he prayed this Court to quash the proceedings against petitioner-accusedbyallowingthisCriminalPetitionFurther'itis submitted that the learned trial Court had commenced the trial and the same is under Progress

05. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 contended that it is not a fit case to quash the \ \ in. .J proceedings against petitioner at this juncture and the matt3r is to be decided after conducting trial by the Court below and prilyed to dismiss this Crinrinal Petition

06. Or perusal of the entire record, there a'e triable issues and the truth or otherwise of the allegations made i,lgainst petitioner can t)3 decided only after conducting full-flecge:d trial. Learned counsel for both sides submitted that the trial is ir active progress before the learned trial Court. Therefore. t ris Court without going irto lhe merits and demerits of the case, is of the considered op rrion that there are no grounds to q rar;h the criminal proceeclings against the petitioner-accused. F:urtl'er, the learned trial ilourt shall not be influenced by an,l of the observations ma de in this Order, in any manner and sha I clispose of the main ,ras€r as expeditiously as possible, in accord anr:e with 07 With the above observations, this Crimina l)e.rition is disposed of I I ] As a serl:el, pending miscellaneous application s, if any, shall stand close,d i- SD/- I{IOHD. ISMAIL ASSIST Ah T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// .i . il. t I ' '<[,7"- SECTION OFFICER L I To

1. The Prl. Junior Oivil Judge at Sanga Reddy, Telangana State 2. The Station l-lo r;e Officer, Ameenpur Police Station, Sangare<:ldy District 3. One CC b Sri t]. Vijay Bhaskar Kakunoor, Advocate iOPl.X)l 4 Two UCs to pUBLtC PROSE CUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUTI Two CD copies. I}JLtslPSL w \ / ..,), s .) , -:, \ \;-. l-.lr r, \ 'r i.i .i., .$ \s : I I HIGH COURT DATED:171O312025 ORDER CRLP.No.Sl64 of 2022 I I CRIMINAL PETITION I]S DISPOSED OF I i, i I I I