High Court · 2026

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondents in not paying the Ex-gratia of Rs.5,00,000/- as per the provisions of Clause 4 and 5 of GO.Ms. 50, G.A. (Sc-A) Dept, dt 21-02-2014 is voilative of Article 14,16,21 of Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents to pay ex-gratia of Rs.5,00,000/- in terms of GO.Ms. 50, G.A. (Sc-A) Dept, dt21-02-2014 along with 8 % of interest from the date of issuing the said G.O. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 & 4 to consider the representations dated 16-04-2025 anrl 28-04-2025, of the petitioner submitted before Respondents No. 3 & 4 respectil'ely and to pay ex-gratia of Rs.5,00,000/- in terms of Go.Ms. 50, G.A. (Sc-A) Dt>pt, dt 21-02-2014 along with 8% of interest from the date of issuing the saic G.0, pending disposable of the main writ petition. Counsel for ther Petitioner: SRI B.H.R.CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FoR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for ther Respondent No.2: GP FOR LAND ACeUISITION Counsel for ther Respondent No.3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court mad,e the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN ORAL ORDER: Heard Mr.B.H.R.Choudary, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for General Administration appearing for the respondents.

2. According to the petitioner, his father, namely, Late Sri Nikirtha Mogili was grievously injured in an extremist attack on

17.10.1995 and he was admitted into the hospital. Thereafter, he died on 20.10.1995. Petitioner was aged about l0 years at the relevant point of time. Therefore, he was not applied for employment. His mother is alive. He has a brother and a sister. He is eligible for additional ex gratia in terms of G.O.Ms.No.50, General Administration (SCA) Department, dated 21.02.201,4. Therefore, he has submitted a representation to respondent No.4 with a request to pay compensation in terms of the said G.O. Respondent No.4 sought report from Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar, who in turn, vide proceedings dated t0.12.20I4 recommended for sanction of additional ex gratia of Rs.5,00,000/- in lieu of employment to the petitioner in terms of the aforesaid Z W.P.No.l85lO of 2025 G.O. E'ren then, respondent No.4 is not proceeding further and paying irdditional ex gratia to the petitioner herein' It is further contended by the petitioner that he has

3. submitted representation dated 28.04.2025 to respondent No.4 along vrith the copy of recommendation dated l0-12.2014 of the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar, with a request to pay additional ex gratia in terms of G.O.Ms.No.50, General Adrninistration (SCA) Department, dated 21.02.2014. Despite receiving and acknowledging the same, respotldent No.4 did not act upcrn the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.4, petitioner f,rled the present writ petition.

4. I-earned Government Pleader for General Administration, on instruc':ions, would submit that there is a delay on the part of the petitioner in approaching respondent No.4. As per the aforesaid G.O., petitioner is rtot entitled for the employment and additional ex gratta. However, respondent No.4 witl consider the repres()ntation submitted by the petitioner and also recomrnendation dated 10.12.2014 of the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar, and dispose it of in accordance with law. 5 KL, J W.P.No.I85lO of 2025

5. [n rhe light of the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 & 4 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 2g.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner. He shall consider the recommendation dated 10.12.2014 of the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar, and also the principle laid down by this courr vide order dated 3 l.0l .2025 in w.p.N o.l92t5 of 2022.If respondent No.4 is not inclined to pay the additi onal ex gratia in terms of G.o.Ms.No.50, General Administration (SCA) Department, dated 21.02.2014, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner. He shall complete the aforesaid exercise within four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. . \ \ SD/-M.NAGAMANI Ngre:' That the direction issued at the srh paragrarnASststRNT REGISTRAR of the order dated 01.or.2o2s in w.F.io.rasid ot 202s !s wrongly read as ,".ponA"nt No.4 instead of respondent_Nos.3 & 4 and ih" sam"-ir'""rr-""ted as per the ord_ers of Hon'bre court Jt. l.A.No.2 of 2025. This amended order shall substitute the earlier order which has already been dispatched on 06.08.202s. -ogldilzozo //TRUE COPYII To,

1. fhe Principal ,Secretary, (political), General Secretariat,' Hyderabio, SlrtE ;itLtjngr;."' "' SD/-M IS ANI !STRAR SECTION OFFICER stration Department,

2. The Ch ef Commissioner Land Acquisition, (CCLA) For the State of Telangarra, Nampally, Hyderabad (FAC), TS.

3. The Disl:rict Collector and Executive Magistrate, Hanamkonda (Warangal Urban) District.

4. The Dis;trict Collector Karimnal;ar. and Executive Magistrate, Karimnagar District,

5. One CC to SRI B.H.R.CHOWDARY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs; to GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, High Court for the State of Telanglana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION, High Court for the State of Telangarra at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderab:rd [OUT]

9. Two CD 3opies BSR/BSK HIGH COURT DATED: 0110712025 a910112026 AMENDED ORDER WP.No.I8510 of 2025 ** "r;:ri e).. O * I 2026 * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUTCOSTS